furman center manhattancb9 2010

8/3/2019 Furman Center ManhattanCB9 2010

1/1478 T H E F U R M A N C E N T E R F O R R E A L E S T A T E & U R B A N P O L I C Y

2009 Rank

Popuation (10)

Popuation Density (1,000 persons per suare ie) (10)

median Househod Incoe

Incoe Diersity Ratio

Pubic and Subsidized Renta Housing Units (% o renta units)Rent-Reguated Units (% o renta units)

Residentia Units in a Historic District

Residentia Units within 1/4 mie o a Park

Residentia Units within 1/2 mie o a Subway/Rai Entrance

Unused Capacity Rate (% o and area)

1,585,873

69.5

$68,706

8.2

21.5%54.5%

11.8%

94.2%

90.4%

26.9%

3

1

1

1

22

1

2

1

4

manhattan

20%

40%

60%

80%

Racial and Ethnic Composition of Manhattan versus New York CityManhattan in 2000

AsianBlackWhite Hispanic

Households in Manhattan in Each New York City Income Quintile (2009)$0$18,690

$18,690$39,479

$39,479$65,966

$65,966$110,942

$110,942+

18.1% 15.6% 18.1%

33.5%

14.9%

Manhattan in 2009 NYC in 2009NYC in 2000

despiteadropinhousingpricesin2009,

ManhattanprovedtohaveNewYorkCitys

mostresilienthousingmarketthroughoutthe

realestatedownturn.In2010,condominium

pricesleveledoandevenroseromthetroughin2009.

Manhattanssalesvolumehasalsobeguntobounce

back,atersharpdropsin2009.Between2009and

2010,condominiumsalesvolumeincreasedour

percent,thoughitwasstilllittlemorethanhalthe

volumeo2008.

AlthoughhousingpricesinManhattanhave

weatheredtherealestatedownturnrelativelywell,the

numberonewunitsauthorizedbybuildingpermits

hasplummeted,mirroringthecitywidedropinnew

construction.Fromapeako9,735in2008,thenumber

onewunitsauthorizedbybuildingpermitsinManhat-

tandroppedto265in2010,withanastounding10out

o12communitydistrictsintheboroughreceivingno

permitsornewresidentialconstruction.Treeothese

(UpperWestSide,MorningsideHeights/HamiltonandWashingtonHeights/Inwood)havenotreceived

anypermitssince2008.

Noticesooreclosureweredownby15.9percent

throughoutthecity,butremainedsteadyinManhat-

tan,decreasingonlyrom724noticesin2009to722in

2010.ManhattanledNewYorkCityinrefnanceloan

originations,withtherefnancerateuprom13.2per

1,000propertiesin2008to38.1per1,000propertiesin

2009.TesharesohomepurchaseloansinManhattan

thatwerehighcostandFHA/VA-backedwerenegligible

at1.7percentand0.5percentrespectively.

ManhattanovertookStatenIslandtobecomethe

boroughwiththehighestmedianhouseholdincomein

2009.Oalltheboroughs,Manhattanexperiencedthe

greatestgrowthinmedianhouseholdincomebetween

2000($58,593)and2009($68,706).Manhattanisalso

themostincomediverseotheboroughs;theincome

ohouseholdsatthe80thpercentileis8.2timesthe

incomeohouseholdsatthe20thpercentile.

Despitetherecentrecession,themedianmonthly

contractrentcontinuestoriseinManhattan,reaching

$1,243in2009.Manhattansresidents,75percento

whomarerenters,paythehighestrentsinNewYork

City,buttheyalsospendthesmallestpercentageotheir

incomeonrent,duetotheirrelativelyhighincomes.Manhattanisquiteraciallyandethnicallydiverse,

butanincreasingshareoitsresidentsarewhite.Just

underhaloManhattanresidentswerewhitein2010

(48.0%),anincreaseo2.2percentagepointsrom

2000,whiletheshareoblackandHispanicresidents

alldecreasedduringthesameperiod.


2/14S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K C I T Y S H O U S I N G & N E I G H B O R H O O D S 2 0 1 0 79

Rank Rank2000 2008 2009 2010 (00) (09/10)

Housing: Stock

Housing Units

Renta vacancy Rate

Units Issued New Certifcates o Occupancy

Units Authorized by New Residentia Buiding Perits

Hoeownership Rate

Housing: market

Index o Housing Price Appreciation (condoiniu)

Index o Housing Price Appreciation (5+ aiy buiding)

median Saes Price per Unit (condoiniu)

median Saes Price per Unit (5+ aiy buiding)

Saes voue (condoiniu)

Saes voue (5+ aiy buiding)

median monthy Contract Rent

median Rent Burden

Housing: Finance

Hoe Purchase loan Rate (per 1,000 properties)

