incentive stock options may not be all that they …...incentive stock options may not be all that...

14
Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equity is an important compensation tool for employers to create alignment, incentivize performance, build long-term value, and control the cash cost of compensation. There are several types of equity compensation arrangements, each with different economic and tax attributes that can influence how and when they are used. Depending on the situation, some arrangements can favor the employer over the employee, and some the employee over the employer. The tax implications of incentive stock options (ISOs) can vary dramatically depending on how and when an employee exercises and monetizes an award. Once a popular equity compensation arrangement, ISOs have decreased in relative popularity since the early 2000s in favor of restricted stock arrangements and non-statutory stock options (NSOs). However, in today’s market ISOs are increasingly being utilized by venture or private equity-backed private companies. With this rise in use, it is

Upload: others

Post on 18-Feb-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They …...Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equi t y i s a n i mp or t a nt comp ensa t i on t ool f or emp loy er

 

  

IncentiveStockOptionsMayNotBeAllThatTheySeem

Equityisanimportantcompensationtoolforemployerstocreatealignment,incentivizeperformance,buildlong-termvalue,andcontrolthecashcostofcompensation.

Thereareseveraltypesofequitycompensationarrangements,eachwithdifferenteconomicandtaxattributesthatcaninfluencehowandwhentheyareused.Dependingonthesituation,somearrangementscanfavortheemployerovertheemployee,andsometheemployeeovertheemployer.Thetaximplicationsofincentivestockoptions(ISOs)canvarydramaticallydependingonhowandwhenanemployeeexercisesandmonetizesanaward.

Onceapopularequitycompensationarrangement,ISOshavedecreasedinrelativepopularitysincetheearly2000sinfavorofrestrictedstockarrangementsandnon-statutorystockoptions(NSOs).However,intoday’smarketISOsareincreasinglybeingutilizedbyventureorprivateequity-backedprivatecompanies.Withthisriseinuse,itis

Page 2: Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They …...Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equi t y i s a n i mp or t a nt comp ensa t i on t ool f or emp loy er

importanttounderstandthecomplexitiesandissuesfacedbyemployeesexercisingandmonetizingISOsintoday’sacquisition-focusedenvironment.

PotentialBenefitsThetaxtreatmentofanISOistypicallybeneficialtoanemployeerelativetootherequitycompensationarrangements.UnlikeISOs,bothNSOsuponexerciseandrestrictedstockarrangementsuponvestinggenerallycreatetaxablecompensationtotheemployeesubjecttoincometax,socialsecurityandMedicaretaxwithholding.Conversely,withISOsthereisnotaxablecompensationtotheemployeeprovidedthattheemployeeholdsthesharesreceiveduponexerciseforatleasttwoyearsaftergrantandoneyearafterexercise.Employeesmeetingtheaboverequirementsaretaxedatfederallong-termcapitalgainsrates(generally23.8%includingthenetinvestmentincometax)whenthesharesaremonetizedafterbeingheldformorethanoneyear.Duetothisfavorablerate,employeesgenerallypreferISOs.However,severalothercomplexandoftenoverlookedissuescanarisewithrespecttoISOsthatnegatepotentialbenefitstotheemployee.

PotentialDrawbacksOneconsiderationwithrespecttoISOsisthealternativeminimumtax(AMT).ISOscanhavesignificantAMTimplicationsthatareoftenmisunderstood.Whilethe2017taxreformrepealedtheAMTforcorporations,AMTremainsineffectforindividualtaxpayers.WhiletheexerciseofISOsdoesnotgeneratetaxablecompensationforregulartaxpurposes,thespreadbetweenthefairmarketvalueofthestockandtheexercisepriceonthedateofexercisegeneratestaxableincomeforAMTpurposes,potentiallysubjectingtheemployeetoAMTof26%or28%intheyearofexercise.

AsidefromthisrathermechanicalAMTissue,severalcommoncorporateeventscancontributetoalossofthebeneficialtaxtreatmentofISOs.Often,employeesexercisingISOsendupdisposingofthesharesinadisqualifyingdisposition(adispositionlessthantwoyearsfromthegrantdateandlessthanoneyearfromtheexercisedate)becausetheoptionexerciseisdoneinconnectionwiththesaleofthebusiness.Similarly,employeesmayreceiveanoptionterminationpaymentofcashinlieuofexercisingtheoptionaspartofasaletransaction.Inthesescenariostheemployeewillrecognizecompensationincome.Inaddition,anoptionterminationpayment(butnotadisqualifyingdisposition)isalsosubjecttoFICAtaxes.

