king county flood control district executive · pdf fileking county flood control district...
TRANSCRIPT
tQKing Cont
King County1200 King County
Courthouse516 Third AvenueSeatte, WA 98104
Meeting Agenda
King County Flood Control DistrictExecutive Committee
Boardmembers: Reagan Dunn, Chair; Larry Gossett, Vice Chair; Kathy LambertJulia Patterson
3:00 PM Monday, November 1, 2010 SW Conference Room
f~'5
i.~ 3.
A..io 4.
21 "i~ 5.
2.(ø 6.
i.1,1b 8.
2q,~\ 9.
SPECIAL MEETING
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
Approval of Minutes of October ii, 2010
Items for Action by Executive Committee
Approval of invoices
Subregional Opportunity Fund revisions to 2010 projects
Subregional Opportunity Fund attachment for 2011 Budget
7. Proposed amendments to 2011 budget resolution
Discussion of possible issues for the 2011 legislative agenda
Grant alerts
Manager Reports
10. Adiournment
King County Page 1 Printed on 101281010 i
tQKi CoKing County 1200 King County
Courthouse516 Third AvenueSeattle, WA 98104
Meeting Minutes - FinalKing County Flood Control District
Executive CommitteeBoardmembers: Reagan Dunn, Chair; Larry Gossett, Vice
Chair; Kathy Lambert,Julia Patterson
11:00 AM Monday, October 11, 2010
SPECIAL MEETINGREVISED AGENDA
draft minutes
SW Conference Room
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 11: 12 a. m.
2. Roll Call
Boardmembers Phillps and Drago were also in attendance.Present: 4 - Mr. Gossett, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Dunn and Ms. Patterson
3. Approval of Minutes of September 20. 2010
The chair indicated that the minutes as presented would be approved. DSeeing noobjection, the minutes were approved.
Items for Final Action by Executive Committee
4. Approval of invoices
Kjris Lund, executive director reported on the invoices as presented in the packet: Waterand Land Resources Division (WLRD) (operating, $427.365.83; capital, $828,994.58);Inslee Best ($4,550.00; tax suppression, $3,204.00); Gordon Thomas Honeywell($4,740.00); Francis and Co. (July, $2,158.45; August, $3,870.50); County Council($2,518.58).Rick Bautista, Board staff reported on the Lund Consulting invoices ($19,597.50, directexpenses $213.63).
Boardmember Gossett moved to approve the invoices as presented. The motion passedunanimously.
King County2
Page 1
King County Flood Control DistrictExecutive Committee
Meeting Minutes - Final October 11, 2010
Items for Recommendation to the Board of Supervisors
5. Resolution authorizina chair of the District to enter into levyaareements for 2011 (tax supression)
The chair gave an overview of the tax suppression and tax payment issue.
Ms. Lund briefed the commitee on the proposed resolution, including the latest numberson taxing districts over the statutory limits provided by the County Assessor. She alsoprovided a timeline for possible actions by the District, the junior taxing districts and thecounty.
Rod Kaseguma, legal counsel, answered questions and briefed the commitee on theproposed agreement.
Pat Hamacher, Board staff answered questions of the commitee.
Rob Gala, Cit of Seatte, answered questions of the commitee.Peggy Papsdorf Suburban Cities Association, answered questions of the committee.Joyce Nichols, City of Bellevue, answered questions of the commitee.
Boardmember Gossett moved to send to the Board without recommendation theproposed resolution and the attached levy agreement. The motion passed unanimously.
Briefing
6. Levee Veaetation Proposal
Mark Isaacson, division director, WLRD, briefed the committee on the proposal by theArmy Corps of Engineers for a delay in the levee vegetation management policy. Thisdelay would allow more time for King County to find altematives to the Corps' currnt
vegetation policy which requires tree removal. He asked for the committee to send aletter to the Corps in support of the proposal for delay. After review of the draft letter, thechair of the District agreed to send the letter on behalf of the District.
7. Adiournment
The meeting was adjoumed at 11:51 a.m.
Approved th day of
Clerk's Signature
King County Page 23
I KING COUNTY. FLOOD CONTROLDISTRI CT
51611iird Avenue. Room \V 1039. Seatde. \VA 93104
206.296. i 020 . info0jkingcountyflooclcontrol.orgW'\V\ v: kingcou ntyfloodcoiitrol.org
November 1, 2010
Invoice Summary
(p
Firm Service Period Invoice # Amount
WLRD Operating September October 13, 2010 385,224.02
WLRD Capital September October 13, 2010 1,896,263.16
Cocker Fennessy September 297-35 3l347.50
1- Lund Consulting October 2010-11 16,867.50
14-Inslee Best May 164638 5,638.32
If, Inslee Best September 168419 2,625.80
ic Inslee Best Tax Suppression September 168420 12,213.00
l~s
'5
1..q.i
\~-
IS.
11..
4
Board of Supervsors:Julia Patterson, Chair. Reagan DUIln, více Chair
Jan Drago. Bob Fergi.son . Larry Gossett. Jane Hague. Kathy Lambert. Larry Philips. Petc "on ReìchbauerExecuti"e Director: Kjristine Lund
Lt
Summ
ary FCD
Biling for Septem
ber 2010 - Operating
% of 2010 Y
TD
Current
2010 Year-T
o-E
xpenditures2010 A
dopted2009 Contract
Month's
Date
vs.2010D
escriptionB
udgetC
arryoversE
xpendituresE
xpend ituresB
udl:etN
otes
AN
NU
AL M
AIN
TE
NA
NC
E, F
AC
ILITY
AS
SE
SS
ME
NT
S1,369,367.00
-145,796.21
881,463.8064.4%
( 1 )
FLD
HA
ZR
D PL
AN
NIN
G. G
RA
NT
S, OU
TR
EA
CH
472,658.0074,046.00
22,512.16237,706.64
43.5%
FLD
HA
ZR
D ST
UD
IES, M
APS, T
EC
HN
ICA
L SE
RV
ICE
S1,242,337
547,9339,967.91
243,321.3613.6%
FLO
OD
PR
EP
AR
AT
ION
, FLO
OD
WA
RN
ING
CE
NT
ER
, PO
ST
FLO
OD
AC
TIV
ITI E
S337,043.00
6,187.003,007.13
129,281.5437.7%
PR
OG
RA
M M
AN
AG
EM
EN
T, S
UP
ER
VIS
ION
, FIN
AN
CE
, BU
DG
ET
,O
VE
RH
EA
D I C
EN
TR
AL C
OS
TS
2,045,114.00-
134,006.051,622,512.67
79.3%
PR
OG
RA
M IM
PLE
ME
NT
AT
ION
1,660,3546,928.00
65,481.32553,069.13
33.2%
- Green R
iver I How
ard Hansen D
am (P
roject FLD
105)-
--
263,110.64T
RA
NS
FE
RS
AN
D C
HA
RG
ES
TO
CA
PIT
AL A
ND
OT
HE
RP
RO
JEC
TS
, LOA
N O
UT
RE
CO
VE
RY
(627,352.60\-
4,453.24259,858.53
-41.4%
TO
TA
LS:
6,499,520.00635,094.00
385,224.024,190,324.31
58.7%
( 1 ) Future C
omm
itment: $160,000 to be paid to C
ity ofTukw
ila for levee tree removaL.