High Cost Hoe Purchase loans (% o hoe purchase oans)

FHA/vA-Backed Hoe Purchase loans (% o hoe purchase oans)

Refnance loan Rate (per 1,000 properties)

High Cost Refnance loans (% o refnance oans)

Notices o Forecosure (a residentia properties)

Notices o Forecosure Rate (per 1,000 14 aiy properties)

Properties that Entered REO

Tax Deinuencies (% o residentia properties deinuent 1 year)

Housing: quaity and Crowding

Housing Code vioations, Serious (per 1,000 renta units)

Housing Code vioations, Tota (per 1,000 renta units)

Seere Crowding Rate (% o renter househods)

Popuation: Deographics

Popuation

Popuation Density (1,000 persons per suare ie)

Foreign-Born Popuation

Percent White

Percent Back

Percent Hispanic

Percent Asian

Racia Diersity Index

Popuation 65 and Oder

Househods with Chidren under 18 Years Od

Popuation: Incoe, Education and Epoyent



Poerty Rate

Unepoyent Rate

Pubic Transportation Ratemean Trae Tie to Work (inutes)

Serious Crie Rate (per 1,000 residents)

Adut Incarceration Rate (per 100,000 peope aged 15 or oder)

Students Peroring at Grade lee in Reading

Students Peroring at Grade lee in math

Popuation: Heath

Astha Hospitaizations (per 1,000 peope)

Eeated Bood lead lees (incidence per 1,000 chidren)

Inant mortaity Rate (per 1,000 ie births)1

low Birth Weight Rate (per 1,000 ie births)

798,144 847,090 3 2

3.4% 3.4% 4.4% 3 2

5,131 4,793 5,139 1,780 1 4

4,980 9,735 556 265 1 3

20.1% 23.7% 25.1% 4 4

100.0 233.5 200.6 211.7 4

100.0 295.6 230.9 234.2 1

$664,936 $1,093,063 $1,014,904 $1,045,881 1 1

$80,007 $184,447 $143,639 $128,063 1 1

2,530 9,021 4,999 5,206 1 1

282 407 262 386 2 2

$1,136 $1,243 1

27.1% 27.4% 5

28.6 16.3 4

1.4% 1.7% 5

0.1% 0.5% 5

13.2 38.1 1

2.6% 0.7% 5

356 334 724 722 5 5

31.3 11.6 13.4 11.4 1 5

7 3 6 3 4 5

6.6% 1.9% 2.5% 1 3

30.8 32.0 36.5 3

148.6 154.3 170.5 3

3.2% 2.8% 4

1,537,195 1,585,873 3 3

67.1 69.5 1 1 29.4% 28.1% 27.0% 3 4

45.8% 48.0% 2 2

15.3% 12.9% 4 4

27.2% 25.4% 2 3

9.3% 11.2% 2 2

0.68 0.68 3 3

12.2% 12.9% 12.7% 2 2

19.7% 19.7% 19.4% 5 5

$58,593 $68,771 $68,706 2 1

7.8 9.0 8.2 1 1

20.0% 16.9% 16.6% 3 3

8.5% 6.7% 9.7% 3 4

63.3% 61.8% 61.3% 1 2 30.5 30.4 29.8 5 5

52.2 33.5 32.5 1 1

2,752 1,967 1,951 1 1

40.3% 45.0% 3 3

33.5% 56.2% 3 4

3.1 2.6 2.5 3 3

17.9 4.9 3.8 2 2

5.1 4.2 5 4

78 87 89 4 2

1.InantMortalityRatepresentedor2009isanaveragerateor20072009.



FinanCial distriCt mn 011

2009 Rank

Popuation









140,133

46.4

$101,794

8.2

7.8%50.5%

10.7%

97.0%

99.0%

0.0%

21

2

3

3721

8

19

7

58

20%

40%

60%

80%

Racial and Ethnic Composition of MN 01 versus New York CityMN 01 in 2000


Households in MN 01 in Each New York City Income Quintile (2009)$0$18,690

$18,690$39,479

$39,479$65,966

$65,966$110,942

$110,942+

13.0% 11.6%17.7%

47.1%

10.1%

MN 01 in 2009 NYC in 2 009NYC in 2000

40%

20%

60%

80%

100%

Modal Share of Transportation to WorkMN 01 Manhattan NYC

CarBikePublic Transportation Walk

Rank Rank

2000 2007 2008 2010 (00) (09/ 10)Rank Rank

2000 2008 2009 2010 (00) (09/10)

Housing

Renta vacancy Rate2



Hoeownership Rate

Index o Housing Price Appreciation (condoiniu)3

median Saes Price per Unit (condoiniu)3

Saes voue


median Rent Burden









Popuation





Poerty Rate

Unepoyent Rate

mean Trae Tie to Work (inutes)




Eeated Bood lead lees (incidence per 1,000 chidren)4

1.CommunitydistrictsMN01andMN02bothallwithinsub-borougharea301.Datareportedatthesub-borougharealevelortheseCDsareidentical.