AnotheroftenmisunderstoodandcomplicatingfactorofISOsistheannual$100,000aggregatevaluelimitation.Underthislimitation,theamountofoptionsthatqualifyasISOsisbasedontheexercisepricetimesthenumberofoptionsthatbecomeexercisableforthefirsttimeinacalendaryear.IftheaggregatevalueofISOsthatfirstbecomeexercisableinanyyearexceeds$100,000,theexcessoptionsaretreatedasNSOs.Thoseemployeesreceivinglargegrants,orgrantsinthemiddletolaterstagesofventureorprivateequityownershipwhensharevaluesmaybehigher,tendtoexceedthislimitationforpartormostoftheISOaward.Furthermore,manyISOawardscontainanearlyexerciseprovisionwhichallowstheemployeetoexercisealltheoptionsatanytimefortaxpurposes,eveniftheoptionsaresubjecttovestingovertimeundertheaward.Whenearlyexerciseprovisionsarepresentstartingatdateofgrant,theoptionsaretreatedasexercisableimmediatelyupongrant,andthe$100,000limitationisappliedatthattimetotheentireaward.ManyemployeesmaynotrealizepartormostoftheISOgrantisimmediatelyclassifiedasanNSO,potentiallyleadingtosurpriseatthetimeofexerciseorwhentheyreceiveaFormW-2attheendoftheyearreportingthetaxableordinaryincome.Alsonote,theaccelerationofvestingmayalsocauseISOstobetreatedasNSOs.

Page 3: Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They …...Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equi t y i s a n i mp or t a nt comp ensa t i on t ool f or emp loy er

BALTIMOREBOSTONCHICAGODALLASDALLASGREENWICH

HARTFORDHOUSTONLONGISLANDLOSANGELESMCLEANMETROPARK

NEWYORKCITYORANGECOUNTYPHILADELPHIASANFRANCISCOSEATTLESILICONVALLEY

WASHINGTON,D.C.WESTPALMBEACH

©AndersenTaxLLC.AllRightsReserved.AndersenTaxLLCistheU.S.memberfirmofAndersenGlobal,anassociationoflegallyseparate,independentmemberfirmslocatedthroughouttheworldprovidingservicesundertheirownnameorthebrand"AndersenTax,""AndersenTax&Legal,"or"Andersen

Legal."AndersenGlobaldoesnotprovideanyservicesandhasnoresponsibilityforanyactionsofthememberfirms,andthememberfirmshavenoresponsibilityforanyactionsofAndersenGlobal.Nowarrantyorrepresentation,expressorimplied,ismadebyAndersenTax,nordoesAndersenTaxacceptanyliabilitywithrespecttotheinformationanddatasetforthherein.Distribution

hereofdoesnotconstitutelegal,tax,accounting,investmentorotherprofessionaladvice.

AndersenTaxLLC.|100FirstStreet,Suite1600,SanFrancisco,CA94105AndersenTax.com|PrivacyPolicy|Terms&Conditions|Disclaimer

 

Earlyexercisefeaturescanbecommon,becauseanemployeemaybeabletomitigateAMTbymakingaSec.83(b)election(forAMTpurposes)whenthevalueofthecompanyiscurrentlylow,butexpectedtogrowquickly,andcanreducethepotentialimpactofadisqualifyingdispositionintheeventofasale.However,aSec.83(b)electioncarriesadditionalrisk,asthereismoreuncertaintyregardingthecompany’sprospectsearlyinitslifecyclewithrespecttotheemployee’scapitalthatisnowatrisk(strikepriceandAMTliabilitypaid),comparedtonocapitalatriskinholdingtheISOuntiltheemployeehasmorevisibilityintothecompany’sfuture.

TheTakeawayIncentivestockoptionsmayseemlikeagreatchoicetoprovideemployeeswithincentivetogrowlong-termvalueandenjoybeneficiallong-termcapitalgainstaxratesupondispositionoftheshares.However,intoday’stransaction-focusedenvironment,employeesholdingISOsoftendonotmeettheholdingperiodrequirements,resultingindisqualifyingdispositionsoroptionterminationpaymentsthatgenerateordinaryincome.Furthermore,theAMTimpactandcomplexitiessuchasthe$100,000annuallimitationcanalsonegatesomeofthetaxbenefitofthesearrangements.Employersmusttaketheseconsiderationsintoaccountgiventhespecificfactualsituationoftheirbusinesswhenevaluatingequitycompensationarrangements.Aftersuchconsiderations,ISOsmayprovetonotbewhatwasintended.

