group thinking

Upload: skohli2000

Post on 14-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Group Thinking

    1/8

    Group Think

    A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in acohesive in-group,

    when the members'st r iv ings for unanimi tyoverr idetheir motivation toreal is t ical ly appraise alternat ive cou rses o f act ion(Janis 1972: 9)

    When the desire for unanimity overcomes a groups ability to makerational assessments on all available information

    Can include an unquestioned belief in your moral correctnessreligious (give your life to God) or political (Nazi Germany)

    Reduces team effectiveness because it can remove the ability/need to

    question or validate

  • 7/29/2019 Group Thinking

    2/8

    Group behaviour

    Group Behaviour -Positive and provides for trust, belonging, reliance,

    Resulting in being happy at work - better more efficient service

    Like minded people with similar ideas expectations

    Did not join public service to make a fortune

    Joined toserve

    make a difference

    belongget self esteem (Maslow 1987)

    Develop identityFitting-in (Baigent 2001)

    Surface acting that develops into deep acting (Hochschild 1983)

    Culture can inclusiveRealise needs (Maslow 1987)

    Avoid alienation (Marx)

    Resisting deskilling (Braverman 1974)

    Culture can be negative

    Racism (Macpherson 1999)Sexism (Baigent 2008)

    Resist modernisation (Baigent 2007)

    Outsiders seen as theother (civvies)

    naive (what do they know about doing the job)

    deviant stereotyping (sanctions taken against groups)

    What are the stereotypes associated with being black? How might these affect a black male who wants to join the police?

    What are the stereotypes associated with women how will this effect women who want to join the fire and rescue service?

  • 7/29/2019 Group Thinking

    3/8

    Forming a society

    Jones (1994) suggests that Durkheim has an orthodox consensus view of social structuresmade up of norms, values and rules.

    Durkheim argues we learn about norms, values and rules through socialisation

    Norms values and rules serve the function of making social life possible

    Each generation of people pass on these norms, values and rules to the next (tradition)

    Functionalists believe in a society formed by social structures

    Structures that become real in their consequences (W I Thomas) The argument of functionalist is that any social process exists because they serve a

    function

    For example we have laws because they lay down the boundaries of what is acceptable ina society

    Durkheim uses the term social solidarity to describe how people achieve social order

    Social solidaritywas achieved by collective standards and rules of behaviour that make thesocial glue that holds society together

    Social solidarity/order flows from consensus - the existence of shared norms, values and

    rules When individuals do not feel they belong in a society share the same norms and values

    they feel alienated a situation that Durkheim saw as anomie

    Mayo, recognise that workers at Hawthorn suffered from anomie they did not feel as isthey belonged during his experiment he made them feel important that they belongedand therefore they were happier and worked harder.

  • 7/29/2019 Group Thinking

    4/8

    Durkheim

    A collective way of living/being can be termeda culture

    Cultures can be macro gender, ethnicity,class

    Cultures can be micro family, work,teenagers

    Each generation has the ability to change theirculture

    People have a choice if they comply or not In Public Services there are two cultures

    Formal

    Informal

  • 7/29/2019 Group Thinking

    5/8

    Tuckman, B. (1965) 'Developmental sequence in small groups', Psycho logical Bul let in63(6):

    Forming

    Identifying the task and how to accomplish it.

    Deciding what is acceptable group behaviour and how tohandle group conflict

    Deciding what information needs to be gathered to tacklethe task

    Abstract conceptual discussions or some members'impatience with these discussions

    No clear focus on task or problem as evidenced by

    irrelevant discussions Complaining about organisational problems and barriers

    to accomplishing the task instead of focusing on the task

  • 7/29/2019 Group Thinking

    6/8

    Storming

    Arguing among group members, even if

    they agree on the issues

    Choosing sides within the group, bids for

    power, drawing divisional lines

    Tension, jealousy, lack of unity, and a

    perceived hierarchy

    Establishing unobtainable goals, increased

    concerns about too much work to be done.

  • 7/29/2019 Group Thinking

    7/8

    Norming

    Conflict avoidance in an attempt to promoteharmony

    Friendlier discussions on a more personal level,

    more discussions about the dynamics of thegroup, begin to confide in one another

    More of a sense of group cohesion and esprit,more commonality of goals

    Establishing and maintaining realistic groupparameters for behaviour and performance

    Organising how team will sanction transgressors

  • 7/29/2019 Group Thinking

    8/8

    Performing

    Constructively changing one's self--

    actually changing for the betterment of the

    group.

    Ability to avoid group conflict and, should

    conflict arise, being able to work through it.

    Much closer identity with the group,

    understanding each other's strengths and

    weaknesses.