2.Terentalvacancyrateor2009isanaveragerateor20072009.

3.Rankedouto7communitydistrictswiththesamepredominanthousingtype(condominium).

4.Samplesizeislessthan20newlyidentifedcasesinatleastoneyearpresented.

2.6% 4.8% 34 14

586 857 587 8 11

491 1206 29 0 10 44

25.9% 29.3% 28.8% 30 30

100.0 228.9 189.1 194.1 6

$798,481 $1,018,250 $1,035,956 $980,000 4 6

404 1,477 805 779 33 6

$1,916 $1,999 1

24.6% 25.6% 51

41.8 19.5 20

15.6 39.4 5

0.0% 0.3% 51

2.4% 0.0% 1.8% 58 33

1.4 1.4 1.5 59

5.8 5.7 12.3 59

3.7% 1.8% 44

23.3% 23.2% 24.3% 43 43

0.43 0.39 0.43 42 49

11.4% 18.2% 14.0% 53 53

10.5% 8.5% 10.3% 32 35

9.9% 8.8% 7.9% 49 50

5.8% 3.2% 7.6% 46 47

24.4 24.9 23.4 55 54

66.2% 66.7% 2 2

61.0% 77.3% 2 2

0.9 0.8 0.9 53 54

12.8 11.7 7.2 51 7

More workers in MN 01 walk to work than workers in other areas o

Manhattan, or in New York City as a whole. In 2009, 32 percent o

MN 01 workers drove compared to 21 percent in Manhattan as a whole.

MN 01 has the ourth highest share o workers who both live and work

within the same sub-borough area. Tirty percent o all employed residentswho live in the neighborhood work there.

Getting to Work in New York City

Destination-Origin Ratio

locay Epoyed Residents Share:

Percentage who live and work in the same neighborhood

locay Epoyed Resident Share:

Percentage who work less than half a mile from their home

City-Epoyed Residents Share

5.67

30.2%

14.9%

88.4%



greenwiCh village / soho mn 021

2009 Rank

Popuation









140,133

46.4

$101,794

8.2

3.6%50.5%

46.7%

99.5%

99.9%

6.5%

21

2

3

4521

1

9

3

57

0%

0%

0%

0%




$18,690$39,479

$39,479$65,966

$65,966$110,942

$110,942+

13.0% 11.6%17.7%

47.1%

10.1%

MN 02 in 2009 NYC in 2 009NYC in 2000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Home Purchase Loan Rate (per 1,000 properties)MN 02 NYC

20

40

60

80

0

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Refinance Loan Rate (per 1,000 properties)MN 02 NYC

0

10

20

30

40

50

Rank Rank

2000 2007 2008 2010 (00) (09/ 10)Rank Rank

2000 2008 2009 2010 (00) (09/10)

Housing

Renta vacancy Rate2



Hoeownership Rate



Saes voue


median Rent Burden









Popuation





Poerty Rate

Unepoyent Rate






1.CommunitydistrictsMN01andMN02bothallwithinsub-borougharea301.Datareportedatthesub-borougharealevelortheseCDsareidentical.




2.6% 4.8% 34 14

28 280 177 51 39

31 360 9 0 53 44

25.9% 29.3% 28.8% 30 30

100.0 238.2 204.6 203.6 5

$890,867 $1,672,794 $1,940,032 $1,904,500 1 1

273 415 365 459 41 24

$1,916 $1,999 1

24.6% 25.6% 51

41.8 19.5 20

15.6 39.4 5

0.0% 0.3% 51

2.6 0.0 5.1 2.5 47 53

2.6% 0.4% 0.2% 54 58

15.0 15.2 12.8 48

59.7 60.5 72.9 48

3.7% 1.8% 44

23.3% 23.2% 24.3% 43 43

0.43 0.39 0.43 42 49

11.4% 18.2% 14.0% 53 53

10.5% 8.5% 10.3% 32 35

9.9% 8.8% 7.9% 49 50

5.8% 3.2% 7.6% 46 47

24.4 24.9 23.4 55 54

66.2% 66.7% 2 2

61.0% 77.3% 2 2

0.9 0.8 0.9 53 54

54.9 10.4 6.1 1 11

MN 02 had consistently higher rates o home purchase loans compared to

the rest o the city until 2009. Tough it jumped sharply in 2007, the the

community districts rate ell by 62.8 percent between 2005 and 2009,

while that o the city as a whole ell 60.4 percent during that period.

