for ethical issues in science and technology j. blackmon
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
TECHNOLOGY AND ETHICS
For Ethical Issues in Science and TechnologyJ. Blackmon
![Page 2: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline
Select Themes in Ethics of Technology Ethical Theory and Terminology Conclusion
![Page 3: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Themes in Ethics of Technology
![Page 4: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Themes in Ethics of Technology Innovation Presumption: Liberty, Optimism, and
Inevitability Situated Technologies Lifecycle Power Forms of Life Extrinsic Concerns Intrinsic Concerns Responsible Development Ethics and Public Policy Framework for Ethical Analysis of Emerging
Technologies
![Page 5: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Themes in Ethics of Technology Innovation Presumption: Liberty, Optimism, and
Inevitability Situated Technologies Lifecycle Power Forms of Life Extrinsic Concerns Intrinsic Concerns Responsible Development Ethics and Public Policy Framework for Ethical Analysis of Emerging
Technologies
![Page 6: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Themes in Ethics of Technology Innovation Presumption: Liberty, Optimism, and
Inevitability Situated Technologies Lifecycle Power Forms of Life Extrinsic Concerns Intrinsic Concerns Responsible Development Ethics and Public Policy Framework for Ethical Analysis of Emerging
Technologies
![Page 7: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Innovation Presumption
Why does the ethical evaluation of technology tend to focus on what might be problematic about it?
Are we all luddites?
![Page 8: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Innovation Presumption
Innovation Presumption: We should invent, adopt, and use new technologies.
![Page 9: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Innovation Presumption
Innovation Presumption: We should invent, adopt, and use new technologies.
Innovation Presumption + Unknown Consequences → Warranted Scrutiny
![Page 10: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Innovation Presumption
Innovation Presumption: We should invent, adopt, and use new technologies.
The popularity of the Innovation Presumption + Unknown Consequences → Warranted Scrutiny
![Page 11: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Innovation Presumption
And it’s a win either way: Scrutiny allows us to avoid paying the negative consequences where the IP turns out to have been false. And should it turn out to be true in other cases, scrutiny may reveal why it’s true.
So, we advocate scrutiny of the IP without adopting an unfair bias against it.
![Page 12: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Innovation Presumption
Three Principles Supporting the IP1. Liberty: We should be free to innovate so
long as it isn’t harmful to others. (J. S. Mill’s Harm Principle)
2. Technological Optimism: Technology improves and will continue to improve human lives.
3. Technological Determinism: Technological advancement is inevitable.
![Page 13: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Innovation Presumption
Three Principles Supporting the IP1. Liberty: We should be free to innovate so
long as it isn’t harmful to others. (J. S. Mill’s Harm Principle)
2. Technological Optimism: Technology improves and will continue to improve human lives.
3. Technological Determinism: Technological advancement is inevitable.
![Page 14: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Innovation Presumption
Liberty: We should be free to innovate so long as it isn’t harmful to others.
Harm Principle: The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.
![Page 15: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Innovation Presumption
Liberty: We should be free to innovate so long as it isn’t harmful to others.
Much remains to be said! What is harm? Who are the others? What kind of power, and how much?
![Page 16: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Innovation Presumption
Liberty: We should be free to innovate so long as it isn’t harmful to others.
Much remains to be said! What is harm? Who are the others? What kind of power, and how much?
![Page 17: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Harm to others?
Cindy cuts Jake She’s a trained surgeon performing an
emergency tracheotomy with no anesthesia.
Cindy has caused physical damage and pain to Jake. She may even have done this against his will.
Has Cindy caused harm to Jake?
![Page 18: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Harm to others?
Cindy cuts Jake She’s a trained surgeon performing an
emergency tracheotomy with no anesthesia.
Cindy has caused physical damage and pain to Jake. She may even have done this against his will.
Has Cindy caused harm to Jake?
![Page 19: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Harm to others?
Cindy cuts Jake So perhaps whether Cindy harms Jake
depends on whether she saves him from further/worse harm.
![Page 20: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Harm to others?
Cindy cuts Jake So perhaps whether Cindy harms Jake
depends on whether she saves him from further/worse harm.
But then whether harm is being committed depends on what is yet to come.
![Page 21: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Harm to others?
Cindy cuts Jake So perhaps whether Cindy harms Jake
depends on whether she saves him from further/worse harm.
But then whether harm is being committed depends on what is yet to come.
This is a notorious problem: How far into the future should we look when assessing consequences?
