***gs strategy group treasure valley metro research september 20, 2016 … · ***gs strategy group...
TRANSCRIPT
***GS Strategy Group
Treasure Valley Metro Research
September 20, 2016
Table 1-1
Q1. First, to make sure we get a representative sample, can you please tell me your current age?
Total
-------
Total 1000
18-34 28.6
18-29 20.5
30-34 8.1
35-44 21.9
35-39 11.3
40-44 10.6
45-54 17.0
55-64 16.2
55-60 10.5
61-64 5.7
65+ 16.3
Table 2-1
Q2. And before we begin, please tell me, do you currently live in Ada, Canyon or Owhyee County - yes or no?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent yes minus percent no)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Yes 100.0
NET DIF 1 100.0
Table 3-1
Q3. Not everyone votes in every election, but in general, when there is an election for President of the United States, do you always
vote, almost always vote, vote most of the time, vote some of the time, hardly ever vote or never vote?
Total
-------
Total 1000
Always 78.6
Almost always 9.9
Most of time 5.5
Sometimes 2.4
Hardly ever 1.0
Never 2.6
Table 4-1
Q4. Which of the following best describes you?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent born in minus percent born outside)
Total
-------
Total 1000
I was born in the Treasure 30.3
Valley and have chosen to
live here as an adult
I was born outside of the 69.0
Treasure Valley and moved
here to live
DK/Refused 0.7
NET DIF 1 -38.7
Table 5-1
Q5A. What was the one, main reason you stayed in the Treasure Valley?
Total
-------
Total 303
Family 36.3
General like/love of the 13.2
area
Born here 11.6
Work 11.6
Quality of life 8.6
Environment 8.6
Lifestyle 4.3
School/college 2.3
Other 1.3
Don't know/Refused 2.3
Table 6-1
Q5B. What was the one, main reason you moved to the Treasure Valley?
Total
-------
Total 690
Family 43.0
Employment 28.7
Quality of life 9.1
College 6.5
Environment/outdoors/ 5.7
landscape/weather
Cost of living 3.6
Other 1.6
Don't know/Refused 1.7
Table 7-1
Q6. What town or city do you live in or nearest to?
Total
-------
Total 1000
Ada 73.6
Boise 52.8
Eagle 3.7
Garden City 0.6
Hidden Spring 0.1
Kuna 2.0
Meridian 12.8
Star 1.6
Canyon 24.1
Bowmont 0.5
Caldwell 7.1
Greenleaf 0.2
Melba 1.2
Middleton 2.4
Nampa 11.4
Notus 0.3
Parma 0.6
Riverside 0.1
Wilder 0.3
Owyhee 1.8
Bruneau 0.5
Grand View 0.3
Homedale 0.3
Marsing 0.5
Riddle 0.2
DK/Refused 0.5
Table 8-1
Q7. What is the most important issue facing Idaho today?
Total
-------
Total 1000
Education 22.6
Jobs & Economy 20.1
The Government in general 5.6
Health Care 5.5
Immigration 4.0
Growth/Overpopulation 3.3
Climate change/The 3.1
Environment/water
Moral Issues 2.6
Taxes/Budget & Funding 2.5
Low Wages 2.4
Gun Laws/2nd Amendment 2.4
Presidential Election 2.2
Land 1.9
Roads/Infrastructure 1.8
Terrorism/National Security 1.4
Affordable Housing/ 0.8
Affordable Living
Water 0.6
Other 2.2
Don't Know/Refused 15.0
Table 9-1
Q8. Generally speaking, how would rate the quality of life in the Treasure Valley Region?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Excellent/Good 92.1
Excellent 49.3
Good 42.8
Fair/Poor 7.4
Fair 6.2
Poor 1.2
DK/Refused 0.5
Mean 1.6
NET DIF 1 84.7
Table 10-1
Q9. And thinking specifically about your own neighborhood, how would rate the quality of life?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Excellent/Good 91.3
Excellent 52.5
Good 38.8
Fair/Poor 8.4
Fair 6.3
Poor 2.1
DK/Refused 0.3
Mean 1.6
NET DIF 1 82.9
Table 11-1
Q10. Would you say that the Treasure Valley is growing too fast, too slow or about right?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent too fast minus percent too slow)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Too fast 44.5
Too slow 2.8
About right 50.3
DK/Refused 2.4
NET DIF 1 41.7
Table 12-1
Q11. Which of the following is the best reason to live in the Treasure Valley?
Total
-------
Total 1000
Crime and safety 31.7
The cost of living 29.7
Good jobs and a strong 13.7
economy
The quality of education 5.7
Lack of traffic and 5.4
congestion
Low taxes 3.2
DK/Refused 10.6
Table 13-1
Q12A. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: The Treasure Valley is a good place to work and build
a career.
(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)
Total
-------
Total 504
Agree 81.9
Strongly Agree 48.4
Somewhat Agree 33.5
Disagree 12.7
Somewhat Disagree 6.7
Strongly Disagree 6.0
DK/Refused 5.4
Mean 1.7
NET DIF 1 69.2
Table 14-1
Q12B. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: The Treasure Valley is a good place to raise a family.
(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)
Total
-------
Total 496
Agree 95.6
Strongly Agree 73.6
Somewhat Agree 22.0
Disagree 3.0
Somewhat Disagree 1.4
Strongly Disagree 1.6
DK/Refused 1.4
Mean 1.3
NET DIF 1 92.5
Table 15-1
Q13. In general, how would you rate the national economy in the United States today?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Excellent/Good 28.7
Excellent 5.3
Good 23.4
Fair/Poor 69.9
Fair 38.3
Poor 31.6
DK/Refused 1.4
Mean 3.0
NET DIF 1 -41.2
Table 16-1
Q14. And how would you rate the economy here in the Treasure Valley?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Excellent/Good 64.8
Excellent 13.5
Good 51.3
Fair/Poor 33.9
Fair 26.9
Poor 7.0
DK/Refused 1.3
Mean 2.3
NET DIF 1 30.9
Table 17-1
Q15. Which of the following sectors is most important to the Treasure Valley economy?
Total
-------
Total 1000
Agriculture 24.3
Small business 18.0
High tech 17.2
Education 10.3
Healthcare 9.7
Construction 9.0
The service industry 2.6
Banking and finance 1.1
DK/Refused 7.8
Table 18-1
Q16. Over the next year do you think you or your family's personal financial situation will get better, worse or stay about the same?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent better minus percent worse)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Better 31.2
Worse 9.1
Stay the same 58.3
DK/Refused 1.4
NET DIF 1 22.1
Table 19-1
Q17. Over the next year do you think unemployment rate in the Treasure Valley will go up, down or stay the same?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent up minus percent down)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Up 19.6
Down 20.8
Stay the same 54.4
DK/Refused 5.2
NET DIF 1 -1.2
Table 20-1
Q18. Over the next year do you think housing costs in the Treasure Valley will go up, down or stay the same?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent up minus percent down)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Up 75.9
Down 5.0
Stay the same 15.5
DK/Refused 3.6
NET DIF 1 70.9
Table 21-1
Q19. Over the next year do you think healthcare costs in the Treasure Valley will go up, down or stay the same?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent up minus percent down)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Up 74.5
Down 2.4
Stay the same 19.0
DK/Refused 4.1
NET DIF 1 72.1
Table 22-1
Q20. Over the next year do you think gas costs in the Treasure Valley will go up, down or stay the same?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent up minus percent down)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Up 56.7
Down 3.6
Stay the same 33.5
DK/Refused 6.2
NET DIF 1 53.1
Table 23-1
Q21. Compared to nearby communities, would you say your taxes are higher, lower or about the same?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent higher minus percent lower)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Higher 26.5
Lower 15.1
About the same 49.8
DK/Refused 8.6
NET DIF 1 11.4
Table 24-1
Q22. Which level of government do you most often look to for services?
Total
-------
Total 1000
Federal 11.3
State 21.2
County 20.4
City 33.1
DK/Refused 14.0
Table 25-1
Q23. And from the same list, which level of government do you think should be providing you the most services?
Total
-------
Total 1000
Federal 13.8
State 35.6
County 13.9
City 27.9
DK/Refused 8.8
Table 26-1
Q24. Considering what you pay in taxes, would you say the government services you receive are excellent, good, fair or poor?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Excellent/Good 48.2
Excellent 10.2
Good 38.0
Fair/Poor 49.2
Fair 29.3
Poor 19.9
DK/Refused 2.6
Mean 2.6
NET DIF 1 -1.0
Table 27-1
Q25. Currently, only a few Idaho resort cities have a local sales tax in addition to the state sales tax. These local sales taxes are
sometimes also referred to as local "option" taxes because the taxes are decided by the voters in the community affected. These funds
go to support infrastructure and other projects in the community. Would you favor or oppose giving every city in Idaho the ability to
vote on a local option tax?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent favor minus percent oppose)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Favor 62.0
Strongly Favor 33.2
Somewhat Favor 28.8
Oppose 32.2
Somewhat Oppose 12.3
Strongly Oppose 19.9
DK/Refused 5.8
Mean 2.2
NET DIF 1 29.8
Table 28-1
Q26. And if your town or city were to propose a local option tax, would you favor or oppose that plan?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent favor minus percent oppose)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Favor 41.8
Strongly Favor 20.4
Somewhat Favor 21.4
Oppose 47.8
Somewhat Oppose 16.9
Strongly Oppose 30.9
DK/Refused 10.4
Mean 2.7
NET DIF 1 -6.0
Table 29-1
Q27. Generally speaking, how would you rate the quality of education in Idaho's K-12 public schools?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Excellent/Good 39.2
Excellent 8.3
Good 30.9
Fair/Poor 54.8
Fair 31.9
Poor 22.9
DK/Refused 6.0
Mean 2.7
NET DIF 1 -15.6
Table 30-1
Q28. And thinking specifically about your school district, how would you rate the quality of K-12 public schools in your area?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Excellent/Good 49.7
Excellent 13.2
Good 36.5
Fair/Poor 41.2
Fair 25.5
Poor 15.7
DK/Refused 9.1
Mean 2.5
NET DIF 1 8.5
Table 31-1
Q29. If your school district were to receive additional funding, which of the following should be the highest priority of education
funding?
Total
-------
Total 1000
Raise teacher salaries to 25.4
retain existing teachers
Increase starting teacher 16.1
salaries to attract new
teachers
Technology in the classroom 12.9
New books and supplies for 9.9
students
Extra-Curriculars such as 7.8
athletics and music programs
Professional development for 5.9
existing teachers
School Facilities and 5.7
Maintenance
School Safety 2.6
None 2.1
All 8.2
DK/Refused 3.4
Table 32-1
Q30. And from the same list, which should be the second highest priority?
Total
-------
Total 1000
Raise teacher salaries to 16.7
retain existing teachers
Increase starting teacher 14.8
salaries to attract new
teachers
Technology in the classroom 14.0
Extra-Curriculars such as 12.6
athletics and music programs
New books and supplies for 10.7
students
Professional development for 7.7
existing teachers
School Facilities and 7.2
Maintenance
School Safety 3.8
None 2.3
All 5.9
DK/Refused 4.3
Table 33-1
Q31A. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: My school district should raise additional tax revenue
to increase education funding.
(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)
Total
-------
Total 504
Agree 49.0
Strongly Agree 23.2
Somewhat Agree 25.8
Disagree 44.2
Somewhat Disagree 18.7
Strongly Disagree 25.6
DK/Refused 6.7
Mean 2.5
NET DIF 1 4.8
Table 34-1
Q31B. A recent study shows the state of Idaho ranks 49th out of the 50 states in per-pupil funding. Please tell me whether you agree or
disagree with the following statement: My school district should raise additional tax revenue to increase education funding.
(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)
Total
-------
Total 496
Agree 51.6
Strongly Agree 26.2
Somewhat Agree 25.4
Disagree 43.1
Somewhat Disagree 19.6
Strongly Disagree 23.6
DK/Refused 5.2
Mean 2.4
NET DIF 1 8.5
Table 35-1
Q32. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: Access to high-quality, affordable preschool is
beneficial to educational performance later in life?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Agree 71.2
Strongly Agree 50.9
Somewhat Agree 20.3
Disagree 23.1
Somewhat Disagree 10.9
Strongly Disagree 12.2
DK/Refused 5.7
Mean 1.8
NET DIF 1 48.1
Table 36-1
Q33. Would you be willing to spend more in taxes to support access to high-quality, affordable preschool in your school district - yes
or no?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent yes minus percent no)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Yes 51.9
No 43.1
DK/Refused 5.0
NET DIF 1 8.8
Table 37-1
Q34. How do you typically commute to work?
Total
-------
Total 1000
Driving 59.5
Biking 4.3
Walking 1.9
Public Transportation 0.7
Don't work 24.0
Work from home 8.2
DK/Refused 1.4
Table 38-1
Q35. In minutes, how long is your typical commute to work?
