how to get your journal indexed in wos and scopus october 29, 2011 dr. mehrdad fahimi integrated...
TRANSCRIPT
How to Get your Journal Indexed in WoS and SCOPUS
October 29, 2011Dr. Mehrdad FahimiIntegrated Information Network
2
Background
• Ministry of Health and Medical Education’s Initiative to get Medical Journals Indexed in Major A&I databases
• Level of Medical Research
• International Exposure
• International Collaboration
• Funding
3
Comparison: Thomson Reuters (12000)
• Iran: 38 journals indexed in WoS– About 22 in Medicine
• Turkey: 74 journals indexed in WoS– About 40 in Medicine
4
Comparison: Elsevier (Scopus)all subjects (18,500)
• Iran: 88 journals indexed
• Turkey: 188 journals indexed
5
How to Get Indexed in WoS
The Foundation
Quality
Diversity Depth
Superior Collection Development
Unique Data
In-house Editorial Development Specialists
– ongoing detailed journal evaluation and selection processes.
Sciences – to 1900, A Century of Science
Social Sciences – to 1945
Arts & Humanities – to 1975
Journal selectivity, Cover-to-Cover Indexing,
Diversity, Consistency, Depth.
Author Cited References for over 110 years
Coverage of over 250 disciplines in the Sciences, Social Sciences, and Arts &
Humanities Comprehensive coverage in
all disciplines.
Web of Science
The Thomson Reuters Editorial process
• Our Goal • Build and maintain a multidisciplinary collection of world’s most important and
influential international and regional journals.• Professional librarians, information specialists, graduate degrees in science or
humanities.
• When are journals evaluated for coverage?• On an ongoing basis throughout the year.
Thomson Scientific Editorial Development
Journal Selection Process
Objective
Applied consistently to ALL publishers
Credible
• Cover to cover Indexing assures no gaps in the literature– All document types applied consistently across all titles to ensure precise searching
across disciplines
• Capture all cited references to articles in covered journals and to articles in journals not covered.
– ~40 million per year – consistently indexed – standardization
• What does this mean for the users at your institutions? -- presentation of “the best” body of journal information within their areas of interest.
Undergraduates – the vast majority just don’t know enough about individual journals to make these determinations on their own. They may simply take whatever they find -- and in the Web of Science they find quality by default.
Graduates/PhDs – Require a focus on what is most influential as their own academic intensity increases dramatically. They must quickly become familiar with the top publications of relevance to their studies.
Faculty – A multitude of benefits. • Efficient, Quality Current Awareness within their fields.• Citation-tracking capabilities across decades.• Where should I publish? – Web of Science journals are in fact the journals
included within the Journal Citation Reports. Research Administrators
What is the Impact of Funded Research and Where should I continue to Invest
Comprehensive Coverage and Consistent Indexing
• What is our Purpose?
• Build and maintain a multidisciplinary collection of world’s most important and influential international and regional journals.
• Who are we?• Professional librarians, information specialists, graduate
degrees in science or humanities.
• When are journals evaluated for coverage?• On an ongoing basis throughout the year.
Editorial Development - Background
Journal Selection Process
• Objective
• Applied consistently to ALL publishers
• Credible
Search >>> Measure >>> Evaluate
Web of Science - Journal Selection Process • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)
• Citation analysis• Self Citation Rate
• Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
• Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI)
Journal Selection Process
• Web of Science is comprehensive but not all inclusive.
• Small number of journals publish the bulk of significant scientific results.
• 300 journal produce more than half of what is cited and nearly a third of what is published.
• 3,000 journals produce 80% of published articles and 95% of cited articles.
• 2,200 journals evaluated annually– 15% accepted
First – Why is it that Thomson Scientific performs extensive journal “evaluations” to determine the content of its indexes?
Why this approach to journal coverage?
From the beginning, it was determined
by ISI founder Dr. Eugene Garfield
that ISI journal indexes would present
a select body of the world’s scholarly
journals – those which display a
significant level of international
influence within their respective
disciplines of study.
Basic Journal Publishing Standards
Editorial Content
Citation Analysis
The Components:
Notes:
We are “publisher-neutral”, no special consideration is given to a particular
publisher. Commercial, academic, open-access, etc. – all publishers are treated
the same with regard to individual journal evaluations.