iI õ1 õ1 õ1 õ1 iI iI iI iI il iI iIÇ(
r r r r i r r r r r i0 (J ~ (0 00 -. .i w N .. 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0"V0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...2.el0-
-l 0 (J en :s ~ G) 0 ~ -l r C (J0 0 ~ C 0 :i ;: m 0 0 "1 ~~ c OJ Z -l m ~ G) r ~ -0Z =1
;: :: m z -l m m :;r -l m m z :: :; :: ;; 0-( r
G) 0 :: G).c :sm ;; :: :: en (J
~ -0 0 ~ c: ~ ;; m z z (J0 :: Z Z m m m ~ :: 0 0 :i): G) :: m 0 -m 0 r - ;U :: ;; 0 c s:Co ~ cm 0 ): ): ): r0 "' i r r-I "' Z s: ~ m ~(J -I. :;
;¡.0 m m m ;;;; z ;; el;; e: ..-I ): .cc z .c mz 0 m m ;;=i m :: :: (J-(
., m~~ En En
)(En '"co ~ -E -E oi .i En .. elCD (. En 01 01 N co 01 W En ::!S .. J' .01 0 ~ .0) N ..i p .. a.N .. N co W .. 0 01 N 0 0 ::Ø) -E (. co 0 w .. N -E 0 01 .. -. c~ p m (. 0 w 00 (J 0 -. 01 w 00 a-i 0 N 0 m m 00 (J 0 co m N w tAØ) 0 01 0 -. N .. .. 0 co co 00 .i
6
enc33Il~'ToC~:i
CQ
õ'..enel"Sel3c-el..No~on"V
401 SECONO AVE. S. SUITE 501 SEATTLE WA 98104.3804OFFICE 2.06.652..9506 FAX 2.06.652..8305
WWW.COFEN.COM
September 30, 2010 Invoice No. 297-35
TO: Ms. Kjristine LundLund Consulting411 University Street, Suite 1200Seattle, Washington 98101
RE: INVOICEKing County Flood Control DistrictSeptember 1 to 30, 2010
Cocker Fennessy provided the following communications/public affairs servicesto the King County Flood Control District during this period. Activities aredetailed below.
Services. Coordinate with WLRD regarding 50 years of flood warning services news event
program and logistics, develop key messages and speaking points, staff event andcoordinate reporter follow-up requests
. Coordinate media inquiries including Green River sandbag inspection and
maintenance. Review/revise media releases, flood brochure and script
. Develop questions for tax suppression F AQ
. Maintain project website and database
. Coordinate and respond to constituent inquiries and comments
. Participate in Executive Committee meeting and project-related meetings and
calls with the Executive Director
StaffFaucettV. LundCody
LevelPrincipalSenior AssociateAssociate
Hours14.00
1.004.25
Rate$195.00$150.00$110.00
Amount$2,730.00$ 150.00
$ 467.50
Subtotal: $3,347.50
TOTAL AMOUNT FOR THIS INVOICE: $3,347.50
Thank you!Cocker Fennessy is a Washington corporation.Federal Tax Identification: 91-162334
7
KC Flood
Sept 1 - 30,2010
Date Personnel Description Hours
09/01/2010 Faucett, Kris GRV mailing coordination. 0.50
09/07/2010 Cody, Sarah Update website 0.25
09/07/2010 Faucett, KrisReview Adv Comm recs. E-maillresponses with 0.75Kjris re: property tax suppression, web updates, etc.
09/07/2010 Lund, VanessaReview emails re: website changes and research 0.25costs.
09/09/2010 Cody, Sarah Update website 0.50
09/09/2010 Faucett, Kris Call with Kjris. Develop FAQs re:suppression. 0.75
09/13/2010 Cody, Sarah Website updates 0.50
09/13/2010 Lund, Vanessa Website advice 0.25
09/14/2010 Cody, Sarah Website updates 0.50
09/14/2010 Faucett, KrisReview Corps levee vegetation information. Call 0.75with Kjris.
09/15/2010 Faucett, Kris Review flood script. Comments to Saffa. 0.25
Call with Logan re: 50 years flood warning services,09/16/2010 Faucett, Kris Oct. 5 event, get ready brochure, resolution. Update 1.00
Angela and Kjris.
09/17/2010 Cody, Sarah Update website 0.50
KOMO reporter calls regarding Green River09/17/2010 Faucett, Kris inspection & maintenance of sandbags. 1.00
Coordination regarding resolution.
09/17/2010 Lund, Vanessa Website assist 0.25
09/20/2010 Cody, Sarahupdate website; troubleshooting WinSCP to upload 1.25PDFs
Review materials; attend Executive Committee
09/20/2010 Faucett, Krismeeting. Coordinating calls regarding Oct. 5 media 3.75event and 50 year flood services resolution.Coordinate media interview with KOMO.
09/21/2010 Faucett, KrisReview/revisions to Flood Brochure. Follow-up to 0.50KOMO interview.
09/22/2010 Cody, Sarah Update website 0.50
09/22/2010 Faucett, KrisReview/revisions to horse logging media release. 0.75Calls re: GR sandbag repair.
09/24/2010 Lund, Vanessa Correspondence 0.25
09/27/2010 Cody, Sarah Update website 0.25
09/27/2010 Faucett, KrisReview/comment on outlne/key messages for Oct. 0.755 event. E-mail inviting board members.
09/28/2010 Faucett, KrisCalls with WLRD re: oct 5 event. Outline event and 1.25develop key messages.
Develop speaking points for Patterson for Oct. 509/29/2010 Faucett, Kris event. Calls with Emiko and Doug regarding event. 2.00
Coordinate with Patterson's offce/WLRD re: video.
Total 19.25
8
LUN)CONSULTiNG
INVOICE: KCFCD 2010-11
October 25, 2010
Reagan Dunn, ChairmanKing County Flood Control District Executive Committee1200 King County Courthouse516 Third AvenueSeattle, WA 98104
King County Flood Control Executive Director Services
Approved funding for 2010:Billed this invoice:Total biled to date:
Contract Balance:
$247,500.0020,215.00
215,345.5332,154.47
100%
87%13%
(Tax Suppression hours to date, August 1 - October 25: 147.50 = $28.162.50)
Invoice period: October 8 - 25,2010
Key Activities:· Tax Suppression & 2011 Budget
· Vegetation management policy interagency work group· State audit· Staff Executive Committee and Board
Professional Services:
Kjristine Lund, Principal, 86.5 hours ~ $195.00Tax Suppression (70 hours)Executive Director Services (16.5)
16,867.50
Acting as agent for: Cocker Fennessy, September services,3,347.50
Total Amount Due: $20.215.00
Lund Consulting; lnc.411 University Street. Suite 1200 Seattle, WA 98101
2064424254 2064670212W\tIJ. lU ndconsulting.com
9
Time Sheet Kjristine Lund
II Hours II Date II ActivityPrep for Executive Committee and Full Board
G10/08/2010meeting regarding levy suppression. Coordinationon letter from City of Seattle. Updates fromassessor and OFM on budget impacts.
Review new assessor information regarding tax G10/10/2010 suppression. Coordinate with team via email overthe weekend, Sunday morning.
Staff Executive Committee and Board of Supervisormeeting. Provide information in response to mediarequest. Coordinate with City of Seattle staff on
10/11/2010 equity and Seawall issues. Attend briefings with 8.00
board members. Coordination with legal team onagreement modifications. Staff condemnationmatter and prepare staff report.
Work on tax suppression. Scheduling briefings tofire districts. Respond to public inquiries mostly
10/12/2010vendors. Respond to City of Snoqualmie. 6.00Coordinate with legal counsel on assessor and DORreviews. Feedback from fire district attorneys.Respond to Si View parks inquiry.
Attend fall City fire district meeting and present
G10/12/2010about tax suppression. Make request. Respond toquestions. Follow-up about budget and tax payerimpacts.
Coordinate with state auditor on inquiries for
G10/13/2010information. Coordination on levee vegetationletter and progress. Coordination on op-ed text.Review e-newsletter text.
Coordination with Exec office on levy agreement.
G10/14/2010Coordinate with OFM on projections. Coordinatewith assessor staff on questions from districts.Coordinate with fire districts.
10/14/2010Teleconference with Seattle on Seawall Ginformation.
Lund Invoice October 25, 2010
10
2
i Date .... ....--...II.A~ti~i1:y--......._...... . .. . .......-.----.......--...-- _...............__.__.......'1 r" _..............._,Hours i
Follow-up on Green River cities request for state
G10/15/2010 funding and potential conflicts with policy directionon levee strategy. Follow-up on paperwork relatedto district administration.