Total
-------
Total 664
Don't work 2.0
1-20 minutes 63.9
Less than 5 minutes 6.9
6-10 minutes 17.3
11-20 minutes 39.6
21-60 minutes 30.4
21-30 minutes 20.9
31-45 minutes 7.5
46-60 minutes 2.0
Over one hour 2.3
DK/Refused 1.5
Table 39-1
Q36. Which of the following statements comes closest to your own opinion?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent enough minus percent more)
Total
-------
Total 1000
There are enough mass 27.8
transportation options in
the Treasure Valley
The Treasure Valley could 66.8
use more mass transportation
options
DK/Refused 5.4
NET DIF 1 -39.0
Table 40-1
Q37. If the Treasure Valley were going to build more mass transit, which of the following funding sources would you prefer?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent tax minus percent none)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Tax 75.1
Sales Tax 23.2
Gas Tax 29.3
Property Tax 10.1
Income Tax 12.5
No Taxes/Don't Want to Build 18.2
DK/Refused 6.7
NET DIF 1 56.9
Table 41-1
Q38A. Would you say that you favor or oppose building a new commuter rail service on existing rail line to link major residential,
entertainment and employment centers throughout the Treasure Valley?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent favor minus percent oppose)
Total
-------
Total 504
Favor 64.9
Strongly Favor 37.5
Somewhat Favor 27.4
Oppose 27.8
Somewhat Oppose 11.3
Strongly Oppose 16.5
DK/Refused 7.3
Mean 2.1
NET DIF 1 37.1
Table 42-1
Q38B. If there were a funding mechanism such as a local option sales tax that could pay for some of the associated costs with building
a new commuter rail service on existing rail line to link major residential, entertainment and employment centers throughout the
Treasure Valley, would you favor or oppose that plan?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent favor minus percent oppose)
Total
-------
Total 496
Favor 56.9
Strongly Favor 34.1
Somewhat Favor 22.8
Oppose 37.1
Somewhat Oppose 14.9
Strongly Oppose 22.2
DK/Refused 6.0
Mean 2.3
NET DIF 1 19.8
Table 43-1
Q39A. Some local governments have recently allocated increased funding to address the lack of affordable housing in the Treasure
Valley. Would you say you favor or oppose spending government money to build low-income housing facilities?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent favor minus percent oppose)
Total
-------
Total 504
Favor 55.6
Strongly Favor 30.0
Somewhat Favor 25.6
Oppose 38.7
Somewhat Oppose 16.9
Strongly Oppose 21.8
DK/Refused 5.8
Mean 2.3
NET DIF 1 16.9
Table 44-1
Q39B. It is estimated that over 30% of Boise residents qualify for affordable housing, yet over 10,000 additional affordable housing
units throughout the Treasure Valley are needed to house them. Some local governments have recently allocated increased funding to
address the lack of affordable housing in the Treasure Valley. Would you say you favor or oppose spending government money to build
low-income housing facilities?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent favor minus percent oppose)
Total
-------
Total 496
Favor 59.3
Strongly Favor 30.4
Somewhat Favor 28.8
Oppose 35.7
Somewhat Oppose 14.1
Strongly Oppose 21.6
DK/Refused 5.0
Mean 2.3
NET DIF 1 23.6
Table 45-1
Q40. Do you think the majority of residents in your city can afford to buy a home - yes or no?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent yes minus percent no)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Yes 43.8
No 49.4
DK/Refused 6.8
NET DIF 1 -5.6
Table 46-1
Q41. In general, would you say that homelessness in the Treasure Valley is a major problem, somewhat of a problem, small problem or not
a problem at all?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent major/somewhat minus percent small/not problem)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Major/Somewhat 64.1
Major 14.7
Somewhat 49.4
Small/Not Problem 33.5
Small 27.6
Not a problem 5.9
DK/Refused 2.4
NET DIF 1 30.6
Table 47-1
Q42. And in the past year would you say homelessness in the Treasure Valley has gotten better, gotten worse or stayed about the same?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent better minus percent worse)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Better 7.9
Worse 29.4
Stayed about the same 52.7
DK/Refused 10.0
NET DIF 1 -21.5
Table 48-1
Q43. In general, who should be most responsible for solving homelessness in the Treasure Valley?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent privately minus percent publicly)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Privately funded 42.3
organizations like
non-profits and religious
charities
Publicly funded government 45.6
programs
DK/Refused 12.1
NET DIF 1 -3.3
Table 49-1
Q44A. How concerned are you about the loss of farmland as a result of urban growth in the Treasure Valley - extremely, very, somewhat
or not at all?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent extremely/very minus percent somewhat/not)
Total
-------
Total 504
Extremely/Very 47.0
Extremely 24.4
Very 22.6
Somewhat/Not 51.6
Somewhat 31.9
Not at all 19.6
DK/Refused 1.4
NET DIF 1 -4.6
Table 50-1
Q44B. And how concerned are you about the loss of family farmers as a result of urban growth in the Treasure Valley - extremely, very,
somewhat or not at all?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent extremely/very minus percent somewhat/not)
Total
-------
Total 496
Extremely/Very 46.2
Extremely 26.2
Very 20.0
Somewhat/Not 51.8
Somewhat 32.5
Not at all 19.4
DK/Refused 2.0
NET DIF 1 -5.6
Table 51-1
Q45. Which should be the priority in the Treasure Valley?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent increase minus percent preserve)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Increasing affordable 32.2
housing
Preserving farmland 57.2
DK/Refused 10.6
NET DIF 1 -25.0
Table 52-1
Q46A. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: Agriculture is an important part of the economy in the
Treasure Valley.
(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)
Total
-------
Total 504
Agree 93.7
Strongly Agree 63.3
Somewhat Agree 30.4
Disagree 3.6
Somewhat Disagree 2.4
Strongly Disagree 1.2
DK/Refused 2.8
Mean 1.4
NET DIF 1 90.1
Table 53-1
Q46B. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: Agriculture is an important part of the culture in the
Treasure Valley.
(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)
Total
-------
Total 496
Agree 93.1
Strongly Agree 69.6
Somewhat Agree 23.6
Disagree 6.7
Somewhat Disagree 4.0
Strongly Disagree 2.6
DK/Refused 0.2
Mean 1.4
NET DIF 1 86.5
Table 54-1
Q47. In the past year, would you say there has been more crime, less crime, or about the same amount of crime in your neighborhood?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent more minus percent less)
Total
-------
Total 1000
More 18.4
Less 14.6
About the same 63.9
DK/Refused 3.1
NET DIF 1 3.8
Table 55-1
Q48. In general, how would you describe the neighborhood where you live - extremely safe, very safe, somewhat safe or not safe at all?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent extremely/very minus percent somewhat/not)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Extremely/Very 81.8
Extremely safe 32.5
Very safe 49.3
Somewhat/Not 17.7
Somewhat safe 15.6
Not safe at all 2.1
DK/Refused 0.5
NET DIF 1 64.1
Table 56-1
Q49. And how would you rate the relationship between the police and residents in your community?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Excellent/Good 85.6
Excellent 37.1
Good 48.5
Fair/Poor 12.3
Fair 8.3
Poor 4.0
DK/Refused 2.1
Mean 1.8
NET DIF 1 73.3
Table 57-1
Q50. We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. Here is a seven-point scale on which the political views that
people might hold are arranged from very liberal to very conservative. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you
thought much about this?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent Conservative minus percent Liberal)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Liberal 26.4
Very Liberal 7.8
Liberal 7.2
Somewhat liberal 11.4
Moderate 23.9
Conservative 40.7
Somewhat conservative 14.1
Conservative 12.3
Very Conservative 14.3
DK/Refused 9.0
NET DIF 1 14.3
Table 58-1
Q51. Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent Republican minus percent Liberal)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Republican 41.0
Strong Republican 20.4
Not very strong 9.7
Republican
Independent lean 10.9
Republican
Democrat 28.5
Strong Democrat 15.3
Not very strong 4.5
Democrat
Independent lean 8.7
Democrat
Pure Independent 20.6
Other 4.3
DK/Refused 5.6
NET DIF 1 12.5
Table 59-1
Q52. What racial or ethnic group best describes you?
Total
-------
Total 1000
White 88.1
Non-White 9.5
Latino or Hispanic 3.0
Black 1.8
Asian 0.5
Native American 0.8
Other 1.8
Two or more 1.6
DK/Refused 2.4
Table 60-1
Q53. What is the highest level of education or training you have completed?
Total
-------
Total 1000
High school 18.7
Some high school 2.7
High school degree or 16.0
equivalent
Some College/Assoc 33.9
Some college 20.6
Associate's Degree 13.3
Bachelor's Degree 27.5
Graduate school 18.5
Some graduate school 3.0
Graduate degree 15.5
DK/Refused 1.4
Table 61-1
Q54. What is your religion?
Total
-------
Total 1000
Non-denominational Christian 21.0
Mainstream Protestant 19.1
Catholic 12.3
Mormon 9.5
Jewish 0.7
Atheist/Agnostic 9.1
Other 6.8
No Religion 15.2
DK/Refused 6.3
Table 62-1
Q55. What is your relationship status?
Total
-------
Total 1000
Married 60.1
Single 16.9
In a relationship 9.9
Widowed 5.9
Divorced 5.3
DK/Refused 1.9
Table 63-1
Q56. Do you currently have any children enrolled in K-12 schooling?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent yes minus percent no)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Yes 32.2
No 66.6
DK/Refused 1.2
NET DIF 1 -34.4
Table 64-1
Q57. Do your children attend public, private or charter schools?
Total
-------
Total 322
Public 73.6
Private 10.6
Charter 12.7
DK/Refused 3.1
Table 65-1
Q59. Do you currently rent or own your home?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent rent minus percent own)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Rent 22.5
Own 74.4
DK/Refused 3.1
NET DIF 1 -51.9
Table 66-1
Q60. And finally, which of the following best describes your annual household income before taxes?
Total
-------
Total 1000
<$50,000 33.5
Under $25,000 12.8
$25,001-$50,000 20.7
$50,001 to $100,000 26.7
$50,001 to $75,000 17.1
$75,001 to $100,000 9.6
Over $100,000 16.8
DK/Refused 23.0
Table 67-1
Q61. Gender:
(NET DIF 1 - Percent male minus percent female)
Total
-------
Total 1000
Male 51.0
Female 49.0
NET DIF 1 2.0
Table 68-1
Version
Total
-------
Total 1000
Version A 50.4
Version B 49.6
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 1-1
Q1. First, to make sure we get a representative sample, can you please tell me your current age?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
18-34 286 28.6% 29.8 27.3 100.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.3 23.3 15.8 23.4 33.5 32.6
18-29 205 20.5% 22.0 19.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.6 16.7 15.8 15.9 24.3 24.9
30-34 81 8.1% 7.8 8.4 0.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 6.7 0.0 7.6 9.2 7.7
35-44 219 21.9% 20.8 23.1 0.0 73.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.3 21.3 21.1 23.4 24.3 20.4
35-39 113 11.3% 10.6 12.0 0.0 37.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.4 8.3 10.5 12.9 11.7 10.2
40-44 106 10.6% 10.2 11.0 0.0 35.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.9 12.9 10.5 10.5 12.6 10.2
45-54 170 17.0% 19.6 14.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 17.4 16.7 10.5 19.3 15.5 16.8
55-64 162 16.2% 14.7 17.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 16.8 13.3 31.6 17.6 14.1 14.4
55-60 105 10.5% 10.2 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.8 0.0 11.8 5.8 21.1 11.5 10.7 9.1
61-64 57 5.7% 4.5 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.2 0.0 5.0 7.5 10.5 6.1 3.4 5.3
65+ 163 16.3% 15.1 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 13.2 25.4 21.1 16.3 12.6 15.8
PAGE 1
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 2-1
Q2. And before we begin, please tell me, do you currently live in Ada, Canyon or Owhyee County - yes or no?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent yes minus percent no)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Yes 1000 100.0% 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
