i-95 corridor coalition · i-95 corridor coalition travel information services ptc 3/25/2015 1 i-95...

www.I95Coalition.org I-95 Corridor Coalition Travel Information Services PTC3/25/2015

1

I-95 Corridor Coalition

Travel Information Services PTC Meeting March 25, 2015

For audio, please dial (712) 775-7085 and enter 275742# at the prompt

www.I95Coalition.org I-95 Corridor Coalition Travel Information Services PTC2

Meeting Requests This is an in-person & virtual meeting – we would like to

attain the same experience for all participantsAll Participants – in person and via webcast

• Questions will be addressed at the end of each presentation• Please give your name and agency before asking your question

(at least the first time)

Participation in person• Please remember all sounds are picked up by the audio system

Participation via webcast• Please keep your phone muted until asking a question or speaking

(press *6 to mute/unmute individual phone lines)• Please do not place call “on hold” as your hold music will be

heard by the group

3/25/2015

www.I95Coalition.org I-95 Corridor Coalition Travel Information Services PTC

Housekeeping Items

3/25/2015

3

Additional Webcast & Audio Information

• Please call 610.662.5569 for difficulties with the web or audio application

Presentations will be posted

• Presentations will be posted to the I-95 Corridor Coalition website. Participants will receive a link the presentations after they are posted.

• Contact Information will be available at the end of this presentation


Meeting Participants

3/25/2015

4

In PersonAgency Name

FHWA Bob Rupert

New Jersey DOT Salvatore Cowan, James Hadden

New York State DOT Todd Westhuis

Pennsylvania DOT Mark Kopko

NJ Turnpike Authority Henry Eibel, Nellia Shakhmina

NJTPA Mary Ameen, Sutapa Bhattarcharjee, Brian Fineman, Keith Miller

Western Connecticut COG Carl Zimmerman

GEWI North America Eli Sherer

National Operations Center for Excellence Dennis Motiani

Total Traffic Network/iHeartMedia Hubert Clay

TRANSCOM Robert Bamford

I-95 Corridor Coalition George Schoener, Marygrace Parker

KMJ Consulting, Inc. Karen Jehanian

University of Maryland Michael Pack, Stan Young


Meeting Participants

3/25/2015

5

Via WebcastAgency Name Agency Name

FHWA Ek Phomsavath, Rich Taylor MetroPlan Orlando (FL) Eric Hill

Florida DOT Russell Allen, Jo Ann Oerter (Atkins)

Montgomery County Government (MD) Jenn Davis

New Hampshire DOT Denise Markow Montgomery County Transit (MD) Will Kenlaw

New Jersey DOT Neha Galgali, Kelly McVeigh MWCOG (DC) Wenjing Pu

New York State DOT Matt Vasilow Richmond Regional PDC (VA) Tiffany Dubinski

North Carolina DOT Kelly Wells Tri-County Regional PC (PA) Tom Edinger

Rhode Island DOT Bill Nordstrom (Jacobs) South Jersey TPO (NJ) Andrew Tracy

Vermont AOT Robert White I-95 Corridor Coalition Support Patty Reich

Virginia DOT Scott Cowherd KMJ Consulting, Inc. Joanna Reagle, Bridget Postlewaite


Please confirm that your line is

muted

Thank you!

3/25/20156


7

TISPTC Meeting AgendaTime Topic Speaker

9:30am to 9:50amWelcome from NJTPA & Introduction Mary K. Murphy & Mary Ameen, NJTPA

Coalition Welcome & Update George Schoener & Marygrace Parker, I-95 Corridor Coalition

9:50am to 10:15amTISPTC & VPP Project Updates• VPP Projects• Travel Info Stats for Major Travel Days (Trend Maps)• Winter Weather (ATMS/ATIS) in Mid-Atlantic/Southern region

Stan Young, University of MarylandKelly Wells, NCDOT (TISPTC Co-chair)

10:15am to 10:30am Break

10:30am to 11:00am Florida DOT 511 – What does the future hold? Russell Allen, FDOT & JoAnn Oerter, Atkins

11:00am to 11:30am RITIS in the I-95 Corridor George Schoener, I-95 Corridor CoalitionMichael Pack, UMD CATT Lab

11:30am to noon Travel Information in the Connected Vehicle environment Mark Kopko, PennDOT