Calls to fire districts and staff to determine statusand to elicit information on next steps. Follow-up
10/18/2010 calls to legal team and assessor staff on questions.6.00Follow-up and research regarding Maple Valley
questions. Public disclosure request. Coordinationwith Horace on data.
Meet with East Renton fire district FD #25. Updatebriefing materials. Coordinate with legal team.
10/19/2010 Follow-up on final edits from legal team including8.00DOR review. Work with Rod to clarify information
regarding intent. Review 2011 budget options andprocedures for final resolution.
Meet with City of Seattle staff on seawalL.Coordination regarding City of Bellevue letter ontax suppression. Coordination with state auditor on
10/20/2010 exit interview and required correspondence. Op-ed6.00review. Reschedule and plan Executive Committee
meeting as well as need for next board meeting.Track progress on agreements by county anddistricts.
meet with WLRD staff on 2011 budget, City ofBellevue request, construction status,vegetation management pilot, opportunity fund2011 list, public hearing preparations, flood planstatus, policy regarding business relocations,
10/21/2010 legislation to use WSOOT signs for flood 12.00warning. Present, attend, and follow-up with
Maple Valley Fire District. Assemble publicdisclosure information for Maple ValleyCommissioner. Clarify issue with interestpayments request by Maple Valley.
Lund Invoice October 25,2010 3
11
,-----.-. -- - ---.--...- - _.._--....-11-. --_.------_.-----------------.--.--------.---...._..-.- ----..--...-_...---- .--.-....-----.i Date Activity.. '- - ._.1 r'--" ...-------.....---,Hours I,
Calls with attorneys and fire districts regardingstatus and next steps. Citizen inquiry regardingFEMA maps. Distribute levy agreement to
10/22/2010 districts. Review and respond to inquiries 6.00regarding article on levy suppression and City ofBellevue letter. Coordination on response and onop-ed.
Attend Fire District #38 commission meeting atWilderness Rim. Follow-up with Rod regarding
legal questions from FD #38. Coordination withRedmond FD #34. Coordination with King County
10/25/2010 staff on COW and Council info needs, if any. 8.00(Handled by Pat Hamacher and Anne Noris).Preparation of Nov 1 agenda for EC and materialsto be included. Research (LA next steps for
renewaL.
I Sub Total
I Sub Total
I Total
II Tax Suppression
II Executive Director Services
II
II
II
II
70.0 I
16.5 I
86.5 I
Lund Invoice October 25, 2010
12
4
INS LEE , BEST, DOEZIE & RYDER, P. S .P . 0 . BOX 90016
BELLEVUE, WA 98009-9016(425) 455-1234
TAX ID # 91-0872275
King County Flood Control Zone DistrictAt tn: Anne Noris516 Third Ave., Room W-1039Seattle, WA 98104
INVOICE DATEINVOICE NO.ACCOUNT NO.
06/10/10164638361395 - 0001
RE: K. C. Flood Control Zone District -General
Amount Due from Previous StatementPayments Received Since Previous Statement
Last Payment Received On OS/20/10Account AdjustmentFinance ChargeBALANCE FORWARD
DATE
FOR LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH 05/31/10:
ATTY DESCRIPTION05/03/10
05/05/10
05/06/1005/08/10
05/10/10
05/12/10
05/17/10
05/19/1005/19/10
OS/20/10
RPK Commence review of Lily Pointeeasement.
RPK Review J. Rochelle email; researchre hazard mitigation plan; researchre SEPA for hazard mitigation plan;email to J. Rochelle re same; twotelephone calls from K. Lund reDisrict formation and powers.
RPK Review J. Rochelle email re SEPA.RPK Review Lily Pointe easement and
documents; revise opportunity fundresolution.
RPK Email to B. Murray re opportunityfund resolution; review and reviseLily Pointe easement; email to RLarson re same; email to K. Lundand B. Murray re same.
RPK Telephone call to A. Noris recounty facilities agreements;attend executive committee meeting.
RPK Email to K. Lund re revisedopportunity fund resolution; reviewB. Murray email .
RPK Review asset transfer emails.RPK Review agenda for execut i ve
committee meeting.RPK Research re title to property.
HOURS AMOUNT
.20 52.00
2.60 676.00
.101.40
26.00364.00
1.30 338.00
2.90 754.00
.30 78.00
.10 26.00
.10 26.00
1.40 364.00
13
OS/21/10
OS/24/10
OS/24/10
OS/25/10OS/26/10
OS/28/10
PAGE NO. 2INVOICE DATE 06/10/10ACCOUNT NO. 361395-0001
RPK Two telephone conferences with J.Rochelle re title to property, SWSammamish district property andmiscellaneous; email to K. Lund retitle to property.
RAL Two calls from R. Kaseguma reissues re use of flood districtrevenue for WRIA and otherproj ects, ten percent limit;research re same.
RPK Preparatrion for and attendance atexecutive committee meeting;meeting with J. Brewer and R.Bautista; two telephone conferenceswith K. Lund; review J. Breweremail; calls to R. Larson.
RPK Review ordinances re tax levy.RPK Meeting with K. Lund, S. Bleifuhs
and B. Murray re title to property.RPK Email to J. Rochelle re Snoqualmie
parcel; email to B. Murray re PSE;review R. Larsen email and finalLily Pointe easement ¡telephonecall to R. Larsen; reviewappraisals re value of easementswith levees.
Total Fees This Invoice
COSTS ADVANCED THROUGH 05/31/10:
04/05/1004/05/1004/07/1004/07/1004/12/1004/12/10OS/26/1005/31/10
14
ParkingMileageParkingMileageParkingMileageParkingPhotocopies - Office
Total Costs This Invoice
TOTAL FEES AN COSTS THIS INVOICE
2.00 520.00
.50 120.00
4.20 1,092.00
.102.70
26.00702.00
1.50 390.00
$ 5,554.00
19.5011. 2010.0011. 2015.5011. 20
5.00.72
$ 84.32
$ 5,638.32
INSLEE, BEST, DOEZIE & RYDER,P.O. BOX 90016
BELLEVUE, WA 98009-9016(425) 455-1234
TAX ID # 91-0872275
P.S.
HECEIVED
zoin OCT 22 AM 11: 52
CLPKINVor~ BÂ~T"tìaY~~l910INVOICE NO. 168419ACCOUNT NO. 361395 -0001
King County Flood Control Zone DistrictAttn: Anne Noris516 Third Ave., Room W-1039Seattle, WA 98104
RE: K. C. Flood Control Zone District -General
Amount Due from Previous StatementPayments Received Since Previous Statement
Last Payment Received On 10/12/10Account Adj ustmentFinance ChargeBALANCE FORWARD
FOR LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH 09/30/10:
DATE ATTY DESCRIPTION09/01/10 RPK Review email from I. Taylor re Foss
condemnation; review A. Noris email.09/02/10 RPK Review K. Lund email; telephone
call to A. Noris; email to K. Lund.09/03/10 RPK Office conference with M. Frazer re
Okanogan case; review I. Tayloremail re Foss condemnation.
09/Q3/10 MBF Review Fitzgerald case re floodstatutory immunity; officecQnference with R. Kaseguma recase; email to K. Lund re same.
09/06/10 RPK Email to A. Noris re Fosscondemnation.
09/p,8/10 RPK Email to K. Lund and J. Hills reinsurance meeting.
09/11/10 RPK Review I. Taylor email re Fosscondemnation; review emails retitle to property.
09/14/10 RPK Meeting with K. LundandJ. Hillsre insurance coverage policies andissues.
09/16/10 RPK Review Foss condemnationresolution; review applicablestatutes; telephone call to I.Taylor re Foss condemnation; emailto I. Taylor re same.
09/18/10 RPK Review executive committee agendapacket.
$ 13,435.72$ (3,247.40)
$ .00$ .00$ 10,188.32
HOURS AMOUNT
.20 52.00
.60 156.00
.20 52.00
.70 133.00
.10 26.00
.10 26.00
.20 52.00
2.10 546.00
.60 156.00
.10 26.00
15
.,~ .~
PAGE NO. 2INVOICE DATE 10/20/10ACCOUNT NO. 361395 -0001
09/20/10 RPK Attend executive committee meeting;meeting with K. Lund.