![Page 22: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Harm to others?
How far into the future should we look when assessing consequences?
Even if we somehow decided, should this view of harm as something determined by future outcomes be defended, or should we look for a more plausible/satisfying alternative?
![Page 23: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Harm to others?
The Dukes of Hazzard Bo and Luke Duke
drive with extreme recklessness all over town, never hitting a single person due largely to luck.
Have they harmed anyone?
![Page 24: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Harm to others?
Liberty: We should be free to innovate so long as it isn’t harmful to others.
Much remains to be said! What is harm? Who are the others? What kind of power, and how much?
![Page 25: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Harm to others?
The Chalk Checker Ida parks in a 1-hour parking space for
more than an hour when other 1-hour spaces are left unoccupied. She gets a ticket.
![Page 26: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Harm to others?
The Chalk Checker In court, Ida cites the great philosopher J.
S. Mill, saying, “The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against her will, is to prevent harm to others. But fining me does not prevent harm to anyone, not even if we count mere inconvenience as a harm. After all, no one was harmed, not even inconvenienced.”
![Page 27: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Harm to others?
The Chalk Checker In court, Ida cites the great philosopher J.
S. Mill, saying, “The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against her will, is to prevent harm to others. But fining me does not prevent harm to anyone, not even if we count mere inconvenience as a harm. After all, no one was harmed, not even inconvenienced.”
![Page 28: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Harm to others?
The Chalk Checker Is Ida right? Which “other” has been
harmed? And if she is right, does the city have a case against her?
If the city does have a case against her, and yet no one has been harmed, then is J. S. Mill is wrong?
![Page 29: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Harm to others?
Non-existing Future and Possible Persons Recall the
commentator on Krasny’s Forum show: There are no passenger pigeons wanting to be brought back into existence.
![Page 30: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Harm to others?
Non-existing Future and Possible Persons The problem
generalizes.
![Page 31: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Harm to others?
Test Cases Cindy the Surgeon The Dukes of Hazzard The Chalk Checker Non-Existing Future and Possible Pigeons
(Persons)
These cases test the Harm Principle.
![Page 32: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Harm to others?
Test Cases Cindy the Surgeon The Dukes of Hazzard The Chalk Checker Non-Existing Future and Possible Pigeons
(Persons)
Harm Principle: The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.
![Page 33: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Harm to others?
Questions What is harm? Who are the others? What kind of power?
![Page 34: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Power?
What kind of power? In many countries, the state has
intervened in the sale and distribution of cigarettes—ostensibly for the good of the people.
State Paternalism: In some cases, the state should limit the behavior of the people for their own good.
![Page 35: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Power?
What kind of power? Hard Paternalism: Restricting activity for
the good of the person regardless of whether they are informed and consenting.
Soft Paternalism: Restricting activity for the good of the person until that person meets certain standards for voluntary action.
![Page 36: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Power?
What kind of power? Thus, the Harm Principle and the Liberty
Principle raise questions about the exercise of power.
When power/intervention is called for, how should it be used?
![Page 37: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Power?
What kind of power? Laws use coercion. Financial incentives Self-regulation
![Page 38: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Recap
Liberty: We should be free to innovate so long as it isn’t harmful to others.
Harm Principle: The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his/her will, is to prevent harm to others.
While these principles may be attractive and compelling sentiments, they do not in themselves resolve important questions about harm, others, and power.
![Page 39: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
![Page 40: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Types of Value Instrumental Value: the value of something as
a means to an end. Intrinsic/Final Value: the value of something
for what it is or as an end.
![Page 41: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Types of Value Instrumental Value: the value of something as
a means to an end. Intrinsic/Final Value: the value of something
for what it is or as an end. Subjective Objective
![Page 42: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Types of Value Instrumental Value: the value of something as
a means to an end. Intrinsic/Final Value: the value of something
for what it is or as an end. Subjective Objective
![Page 43: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Instrumental Value: the value of something as a means to an end.
![Page 44: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Instrumental Value: the value of something as a means to an end.
The hammer has instrumental value because it does something valuable: pound nails.
![Page 45: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Pounding nailsgets value from
easily and securely fastening pieces of wood together
gets value from
building safe comfortable structures
gets value from
Health, comfort, general happiness.
![Page 46: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Instrumental Value: the value of something as a means to an end.
Instrumental value entails some non-instrumental value.
