ieee-sa icap gen overview 15 pdh final (사이즈변경)
TRANSCRIPT
IEEE-SA Conformity Assessment
Presented for IEEE Standards Association By:Paul HeitmannBusinovation, LLC.Program Manager IEEE1547.1October 2015
3
The world’s largest professional association
426,000+Members
426,000+Members
426,000+Members
1,600+Annual Conferences
1,600+Annual Conferences
1,600+Annual Conferences
160+Countries160+
Countries160+
Countries
180+Top-cited Periodicals
180+Top-cited Periodicals
180+Top-cited Periodicals
Global Reach
Technical Breadth3,500,000
Technical Documents3,500,000
Technical Documents3,500,000
Technical Documents39 Technical Societies
6 Technical Councils
39 Technical Societies
6 Technical Councils
39 Technical Societies
6 Technical Councils
§ Aerospace and Electronic Systems
§ Antennas and Propagation
§ Biometrics Council
§ Broadcast Technology
§ Circuits and Systems
§ Communications
§ Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology
§ Computational Intelligence
§ Computer
§ Consumer Electronics
§ Control Systems
§ Council on Electronic Design Automation
§ Council on Superconductivity
§ Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation
§ Education
§ Electron Devices
§ Electromagnetic Compatibility
§ Engineering in Medicine and Biology
§ Geoscience and Remote Sensing
§ Industrial Electronics
§ Industry Applications
§ Information Theory
§ Instrumentation and Measurement
§ Intelligent Transportation Systems
§ Magnetics
§ Microwave Theory and Techniques
§ Nanotechnology Council
§ Nuclear and Plasma Sciences
§ Oceanic Engineering
§ Photonics
§ Power Electronics
§ Power & Energy
§ Product Safety Engineering
§ Professional Communications
§ Reliability
§ Robotics and Automation
§ Sensors Council
§ Signal Processing
§ Social Implications of Technology
§ Solid-State Circuits
§ Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
§ Systems Council
§ Technology and Engineering Management
§ Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
§ Vehicular Technology
IEEE Organization
IEEEMEMBERS
IEEEMEMBERS
Board of DirectorsBoard of Directors
PublicationActivities
PublicationActivities IEEE-USAIEEE-USA Educational
ActivitiesEducational
Activities
Member & Geographic
Activities
Member & Geographic
Activities
IEEE Standards
Association
IEEE Standards
Association
Technical ActivitiesTechnical Activities
Executive CommitteeExecutive Committee
Exec Director& Staff
Exec Director& Staff
4
§Aerospace Electronics
§Broadband o/Power Line
§Broadcast Technology
§Clean Technology
§Cognitive Radio
§Design Automation
5
§ 1,100 IEEE standards are active as of 2014, 101 of which were approved in 2014 (64 new, 37 revised)§ 561 standards projects were under development as of 2014, 165 of which were added in 2014.§ Nearly 7,000 IEEE-SA Individual Members and 200+ IEEE-SA Corporate Members as of 2014.
§Electromagnetic Compatibility
§Green Technology
§Ethernet/Wi-Fi
§Medical Device Communications
§Nanotechnology
§Organic Components
§Portable Battery Technology
§Power Electronics
§Power & Energy
§Radiation/Nuclear
§Reliability
§Transportation Technology
IEEE Standards span a broad spectrum of technologies, such as:
IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA)VisionBe recognized as a preferred global provider of high-quality, market-relevant technology standards and of services that promote their universal adoption
MissionEnable and promote the collaborative application of technical knowledge to advance economic and social well-being through the development of technical standards and related activities
Two Types of Standards Development
Individual
• Participants are “individuals”: i.e., people• Individuals represent themselves• Each individual participant has one vote• Ballot groups are made up of a minimum of 10 individuals• Ballot group participants must be IEEE-SA individual members
Entity (Corporate)
• Participants are “entities,” i.e., companies, universities, government bodies, etc.