09/22/10 RPK Telephone call from B. Schabert reLily Pointe.
09/25/10 RPK Review J. Rochelle email recountyline; research re same; emailto J. Rochelle.
4.10 1,066.00
.40 104.00
.40 104.00
Total Fees This Invoice $ 2,499.00
COSTS ADVANCED THROUGH 09/30/10:
06/28/1006/28/1007/26/1007/26/1008/17/1008/17/1008/23/1008/23/10
ParkingMileageParkingMileageParkingMi leageParkingMileage
21. 5011.2021. 5011.2019.5011. 2019.5011. 20
Total Costs This Invoice $ 126.80
TOTAL FEES AN COSTS THIS INVOICETOTAL AMOUN DUE NOW
$$
2,625.8012,814.12
PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT--1% MO. FINANCE CHAGE ASSESSED AFTER 60 DAYS.TO ASSURE PROMPT CREDIT, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ACCOUNT NO. ON YOUR CHECK.
THIS INVOICE MAY NOT INCLUDE COSTS NOT YET BILLED TO US.
16
INSLEE, BEST, DOEZIE & RYDER, P. S.P.O. BOX 90016
BELLEVUE, WA 98009-9016(425) 455-1234
TAX ID # 91-0872275
King County Flood Control Zone DistrictAttn: Anne Noris516 Third Ave., Room W-1039Seattle, WA 98104
INVOICE DATEINVOICE NO.ACCOUNT NO.
RE: Levy Prorationing (Tax Suppression)
Amount Due from Previous StatementPayments Received Since Previous StatementAccount AdjustmentFinance ChargeBALANCE FORWARD
FOR LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH 09/30/10:
DATE ATTY DESCRIPTION09/01/10 MBF Research re fire tax capacity and
banked capacity; teleconferenceswith A. Ostdiek, outside counsel,Department of Revenue, and Countyassessor re additional newconstruction capacity.
09/03/10 MBF Research re tax capacity of firedistricts; draft outline reresearch; teleconference with A.Ostdiek re tax questions.
09/07/10 MBF Teleconference with P. Hamacher relevy capacity; office conferencewith R. Kaseguma re levy capacity;revise outine re levy capacity.
09/07/10 RPK Telephone call from K. Williams;review county reports rebudget/assessed value; officeconference with M. Frazer re taxsuppression; telephone call to K.Williams re same.
09/08/10 RPK Two telephone conferences with K.Lund.
09/09/10 RPK Two telephone conferences with K.Williams; review D. Reich email;review K. Lund email; review P.Hamacher email; research.
09/09/10 MBF Research re tax levy capacity andnew construction.
HOURS
1. 10
1. 00
3.00
1. 50
.40
1. 00
1. 60
10/20/10168420361395-0002
$$$$$
3,204.00.00.00.00
3,204.00
AMOUNT
209.00
190.00
570.00
390.00
104.00
260.00
304 . 00
17
09/10/10
09/10/10
09/11/10
09/13/10
09/13/10
09/14/1009/14/10
09/15/10
09/16/10
09/17/10
09/17/10
18
MBF
RPK
RPK
RPK
MBF
MBFRPK
MBF
MBF
MBF
RPK
PAGE NO. 2INVOICE DATE 10/20/10ACCOUNT NO. 361395 - 0002
Research re tax levies and newconstruction; office conferenceswith R. Kaseguma re tax levies;review email correspondence from P.Hammacher, Council staff, re taxlevy tables.Two office conferences with M.Frazer re new construction levylimit issue; review P. Hamacheremail and table; review K. Lundemail re table.Review K. Lund email re agenda¡email to K. Lund; email to P.Hamacher and D.Reich.Review D. Reich email andattachments ¡ review P. Hamacheremail and attachments ¡ review draftquestion and answer document¡review other documents; two officeconferences with M. Frazer;telephone conference with P.Hamacher, K. Lund and D. Reich;telephone call from K. Lund rerevenue options; research re same.Teleconference with P. Hamacher retax levy issues; review email fromP. Hamacher re tax tables; emailcorrespondence with R. Kaseguma retax tables; office conferences withR. Kaseguma re tax issues.Attend tax informational meeting.Preparation for meeting withdistricts and others re taxsuppression¡ attend meeting withdistricts and others.Research re excess levies ¡ email toK. Lund re excess levies¡teleconference with A. Ostdiek reexcess levies.Draft email to K. Lund re flood taxquestions ¡ research re riverimprovement fund.Research re river improvement fund ¡research re flood levy capacity;draft email re research to K. Lund.Review K. Lund email; email to K.Lund; email to B. Snure, K.Williams and J. Quinn.
1. 60 304.00
1. 60 416.00
.40 104.00
2.10 546.00
1. 60 304 . 00
.003.90
NO CHAGE1,014.00
1. 10 209.00
.70 133.00
1. 00 190.00
.20 52.00
PAGE NO. 3INVOICE DATE 10/20/10ACCOUNT NO. 3613 95 - 0 0 02
09/18/10 RPK Review advisory committeerecommendation¡ two telephoneconferences with K. Lund.
09/20/10 RPK Review river improvement fund memo;research re fund; telephone call toA. Ostdiek; telephone call to K.Lund; review A. Ostdiek memorandum;review documents; attend caucusmeeting.
09/21/10 RPK Telephone call to A. Ostdiek;research re levy agreement issues.
09/22/10 RPK Review A. Ostdiek email; reviewdraft new language for levyagreement ¡ telephone call from A.Ostdiek; preparation of table forprocess; telephone conference withD. Reich; review new D. Reichtables¡ email to attorneys for firedistricts; review A. Ostdiek email.
09/22/10 MBF Teleconference with A. Ostdiek retax levy issues; review levyagreement and revise language inlevy agreement; research reassessments and new construction.
09/23/10 MBF Review levy agreement; research re$.25 protected tax capacity of firedistrict; office conference with R.Kaseguma re levy issues;teleconference with A. Ostdiek relevy agreement.
09/23/10 RPK Review D. Reich email¡ telephonecall to D. Reich¡ officeconferences with M. Bowen;telephone call from D. Reich;telephone conference with B. Snure,K. Williams and J. Quinn, attorneysfor f ire districts ¡ review K.Williams email; email to K.Williams; work on process table ¡review B. Snure email; email to B.Snure.
09/24/10 RPK Email to K. Lund re letters todistricts; review A. Ostdiek email ¡revise levy agreement ¡ officeconference with M. Bowen; reviseprocess table; email to K. Lund;telephone call to D. Reich;research; two emails to B. Snure¡telephone call to Kent RFA; emailto K. Williams; email to K. Lund;
.60 156. 00
2.90 754. 00
.60 156.00
4.40 1,144.00
1.80 342.00
2.60 494.00
3.40 884.00
3.80 988.00
19
\,. ;i.
09/24/10 MBF
09/27/10 RPK
09/28/1009/29/10
RPKRPK
09/30/10 MBF
09/30/10 RPK
PAGE NO. 4INVOICE DATE 10/20/10ACCOUNT NO. 361395 -0002
review K. Williams email reDistrict 40 i email to K. Williamsre same.Review emails re property taxissues; office conference with R.Kaseguma re flood tax issues.Review P. Hamacher email; telephonecall to J. Quinn; email to K.Williams; telephone call to B.Snure; email toD.Reich; twoemails to K. Lund; telephone callfrom A. Ostdiek; email to B. Snure,K. Williams and J. Quinn; reviselevy agreement i at tend caucusmeeting i telephone call to D. Reich.Review D. Reich and H. Gantz emails.Telephone call from Travis of SiView; research re Si View itelephone call from K. Lund.Research re removal of area fromflood district boundaries iteleconference with R. Kaseguma reresearch; review King Countyordinance re creation of flooddistrict and dissolution of otherdistricts.Review outline of zone removal;review revised attachment A to levyagreement; email to K. Williams resame.