Like those in the city as a whole, borrowers in MN 02 refnanced their

mortgages at a much lower rate in 2006 compared to 2004. From 2006 to

2008, the refnancing rate in the community district rose slightly, while

that in the city as a whole continued to decline. Te rate in MN 02 rose by

152.7 percent in 2009 while rising by 71.0 percent in the city as a whole.



lower east side / Chinatown mn 03

2009 Rank

Popuation









162,014

93.2

$41,254

8.3

35.0%37.9%

0.3%

99.6%

77.3%

22.5%

4

33

2

1035

29

7

31

35

20%

40%

60%

80%




$18,690$39,479

$39,479$65,966

$65,966$110,942

$110,942+

29.8%

19.7%17.5%

15.3%

17.8%

MN 03 in 2009 NYC in 2 009NYC in 2000

Rank Rank

2000 2007 2008 2010 (00) (09/ 10)Rank Rank

2000 2008 2009 2010 (00) (09/10)

Housing

Renta vacancy Rate1



Hoeownership Rate

Index o Housing Price Appreciation (5+ aiy buiding)2

median Saes Price per Unit (5+ aiy buiding)2

Saes voue


median Rent Burden









Popuation





Poerty Rate

Unepoyent Rate







2.Rankedouto5communitydistrictswiththesamepredominanthousingtype(5+amilybuilding).


2.1% 2.1% 42 50

711 87 94 6 49

229 222 12 0 21 44

12.0% 14.0% 13.4% 46 47

100.0 342.5 282.4 264.1 3

$80,000 $290,988 $194,548 $183,333 1 1

108 270 124 194 49 42

$731 $835 47

30.1% 30.6% 33

19.3 9.7 53

11.5 25.3 18

0.3% 0.0% 52

0.0 0.0 13.1 0.0 56 54

3.2% 0.9% 0.5% 45 57

14.4 14.2 18.0 42

67.9 67.3 81.8 44

4.2% 3.6% 22

40.3% 35.2% 36.5% 17 28

0.72 0.72 0.71 4 4

22.1% 17.1% 19.2% 49 50

13.4% 16.1% 14.0% 17 14

28.4% 27.7% 25.9% 18 16

9.4% 10.1% 9.3% 27 35

30.9 30.3 31.6 50 49

41.0% 50.7% 31 17

36.9% 61.6% 26 21

2.9 2.8 2.9 26 25

32.0 4.8 3.0 2 45

In MN 03, 35 percent o all rental units were subsidized. O these,

69.9 percent were units in NYCHA buildings. Each dot represents a

subsidized rental property.

E14St

Bowery

1Av

StMarksPl

EHoustonSt

DelanceySt

FD

RD

r

All

enSt

Pubic and Subsidized Renta Housing Units



Clinton / Chelsea mn 041

2009 Rank

Popuation









147,472

50.8

$81,767

6.6

19.5%50.9%

3.1%

75.2%

90.0%

18.1%

17

6

14

2020

15

50

23

49

20%

40%

60%

80%




$18,690$39,479

$39,479$65,966

$65,966$110,942

$110,942+

13.3% 14.2%21.9%

37.2%

13.4%

MN 04 in 2009 NYC in 2 009NYC in 2000

Rank Rank

2000 2007 2008 2010 (00) (09/ 10)Rank Rank

2000 2008 2009 2010 (00) (09/10)

Housing

Renta vacancy Rate2



Hoeownership Rate



Saes voue


median Rent Burden









Popuation





Poerty Rate

Unepoyent Rate






1.CommunitydistrictsMN04andMN05bothallwithinsub-borougharea303Datareportedatthesub-borougharealevelortheseCDsareidentical.




3.7% 3.9% 16 24

1021 945 2759 2 1

1151 2896 125 0 3 44

20.2% 24.2% 25.0% 37 34

100.0 254.5 208.1 218.1 2

$829,852 $1,210,665 $1,004,190 $1,091,250 3 4

562 1,354 689 688 22 9

$1,488 $1,652 5

25.9% 25.8% 50

40.2 19.4 21

13.3 35.1 7

0.0% 0.0% 52

4.0 3.9 3.9 0.0 40 54

2.4% 0.4% 1.1% 58 47

12.7 15.8 15.4 45

58.0 71.9 75.9 46

2.4% 3.6% 22

25.3% 22.6% 25.9% 37 40

0.55 0.57 0.55 30 30

8.4% 8.0% 8.7% 54 55

11.4% 9.9% 11.7% 23 28

14.4% 14.2% 12.7% 38 36

7.3% 6.8% 9.5% 37 34

24.8 24.7 25.0 54 53

66.2% 66.7% 2 2

61.0% 77.3% 2 2

2.0 1.6 1.4 36 43

27.8 10.4 2.7 6 52

40%

20%

60%

80%

100%



More workers in MN 01 walk to work than workers in other areas o

Manhattan, or in New York City as a whole. In 2009, 34.6 percent o work-

ers walked to work compared to 23.2 percent in Manhattan as a whole.