  

Page 4: Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They …...Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equi t y i s a n i mp or t a nt comp ensa t i on t ool f or emp loy er

 

  

ConsiderationsofPrivateEquityFundClawbackLiability

AspreviouslydiscussedinStructuringaCarriedInterest,fundswilloftengrantaninterestinprofitsknownasaca rr iedinteresttoitsgeneralpartner(GP)inordertoincentivizetheGPtomaximizeprofitsoverall.

Theformofcarriedinterestcanvarywidely,butgenerallywillfallintooneoftwostructures:first,itcanbeaccruedonadeal-by-dealbasis;or second,itcanbebasedontheperformanceoftheentirefund.Thisarticlediscusseshowclawbacksworkinthecontextofprivateequitycarriedinterestanddiscussessomewaystoavoidormanageclawbackliability.

HowDoClawbacksWork?Whenafundallowsforacarriedinterest,acommonprovisionintheagreementisforaclawbackfromtheGP.Inessence,iftheGPreceivesadistributionagainstitsaccruedcarriedinterestthatitendsupnotbeingentitledto

Page 5: Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They …...Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equi t y i s a n i mp or t a nt comp ensa t i on t ool f or emp loy er

(oftenforfailingtomeetcertainperformancelevels),theGPmustreturnittothefundsothatitcanbeallocatedbacktothelimitedpartners(LPs).Effectively,itservesasadeficitrestorationobligation(DRO)fortheGPintheeventthatitsbookcapitalaccountisnegative.

Forexample,assumeafundcalculatesa20%carriedinterestbasedonoverallperformance.Inthefirstyear,thefundhasunrealizedgainsof100,andaccruesacarryof20totheGP.TheGPthentakesadistributionofthat20ascash.Inthesecondyear,thefundhasanunrealizedlossof100.Inceptiontodate,thefundhasnoprofit,andthustheGPisentitledtonocarriedinterest.HowevertheGPhasalreadytakenadistributionof20.Ifthefundliquidateswithnofurthergains,aclawbackprovisionprotectstherightsoftheLPstoreceivethatcashback.

TheDecisiontoIncorporateaClawbackThereisnorequirementforapartnershiptohaveaclawbackprovisioninitsagreement.Partnershipallocationsarehoweverrequiredtohavesubstantialeconomiceffect,andonecomponentofthatisa DRO,whichisarequiredobligationbyapartnerinapartnershipagreementtorestoreanydeficit(positiveornegative)balanceintheircapitalaccountwhenthepartnershipliquidates.ADROcanmirroraclawbackprovisionforaGPsinceanypartnerwithanegativebookcapitalaccountuponliquidationwouldberequiredtomakeacontributionatleastequaltothedeficit.ButevenaDROisnotnecessarilyrequiredifapartnershipmeetsanalternativetestforeconomiceffect,suchasaqualifiedincomeoffset.Ultimately,itisuptothefundmanagertodecidehowthefundshouldoperateandwhethertoincorporateaclawbackprovision.IfanLPinvestinginafundwishestoprotectitsinterest,itwouldeitherneedtoconfirmthataclawbackexistsintheagreement,orrequestitpriortosigning.

HowtoManageorAvoidaClawbackLiability

LimitsonDistr ibutions

Atitssimplest,afundcanavoidanypossibilityofaclawback(whetherrequiredbytheagreementorpurelyfromaninvestorrelationsstandpoint)bymakingnodistributionstotheGPuntilitisabsolutelycertaintheGPisentitledtoacarry.Thisisperhapseasiestinadeal-by-dealstructure,wheretheeconomicsofaparticulardeal,andthusthecarriedinterestcalculation,arecertainatitscompletion.Similarly,ahedgefundcalculatingacarriedinterestonaquarterlybasisshouldbeabletodeterminethecarryatthecloseofeachperiod.Butwhereacarryisbasedontheoverallperformanceofthefundsinceinception,itmaynotbepossibletobecertainhowmuchcarriedinteresttheGPisentitledtountilliquidation.