NET DIF 1 1000 100.0% 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
PAGE 2
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 3-1
Q3. Not everyone votes in every election, but in general, when there is an election for President of the United States, do you always vote, almost always vote, vote most
of the time, vote some of the time, hardly ever vote or never vote?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Always 786 78.6% 79.8 77.3 76.1 78.3 84.1 80.9 74.2 80.8 74.2 42.1 79.5 78.6 79.6
Almost always 99 9.9% 9.6 10.2 10.2 9.0 10.6 10.5 9.8 8.3 13.8 26.3 11.7 8.3 9.1
Most of time 55 5.5% 6.1 4.9 3.9 6.3 3.5 5.6 8.0 4.9 6.7 15.8 3.9 5.3 5.6
Sometimes 24 2.4% 1.8 3.1 3.9 2.0 0.6 1.2 4.3 2.7 1.7 0.0 2.2 2.4 2.5
Hardly ever 10 1.0% 0.8 1.2 1.0 1.3 0.6 0.0 1.8 0.8 1.7 0.0 1.2 1.5 0.4
Never 26 2.6% 2.0 3.3 4.9 3.0 0.6 1.9 1.8 2.4 2.1 15.8 1.5 3.9 2.8
PAGE 3
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 4-1
Q4. Which of the following best describes you?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent born in minus percent born outside)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
I was born in the Treasure 303 30.3% 29.2 31.4 42.4 28.0 27.6 30.2 22.1 29.2 32.9 42.1 29.3 26.2 35.1
Valley and have chosen to
live here as an adult
I was born outside of the 690 69.0% 69.6 68.4 56.6 71.0 71.8 69.8 77.3 70.1 66.3 57.9 70.2 72.3 64.9
Treasure Valley and moved
here to live
DK/Refused 7 0.7% 1.2 0.2 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.5 1.5 0.0
NET DIF 1 -387 -38.7% -40.4 -36.9 -14.1 -43.0 -44.1 -39.5 -55.2 -40.9 -33.3 -15.8 -41.0 -46.1 -29.8
PAGE 4
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 5-1
Q5A. What was the one, main reason you stayed in the Treasure Valley?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 303 303 149 154 87 84 47 49 36 215 79 8 120 54 100
Family 110 36.3% 26.8 45.5 39.1 47.6 23.4 36.7 19.4 33.5 48.1 0.0 32.5 37.0 37.0
General like/love of the 40 13.2% 10.1 16.2 9.2 13.1 17.0 10.2 22.2 12.1 11.4 62.5 15.0 5.6 12.0
area
Born here 35 11.6% 10.1 13.0 5.7 10.7 4.3 18.4 27.8 12.6 8.9 12.5 8.3 13.0 14.0
Work 35 11.6% 15.4 7.8 13.8 10.7 8.5 12.2 11.1 14.0 6.3 0.0 16.7 11.1 8.0
Quality of life 26 8.6% 13.4 3.9 10.3 9.5 14.9 2.0 2.8 8.8 7.6 12.5 7.5 7.4 13.0
Environment 26 8.6% 11.4 5.8 6.9 6.0 17.0 6.1 11.1 9.3 7.6 0.0 8.3 13.0 6.0
Lifestyle 13 4.3% 4.7 3.9 1.1 2.4 12.8 8.2 0.0 3.7 6.3 0.0 7.5 3.7 2.0
School/college 7 2.3% 3.4 1.3 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 1.3 0.0 1.7 3.7 3.0
Other 4 1.3% 2.0 0.6 2.3 0.0 2.1 0.0 2.8 1.9 0.0 0.0 1.7 3.7 0.0
Don't know/Refused 7 2.3% 2.7 1.9 3.4 0.0 0.0 6.1 2.8 1.4 2.5 12.5 0.8 1.9 5.0
PAGE 5
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 6-1
Q5B. What was the one, main reason you moved to the Treasure Valley?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 690 690 355 335 116 213 122 113 126 516 159 11 288 149 185
Family 297 43.0% 31.8 54.9 37.1 41.3 40.2 43.4 54.0 40.5 50.3 54.5 44.4 39.6 47.0
Employment 198 28.7% 34.1 23.0 21.6 38.5 25.4 30.1 20.6 31.8 19.5 9.1 29.9 27.5 29.2
Quality of life 63 9.1% 10.7 7.5 7.8 8.0 14.8 6.2 9.5 8.5 11.9 0.0 10.8 8.7 4.9
College 45 6.5% 7.6 5.4 19.8 4.2 4.1 4.4 2.4 7.2 3.8 18.2 3.5 7.4 10.3
Environment/outdoors/ 39 5.7% 6.2 5.1 6.0 2.8 5.7 8.8 7.1 5.4 6.3 9.1 6.3 6.7 4.3
landscape/weather
Cost of living 25 3.6% 5.4 1.8 3.4 3.8 5.7 4.4 0.8 4.3 1.9 0.0 2.8 6.0 2.2
Other 11 1.6% 2.5 0.6 0.9 0.5 3.3 0.0 4.0 1.0 3.8 0.0 1.7 2.7 0.5
Don't know/Refused 12 1.7% 1.7 1.8 3.4 0.9 0.8 2.7 1.6 1.4 2.5 9.1 0.7 1.3 1.6
PAGE 6
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 7-1
Q6. What town or city do you live in or nearest to?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Ada 736 73.6% 73.5 73.7 77.6 76.0 75.3 76.5 59.5 100.0 0.0 0.0 71.5 74.3 78.2
Boise 528 52.8% 53.5 52.0 62.0 53.3 52.4 50.6 42.9 71.7 0.0 0.0 43.9 54.4 66.3
Eagle 37 3.7% 3.1 4.3 2.0 4.7 1.8 4.9 4.9 5.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 3.4 2.8
Garden City 6 0.6% 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.6 1.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.4
Hidden Spring 1 0.1% 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Kuna 20 2.0% 1.2 2.9 1.0 2.0 2.4 4.3 0.6 2.7 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.4 0.7
Meridian 128 12.8% 13.5 12.0 10.2 13.7 16.5 14.2 9.2 17.4 0.0 0.0 18.8 10.2 6.7
Star 16 1.6% 1.6 1.6 2.4 2.0 0.6 1.9 0.6 2.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 3.4 1.4
Canyon 240 24.0% 23.9 24.1 19.5 22.3 23.5 19.8 37.4 0.0 100.0 0.0 25.6 23.8 19.3
Bowmont 5 0.5% 0.6 0.4 2.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.7
Caldwell 70 7.0% 7.6 6.3 6.3 7.0 7.6 4.3 9.8 0.0 29.2 0.0 7.6 7.8 4.9
Greenleaf 2 0.2% 0.4 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0
Melba 12 1.2% 1.8 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.0 5.0 0.0 1.0 1.9 0.7
Middleton 24 2.4% 2.7 2.0 2.9 1.0 2.4 0.0 6.7 0.0 10.0 0.0 2.9 2.4 1.4
Nampa 114 11.4% 9.0 13.9 5.9 11.7 9.4 12.3 19.0 0.0 47.5 0.0 11.5 10.7 9.8
Notus 3 0.3% 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.7
Parma 6 0.6% 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.3 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.1
Riverside 1 0.1% 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0
Wilder 3 0.3% 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0
Owyhee 19 1.9% 2.5 1.2 1.5 1.3 1.2 3.7 2.5 0.0 0.0 100.0 2.4 1.9 1.4
Bruneau 5 0.5% 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.3 0.2 1.0 0.4
Grand View 4 0.4% 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 21.1 0.7 0.5 0.0
Homedale 3 0.3% 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 15.8 0.5 0.0 0.4
Marsing 5 0.5% 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 26.3 1.0 0.5 0.0
Riddle 2 0.2% 0.4 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.7
DK/Refused 5 0.5% 0.0 1.0 1.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.1
PAGE 7
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 8-1
Q7. What is the most important issue facing Idaho today?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Education 226 22.6% 16.1 29.4 29.8 31.3 12.9 17.9 12.3 23.9 19.6 15.8 16.6 20.9 30.9
Jobs & Economy 201 20.1% 21.6 18.6 12.2 19.0 27.1 25.3 19.6 20.1 21.7 5.3 26.6 19.4 13.7
The Government in general 56 5.6% 7.5 3.7 5.4 4.3 4.7 4.9 9.8 5.2 6.7 10.5 3.7 4.4 8.8
Health Care 55 5.5% 5.1 5.9 3.9 5.3 7.6 4.3 6.7 5.8 4.2 5.3 4.4 3.9 8.8
Immigration 40 4.0% 3.5 4.5 3.4 2.3 5.3 4.9 5.5 4.3 3.3 0.0 5.4 4.4 1.8
Growth/Overpopulation 33 3.3% 3.9 2.7 1.5 2.7 5.3 3.1 4.9 3.0 3.8 0.0 4.1 4.4 1.4
Climate change/The 31 3.1% 3.1 3.1 5.9 3.7 2.4 1.2 1.2 3.0 3.3 5.3 3.9 3.9 1.8
Environment/water
Moral Issues 26 2.6% 2.5 2.7 2.9 2.7 1.2 4.9 1.2 2.3 2.5 15.8 2.9 2.4 2.8
Taxes/Budget & Funding 25 2.5% 3.3 1.6 2.0 2.3 4.1 2.5 1.8 3.0 1.3 0.0 3.4 1.0 2.8
Low Wages 24 2.4% 2.2 2.7 2.0 2.7 3.5 1.9 1.8 2.3 2.9 0.0 1.7 0.0 4.2
Gun Laws/2nd Amendment 24 2.4% 3.3 1.4 3.4 2.7 1.8 3.7 0.0 2.2 2.9 5.3 2.7 1.5 1.8
Presidential Election 22 2.2% 2.0 2.4 1.0 1.0 1.8 0.6 8.0 1.6 3.8 5.3 1.7 3.4 2.1
Land 19 1.9% 2.0 1.8 2.4 1.0 1.8 3.1 1.8 1.9 0.8 5.3 1.7 1.5 3.2
Roads/Infrastructure 18 1.8% 2.5 1.0 1.5 0.7 3.5 2.5 1.8 1.6 2.5 0.0 2.7 1.5 0.7
Terrorism/National Security 14 1.4% 2.5 0.2 0.5 1.3 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.4 1.3 5.3 1.5 1.9 0.7
Affordable Housing/ 8 0.8% 1.6 0.0 1.0 1.3 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.5 1.7 0.0 1.0 0.5 1.1
Affordable Living
Water 6 0.6% 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.6 1.8 0.5 0.8 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.7
Other 22 2.2% 2.9 1.4 2.0 2.3 1.8 3.7 1.2 1.6 4.2 0.0 1.2 4.4 1.8
Don't Know/Refused 150 15.0% 13.5 16.5 19.5 13.3 11.8 13.0 17.8 15.6 12.9 21.1 14.6 20.4 11.2
PAGE 8
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 9-1
Q8. Generally speaking, how would rate the quality of life in the Treasure Valley Region?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Excellent/Good 921 92.1% 92.0 92.2 90.7 92.3 90.6 96.3 90.8 94.2 85.4 94.7 94.9 91.3 91.6
Excellent 493 49.3% 48.2 50.4 43.4 50.3 54.7 48.8 49.7 52.9 38.8 42.1 57.3 45.6 43.2
Good 428 42.8% 43.7 41.8 47.3 42.0 35.9 47.5 41.1 41.3 46.7 52.6 37.6 45.6 48.4
Fair/Poor 74 7.4% 7.6 7.1 9.3 7.7 8.2 3.1 8.0 5.4 13.8 5.3 5.1 8.7 7.7
Fair 62 6.2% 6.7 5.7 6.8 6.0 8.2 1.9 8.0 4.3 12.5 0.0 4.4 8.3 5.6
Poor 12 1.2% 1.0 1.4 2.4 1.7 0.0 1.2 0.0 1.1 1.3 5.3 0.7 0.5 2.1
DK/Refused 5 0.5% 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.6 1.2 0.4 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7
Mean 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.6 1.7
NET DIF 1 847 84.7% 84.3 85.1 81.5 84.7 82.4 93.2 82.8 88.7 71.7 89.5 89.8 82.5 83.9
PAGE 9
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 10-1
Q9. And thinking specifically about your own neighborhood, how would rate the quality of life?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Excellent/Good 913 91.3% 91.2 91.4 87.8 92.3 92.4 93.8 90.2 93.2 86.3 89.5 93.9 88.3 90.9
Excellent 525 52.5% 51.8 53.3 39.5 55.7 57.1 56.2 54.6 56.7 40.8 42.1 56.6 49.5 51.2
Good 388 38.8% 39.4 38.2 48.3 36.7 35.3 37.7 35.6 36.5 45.4 47.4 37.3 38.8 39.6
Fair/Poor 84 8.4% 8.2 8.6 12.2 7.3 7.6 4.9 9.8 6.4 13.8 10.5 5.6 11.7 8.8
Fair 63 6.3% 6.7 5.9 6.8 6.0 6.5 3.7 8.6 5.0 10.0 0.0 4.4 7.8 6.7
Poor 21 2.1% 1.6 2.7 5.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.4 3.8 10.5 1.2 3.9 2.1
DK/Refused 3 0.3% 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.4
Mean 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.7 1.6
NET DIF 1 829 82.9% 82.9 82.9 75.6 85.0 84.7 88.9 80.4 86.8 72.5 78.9 88.3 76.7 82.1
PAGE 10
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 11-1
Q10. Would you say that the Treasure Valley is growing too fast, too slow or about right?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent too fast minus percent too slow)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Too fast 445 44.5% 42.0 47.1 30.7 41.0 50.0 53.1 54.0 42.9 46.3 73.7 45.9 45.1 41.1
Too slow 28 2.8% 2.2 3.5 2.9 3.0 1.8 3.1 3.1 2.4 3.8 5.3 1.7 3.4 2.8
About right 503 50.3% 54.9 45.5 63.9 54.0 48.2 42.0 36.8 52.4 46.7 21.1 50.0 49.5 53.3
DK/Refused 24 2.4% 1.0 3.9 2.4 2.0 0.0 1.9 6.1 2.2 3.3 0.0 2.4 1.9 2.8
NET DIF 1 417 41.7% 39.8 43.7 27.8 38.0 48.2 50.0 50.9 40.5 42.5 68.4 44.1 41.7 38.2
PAGE 11
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 12-1
Q11. Which of the following is the best reason to live in the Treasure Valley?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Crime and safety 317 31.7% 30.6 32.9 36.1 34.3 35.9 32.1 16.6 34.9 23.3 21.1 34.4 28.2 33.7
The cost of living 297 29.7% 27.6 31.8 25.9 33.0 26.5 32.7 28.8 27.6 35.4 31.6 26.6 35.9 31.2
Good jobs and a strong 137 13.7% 16.3 11.0 13.7 12.7 12.9 10.5 19.6 14.7 10.8 5.3 15.9 10.2 11.6
economy
The quality of education 57 5.7% 5.3 6.1 5.4 6.3 7.6 3.7 4.9 5.2 7.9 0.0 6.8 4.9 4.6
Lack of traffic and 54 5.4% 5.7 5.1 4.9 5.3 4.7 5.6 6.7 4.9 6.7 10.5 4.1 4.4 7.0
congestion
Low taxes 32 3.2% 3.9 2.4 3.9 2.7 2.4 1.2 6.1 3.3 2.9 5.3 3.2 5.3 2.5
DK/Refused 106 10.6% 10.6 10.6 10.2 5.7 10.0 14.2 17.2 9.5 12.9 26.3 9.0 11.2 9.5
PAGE 12
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 13-1
Q12A. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: The Treasure Valley is a good place to work and build a career.
(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 504 504 264 240 100 138 85 84 97 367 130 5 216 103 138
Agree 413 81.9% 82.2 81.7 84.0 86.2 81.2 79.8 76.3 82.8 79.2 80.0 88.9 78.6 75.4
Strongly Agree 244 48.4% 50.4 46.3 38.0 51.4 51.8 44.0 55.7 48.8 48.5 20.0 56.9 44.7 42.8
Somewhat Agree 169 33.5% 31.8 35.4 46.0 34.8 29.4 35.7 20.6 34.1 30.8 60.0 31.9 34.0 32.6
Disagree 64 12.7% 13.3 12.1 11.0 10.9 16.5 15.5 11.3 11.7 15.4 20.0 6.5 18.4 21.7
Somewhat Disagree 34 6.7% 7.6 5.8 5.0 6.5 8.2 8.3 6.2 6.3 8.5 0.0 3.7 8.7 11.6
Strongly Disagree 30 6.0% 5.7 6.3 6.0 4.3 8.2 7.1 5.2 5.4 6.9 20.0 2.8 9.7 10.1
DK/Refused 27 5.4% 4.5 6.3 5.0 2.9 2.4 4.8 12.4 5.4 5.4 0.0 4.6 2.9 2.9
Mean 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.7 2.2 1.5 1.8 1.9
NET DIF 1 349 69.2% 68.9 69.6 73.0 75.4 64.7 64.3 64.9 71.1 63.8 60.0 82.4 60.2 53.6
PAGE 13
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 14-1
Q12B. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: The Treasure Valley is a good place to raise a family.