Noon to 12:20pm Break to get Lunch

12:20pm to 12:40pm National Operations Center of Excellence (NOCoE) and how the Coalition can collaborate with them Dennis Motiani, NOCoE

12:40pm to 1:35pm Agency Updates on Travel Information (Roundtable Discussion)Agency Members (DOTs and MPOs)

Mary Ameen, NJTPA (TISPTC Co-chair) –Facilitator

1:35pm to 1:50pm Work Plan Marygrace Parker, I-95 Corridor CoalitionMary Ameen, NJTPA (TISPTC Co-chair)

1:50pm to 2:00pm TISPTC Upcoming Events & Meeting Wrap Up Mary Ameen, NJTPA (TISPTC Co-chair)


Welcome from NJTPA & Introductions

3/25/2015

8

Mary K. Murphy, Executive DirectorMary Ameen, Deputy Executive Director

NJTPA


Coalition Welcome & Update

3/25/2015

9

George Schoener &Marygrace Parker

I-95 Corridor Coalition


Coalition Update

3/25/2015 10

• New Chair of the Executive Board - Joan McDonald, Commissioner of the NYSDOT– Next Exec Board Meeting – May 28th

• Benefits of Coalition Membership– Connect – Deliver – Learn – Save

• New Coalition website coming soon• Work Zone Performance Monitoring Dashboard

Webcast –March 26, 2015, 1:00 PM-2:30 PM • Significant Events workshop coming up!


Significant Events Activities Update

• NASTO Significant Weather-Related Events Operational Response Information Coordination Regional Communication Program

– Project completed and report delivered – December 2014

• I-95 Coalition Collaborative Decision Tool

• Significant Events Response Conference – May 12 - 13, 2015

3/25/2015

11


Significant Events Response Conference:“Removing Barriers and Opening the Door

for Cross-Disciplinary Understanding and Coordination”

• Dates: May 12-13, 2015• Location: Maritime Institute, Linthicum Heights, MD• Sessions:

• Sig. Events Response - A Roadmap for All Levels & Disciplines• How to Do Business When It’s Not Business as Usual• Event Response – Tools You Can Use at Your Agency• A Roadmap for Implementation - Examples of Best Practices• Protecting ITS Networks• A Glimpse of the Future (Homeland Sec. Tech & TMCs of the future)

• More Info: Marygrace Parker ([email protected])

3/25/2015

12

mailto:[email protected]


TISPTC & VPP Project Updates

3/25/2015

13

Stan Young, University of MarylandKelly Wells, NCDOT (TISPTC Co-chair)


VPP ProjectsFirst multi-vendor validationArterial data quality report

Travel time courseVolume and OD initiative

3/25/2015

14

Stan Young, University of Maryland


VPP ProjectsFirst multi-vendor validation

Arterial data quality reportTravel time course

Volume and OD initiative

3/25/2015

15


PA-08 ValidationI-83 & I-81 Harrisburg

October 9 - 22, 2014• PA-08– 14 Segments– 31.3 miles

• Data collection– 2300 to 2555 total hrs– 71 to 80 hrs [0-30]– 53 to 66 hrs [30-45]

• AASE– 2.1 to 4.1 mph [0-30]– 3.1 to 5.8 mph [30-45]

16

3/25/2015


PA-08 PM Peak Hour (Oct 15-16, 2014)

3/25/2015

17


18

PA-08 10AM-7PM (Oct 13, 2014)


PA-08 ValidationLessons Learned

• All vendors were within spec• More similarities than differences• All individual reports, graphs and data

available for review• Challenges

• Maintain ‘Apples-to-Apples’ comparison• Timestamp consistency for Latency

19

3/25/2015


VPP ProjectsFirst multi-vendor validation

Arterial data quality reportTravel time course

Volume and OD initiative

3/25/2015

20


Nine Case Study Locations

21

State / Set ID

Road Number Road Name Validation

Date Span# of

Segments

# of Through

Lanes

AADT Range (in

1000s)

Length*(mile)

# Signals / Density

# of Access Points

Median Barrier

Speed Limit(mph)

NJ-11US-1 Trenton Fwy,

Brunswick Pike Sep 10 -24, 2013

10 2-4 33 - 90 14.2 10 / 0.7 112 Yes 55

NJ-42 Black Horse Pike 8 2 25-54 12.5 23 / 1.8 260 Yes 45-50

US-130 Burlington Pike 10 3 42 14.3 28 / 2.0 229 Yes 50

NJ-12NJ-38 Kaighn Ave.

