from mdgs to sdgs: david hulme on global goals
TRANSCRIPT
From MDGs to SDGs: All Change or No Change for the Global
Governance of ‘Development’?David Hulme
Global Development InstituteUniversity of Manchester
22nd Bradford Development Lecture February 2016
www.gdi.manchester.ac.uk
•1 January 2016 MDGs retired, SDGs started•What does this tell us about global governance -
about the way the world is run?•Transformation - From Big ‘D’
to little ‘d’?
Introduction
•Evolution - Belated response to Rising Powers? •Bulls**t - World’s biggest
lie… ‘development’ remains marginal to the international agenda?
MDGs – A brief history 1
•UN, a history of global goal setting. Successes (smallpox) and not so good (education for all)•Structural Adjustment (1980s) – ‘silly talk’•End of Cold War 1990 – return of UN summits,
rise of civil society, declarations galore• OECD-DAC 1995 and 1996 – need to “save”
foreign aid. Accidently create Intn’l Dev’t Goals•UN – needs a good Millennium General
Assem’y
MDGs to SDGs: a brief history 2
•Millennium Declaration – a UN diplomatic compromise•Negotiated to MDGs – an IMF, OECD, UN and
World Bank interpretation of the Declaration •Gradual adoption of MDGs by agencies (DFID
fast, IMF slow) and national governments•UN Secretariat moratorium on ‘what comes
after MDGs’ until 2012
MDGs to SDGs: a brief history 4•OWG the powerhouse – UNGA G77 membership
takes ‘Rio+20’ as its base…global deliberations •MDG performance – Half full/empty…causality
•Many additions• energy• growth and jobs • reducing inequality • peace and justice (governance) • many more environmental goals
So what has changed? Content 2
So what has changed? Content 2
•Holistic –from MDGs to national development•Leave nobody behind – from $1.25-a-day
poverty reduction to multi-dimensional poverty eradication•Universal – for all •National ownership
So what has changed? Processes
•The processes – big changes•From informal to formal ‘global governance’•From goals set by rich countries and aid
agencies to goals set by all UN member states•MDGs were driven by needs and preferences of
OECD members – especially aid agencies•By 2015 ‘development’ is a global agenda…not
just an aid agenda
So what has not changed?
•Non-binding agreement - as 2000 not a treaty – countries keen to avoid any possibility of imposition of SDGs•Results-based management format – primary
focus on delivery, not on social norms or negotiating structural change•Global partnership – the key mechanism is an
unspecified, multi-stakeholder ‘partnership(s)’
•Global shift of productive capacity from West to East and South underpins MDG to SDG shift•Rise of the BRICs – especially rise of China and
ambition of Brazil as an international leader•Emerging middle powers – countries such as
Colombia, Indonesia and Turkey more engaged•Africa – empowered by economic growth and
access to finance from China and BRICS
Understanding Change:Material Capabilities
Understanding Changes – Ideas
•Continuity – poverty, human development, RBM, partnership…stronger sustainability•But also, lots of “new” ideas• Growth and jobs (inclusive and sustainable)
• Peace and reduced violence• Governance…justice…institutions
• Inequality reduction within and across countries
Understanding Changes:Institutions
•UN = arena for super-goal setting•Actors empowered by new material capabilities –
AU, Brazilian and Colombian governments•New financial institutions – AIIB, NDB, CRA•NGOs – from mobilising civil society to professional
advocates?
Transformation or Evolution?
•Depends on the framework you select and criteria it prioritises •In content terms can argue transformation –
inequality reduction, peace/conflict, governance/institutions…sustainability•In process terms then evolution, but an
accelerated evolution – BRICs, “Rio” and OWG•Or, “it is all about Paris”
Transformation or Evolution…or Both?
•Since 1 January 2016 “development” is no longer defined by donor nations•The SDGs era expands opportunities for
progressive change – seize them•But material capabilities explain change
more than ideas…global capitalism and consumerism over inclusivity/sustainability•The players are changing…game has not?