Thissimplecasehowever,isunlikely.EveniftheGPwishestoavoidtakingdistributionsofcarriedinterestuntilthecalculationiscertain,itwillstilllikelyreceiveongoingallocationsoftaxableincomebasedontheaccruedbookcarry.TaxallocationstotheGPcannotsimplybemadeuponliquidationwhenthecarryisdeterminedanddistributedsincetheremaynotbeenoughtaxableincomeduringtheyeartoallocateforthecarryinfull.TheGPwilllikelyreceiveallocationsasincomeisrecognized,meaningthattheGPwilllikelywanttaxdistributions,ifnothingelse.Taxdistributionsarenotapartfromthecarriedinterest;theyare,infact,debitedfromtheGP’scapitalaccount,andreduceanyfuturecarriedinterestdistributions.IftheGPisultimatelyentitledtolesscarrythanthetaxdistributionsitreceivedinceptiontodate,andiftheagreementcontainsaclawbackprovision,theGPwouldberequiredtopaybackitstaxdistributionswhetherornot itreceivesataxbenefitforlossesallocatedinlateryears.

Page 6: Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They …...Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equi t y i s a n i mp or t a nt comp ensa t i on t ool f or emp loy er

Ba lanceCompeting Interests

Sincethereisnorequirementforaclawbackprovision,fundshaveflexibilitytowritetheminwaysthatbalancethecompetinginterestsoftheGPandLPs.WhileLPsmayinsistonaclawback,theGPmaybeabletonegotiateacapontheamount,suchasaclawbackonlyfordistributionsinexcessoftheGP’staxliability.TheGPshouldalsoplanforsomeamountofliquidity,eitheritselforfromitsmembers,justincasethereisaclawback.Ifamanagerfeelsthatoneormorememberswouldbeunabletorecontributeaclawbackobligationtothefund,itmaywishtorequirethatcashisputinescrow,orsimplynotdistributedoutoftheGPuntilaparticularevent.

FundCapita liza tion

TheGPcanalsoavoidormitigateaclawbackthroughafundcapitalization,whichgenerallyoccursnearorafterthetermofthefund.Whileafundiswindingdown,theGPmaydecidetocontinuetomanageitsremaininginvestmentswhichcanbeaccomplishedbycreatinganewfund.Theremainingassetsoftheexistingfundwillbesoldorcontributedtothenewfundalongwithnewbuyercapital.Investorsoftheexistingfundmayhavetheoptiontoselltheirinterestorrollitoverintothenewfundeitheronexistingfundtermsornewfundterms.Newinvestorscan:1)purchaseinterestfromexistinginvestorswhochoosetosellor2)committoadditionalcapitalforadd-onornewinvestments.Meanwhile,theGPgenerallywillberequiredtorolloveritsinterestintheexistingfundtothenewfund.

ThefundcapitalizationdescribedaboveallowsforagreatertimeperiodfortheGPtoearncarryandpotentiallyreduceoreliminatetheclawbackliability.Theclawbackrelatedtotheinvestorsthatcashedoutfromtheexistingfundwillhavesettledwiththenewinvestorcapital.Investorsthatchoosetorolloverintothenewfundmaybewillingtore-setthevaluationoverwhichcarriedinterestdistributionsarepayable,factoringinanyclawbackamount.Fromataxperspective,underthisscenariothereisnotaxgainorlosstoreportattheGPlevel.TheGP’staxbasisintheexistingfundwillbecarriedovertothenewfund,whichshouldbeclosetoitsequityinvestment.TheGPwouldhavereceivedtaxincomeallocationsclosetocarriedinterestdistributioninyear(s)distributedcausinglittletonochangeinbasis.Itisimportanttonotethatafundrecapitalizationoffersmultiplepotentialupsideswithclawbackflexibilitymerelybeingoneofthem.

Timing

Anotherconsiderationisthetimingoftheclawbackliability.Generally,theclawbackliabilityisappliedonceatorneartheendofthefund’stermwhenthereisnoadditionalcarriedinterestexpected.Fortheirownbenefit,however,LPsaremorelikelytorequestinterimclawbacktestdatesfromtheinvestmentperiodthroughtheendofthefundterm.Periodictestingcanhelpmitigateclawbackobligations.Iftestingshowstheremaybeanobligation,thefundcanpreventfuturedistributionstotheGP.Additionally,thefundshouldmaketheclawbackcalculationifthereareonlystragglerinvestmentssincetherewouldbenoadditionalcarriedinterestatthatpoint.Theseinvestmentscoulddelaytheliquidationofthefundorevencausethefundtoextendtheterm,whichcouldcausetensionamongsttheLPs.

TheTakeawayThehandlingoftheclawbackprovision,orlackthereof,andhowtheobligationispaidcanbeasourceofconflictbetweentheLPsandtheGP.Toeasethistension,itisimportantwhenafundiscreatedtodiscussclawbackobligationdetailsandforthepartnershipagreementtoincludeproperprovisions,ifapplicable,thatmeetboththeLPsandGPs’expectations.