• Designated representative and alternate represent the entity• Each entity has one vote• Standards project initiation requires 3 entities to commit to
membership and payment of appropriate dues• Entity sends representatives to participate in standards
development meetings
6
IEEE-SA Rigorous Standards Process
Consensus
Due Process
Openness
Right ofAppeal
Balance
The widely respected IEEE-SA standards-development process produces results that reflect the collective, consensus view of participants and enables industry to achieve specific objectives and solutions
7
No Restrictions in Engagement
8
- Open in membership, participation and governance
- No restrictions
- Any individual or organization globally
- Any industry or size of company
Complete Business Lifecycle
IEEE-SA provides industry a framework of solutions to ensure rapid introduction of new technologies to marketIEEE-SA provides industry a framework of solutions to
ensure rapid introduction of new technologies to market
9
P R O F E S S I O N A L SE R
VI C
ES
E - TOOLS
IND
US
TR
Y C
ON
NE
CT IO
N S
Pre-
Stan
dard
s:Standards
Implementation:
ICAP/Registration Authority
Vis
ion
Activ
ities
Individual-based/Entity-base d
Development
Standards
Understanding Conformity AssessmentConformity Assessment Definition:
– Conformity Assessment are the processes used to demonstrate and document that a product or service meets specific requirements (as set forth in Standards, Test Plans, etc.)
Conformity Assessment Benefits:– Provides assurance and confidence to purchaser that a
product or service meets requirements– Empowers the user to make better purchasing decisions– Benefits the supplier as products may gain market
acceptance and also create/enlarge new markets
Conformity Assessment Activities Include:– Conformance, Interoperability, Inspection, Accreditation– “Catch-all” term to address range of test-related activities– Sponsoring industry collaborative pilot programs
12
Types of Conformity Assessment
1st Party / Suppliers Declaration of Conformity (SDOC)– Self Declaration ; Companies conduct their own testing
2nd Party Conformity Assessment– Conformity assessment conducted by the end purchaser of
products (e.g., Service Providers) to ensure purchased products are deemed compliant or interoperable. Ie “Acceptance Testing”
3rd Party Conformity Assessment– Conformity assessment being determined by an independent
body. Ie “Compliance Certification”
Related International Standards
Accreditation Bodies – ISO/IEC 17011
Certification Bodies - ISO/IEC 17065
Test Labs – ISO/IEC 17025
13
ICAP Completes the IEEE-SA Business/Standards Lifecycle
ICAP is a Program of
IEEE-SA
15
In the domain of Standards Implementation Services
IEEE Conformity Assessment Program
IEEE Conformity Assessment Program (ICAP) is a critical component of IEEE SA’s Standards Implementation services
ICAP started in 2008 as a joint initiative of IEEE SA and IEEE-ISTO and as of October 2014 is wholly operated by IEEE SA
ICAP provides an industry support and operational structure that bridges standards development activities with the conformity assessment activities
ICAP is an important initiative in achieving IEEE SA’s strategic objectives and will have ongoing support from SA and IEEE.
Successful ICAP programs will accelerate market acceptance and enable new products and technologies in support of IEEE Standards.
16
Values of ICAP Certification
17
Convenience
§ Intrinsic connection with IEEE-SA working groups and supporting staff§ Enable certification programs based on converging technologies that covers multiple technologies IEEE-SA works on
Full-Spectrum Service
§ Turnkey Certification Management program, including Conformance, Interoperability, Inspection, Accreditation
§ ICAP strategically aligns with global expert test labs to provide the best level of testing and field evaluation support
§ Legal and operational umbrella for testing & conformity assessment programs
§ Test Suite & Specification Development
§ Self-Validation Suite Development
§ Inspection and Verification
Credibility
§ Only ICAP certifications come with the IEEE Certification mark§ IEEE maintained Certified Product Registry§ IEEE maintained Authorized Laboratories Registry
Standard Develops
Standard Approved
Test Specifications Developed
ProductAvailability and Readiness
Conformity Assessment Program Launch
Certification Program Development TimelineStandard – > Test Specs - > Program Launch
9 months –2 Years
9 months –2 Years 6 months – 1 Year6 months – 1 Year 6 months+6 months+
19
Benefits of Implementing a Conformity Assessment Program
Benefits of conformance test before commercial implementation
– Early identification of non-conformances– Exact functionality of the design/protocol is expressed– Multi-vendor solutions typically show interoperability issues –
helps identify such issues early and discreetly.– New offerings will have bugs – helps to catch them
Reduces the vendor’s cost by eliminating or reducing the need for redundant testing by different end-users
Establishes a baseline for performance expectation
Yields systematic data on interoperability issues – accelerates broad technology platform expansion and innovation
Transparency based on common implementation / Test Authority builds trust throughout the value chain.