(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 496 496 246 250 105 162 85 78 66 369 110 14 194 103 147
Agree 474 95.6% 94.7 96.4 96.2 98.1 95.3 92.3 92.4 96.5 93.6 85.7 96.4 94.2 97.3
Strongly Agree 365 73.6% 74.0 73.2 71.4 72.8 81.2 78.2 63.6 76.7 63.6 71.4 77.8 72.8 71.4
Somewhat Agree 109 22.0% 20.7 23.2 24.8 25.3 14.1 14.1 28.8 19.8 30.0 14.3 18.6 21.4 25.9
Disagree 15 3.0% 4.5 1.6 3.8 0.6 3.5 5.1 4.5 2.7 3.6 7.1 2.1 5.8 2.0
Somewhat Disagree 7 1.4% 2.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 3.5 2.6 3.0 1.6 0.9 0.0 0.5 1.9 1.4
Strongly Disagree 8 1.6% 2.4 0.8 3.8 0.6 0.0 2.6 1.5 1.1 2.7 7.1 1.5 3.9 0.7
DK/Refused 7 1.4% 0.8 2.0 0.0 1.2 1.2 2.6 3.0 0.8 2.7 7.1 1.5 0.0 0.7
Mean 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.3
NET DIF 1 459 92.5% 90.2 94.8 92.4 97.5 91.8 87.2 87.9 93.8 90.0 78.6 94.3 88.3 95.2
PAGE 14
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 15-1
Q13. In general, how would you rate the national economy in the United States today?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Excellent/Good 287 28.7% 28.2 29.2 31.2 30.7 25.3 29.0 25.2 30.0 22.5 36.8 18.8 29.1 46.3
Excellent 53 5.3% 4.7 5.9 11.7 6.0 1.8 2.5 2.5 5.7 4.2 0.0 2.9 5.8 9.5
Good 234 23.4% 23.5 23.3 19.5 24.7 23.5 26.5 22.7 24.3 18.3 36.8 15.9 23.3 36.8
Fair/Poor 699 69.9% 70.4 69.4 65.4 68.7 74.1 71.0 72.4 68.3 76.7 63.2 80.0 69.4 52.6
Fair 383 38.3% 37.3 39.4 33.2 43.7 44.1 37.0 30.1 38.7 39.2 21.1 41.0 35.9 36.1
Poor 316 31.6% 33.1 30.0 32.2 25.0 30.0 34.0 42.3 29.6 37.5 42.1 39.0 33.5 16.5
DK/Refused 14 1.4% 1.4 1.4 3.4 0.7 0.6 0.0 2.5 1.6 0.8 0.0 1.2 1.5 1.1
Mean 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.2 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.0 2.6
NET DIF 1 -412 -41.2% -42.2 -40.2 -34.1 -38.0 -48.8 -42.0 -47.2 -38.3 -54.2 -26.3 -61.2 -40.3 -6.3
PAGE 15
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 16-1
Q14. And how would you rate the economy here in the Treasure Valley?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Excellent/Good 648 64.8% 65.5 64.1 68.3 66.3 61.2 60.5 65.6 67.4 59.2 31.6 66.8 66.5 64.6
Excellent 135 13.5% 12.7 14.3 20.0 19.7 7.1 6.8 7.4 14.5 10.8 5.3 13.2 15.5 14.7
Good 513 51.3% 52.7 49.8 48.3 46.7 54.1 53.7 58.3 52.9 48.3 26.3 53.7 51.0 49.8
Fair/Poor 339 33.9% 33.1 34.7 29.3 33.0 37.6 38.9 32.5 31.4 40.0 57.9 32.0 33.0 33.7
Fair 269 26.9% 25.7 28.2 23.9 23.7 29.4 32.1 28.8 24.6 32.5 47.4 25.1 25.2 26.3
Poor 70 7.0% 7.5 6.5 5.4 9.3 8.2 6.8 3.7 6.8 7.5 10.5 6.8 7.8 7.4
DK/Refused 13 1.3% 1.4 1.2 2.4 0.7 1.2 0.6 1.8 1.2 0.8 10.5 1.2 0.5 1.8
Mean 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.3
NET DIF 1 309 30.9% 32.4 29.4 39.0 33.3 23.5 21.6 33.1 36.0 19.2 -26.3 34.9 33.5 30.9
PAGE 16
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 17-1
Q15. Which of the following sectors is most important to the Treasure Valley economy?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Agriculture 243 24.3% 24.9 23.7 28.3 19.0 18.8 29.6 29.4 18.6 40.0 52.6 24.6 24.8 20.7
Small business 180 18.0% 21.0 14.9 19.0 19.0 22.4 16.0 12.3 19.2 15.0 5.3 20.7 17.0 15.8
High tech 172 17.2% 19.8 14.5 15.1 19.7 24.1 13.6 11.7 20.5 8.8 0.0 17.6 15.5 20.4
Education 103 10.3% 6.3 14.5 10.2 10.7 4.7 11.1 14.7 10.3 10.4 0.0 8.3 11.2 13.3
Healthcare 97 9.7% 8.8 10.6 6.3 11.3 6.5 11.1 12.9 10.6 6.7 10.5 10.7 9.7 8.1
Construction 90 9.0% 8.2 9.8 6.3 10.7 8.8 9.3 9.2 8.7 9.2 21.1 10.2 9.2 8.4
The service industry 26 2.6% 2.7 2.4 2.9 3.3 3.5 0.0 2.5 3.1 1.3 0.0 1.7 2.9 3.9
Banking and finance 11 1.1% 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.3 2.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.8 0.0 0.2 1.5 1.8
DK/Refused 78 7.8% 7.1 8.6 10.7 6.0 8.8 8.0 6.1 7.7 7.9 10.5 5.9 8.3 7.7
PAGE 17
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 18-1
Q16. Over the next year do you think you or your family's personal financial situation will get better, worse or stay about the same?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent better minus percent worse)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Better 312 31.2% 32.2 30.2 46.3 43.3 26.5 15.4 10.4 33.7 23.8 26.3 31.7 32.5 31.6
Worse 91 9.1% 9.2 9.0 5.4 6.7 12.4 14.8 9.2 8.3 10.4 26.3 10.0 9.2 8.1
Stay the same 583 58.3% 57.5 59.2 47.3 49.3 58.8 69.8 76.7 56.5 64.6 47.4 57.1 57.3 59.3
DK/Refused 14 1.4% 1.2 1.6 1.0 0.7 2.4 0.0 3.7 1.5 1.3 0.0 1.2 1.0 1.1
NET DIF 1 221 22.1% 22.9 21.2 41.0 36.7 14.1 0.6 1.2 25.4 13.3 0.0 21.7 23.3 23.5
PAGE 18
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 19-1
Q17. Over the next year do you think unemployment rate in the Treasure Valley will go up, down or stay the same?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent up minus percent down)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Up 196 19.6% 20.6 18.6 17.1 14.0 19.4 22.8 30.1 17.9 24.6 21.1 20.5 20.4 15.4
Down 208 20.8% 22.7 18.8 30.2 23.7 18.2 11.1 16.0 21.1 19.2 26.3 23.2 20.9 18.9
Stay the same 544 54.4% 52.2 56.7 51.7 57.3 57.6 59.3 44.2 56.4 49.6 42.1 51.2 53.4 61.4
DK/Refused 52 5.2% 4.5 5.9 1.0 5.0 4.7 6.8 9.8 4.6 6.7 10.5 5.1 5.3 4.2
NET DIF 1 -12 -1.2% -2.2 -0.2 -13.2 -9.7 1.2 11.7 14.1 -3.1 5.4 -5.3 -2.7 -0.5 -3.5
PAGE 19
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 20-1
Q18. Over the next year do you think housing costs in the Treasure Valley will go up, down or stay the same?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent up minus percent down)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Up 759 75.9% 78.4 73.3 71.2 79.0 75.3 78.4 74.2 75.5 76.3 78.9 73.7 74.8 78.6
Down 50 5.0% 5.5 4.5 7.3 3.0 6.5 4.9 4.3 5.2 4.6 5.3 6.6 6.8 2.8
Stay the same 155 15.5% 11.8 19.4 16.6 16.0 14.7 13.0 16.6 16.0 14.6 10.5 17.1 12.6 15.8
DK/Refused 36 3.6% 4.3 2.9 4.9 2.0 3.5 3.7 4.9 3.3 4.6 5.3 2.7 5.8 2.8
NET DIF 1 709 70.9% 72.9 68.8 63.9 76.0 68.8 73.5 69.9 70.4 71.7 73.7 67.1 68.0 75.8
PAGE 20
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 21-1
Q19. Over the next year do you think healthcare costs in the Treasure Valley will go up, down or stay the same?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent up minus percent down)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Up 745 74.5% 75.3 73.7 57.1 75.7 79.4 87.0 76.7 74.9 72.9 73.7 78.5 67.5 73.7
Down 24 2.4% 2.2 2.7 4.9 1.7 2.9 0.6 1.8 2.6 2.1 0.0 2.0 4.9 2.1
Stay the same 190 19.0% 18.2 19.8 29.8 18.3 15.9 11.1 17.8 18.8 20.8 10.5 16.1 21.8 21.1
DK/Refused 41 4.1% 4.3 3.9 8.3 4.3 1.8 1.2 3.7 3.8 4.2 15.8 3.4 5.8 3.2
NET DIF 1 721 72.1% 73.1 71.0 52.2 74.0 76.5 86.4 74.8 72.3 70.8 73.7 76.6 62.6 71.6
PAGE 21
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 22-1
Q20. Over the next year do you think gas costs in the Treasure Valley will go up, down or stay the same?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent up minus percent down)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Up 567 56.7% 55.7 57.8 51.2 57.7 64.1 58.6 52.1 57.2 54.6 63.2 55.4 56.8 56.5
Down 36 3.6% 3.7 3.5 6.8 2.7 3.5 3.1 1.8 3.9 2.9 0.0 5.9 4.4 0.7
Stay the same 335 33.5% 35.7 31.2 38.0 34.7 28.2 28.4 36.2 32.9 35.4 31.6 31.7 33.0 38.6
DK/Refused 62 6.2% 4.9 7.6 3.9 5.0 4.1 9.9 9.8 6.0 7.1 5.3 7.1 5.8 4.2
NET DIF 1 531 53.1% 52.0 54.3 44.4 55.0 60.6 55.6 50.3 53.3 51.7 63.2 49.5 52.4 55.8
PAGE 22
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 23-1
Q21. Compared to nearby communities, would you say your taxes are higher, lower or about the same?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent higher minus percent lower)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Higher 265 26.5% 27.3 25.7 22.9 22.7 34.1 31.5 25.2 29.1 19.6 10.5 25.1 27.7 29.8
Lower 151 15.1% 16.3 13.9 18.0 17.0 11.8 15.4 11.0 11.3 23.3 52.6 16.8 14.6 13.3
About the same 498 49.8% 49.8 49.8 49.8 53.0 46.5 45.1 52.1 51.6 46.7 26.3 53.2 49.5 45.3
DK/Refused 86 8.6% 6.7 10.6 9.3 7.3 7.6 8.0 11.7 8.0 10.4 10.5 4.9 8.3 11.6
NET DIF 1 114 11.4% 11.0 11.8 4.9 5.7 22.4 16.0 14.1 17.8 -3.8 -42.1 8.3 13.1 16.5
PAGE 23
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 24-1
Q22. Which level of government do you most often look to for services?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Federal 113 11.3% 12.2 10.4 14.6 4.0 14.7 14.2 14.1 11.5 10.8 10.5 7.8 12.6 15.1
State 212 21.2% 18.4 24.1 22.0 22.3 23.5 18.5 18.4 21.9 19.6 21.1 19.0 16.5 27.7
County 204 20.4% 22.4 18.4 22.0 21.3 17.1 22.2 18.4 18.8 24.6 21.1 23.4 21.8 15.1
City 331 33.1% 33.7 32.4 31.7 36.0 32.4 29.6 33.7 34.5 28.3 36.8 33.7 36.4 31.2
DK/Refused 140 14.0% 13.3 14.7 9.8 16.3 12.4 15.4 15.3 13.3 16.7 10.5 16.1 12.6 10.9
PAGE 24
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 25-1
Q23. And from the same list, which level of government do you think should be providing you the most services?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Federal 138 13.8% 13.5 14.1 20.0 10.0 15.9 8.6 16.0 13.6 14.6 15.8 9.5 15.5 16.5
State 356 35.6% 31.0 40.4 38.0 37.0 34.1 34.0 33.1 36.5 33.3 26.3 38.8 27.7 40.4
County 139 13.9% 15.1 12.7 8.8 14.3 13.5 19.1 14.7 12.9 16.3 21.1 13.9 20.4 10.5
City 279 27.9% 32.0 23.7 26.3 34.0 22.9 29.0 22.7 28.4 25.8 31.6 29.3 30.1 23.2
DK/Refused 88 8.8% 8.4 9.2 6.8 4.7 13.5 9.3 13.5 8.6 10.0 5.3 8.5 6.3 9.5
PAGE 25
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 26-1
