ions in an electrostatic ion beam trap oded heber weizmann institute of science israel physics:...
TRANSCRIPT
Ions in an electrostatic ion beam trap
Oded HeberWeizmann Institute of Science
Israel
Physics:
•Daniel Zajfman•Henrik Pedersen (now at MPI)•Michael Rappaport•Sarah Goldberg •Adi Naaman•Daniel Strasser•Peter Witte (also MPI)•Nissan Altstein•Daniel Savin
Chemistry:
•Yinon Rudich•Irit Sagi
4th LEIF meeting Belfast 2003
• INTRODUCTION: ELETROSTATIC LINEAR TRAP AND LAB
• DYNAMICS OF ION BUNCHES IN THE TRAP
• LONG TIME SYNCRONIZATION MODE
• DIFFUSION MODE
TALK SUBJECTS
Optical resonator Particle resonator
Trapping of fast ion beams using electrostatic field
Photon optics - ion opticsPhoton optics - ion optics
L
M
V V
Ek, q
V>Ek/q
L=407 mm
Entrance mirror
Exit mirror
Field
fre
e r
eg
ion
V1
V4
V2V3
Vz
V1
V4
V2V3
Vz
Field free region
Trapping ion beams at keV energies
• No magnetic fields• No RF fields• No mass limit• Large field free region• Simple to operate• Directionality• External ion source• Easy beam detection
Why is this trap different from the other traps?
Detector (MCP)
Ek
Neutrals
Physics with the electrostatic ion beam trap
• Metastable states• Bi-molecules• Clusters• Photon induced processes• Electron collisions• Beam dynamics• …
Lifetime of the metastable 1S0 state of Xe++
TheoryGarstang: 4.4 msHansen: 4.9 msExperimentsCalamai: 4.6 0.3 msWalch: 4.5 0.3 ms
TheoryGarstang: 4.4 msHansen: 4.9 msExperimentsCalamai: 4.6 0.3 msWalch: 4.5 0.3 ms
Photon count rate
=4.46 0.08 ms 3P1
1S0
=380 nm
Beam lifetime: 4.2 keV, Xe++ .
=310 2 ms.
Since the beam lifetimeis much longer than the1S0 state lifetime, thereare no corrections due to collisions or quenching.
TheoryGarstang: 4.4 msHansen: 4.9 msExperimentsCalamai: 4.6 0.3 msWalch: 4.5 0.3 msPresent: 4.46 0.08 ms
TheoryGarstang: 4.4 msHansen: 4.9 msExperimentsCalamai: 4.6 0.3 msWalch: 4.5 0.3 msPresent: 4.46 0.08 ms
Laser room
Ion sources
Source control
Linear trap
Bent trap
control room
Ek, m, q
W0
Pickup electrode
Wn
Ek=4.2 keV Ar+ (m=40)
T 2Wn
2930 ns
280 ns
(f=340 kHz)
Induced signal on thepickup electrode.
Time evolution of the bunch length
The bunch length increases because:
• Not all the particles have exactly the same velocities (v/v5x10-4).
• Not all the particles travel exactly the same path length per oscillation.
• The Coulomb repulsion force pushes the particles apart.
After 1 ms (~350 oscillations) the packet of ions is as large as the ion trap
2220n ΔTnWW
Time evolution of the bunch width
ΔT: Dispersion coefficient
Harmonic Oscillator
Oscillation time:km2πT
0dvdΤ
0;dΕdΤ
Linear Trap
0dvdT
0dvdT
“Time focusing”,”space focusing ,”“ momentum focusing”
Characteristic time spread as a function of voltage on the last electrode of the trap.
DiffusionSynch.
dT/dv > 0
dT/dv < 0
Dispersion calculated for thereal potential in the 3D ion trap
Is dT/dv>0 a valid conditionin the “real” trap?
Kinematical condition for motionsynchronization: dT/dv > 0
K d
T/d
v
T=15 msT=5 msT=1 ms
T=30 ms T=50 ms T=90 ms
“Synchronization motion”
Expected
Observation:No time dependence!
Shouldn’t the Coulomb repulsionhave spread the particles?What happened to the initialvelocity distribution?
2220n ΔTnWW
Dispersion
No-dispersion
Trajectory simulation for the real system.
Trajectories in the real field of the ion trap
Without Coulomb interaction With Coulomb interaction
E1>E2
Fourier Transform of the Pick-up Signal
.
Resolution: 1.3 kHz, f/f1/300
4.2 keVAr+
f
Non-synchronizing mode: dT/dv < 0
Application to mass spectrometry: Injection of more than one mass
FFT
m<mEk
Characteristic time spread as a function of voltage on the last electrode of the trap.
DiffusionSynch.
dT/dv > 0
dT/dv < 0
Dispersion calculated for thereal potential in the 3D ion trap
Is dT/dv>0 a valid conditionin the “real” trap?
Kinematical condition for motionsynchronization: dT/dv > 0
K d
T/d
v
Delta-kick cooling (focusing in velocity space)S. Chu et al., Opt. Lett. 11, 73 (1986)
Phase space before kick:
x
p
x
p
Phase space after kick:
Condition for delta-kick cooling: A correlation in phase space must exist
Experiments performed on neutral atoms or molecules
F. Crompvoets et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 093004 (2002)E. Marechal et al., Phys. Rev. A, 59, 4636 (1999)
Proposal for charged particles (weakly interacting particles):
Y. Kishimoto et al., Phys. Rev. E, 55, 5948 (1997)
γ
γ
Phase space simulation using 20 ions with equivalent charges of 5 x 105 ions
Phase space correlation builds upvery fast because of the strongCoulomb interaction at the turningpoints (trap mirrors)
dT/dv<0 !!
Delta-kick cooling on strongly interacting particles: Beating the Coulomb force
Ingredients for delta-kick cooling in the trap:
Wave formgeneratorTrigger
Kicker
Bunch motion
1) Dispersive mode: dT/dv<02) Fast build up of phase space correlation3) Small bunches
t
U(t)
U0
2
p0 T
t1UU(t)
Optimumpulse
-Tp Tp
βτ
TγEU
2pk
0 γ: correlation angleEk: beam energy
τ: half transition time through the cooling electrodesβ: Geometrical factor
If the velocity spread is reduced, the bunch size increase should be slower
Bunch size without kick
Bunch size with δ-kick
Apply cooling pulse
How is “cooling” observed?
ΔW
Experiment:5 x 105 Ar+, Ek= 4.2 keVβ ≈ 0.78Tp=0.5 μsγ ≈ 0.01 μs-1
V 168βτ
TγEU
2pk
0
ΔTdEdT
ΔE1
13 eV
10.7 eV
Summery:
Ion bunch motion in the electrostatic trap can be in a synchronization mode when dT/dv>0
Application: high resolution mass spectrometry
When dT/dv<0 the bunch is in an enhanced diffusion mode
Application: delta kick cooling
Ion Motion Synchronization in an Ion-Trap Resonator, •Phys. Rev. Lett., pp. 55001, 87 (2001). •Phys. Rev. A., pp. 42703, 65 (2002).•Phys. Rev. A, pp. 42704, 65 (2002).•Phys. Rev. Lett., pp. 283204, 89 (2002) Delta Kick Cooling•Submitted to Phys. Rev. A