Journal evaluations are “discipline-specific”, meaning that we only make
comparisons of journals publishing research within the same subject category.
In the Social Sciences, ISI utilizes between 50 and 60 subject categories.
Journal Evaluations - Traditional
Basic Journal Publishing Standards
Editorial Content
Citation Analysis
The Components:
• Timeliness of Publication – the ability to meet a pre-established publication schedule. This is very important, and is the reason why we typically examine three subsequently published issues at minimum, and often more.
• International Publishing Conventions – complete bibliographic information for journals, articles, and cited references.
• Peer Review• English language article titles, abstracts, and
keywords are highly desirable – in order to reach the widest possible audience.
ISI Journal Evaluations - Traditional
ISI Journal Evaluations - Traditional
Basic Journal Publishing Standards
Editorial Content
Citation Analysis
The Components:
• Editorial Scope
-- topics covered. Desirable?
-- the nature of overall content (original papers, review articles, “methods” papers, etc.)
-- appropriate intellectual level
• International Diversity of Editors and Authors – diversity is a very positive aspect as it serves to globalize the collection.
Subjective considerations are important here.
Essentially -- “What does this journal bring to the ISI database, to our collection of influential titles?”
Basic Journal Publishing Standards
Editorial Content
Citation Analysis
The Components:
• Journal Level – if the journal has been in existence for several years, a citation history will be available. This of course can be extremely valuable to the process. Measure of overall Citations, and approximate Impact Factor and Immediacy Index would be typical statistics utilized.
• Authors and Editors – an examination of individual citation histories for authors and editors is quite important, and in the case of a new journal is the only indication of the potential citation influence of that publication.
ISI Journal Evaluations - Traditional
…Journal SelectionCitation Analysis
• Crystallography– Fewer Articles, Fewer Citations
• Biotechnology, Genetics– Many Articles, Many Citations
• Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities– Slow citation growth
• Life Sciences– Rapid citation growth
Basic Journal Publishing Standards
Editorial Content
Citation Analysis
The Components:
ISI Journal Evaluations - Traditional
Comparing Results and Making Selections
Journals under evaluation are compared to journals that are already covered in the ISI database as well as other journals under evaluation – again this is done within the realm of specific subject categories.
In consideration of all factors, we look to include journals that display a clear level of influence as well as enhancing the subject coverage of the ISI database.
Going Forward...
... Journal Selection
Citation Analysis
- Established JournalsImpact Factor:
…the average number of times recent articles in a journal were cited in a particular year.
... Journal Selection
Citation Analysis
Emerging Infectious Diseases
2004 Impact factor: 5.643
Journal Citation Reports (JCR)Impact Factor Calculation
Journal: Emerging Infectious Diseases
Impact Factor: 5.643
Cites in 2004 to articles published in :
2003 = 1,5772002 = 1,572
02 + 03 = 3,149Number of articles published in:
2003 = 2812002 = 277
02 + 03 = 558Calculation:
Cites to recent articles 3,149 = 5.643Number of recent articles 558
Journal Citation Reports (JCR) -- Science EditionJournal: Emerging Infectious Diseases
Impact Factor: 5.643
Self citation rate: 8.80%
279 self citations / 3,149 Cites (02+03)
Journal of Original Research
374 articles published in 2004• 371 Original Research Papers• 3 Review Articles
Open Access Journal
…Journal Selection
Citation Analysis
Self Citations:
– 80% of all journals listed in the JCR Science Edition have self-citation rates of less than 20%.
– Excessive self-citation weakens the integrity of the journal’s Impact Factor.
– We look at self citation. If it is very high, it indicated a journal that either is very specialized, or it is indicative of a problem
25
A Brief Check List of Points to Remember for WoS Indexing• Please study various articles and essays recommended
• TR will need three (3) consecutive, current issues, as they are published, for any evaluation.
– Electronic Journal: provide full access information for any electronic title.
