joint meeting of the - muskoka › document › 25553 › presentation c… · joint meeting of the...
TRANSCRIPT
Joint meeting of the Engineering & Public Works Committee (PW-3-2015)
and Corporate & Emergency Services Committee (CES-3-2015)
February 18, 2015
User Fees and Urban Service Area Charges increase for 2015
Capital Budget for 2015
10-Year Capital Forecast
Contributions to Reserves in 2015
10-Year Contribution to Reserves
10-Year Infrastructure Deficit
2
1.4%
$10 M
$137 M
$4.8 M
$57.6M
($43.3M)
Increase in Forecast Reserves after 10 years
External Debt Repayment in 2015
External Debt Reduction Forecasted over 10 years (principal)
Internal Debt Repayment in 2015
Internal Debt Forecasted over 10 years (principal)
-$43 M
+$23 M
$7.8 M
3
$0.5 M
+$28 M
Account Category
2015 Net Levy
Increase/ (Decrease)
Category Yr-over-YrChange %
Net Levy Impact
Total Expenditures $249,001 1.0% 2.3%Total Revenue Sources (88,186) 0.6% (0.8%)Net Levy Impact 160,815 1.5%Assessment Growth (84,012) (0.8%)Net Levy Impact After Growth $76,803 0.7%
1% levy = $105.0 k Net Levy below guideline of 3.5%
5
6Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 17
Water Services 2014 2015
User Fee 52.89$ 54.10$ 2.3% 1.21$ Urban Service Area Charge 13.92$ 14.13$ 1.5% 0.21$
Total 66.81$ 68.23$ 2.1% 1.42$
Wastewater Services 2014 2015
User Fee 53.47$ 54.04$ 1.1% 0.57$ Urban Service Area Charge 33.70$ 33.83$ 0.4% 0.13$
Total 87.17$ 87.87$ 0.8% 0.70$
Combined Water & Wastewater Services 2014 2015
User Fee 106.36$ 108.14$ 1.7% 1.78$ Urban Service Area Charge 47.62$ 47.96$ 0.7% 0.34$
Total 153.98$ 156.10$ 1.4% 2.12$
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease)
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease)
Monthly Impact on Typical Residential Household (20 cubic metres per month & house assessed at $200,000)
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease)
7
In 2014 and proposed for 2015, the increase in monthly charges is less than the construction index which has averaged 2.1% in 2013 and 1.9% in 2014.
Historical Review of Rates & Taxes
8
BMA Municipal Study 2014, pages 369-371
2013 Est. Avg.
Household Income Ranking
2013Est. Avg.
Household Income
2014 Residential
Water/ Wastewater
Costs 200 m3
2014 Water/
Wastewater as a % of
Household Income
2014 Water/
Wastewater Burden Ranking
Gravenhurst Low $71,130 $1,110 1.6% High
Huntsville Mid $85,984 $1,110 1.3% High
Bracebridge Mid $85,045 $1,110 1.3% High Average $93,038 $858 1.0%Median $86,773 $821 1.0%Minimum $55,056 $354 0.3%Maximum $174,855 $1,520 1.8%
Consumption Levels◦ Decline in consumption levels since
2005.
◦ Conservation efforts is one factor.
◦ Weather also has an impact.
◦ 2015 consumption target is 2.75 million cubic metres (down 3.2%).
◦ Consistent with 2013 levels.
◦ Just less than the four-year average.
◦ 84% of the combined rate increase due to consumption drop.