Q24. Considering what you pay in taxes, would you say the government services you receive are excellent, good, fair or poor?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Excellent/Good 482 48.2% 45.7 50.8 50.7 50.3 41.8 50.6 45.4 50.1 42.5 36.8 45.1 46.6 58.6
Excellent 102 10.2% 10.8 9.6 20.5 11.0 4.1 4.9 7.4 11.7 6.3 0.0 7.6 11.7 14.0
Good 380 38.0% 34.9 41.2 30.2 39.3 37.6 45.7 38.0 38.5 36.3 36.8 37.6 35.0 44.6
Fair/Poor 492 49.2% 52.7 45.5 47.3 48.0 55.3 46.3 50.3 47.1 55.0 63.2 52.7 51.0 39.3
Fair 293 29.3% 30.2 28.4 20.5 28.3 35.3 29.6 35.6 29.2 29.2 36.8 32.0 28.2 24.9
Poor 199 19.9% 22.5 17.1 26.8 19.7 20.0 16.7 14.7 17.9 25.8 26.3 20.7 22.8 14.4
DK/Refused 26 2.6% 1.6 3.7 2.0 1.7 2.9 3.1 4.3 2.7 2.5 0.0 2.2 2.4 2.1
Mean 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.4
NET DIF 1 -10 -1.0% -7.1 5.3 3.4 2.3 -13.5 4.3 -4.9 3.0 -12.5 -26.3 -7.6 -4.4 19.3
PAGE 26
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 27-1
Q25. Currently, only a few Idaho resort cities have a local sales tax in addition to the state sales tax. These local sales taxes are sometimes also referred to as local
"option" taxes because the taxes are decided by the voters in the community affected. These funds go to support infrastructure and other projects in the community. Would
you favor or oppose giving every city in Idaho the ability to vote on a local option tax?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent favor minus percent oppose)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Favor 620 62.0% 63.9 60.0 72.7 62.7 58.8 59.9 52.8 64.4 55.0 52.6 57.3 61.7 71.9
Strongly Favor 332 33.2% 34.1 32.2 33.7 35.7 32.9 35.2 26.4 34.9 28.3 26.3 28.0 35.4 41.8
Somewhat Favor 288 28.8% 29.8 27.8 39.0 27.0 25.9 24.7 26.4 29.5 26.7 26.3 29.3 26.2 30.2
Oppose 322 32.2% 31.6 32.9 22.4 33.3 35.9 35.8 35.0 29.9 38.8 42.1 37.3 33.5 23.2
Somewhat Oppose 123 12.3% 10.6 14.1 13.7 13.3 11.8 11.1 10.4 11.8 13.8 15.8 14.9 12.6 9.1
Strongly Oppose 199 19.9% 21.0 18.8 8.8 20.0 24.1 24.7 24.5 18.1 25.0 26.3 22.4 20.9 14.0
DK/Refused 58 5.8% 4.5 7.1 4.9 4.0 5.3 4.3 12.3 5.7 6.3 5.3 5.4 4.9 4.9
Mean 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.0
NET DIF 1 298 29.8% 32.4 27.1 50.2 29.3 22.9 24.1 17.8 34.5 16.3 10.5 20.0 28.2 48.8
PAGE 27
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 28-1
Q26. And if your town or city were to propose a local option tax, would you favor or oppose that plan?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent favor minus percent oppose)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Favor 418 41.8% 43.1 40.4 55.1 41.3 37.1 39.5 33.1 44.0 35.4 36.8 33.2 40.8 58.9
Strongly Favor 204 20.4% 21.0 19.8 29.3 21.0 17.1 17.3 14.7 22.0 15.0 26.3 13.4 19.9 33.7
Somewhat Favor 214 21.4% 22.2 20.6 25.9 20.3 20.0 22.2 18.4 22.0 20.4 10.5 19.8 20.9 25.3
Oppose 478 47.8% 45.5 50.2 38.5 50.0 49.4 51.9 49.7 45.2 55.0 52.6 57.3 48.1 31.6
Somewhat Oppose 169 16.9% 15.7 18.2 20.5 19.7 13.5 16.0 11.7 15.9 18.8 26.3 21.0 15.0 13.7
Strongly Oppose 309 30.9% 29.8 32.0 18.0 30.3 35.9 35.8 38.0 29.3 36.3 26.3 36.3 33.0 17.9
DK/Refused 104 10.4% 11.4 9.4 6.3 8.7 13.5 8.6 17.2 10.7 9.6 10.5 9.5 11.2 9.5
Mean 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.3 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.8 2.6 2.9 2.7 2.2
NET DIF 1 -60 -6.0% -2.4 -9.8 16.6 -8.7 -12.4 -12.3 -16.6 -1.2 -19.6 -15.8 -24.1 -7.3 27.4
PAGE 28
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 29-1
Q27. Generally speaking, how would you rate the quality of education in Idaho's K-12 public schools?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Excellent/Good 392 39.2% 36.9 41.6 31.7 41.0 34.1 44.4 45.4 41.2 35.4 21.1 44.1 40.3 33.3
Excellent 83 8.3% 8.8 7.8 13.7 10.3 7.1 3.1 4.3 8.8 7.1 5.3 8.8 8.3 7.4
Good 309 30.9% 28.0 33.9 18.0 30.7 27.1 41.4 41.1 32.3 28.3 15.8 35.4 32.0 26.0
Fair/Poor 548 54.8% 57.5 52.0 62.4 54.3 60.6 50.0 44.8 53.0 57.5 78.9 50.0 53.4 62.5
Fair 319 31.9% 32.5 31.2 28.8 35.7 35.3 30.9 26.4 30.6 32.9 63.2 32.7 29.1 35.1
Poor 229 22.9% 24.9 20.8 33.7 18.7 25.3 19.1 18.4 22.4 24.6 15.8 17.3 24.3 27.4
DK/Refused 60 6.0% 5.7 6.3 5.9 4.7 5.3 5.6 9.8 5.8 7.1 0.0 5.9 6.3 4.2
Mean 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.9
NET DIF 1 -156 -15.6% -20.6 -10.4 -30.7 -13.3 -26.5 -5.6 0.6 -11.8 -22.1 -57.9 -5.9 -13.1 -29.1
PAGE 29
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 30-1
Q28. And thinking specifically about your school district, how would you rate the quality of K-12 public schools in your area?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Excellent/Good 497 49.7% 45.7 53.9 42.0 54.7 51.2 48.1 50.3 53.8 40.0 26.3 51.5 46.1 52.3
Excellent 132 13.2% 11.8 14.7 12.2 19.3 15.3 6.2 8.0 14.7 10.0 0.0 12.4 14.6 14.7
Good 365 36.5% 33.9 39.2 29.8 35.3 35.9 42.0 42.3 39.1 30.0 26.3 39.0 31.6 37.5
Fair/Poor 412 41.2% 45.1 37.1 48.8 40.0 38.8 40.1 37.4 37.6 49.2 63.2 39.0 43.7 41.1
Fair 255 25.5% 25.9 25.1 28.3 25.0 21.8 26.5 25.8 23.2 30.8 36.8 26.8 25.7 24.6
Poor 157 15.7% 19.2 12.0 20.5 15.0 17.1 13.6 11.7 14.4 18.3 26.3 12.2 18.0 16.5
DK/Refused 91 9.1% 9.2 9.0 9.3 5.3 10.0 11.7 12.3 8.6 10.8 10.5 9.5 10.2 6.7
Mean 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.6 3.0 2.4 2.5 2.5
NET DIF 1 85 8.5% 0.6 16.7 -6.8 14.7 12.4 8.0 12.9 16.2 -9.2 -36.8 12.4 2.4 11.2
PAGE 30
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 31-1
Q29. If your school district were to receive additional funding, which of the following should be the highest priority of education funding?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Raise teacher salaries to 254 25.4% 25.9 24.9 29.3 23.7 25.9 28.4 20.2 24.6 28.3 10.5 21.0 29.6 29.5
retain existing teachers
Increase starting teacher 161 16.1% 17.5 14.7 15.6 20.3 14.1 13.0 14.1 17.5 12.1 15.8 15.9 14.6 18.6
salaries to attract new
teachers
Technology in the classroom 129 12.9% 14.3 11.4 10.7 13.0 15.9 11.7 13.5 12.4 14.6 15.8 13.7 18.0 8.4
New books and supplies for 99 9.9% 8.2 11.6 8.3 8.3 9.4 17.3 8.0 9.8 8.8 31.6 11.2 10.7 7.4
students
Extra-Curriculars such as 78 7.8% 6.7 9.0 10.7 7.7 8.8 6.2 4.9 8.7 5.4 5.3 8.3 6.8 8.1
athletics and music programs
Professional development for 59 5.9% 6.5 5.3 8.8 6.7 3.5 4.3 4.9 6.9 2.9 5.3 5.6 4.4 8.4
existing teachers
School Facilities and 57 5.7% 5.9 5.5 4.4 6.7 5.3 2.5 9.2 4.8 7.9 5.3 8.0 1.5 4.6
Maintenance
School Safety 26 2.6% 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.0 2.4 3.1 3.1 1.8 5.4 0.0 3.4 1.5 1.8
None 21 2.1% 2.9 1.2 1.5 0.7 3.5 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.1 5.3 2.4 2.9 0.7
All 82 8.2% 6.5 10.0 6.3 8.7 7.1 8.0 11.0 8.2 9.2 0.0 6.3 7.3 10.5
DK/Refused 34 3.4% 2.7 4.1 1.5 2.3 4.1 2.5 8.0 3.4 3.3 5.3 4.1 2.9 2.1
PAGE 31
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 32-1
Q30. And from the same list, which should be the second highest priority?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Raise teacher salaries to 167 16.7% 15.9 17.6 14.1 24.3 17.1 10.5 11.7 17.0 15.8 10.5 15.9 14.1 21.1
retain existing teachers
Increase starting teacher 148 14.8% 13.7 15.9 18.5 15.3 14.1 11.7 12.9 15.9 11.7 15.8 12.0 16.0 17.9
salaries to attract new
teachers
Technology in the classroom 140 14.0% 18.2 9.6 14.6 11.3 16.5 19.8 9.8 15.4 10.8 5.3 17.6 14.1 10.9
Extra-Curriculars such as 126 12.6% 11.2 14.1 10.7 11.7 13.5 14.8 13.5 11.3 15.8 21.1 13.9 8.7 13.3
athletics and music programs
New books and supplies for 107 10.7% 9.6 11.8 10.7 9.0 9.4 12.3 13.5 9.1 16.3 5.3 9.5 13.6 11.2
students
Professional development for 77 7.7% 8.6 6.7 9.3 9.3 5.3 7.4 5.5 8.4 4.6 10.5 8.3 8.3 6.0
existing teachers
School Facilities and 72 7.2% 7.8 6.5 4.9 7.3 8.2 9.9 6.1 6.8 8.3 10.5 8.0 6.3 7.0
Maintenance
School Safety 38 3.8% 3.5 4.1 6.8 1.7 4.7 3.1 3.7 4.3 2.1 5.3 3.4 4.9 3.5
None 23 2.3% 2.9 1.6 1.5 0.7 3.5 3.1 4.3 1.8 3.3 10.5 2.9 2.9 0.7
All 59 5.9% 5.7 6.1 6.3 6.0 5.3 4.3 7.4 5.7 7.1 0.0 4.6 8.3 4.6
DK/Refused 43 4.3% 2.7 5.9 2.4 3.3 2.4 3.1 11.7 4.3 4.2 5.3 3.9 2.9 3.9
PAGE 32
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 33-1
Q31A. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: My school district should raise additional tax revenue to increase education funding.
(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 504 504 264 240 100 138 85 84 97 367 130 5 216 103 138
Agree 247 49.0% 49.2 48.8 67.0 54.3 34.1 38.1 45.4 50.1 47.7 20.0 37.5 57.3 63.0
Strongly Agree 117 23.2% 23.1 23.3 36.0 24.6 15.3 19.0 18.6 24.5 20.8 0.0 14.8 28.2 34.8
Somewhat Agree 130 25.8% 26.1 25.4 31.0 29.7 18.8 19.0 26.8 25.6 26.9 20.0 22.7 29.1 28.3
Disagree 223 44.2% 44.7 43.8 31.0 40.6 56.5 56.0 42.3 41.7 49.2 80.0 56.9 36.9 32.6
Somewhat Disagree 94 18.7% 18.6 18.8 19.0 19.6 23.5 14.3 16.5 16.9 23.8 0.0 23.6 14.6 15.2
Strongly Disagree 129 25.6% 26.1 25.0 12.0 21.0 32.9 41.7 25.8 24.8 25.4 80.0 33.3 22.3 17.4
DK/Refused 34 6.7% 6.1 7.5 2.0 5.1 9.4 6.0 12.4 8.2 3.1 0.0 5.6 5.8 4.3
Mean 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.1 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.6 3.6 2.8 2.3 2.2
NET DIF 1 24 4.8% 4.5 5.0 36.0 13.8 -22.4 -17.9 3.1 8.4 -1.5 -60.0 -19.4 20.4 30.4
PAGE 33
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 34-1
Q31B. A recent study shows the state of Idaho ranks 49th out of the 50 states in per-pupil funding. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following
statement: My school district should raise additional tax revenue to increase education funding.