Nov 5-19, 2013

16 2-4 32-80 24.5 44 / 1.8 235 Yes 50

NJ-73 Palmyra Bridge Rd. 18 2-4 33-74 23.9 41 / 1.7 236 Yes 45-55

PA-05US-1 Lincoln Highway

Dec 3 - 14, 2013

28 2 - 3+3 21 - 100 30.62 107 / 3.5 178 Yes 40 - 50

US-322 Conchester Highway 6 1-2 22 - 34 14.28 7 / 0.5 48 No 35 - 45

PA-06PA-611 Easton Rd

Jan 9 - 22, 2014

10 2-4 18-31 6.7 21/ 3.13 98 NO 40-45

PA-611 Old York Rd 8 1-2 21-30 7.3 26/ 3.56 105 Partial 15-40

PA-611 N Broad St 16 2-4 17-32 9.6 102/ 10.62 161 NO 15-40

VA-07VA-7

Leesburg Pike and Harry Byrd

Hwy April 5-16, 2014

30 2-4 45-60 30.5 57 / 1.9 203 Yes 35-55

US-29 Lee Hwy (S Washington St) 4 2 14-25 4.4 22 / 5 114 Partial 30

VA-08US-29 Lee Hwy May 8-19,

201426 2-4 15-45 31.9 115/3.6 287 Partial 35-50

MD-08 MD-140Reistertown Rd June 5-14,

201412 1 - 3 19-44 10.5 40 / 3.8 148 No 30-40

Baltimore Blvd 6 2 - 4 40-53 11.0 16/ 1.5 38 YES 45-55

• 9 Case Studies from 2013-14• Spans NJ through NC• Test extent of probe data

>20K AADT & 2+ lanes• Range of signal density and access• Objective: Reference case studies

3/25/2015


Arterial Probe Data Recommendations - 2013

Likely to have usable probe data (GOOD)

Possibly usable probe data (MIXED)

Unlikely probe data is usable (POOR)

• AADT >40000 &• 2+ lanes &• <= 1 signals per mile• Principal Arterials

(HPMS)• Limited Curb cuts

• AADT >20000 &• 2+ lanes &• <= 2 signals per mile• Minor Arterials

(HPMS) • Should be tested

• Low volume, < 20K AADT or

• >=2 signals per mile• Major Collectors

(HPMS)• Not recommended

22

• Probe data is anticipated to improve in time• Increased probe density and better processing

• As Probe data degrades, delay is underestimated• As probe technology matures, measured delay may increase• Challenged by queuing or cycle failure• Not sensitive to / confused by bi-modal traffic patterns

3/25/2015


Arterial Data Quality - 2014

23

• Expectations are running ahead of reality – Probe data works on highest class arterials– Use with caution on mid class and below

• Queuing and cycle failures remain challenging

• Travel time is the measure of choice– Point pair processing is critical– Distribution of travel time also needed– CDF’s tell a concise story

• Facilitates before/after, degradation in time, compare difference facilities, different signal timings

3/25/2015


Future Validations

• US-1 in VA• DC to Fredericksburg• 50 miles• Currently being processed

• Spring 2015• Maryland Supplemental

Coverage (120 miles all three vendors)

• Freeway & Arterial

24

3/25/2015


Maryland Supplemental Coverage

25

3/25/2015




3/25/2015

26


CITE Travel Time Course• Blended class offered through CITE

– Mostly independent study, occasional teleconferences

– First course currently ongoing• Class split up into four units:

– Travel Time and Travel Time Reliability– Measuring Travel Time– Travel Time Applications– Case Studies

3/25/2015

27




3/25/2015

28


Real-Time Volume & O/D• UMD CATT initiated February 2015

– Originally attempted with re-compete• Revised Volume and OD white paper

– Discussions with industry ongoing• Investigating Freight • Anticipate cooperative research approach

– Industry / Academia / States– Anticipate draft proposal April 1

3/25/2015

29


Travel Info Stats for Major Travel Days

(Trend Maps)

3/25/2015

30

Kelly Wells, NCDOT & TISPTC Co-Chair


Using VPP Suite Trend Maps for Holiday/Event Travel Planning

3/25/2015

31

• Trend Maps – Part of the VPP Suite– Interactive & animated– Can be embedded in

agency websites & distributed in press releases

– Help inform motorists about historical travel conditions, such as just before, during, & after major holidays.

