invention
TRANSCRIPT
INVENTION
0 Close reading/ repeated observation
0 Inquiry
0 Stasis questions
0 Journalistic questions
0 Research & reporting
0 Formal analysis
0 Interpretation
0Evaluation
Discovering the available means of persuasion.
Close reading/repeated observation
Look at, examine, engage with the subject (object of criticism)--
multiple times, if possible
Inquiry
0 Investigation beyond the primary source (subject), guided by carefully posed research questions--
0 Stasis
0 Journalistic
0 Theory, interpretative lens
0 Evaluation criteria (discourse community or disciplinary values)
Stasis Questions
0 Possibly--Definition: What should it be called? How should it be categorized? How do we define the act/thing? What kind is it? What are the parts and how are they related. To what class does it belong?
0Definitely--Quality: How serious/important is the act/thing? Is it good or bad (how so)? Is it right or wrong (how so)? Is it honorable or dishonorable (how so)?
Research & Reporting
0 Research
0 Databases
0 Target forum
0 Other forums
0 Reference sources
0 News sources
0 Primary sources: Organization, institution, publisher, author, etc.
0 Course lectures & materials
0Reporting
0 Attend event
0 Interview
Theoretical or Interpretive Lens
0 Biographical0 Historical0 Psychological0 Feminist0 Marxist0 Structural0 Post-structural0 Postmodernist0 Ethical0 Rhetorical0 Others?
Evaluation Criteria
What does the community or discipline value?
What standards of judgment are typically used to decide what is “good”?
Sources
0 Cline, Andrew. A Rhetoric Primer. Rhetorica. 2006. Web. Rhetorica.net
0 Longaker, Mark Garrett and Jeffrey Walker. Rhetorical Analysis. New York: Longman, 2011.