Fity percent o all employed residents who live in the neighborhood work

there.








8.94

50.3%

17.1%

88.2%



midtown mn 051

2009 Rank

Popuation









147,472

50.8

$81,767

6.6

19.2%50.9%

8.3%

95.4%

100.0%

0.0%

17

6

14

2220

10

22

1

58

20%

40%

60%

80%




$18,690$39,479

$39,479$65,966

$65,966$110,942

$110,942+

13.3% 14.2%21.9%

37.2%

13.4%

MN 05 in 2009 NYC in 2009NYC in 2000

1974 1990 20001980 2010

Sales Volume (Condominium), 1974-2010

0

300

600

900

1200

1500

Index of Housing Price Appreciation (Condominium), 1974-2010MN 05 NYC

0

50100150200250300

1974 1980 1990 2000 2010

Rank Rank

2000 2007 2008 2010 (00) (09/ 10)Rank Rank

2000 2008 2009 2010 (00) (09/10)

Housing

Renta vacancy Rate2



Hoeownership Rate



Saes voue


median Rent Burden









Popuation





Poerty Rate

Unepoyent Rate






1.CommunitydistrictsMN04andMN05bothallwithinsub-borougharea303Datareportedatthesub-borougharealevelortheseCDsareidentical.


3.Rankedouto7communitydistrictswiththesamepredominanthousingtype(condominium)

4.Samplesizeislessthan20newlyidentifedcasesinatleastoneyearpresented

3.7% 3.9% 16 24

730 592 132 5 46

1174 952 18 17 2 17

20.2% 24.2% 25.0% 37 34

100.0 244.2 204.2 209.0 4

$615,250 $1,448,240 $1,271,318 $1,298,269 6 2

345 1,035 496 593 36 16

$1,488 $1,652 5

25.9% 25.8% 50

40.2 19.4 21

13.3 35.1 7

0.0% 0.0% 52

3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 48 59

6.0 6.2 7.0 56

26.6 27.6 36.7 57

2.4% 3.6% 22

25.3% 22.6% 25.9% 37 40

0.55 0.57 0.55 30 30

8.4% 8.0% 8.7% 54 55

11.4% 9.9% 11.7% 23 28

14.4% 14.2% 12.7% 38 36

7.3% 6.8% 9.5% 37 34

24.8 24.7 25.0 54 53

66.2% 66.7% 2 2

61.0% 77.3% 2 2

2.0 1.6 1.4 36 43

30.2 11.3 10.2 3 2

MN 05 has seen similar price trends in the market or condominiums as

the rest o the city in recent years, despite having a notably high median

sales price o $1.3 million. Prices ell by 16.2 percent in 2009 in the

neighborhood compared to 12.8 percent in the city as a whole. Except in

2009, prices in MN 05 rose in every year since 2000 including a

1.2 percent increase in 2010.

Sales volume or condominiums has allen in recent years, with 577 units

transacting in 2010 compared to 1,293 in 2007.



stuyvesant town / turtle bay mn 06

2009 Rank

Popuation









155,527

96.3

$98,701

4.9

5.6%48.2%

4.9%

98.1%

83.9%

21.2%

3

4

36

4430

11

14

29

38

20%

40%

60%

80%




$18,690$39,479

$39,479$65,966

$65,966$110,942

$110,942+9.4%

15.5%23.0%

43.0%

9.5%

MN 06 in 2009 NYC in 2 009NYC in 2000

40%

20%

60%

80%

100%



Rank Rank

2000 2007 2008 2010 (00) (09/ 10)Rank Rank

2000 2008 2009 2010 (00) (09/10)

Housing

Renta vacancy Rate1



Hoeownership Rate



Saes voue


median Rent Burden









Popuation





Poerty Rate

Unepoyent Rate









2.5% 3.4% 35 30

281 234 142 12 44

495 902 18 0 9 44

26.3% 31.9% 34.1% 28 25

100.0 212.5 195.2 213.0 3

$499,178 $929,614 $762,791 $808,000 7 7

598 1,190 425 578 17 18

$1,781 $1,881 2

25.5% 25.5% 52

27.3 14.6 37

13.5 41.9 3

0.1% 0.0% 52

0.0 3.0 6.0 0.0 56 54

4.6% 0.5% 1.3% 32 43

4.1 4.2 5.4 58

24.5 25.3 29.8 58

3.4% 2.4% 36

24.0% 22.7% 21.0% 40 47

0.40 0.37 0.39 46 51

8.4% 10.2% 11.6% 54 54

14.6% 14.6% 13.3% 11 20

7.9% 6.3% 6.9% 51 52

4.2% 4.4% 9.0% 52 38

25.6 26.8 25.9 53 52

66.2% 66.7% 2 2

61.0% 77.3% 2 2

1.2 1.3 1.1 49 51

16.6 5.3 6.7 38 8

Workers in MN 06 are more likely than workers in the city as a whole

to walk to work. In 2009, 39.4 percent o workers walked compared to

10.7 percent in the city as a whole.