(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 496 496 246 250 105 162 85 78 66 369 110 14 194 103 147
Agree 256 51.6% 50.0 53.2 62.9 53.7 48.2 41.0 45.5 53.9 47.3 21.4 43.8 45.6 70.7
Strongly Agree 130 26.2% 26.8 25.6 27.6 29.6 24.7 25.6 18.2 27.6 23.6 7.1 22.2 25.2 35.4
Somewhat Agree 126 25.4% 23.2 27.6 35.2 24.1 23.5 15.4 27.3 26.3 23.6 14.3 21.6 20.4 35.4
Disagree 214 43.1% 46.3 40.0 34.3 40.7 47.1 56.4 42.4 40.9 46.4 78.6 52.6 52.4 23.1
Somewhat Disagree 97 19.6% 21.5 17.6 18.1 20.4 18.8 25.6 13.6 18.2 22.7 35.7 27.3 18.4 11.6
Strongly Disagree 117 23.6% 24.8 22.4 16.2 20.4 28.2 30.8 28.8 22.8 23.6 42.9 25.3 34.0 11.6
DK/Refused 26 5.2% 3.7 6.8 2.9 5.6 4.7 2.6 12.1 5.1 6.4 0.0 3.6 1.9 6.1
Mean 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.5 3.1 2.6 2.6 2.0
NET DIF 1 42 8.5% 3.7 13.2 28.6 13.0 1.2 -15.4 3.0 13.0 0.9 -57.1 -8.8 -6.8 47.6
PAGE 34
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 35-1
Q32. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: Access to high-quality, affordable preschool is beneficial to educational performance
later in life?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Agree 712 71.2% 71.0 71.4 82.0 72.0 68.8 62.3 67.5 74.0 64.2 42.1 62.2 71.8 87.0
Strongly Agree 509 50.9% 50.0 51.8 56.6 51.3 51.2 46.9 46.6 53.0 45.8 26.3 41.2 50.5 67.4
Somewhat Agree 203 20.3% 21.0 19.6 25.4 20.7 17.6 15.4 20.9 21.1 18.3 15.8 21.0 21.4 19.6
Disagree 231 23.1% 22.4 23.9 16.1 22.3 24.1 30.2 25.2 20.4 30.4 42.1 30.5 24.8 8.8
Somewhat Disagree 109 10.9% 10.4 11.4 8.8 13.3 9.4 11.7 9.8 9.4 15.0 21.1 15.4 9.2 4.2
Strongly Disagree 122 12.2% 12.0 12.4 7.3 9.0 14.7 18.5 15.3 11.0 15.4 21.1 15.1 15.5 4.6
DK/Refused 57 5.7% 6.7 4.7 2.0 5.7 7.1 7.4 7.4 5.6 5.4 15.8 7.3 3.4 4.2
Mean 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 2.0 1.9 1.4
NET DIF 1 481 48.1% 48.6 47.6 65.9 49.7 44.7 32.1 42.3 53.7 33.8 0.0 31.7 47.1 78.2
PAGE 35
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 36-1
Q33. Would you be willing to spend more in taxes to support access to high-quality, affordable preschool in your school district - yes or no?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent yes minus percent no)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Yes 519 51.9% 53.3 50.4 65.9 56.3 47.6 37.7 44.8 54.5 45.8 26.3 38.0 53.9 75.1
No 431 43.1% 42.9 43.3 31.7 38.7 47.1 56.8 47.9 40.8 48.8 73.7 56.8 42.2 20.7
DK/Refused 50 5.0% 3.7 6.3 2.4 5.0 5.3 5.6 7.4 4.8 5.4 0.0 5.1 3.9 4.2
NET DIF 1 88 8.8% 10.4 7.1 34.1 17.7 0.6 -19.1 -3.1 13.7 -2.9 -47.4 -18.8 11.7 54.4
PAGE 36
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 37-1
Q34. How do you typically commute to work?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Driving 595 59.5% 62.9 55.9 78.5 70.7 66.5 51.9 15.3 61.8 53.3 52.6 61.5 58.3 59.3
Biking 43 4.3% 5.1 3.5 7.8 5.7 1.8 3.1 1.2 4.9 1.7 5.3 3.2 5.3 6.7
Walking 19 1.9% 2.5 1.2 1.5 3.3 1.2 0.6 1.8 1.5 2.9 5.3 1.5 2.4 2.5
Public Transportation 7 0.7% 1.0 0.4 1.0 0.3 1.8 0.6 0.0 0.5 1.3 0.0 0.2 1.5 1.1
Don't work 240 24.0% 20.8 27.3 5.9 10.7 14.7 32.7 72.4 21.3 32.1 26.3 22.7 23.3 24.9
Work from home 82 8.2% 6.1 10.4 4.4 9.3 12.9 8.0 6.1 8.4 7.5 10.5 10.5 7.8 4.9
DK/Refused 14 1.4% 1.6 1.2 1.0 0.0 1.2 3.1 3.1 1.5 1.3 0.0 0.5 1.5 0.7
PAGE 37
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 38-1
Q35. In minutes, how long is your typical commute to work?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 664 664 365 299 182 240 121 91 30 506 142 12 272 139 198
Don't work 13 2.0% 1.4 2.7 1.1 0.8 2.5 1.1 16.7 1.4 4.2 0.0 2.6 0.0 2.0
1-20 minutes 424 63.9% 61.6 66.6 64.3 62.9 65.3 67.0 53.3 70.0 45.1 33.3 60.7 63.3 69.2
Less than 5 minutes 46 6.9% 7.7 6.0 8.8 5.4 6.6 5.5 13.3 7.1 6.3 8.3 6.3 5.8 9.1
6-10 minutes 115 17.3% 15.9 19.1 15.9 18.8 19.0 17.6 6.7 19.0 12.0 16.7 14.3 20.1 17.7
11-20 minutes 263 39.6% 38.1 41.5 39.6 38.8 39.7 44.0 33.3 43.9 26.8 8.3 40.1 37.4 42.4
21-60 minutes 202 30.4% 32.1 28.4 31.9 34.6 26.4 26.4 16.7 25.3 45.8 58.3 32.7 32.4 25.8
21-30 minutes 139 20.9% 23.0 18.4 20.9 23.3 19.8 19.8 10.0 17.6 31.7 41.7 20.6 23.7 19.7
31-45 minutes 50 7.5% 7.1 8.0 9.9 8.3 4.1 5.5 6.7 6.3 9.9 16.7 9.9 7.2 4.0
46-60 minutes 13 2.0% 1.9 2.0 1.1 2.9 2.5 1.1 0.0 1.4 4.2 0.0 2.2 1.4 2.0
Over one hour 15 2.3% 3.6 0.7 2.2 0.4 3.3 4.4 6.7 1.8 4.2 0.0 2.6 2.9 1.5
DK/Refused 10 1.5% 1.4 1.7 0.5 1.3 2.5 1.1 6.7 1.6 0.7 8.3 1.5 1.4 1.5
PAGE 38
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 39-1
Q36. Which of the following statements comes closest to your own opinion?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent enough minus percent more)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
There are enough mass 278 27.8% 32.7 22.7 24.9 26.3 23.5 32.7 33.7 27.6 27.5 47.4 35.1 29.6 17.9
transportation options in
the Treasure Valley
The Treasure Valley could 668 66.8% 61.6 72.2 69.3 71.7 71.2 62.3 54.6 67.8 65.0 42.1 60.0 64.1 78.9
use more mass transportation
options
DK/Refused 54 5.4% 5.7 5.1 5.9 2.0 5.3 4.9 11.7 4.6 7.5 10.5 4.9 6.3 3.2
NET DIF 1 -390 -39.0% -28.8 -49.6 -44.4 -45.3 -47.6 -29.6 -20.9 -40.2 -37.5 5.3 -24.9 -34.5 -61.1
PAGE 39
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 40-1
Q37. If the Treasure Valley were going to build more mass transit, which of the following funding sources would you prefer?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent tax minus percent none)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Tax 751 75.1% 74.1 76.1 86.3 79.3 72.4 70.4 60.7 76.0 70.8 89.5 70.5 73.8 86.3
Sales Tax 232 23.2% 22.5 23.9 24.9 28.3 22.9 19.8 15.3 21.1 27.5 47.4 21.7 31.1 20.7
Gas Tax 293 29.3% 27.3 31.4 25.4 30.7 28.2 30.9 31.3 31.8 22.5 21.1 30.5 23.3 32.6
Property Tax 101 10.1% 9.8 10.4 16.6 8.7 12.4 8.6 3.7 11.8 5.4 5.3 7.3 8.7 16.8
Income Tax 125 12.5% 14.5 10.4 19.5 11.7 8.8 11.1 10.4 11.3 15.4 15.8 11.0 10.7 16.1
No Taxes/Don't Want to Build 182 18.2% 20.0 16.3 8.3 16.3 20.0 22.2 28.2 17.4 22.1 5.3 24.1 18.0 8.4
DK/Refused 67 6.7% 5.9 7.6 5.4 4.3 7.6 7.4 11.0 6.7 7.1 5.3 5.4 8.3 5.3
NET DIF 1 569 56.9% 54.1 59.8 78.0 63.0 52.4 48.1 32.5 58.6 48.8 84.2 46.3 55.8 77.9
PAGE 40
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 41-1
Q38A. Would you say that you favor or oppose building a new commuter rail service on existing rail line to link major residential, entertainment and employment centers
throughout the Treasure Valley?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent favor minus percent oppose)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 504 504 264 240 100 138 85 84 97 367 130 5 216 103 138
Favor 327 64.9% 63.6 66.3 74.0 66.7 64.7 63.1 54.6 67.6 59.2 0.0 59.3 70.9 76.8
Strongly Favor 189 37.5% 34.1 41.3 41.0 37.7 41.2 39.3 28.9 39.0 34.6 0.0 31.5 42.7 47.1
Somewhat Favor 138 27.4% 29.5 25.0 33.0 29.0 23.5 23.8 25.8 28.6 24.6 0.0 27.8 28.2 29.7
Oppose 140 27.8% 31.8 23.3 17.0 26.8 28.2 33.3 35.1 26.7 30.0 60.0 34.3 26.2 15.9
Somewhat Oppose 57 11.3% 11.4 11.3 11.0 13.8 8.2 10.7 11.3 10.1 14.6 20.0 12.5 13.6 8.0
Strongly Oppose 83 16.5% 20.5 12.1 6.0 13.0 20.0 22.6 23.7 16.6 15.4 40.0 21.8 12.6 8.0
DK/Refused 37 7.3% 4.5 10.4 9.0 6.5 7.1 3.6 10.3 5.7 10.8 40.0 6.5 2.9 7.2
Mean 2.1 2.1 2.2 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.0 2.1 3.7 2.3 2.0 1.8
NET DIF 1 187 37.1% 31.8 42.9 57.0 39.9 36.5 29.8 19.6 40.9 29.2 -60.0 25.0 44.7 60.9
PAGE 41
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 42-1
Q38B. If there were a funding mechanism such as a local option sales tax that could pay for some of the associated costs with building a new commuter rail service on
existing rail line to link major residential, entertainment and employment centers throughout the Treasure Valley, would you favor or oppose that plan?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent favor minus percent oppose)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 496 496 246 250 105 162 85 78 66 369 110 14 194 103 147
Favor 282 56.9% 54.1 59.6 63.8 59.3 58.8 51.3 43.9 59.6 47.3 57.1 41.2 57.3 76.2
Strongly Favor 169 34.1% 32.5 35.6 41.0 34.6 32.9 30.8 27.3 35.8 27.3 42.9 24.2 37.9 46.3
Somewhat Favor 113 22.8% 21.5 24.0 22.9 24.7 25.9 20.5 16.7 23.8 20.0 14.3 17.0 19.4 29.9
Oppose 184 37.1% 40.2 34.0 30.5 30.9 40.0 47.4 47.0 34.7 44.5 42.9 50.0 37.9 20.4
Somewhat Oppose 74 14.9% 15.0 14.8 16.2 15.4 9.4 19.2 13.6 13.8 16.4 35.7 19.6 12.6 10.2
Strongly Oppose 110 22.2% 25.2 19.2 14.3 15.4 30.6 28.2 33.3 20.9 28.2 7.1 30.4 25.2 10.2
DK/Refused 30 6.0% 5.7 6.4 5.7 9.9 1.2 1.3 9.1 5.7 8.2 0.0 8.8 4.9 3.4
Mean 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.2 2.5 2.1 2.6 2.3 1.8
NET DIF 1 98 19.8% 13.8 25.6 33.3 28.4 18.8 3.8 -3.0 24.9 2.7 14.3 -8.8 19.4 55.8
PAGE 42
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 43-1
Q39A. Some local governments have recently allocated increased funding to address the lack of affordable housing in the Treasure Valley. Would you say you favor or oppose
spending government money to build low-income housing facilities?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent favor minus percent oppose)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 504 504 264 240 100 138 85 84 97 367 130 5 216 103 138
Favor 280 55.6% 51.1 60.4 62.0 54.3 55.3 53.6 52.6 57.8 49.2 40.0 35.6 60.2 83.3
Strongly Favor 151 30.0% 26.1 34.2 35.0 26.1 29.4 34.5 26.8 31.9 23.8 40.0 18.1 30.1 46.4
Somewhat Favor 129 25.6% 25.0 26.3 27.0 28.3 25.9 19.0 25.8 25.9 25.4 0.0 17.6 30.1 37.0
Oppose 195 38.7% 43.2 33.8 34.0 39.9 40.0 39.3 40.2 36.2 46.2 40.0 59.3 37.9 9.4
Somewhat Oppose 85 16.9% 15.5 18.3 24.0 13.0 17.6 17.9 13.4 16.9 16.9 20.0 22.2 23.3 5.8
Strongly Oppose 110 21.8% 27.7 15.4 10.0 26.8 22.4 21.4 26.8 19.3 29.2 20.0 37.0 14.6 3.6
DK/Refused 29 5.8% 5.7 5.8 4.0 5.8 4.7 7.1 7.2 6.0 4.6 20.0 5.1 1.9 7.2
Mean 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.3 2.8 2.2 1.6
NET DIF 1 85 16.9% 8.0 26.7 28.0 14.5 15.3 14.3 12.4 21.5 3.1 0.0 -23.6 22.3 73.9
PAGE 43
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 44-1
Q39B. It is estimated that over 30% of Boise residents qualify for affordable housing, yet over 10,000 additional affordable housing units throughout the Treasure Valley
are needed to house them. Some local governments have recently allocated increased funding to address the lack of affordable housing in the Treasure Valley. Would you
say you favor or oppose spending government money to build low-income housing facilities?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent favor minus percent oppose)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 496 496 246 250 105 162 85 78 66 369 110 14 194 103 147
Favor 294 59.3% 56.5 62.0 76.2 58.6 52.9 53.8 48.5 61.2 50.9 64.3 41.8 56.3 88.4
Strongly Favor 151 30.4% 29.7 31.2 39.0 28.4 27.1 30.8 25.8 30.9 26.4 42.9 17.0 31.1 48.3