Total Fees This Invoice
TOTAL FEES AN COSTS THIS INVOICETOTAL AMOUN DUE NOW
.40 76.00
4.90 1,274.00
.101. 30
26.00338.00
.80 152.00
.50 130.00
$ 12,213.00
$$
12,213.0015,417.00
PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT--1% MO. FINANCE CHAGE ASSESSED AFTER 60 DAYS.TO ASSURE PROMPT CREDIT, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ACCOUNT NO. ON YOUR CHECK.
THIS INVOICE MAY NOT INCLUDE COSTS NOT YET BILLED TO US.
20
TO: Kjris Lund, Executive Director, King County Flood Control District
FM: Mark Isaacson, Director, King County Water and Land Resources Division
DATE: September 15,2010
RE: Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund, Request for Reprogramming Funds
Per Interlocal Agreements between the King County Flood Control District (District) and King County
jurisdictions directing the administration of the District's Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund, a jurisdiction
can request that funds be reprogrammed from an approved and adopted project to a new project,provided that the new project satisfies the criteria for eligible projects.
The District's Board of Supervisors recently passed a resolution relating to changes to adopted projects
under the Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund (FCD2010-33). As specified in this resolution, changes to
adopted Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund projects in an amount equal to or less than $50,000 can be
approved by the District's Executive Committee rather than requiring action by the full Board of
Supervisors.
Two jurisdictions currently wish to reprogram the funds allocated to them in past years. The changes are
as follows:
. City of Covington - The city submitted an application to apply their 2010 Sub-Regional
Opportunity Fund allocation ($19,406) to the Channing Park Stormwater Facility Rehabiltationproject. The city now wishes to combine the 2010 funds with their 2011 allocation to
construct the Sf 268th Street Drainage Improvement Project. This project will design and
construct storm system improvements to enhance stormwater conveyance and treatstorm water prior to its discharge to Pipe Lake.
. City of Kirkland - The city submitted an application to devote a portion of their 2008-2009
Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund allocation ($50,000) to the Juanita Creek Flood Storage Study.
The city has since received a grant from the Department of Ecology that will fund much of thework originally proposed; therefore, the city now wishes to expand the original Opportunity
Fund scope to allow for the study of and development of conceptual solutions for flooding in
the area around Totem Lake. This change will; in turn, feed into the work proposed by the city
in their 2011 Opportunity Fund application.
In accordance with Resolution FCD2010-33, I respectfully request that the District's Executive
Committee consider these changes as amendments to the Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund projects for
these jurisdictions.
21
King County Water Land Resource DivisionRiver and Floodplain Management tl
King CountySub-Regional Opportunity Fund Project ApplicationA lication Due Date: December 8, 2008
Jurisdiction:
1) Do you wish to forego the receipt of your Opportunity Fund allocation this year, allowing it to accrue for afuture ear? 0 Yes rg No
2) Would you prefer to apply your Opportunity Funds toward an existing project on the District's 6-year CIP?DYes rg No If Yes, lease rovide the name of the ro'ect:
If ou said Yes to either 1 or 2 above, ou do not need to com lete the remainder of this form.
3) Proposed project or activity name Juanita Creek flood storage study
and location:4) Description of the flooding, stormwater, or linked watershed management problem that this project or
activity will address (1500 character maximum):The Juanita Creek watershed experiences flooding during medium to large storm events that impacts structures near the creek
and threatens public safety, partially as a result of lack of floodplain storage. This study would identify opportunities for increasing floodstorage along the creek, and would identify methods by which the City could partner with private propert owners to leverage dollars inconstructing flood storage projects.
Reason for Revision:An Ecology grant project will include much of the work planned to take place in the Juanita Creek Flood Storage Study. Further workmay be needed to identify flood storage sites, but this work should take place after the grant project is complete. This is why Kirklandis requesting to revise the scope of this project.
Revised Study Scope:This revised scope would include study and development of conceptual solutions for flooding that impacts the area around Totem Lake.This funding would allow Kirkland to begin now with the work that is proposed in more detail in the 2011 application for "Totem LakeFloodin Stud and Surve IConce tual Desi n"5) Description of how the proposed activity will address the problem outlined in number 2 (1500 character
maximum):This project will develop a list of capital projects that would increase floodplain storage. The study also would develop methods for
partnering with private property owners to construct projects, thus leveraging FCZD and city dollars
6) Type of
Activity: o Programmatic - identif :
o Other - identify:
7) Describe how the proposed project or activity satisfies the eligibility criteria for at least one of the threecategories listed in Section III of the attached document (1500 character maximum):This project is a stormwater control improvement project that satisfies item 2 of the eligibility requirements.
8) Identify the management plan (i.e. flood control, stormwater control, or watershed management) withinwhich implementation of the project or activity is an element or is recommended:
This project is being implemented as part of Kirkland's 2005 Surface Water Master Plan.
9) Identify deliverables and any relevant design plans or studies (for construction projects):A study report would be the main deliverable for the project.
Page 1 of 2
22
10) Identify a timeline for this project from inception to completion. List any relevant milestones, and provide arough estimate of project costs and budget:4th quarter 2010 Conduct RFP process, select consultant1st quarter 2011 Develop scope, budget, and contract with consultant
2nd 3rd and 4th quarter 2011 Identify opportunities through field visits and hydraulic modeling, field survey and4th quarter 2009 Produce study report
It is estimated that this work will cost a maximum of $50,000. Costs will be refined once a consultant is selected.
For Informational Purposes Only: We wish to inform the Flood Control District Board of Supervisors on how Opportunity Fundsleverage other resources, and we appreciate any information you are willing to provide in this regard. If you plan to partner with otherjurisdictions to conduct a project or otherwise intend to use your Opportunity Fund allocation to leverage grant funds or other surfacewater management funds, please provide us with this information (1200 character limit):
Page 2 of 2
23
King County Water and Land Resources DivisionRiver and Floodplain Management Section ll
King ContySub-Regional Opportunity Fund Project ApplicationA Iication Due Date: Au ust 31, 2009
Jurisdiction: City of Covington
1) 00 you wish to forego the receipt of your Opportunity Fund allocation this year, allowing it to accrue for afuture ear? D Yes ¡g No
2) Would you prefer to apply your Opportunity Funds toward an existing project on the District's 6-year CIP?DYes ¡g No If Yes, lease rovide the name of the ro'ect:
If ou said Yes to either 1 or 2 above, ou do not need to com lete the remainder of this form.
3) Proposed project or activity name SE 268lh St. Drainage Improvement Project
and location:4) Description of the flooding, stormwater, or linked watershed management problem that this project or
activity will address (1500 character maximum):SE 268lh St in its current condition allows stormwater to leave the right-of-way and enter private property. This stormwater has
entered garages of residents that live along this street. The existing roadway does not provide adequate stormwater control nortreatment rior to enterin Pi e Lake.5) Description of how the proposed activity will address the problem outlined in number 4 (1500 character
maximum):The City of Covington recognizes that constructing certain storm system improvements in and along a portion of SE 268th Street
will improve both surface drainage and water quality. As such, the City desires to facilitate the design and construction of such stormdrainage and related roadway restoration improvements in and along a portion of SE 268th St, east of 21 Olh Ave SE.The new storm conveyance improvements shall consist of a combination of storm pipe and ditches. The anticipated improvementsinclude catch basins, storm piping, trenching, water quality and quantity features, and surface/pavement restoration. Surfacerestoration may include pavement (patch only) restoration, pavement overlay, wedge curbs, grass, crushed surfacing top course
(shoulder rock), and other related items as desired and further directed by the City. The work does not include full-street reconstructionand/or realignment.
