interactions between hydrology and...
TRANSCRIPT
Interactions between Hydrology and LCLUC
Alexander Shiklomanov Water Systems Analysis Group, University of New Hampshire
NASA Land-Cover and Land-Use Change Science Team MeetingUniversity of Maryland, College Park, 03/28/2011 : 03/30/2011
Eshleman (UMCES): Exacerbation of flooding in Carpathian Mountains due to deforestation;Fox (EWC); The Expansion of Rubber and its Implications for Water and Carbon Dynamics in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia;Aizen (UI): Diagnosis of changes in alpine water storages and land surface degradation in Pamir mountains and Amu Darya River Basin;Ozdogan (UWM); Investigating the Relationship Between Land Use/Land Cover Change, Hydrologic Cycle, and Climate in Semi-Arid Central AsiaSaatchi (UCLA): Towards an Integrative and Sustainable Science Program for Caspian Sea Environment;Henebry (SDSU): Evaluating the effects of institutional change on regional hydrometeorology: Assessing the vulnerability of the Eurasian semi-arid grain belt;Shiklomanov (UNH): Northern Eurasian Landscapes: Interactions between Humans, Hydrology, Land Cover and Land Use;Tian (AU): Land Use - Ecosystem - Climate Interactions in Monsoon Asia;Lammers (UNH): Role of LCLUC in hydrology of Eurasian pan-Arctic
WATER CYCLE IMPACTS PROJECTS in NASA LCLUC PROGRAMSu
bco
nti
nen
tal
Reg
ion
alLo
cal
Human
Irrigation
Drainage
Land cultivation/use
Forest cutting
Forestation
Reservoirs
Urbanization
Erosion
Mining
Development
LCLUC and Water Cycle interactions and impacts
Examples for this talk: Central Asia – humanEurasian pan-Arctic – climateAnalysis and integration – NEESPI RIMS
Climate
Snow
Glaciers
Lakes/Wetlands
Soil (freeze/thaw,
permafrost)
Erosion
Fires
Vegetation shift
Human or climate can play major role in different regions
Analysis & Integration
•Inefficient irrigation with soil sterilization problem;
Salinization and desertification of lands
•Pollution of surface and ground waters
Some Water and Land Use Issues in Central Asia
Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan ~ 80% of total water resources Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan –75% of total water use;
Extensive and inefficient water usePopulation increase
Syr Darya
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Year
Syr Darya at Kazalinsk
Syr Darya at Kal
Dis
ch
arg
e m
3 /s
Amu Darya
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
Year
Amu Darya at SamanbaiAmu Darya at KerkiLinear (Amu Darya at Kerki)
Dis
ch
arg
e m
3 /s
1973
1999
2009
Discharge variability
Irrigated Area Map of Central AsiaDerived from AVHRR (10km) and SPOT (1km)
UNH Gridded Irrigation Area time-series for Northern Eurasia using Global Irrigated Area Map (1-km resolution derived from remote sensing data) and historical census data from FAO.
Irrigation time-series analysis
Using UNH hydrological model (WBMplus) we evaluated changes in water demand for irrigation over the long-term period
Irrigation water demand in the Syr Daria basin continues to increase
Annual observed air temperature (left) & precipitation (right) variation from CRU 30’ grids and station data
Grids of linear slopes over periods are shown
1940-2002
1950-2002
1960-2002
1940-2002
1950-2002
1960-2002
Courtesy to V. Aizen
Tian Shan mountains, Syr Daria upstream annual discharge variations
Chirchik, DArea=11200 km2
Uchkushoi, DArea=1210 km2
Urmaral, DArea=1120 km2
Bol. Naryn, DArea=5710 km2
Uzunakhmat, DArea=1790 km2
Sokh, DArea=2480 km2
Oigaing, DArea=1010 km2
Talas, DArea=2450 km2
Ugam, DArea=866 km2
Kurshab, DArea=2010 km2
Year Year
M3/S M3/S
Pamir mountains, Amu Daria upstream annual discharge variations
80
120
160
200
240
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Kafirnigan At Tartki, F=9780 km2 Zeravshan At Dupuli, F=10200 km2