9
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 2
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
Cubi
c M
etre
sYear
Water Billed Consumption by Year
Operating expenses, net of support services, are 0.6% above 2014
Personnel increases = 1% or $49k Purchased Services increases = 4.8% or $80k Finance Charges/Reserves increases = 1.3% or
$168k Net Support Services decreases = 4.7% or $84k
10
11
12
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 10
Personnel increase = $160,011◦ Wage settlement = 2%◦ Shifting labour to water services from wastewater◦ Reclassification and new student = $16k◦ Reallocation of Engineering administration, design and
facilities services = ($44k)
Purchased Services decrease = $58,735◦ Subcontractor costs fluctuate year to year based on
preventative maintenance scheduled
13
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 9
Budget Drivers – Water
Finance Charges and Reserves increase = $74,428◦ Debt repayments decreasing by $77k◦ Reserve contribution increased by $123k to offset drop in
debt repayments plus construction index
Net Service Charges decrease = $24,120◦ Realignment of Engineering administration costs is main
factor
Revenue increase = $69,477◦ User fees increasing $70.7k
14
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 9
Budget Drivers – Water
15
16
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 15
Personnel decrease = $111,306◦ Wage settlement = 2%; overtime increase for Port Carling
WWTP◦ Shifting labour from wastewater services to water = ($116k)◦ Reclassification and new student = $16k◦ Reallocation of Engineering administration, design and
facilities services = ($61k)
Purchased Services increase = $138,470◦ Subcontractor costs fluctuate year to year based on
preventative maintenance scheduled = $53k◦ Biosolids removal costs (haulage) increasing to reflect
actuals = $43k
17
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 14
Budget Drivers – Wastewater
Finance Charges and Reserves increase = $93,088◦ Debt repayments increasing by $193k◦ Tax write-offs increasing to reflect actuals $56k◦ Reserve contribution decreased by $157k to offset drop in
debt repayments less construction index
Net Service Charges decrease = $60,000◦ Recovery for supernatant treatment from Hauled Sewage ◦ Realignment of Engineering administration costs is main
factor
18
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 14
Budget Drivers – Wastewater
19
20
• Total 10-year Draft Capital Budget & Forecast is projecting $31.1 million in gross expenditures (2014 - $34.6)
• The largest source of funding continues to be from the internal reserve funds at $17.3 million (2014 - $23.6)
• Sustainable Infrastructure at $9 million
• Development Charges Revenue:• $2.1 million in 2015• $8.2 million in 2014
• There are no shortfalls in development charges revenue assumed in the 10-year forecast that require financing through internal debt over the next 10 years.
2015 Capital Financing - Water
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 18
21
Land & Site Improvements $5.9Distribution $112.9Treatment $63.9Machinery & Equipment $32.2Total Cost $214.9
Water: 2013 TCA Historical Costs
22
Major Water Projects 2016 – 2019
Project Program BudgetBracebridge
431020 BB James from MacDonald to Ann Replacement - Upgrade 540,000Huntsville
432012 HV WTP Phase III Plant 3,000,000MacTier
432015 MT WTP Modifications Plant 1,900,000Bala
434009 BALA Repair/Paint Tower 2015 Reservoir 800,000Port Carling
434010 PC Repair/Paint Tower Reservoir 800,000Port Severn
432022 PS WTP Rehabilitation Plant 1,000,000Subtotal Expenditures $8,040,000
Remaining Expenditures 6,020,000Total Capital Project Expenditures $14,060,000
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 20
23
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 21
Project Program BudgetBracebridge
431024 BB Spencer from Andrea to Santa's Village Rd Replacement - Upgrade 600,000432039 BB WTP Rehabilitation Plant 2,000,000434016 BB Ecclestone Dr Reservoir & Pumping Station Reservoir 500,000