6) Type of
Activity: D Pro rammatic - identif :
o Other - identify:
7) Describe how the proposed project or activity satisfies the eligibility criteria for at least one of the threecategories listed in Section III of the attached document (1500 character maximum):This project meets the eligibility requirements as listed in Section Iii as it is a stormwater improvement project that is consistent with
the re uirements of the Cit of Covin ton stormwater com rehensive Ian.8) Identify the management plan (i.e. flood control, stormwater control, or watershed management) within
which implementation of the project or activity is an element or is recommended:Stormwater Control Reconstruction Plan
9) Identify deliverables and any relevant design plans or studies (for construction projects):Design Plans, Specifications, Estimates, Project Bidding & Construction
10) Identify a timeline for this project from inception to completion. List any relevant milestones, and provide anestimate of project costs and budget:Design anticipated to be complete near the end of 2010
Construction anticipated to begin in the spring of 2011Construction antici ated to be com ete fall 2011
Page 1 of 2
24
For Informational Purposes Only: We wish to inform the Flood Control District Board of Supervisors on how Opportunity Fundsleverage other resources, and we appreciate any information you are willing to provide in this regard. If you plan to partner with otherjurisdictions to conduct a project or otherwise intend to use your Opportunity Fund allocation to leverage grant funds or other surfacewater management funds, please provide us with this information (1200 character limit):
Page 2 of 2
25
King C
ounty Flood C
ontrol District
Subregional O
pportunity Fund A
llocationsAttachment G
Oclob~r 1J, 2010
2011 Opportunity
JurisdictionFund A
Bocation
Profect Nam
eProfect D
O!:crlotion
AI on;;
3935N
IAA
ccrual-offundsfora future ear.A
uburn$69.300
South 29611' Street Pond Ex angion, Phase I
Ex and detention (aeili to decrease storm
water runoff dischar e rales and reduce (ribula overfow
s.B
eaux Arts
$1143N
IAA
ccrual of lunds fora future ear.R
estoro channel conveyance capacity by dredging accumulated sedim
enls and stabilizing the streambank im
mediately dow
nstream of the
Bel!eviliO
~359 701SE
30th Street/Sunset Creek 1m
rovement - Phase II
Phase I culvert which w
ill hel to contain Ihe 100.vear nood even!~~m
g.nd.tS248
NIA
Äccnial off\inds for a future V
ear.Install a new
drainage inlel and uDsize c:.isling storm
pipes to allow for ennanced slorm
wa!er canveyance and reduced nooding of private
80lhcll$277A
fiV
iliacic S U(lC
Storm D
rain,; e Imorovem
eri!s Pro'eetraoerlV
.8urien
$50,666N
/AA
ccrual of funds for ¡: fuli,re ear,C
;¡rraiion$2163
NIA
for a future ear,ei de H
ill$16,017
NIA
for a future Vear.
Covinaton
$19759SE
26811' 51. Drain,;. 0 Im
nrovemer! Pro'ect
Design and construct storm
system im
provements to enhance slorm
water conveyance and treal storriw
aler prior to being discharged 10Pi c lake.
Des M
oinesN
JAA
ccrual of funds fora futUre ear
Duvall
$8 928C
arrie Rae Pond R
iitrofiIncrease slorm
waler ond dA
th ;:nrl volume to rov'de now
con(rol and water oualit im
rovements
Enum
claw$11077
NIA
Accru;:l of funds for a future year
FedmalW
a$92,684
NIA
Accrual offuiids fora future ear
Hunts Point
$8537N
IAA
ccrual of funds fora future ear
IssêlrllJahR
iimove eiicro;ichm
erits and debris from E
ast Fork Issaquah Creek to im
prove conveyance and reduce residential flooding. Funds wil also
$65,064E
ast Fork Chanriellm
orovements / M
iti ation ProflCt D
eveioomB
ntbe used for siirvev and D
relíminarv diisi n of future nood m
iti alion "ro'eclsK
enmore
$30,875N
fAA
ccrual of fund:: fora future ear,Pursue easem
ent ¡'ld property acquisitions and prepare geotechnic¡;1 reporls and preliminary design ptans to support bringing the levee
.Kent
$115281SR
516 (0 S. 231st Levee C
ertification Pro'cetsvstem
to fcderallcvee slandards for certification and accreditationH
orseshoe lake: evaluate the feasibility of pumping H
orseshoe Lake to a privale infiltration pond to reduce flooding of residential areas
and public infrastructure. May C
reAk: rem
ove veg,:tatìon and sediment to increase conveyance capacity and im
plement sedim
ent control~S-!~nt
$475905H
orseshne l_ake Infitration & M
a Creek Flood R
eductionfealures to reduce tram
;nort into Ma C
reekC
onduct survey and modeling of T
otem L
ake and its outlet to identify options for reducing frequency and severity of flooding due to reducedK
irkland$1111136
To(em
LC
lke Fioodin" Studv and Survev/ConC
B tual D
es, nslor;'necanacit
L~ke ¡:ores! Park
$23,346N
IAA
ccrual a/funds for;: rulurii carM
;i Ie Val18
$27,043N
IAA
ccrual oflunds lor a fi!lure earC
onstruct improvem
ents to the pond weir outlet con!rcllo provide nietsred discharge 01 slorm
water runoff to m
alch downstream
channelM
edina$28,398
Medina Park Storm
water PQ
nrllm rovem
enlsca"aeit and thus reduce residential floodinQ
,Stabilize the (013 of steep ravine slopes 10 rireven\ erosion, prevenl possible undercutting of structures, and im
prove the water quality of the
MercerlSlilnd
$96863B
asinfi.3 W;¡lerC
Ol¡seSlabilization Pro'8C
Iw
a(ercourseêindofLakeW
;¡shin tonM
illon:!830
NIA
Accrual of funds for;i fultJrE
earN
ewcastle
NIA
Accrual riffundii fnr a fuhlrA
vear.N
ormandv Park
$1;N
IAA
ccrual ofrunds fora future Year,
North B
erid$9,025
NIA
Accrueil of funds for;i fulure A
iHP;icifi
$1,694N
fAA
ccru;:i ofluncls fcif il fUIU
H: vC
Clr
Redm
ond$133.187
Vlillow
moor Flood lain R
C$toralioo
Con!ributiol1lo Flood C
ontrol District U
Witill oro'eel
Renton
956C
edi'r River G
ravel Rem
oval ProBC
!C
orilritiu!iol1 to Flood Control D
istrict cll itill ro'ectS'm
m,m
;,hN
fAA
ccrual offurids foril future veelr.\850
NIA
Accrtaiolfundsfora future oar
S,=~iV
!'I
$1,3111,1:\.:M
idvaie Strirmw
;iler Fi'r:ililv~~~~tr:~)~:rf bv rl"m
riV¡'''N
susn:I;:i:~~~I~r IhB 25,ycëir slorm
in an ;:rca rif .~lrirmw
;:IAr 'inorlina ilrid r.on!'trucl ti w
ril pond to treat low now
174.86:"..
to nnh;ince capacity 10 remove storm
Wiltl'r from
;i r.lri"ed rlewe"sio(1 and provide up to 100.ys;:r O
ood protectionSboreline
Pum" St..lion 25 R
elrofit ProeetS
k komish
NIA
Acr:rual offurids fora fulure ear
Snog:;ilmir
$11\791)Shr:relino M
aS!8r PrOQ
r"m U
;idilteC
onducl technical rp5p.;:rch 10 SU. orl com
lelirin of the Shoreline M"s(cr Pm
ramC
ontribiition of fuods to a levee easement ;ir:quisitirin neC
eSiiêlry for a lavel' repriir projp,ct conslriiclrid in 2008 at Site 3 on tho Tukw
ilcl 205T
ukwila
3112,647L
ev"e Easem
e_l1tAcriuisitirin .liiV
PointeIA
vee
IW
oor:imiille
$28.012N
IAA
ccrual of fimds for a future vear
Y;:rrow
Priin($a 340
CiPl/l . Surve and Preiirninary D
iisi nProvide d~sirin ror IJ sizino of in¿idoqual81 .~izcd and cracker: s!orm
Wiiter i c
..fol",1$3,607,O
J1
Accruals
Projects$.')02.791 14%
$3.104,240 86%
\.N
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kjris Lund
FROM: Rod Kaseguma/eghan Frazer
DATE: October 21,2010
RE: King County Flood District Levy Legislation
Under RCW 84.52.043(2), the aggregate levy rate of taxing districts canot exceed$5.90/1 ,000 A V ("rate limit"). This year, because of lower assessed values and a highercounty levy, the aggregate levies in several tax code areas within the Flood District likelyexceed the rate limit and the Flood Distrct's levy wil be prorated. This is likely toreoccur in the next several years. You have asked me to prepare a sumary of severaloptions for proposed state legislation to protect the Flood District's levy from proration.