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Magiyandar'ya At Sudzhina, F=1100 km2
25
35
45
55
65
75
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Varzob At Dagana, F=1270 km2
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Yakhsu At Karboztonak, F=1440 km2
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Yagnob At Takfon, F=1490 km2
Courtesy to V. Aizen
AVHRR-MODIS era Observed winter precipitation (University of Delaware gridded fields) shows insignificant decreasing tendency over the long-term period (1936-2008)
Ensemble of 8-GCMs projects increase of winter and decrease of annual precipitation
Change in precipitation (%) relative to 1959-1999
Deviations of Annual Air Temperature (left) and Precipitation (right) over 2031-60 from 1959-1999
Deviations of Annual Runoff (left) and Evapotranspiration (right) over 2031-60 from 1959-1999
SRES A1b
WBMPlusSimulations
+35 mm
+5 mm
-30 mm
+10 mm
UKMO
NCAR
ECHAM
8GCMs
+90 mm
+120 mm
+70 mm
+70 mm
Change in Fergana Valley (most populated area in Central Asia ~ 12 mlnpeople) by 2031-2060 relative to 1959-1999 according to different GCMsfor SRES A1b
GCM Model Precipitation Evapotranspiration
Humans have drastically changed hydrology in the region by the decisions they make
Combination of human decisions and changing climate will compound regional impacts
We can track historical changes with ground and remote sensing data but for the future there is large uncertainty.
COLD REGIONS
Shiklomanov A.I., T. J. Bohn, D. P. Lettenmaier, R. B. Lammers, P. Romanov, M. A. Rawlins, J. C. Adam: Chapter 7: Interactions between land cover/use change and hydrology
Annual discharge variabilities for largest Russian rivers flowing to the Arctic Ocean over 1936-2008. Dash lines show linear trend lines over 1936-2008 (blue) and over 1980-2008 (red). (html://R-ArcticNet.sr.unh.edu)
Acceleration of water cycle in the Eurasian pan-Arctic
Annual time series of spatially aggregated river discharge over the 6 largest Russian basins, precipitation, air temperature and aggregated Arctic Ocean sea ice coverage.(Updated from Shiklomanov & Lammers, 2009 ERL )
Basin averaged anomalies in late winter (February–March) SWE (mm mo−1) averaged for the Ob, Yenisei, Lena and all six Eurasian
basins over the period 1980–2007. (Rawlins et al, ERL, 2009).
Variability of mean precipitations over the cold period (November – April)
P=0.0006
“Change-detection” figure (color merge of 1974 Landsat and
1998 RESURS) illustrating disappearing lakes. Disappeared
lakes appear in red.
Disappearing of lakes in Western Siberia
Courtesy Laurence Smith, UCLA
•Examining temporal variability
of ~10,000 West Siberian lakes
and ponds
•Comparing archived Landsat
data from early 1970’s w/
contemporary RESURS and
MODIS data
Why did the lakes disappear?
• Overall reduction in total lake
area since 1970’s, including permanent drainage of 125 large lakes (>40 ha)
● Most interestingly, these suddenly drained lakes are most prevalent along the continuous-discontinuous permafrost boundary, supporting “permafrost breaching” idea proposed by Larry Hinzman
Example of a hydrological anomaly during the summer of 2007 in the Alazeya river basin. Significant flooding at Andrushkino (lower right) resulting from anomalously high summer river discharge (red arrow, upper left) was not the result of basin-wide precipitation (lower left). Subsequent searches for causes yielded drained lakes (upper right).
Pan-Arctic Spring Thaw Trend (SSM/I, 1988-2001)
Timing and trend in the timing of spring thaw derived from SSM/I have elucidated the thaw correspondence with regional anomalies in annual NPP derived from MODIS and AVHRR. Mean annual variability in springtime thaw for Northern Eurasia (above) is on the order of ±7 days, with corresponding impacts to annual productivity of approximately 1% per day.