MN 06 has the fth highest destination-origin ratio in New York City.

For every employed resident o the neighborhood, more than three New YorkCity residents come rom other areas o the city to work in the neighborhood.








3.45

23.2%

13.4%

88.2%



uPPer west side mn 07

2009 Rank

Popuation









213,137

63.7

$105,766

7.4

19.1%58.7%

31.8%

100.0%

97.5%

21.2%

11

1

5

2311

2

1

9

38

20%

40%

60%

80%




$18,690$39,479

$39,479$65,966

$65,966$110,942

$110,942+

12.6% 12.6%16.8%

47.8%

10.7%

MN 07 in 2009 NYC in 2 009NYC in 2000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Home Purchase Loan Rate (per 1,000 properties)MN 07 NYC

10

20

30

40

50

1010

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Refinance Loan Rate (per 1,000 properties)MN 07 NYC

0

10

20

30

40

50

Rank Rank

2000 2007 2008 2010 (00) (09/ 10)Rank Rank

2000 2008 2009 2010 (00) (09/10)

Housing

Renta vacancy Rate1



Hoeownership Rate



Saes voue


median Rent Burden









Popuation





Poerty Rate

Unepoyent Rate








3.5% 3.6% 21 26

921 230 1198 3 4

441 1095 0 0 11 44

29.2% 32.4% 34.5% 24 24

100.0 239.4 217.7 239.4 1

$742,389 $1,226,649 $1,067,678 $1,060,000 5 5

79 1,761 964 1,047 54 4

$1,433 $1,663 4

23.4% 23.6% 55

30.4 18.8 24

16.4 51.6 2

0.0% 0.0% 52

1.9 0.0 1.7 0.0 53 54

2.7% 0.9% 0.7% 51 56

11.4 11.7 13.2 47

66.7 68.3 73.1 47

2.7% 1.4% 48

21.3% 21.8% 19.1% 46 51

0.49 0.45 0.45 37 48

14.6% 17.9% 20.8% 51 49

13.4% 13.9% 13.9% 17 15

10.0% 9.9% 8.8% 48 47

4.8% 4.4% 6.6% 51 51

30.3 29.8 29.1 52 51

43.1% 52.9% 27 11

34.5% 59.9% 31 25

1.7 1.4 1.3 41 44

19.0 8.6 6.2 25 10

Home purchase loan rates ollowed the same overall trend in MN 07 as

in city as a whole. Between 2004 and 2009, the rate ell by 60.9 percent in

the community district and 60.8 percent in the city as a whole.

Like the city as a whole, MN 07 saw refnancing rates decline sharply

between 2004 and 2006. From 2006 to 2008, the community district expe-rienced a slight increase in rates, while those o the city as a whole continued

to decline. In 2009, the rate in MN 07 rose by 215.0 percent while it rose by

71.0 percent in the city as a whole.



uPPer east side mn 08

2009 Rank

Popuation









234,133

118.4

$98,817

5.9

7.8%50.3%

10.2%

82.7%

76.8%

22.9%

1

3

18

3722

9

42

33

34

20%

40%

60%

80%




$18,690$39,479

$39,479$65,966

$65,966$110,942

$110,942+8.8%

17.0% 19.2%

46.4%

8.7%

MN 08 in 2009 NYC in 2 009NYC in 2000

Rank Rank

2000 2007 2008 2010 (00) (09/ 10)Rank Rank

2000 2008 2009 2010 (00) (09/10)

Housing

Renta vacancy Rate1



Hoeownership Rate



Saes voue


median Rent Burden









Popuation





Poerty Rate

Unepoyent Rate









2.8% 5.2% 32 10

559 408 571 9 12

241 162 210 0 18 44

30.7% 35.8% 36.4% 22 22

100.0 209.0 176.8 183.9 7

$870,410 $1,313,795 $1,072,993 $1,135,000 2 3

398 982 983 882 34 5

$1,761 $1,735 3

24.4% 26.0% 49

17.7 14.6 37

11.3 37.2 6

0.1% 0.4% 50

2.5 3.2 5.6 9.5 49 43

3.1% 1.1% 1.1% 46 47

8.7 9.8 11.6 49

45.9 51.9 65.0 50

2.2% 1.9% 43

21.5% 23.1% 18.0% 44 52

0.31 0.33 0.31 53 53

13.3% 17.8% 18.8% 52 51

14.2% 16.5% 15.5% 12 9

6.5% 5.4% 5.9% 53 54

3.7% 3.1% 6.3% 55 52

30.7 29.8 29.2 51 50

66.2% 66.7% 2 2

61.0% 77.3% 2 2

0.8 0.6 0.5 55 55

13.6 4.3 3.6 46 33

40%

20%

60%

80%

100%



More workers in MN 08 walk to work than workers in New York City as

a whole. In 2009, 22.0 percent o workers walked to work compared to

10.7 percent in New York City as a whole.

