first appeal to registrar admin supreme court of india dated 09.01.2017

7
1/9/2017 Gmail Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 1/7 Om Prakash Poddar <[email protected]> Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi Om Prakash Poddar <[email protected]> Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:54 PM To: supremecourt <[email protected]> Date: 09/01/2017 Ref: Reply of Online RTI request No. JUSTC/R/2017/50023 dated 05.01.2017 in view of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005. From: Om Prakash S/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar R/O RZF893, Netaji Subhas Marg Raj Nagar Part2, Palam Colony, New Delhi10077 Mob: 9968337815 Email: [email protected] To, The First Appellate Authority (FAA),

Upload: om-prakash-poddar

Post on 12-Feb-2017

19 views

Category:

Law


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: First Appeal to Registrar Admin Supreme Court of India dated 09.01.2017

1/9/2017 Gmail ­ Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 1/7

Om Prakash Poddar <[email protected]>

Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi

Om Prakash Poddar <[email protected]> Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:54 PMTo: supremecourt <[email protected]>

Date: 09/01/2017

Ref: Reply of Online RTI request No. JUSTC/R/2017/50023 dated

05.01.2017 in view of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005.

From:

Om Prakash

S/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar

R/O RZF­893, Netaji Subhas Marg

Raj Nagar Part­2, Palam Colony,

New Delhi­10077

Mob: 9968337815

E­mail: [email protected]

To,

The First Appellate Authority (FAA),

Page 2: First Appeal to Registrar Admin Supreme Court of India dated 09.01.2017

1/9/2017 Gmail ­ Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 2/7

The Registrar Admin & FAA,

Supreme Court of India

Tilak Marg, New Delhi

Sub: First Appeal U/S 19 (1) of RTI Act 2005 in view ofsection 7(1) of RTI Act 2005

Dear Sir/ Madam,

1. That the CAPIO, Department of Justice, Ministry of Law

& Justice, Government of India, physically transferred RTI

application in view of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005

received online vide registration no. JUSTC/R/2017/50023

dated 05.01.2017 to the Registrar Admin Supreme Court of

India dated 05.01.2017 (enclosed herewith the reply of

online RTI request transferred by Department of Justice to

the Registrar Admin Supreme Court of India dated

05.01.2017).

2. That Registrar Admin, Supreme Court of India neither

supplied the requested information sought within 48 hours

nor forwarded to the Public Authority under section 6(3)

(i)(ii) of RTI Act, 2005 to which the subject matter is

more closely connected with.

Page 3: First Appeal to Registrar Admin Supreme Court of India dated 09.01.2017

1/9/2017 Gmail ­ Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 3/7

3. That either you can supply it or else you can order to

supply the same. Hence, request you to pass an order to

supply the following Information satisfactorily, or supply

the same as per the rules under RTI Act­2005 in view of

Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005. My point wise averments and

arguments are as under:

Matter pertains to imminent danger to Life and Liberty of

a Senior Citizen oxygen dependent woman therefore

information has been sought in view of section 7(1) of RTI

Act 2005

4. Why Registrar Miscellaneous of Supreme Court of India

violated the Rules of Supreme Court of India and did not

list the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of

India’s court as the petitioner no. 02 had filed an

application for urgent mentioning of the matter and urgent

relief sought before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s

court on 03.10.2016 on the six grounds viz. Senior

Citizen woman; harassment of OBC woman; prevention of

corruption; issuance of NBW dated 08.09.2011 process

u/s 83 Cr.Pc. without the knowledge of petitioner and

after the settlement of the same matter by the

Hon’ble High Court of Delhi on 23.07.2013 in MAT.

Page 4: First Appeal to Registrar Admin Supreme Court of India dated 09.01.2017

1/9/2017 Gmail ­ Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 4/7

APPL. 7 of 2012; apprehension of demolition of

property; inter linkages of matter with old matter of

this Hon’ble Court and short matter as per the rules

laid down in the handbook of this Hon’ble Court to

mention the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of

India’s court?

5. Why the Registrar Misc. Section X has suppressed the

record of application dated 03.10.2016 for urgent

mentioning and urgent relief sought filed by the

petitioner before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s

court in its office report dated 20.10 2016 issued by the

Registrar Section X of this Hon’ble Court?

6. Why Registrar Misc. has circulated an application for

Constitution bench dated 18.10.2016 vide diary no 77878

UNREGISTERED against the Writ Petition Criminal 136 of

2016 filed by the petitioner?

7. Why the Registrar Misc. has closed the door of Hon’ble

the Chief Justice of India’s court for the petitioner no.

02 and spoiled the valid ground of constitution bench and

pushed her into the curative stage intentionally?

Page 5: First Appeal to Registrar Admin Supreme Court of India dated 09.01.2017

1/9/2017 Gmail ­ Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 5/7

8. Why Registrar Misc. has closed the door of Hon’ble

Supreme Court of India for ever for the petitioner after

raising the same defect which has been clarified by the

petitioner under para 15 of the Curative petition Criminal

through email letter dated 05.01.2017 against Curative

Criminal Petition vide diary no 41026 filed by petitioner

on 09.12 2016?

9. Why mentioning officer of Supreme Court of India

cheated the petitioner on 06.10.2016 and listed the matter

before court no. 06 instead of Hon’ble the Chief Justice

of India’s court despite of strong protest by the

petitioner?

10. Why matter has not been mentioned before Hon’ble the

Chief Justice of India’s court even after two emails dated

17.12.2016 and 31.12.2016 addressed to Secretary General

of Supreme Court of India for urgent mentioning of the

matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s court?

11. Why Hon’ble Apex Court is shielding and protecting

the bad elements of State Apparatus and harassing

offending victimizing the petitioner and his old aged

oxygen dependent mother wherein the Nexus of Rtd.

Justice S. B. Sinha and Praveen Kumar (IDAS);

Page 6: First Appeal to Registrar Admin Supreme Court of India dated 09.01.2017

1/9/2017 Gmail ­ Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 6/7

Offence of PERJURY; 12 years long criminal conspiracy;

backstabbing; evasion of rule of law by the Advocates and

Judges from lower court to High Court to Supreme Court of

India since 12 years; NO ACTUAL PARTY ONLY PROXY WAR

THROUGH JUDGES IN TWO STATES SINCE 12 YEARS from Lower

Court to High Court to Supreme Court and Seven Cases have

reached up to Supreme Court of India till 09.12.2016; have

been apprised categorically by the petitioner?

Appellant falls under below the poverty line Category

hence requisite fees not enclosed with this RTI request.

The petitioner is filing the present First Appeal to the First

Appellate Authority, Registrar Admin, Supreme Court of India

to seek reply against the above noted 8 questions.

DRAWN & FILED BY:

PETITIONER IN PERSON

OM PRAKASH

NEW DELHI:

FILED ON : 09.01.2017

Encl:

1. Reply of online RTI request dated 05.01.2017

Page 7: First Appeal to Registrar Admin Supreme Court of India dated 09.01.2017

1/9/2017 Gmail ­ Attn:The Registrar Admin & FAA, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5635d69bd5&view=pt&search=sent&msg=159839de68a71f14&siml=159839de68a71f14 7/7

2. Certified Copy of Office report dated 20.10.2016 ofRegistrar Misc. Supreme Court of India along withapplications dated 03.10.16 and 18.10.2016.

2 attachments

Reply of Online RTI request dated 05.01.2017.pdf129K

Certified Copy of Office report dated 20.10.2016 of Registrar Misc Supreme Court of India along withapplications dated 03.10.16 & 18.10.16.pdf727K