20
Perspective of Key Stakeholder: End-User
Sets a performance baseline– The end-user (i.e., utilities, telecom carriers, etc.) knows what
to expect– The manufacturers know what is expected of them
Requiring a Certified Product from a vendor means:– Vendor makes the investment as a qualification cost– Early discovery of problems avoids dealing with unexpected
behaviors during installation and over project lifecycle– Vendor and User save dollars and time in O & M
In the absence of an industry level Conformance Assessment program, an end-used has to establish its own internal one.– Example, PG&E Proof-of-Concept (POC) Facility for
Synchrophasor systems– Significant cost, but helped identify gaps and mature / develop
the industry Guides and Standards
21
ISO/IEC 17025 + competency requirements
Performance/Design Requirements
ISO/IEC 17065 + competency requirements
ISO/IEC 17011 + Competency requirements
Conformity Assessment Certification Scheme – Single Scheme
23
Products
Certification Body(ies)
Accreditor(s)
Scheme OwnerOversight &
Communication
Laboratory(ies)
Scheme Owner harmonizes technical requirements
Courtesy of G.Gillerman @ NIST
14
Programs Under Active DevelopmentIEEE 1588 Telecom (ITU G8265.1) (Launched)
– Standard that enables precise synchronization of clocks in measurement and control systems implemented with technologies such as network communication, local computing and distributed objects
Synchrophasor (IEEE C37.118.1) (Pilot in Progress)– Key components include GPS Satellite synchronized clock, phasor
measurement units (PMUs) & phasor data concentrator (PDC)
SIEPON (IEEE 1904.1) (Pilot starting in Q3)– Service Interoperability in Ethernet Passive Optical Networks
(SIEPON)addresses the need for global passive optical network devices to interoperate – plug & play interoperability
– Target market – passive optical networks, fiber-to-the-home (FTTH)
25
Programs Under Active DevelopmentCamera Phone Image Quality (CPIQ – IEEE P1858)
– This standard defines a standardized suite of objectives and subjective test methods for measuring camera phone image quality attributes , and it specifics tools and test methods to facilitate standards-based communication
– CPIQ CASC Founding Membership open till June 30, 2015
– CASC developing Consumer Rating System and test procedures
IEEE 1547 – Distributed Energy Resources Interconnect– Steering Committee formed– Expert input to test plans/suites, laboratory identification, and
market analysis– Forecast to Launch in 2016
IEEE Nuclear Power Engineering Committee– Certification program for Class 1E devices– Steering Committee formed– Next meeting planned for July 2015
26
Entering Development
IEEE C37.240 – Cybersecurity for substation automation– Stakeholder engagement in progress– F2F meeting planned for May 2015
IEEE C37.118.2 – Synchrophasor Communication Protocol– Steering Committee Forming– F2F meeting planned for May 2015
IEEE 1588 Power (IEEE C37.238)– Standard specifies a common profile for the use of IEEE
1588 Precision Time Protocol (PTP) in power system protection, control, automation, and data communication applications utilizing an Ethernet communications architecture
27
Certification Mark Defined
A certification mark is any word, phrase, symbol or design, or a combination thereof owned by one party who certifies the goods and services of others when they meet certain standards. The owner of the mark exercises control over the use of the mark; however, because the sole purpose of a certification mark is to indicate that certain standards have been met, use of the mark is by others.
29
IEEE Certification Mark
Artwork has been finalized– Customizable for individuals programs by standard number
and/or a short program description, i.e. Telecom, SIEPON, Synchrophasor, etc.