– Intent is to inform motorist about expected conditions and allow them to make better departure decisions.


Webcast Summary: Using VPP Suite Trend Maps for Holiday/Event Travel Planning

3/25/2015

32

• The result of a Coalition project, working with NCDOT, VDOT and UMD CATT Lab, to provide an easier way for member agencies to provide travel information.

• Held in December 2014

• 40+ persons from DOTs & MPOs participated

• Participants learned how to use trend maps for travel info notices for holidays & other major events.

• Thanks to the presenters – Kelly Wells (NCDOT), Wenjing Pu (MWCOG), Mena Lockwood (VDOT) & Michael VanDaniker (UMD CATT Lab).

• Project Questions: Kelly Wells, NCDOT, [email protected]

• Trend Map Tool Questions: UMD CATT Lab at [email protected]




Winter Weather (ATMS/ATIS) in Mid-Atlantic/Southern

Regions

3/25/2015

33

Kelly Wells, NCDOT & TISPTC Co-Chair


Project Overview

3/25/2015 34

• Determine best practices for collecting & disseminating weather related travel conditions by public agencies focusing on Mid‐Atlantic & Southern Regions. 1. Conducted a workshop with agencies to identify

current practices in these states. (Participating states: PA, MD, VA, NC, SC, TN)

2. Conducted a scan of DOT Travel Info websites to determine the data and format of the road conditions due to winter weather.


Workshop Purpose & Questions

3/25/2015 35

Workshop Purpose:• Discuss the current travel info practices for winter weather events in

regions that do not frequently experience severe winter weather including the Mid-Atlantic and Southern regions

• Establish basic functional requirements for an ATMS/ATIS system that would be useful for agencies in these regions.

Main Discussion Questions:• How do you collect data on road conditions due to winter weather?• What winter weather road condition information do you provide to

the public?• Looking ahead, what changes might you make to how you collect

and disseminate winter weather related road conditions?


Basic Functional Requirements

3/25/2015 36

What should DOTs look for in new ATMS software:

– Frequency of reporting – Road conditions & granularity – providing more than the public

needs but information good for DOT employees– If road condition information is too general the public might lose

something– Standard definitions– Coverage – what about conditions of county and city roads?– How to communicate completion of events– Include all hazards (flooding, debris, etc.)– How should we be using Social Media?


Winter Weather (ATMS/ATIS) in Mid-Atlantic/Southern Regions

Next Steps

3/25/2015 37

• Share and post project results with all TISPTC agency members.

• Continue discuss among agencies as appropriate during future TISPTC & other Coalition program activities


Break (15 min)

3/25/2015

38


Florida DOT 511 – What does the future hold?

3/25/2015

39

Russell Allen, Florida DOT

Jo Ann Oerter, Atkins

I 95 Corridor Coalition – TISPTC MeetingMarch 25, 2015

Russell Allen, PEITS Program Development Engineer

FDOT Traffic Engineering and Operations - ITS Section

Background FDOT Upper management desire was to remove IVR Thinking was “No bang for the buck” However what we found:

Bi-annual survey and system reports show more than 50% of system users are from IVR

Demographics supported keeping IVR for now Purpose to craft vision of FL 511’s future

413/25/2015

FL511 Charrette• April 17th and 18th, 2014• Orlando, Florida• Moderated by ITS America• Public Agency/Academia Attendees:

42

Iowa Department of Transportation Central Florida Expressway Florida Department of Transportation

Secretary’s Office Chief Engineer’s Office Traffic Operations Office Statistics Office District 2

Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise Georgia Department of Transportation Metropolitan Transportation Commission Miami Dade Expressway Tennessee Department of Transportation University of Maryland CATT Lab Virginia Department of Transportation

3/25/2015

Private Sector Attendees: AASHTO American Automobile Association

(AAA) Atkins Global Federal Highway Administration

(FHWA) Here IBI Group

IBM Information Logistics Group INRIX Iteris ITS America Verizon

FL511 Charrette

433/25/2015

Strategy Recommendations Identify core competencies Define core vs. non-core FL511 tiers/work areas Create Service Definitions that tailor information

for certain users (i.e. – commercial drivers) Create comprehensive market reach metrics that

measure service reach of public and private information service providers

Use Invitation to Negotiate process to evaluate private market service capabilities (technology and service)