Somewhat Favor 143 28.8% 26.8 30.8 37.1 30.2 25.9 23.1 22.7 30.4 24.5 21.4 24.7 25.2 40.1
Oppose 177 35.7% 39.8 31.6 21.0 37.7 37.6 41.0 45.5 33.1 45.5 35.7 51.5 38.8 8.8
Somewhat Oppose 70 14.1% 13.0 15.2 8.6 19.1 10.6 12.8 16.7 12.7 19.1 14.3 20.6 14.6 4.1
Strongly Oppose 107 21.6% 26.8 16.4 12.4 18.5 27.1 28.2 28.8 20.3 26.4 21.4 30.9 24.3 4.8
DK/Refused 25 5.0% 3.7 6.4 2.9 3.7 9.4 5.1 6.1 5.7 3.6 0.0 6.7 4.9 2.7
Mean 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.2 1.9 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.1 2.7 2.3 1.6
NET DIF 1 117 23.6% 16.7 30.4 55.2 21.0 15.3 12.8 3.0 28.2 5.5 28.6 -9.8 17.5 79.6
PAGE 44
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 45-1
Q40. Do you think the majority of residents in your city can afford to buy a home - yes or no?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent yes minus percent no)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Yes 438 43.8% 46.7 40.8 42.0 43.0 48.8 40.7 45.4 46.6 37.1 21.1 49.0 51.0 36.1
No 494 49.4% 48.6 50.2 52.7 51.7 45.3 49.4 45.4 47.6 53.3 68.4 43.2 43.2 57.2
DK/Refused 68 6.8% 4.7 9.0 5.4 5.3 5.9 9.9 9.2 5.8 9.6 10.5 7.8 5.8 6.7
NET DIF 1 -56 -5.6% -2.0 -9.4 -10.7 -8.7 3.5 -8.6 0.0 -1.0 -16.3 -47.4 5.9 7.8 -21.1
PAGE 45
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 46-1
Q41. In general, would you say that homelessness in the Treasure Valley is a major problem, somewhat of a problem, small problem or not a problem at all?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent major/somewhat minus percent small/not problem)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Major/Somewhat 641 64.1% 57.8 70.6 63.4 64.7 59.4 67.3 65.6 66.2 56.3 84.2 59.0 58.7 77.5
Major 147 14.7% 9.4 20.2 14.6 13.7 12.4 15.4 18.4 16.4 8.3 15.8 9.3 15.5 18.6
Somewhat 494 49.4% 48.4 50.4 48.8 51.0 47.1 51.9 47.2 49.7 47.9 68.4 49.8 43.2 58.9
Small/Not Problem 335 33.5% 40.4 26.3 34.6 33.0 38.2 30.9 30.7 31.9 40.0 10.5 39.8 39.8 20.4
Small 276 27.6% 31.2 23.9 28.8 27.3 34.7 23.5 23.3 27.2 30.0 10.5 30.5 34.5 18.6
Not a problem 59 5.9% 9.2 2.4 5.9 5.7 3.5 7.4 7.4 4.8 10.0 0.0 9.3 5.3 1.8
DK/Refused 24 2.4% 1.8 3.1 2.0 2.3 2.4 1.9 3.7 1.9 3.8 5.3 1.2 1.5 2.1
NET DIF 1 306 30.6% 17.5 44.3 28.8 31.7 21.2 36.4 35.0 34.2 16.3 73.7 19.3 18.9 57.2
PAGE 46
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 47-1
Q42. And in the past year would you say homelessness in the Treasure Valley has gotten better, gotten worse or stayed about the same?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent better minus percent worse)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Better 79 7.9% 9.6 6.1 8.8 8.0 5.9 12.3 4.3 8.4 6.7 5.3 7.6 8.3 8.8
Worse 294 29.4% 26.7 32.2 31.2 26.3 35.3 29.6 26.4 29.6 28.3 36.8 24.1 27.2 36.1
Stayed about the same 527 52.7% 55.1 50.2 53.7 55.7 49.4 46.3 55.8 52.9 52.5 42.1 58.0 55.8 47.7
DK/Refused 100 10.0% 8.6 11.4 6.3 10.0 9.4 11.7 13.5 9.1 12.5 15.8 10.2 8.7 7.4
NET DIF 1 -215 -21.5% -17.1 -26.1 -22.4 -18.3 -29.4 -17.3 -22.1 -21.2 -21.7 -31.6 -16.6 -18.9 -27.4
PAGE 47
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 48-1
Q43. In general, who should be most responsible for solving homelessness in the Treasure Valley?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent privately minus percent publicly)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Privately funded 423 42.3% 44.3 40.2 34.1 43.0 47.1 45.1 43.6 40.6 48.8 36.8 53.9 46.6 24.9
organizations like
non-profits and religious
charities
Publicly funded government 456 45.6% 42.4 49.0 55.6 43.3 42.4 42.0 44.2 47.1 39.2 52.6 33.2 44.7 65.6
programs
DK/Refused 121 12.1% 13.3 10.8 10.2 13.7 10.6 13.0 12.3 12.2 12.1 10.5 12.9 8.7 9.5
NET DIF 1 -33 -3.3% 2.0 -8.8 -21.5 -0.3 4.7 3.1 -0.6 -6.5 9.6 -15.8 20.7 1.9 -40.7
PAGE 48
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 49-1
Q44A. How concerned are you about the loss of farmland as a result of urban growth in the Treasure Valley - extremely, very, somewhat or not at all?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent extremely/very minus percent somewhat/not)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 504 504 264 240 100 138 85 84 97 367 130 5 216 103 138
Extremely/Very 237 47.0% 43.9 50.4 35.0 38.4 49.4 57.1 60.8 45.2 50.0 80.0 48.1 40.8 47.8
Extremely 123 24.4% 23.5 25.4 18.0 17.4 22.4 38.1 30.9 24.0 24.6 20.0 26.4 19.4 21.0
Very 114 22.6% 20.5 25.0 17.0 21.0 27.1 19.0 29.9 21.3 25.4 60.0 21.8 21.4 26.8
Somewhat/Not 260 51.6% 54.9 47.9 63.0 60.9 48.2 42.9 37.1 53.1 49.2 20.0 51.9 58.3 50.7
Somewhat 161 31.9% 32.2 31.7 38.0 36.2 29.4 23.8 28.9 31.6 33.8 20.0 32.4 32.0 33.3
Not at all 99 19.6% 22.7 16.3 25.0 24.6 18.8 19.0 8.2 21.5 15.4 0.0 19.4 26.2 17.4
DK/Refused 7 1.4% 1.1 1.7 2.0 0.7 2.4 0.0 2.1 1.6 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.4
NET DIF 1 -23 -4.6% -11.0 2.5 -28.0 -22.5 1.2 14.3 23.7 -7.9 0.8 60.0 -3.7 -17.5 -2.9
PAGE 49
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 50-1
Q44B. And how concerned are you about the loss of family farmers as a result of urban growth in the Treasure Valley - extremely, very, somewhat or not at all?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent extremely/very minus percent somewhat/not)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 496 496 246 250 105 162 85 78 66 369 110 14 194 103 147
Extremely/Very 229 46.2% 38.6 53.6 38.1 39.5 55.3 57.7 50.0 41.7 58.2 71.4 40.2 46.6 51.7
Extremely 130 26.2% 23.2 29.2 17.1 19.8 32.9 34.6 37.9 23.3 32.7 57.1 21.1 27.2 27.9
Very 99 20.0% 15.4 24.4 21.0 19.8 22.4 23.1 12.1 18.4 25.5 14.3 19.1 19.4 23.8
Somewhat/Not 257 51.8% 60.6 43.2 61.0 59.9 42.4 42.3 40.9 56.4 39.1 28.6 57.2 53.4 47.6
Somewhat 161 32.5% 33.3 31.6 31.4 40.7 28.2 24.4 28.8 35.0 24.5 21.4 39.2 31.1 28.6
Not at all 96 19.4% 27.2 11.6 29.5 19.1 14.1 17.9 12.1 21.4 14.5 7.1 18.0 22.3 19.0
DK/Refused 10 2.0% 0.8 3.2 1.0 0.6 2.4 0.0 9.1 1.9 2.7 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.7
NET DIF 1 -28 -5.6% -22.0 10.4 -22.9 -20.4 12.9 15.4 9.1 -14.6 19.1 42.9 -17.0 -6.8 4.1
PAGE 50
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 51-1
Q45. Which should be the priority in the Treasure Valley?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent increase minus percent preserve)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Increasing affordable 322 32.2% 35.3 29.0 38.0 34.7 33.5 26.5 24.5 36.5 20.0 10.5 24.1 35.4 41.8
housing
Preserving farmland 572 57.2% 55.7 58.8 54.6 56.7 52.4 61.1 62.6 53.0 68.8 78.9 67.8 53.4 48.8
DK/Refused 106 10.6% 9.0 12.2 7.3 8.7 14.1 12.3 12.9 10.5 11.3 10.5 8.0 11.2 9.5
NET DIF 1 -250 -25.0% -20.4 -29.8 -16.6 -22.0 -18.8 -34.6 -38.0 -16.4 -48.8 -68.4 -43.7 -18.0 -7.0
PAGE 51
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 52-1
Q46A. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: Agriculture is an important part of the economy in the Treasure Valley.
(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 504 504 264 240 100 138 85 84 97 367 130 5 216 103 138
Agree 472 93.7% 93.6 93.8 94.0 94.2 88.2 95.2 95.9 92.9 95.4 100.0 95.8 100.0 88.4
Strongly Agree 319 63.3% 61.4 65.4 40.0 58.0 65.9 78.6 79.4 60.2 71.5 80.0 64.8 68.0 60.1
Somewhat Agree 153 30.4% 32.2 28.3 54.0 36.2 22.4 16.7 16.5 32.7 23.8 20.0 31.0 32.0 28.3
Disagree 18 3.6% 3.8 3.3 1.0 4.3 7.1 4.8 1.0 3.8 3.1 0.0 3.2 0.0 8.0
Somewhat Disagree 12 2.4% 2.7 2.1 1.0 1.4 5.9 3.6 1.0 2.7 1.5 0.0 1.9 0.0 5.8
Strongly Disagree 6 1.2% 1.1 1.3 0.0 2.9 1.2 1.2 0.0 1.1 1.5 0.0 1.4 0.0 2.2
DK/Refused 14 2.8% 2.7 2.9 5.0 1.4 4.7 0.0 3.1 3.3 1.5 0.0 0.9 0.0 3.6
Mean 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.5
NET DIF 1 454 90.1% 89.8 90.4 93.0 89.9 81.2 90.5 94.8 89.1 92.3 100.0 92.6 100.0 80.4
PAGE 52
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 53-1
Q46B. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: Agriculture is an important part of the culture in the Treasure Valley.
(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 496 496 246 250 105 162 85 78 66 369 110 14 194 103 147
Agree 462 93.1% 91.5 94.8 92.4 93.8 94.1 93.6 90.9 92.4 95.5 92.9 97.9 90.3 87.1
Strongly Agree 345 69.6% 66.7 72.4 58.1 69.8 72.9 78.2 72.7 66.9 80.0 64.3 75.8 67.0 59.9
Somewhat Agree 117 23.6% 24.8 22.4 34.3 24.1 21.2 15.4 18.2 25.5 15.5 28.6 22.2 23.3 27.2
Disagree 33 6.7% 8.5 4.8 7.6 6.2 5.9 6.4 7.6 7.3 4.5 7.1 2.1 9.7 12.9
Somewhat Disagree 20 4.0% 5.3 2.8 3.8 4.3 4.7 3.8 3.0 4.3 2.7 7.1 1.0 6.8 7.5
Strongly Disagree 13 2.6% 3.3 2.0 3.8 1.9 1.2 2.6 4.5 3.0 1.8 0.0 1.0 2.9 5.4
DK/Refused 1 0.2% 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Mean 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.6
NET DIF 1 429 86.5% 82.9 90.0 84.8 87.7 88.2 87.2 83.3 85.1 90.9 85.7 95.9 80.6 74.1
PAGE 53
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 54-1
Q47. In the past year, would you say there has been more crime, less crime, or about the same amount of crime in your neighborhood?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent more minus percent less)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
More 184 18.4% 16.3 20.6 17.1 17.3 18.2 19.8 20.9 18.3 19.2 15.8 19.0 24.3 14.0
Less 146 14.6% 15.3 13.9 14.1 19.0 8.2 14.2 14.1 12.5 20.4 15.8 14.4 15.0 15.1
About the same 639 63.9% 66.5 61.2 68.3 62.0 69.4 62.3 57.7 66.2 56.7 68.4 62.4 58.7 69.8
DK/Refused 31 3.1% 2.0 4.3 0.5 1.7 4.1 3.7 7.4 3.0 3.8 0.0 4.1 1.9 1.1
NET DIF 1 38 3.8% 1.0 6.7 2.9 -1.7 10.0 5.6 6.7 5.8 -1.3 0.0 4.6 9.2 -1.1
PAGE 54
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 55-1
Q48. In general, how would you describe the neighborhood where you live - extremely safe, very safe, somewhat safe or not safe at all?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent extremely/very minus percent somewhat/not)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Extremely/Very 818 81.8% 80.4 83.3 78.5 87.3 85.3 78.4 75.5 85.3 71.7 78.9 85.6 76.7 83.5
Extremely safe 325 32.5% 33.7 31.2 37.1 30.0 35.3 35.8 25.2 35.1 24.6 36.8 33.7 29.6 33.0
Very safe 493 49.3% 46.7 52.0 41.5 57.3 50.0 42.6 50.3 50.3 47.1 42.1 52.0 47.1 50.5
Somewhat/Not 177 17.7% 19.2 16.1 21.5 12.7 14.1 21.0 22.7 14.3 27.5 21.1 14.4 23.3 16.5
Somewhat safe 156 15.6% 16.7 14.5 15.6 11.0 12.9 20.4 22.1 12.5 24.2 21.1 14.1 18.0 13.7
Not safe at all 21 2.1% 2.5 1.6 5.9 1.7 1.2 0.6 0.6 1.8 3.3 0.0 0.2 5.3 2.8
DK/Refused 5 0.5% 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 1.8 0.4 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NET DIF 1 641 64.1% 61.2 67.1 57.1 74.7 71.2 57.4 52.8 71.1 44.2 57.9 71.2 53.4 67.0
PAGE 55
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 56-1
Q49. And how would you rate the relationship between the police and residents in your community?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Excellent/Good 856 85.6% 85.5 85.7 82.0 87.0 91.2 86.4 81.0 87.4 82.9 68.4 89.8 78.6 88.8