Page 7: Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They …...Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equi t y i s a n i mp or t a nt comp ensa t i on t ool f or emp loy er

BALTIMOREBOSTONCHICAGODALLASDALLASGREENWICH

HARTFORDHOUSTONLONGISLANDLOSANGELESMCLEANMETROPARK

NEWYORKCITYORANGECOUNTYPHILADELPHIASANFRANCISCOSEATTLESILICONVALLEY

WASHINGTON,D.C.WESTPALMBEACH

©AndersenTaxLLC.AllRightsReserved.AndersenTaxLLCistheU.S.memberfirmofAndersenGlobal,anassociationoflegallyseparate,independentmemberfirmslocatedthroughouttheworldprovidingservicesundertheirownnameorthebrand"AndersenTax,""AndersenTax&Legal,"or"Andersen

Legal."AndersenGlobaldoesnotprovideanyservicesandhasnoresponsibilityforanyactionsofthememberfirms,andthememberfirmshavenoresponsibilityforanyactionsofAndersenGlobal.Nowarrantyorrepresentation,expressorimplied,ismadebyAndersenTax,nordoesAndersenTaxacceptanyliabilitywithrespecttotheinformationanddatasetforthherein.Distribution

hereofdoesnotconstitutelegal,tax,accounting,investmentorotherprofessionaladvice.

AndersenTaxLLC.|100FirstStreet,Suite1600,SanFrancisco,CA94105AndersenTax.com|PrivacyPolicy|Terms&Conditions|Disclaimer

 

  

Page 8: Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They …...Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equi t y i s a n i mp or t a nt comp ensa t i on t ool f or emp loy er

 

  

TaxReformImpactsonHobby-RelatedDeductions

OneprovisionoftheTaxCutsandJobsActof2017(TCJA)thathasreceivedmuchattentionisthesuspensionofmiscellaneousitemizeddeductionssubjecttothe2%ofadjustedgrossincomelimitationfortaxyearsbeginningin2018.However,whathasnotgarneredmuchattentionisthatthisprovisioncouldcreatehighlyadversetaxconsequencesfortaxpayerswithincome-generatinghobbies.

Undergeneraltaxprincipals,taxpayerswhoareengagedinatradeorbusinessmaydeducttheirordinaryandnecessary

businessexpenseswhencomputingtheirtaxableincome.Ifthereareexcessexpenses,thisnetlosscan,atleasttoa

certainextent,offsetothernon-businessincome.However,thelawdoesnotallowtaxpayerstotreattheirhobbiesas

businessesinordertogetthetaxbenefitofexpensesrelatingtothosehobbies.Infact,underthenewlaw,NONEofa

Page 9: Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They …...Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equi t y i s a n i mp or t a nt comp ensa t i on t ool f or emp loy er

BALTIMOREBOSTONCHICAGODALLASDALLASGREENWICH

HARTFORDHOUSTONLONGISLANDLOSANGELESMCLEANMETROPARK

NEWYORKCITYORANGECOUNTYPHILADELPHIASANFRANCISCOSEATTLESILICONVALLEY

WASHINGTON,D.C.WESTPALMBEACH

 

taxpayer’shobbyexpensesaredeductible.Asageneralrule,thelawfrownsuponactivitiesthatarenotengagedinforprofit

—andtherearerulesIRSusestotrytofindandtaxthoseenterprises.Considerthefollowingfactpatterns:

Taxpayer1hasafarmandraiseshorses.Shelovestorideandapproachesherenterpriseasahobby. Shehasroomtoletafewpeopleboardtheirhorsesinherbarnforafeeandshehasfieldsthatsheallowsotherstomowforhaywhichshesells.Thissmallincometypicallyaround$42,000peryear helpsoffsethercosts.Thisincometypicallytotals$2,000peryear.Becausehercostsinoperatingthefarmaresohigh,shehasneverpaidattentiontoreportingtheincome.

Taxpayer2isindependentlywealthy.Herentssomeretailspaceintownandoperatesabookstoreasasoleproprietorship.Helovesbooks,lovesinteractingwithpeoplewholiketoreadandenjoyscomingtoworkeveryday.Thoughhesellssomebookshisincomenevercoversallthecostsanditneverwill—buthedoesn’tcare.Hereportstheincomeandexpensesonhistaxreturn,showingasmalllossthatsheltersotherincome.