Option One:· Completely exempt county-wide Flood Districts' levies from the $5.90 rate limit by
adding a complete exemption for such Districts under RCW 84.52.043(2).· Model: Under RCW 84.52.043(2)(g), the rate limit does not apply to any of ferry
districts' levies.
Option Two:· Protect a portion of county-wide Flood Districts' levies from the $5.90 rate limit by
amending RCW 84.52.043(2). For example, the statute could protect $.10 out of the$.50 authorized for the Districts from the rate limit.
· Model: Under RCW 84.52.043(2)(i) and RCW 84.15.125, the rate limit does notapply to a portion of Fire Distrcts' levies ($.25) (the Districts also get to choose totake the protection).
Option Thee:· Move county-wide Flood Distrcts down the proration order under RCW
84.52. 125(g)(2) to be prorated with the other junior taing districts.· For example, curently, Flood Districts are at the second level, however, they could
be moved to the third level to share proration with the hospitals, metropolita parks,cemetery and other junor taing distrcts.
· For another example, a portion of Flood District's levies could be moved down theproration order to the next level to share proration with other junor taing districts or
specific taing districts.
Option Four:
· Create a hybrid of the above options with specific legislation applying to county-wideFlood Districts, contingent upon certin conditions.
409068.1136139510001 -1- 27
· For example, the legislation could protect a certain amount of the Flood Distrcts'levy rate from the $5.90 rate limit. However, this protection would only be extendedif a Flood District's entire levy would otherwise be eliminated.
· For another example, the legislation could guarantee Flood Districts a certin levyrate so long as the. levies of no other junor taxing districts (or certin specific taing
districts) are not completely eliminated.· For another example, the legislation could have the Flood Districts share taxing
authority with other specific taxing districts.
I
28 40968.1136139510001 -2-
-~¡Jdiiment
DIY
islonProgramC
ontactPhone
Grantor
FE
MA
Pre-D
isaster Mitioation
Wilderness R
im P
re Disaster M
itigation
King C
ounty Grant A
lert
APPlication D
ue Date
October 15, 2010
~~f-~~
V;L~
iDate ReC'Vri~ ..e AA~ppr'Vri IMials
Dept lG
P.i~
./1.BUdget __ ~
OFM
Cont~
Prelim
inary Project T
itle
Potential King C
Ounty B
Udget Im
pact
G,'O
lo". S'''.m", O
f Ini", In '''flng G"ni p,oPo."
Thi, g"ni 'PpilpO
lion In '-,p"" 10 /h. SI"" Em
.",,,,y M,n,g'm
'm O
'''''on ""Oil"'on of ''"'"''', fu, Ih. FY
2011 P,.OI,,,I,, M
m9'1I" G
"ni Thi, P'"g"m
''"''d.. g"ni, 1010pO�
g""nm.m, 10 pI,n, d'''gn 'nd Impl'm'm OO""ff.~I'O ,mi"i, d"'gn" 10 '-d"" "''-'Onl "n"I"" d'm'9' pO",,, by 'I"d''-''''d "'ni,
BA
SIC
GR
AN
T IN
¡:OR
MA
TlO
N
Date A
Ward to be A
nnounced
Sarino 2011
Potential A
Ward A
mount:
Required cx Cash Match:
Required O
ther Match:
$?Q
354,469lQ
Total P
otential Value:
% of FUnd Appropriation:
POSsible FT
E A
ddllions:
~$ 118,156
-- -
-T-~ $--
- ~
~~?9
~AWard Maximums: $
Range of Y
earsC
OY
ered: 2010/20144
FUIU", Funding LI'bll".. On"Udlng .un'.ettng c,,t., If "pllpOble. '" In"'Uc"on.;,
eXIST
ING
POL
ICY
/PLA
N eN
AB
LIN
G T
HIS G
RA
NT
Th. 'I"d" ",. CU"'mly OOn",I, of ,'ngl, f'mi, '-."""'1 cnil, " """" I" 1010, "''""," In , "O"d d.,,-,,i,, Ih" h" hOd '-'''''d lIonding "" Ih. y"" M"y hom" In iil, ,,-, w''-
,"b",nii,iiy d,m'9'd " , ""'" of 1I00ding In J'nco'Y 2009 "d In P'-"'" ''''', Thl, ,mi." will "," Ih. "'''"on of Ih, 8,-W'I" "k. """'0 '''nt,,, Ih. dOl'nlion ""'g.
In Sntw"" "k. ""
''-''ni 'I"ding of Ih. down"'''m
hom", ,
PR
ELiM
INA
R Y
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
N O
F K
ING
CO
UN
TY
PR
OP
OS
AL
s---~
--D
oes this grant replace Currently
appropriated funds?
DY
ES
0NO
If Yes, am
ount displaced:S
ource of diSc/ace fU
nds:
GR
AN
T A
l!;RT
wnderness R
;m F
!;MA
PD
M F
Y 2011
KIN
G C
OU
NT
Y F
LOO
D C
ON
TR
OL Z
ON
E D
IST
RIC
T N
OT
/FlC
A T
/ON
A OOpy of lll, 'ntnl 'I," h" been 'm''''d to Ih. King C"n~ Flood Con"oI Zone 01"""" ."'"",, COm
011"" 'nd ''''"'''' 01"
"Of,
RE
QU
IRE
D K
ING
CO
UN
TY
CO
UN
CIL
AC
TIO
N, IF A
PPLIC
AB
LE
Impl'm.,.lioo Of iil, g"nI Wil "001" ''''"''on of" In
''''000 I A
"Oem
.nl. A '''0,0111., O
f ''P''''d "g''''''oo I, ""hcomlng
'"h" Ih, '''IIOO
''on "lmP/.m
"''''on Woo" b"'fii from
Kin, C
"nly C"ooiJ O
f"'''hOfI""oo, A
1;"'0111.1 of P'P,",,, I.gi",,,oo " fOrth"m
lng
::~C;')
rnc:ooil
DN
RP
WL
River and Floodplain M
anagement
~eve B
lelfuhs, Manager
296-8011
King C
ounty Grant A
lert
King C
ounty Flood Control D
istrict Severe Repetitive L
oSSA
cquislon Project
Prelim
inary Project T
itle
RE
VIE
W/A
PPRO
VA
L.
Date R
ec'vd .. í'lt: AN
fdt...rra'sS:~t.~
Departm
entD
ivisionProgramC
ontactPhone
Oept
Budget
OF
M C
ontrol No.
BASIC GRANT INFORMA TION
Application D
ue Date
October 15, 2010
Date A
ward to be A
nnouncedJune 1. 2011
Grantor
Federal E
me
Grantor'S
Statem
ent of ìntent In \.ettlng Grant proposal
H"" m
l".U,n ,,,nt. ",11.b~ .",",h "" F.d"'1 E
m'_" M
,n...m.nli'- (FE
MA
I ,.,de ""Ing I' "'". d."I" I'"" .nd ,rolod "10 .nd ,ro,'" lrom "," il,,,I.,,. T
h.¡(, eou'~ Floo' Contrl Olotd 58"" "",.mi" L," Aa,.ill Pro'" .,""1.' w" ,,,"""d 1M """,li "de, FEMA' S."" R.pe"'. L'" (SRLI "",,m, .01," i.
""mln.I''' "d" "" "I'" ,,,,,,,. of "" H
""d MI\'U
on A"""" pr,m
on: Thio p""m
m.. 10 "''' "" I"""''' ,\ok ,,,,,""" w
it 'ooilng ""I' ,,,, mi".ti" lhO
"structures that place the greatest financial burden on the N
ational Fiood Insurance F
und.