Only 15.5 percent o al l employed residents who live in the neighborhood

work there.








1.26

15.5%

8.6%

88.0%



morningside heights / hamilton mn 09

2009 Rank

Popuation









132,851

99.3

$38,614

7.0

19.3%64.5%

11.1%

99.9%

99.5%

27.1%

2

38

9

219

7

3

6

30

20%

40%

60%

80%




$18,690$39,479

$39,479$65,966

$65,966$110,942

$110,942+

24.8%18.9%

13.3%19.1%

24.5%

MN 09 in 2009 NYC in 2009NYC in 2000

40%

20%

60%

80%

100%



Rank Rank

2000 2007 2008 2010 (00) (09/ 10)Rank Rank

2000 2008 2009 2010 (00) (09/10)

Housing

Renta vacancy Rate1



Hoeownership Rate



Saes voue


median Rent Burden









Popuation





Poerty Rate

Unepoyent Rate









4.3% 3.5% 12 27

0 295 44 57 58

2 136 0 0 58 44

10.9% 14.1% 15.6% 47 44

100.0 374.3 280.4 321.2 2

$46,824 $107,707 $89,252 $85,290 2 5

32 104 65 91 59 48

$917 $965 30

32.5% 31.1% 32

20.0 17.3 28

14.2 31.3 11

0.5% 2.6% 40

66.7 33.9 13.9 18.7 2 29

13.9% 4.3% 6.2% 7 9

103.9 103.3 106.8 12

481.6 478.9 449.1 10

3.6% 2.8% 30

35.0% 33.7% 33.9% 27 31

0.69 0.69 0.70 9 6

30.9% 27.6% 25.8% 40 45

10.0% 11.6% 10.6% 34 33

30.1% 27.4% 25.3% 13 18

16.5% 5.3% 9.6% 10 31

33.8 32.8 32.5 49 47

31.8% 34.0% 45 42

24.7% 44.8% 44 41

3.9 3.5 3.0 15 24

18.7 5.8 3.7 28 32

Workers in MN 09 are more likely than workers in the city as a whole to take

public transportation to work. In 2009, 71.4 percent o MN 09 workers took

public transportation compared to 57.0 percent in the city as a whole.

MN 09 has the third highest share o workers that work outside o

New York City o all the neighborhoods in Manhattan. In MN 09,13.7 percent o workers do not work in the fve boroughs.








0.88

18.4%

14.7%

86.3%



Central harlem mn 10

2009 Rank

Popuation









122,336

85.2

$31,474

7.9

47.2%55.3%

3.2%

97.2%

100.0%

29.0%

6

47

4

614

14

17

1

25

20%

40%

60%

80%




$18,690$39,479

$39,479$65,966

$65,966$110,942

$110,942+

32.9%

16.6% 14.4% 13.9%22.2%

MN 10 in 2009 NYC in 2009NYC in 2000

Rank Rank

2000 2007 2008 2010 (00) (09/ 10)Rank Rank

2000 2008 2009 2010 (00) (09/10)