443/25/2015

Make public agency data available to all legitimate requesters

Create application programming interfaces for key data sets

Remove voice requirement from legislation

Policy Recommendations

453/25/2015

System Usage

YEAR

NUM

BER

OF C

ALLS

/APP

SES

SION

S

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

6,000,000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

App SessionsPhone Calls

FL 511 CALLS vs. APP SESSIONS PER YEAR

3/25/2015

Expand on multi-modal offerings Create a modular FL511 architecture that allows

for independent and not interdependent modules Maintain interactive voice response capability, but

separate the platform Explore outsourcing of FL511 modules

FL511 System Consideration Recommendations

473/25/2015

FDOT Management Makes Decision on How to Move Forward with FL 511

Terminate entire FLATIS system

Terminate IVR only

Modify functionality

of IVRRetain FLATIS Functionality

Modify FDOT Legislation

Develop a Data Fusion System

FL511 Charrette

483/25/2015

SUNGUIDE

SOFTWARE

DATA FUSION SYSTEM

Email Notifications

FL 511 Web Site

Video Aggregation System

Phone Alerts

Text Alerts

FL 511 IVR

iPhone App

Android App

Third Party API

FL511 Charrette

493/25/2015

Where to go from here Research

What’s out there now? Not just 511 systems

Web survey Accept that we don’t have to do it all

When do people look to us? What do we want to look like moving forward? Ensure the system is flexible Dynamic vs. static dissemination Drafting the new ITN/RFP

503/25/2015

Russell Allen, PEITS Program Development Engineer

FDOT Traffic Engineering and Operations - ITS Section

[email protected]


RITIS in the I-95 Corridor

3/25/2015

52

George Schoener, I-95 Corridor Coalition

Michael Pack, UMD CATT Lab


Travel Information in the Connected Vehicle

Environment

3/25/2015

53

Mark Kopko, PennDOT

Connected VehiclesMark Kopko

Sr. Civil EngineerBureau of Maintenance and Operations

[email protected]

3/25/2015

Connected Vehicles

• What is the DOT’s role?– Public Sector vs. Private Sector– Federal vs. State vs. Local

• Potential Paradigm Shift?

• Revolutionary vs. Evolutionary

• Easy to fall behind!

3/25/2015 55

PennDOT’s Approach

Stay Informed & Make Your Voice Heard

Try To Understand The Implications

Start Small & Work With Partners

Bigger Than One Person

Come Up With A Plan3/25/2015

56

Stay Informed & Make Your Voice Heard

Connected Vehicle Pooled Fund Study• Started in 2009

– 14 Core Members

• Purpose - To aid transportation agencies in justifying and promoting the large scale deployment of Connected Transportation Systems through modeling, development, engineering and planning activities.

• 3 Ongoing Projects– Multi-Modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System [Ongoing]– Tracking the Status of CV Test Beds Deployment [Ongoing]– Surveying/Mapping for CV Applications [Ongoing]– Road Weather Reporting [On Hold]– TMCs in a Connected Environment [Completed]

AASHTO Deployment Coalition• Purpose - Created in 2004 to discuss the technological

development, business cases, and outreach associated with connected vehicles. 3/25/2015 57


• 14,000 Traffic Signals– Only 9 are owned by the DOT– 1,000 Electro-mechanical– 2,000 have backhaul

$722,400,000 for PA

3/25/2015 58


• 40,000 miles– Assume average DSRC range of ¼ mile (radius)– 80,000 RSU for 100% coverage

• $17,600 x 80,000 = $1,408,000,000

• DSCR vs. Cellular/Satellite

3/25/2015 59

Try To Understand The ImplicationsACTIVE PASSIVE

Rea

l-Tim

e

Traditional Traveler Information

Hands-Free Apps• Waze• LA, NJ, NY, PA & WV

DMS

ConnectedVehicles

Poin

t In

Tim

e

3/25/2015 60


• Partnership with Carnegie Mellon University– Cranberry Township Test Bed

• Route 19 (1.8 miles)• 11 DSRC equipped signals

– Pittsburgh Test Bed• Baum and Center (1.3 miles)• 23 DSRC equipped signals

– Pittsburgh Test Bed II [Future]• Boulevard of the Allies (.5 miles)• 5 DSRC equipped signals

• PennDOT Deployments– Pittsburgh Test Bed [Coming Soon]

• McKnight Road (4.5 miles)• 11 DSRC equipped signals

3/25/2015 61


3/25/2015 62

Bigger Than One Person

Internal Working Group• Goal:

Ensure that Pennsylvania is prepared to facilitate the deployment of automated and connected vehicle technologies.