Gravenhurst432031 GH Filter Underdrains & Scour System Plant 1,500,000434005 GH Repair/Paint Fairview Tower Reservoir 800,000434006 GH Repair/Paint Beach Road Tower Reservoir 800,000
Subtotal Expenditures $6,200,000Remaining Expenditures 8,344,000
Total Capital Project Expenditures $14,544,000
Major Water Projects 2020 – 2024
24
2015 Capital Financing - Wastewater• Total 10-year Draft Capital Budget & Forecast
is projecting $105.7 million in gross expenditures (2014 - $78.9)
• The significant increase is due to the Mountview and Golden Pheasant plants in Huntsville
• Infrastructure Funding Deficit is $43 million which is grant funding necessary to proceed with Huntsville project
• Internal reserve funds are financing $26.3 million from Wastewater capital and Environmental reserves
• Borrowing from Debt Reduction is $19.3 million to finance Huntsville project
• Sustainable infrastructure is $10.1 million
• Development Charges Revenue reduced to $5.6 million ($29.8 million in 2014)
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 23
25
Land & Site Improvements $8.9Collection $124.8Treatment $81.7Machinery & Equipment $52.5Total Cost $267.9
Wastewater: 2013 TCA Historical Costs
26
Major Wastewater Projects 2015
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 24
Project Program BudgetBracebridge
413018 BB Beaumont Dr SPS Pumping Station $1,400,000413101 BB Dill St SPS Upgrades Pumping Station 1,200,000411086 BB Taylor from Toronto to Front Replacements/Upgrade 500,000412020 BB Lagoon Lane STP Headworks Plant 500,000
Subtotal Expenditures $3,600,000
Remaining Expenditures 4,015,000
Total Capital Project Expenditures $7,615,000
27
Major Wastewater Projects 2016 – 2019 Project Program Budget
Bracebridge413018 BB Beaumont Dr SPS Pumping Station $1,200,000413050 BB Sewer & Forcemain Robert Dollar Dr Pumping Station 500,000412020 BB Lagoon Lane STP Headworks Plant 6,500,000412037 BB Lagoon Lane STP Control Building Plant 1,400,000412058 BB Lagoon Lane Sludge Cleaning Repairs and Maintenance - Plant 600,000
Huntsville413105 HV Hodges Lane SPS Upgrade Pumping Station 850,000412061 HV GP STP Alkalinity Control Plant 600,000412066 HV GP Expand/Upgrade to Receive MV Plant 25,000,000412067 HV Forcemain from MV to GP Plant 5,000,000412068 HV MV STP Convert to SPS & Decommission Plant 20,000,000412069 HV GP Upgrade Future Plant 15,000,000
Gravenhurst412063 GH STP Replace Blowers Phase II Plant 500,000412065 GH STP Headworks/Flow Monitoring Plant 500,000
Port Carling411099 PC Forcemain West St SPS to Medora Replacements/Upgrade 800,000
Port Severn412026 PS STP Upgrade Plant 1,000,000
Subtotal Expenditures $79,450,000Remaining Expenditures 7,960,000
Total Capital Project Expenditures $87,410,000
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 25
28
Major Wastewater Projects 2020 – 2024
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 26
Project Program Budget
Huntsville
413077 HV Twin Hodges PS Forcemain Pumping Station 1,500,000
Subtotal Expenditures $1,500,000
Remaining Expenditures 9,240,000
Total Capital Project Expenditures $10,740,000
29
2014 Budget 2015 BudgetWater OperationsWater Capital $2,600,000 $2,723,000Wastewater OperationsWastewater Capital 2,300,000 2,143,000
Total $4,900,000 $4,866,000
Budget ContributionFund
2015 2015 2015 2015 2015Opening Balance Commitments Transfers In Interest Closing Balance
Fund (over-committed)Water Capital $4,299,501 ($2,214,000) $2,723,000 $101,038 $4,909,539Wastewater Capital 4,220,722 (3,475,894) 2,143,000 99,187 2,987,015Environmental 2,234,083 (2,178,068) 2,500,000 52,501 2,608,516Sustainable Infrastructure 1,731,984 (2,400,000) 1,714,739 40,702 1,087,425
Total $12,486,290 ($10,267,962) $9,080,739 $293,428 $11,592,495
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 29
30
BMA Municipal Study 2013, pages 378-379
Muskoka is below comparator group
2012 Water