Finally,Taxpayer3and4shareapassionforoldfurniturethattheyfind,refurbishandsell.Theirfriendsappreciatetheirfinecraftsmanshipandoftenaskfortheirhelpwithcertainpieces.Theybothhavejobsandreadilyacknowledgethatthebusinessisfirstandforemostforfun.Sincetheyareconservativewithrespecttotaxmatterstheyhavealwaysroughlylimitedtheirexpensedeductionstotheirincomefromthebusiness.Lastyear,theysold$20,000offurniturethattheypurchasedfor$1,000.However,theircoststorepairandrefurbishthepieceswere$22,000.Theyonlydeducted$19,000,showingnonetincomeandnoloss.

Before2018,alloftheabovetaxpayerscoulddeducttheirexpensesuptotheamountoftheirhobbyincomeandtotheextentthoseexpensesexceeded2%oftheiradjustedgrossincome.Thesedeductionshelpedminimizeanytaxthatneededtobepaidassociatedwiththeincome.UndertheTCJA,theseexpensesarenolongerdeductible.Instead,theynowhavetoreporttheirincomeandareallowedNOdeductionfortheirexpenses.Intheaboveexamples,nowTaxpayer1mustreportandpaytaxonher$2,000ofincome,Taxpayer2mustreportallhisbookincome(althoughhecanhecandeductanycostofbuyingthebookshesells),andTaxpayers3and4mustreport$19,000ofincomeandcandeductnoneoftheirexpenses.

TheTakeawayItisnotuncommonfortaxpayerstooperateenterprisesthatforeverlosemoney.IfthoseenterprisesaredeemedbyIRStobehobbies,thentheresultsdescribedabovewillhappentothesetaxpayersWhilethereareguidelinespublishedbyIRSfordeterminingwhetherataxpayerisrunningahobbyorabusiness,thereisoftenmuchgrayarea.Taxpayerswhohaveapotentialforthisriskshouldconsultwiththeirtaxadvisorsaboutthenatureoftheirriskandwhatcanbedonetomanageormitigatethatriskgoingforward.

  

Page 10: Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They …...Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equi t y i s a n i mp or t a nt comp ensa t i on t ool f or emp loy er

©AndersenTaxLLC.AllRightsReserved.AndersenTaxLLCistheU.S.memberfirmofAndersenGlobal,anassociationoflegallyseparate,independentmemberfirmslocatedthroughouttheworldprovidingservicesundertheirownnameorthebrand"AndersenTax,""AndersenTax&Legal,"or"Andersen

Legal."AndersenGlobaldoesnotprovideanyservicesandhasnoresponsibilityforanyactionsofthememberfirms,andthememberfirmshavenoresponsibilityforanyactionsofAndersenGlobal.Nowarrantyorrepresentation,expressorimplied,ismadebyAndersenTax,nordoesAndersenTaxacceptanyliabilitywithrespecttotheinformationanddatasetforthherein.Distribution

hereofdoesnotconstitutelegal,tax,accounting,investmentorotherprofessionaladvice.

AndersenTaxLLC.|100FirstStreet,Suite1600,SanFrancisco,CA94105AndersenTax.com|PrivacyPolicy|Terms&Conditions|Disclaimer

Page 11: Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They …...Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equi t y i s a n i mp or t a nt comp ensa t i on t ool f or emp loy er

 

  

ExportTaxIncentives:IC-DISC,FDIIorBoth?

PriortotheenactmentoftheTaxCutandJobsAct(TCJA),theInterest-ChargeDomesticInternationalSalesCorporation(IC-DISC)wastheonlyremainingexporttaxincentiveaftertherepealoftheforeignsalescorporationandextraterritorialincomerules.TheTCJAintroducedanewexporttaxincentive,theForeign-DerivedIntangibleIncome(FDII)deduction.

Whetherataxpayercanorshouldutilizeoneorbothoftheexporttaxincentivesisacomplicatedandhighlyfact-specificanalysis.Thisarticleprovidesanoverviewoftheexporttaxincentives,eligibilityrequirementsandtheoverlapbetweenthetwo.

IC-DISCOverview

Page 12: Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They …...Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equi t y i s a n i mp or t a nt comp ensa t i on t ool f or emp loy er

AnIC-DISCisadomesticCcorporationthathasmadeanelectiontobetaxedasanIC-DISC,subjecttoeasilymanagedadministrativerules.IC-DISCsarenotsubjecttofederalincometaxonqualifyingexportincome.Qualifiedexportincomeisincomederivedfromthesaleofqualifiedexportproperty(definedbelow).Instead,theIC-DISC’sshareholdersaresubjecttotaxwhendividendsarepaidordeemedpaidtothem.Iftheshareholdersareultimatelyindividuals,trustsortrustbeneficiaries(i.e.,notaCcorporation),thencorporateleveltaxmaybeavoidedaltogether,andthetaxableincomewouldconsistsolelyofdividendspaidtothoseshareholdersorbeneficiaries.