Excellent 371 37.1% 38.0 36.1 33.7 38.0 40.0 36.4 37.4 38.2 34.6 31.6 43.9 37.4 30.9
Good 485 48.5% 47.5 49.6 48.3 49.0 51.2 50.0 43.6 49.2 48.3 36.8 45.9 41.3 57.9
Fair/Poor 123 12.3% 13.1 11.4 16.1 12.0 7.6 11.7 13.5 10.9 14.2 26.3 8.3 19.4 10.5
Fair 83 8.3% 8.4 8.2 11.2 8.0 3.5 8.6 9.8 7.3 10.0 10.5 5.9 11.2 8.4
Poor 40 4.0% 4.7 3.3 4.9 4.0 4.1 3.1 3.7 3.5 4.2 15.8 2.4 8.3 2.1
DK/Refused 21 2.1% 1.4 2.9 2.0 1.0 1.2 1.9 5.5 1.8 2.9 5.3 2.0 1.9 0.7
Mean 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.1 1.7 1.9 1.8
NET DIF 1 733 73.3% 72.4 74.3 65.9 75.0 83.5 74.7 67.5 76.5 68.8 42.1 81.5 59.2 78.2
PAGE 56
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 57-1
Q50. We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. Here is a seven-point scale on which the political views that people might hold are arranged from
very liberal to very conservative. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent Conservative minus percent Liberal)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Liberal 264 26.4% 26.1 26.7 37.6 23.7 23.5 24.1 22.7 28.3 20.0 26.3 5.1 20.4 66.7
Very Liberal 78 7.8% 6.5 9.2 11.2 5.7 5.3 6.8 11.0 9.2 3.3 5.3 1.5 4.4 22.1
Liberal 72 7.2% 7.3 7.1 10.7 7.0 7.1 4.3 6.1 7.5 6.7 5.3 1.5 2.9 18.2
Somewhat liberal 114 11.4% 12.4 10.4 15.6 11.0 11.2 13.0 5.5 11.5 10.0 15.8 2.2 13.1 26.3
Moderate 239 23.9% 23.1 24.7 24.9 30.0 21.2 24.7 13.5 24.7 20.8 26.3 20.7 39.3 21.1
Conservative 407 40.7% 43.9 37.3 28.8 39.3 45.9 45.7 47.9 38.5 48.3 42.1 70.0 31.1 7.7
Somewhat conservative 141 14.1% 14.9 13.3 13.2 14.3 11.8 16.7 14.7 14.5 13.8 5.3 17.8 16.0 5.3
Conservative 123 12.3% 12.7 11.8 6.8 10.3 19.4 11.7 16.0 11.4 14.6 21.1 23.4 5.8 2.5
Very Conservative 143 14.3% 16.3 12.2 8.8 14.7 14.7 17.3 17.2 12.5 20.0 15.8 28.8 9.2 0.0
DK/Refused 90 9.0% 6.9 11.2 8.8 7.0 9.4 5.6 16.0 8.6 10.8 5.3 4.1 9.2 4.6
NET DIF 1 143 14.3% 17.8 10.6 -8.8 15.7 22.4 21.6 25.2 10.2 28.3 15.8 64.9 10.7 -58.9
PAGE 57
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 58-1
Q51. Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent Republican minus percent Liberal)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Republican 410 41.0% 43.1 38.8 31.7 42.3 46.5 44.4 41.1 39.8 43.8 52.6 100.0 0.0 0.0
Strong Republican 204 20.4% 20.4 20.4 13.7 18.7 24.1 28.4 20.2 19.4 24.2 15.8 49.8 0.0 0.0
Not very strong 97 9.7% 8.2 11.2 6.3 11.7 11.8 9.9 8.0 9.0 12.1 10.5 23.7 0.0 0.0
Republican
Independent lean 109 10.9% 14.5 7.1 11.7 12.0 10.6 6.2 12.9 11.4 7.5 26.3 26.6 0.0 0.0
Republican
Democrat 285 28.5% 23.5 33.7 34.6 26.7 28.2 25.3 27.6 30.3 22.9 21.1 0.0 0.0 100.0
Strong Democrat 153 15.3% 13.1 17.6 14.6 11.3 18.8 16.0 19.0 17.5 8.8 10.5 0.0 0.0 53.7
Not very strong 45 4.5% 3.9 5.1 5.9 5.0 5.9 3.1 1.8 4.2 4.2 10.5 0.0 0.0 15.8
Democrat
Independent lean 87 8.7% 6.5 11.0 14.1 10.3 3.5 6.2 6.7 8.6 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.5
Democrat
Pure Independent 206 20.6% 24.5 16.5 24.4 23.0 18.8 17.9 16.0 20.8 20.4 21.1 0.0 100.0 0.0
Other 43 4.3% 3.9 4.7 4.4 5.0 2.9 6.2 2.5 3.9 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
DK/Refused 56 5.6% 4.9 6.3 4.9 3.0 3.5 6.2 12.9 5.2 7.1 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
NET DIF 1 125 12.5% 19.6 5.1 -2.9 15.7 18.2 19.1 13.5 9.5 20.8 31.6 100.0 0.0 -100.0
PAGE 58
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 59-1
Q52. What racial or ethnic group best describes you?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
White 881 88.1% 87.5 88.8 83.4 88.0 87.1 90.1 93.3 89.0 84.6 94.7 90.7 85.0 90.2
Non-White 95 9.5% 10.2 8.8 14.1 11.0 9.4 6.8 3.7 8.8 12.1 5.3 7.8 13.1 8.8
Latino or Hispanic 30 3.0% 2.9 3.1 5.4 4.0 2.9 1.2 0.0 2.3 5.0 5.3 2.2 1.5 4.2
Black 18 1.8% 2.4 1.2 5.4 1.0 1.2 0.6 0.6 1.4 3.3 0.0 1.5 2.9 1.8
Asian 5 0.5% 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.4
Native American 8 0.8% 1.0 0.6 0.5 1.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.7 1.3 0.0 0.7 1.0 1.1
Other 18 1.8% 2.2 1.4 0.5 1.3 3.5 3.1 1.2 2.0 1.3 0.0 0.7 4.9 0.4
Two or more 16 1.6% 1.0 2.2 2.0 3.0 0.6 0.0 1.2 1.8 1.3 0.0 2.0 2.4 1.1
DK/Refused 24 2.4% 2.4 2.4 2.4 1.0 3.5 3.1 3.1 2.2 3.3 0.0 1.5 1.9 1.1
PAGE 59
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 60-1
Q53. What is the highest level of education or training you have completed?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
High school 187 18.7% 19.6 17.8 20.5 15.0 15.3 19.8 25.8 15.2 28.3 36.8 16.6 18.9 15.8
Some high school 27 2.7% 2.5 2.9 3.4 2.3 1.8 0.0 6.1 2.0 5.0 0.0 2.0 3.4 1.4
High school degree or 160 16.0% 17.1 14.9 17.1 12.7 13.5 19.8 19.6 13.2 23.3 36.8 14.6 15.5 14.4
equivalent
Some College/Assoc 339 33.9% 30.8 37.1 33.2 28.7 32.9 39.5 39.9 32.6 37.1 47.4 36.6 41.7 28.4
Some college 206 20.6% 16.9 24.5 18.5 18.0 19.4 22.2 27.6 18.6 25.8 31.6 21.7 23.8 18.9
Associate's Degree 133 13.3% 13.9 12.7 14.6 10.7 13.5 17.3 12.3 14.0 11.3 15.8 14.9 18.0 9.5
Bachelor's Degree 275 27.5% 28.8 26.1 31.2 34.0 28.8 19.1 17.8 30.0 19.6 15.8 27.8 27.7 31.2
Graduate school 185 18.5% 19.4 17.6 14.1 21.7 19.4 20.4 15.3 20.8 13.3 0.0 18.5 11.2 24.2
Some graduate school 30 3.0% 3.1 2.9 1.0 3.3 4.1 2.5 4.3 3.5 1.7 0.0 3.9 1.0 3.5
Graduate degree 155 15.5% 16.3 14.7 13.2 18.3 15.3 17.9 11.0 17.3 11.7 0.0 14.6 10.2 20.7
DK/Refused 14 1.4% 1.4 1.4 1.0 0.7 3.5 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.7 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.4
PAGE 60
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 61-1
Q54. What is your religion?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Non-denominational Christian 210 21.0% 21.0 21.0 24.4 23.0 21.8 21.0 12.3 21.3 19.2 21.1 26.8 22.8 13.3
Mainstream Protestant 191 19.1% 20.2 18.0 7.3 13.0 23.5 22.2 37.4 17.1 25.8 15.8 25.6 14.6 14.4
Catholic 123 12.3% 12.7 11.8 8.3 12.0 17.1 15.4 9.8 12.5 11.7 15.8 11.2 14.6 15.1
Mormon 95 9.5% 8.4 10.6 6.3 14.0 5.3 9.3 9.8 9.5 10.0 5.3 15.6 6.3 4.6
Jewish 7 0.7% 0.2 1.2 0.0 1.0 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.4
Atheist/Agnostic 91 9.1% 10.2 8.0 14.1 10.3 6.5 3.7 8.6 10.2 6.3 5.3 3.4 10.2 18.2
Other 68 6.8% 4.7 9.0 6.8 10.3 6.5 4.3 3.1 6.7 7.1 10.5 5.6 5.8 6.0
No Religion 152 15.2% 16.9 13.5 24.9 13.0 10.6 13.6 13.5 16.2 12.1 21.1 8.5 19.4 21.1
DK/Refused 63 6.3% 5.7 6.9 7.8 3.3 7.6 9.9 4.9 5.8 7.1 5.3 2.7 6.3 6.0
PAGE 61
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 62-1
Q55. What is your relationship status?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Married 601 60.1% 62.9 57.1 39.5 76.7 64.7 59.9 50.9 60.6 58.8 63.2 70.7 55.3 54.4
Single 169 16.9% 19.4 14.3 31.2 11.0 14.7 18.5 10.4 16.8 16.3 15.8 11.2 16.5 23.2
In a relationship 99 9.9% 9.4 10.4 25.4 9.0 5.3 4.9 1.8 10.9 7.9 0.0 8.8 10.7 11.9
Widowed 59 5.9% 2.4 9.6 1.0 0.0 2.9 6.8 25.2 4.8 9.6 5.3 5.1 4.9 4.6
Divorced 53 5.3% 4.3 6.3 1.5 2.0 7.1 9.3 10.4 5.2 5.4 10.5 3.4 9.7 5.3
DK/Refused 19 1.9% 1.6 2.2 1.5 1.3 5.3 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.1 5.3 0.7 2.9 0.7
PAGE 62
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 63-1
Q56. Do you currently have any children enrolled in K-12 schooling?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent yes minus percent no)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Yes 322 32.2% 30.0 34.5 26.8 62.7 33.5 10.5 3.1 33.0 29.6 31.6 36.3 37.4 26.3
No 666 66.6% 68.8 64.3 72.2 36.3 63.5 88.9 96.3 65.8 69.2 68.4 63.4 61.7 73.7
DK/Refused 12 1.2% 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.0 2.9 0.6 0.6 1.2 1.3 0.0 0.2 1.0 0.0
NET DIF 1 -344 -34.4% -38.8 -29.8 -45.4 26.3 -30.0 -78.4 -93.3 -32.7 -39.6 -36.8 -27.1 -24.3 -47.4
PAGE 63
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 64-1
Q57. Do your children attend public, private or charter schools?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 322 322 153 169 55 188 57 17 5 243 71 6 149 77 75
Public 237 73.6% 73.2 74.0 80.0 72.3 68.4 82.4 80.0 74.5 74.6 50.0 73.2 74.0 74.7
Private 34 10.6% 9.8 11.2 1.8 11.7 15.8 11.8 0.0 9.9 11.3 33.3 12.8 6.5 10.7
Charter 41 12.7% 13.1 12.4 10.9 13.8 14.0 5.9 0.0 13.2 11.3 16.7 12.1 13.0 12.0
DK/Refused 10 3.1% 3.9 2.4 7.3 2.1 1.8 0.0 20.0 2.5 2.8 0.0 2.0 6.5 2.7
PAGE 64
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 65-1
Q59. Do you currently rent or own your home?
(NET DIF 1 - Percent rent minus percent own)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Rent 225 22.5% 25.1 19.8 47.3 22.7 12.4 13.0 11.0 23.6 19.6 15.8 16.6 28.6 27.4
Own 744 74.4% 72.4 76.5 46.8 76.3 82.9 85.8 85.3 73.8 77.1 63.2 81.7 68.4 70.2
DK/Refused 31 3.1% 2.5 3.7 5.9 1.0 4.7 1.2 3.7 2.6 3.3 21.1 1.7 2.9 2.5
NET DIF 1 -519 -51.9% -47.3 -56.7 0.5 -53.7 -70.6 -72.8 -74.2 -50.1 -57.5 -47.4 -65.1 -39.8 -42.8
PAGE 65
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 66-1
Q60. And finally, which of the following best describes your annual household income before taxes?
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
<$50,000 335 33.5% 32.7 34.3 43.9 26.7 24.1 27.8 48.5 31.3 37.9 57.9 30.7 36.4 36.5
Under $25,000 128 12.8% 12.0 13.7 19.5 7.0 8.8 11.7 20.2 11.3 16.3 26.3 7.6 14.6 16.5
$25,001-$50,000 207 20.7% 20.8 20.6 24.4 19.7 15.3 16.0 28.2 20.0 21.7 31.6 23.2 21.8 20.0
$50,001 to $100,000 267 26.7% 29.0 24.3 25.9 32.0 30.6 23.5 17.2 27.0 26.3 15.8 28.5 29.6 25.6
$50,001 to $75,000 171 17.1% 17.1 17.1 20.5 19.3 17.1 16.7 9.2 17.9 14.6 10.5 18.0 21.4 14.4
$75,001 to $100,000 96 9.6% 12.0 7.1 5.4 12.7 13.5 6.8 8.0 9.1 11.7 5.3 10.5 8.3 11.2
Over $100,000 168 16.8% 19.2 14.3 13.7 21.3 22.4 18.5 4.9 19.3 10.8 0.0 21.2 12.1 16.5
DK/Refused 230 23.0% 19.0 27.1 16.6 20.0 22.9 30.2 29.4 22.4 25.0 26.3 19.5 21.8 21.4
PAGE 66
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 67-1
Q61. Gender:
(NET DIF 1 - Percent male minus percent female)
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Male 510 51.0% 100.0 0.0 54.6 48.7 58.8 46.3 47.2 51.0 50.8 68.4 53.7 60.7 42.1
Female 490 49.0% 0.0 100.0 45.4 51.3 41.2 53.7 52.8 49.0 49.2 31.6 46.3 39.3 57.9
NET DIF 1 20 2.0% 100.0 -100.0 9.3 -2.7 17.6 -7.4 -5.5 1.9 1.7 36.8 7.3 21.4 -15.8
PAGE 67
***GS Stratetgy Group
Boise State University - Treasure Valley Research / September 23, 2016
Table 68-1
Version
BANNER 1
Q61 Gender Q1 Age Q6 County Q51 Party
============= ================================== ==================== ====================
Total N Total % Male Female 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Ada Canyon Owyhee Repub Indy Dem
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 1000 1000 510 490 205 300 170 162 163 736 240 19 410 206 285
Version A 504 50.4% 51.8 49.0 48.8 46.0 50.0 51.9 59.5 49.9 54.2 26.3 52.7 50.0 48.4
Version B 496 49.6% 48.2 51.0 51.2 54.0 50.0 48.1 40.5 50.1 45.8 73.7 47.3 50.0 51.6
PAGE 68