Certification mark is in final stages of trademark process by IEEE Legal
31
• SCASC Chair: Allen Goldstein, NIST• SCASC Vice-Chair: Yi Hu, Quanta Technology• SCASC Secretary: Ravi Subramaniam, IEEE-SA
Synchrophasor Conformity Assessment Program
• October 2015
IEEE Synchrophasor Certification• The certification program is developed to ensure PMUs are tested
for compliance to the following standards:– IEEE Std. C37.118.1-2011 “Synchrophasor measurement”
• Amended by IEEE C37.118.1a
• PMUs certified by IEEE provides:– Utilities and end-users to require certified devices – high level of assurance
the PMUs will work in a larger system
– Manufacturers the opportunity to demonstrate continued compliance to the standard
• IEEE has authorized independent test laboratory to test PMUs– Consumers Energy Laboratory Services (http://laboratoryservices.com)
• NIST has developed mobile calibration procedure for PMU test systems
• For more information or to apply for certification go to standards.ieee.org/icap or e-mail the [email protected].
33
Test Suite Specification
Synchrophasor Measurement Test Suite Specification (for C37.118.1) completed and available for sale:– Via IEEE Xplore: http://bit.ly/1LbGWJA
– Developed by IEEE Synchrophasor Conformity Assessment Steering Committee (SCASC)
– Unambiguous, systematic way of testing PMUs according to IEEE C37.118.1a-2014
34
Benefits
Utilities– Minimize deployment time
and costs
– Deploy with confidence -Use IEEE certified PMUs
Manufacturers– Demonstrate compliance to
IEEE C37.118.1
– Utilize IEEE certification logo
– List your products on IEEE certified products registry
• SCASC Chair: Tom Basso, NREL
• SCASC Secretary: Ravi Subramaniam, IEEE-SA
IEEE1547 ConformityAssessmentProgram
• October 2015
IEEE Std 1547.1a -- Amendment 1 [2015] to 1547.1 New type tests:
…e.g., modulated power output allowed as a function of frequency conditions …
10
3. Response to abnormal frequency conditionsInsert new subclauses (into IEEE Std 1547.1)
3.Real power reduction test where the EUT responds to over frequencyThe manufacturer shall specify the response characteristics of the EUT real power reduction in response to over-frequency events
4.Real power increase test where the EUT responds to under frequencyThe manufacturer shall specify the response characteristics of the EUT real power increase in response to under-frequency events.
IEEE Std 1547.1a (Mar. 2015 -- Amendment 1 to 1547.1) New type test …5.13 Voltage regulation … four categories of voltage regulation testing … each applicable to: static power inverters/converters, induction machines, and synchronous machines.-Where the EUT responds to variations in voltage the manufacturer shall specify the response characteristics.-Where the EUT responds to communicated settings the manufacturer shall specify the protocol, means of communications and the response characteristics.-Where the EUT responds to a time schedule the manufacturer shall specify the response characteristics.-Where the reactive power output of the EUT changes with respect to real power output, the manufacturer shall specify the response characteristics.
11
New ride-thru test 5.3 Real power variation test (over/under frequency)
P1547.1a Annex A. 5 Power variation test (step-wise ramp function) – general
Figure A.6 -- Graphical representation of power variation test -- using step-wise ramp function with n = 4
Micro-Grid / DER Benefits:
Energy/economic security• Renewable generation
sources• Storage technologies • Demand management • Fuel diversity
Increased reliability/resilience• Islanding ability to avoid blackout (UPS)• Digital grade power quality
Improved efficiency• Waste heat recycled forheating/cooling of buildings• Optimized energy consumption• Reduced T&D losses
Distributed Energy Resources (DER) located closer to load centers, configured for both grid-tied and islanded operation, dramatically improves resilience to events.
DER brings resilience to events… along with other benefits
Conformity Assessment Steering Committee –Accelerated Deployment Effort
We need to start a “CASCADE …
Implement a key cross-populated subcommittee structure tasked with answering top priority critical questions and developing goal oriented collaboration from each community:
a. Translate technical/test reqmts into Regulatory impacts (to expose political adoption barriers and resistance points)
b. Translate technical/test reqmts into Financial impacts (to expose economic adoption barriers and resistance points)
c. Develop a Prototype Factory Inspection Process for both Lite and Full versions. Evaluate potential Test Bed sites for Certification Process.
d. Pursue prototypical Pilot implementation(s) that align manufacturers with utilities. [Eg Duke and ABB] for Field Installation Test (system) phase. Include trial certificate issue and data capture.
Contact Information Page
Ravi SubramaniamTechnical Director, ICAP
27
[email protected] [email protected]
standards.ieee.org/icap
Paul HeitmannProgram Manager, IEEE1547.1