ForCcorporationshareholders,thisdividendincome(anddoublelayeroftax)canbedeferredbyissuingproducerloansorfactoringforeigntradereceivables.Factoringreceivablesistheprocessofpurchasingaccountreceivablesatadiscountedpriceandlatercollectingthefullamountofthereceivablesataprofit.Inaddition,ifcloselyheld,aCcorporationthatpaysdividendstoitsshareholderscanclaimafederaltaxdeductionforaportionofthosedividendsintheformofacommissiondeductionwhenutilizinganIC-DISCownedbythosesameshareholders.

AcommissionIC-DISCprovidessalesandexportrelatedservicestoarelatedpartysupplierandispaidacommissionforthoseservices.Thecommissionisthehigherof4%ofqualifiedexportgrossreceipts(definedbelow)or50%onthenetincomefromthesaleofexportproperty.Therelatedsuppliercanalsoclaimataxdeductionforthecommissionpaid.Abuy/sellIC-DISCpurchasesexportpropertyforresaleoutsidetheU.S.,resultingin100%ofthenetincomequalifyingforbenefits.

Exportpropertyisqualifiedpropertythatismanufactured,produced,grownorextractedintheU.S.,andisheldintheordinarycourseofbusinessforuse,consumptionanddispositionoutsideoftheU.S.Qualifiedexportreceiptsinclude,butarenotlimitedto,grossreceiptsfrom:

Thesale,exchange,orotherdispositionofexport property;Thelease,licenseorrentalofexportpropertyusedoutsidetheU.S.(includingsoftware);Servicesrelatedtothequalifiedsale,exchange,lease,rental,ordispositionofexportproperty;andEngineeringorarchitecturalservicesforconstructionprojectsoutsidetheU.S.

FDIIOverviewTheFDIIrulesallowCcorporationsadeductionof37.5%ofitsFDII(reducedto21.87%fortaxyearsbeginningafterDec.31,2025)resultinginatopfederaleffectivetaxrate(ETR)of13.125%oneligibleincome(16.41%fortaxyearsbeginningafterDec.31,2025).TheFDIIdeductionfollowsaformulaapproachtodetermineanannualdeemedtangiblereturnequalto10%oftheinvestmentindepreciablefixedassets(QBAI).Theexcessofdeductioneligibleincome(DEI)overthisdeemedtangiblereturnisconsidereddeemedintangibleincome(DII).TheforeignderivedportionofDEIorincomeearnedfromforeignuseoractivityisFDDEI.Theformulaisasfollows:

DEI=GrossincomewithcertainmodificationsFDDEI=DEIderivedfromforeignuseoractivityDII=ExcessofDEIover10%returnonQBAIFDII=(FDDEI/DEI)xDII

Inaddition,thesaleofpropertyforforeignusetonon-U.S.personslocatedoutsidetheU.S.,includingthelease,license,exchange,orotherdispositionoftangibleorintangibleproperty,qualifiesasFDDEI.TheincomefromthefollowingcategoriesofservicesprovidedorusedoutsidetheU.S.areFDDEI:

PropertyServices–locationofproperty

Page 13: Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They …...Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equi t y i s a n i mp or t a nt comp ensa t i on t ool f or emp loy er

ProximateServices–locationofbusinessoremployeesTransportationServices–originanddestination(50%foreignifU.S.iseitherone)GeneralServices–recipientlocation

ToqualifyforFDIIbenefits,taxpayersmustfollowstrictandcomplicatedrulestodocumenttheforeignuseoractivity.PropertysalestoanunrelatedU.S.personortoaforeignpersonforfurthermanufactureintheU.S.donotqualify.Inaddition,servicesprovidedwithrespecttopropertyorpersonslocatedintheU.S.donotqualify.

Transactionswithforeignrelatedpartieshavespecialrules.Propertysalescannotqualifyunlesstheproductisresoldto,orusedinorincorporatedinaproduct,whichisresoldtoaforeignunrelatedpartyandthetaxpayerestablishestothesatisfactionoftheSecretarythatit’sforforeignuse.Further,salestoaforeignrelatedpartyofotherthanpurchasedpropertydonotqualify,unlessthesellerreasonablyexpectsmorethan80%ofrevenueearnedbytherelatedpartyfromuseofthepropertyfromtheunrelatedpartytransactionqualifiesforbenefits.

