first appeal to registrar admin supreme court of india dated 09.01.2017
TRANSCRIPT
1/9/2017 Gmail Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 1/7
Om Prakash Poddar <[email protected]>
Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi
Om Prakash Poddar <[email protected]> Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:54 PMTo: supremecourt <[email protected]>
Date: 09/01/2017
Ref: Reply of Online RTI request No. JUSTC/R/2017/50023 dated
05.01.2017 in view of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005.
From:
Om Prakash
S/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar
R/O RZF893, Netaji Subhas Marg
Raj Nagar Part2, Palam Colony,
New Delhi10077
Mob: 9968337815
Email: [email protected]
To,
The First Appellate Authority (FAA),
1/9/2017 Gmail Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 2/7
The Registrar Admin & FAA,
Supreme Court of India
Tilak Marg, New Delhi
Sub: First Appeal U/S 19 (1) of RTI Act 2005 in view ofsection 7(1) of RTI Act 2005
Dear Sir/ Madam,
1. That the CAPIO, Department of Justice, Ministry of Law
& Justice, Government of India, physically transferred RTI
application in view of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005
received online vide registration no. JUSTC/R/2017/50023
dated 05.01.2017 to the Registrar Admin Supreme Court of
India dated 05.01.2017 (enclosed herewith the reply of
online RTI request transferred by Department of Justice to
the Registrar Admin Supreme Court of India dated
05.01.2017).
2. That Registrar Admin, Supreme Court of India neither
supplied the requested information sought within 48 hours
nor forwarded to the Public Authority under section 6(3)
(i)(ii) of RTI Act, 2005 to which the subject matter is
more closely connected with.
1/9/2017 Gmail Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 3/7
3. That either you can supply it or else you can order to
supply the same. Hence, request you to pass an order to
supply the following Information satisfactorily, or supply
the same as per the rules under RTI Act2005 in view of
Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005. My point wise averments and
arguments are as under:
Matter pertains to imminent danger to Life and Liberty of
a Senior Citizen oxygen dependent woman therefore
information has been sought in view of section 7(1) of RTI
Act 2005
4. Why Registrar Miscellaneous of Supreme Court of India
violated the Rules of Supreme Court of India and did not
list the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of
India’s court as the petitioner no. 02 had filed an
application for urgent mentioning of the matter and urgent
relief sought before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s
court on 03.10.2016 on the six grounds viz. Senior
Citizen woman; harassment of OBC woman; prevention of
corruption; issuance of NBW dated 08.09.2011 process
u/s 83 Cr.Pc. without the knowledge of petitioner and
after the settlement of the same matter by the
Hon’ble High Court of Delhi on 23.07.2013 in MAT.
1/9/2017 Gmail Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 4/7
APPL. 7 of 2012; apprehension of demolition of
property; inter linkages of matter with old matter of
this Hon’ble Court and short matter as per the rules
laid down in the handbook of this Hon’ble Court to
mention the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of
India’s court?
5. Why the Registrar Misc. Section X has suppressed the
record of application dated 03.10.2016 for urgent
mentioning and urgent relief sought filed by the
petitioner before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s
court in its office report dated 20.10 2016 issued by the
Registrar Section X of this Hon’ble Court?
6. Why Registrar Misc. has circulated an application for
Constitution bench dated 18.10.2016 vide diary no 77878
UNREGISTERED against the Writ Petition Criminal 136 of
2016 filed by the petitioner?
7. Why the Registrar Misc. has closed the door of Hon’ble
the Chief Justice of India’s court for the petitioner no.
02 and spoiled the valid ground of constitution bench and
pushed her into the curative stage intentionally?
1/9/2017 Gmail Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 5/7
8. Why Registrar Misc. has closed the door of Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India for ever for the petitioner after
raising the same defect which has been clarified by the
petitioner under para 15 of the Curative petition Criminal
through email letter dated 05.01.2017 against Curative
Criminal Petition vide diary no 41026 filed by petitioner
on 09.12 2016?
9. Why mentioning officer of Supreme Court of India
cheated the petitioner on 06.10.2016 and listed the matter
before court no. 06 instead of Hon’ble the Chief Justice
of India’s court despite of strong protest by the
petitioner?
10. Why matter has not been mentioned before Hon’ble the
Chief Justice of India’s court even after two emails dated
17.12.2016 and 31.12.2016 addressed to Secretary General
of Supreme Court of India for urgent mentioning of the
matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s court?
11. Why Hon’ble Apex Court is shielding and protecting
the bad elements of State Apparatus and harassing
offending victimizing the petitioner and his old aged
oxygen dependent mother wherein the Nexus of Rtd.
Justice S. B. Sinha and Praveen Kumar (IDAS);
1/9/2017 Gmail Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 6/7
Offence of PERJURY; 12 years long criminal conspiracy;
backstabbing; evasion of rule of law by the Advocates and
Judges from lower court to High Court to Supreme Court of
India since 12 years; NO ACTUAL PARTY ONLY PROXY WAR
THROUGH JUDGES IN TWO STATES SINCE 12 YEARS from Lower
Court to High Court to Supreme Court and Seven Cases have
reached up to Supreme Court of India till 09.12.2016; have
been apprised categorically by the petitioner?
Appellant falls under below the poverty line Category
hence requisite fees not enclosed with this RTI request.
The petitioner is filing the present First Appeal to the First
Appellate Authority, Registrar Admin, Supreme Court of India
to seek reply against the above noted 8 questions.
DRAWN & FILED BY:
PETITIONER IN PERSON
OM PRAKASH
NEW DELHI:
FILED ON : 09.01.2017
Encl:
1. Reply of online RTI request dated 05.01.2017
1/9/2017 Gmail Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 7/7
2. Certified Copy of Office report dated 20.10.2016 ofRegistrar Misc. Supreme Court of India along withapplications dated 03.10.16 and 18.10.2016.
2 attachments
Reply of Online RTI request dated 05.01.2017.pdf129K
Certified Copy of Office report dated 20.10.2016 of Registrar Misc Supreme Court of India along withapplications dated 03.10.16 & 18.10.16.pdf727K