Housing

Renta vacancy Rate1



Hoeownership Rate



Saes voue


median Rent Burden









Popuation





Poerty Rate

Unepoyent Rate








8.0% 5.0% 1 11

84 676 560 31 13

261 357 96 0 15 44

6.6% 13.0% 15.4% 52 45

100.0 352.9 292.1 237.3 5

$44,798 $122,586 $101,705 $98,691 4 4

119 569 230 257 46 40

$676 $676 54

29.6% 29.5% 37

53.5 18.3 26

10.9 16.0 42

0.6% 5.8% 29

98.0 20.5 31.2 24.6 1 24

14.8% 3.6% 5.4% 3 12

43.5 44.1 41.3 26

206.3 209.2 198.9 25

2.7% 3.1% 27

17.8% 20.5% 20.8% 51 48

0.37 0.57 0.55 50 30

34.0% 31.6% 30.5% 35 33

11.3% 11.5% 10.1% 24 36

36.4% 27.8% 27.1% 8 15

18.6% 8.9% 13.1% 5 10

37.3 36.1 35.5 42 42

28.6% 36.0% 48 39

20.9% 44.6% 52 42

7.5 5.9 5.6 5 10

23.3 4.4 5.7 13 14

In MN 10, 47.2 percent o all rental units were subsidized. O these,



CentralParkN

Ada

mCPow

ellBlv

d

W125St

Lenox

Av

W145St

Fredrick

Dou

glassBlv

d

5Av

W155St




east harlem mn 11

2009 Rank

Popuation









113,328

48.8

$27,973

6.8

68.8%34.0%

0.8%

99.3%

90.1%

41.4%

19

51

11

142

24

11

22

12

20%

40%

60%

80%

Racial and Ethnic Composition of MN11 versus New York CityMN 11 in 2000



$18,690$39,479

$39,479$65,966

$65,966$110,942

$110,942+

35.5%

14.3% 14.8% 11.0%

25.3%

MN 11 in 2009 NYC in 2009NYC in 2000

40%

20%

60%

80%

100%



Rank Rank

2000 2007 2008 2010 (00) (09/ 10)Rank Rank

2000 2008 2009 2010 (00) (09/10)

Housing

Renta vacancy Rate1



Hoeownership Rate



Saes voue


median Rent Burden









Popuation





Poerty Rate

Unepoyent Rate








3.5% 2.7% 21 39

210 164 783 16 6

334 1239 39 248 13 1

6.3% 6.6% 7.9% 54 51

100.0 279.8 277.6 501.8 1

$37,779 $159,618 $118,233 $182,083 5 2

50 181 104 89 58 49

$617 $689 53

27.0% 28.7% 43

22.0 13.7 48

5.1 18.8 37

0.0% 3.2% 37

49.3 14.1 10.7 16.0 3 33

11.9% 1.5% 3.3% 9 20

25.3 23.2 35.0 28

136.8 125.5 221.7 23

3.7% 4.8% 14

21.1% 24.9% 22.7% 47 45

0.59 0.64 0.65 25 16

38.1% 36.1% 30.1% 29 35

11.5% 10.0% 13.5% 22 17

37.1% 27.1% 30.0% 7 10

16.8% 12.9% 16.2% 9 3

35.5 35.7 33.2 47 46

32.5% 37.4% 43 38

25.3% 47.4% 43 37

10.5 8.2 8.9 1 2

19.9 5.4 4.9 21 22

Workers in MN 11 are more likely than workers in Manhattan as a whole

to bike to work. In 2009, 2.6 percent o workers biked to work compared to

1.1 percent in Manhattan as a whole.

MN 11 has the third highest share o workers that leave the neighborhood

to work o all the community districts in Manhattan. In MN 11, 91.1percent o all employees that live in the neighborhood work elsewhere.








0.82

8.9%

5.7%

86.7%


14/14

washington heights / inwood mn 12

2009 Rank

Popuation









208,123

70.3

$37,092

6.3

6.1%89.5%

2.0%

99.7%

99.7%

23.0%

9

42

15

421

18

6

5

33

20%

40%

60%

80%

Racial and Ethnic Composition of MN12 versus New York CityMN 12 in 2000



$18,690$39,479

$39,479$65,966

$65,966$110,942

$110,942+

27.7%

17.5% 17.1%13.0 %

24.7%

MN 12 in 2009 NYC in 2 009NYC in 2000

Rank Rank

2000 2007 2008 2010 (00) (09/ 10)Rank Rank

2000 2008 2009 2010 (00) (09/10)

Housing

Renta vacancy Rate1



Hoeownership Rate



Saes voue


median Rent Burden









Popuation





Poerty Rate

Unepoyent Rate







2.Rankedouto5communitydistrictswiththesamepredominanthousingtype(5+amilybuilding)

2.4% 1.5% 37 55

0 25 69 57 54

127 208 0 0 32 44

6.5% 8.6% 10.6% 53 49

100.0 326.7 249.9 242.5 4

$46,311 $116,457 $77,974 $99,752 3 3

53 129 67 71 57 54

$842 $889 41

31.1% 32.7% 18

26.7 14.3 42

12.6 33.8 9

0.0% 1.2% 48

45.1 32.4 35.8 17.9 4 31

17.9% 7.3% 8.1% 1 3

120.7 120.8 147.9 4

575.9 576.3 625.1 4

3.6% 4.0% 17

53.3% 49.0% 46.6% 5 11

0.43 0.46 0.51 42 39

40.8% 30.5% 28.1% 24 40

9.9% 12.5% 11.9% 35 25

29.8% 24.2% 25.9% 14 16

14.5% 11.9% 15.8% 14 4

40.4 38.7 38.7 36 38

33.8% 29.5% 40 54

27.4% 43.0% 40 48

3.1 2.9 2.6 24 28

11.1 3.9 2.7 54 52

In MN 12, 6.1 percent o all rental units were subsidized. O these,



W155St

W168St

Dyc

kmanSt

Broadw

ay

Amst

erda

mAv

FtWashi

ngto

nAv

W181St

W218St


furman center manhattancb9 2010

Documents