Spring Thaw Monitored with Microwave Remote Sensing
McDonald, Kimball, et al., 2004
Advance in Thaw Day for Northern Eurasia (SSM/I, 1988-2001)
Diagram of anomalies in the winter river discharge (% of the
normal) over 1978-2005
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Water Release (mm)
Thawing of Transition Layer (cm)
20.1
22.6
21.124.019.0
4.23.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
mm
0
5
10
15
20
25
%
Total Summer Presipitation (mm)
Released Water (mm)
Contribution Released Water (% of precipitation)
Dynamic of water release from ice-rich transition layer
Data by Davydov from Circum Polar Active Layer Monitoring (CALM) Sites in Chersky
The percent of buildings with deformations in some of the cites on permafrost:
Location Population* Buildings withdeformations**, %
Yakutsk 284,000 9
Norilsk 205,000 10
Tiksi 5,600 22
Dikson 600 35
Amderma 500 50
Magadan 99,000 55
Vorkuta 71,000 80
Chita 307,000 60
*Federal Department of Statistics on 01.01.2009 (www.gks.ru)**Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (2001)
25
Calculations made for standard foundation pile with following assumptions:•No active engineering solutions to control ground temp (e.g. thermosiphons)•No snow and vegetation under city buildings •Ground type: sand, loam, clay •Ice content: hi/low for each ground type
26
Decrease of bearing capacity for typical sandy soil from 1965 to 2005
Conclusions
1) Water Cycle across Northern Eurasia is intensifying.2) The intensification is more significant in winter and summer-fall
periods.3) Changes in land cover across cold regions significantly modify
regional hydrological processes.4) Climate change threatens the regional infrastructure built on
permafrost.5) Projected warming under any of the IPCC scenarios will further
enhance the loss of bearing capacity of the ground
New Integrated Mapping and Analysis System for Northern Eurasia (NEESPI RIMS) and regional analysis applications
http://neespi.sr.unh.edu/maps/
6) data interpolation and shading tools;
7) point/station data list with clickable symbols that open station pages in a separate browser window;
8) fold-out section to run the Data Calculator application to perform mathematical and logical functions over gridded or vector datasets;.
NEESPI RIMSRegional Integrated Mapping and Analysis System
1) data search/selection, spatial navigation, metadata link, etc.;
2) coordinate and map data value reader;
3) pixel query tool (i-tool) gets coordinates, country, watershed, and map data value;
4) time series navigation tool;
5) map size and base layer choices;
Deviation of mean July-August air temperature in 2010 from LTM over 1948-2010 (NCEP data)
Deviation of sum of precipitation over July-August 2010 from LTM over 1948-2010 (NCEP data)
Distribution of cropland area
Air Temperature
Precipitation
Croplands
Analysis of hot summer 2010 in Russia
Analysis of air temperature and population in summer 2010Deviation of daily max air temperature over July2-Aug18, 2010 from LTM
Distribution of population density Calculation of area and population in Russia where mean daily air temperature over the period 07-02-2010 to 08-18-2010 was 40C higher then LTM. This heat effected about 90 million people or ~ 60% of total Russian population
Max Air Temperature
Population Density
Anomalies of air temperature and precipitations in summer 2010 from long-term mean over 1985-2010 for Russian cropland area (cropland >10% per grid cell)
Air Temperature
Precipitation
Anomalies of summer 2010 from LTM
Anomalies of summer 2010 from LTM
Anomalies of over 1985-2010
2010 wheat yield in Russia was ~40% less than in 2008, 2009
Carbon monoxide concentrations in the atmosphere between 2 and 8 km above Russia as recorded from 1 to 8 August 2010 by NASA (MOPITT). Ground concentrations of this dangerous gas are reported to be much higher, causing people to report headaches, dizziness, and other more serious conditions.
Using air temperature and precipitation data in NEESPI RIMS we evaluated index of wild fire probability for summer months from 1985 to 2010
1972
2010
2010
Summary
1) Integration of in situ data, remote sensing information and modeling in one on-line system is a fast way to address many interdisciplinary problems;
2) NEESPI RIMS ( Regional Integrated Mapping and Analysis System) contains a set of Web based and online research and data analysis services and tools that can be used for scientific gridded, vector, and point (station) datasets. It is integrated into a hydrological modeling framework that combines data mining, model runs, and data delivery to end users.
3) Rapid analysis of various phenomena and events can be done with NEESPI RIMS using automatically updated near real-time products.
4) Analysis of meteorological characteristics of summer 2010 in Russia shows: a) the summer was extremely warm and dry; b) these conditions impacted most Russian cropland;
c) about 60% of Russian population was affected by this hot weather.5) NEESPI RIMS also allows analysis of a wide range of future scenarios and
models online.