• Recognize the Implications of this Technology

• Stakeholders

• Strategic Plan

• Operations• Signals• Traveler Info• Maintenance• Planning/Research

• Safety• Driver’s Licensing• Press• Legal• Transit

• Districts• PTC• Academia• MPOs• FHWA

3/25/2015 63

Come Up With A Plan

PennDOT/CMU 2040 Analysis• Analysis of the impacts of connected and autonomous

vehicles on the Pittsburgh region from present day until 2040– Task 1 – Expert Workshop with PennDOT Leadership

– Task 2 – Impacts to Design and Investment Decisions

– Task 3 – Real-Time Data Usage

– Task 4 – Impacts to Existing Infrastructure

– Task 5 – Impacts to Workforce and Training Needs

– Task 6 – Impacts to Driver Licensing

– Task 7 – Impacts to Communication Devices and Investments

– Task 8 – Impacts to Freight Flow

• Final Report July 20143/25/2015 64

CV/AVStrategic

Plan

2015 Guidance AASHTO

Footprint Analysis

NCHRP 03-101

Proposed CV PilotsProposed

NCHRP 20-102

NCHRP 20-

24(98)

CMU 2040

Analysis

PFS Projects

Come Up With A Plan

3/25/2015 65

Questions???

“The car as we know it, and how it’s used in people’s lives, is going to change really dramatically and it’s going to change fast.”Bill Ford Jr., Executive Chairman (April 2013)

Mark KopkoSr. Civil EngineerBureau of Maintenance and [email protected]

3/25/2015 66

www.I95Coalition.org I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project3/25/2015

67

Thank you for your commitment to the Coalition

Best Wishes, Bob Pento!


68

Working Lunch

Break between sessions(noon to 12:20 pm)


National Operations Center of Excellence (NOCoE)

& how the Coalition can collaborate with them

3/25/2015

69

Dennis Motiani, NOCoE

March 25, 2015

&

70

How would you respond to these?• Your agency has unlimited funding.• Adding extra capacity is not an issue.• Stakeholders do not hold you accountable.• TSM&O is well understood, accepted, practiced by everybody including

the policy makers.• Plenty of appropriate training opportunities are available.• TSM&O is a very mature facet of transportation here.• You share all noteworthy practices with others around the country.

713/25/2015

National Operations Center of Excellence

Team, shared facility or an entity collaborating to pursue TSM&O excellence Leadership Knowledge synthesis Identify best practices and guidance Identify research needs Workshops and training Facilitate peer-to-peer relationships and community

forums

KTS EKTS NOCoE

723/25/2015

To serve as a focal point for sharing up-to-date information and to provide professional development through an actively managed website, peer exchange workshops, webinars, and a communal hub for TSM&O practitioners.

“Mission” as it appears in Board’s Charter

733/25/2015

• Educate, train and develop transportation agency officials and other TSM&O practitioners by offering reliable information and professional development opportunities.

• Continuously engage stakeholders in developing and evaluating the NOCoE’s programs and activities.

“Goals” as they appears in Board’s Charter

743/25/2015

Why Now?

Strong growing recognition of the importance of operations

SHRP2 Reliability Research product implementation underway presents an opportunity to leverage resources

Organizing for reliability

Regional operations forums

Knowledge Transfer System, or KTS

FHWA Encouragement, Financial Support & Association Commitment

753/25/2015

Builds from the Strengths of the Organizations

763/25/2015

773/25/2015

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMA6Cfg2UEU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMA6Cfg2UEU

NOCoE Structure

783/25/2015

79

Resources on Website

Discussion Platform

Technical ServicesImage courtesy- ourkittery.com

3/25/2015

www.transportationops.org

Resources on Website

803/25/2015

http://dev.transportationops.org/

• Regional TSM&O best practice peer exchanges• National TSM&O summit• Training and workshops• Development of case studies• Capturing best practices and research needs• Assessing initial state of TSM&O R&D in the United States • Ongoing support for selected SHRP2 products• Support Regional Operations Forums• “Lead agency and best practices” peer exchange webinars

81

Technical Services

3/25/2015

Longer-Term Opportunities for Coordination and Leveraging of Resources

• Coordination with USDOT− FHWA Operations programs including ICM, ATM, CMM,

etc.− Tolling and Pricing Programs− US DOT on Connected Vehicle Programs− NHI/CITE on Trainings offered

• Coordination and alignment with National Operations Academy• MSCC/Pool fund – TMC, CV, North/West Passage, I-95 CC• Other Associations – AMPO, NACE APTA, IBTTA, ASCE• Universities• Private Sector

823/25/2015

833/25/2015

How can we work together?