Reserves
2012 Total Water Own Source Revenues
2012 Closing
Amortization Water
Water Reserves as
% Total Water Own Source Revenues
Water Reserves as % Closing
Amortization Water
Muskoka $4,778,549 $12,259,059 $71,288,720 39.0% 6.7%Average * 70.8% 18.9%Median* 68.7% 16.7%Minimum* 26.8% 6.2%Maximum* 168.2% 44.5%
*Comparison of upper-tier municipalities
31
2019 – 2020 Reserve Fund reaches average of survey
32
BMA Municipal Study 2013, pages 380-381
2012 Wastewater Reserves
2012 Total
Wastewater Own Source Revenues
2012Closing
Amortization Wastewater
Wastewater Reserves as %
Total Water Own Source Revenues
Wastewater Reserves as %
Closing Amortization Wastewater
Muskoka $7,958,234 $13,985,750 $92,646,916 56.9% 8.6%Average * 73.8% 15.0%Median* 67.4% 19.7%Minimum* -40.8% -19.7%Maximum* 208.1% 28.5%
Muskoka is below comparator group
*Comparison of upper-tier municipalities
33
Reserve Fund does not reach survey average over the forecast period
34
(4,000,000)
(2,000,000)
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Development Charge Reserve Fund Forecasted Year-end Balances
Water Development Wastewater Development
35
($20)
($10)
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Debt Reduction Reserve Fund
Balance Internal Loans Issued Transfer In Loan Repayments
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 31
36
$0
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Wastewater - Forecasted Payments
Existing Debt - External Existing Loans - Internal Forecasted Loans - Internal
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 33
Reference: CES-3-2015-1 - Water & Wastewater Treasurer’s Report, page 32
Financial Statements do not consider:o future commitmentso service requirements (current & future)o infrastructure age, obsolescence or conditiono inflation on replacement of infrastructure
Asset Management Plans (AMP) are comprehensive long-term plans for capital assetso AMP’s mandatory in 2014 for Provincial Grantso District’s AMP covers Roads, Bridges, Water and Wastewater assets
37
Asset Type Historical Cost
(millions)
Replacement Cost
(millions)Water $214.9 $484.7
Wastewater $267.9 $613.6
Total Assets in AMP $482.8 $1,098.3
Review of condition and estimated remaining life of assets
Review levels of service
Review replacement cost valuations
Integrate with capital forecast in the budget cycle
AMP indicates revenue sources need to increase:
38
Water: 2.10% - 8.78% per yearWastewater: 2.47% - 9.85% per year
The 2015 Draft Water and Wastewater Budget has been prepared excluding:◦ Amortization: Estimated at $4.8 million and $7.7 million for Water
and Wastewater, respectively; and
◦ Post-employment benefits: nominal
Net deficit with Full Accrual Budgeting:◦ Water is $318,000; and
◦ Wastewater is $2.9 million
Conclusion: contributions to reserves are not sufficient to replace assets at historical values
39
THAT the 2015 Report on Excluded Expenses – Ontario Regulation 284/09 regarding expenses excluded from the 2015 Draft Water and Wastewater Operating Budget and 2015 Draft Water and Wastewater Capital Budget and Forecast, as included in Report No. CES-3-2015-1, BE APPROVED.
40
THAT the 2015 Draft Water and Wastewater Operating Budget and 2015 Draft Water and Wastewater Capital Budget and Forecast as presented in Report No. CES-3-2015-1 BE ADOPTED;
AND THAT the 2015 rate structure for water and wastewater services and miscellaneous charges, as included in Report No. CES-3-2015-1, BE ADOPTED AND BECOME EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 2015.
41
42
Net Levy increase for 2015
Capital Budget for 2015
10-Year Capital Forecast
Contributions to Reserves in 2015
10-Year Contribution to Reserves
44
2.9%
$5.4M
$20M
$1.5M
$27M
Guideline was an increase to levy of 2.95% Proposed net levy increase for 2015 is
2.9% Main factors leading to increase:◦ Waste management contract costs increasing
with inflation at 1.7%◦ Decreased tipping fee revenue and grants
45
Account Category2015 Net
