jyrie lossenko sverd 091007

26
www.e-ope.ee www.e-ope.ee National cooperation model for e-learning Estonian e-Learning Development Centre Jüri Lõssenko October 07, 2009

Upload: ulfsan

Post on 03-Nov-2014

9 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Sverd Höstkonferens Innovation , kreativitet och e-lärande Stockholm 2009

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1. National cooperation model for e-learning Estonian e-Learning Development Centre Jri LssenkoOctober 07, 2009

2. Tiger Leap Foundation 1997-2000

  • Initiated 21.02.1996
  • Foundation formed in 1997
  • 14 000 000 USD
  • IT infrastructure and broadband
  • Basic computer skills

3. Tiger Leap Foundation 2001-2005

  • Continuous teacher training
  • Development of infrastructure
  • Networking
  • Support of small-scale projects at school level

4. Situation in 2006

  • Basic and secondary education:
    • 10900 teachers have received basic computer training, 2600 enhanced training (out of 17000)
    • 172 individual projects supported at school level
    • 1 computer per 15-20 pupils
    • 100% of schools have access to broadband

5. E-learning until 2003

  • Uncorrelated projects,
    • At random platforms
    • Often not integrated into regular curricul a
    • Often endingupon end ofcooperation grant s
  • Mostly motivated by teachers personal interest and curiosity
    • not motivated by institutional policy
  • Overall usage of e -l earning (with compulsory elements in web) is small
  • Therewereno governmental e-learning initiatives in Estonia

6. ICT usage levels

  • Presence of IT infrastructure and basic services
  • Broad pedagogical use of ICT
  • Infrastructure is a premise
    • strategic choices of the institutions are most essential
  • Use of ICT for strategic development of the educational institutions

7.

  • Estonian e-University consortium
    • 21.02.2003
    • 7+2
    • Ca 59 000 students (95%)
  • Estonian e-Vet consortium
    • 16.02.2005
    • 26+9+2
    • Ca 29 000 students (68%)

8. 9. Photograph by Johhannes Psuke( 1912 ) Copyright Estonian National Museum 10.

  • botha reconsortium type cooperation bod iesbetweena)Estonian universitiesandb)vocational school s and applied universitiesfor implementing e-Learning
  • Initial creation of both consortia were bottom-up processes (from teaching staff level)
  • Funded by the state, EU and (to lesser extent) institutional level

11.

  • do notguide strategic use of ICT
    • Institutionsare too big and autonomous
    • However , changes of organisational logic and business models come to HEE due to changes in society, incl.g lobalisation effects
  • doessupport capacity building to be ready to implement full range of ICT strategic possibilities
    • Mostly that means orientation to the teaching staff level
    • No implication to educational approaches (instructional vs. constructivist)
    • No implication whether using full or mixed mode e-learning

12. Framework benefits

  • Cooperation in developing and popularising e-learning in Estonia
  • Common portal for e-learning (course database and LOR, support materials for students, teachers and tutors)
  • Common VLE(s)
  • Cooperation in international projects
  • Cooperation in promoting regional study opportunities

13. Framework benefits

  • Promotes quality of education and lifelong learning
    • best courses accessible to everybody,
    • more opportunities for interdisciplinary programmes
  • Wider, more flexible and better-quality learning opportunities for students
    • clear and more open system for exchanging studies

14. Framework benefits

  • Better information about learning opportunities
    • common database and search engine for e-courses
  • More reasonable use of resources
    • common investments to environment, portal, technical support
    • time of students and teachers
    • centralinvestment to e- course development
  • Supports regional development
    • with the help of regional study centres

15. Framework benefits

  • Gives better chances for cooperation and competition
    • One partner for enterprises (single gate to e-learning)
    • easier and coordinated cooperation in international projects and organisations
    • better opportunity to participate in global educational market

16. Financing in 2008

  • ESF and EC funding - 79 %
  • Governmentfunding - 17 %
  • Annual consorti amembership fee s - 4 %

17. Staff training and support

  • 3-level training programme
    • Basic (3 courses)
    • Intermediate (17 courses)
    • Advanced (4 courses)
  • Competences of educational technology
  • Educational technologists and e-learning support staff

18. Teachers trained 19. E-learning content development

  • Coordination and financial support
  • Mostly blended courses to supplement face to face sessions
  • Multimedia centres
  • Materials detached from the courses and available in LOR

20. E-courses 21. E-students 22.

  • Quality
    • E-learning quality label
    • Manual for quality e-course development
  • Internationalisation
    • EDEN, EADTU, EFQUEL, EIfEL, CC
    • EC projects

23. Infrastructure

  • Virtual learning environments
    • Blackboard Vista
    • Moodle
    • IVA
  • Integration of systems
    • LOR and course database
    • Integration between VLEs and SISs
    • Multipoint videoconferencing and recording

24. 25. Promotion

  • Thematic networks
  • Seminars and conferences
  • E-learning newsletter

26. Thank you!

  • http://www.e-ope.ee
  • http://www.tiigrihype.ee
  • [email_address]