![Page 47: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Types of Value Instrumental Value: the value of something as
a means to an end. Intrinsic/Final Value: the value of something
for what it is or as an end. Subjective Objective
![Page 48: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Intrinsic/Final Value: the value of something for it is or as an end. Subjective: The value depends on how or
whether we value it. Objective: The value is independent of how or
whether we value it.
![Page 49: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Subjective Final Value: Valued by us as an end in itself
Examples of things often thought to have subjective final value: Works of art Landscapes Mementos Religious artifacts Historical sites
![Page 50: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Objective Final Value: Valuable independent of whether it’s valued by us as an end in itself
Examples of things often thought to have objective final value: Human beings Life
Typically, technology is not thought to have objective final value.
But of course, it affects things which do have it.
![Page 51: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Types of Theories Example: Animal Testing
Suppose that developing a novel medical technology requires extensive animal testing which would cause considerable and persistent pain and suffering. Suppose also that these animals are morally considerable—their suffering matters in a moral sense. Should the testing go forward?
![Page 52: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Types of Theories One Response: It depends on the balance
of the good and bad outcomes that would result (or are expected to result) from the testing. If the outcome is likely to be overall good, then Yes; if the outcome is likely to be overall bad, then No.
![Page 53: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Types of Theories Another Response: No. It is wrong to
intentionally cause harm to animals.
![Page 54: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Types of Theories Another Response: Yes. It is permissible
to use (nonhuman) animals in the service of humans.
![Page 55: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Types of Theories It depends on the balance of the good
and bad outcomes. No. Yes.
![Page 56: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Types of Theories It depends on the balance of the good
and bad outcomes. --Consequentialist No. --Deontological Yes. --Deontological
![Page 57: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Types of Theories Consequentialist Normative Theory: One
ought to take the action which will result in the best outcome.
Deontological Normative Theory: One ought to do something if it conforms to an operative rule.
![Page 58: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Types of Theories Consequentialist Normative Theory: One
ought to take the action which will result in the best outcome.
Deontological Normative Theory: One ought to do something if it conforms to an operative rule.
Virtue Theory: One ought to do whatever is an instance of virtue: compassion, courage honesty, etc.
![Page 59: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Types of Theories Consequentialist Normative Theory: One
ought to take the action which will result in the best outcome.
Deontological Normative Theory: One ought to do something if it conforms to an operative rule.
Virtue Theory: One ought to do whatever is an instance of virtue: compassion, courage, honesty, etc.
![Page 60: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Consequentialist Normative Theory Utilitarianism: One ought to take the
action which will maximize utility.
![Page 61: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Utilitarianism: One ought to take the action which will maximize utility.
![Page 62: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Utilitarianism: One ought to take the action which will maximize utility. What is utility?
![Page 63: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Utilitarianism: One ought to take the action which will maximize utility. What is utility?
Pleasure (Jeremy Bentham) Happiness (J. S. Mill)
![Page 64: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Utilitarianism: One ought to take the action which will maximize utility. What is utility?
Pleasure (Jeremy Bentham) Happiness (J. S. Mill)
Maximizing pleasure or happiness?
![Page 65: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Isn’t this just what they call hedonism?
![Page 66: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Isn’t this just what they call hedonism?Not really. For at least two reasons.
![Page 67: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
First, there are versions of utilitarianism which go beyond base pleasure. What is utility?
Pleasure (Jeremy Bentham) Happiness, and greater and lesser kinds of
happiness (J. S. Mill) Preference Satisfaction? Well-being or welfare? Lack of pain and suffering?
![Page 68: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
First, there are versions of utilitarianism which go beyond base pleasure. What is utility?
Pleasure (Jeremy Bentham) Happiness, and greater and lesser kinds of
happiness (J. S. Mill) Preference Satisfaction? Well-being or welfare? Lack of pain and suffering?
![Page 69: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
“It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.”
J. S. Mill
There are different kinds of happiness: higher quality and lower quality.
![Page 70: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Second, it depends on what you mean by hedonism.Is utilitarianism a kind of hedonism? Yes, partly, by the original philosophical
meaning. No, not at all, by a popular conception.
![Page 71: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Philosophical/Historical Definition: Hedonism is the view that the only intrinsic (non-instrumental) value is pleasure.
A Common Definition: Hedonism is the pursuit of pleasure; sensual self-indulgence; self-gratification.
![Page 72: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Utilitarianism is emphatically not about maximizing one’s own happiness. That would be ethical egoism.
Goal of Utilitarianism: The greatest good for the greatest number.