Generalservicesprovidedtoaforeignrelatedparty,whoisabusinessrecipient,qualifyifnotsubstantiallysimilartoservicesprovidedbytherelatedpartytopersonsintheU.S.AsubstantiallysimilarserviceisdefinedasoneusedbyaforeignrelatedpartytoprovideservicesbytheforeignrelatedpartytoapersonintheU.S.,andeitherabenefitsorpricetestismet.Thebenefittestismetif60%ormoreofthebenefitsprovidedbytheserviceweretopersonslocatedintheU.S.Abenefitmeanstoprovideareasonablyidentifiedincrementofeconomicorcommercialvaluetoacustomerandnotanindirectorremotebenefit.Thepricetestismetif60%ormoreofthepricepaidbyapersonlocatedintheU.S.totheforeignrelatedpartywasattributabletotheU.S.servicesrenderedtotheforeignrelatedparty.

FDIIorIC-DISC?TheFDIIdeductionresultscurrentlyinanETRof13.125%onexportincomeandthenincreasesto16.41%after2025.IftherelatedsupplierisaCcorporation,acommissionIC-DISCusingthe50%ofnetincomemethodresultsina10.5%ETRontheexportincomeafterdeductingthecommission.Abuy/sellIC-DISCresultsinnocorporateleveltax.Whenexportrelateddividendsarepaidtoindividualshareholdersfromeither,theypaythequalifyingdividendrate.

FDIIdocumentationrequirementsforforeignuseoractivityaremorestringenttomeetandmaybehardertoobtainfromcustomers.Asaresult,moretransactionsmayqualifyforIC-DISCbenefitsthantheFDIIdeduction.However,FDIIappliestoabroaderrangeofservicesthantheIC-DISC,whichislimitedtoservicesrelatedtothesaleorleaseofpropertyandengineeringandarchitecturalservicesforprojectslocatedoutsidetheU.S.

WhenacommissionIC-DISCisusedandtransactionsqualifyforbothFDIIandIC-DISCbenefits,ataxpayermayclaimbothonthesametransaction.However,formulaadjustmentsareneededincalculatingtheallowabledeductionunderboth,astheIC-DISCcommissionreducestheFDDEIandtheFDIIdeductionreducestheIC-DISCcommission.Althoughtheresultisareduceddeductionundereachcalculationseparately,thecombineddeductionmaybegreater.

TheTakeawayClearlythisisacomplicatedandhighlyfact-specificanalysisandgreatcaremustbegivenindeterminingwhichprovidesabettertaxbenefit.However,ifacloselyheldCcorporationdeterminesitiseligiblefortheFDIIbenefits,

Page 14: Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They …...Incentive Stock Options May Not Be All That They Seem Equi t y i s a n i mp or t a nt comp ensa t i on t ool f or emp loy er

BALTIMOREBOSTONCHICAGODALLASDALLASGREENWICH

HARTFORDHOUSTONLONGISLANDLOSANGELESMCLEANMETROPARK

NEWYORKCITYORANGECOUNTYPHILADELPHIASANFRANCISCOSEATTLESILICONVALLEY

WASHINGTON,D.C.WESTPALMBEACH

©AndersenTaxLLC.AllRightsReserved.AndersenTaxLLCistheU.S.memberfirmofAndersenGlobal,anassociationoflegallyseparate,independentmemberfirmslocatedthroughouttheworldprovidingservicesundertheirownnameorthebrand"AndersenTax,""AndersenTax&Legal,"or"Andersen

Legal."AndersenGlobaldoesnotprovideanyservicesandhasnoresponsibilityforanyactionsofthememberfirms,andthememberfirmshavenoresponsibilityforanyactionsofAndersenGlobal.Nowarrantyorrepresentation,expressorimplied,ismadebyAndersenTax,nordoesAndersenTaxacceptanyliabilitywithrespecttotheinformationanddatasetforthherein.Distribution

hereofdoesnotconstitutelegal,tax,accounting,investmentorotherprofessionaladvice.

AndersenTaxLLC.|100FirstStreet,Suite1600,SanFrancisco,CA94105AndersenTax.com|PrivacyPolicy|Terms&Conditions|Disclaimer

 

thentheIC-DISCshouldbeaconsiderationaswell.CompaniescurrentlyutilizinganIC-DISCshouldconsideriftheycanbenefitfromtheFDIIdeduction.