Levy Increase
Department Yr-over-Yr Change %
Net Levy Impact
Total Expenditures $199,306 1.3% 1.8%Total Revenue Sources 118,692 2.9% 1.1%Net Levy Impact 317,998 2.9%Assessment Growth (86,460) (0.8%)Net Levy Impact After Growth $231,538 2.1%
1% levy = $108.0 k Net Levy below guideline of 2.95%
46
47
Category Item $ Total $
Personnel 2% negotiated wage settlement, projected benefit costs and a change in allocation of costs of Engineering Administration and Hauled Sewage. 18,884
Employee Related Expenses Increase in cost of Courses 1,200Materials & Supplies Increase in Operating Supplies, Utilities and Taxes 13,780Purchased Services
Increase in Curbside Pickup for contract inflation and for increase in stop counts. 124,300Increase in Consultant costs for monitoring costs associated with closed landfill sites. 43,700Increase in Subcontractor costs primarily for wood chipping of stockpile at new Rosewarne landfill site. 28,300Decrease in recycling processing fees due to reduced tonnes of recycling material. (40,000)Increase in Net Lift and Dump budget to reflect contract inflation. 30,097
Net reduction in haulage resulting from compactors (29,577)Other miscellaneous adjustments. (43) 156,777
Reference: CES-3-2015-2 Solid Waste Management Treasurer’s Report, pages 4-5
48
Reference: CES-3-2015-2 Solid Waste Management Treasurer’s Report, pages 4-5
Category Item $ Total $
Transfer to Others Eliminate second Blue Box rebate. (30,225)Minor Capital Items
Removal of one-time budget items from 2014 at $50,000with only addition for Remote Bins of $5,000 (45,000)
Finance Charges Increase in Tax Write-offs and other adjustments 20,250Fleet Increased costs of mileage on high-use trucks as well as
increasing heavy equipment repair costs. 28,070Insurance Increase in premiums. 1,800Support Services Change to direct allocation of Engineering Admin and
finance services. 33,770
Subtotal 199,306
49
Reference: CES-3-2015-2 Solid Waste Management Treasurer’s Report, page 5
Category Item $ Total $
Grants Decrease in Municipal Hazardous and Special Waste (MHSW) funding, partially offset by increased E-Waste funding (23,900)
User Fees Decrease in Landfill Tipping Fees to reflect the decline in general waste tonnage. (78,000)Decrease in Clean Shingle Tipping Fees to reflect a single site accepting clean shingles. (17,000)Decrease in Wood Chipping Tipping Fees to reflect 2014 level of activity. (9,000)Increase in Scrap Metal sales revenue to reflect current market prices. 40,000Decrease in Recycling Rebate to reflect reduced volume of material collected. (30,000)Other User Fee revenue. (792) (94,792)
Subtotal (118,692)
The 2015 Draft Capital Budget reflects $5,400,000 in expenditures:◦ second year of development of a new disposal facility at
Rosewarne ($4,500,000), ◦ assessment and first year of remedial work at the closed
Chaffey Landfill Site ($550,000), and◦ compliance and final cover at the Stisted Landfill Site south
portions ($150,000), and land purchase costs ($200,000)
The 2016 – 2024 capital forecast is $14,770,000 and includes:◦ Site expansions, site closures, investment in compactors and
study costs
50
51Reference: CES-3-2015-2 Solid Waste Management Treasurer’s Report, page 7
$0
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
2015 - 2024 Forecasted Capital Expenditures by Category
Collection - Diversion Collection - Waste Processing / Diversion Disposal - Waste
52
Grouping Curbside Non-curbside Disposal/Diversion
Total Cost 4,464,086 1,895,102 4,766,298
Allocation method Serviced units
Direct cost plus
overheadTotal units
Municipality Units Curbside Non-curbside All Units Disposal/
Diversion Total Cost per Unit
# $ $ # $ $ $
Bracebridge 8,250 976,216 217,095 13,135 852,666 2,045,977 155.77
Gravenhurst 7,704 911,608 253,998 12,390 804,304 1,969,910 158.99
Huntsville 10,265 1,214,649 108,564 15,688 1,018,396 2,341,609 149.26
Georgian Bay 2,353 278,429 807,196 8,897 577,554 1,663,179 186.94