&

84

85

Q & ASession

Dennis MotianiExecutive Director

[email protected]

3/25/2015



86

Agency Updates on Travel Info: A Roundtable Discussion

Participating Agency Members

Mary Ameen, NJTPA (TISPTC Co-chair)Facilitator


Work Plan

3/25/2015

87

Marygrace Parker, I-95 Corridor Coalition

Mary Ameen, NJTPA (Co-chair)


Coalition Focus Areas

1. Intermodal Movement of Freight and Passengers

2. Coordinated Incident Management & Safety (includes Significant Events)

3. Travel Information Services

3/25/2015

88


TISPTC Focus AreasCoalition Work Plan Focus Areas: 2015 - 2016

1. Support Collaboration and Sharing of Best Practices for TISPTC Members

2. Progressing VPP Activities

3. Planning and Performance Measures

Note: Significant Events, previously a TISPTC focus area, is now part of “Coordinated Incident Management & Safety” PTC

3/25/2015

89


Work Plan Process: Program Year (2015-2016)

Timeframe:• Through Early-March 2014: Solicit Project Ideas from

Agency Members• March 5, 2014: Project Ideas dueMarch 25, 2015: Proposals are discussed at TISPTC

meeting. • Mid-April: Project proposals, from all committees, are

consolidated for Steering Committee review. A recommended work plan is developed.

• Late-May: Steering Committee submits Consolidated Coalition Work Plan to the Executive Board for Approval.

3/25/2015

90


Questions/Discussion on Work Plan

3/25/2015

91


Development of Operational Standardized Performance Measures

Potential TISPTC Project Idea

Problem statement:

Can data typically collected by DOTs (core raw data) be standardized for all states so that consistent outcome performance measures can be developed

– TMCs collect various data elements related to service patrols, message boards etc.

3/25/2015

92

www.I95Coalition.org I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project

Open Source DataGeneral Transit Feed Specification (GTFS)

Information on Transportation

OptionsStandardize

Data

End-UserInformation

Delivery

March 25, 2015

93


TISPTC Upcoming Events & Meeting Wrap Up

3/25/2015

94

Mary Ameen

NJTPA & TISPTC Co-Chair


Coalition Meetings of Interest– Work Zone Performance Monitoring Dashboard Webcast

• March 26, 2015 (1:00pm – 2:30pm)

– VPP Suite User Group Webcast• April 8, 2015

– VPPII Agency Project Team & Arterial Webcast• April 30, 2015

– Corridor wide Significant Events Conference• May 12-13, 2015, Maryland Maritime Institute, Linthicum, Maryland

– Coalition Executive Board Meeting• May 28, 2015, MWCOG offices, Washington DC

– TISPTC Meeting/Webcast• October/November 2015 (Date/Time to be determined)

95

Other Meetings of Interest– ITE Technical Conference and Exhibit

• March 29 – April 1, 2015, Tucson, Arizona

– ITS America• May 31 – June 3, 2015, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

– TRB International Symposium on Data and Performance Measures

• June 1 – 2, 2015, Denver, Colorado

– NASTO Annual Meeting• June 7 – 9, 2015, Wilmington, Delaware

– SASHTO Annual Meeting• August 1 – 4, 2015, Nashville, Tennessee

– ITE 2015 Annual Meeting and Exhibit• August 2 – 5, 2015, Hollywood, Florida

3/25/2015 96


Thank You

3/25/2015

97


Additional Information

www.I95Coalition.org

3/25/2015

98

TISTPC Co-chairs Coalition & Support

Mary Ameen

[email protected]

Marygrace Parker

[email protected]

Kelly Wells [email protected]

Todd Westhuis

[email protected]

Joanna Reagle

[email protected]

http://www.i95coalition.org/






i-95 corridor coalition · i-95 corridor coalition travel information services ptc 3/25/2015 1 i-95...

Documents