And this can entail great personal sacrifice, which is entirely antithetical to ethical egoism.
![Page 73: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
A good utilitarian: “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.”Dr. Spock, Star Trek II
The Wrath of Khan
![Page 74: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
A good utilitarian: “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.”Dr. Spock, Star Trek II
The Wrath of Khan
Which many?
![Page 75: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
A good utilitarian: “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.”Dr. Spock, Star Trek II
The Wrath of Khan
Which many?What needs?
![Page 76: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Ethical Theory and Terminology
Utilitarianism: One ought to take the action which will maximize utility.
What counts as utility? What is it to maximize it?
![Page 77: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its CriticsFrom Ian Barbour’s ‘Philosophy and Human Values’
![Page 78: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
As Ian Barbour points out, if we are only concerned with the greatest good for the greatest number, certain questions and problems arise.
![Page 79: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
As Ian Barbour points out, if we are only concerned with the greatest good for the greatest number, certain questions and problems arise. Who matters?
![Page 80: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
As Ian Barbour points out, if we are only concerned with the greatest good for the greatest number, certain questions and problems arise. Who matters? How do we quantify and measure utility?
And if there are different kinds, how do we compare them?
![Page 81: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
As Ian Barbour points out, if we are only concerned with the greatest good for the greatest number, certain questions and problems arise. Who matters? How do we quantify and measure utility?
And if there are different kinds, how do we compare them?
Total utility is blind to distribution of utility; thus, there is nothing inherently wrong with disparities of justice and equality.
![Page 82: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
![Page 83: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
Bill Gates walks into a bar…
The total income of this group is $505,000, leading to an average income of $50,500.
![Page 84: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
Bill Gates walks into a bar…
Gates walks in with his $1 billion income. The total income of the group shoots way up to over $1 billion. Thus the mean income is over 0.1 billion dollars or $100 million.
![Page 85: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
Who Matters? Most forms of utilitarianism are
anthropocentric (human-centered). But increasingly the “circle of moral consideration” has expanded to include non-human animals.
This raises questions, however, about which animals are included.
This in turn raises the question of what makes an entity worthy of moral consideration.
![Page 86: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
Who Matters? Also, do we include
the happiness of only living beings?
Or do we include the happiness of those who are yet to come?
![Page 87: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
Who Matters? If the latter, that is if we include the
happiness of those who are yet to come, how exactly do we do this?
How far into the future do we have to look? And what we do now not only determines
“happiness levels”, but it also determines who will end up coming into existence.
“My parents should have waited until they were better off financially before having me!”
![Page 88: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
Who Matters? As Barbour points out, if sum total
happiness is the goal, then this might be achieved just by having a great number of moderately happy people in the world.
Worse, they could no more that just tolerable well off, so long as there is enough of them.
Derek Parfit calls this this the “repugnant conclusion”: This would not be a good world.
![Page 89: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
How do we quantify the greatest good? Is there just one thing, happiness (or
pleasure, or whatever), that can be measured on a single numerical scale?
It would appear not. In fact, it appears that we have different kinds of goods.
![Page 90: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
How do we quantify the greatest good? Is there just one thing, happiness (or
pleasure, or whatever), that can be measured on a single numerical scale?
It would appear not. In fact, it appears that we have different kinds of goods.
If so, then what if they are incommensurable?
![Page 91: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
Total utility is blind to distribution. Suppose the extermination of a small
minority would make the majority so happy that the total happiness it increased.
Suppose total national income can be increased if we accept great poverty for one segment of society.
![Page 92: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
Total utility is blind to distribution. Suppose the extermination of a small
minority would make the majority so happy that the total happiness it increased.
Suppose total national income can be increased if we accept great poverty for one segment of society.
According to utilitarianism, there is nothing inherently wrong here.
![Page 93: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
Total utility is blind to distribution. This blindness to distribution results in a
system that is unjust. Unless we are prepared to abandon
justice, utilitarianism without justice must be rejected.
We might reject utilitarianism altogether, or we might supplement it with a principle of justice.
![Page 94: For Ethical Issues in Science and Technology J. Blackmon](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062307/551b01c65503465e7d8b57bf/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Its Critics
Utility and Justice If the total good were the only criterion,
then we could justify a small social gain even if it entailed a gross injustice.
But if justice were the only norm, then we would have to correct a small injustice even if it resulted in widespread suffering or social harm.
Apparently, we must consider both justice and the total good.