Lake of Bays 0 0 264,468 8,013 520,169 784,637 97.92
Muskoka Lakes 9,154 1,083,185 243,780 15,300 993,209 2,320,174 151.65
37,726 4,464,086 1,895,102 73,423 4,766,298 11,125,486 151.53
53
$0.00$20.00$40.00$60.00$80.00
$100.00$120.00$140.00$160.00$180.00$200.00
Waste Management Cost per Unit
Curbside Non-Curbside Disposal & Diversion
54
2014 versus 2015 Levy distribution
Municipality 2014 Levy 2015 Levy Increase/(Decrease) from 2014 Levy
$ % $ % $ %Bracebridge 2,019,225 18.7% 2,045,977 18.4% 26,752 1.3%Gravenhurst 1,905,149 17.6% 1,969,910 17.7% 64,761 3.4%Huntsville 2,274,896 21.0% 2,341,609 21.0% 66,713 2.9%Georgian Bay 1,557,569 14.4% 1,663,179 14.9% 105,610 6.8%Lake of Bays 760,978 7.0% 784,637 7.1% 23,659 3.1%Muskoka Lakes 2,289,671 21.2% 2,320,174 20.9% 30,503 1.3%Total 10,807,488 100.0% 11,125,486 100.0% 317,998 2.9%
Impact to Property Assessed at $200,000
Municipality 2014 2015 Draft
Annual Increase/ (Decrease)
Bracebridge 139.68 140.72 1.04 Gravenhurst 123.60 126.62 3.02 Huntsville 130.12 132.62 2.50 Georgian Bay 123.92 131.20 7.28 Lake of Bays 55.96 57.36 1.40 Muskoka Lakes 53.12 53.38 0.26
55
Bracebridge increase = $26.7k◦ Curb stop decrease offset partially by inflation ($6k)◦ Remote bin/depot increased $3k◦ Transfer station residential cost increase $11k◦ Disposal/diversion increase $19k as proportion of
serviced units remained unchanged at 17.9%
Gravenhurst increase = $64.8k◦ Curb stop increase plus inflation $44k◦ Remote bin/depot increased $12k◦ Transfer station residential cost unchanged◦ Disposal/diversion increased $8k as proportion of
serviced units decreased by 0.2% to 16.9%
56
Huntsville increase = $66.7k◦ Curb stop unchanged plus inflation $34k◦ Remote bin/depot increased $4k◦ Transfer station residential cost unchanged◦ Disposal/diversion increase $28k as proportion of
serviced units increased by 0.2% to 21.4%
Georgian Bay increase = $105.6k◦ Curb stop increase plus inflation $58k◦ Remote bin/depot increased $33k◦ Transfer station residential cost down slightly ($2k)◦ Disposal/diversion increased $17k as proportion of
serviced units increased by 0.1% to 12.1%
57
Lake of Bays increase = $23.7k◦ Transfer station residential cost increase $13.4k◦ Disposal/diversion increase $10.3k as proportion of
serviced units remained unchanged at 10.9%
Muskoka Lakes increase = $30.5k◦ Curb stop decrease partially offset by inflation $13k◦ Remote bin/depot increased $1.6k◦ Transfer station residential cost decreased ($1.4k)◦ Disposal/diversion increased $17.3k as proportion of
serviced units decreased 0.1% to 20.2%
58
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
Bracebridge Gravenhurst Huntsville Georgian Bay Lake of Bays MuskokaLakes
Share of Waste Management Levy
2014 Levy % 2015 Levy %
59
$0.00
$20.00
$40.00
$60.00
$80.00
$100.00
$120.00
$140.00
$160.00
Bracebridge Gravenhurst Huntsville GeorgianBay
Lake ofBays
MuskokaLakes
Waste Management Levy on $200,000 Property
Curbside Non-Curbside Disposal & Diversion
The 2015 Draft Solid Waste Management Budget has been prepared excluding:◦ Amortization: estimated at $3.3 million; and
◦ Future landfill closure & post closure costs not recognized: estimated at $1.4 million
Net deficit with Full Accrual Budgeting is $2.9 million
Contributions to areas for landfills assumed in 1996 is $1.3 million and will be added to contributions in 2016
60
THAT the 2015 Report on Excluded Expenses –Ontario Regulation 284/09 regarding expenses excluded from the 2015 Draft Solid Waste Management Operating Budget and Capital Budget, as included in Report No. CES-3-2015-2,BE APPROVED.
61
THAT the 2015 Draft Solid Waste Management Operating Budget and 2015 Draft Solid Waste Management Capital Budget and Forecast as presented in Report No. CES-3-2015-2 BE ADOPTED;
AND THAT the 2015 rate structure for solid waste management services and miscellaneous charges as outlined in Report No. CES-3-2015-2 BE ADOPTED AND BECOME EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 2015.
62
63