– Print Journal:• Establish an ongoing, complimentary subscription to the title for Thomson Reuters• Send the most current issue of the journal• Forward each subsequent issue as soon as each is published to the following address:
Thomson Reuters ATTN: Publication Processing 1500 Spring Garden Street Fourth Floor Philadelphia, PA 19130 USA
• Provide a cover letter introducing your journal with the following information. – Full Journal Title
– ISSN
– Publisher's Name and Address
– Editor's Name and Address
– Brief statement on the unique features of the journal and how it is distinguished from other journals in the field.
Visit the Thomson Scientific Web site at
http://www.isinet.com
Free Essays
http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/
Journal Selection Essay http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/selectionofmaterial/journalselection/
There are also essays and explanations on the Impact Factor.
27
How to Get Indexed in SCOPUS
What is the challenge?
Ove Kähler
Sr. Product Manager
Every day 5 titles are suggested to be added to Scopus …
Guess, what do these numbers stand for?
Where to draw the “Line of Relevance”?
Librarian: “I want to provide my users with an all-science database,
which indexes all relevant content.”
Researcher: “I want to make sure that all citations to all my papers
are being captured.”
Research manager: ”I want to have a complete picture of the
scientific output of my university/country.”
Scopus content has to address a diversity of needs …
Editor: “I want to track hot topics and see, how my journal is doing.”
31
Content Selection by CSAB (Content Selection & Advisory Board)
• Please Read the Statement by CSAB on Advice to journal editors and publishers: Securing accession for a journal to Scopus
• http://www.info.sciverse.com/UserFiles/CSAB_statement_Advice_to_journal_editors_and_publishers.pdf
• Suggest a Title– http://suggestor.step.scopus.com/suggestTitle.cfm
• Review by the independent and international CSAB
32
Minimum Suggestion Criteria
• The title should have peer reviewed content
• The title should be published on a regular basis (have a ISSN number that has been registered with the International ISSN Centre)
• The content should be relevant and readable for an international audience (for example have English language abstracts and references in Roman script)
• The title should have a publication ethics and publication malpractice statement
33
Selection Criteria
34
Some Comments by a CSAB Member (Dr. keyvan Kousha)
• Main Indicators– Content measures
• Citations to journal, quality of abstract, etc
– Structural issues
• Iranian Medical research: Good Impression on Reviewers
• Pitfalls:– Quality of abstract- This is the first thing reviewers read and decide on the journal.
At least one reviewer stressed that Iranian journals are relatively good in the region but they have poor abstract.
– Citation of editor – chief editor should be highly productive and cited person.
– Including international editorial board
– Website
Let’s apply the scoring system to two psychology journals,
both published in Eastern Europe, both started in 2005 …
Journal A Journal B
Category 1– Journal policy
Good editorial concept; convincing description of single-blind peer-review process; diversity among authors/editors.
Not very convincing editorial concept; no information about peer-review found; no international diversity among authors/editors.
23.1%
14.5%
25% of overall score
Journal A
Journal B
Category 2 – Presentation of Content
Substantial contribution to field.
Most papers cite exclusively Russian authors, i.e. do not take into account international research.
13.8%
11.3%
20% of overall score
Journal A
Journal B
Category 3 – Citedness
79% of all published articles have been cited >1. H-index of leading editors is 12.
Neither editors nor journal has received any citations in Scopus.
26.3%
0%
35% of overall score
Journal A
Journal B
Category 4 – Timeliness
Most recent issue as expected.
Publishing quarterly; last published issue six months before spotcheck (i.e. Dec 2008 vs Jun 2009).
10.0%
5.0%
10% of overall score
Journal A
Journal B
Category 5 – Accessibility
Homepage fully in English; good quality of homepage.
Homepage partly in English; fair quality of homepage.
9.5%
7.0%
10% of overall score
Journal A
Journal B
Result: The scoring system supports the reviewer in his task to position the two journals towards the “line of relevance”
Journal A
Reviewer:
accept journal
Journal B
Reviewer:
reject journal
http://suggestor.step.scopus.com/index.cfm
Admin
interface
Ask publishers to provide extra information and PDF’s
Reviewer
interface
Suggestor
interface
Suggest a title
…
Titles submitted for review per year
46
How Can I Improve My Journal?
• Active recruitment of high-impact articles by courting researchers
• Offering authors better services
• Boosting the journal’s media profile
• More careful article selection
Thank you!