Total potential V
alue:
% of F
und AP
propriation:
Possible FTE
Additons:
W.
Wi
wi
Wl
2914
$915,520
$101,724
-$-"---
-$1,017 ,244
$-
-$.
T
0.0%-
0.2%0.0%
0,0%0.0%
PRE
LIM
INA
RY
DE
SCR
IPTIO
N O
F KIN
G C
OU
NT
Y PR
OPO
SAL
.
Award Maximums: $ 915,250
Range of Y
earsCovered: 2011
potential King C
ounty Budget Im
pact
potential Aw
àrd Am
ount:Require ex Cash Match:
Required O
ther Match:
Does thls grant replace currently
appropriated funds'?
DY
ES
WN
OIf yes, am
ount displaced:S
ource of dlsolace funds:
T"" '''i.d wi "".", "' ..',,'.Iiy ",n'" ,,,,.,,., ,.."" "" ~""'""., ,no ".iom lhe ,... 10 n"'''' "",ip". ,,--.. . The prpert~. ''' 100''' wltl' "" U "" sno,,,imi. "i",
wa"",""d "" .'" FEMM...n.' 58"" "".... i- ,roP"'''' .0"" ""''", .", 'I"" i"".ed flod d,m.,' on ""'''' ="" "" "'., ,-,"" flod d'... '" ,,,,,. '" "
"e.. of "". flodin ri.k ,,' ". ,.m'''''' b_ ,he .1""',,' of "' '" ,""" fl. 'unln, "" ,m
nt wi dim
i,," "" rt.k of ,"". " "".. ,,, ,nd mil,,,. M
'" "00' ..m.. u,on
""I',, lho ,,,i ""n!, lOng e,," W.'" ,nd COnd Re"''' 01"""" ~,ff wi "'.... , """,,. .nd ,,10 "m""" wI\h "," pr,'" ""¡ FEMA i"di', WI' "",rt 90% of "" ",,'oo~ 'I
\he ,,,,i.llion 'ro... wI\h \h. ",m,in, 10% ,om'" ii,m ice monl" "" "" ¡(, Cou'~ Flood Co"". 0\0"01 ,,,,,. "li" no "po' 10 "''' ,,,,,. .",d, .. ""m""" .",.,,"" 'I".
_ ""i.", . "" ""\i'""
In""'' In "'i. '''''"lion. ,,,,,,,om, "" odd' 'i """ins "" ,,,nt ,,,"~ high. "ih ,m
n ,,,mm
oum"" h" · "",nw
. _," ,f fund.. In .dd'Io' 10""",,, ,,,¡~,,,, ""Id" '" W
LR
O, K
J eo"~ OD
ES w
W be "" In ",,,e prj.", Iof de,noi..n pe,m
l\ .nd "de oom,II'''.
Future Fundln Liabilties (Includin sun-setting costs, If ap /lcab/e. see Instructlons):
EX
IST
ING
PO
LICY
/PL.A
N E
NA
BL.IN
G T
HIS
GR
AN
T
,,I""" 1572' ..Iobii.h" "'. Kin, eou'~ Flood Co"'1 D."' " . ,"10 prlod ""I' ""it ,nd "f.~, ",.", .oonomlo """', ,,,,, "" ,,,,,, prpe"'''' "" "".,,,,.'10' """,,,
_ 'ho Mol"~ '"',''''' wit fling p",~lng ml\"lon " "pe"" 10" ,,,pe"' . , ,""" of "" 0.''' on""''' "''' ,,,,, '" wlti' "" """, F.od Oi.1f """gy. NOTE, Th. 1001 m"'" I"
this grant wil be in part funded w
ith Increased Cost of C
ompliance m
onles.
RE
QU
IRE
D K
ING
coUN
TY
CO
UN
CIL A
CT
ION
, IF A
PP
LICA
BLE
o implmon",tion ,f th. ,m" wUl ",'i" "'"on of" """,,,, _on!. A "',..1 of ,'--' ..",.ii I. Io"""ml',.
o 8"' "" ,''I,,"" "implm
.""'" ""Id bo'''' frm lO
ng Co"~ e",,'" "..."",,.'ii. A
'''''m.. of ,'-"" i....ii ."""""in',
KIN
G C
OU
NT
Y FI.O
OD
CO
NT
RO
L. Z
ON
E D
ISTR
ICT
NoT
IFICA
TIO
N
GJ A
",py ,f "'Ie ,,," ,~rt ..' _ pr"""" " "" 10', eou~ Floo e_1 i- 01'''01'' ,,,,IN, C
oml- "d ,,,,IN
' 01"""o("
Gian A
l,rt KC
FCO
SR" A
CQ
""-' (RIdIl)
King C
ounty Grant A
lert/ .(:_
· 4g. ~REVIEW/APPROVAP ls. M
Date Ree'vd Dale Appr'vd Initials '
Dept :5'( 50
Budget -
OFM
Control N
o.
Departm
entD
ivisionProgramC
ontactPhone
DN
RP
WL
RD
River and Floodplain
Managem
ent
Steve S
ieifuhs, Manager
296-8011
King County
Flood ContrÖIDi.strict Severe
Repetitive L
ossH
omeE
levàtiön Project
Prelim
inary Project T
itle
BASIC GRANT INFORMA TION
Grantor's Statem
ent of Intent in Lettng G
rant ProposalHazard mitigation.grantsavailable through theFèderalEmergencyManagementAgency (FEMA) proXidefundingto reduce. disaster losses.
and protect
life and property from future disasters. T
heKing County Flood
Control District Severe Repetitive LossHomeElevation ProjectapplicationwassÚbmitted forconsiderationunderFEMA's Severe
Repetitive Lo.ss(S
RL) program
, which is
administered under the unified guidance oftheHazard MitigàtiohAssistance Program. This
program
seeks to reduce thelong-term
riskassociatedwithflooding w
hile also mitigating those
structures that place thegreätèstfinancial
burden on
the N
ationaJFlood ..1 nsuranceF
und.
Application D
ue Date
October 15, 2010
Date A
ward to be A
nnouncedJune 1,2011
Potential A
ward A
mount:
Required C
X C
ash Match:
Required O
ther Match:
20102011 2012
$ 757,732
20132014
Aw
ard Maxim
ums: $
Range of
Years
Covered: 2011
Potential King C
ounty Budget Im
pact
0.0%0.0%
Does this grant replace
appropriated funds? A...-m............
DY
ES
m~
If yes, amount disP
laced:fSource of displace funds~~
~....~rnC
J
Total Potential V
alue: $ .% of Fund Appropriation' - 0.0%
Possible FTE
Additons:
T-~32 J0.0% - 0.0%
$$
PR
ELIM
INA
RY
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
N O
F K
ING
CO
UN
TY
PR
OP
OS
AL
This project will elevate six residential structures
at leastthree feetabovethebasefloodelevation,perKingCountyCode. The
structures arealJJocateid within the Snoqualmie
watershed, in
both the U
pperand Lower Snoqualmie valleys.
All of the residencesareFEMA-deSj.gryat~dSevereRepetitive Los.sstructpres,whichindlcates they
have incurred
flood damage on numerous occasions
and filed numerous
flood claims. All structures areinareas of
high flooding risk
and are
significantly below.the elevatIorroHhel%chanceflood,Funding.thisgrantwil.reducethe risk of damage to these
structures and
mitigate future flood cialms. Upon receiving
the grant award,èachÓftheproperty owners will recéiveFËMA funding to support 90% of the
costofthe elevation project, w
ith the remaining 10%
being theresponsibility of the property owner. Little to no OppositiontothisgràhHs .expected,asnumeroushome efevationshave been completed
in the
neighborhoods included in this application. Furthermore,
theodds of receiving this grant are very high, as this grant program
currently has a nationwide surplus offunds,lnaddition to technical
assistance provided
by WLRD, King CountyDDES will.be involved
inthese projects from a permitting
and code compliance perspeC
tive.F
uture Funding Liabilties (including sun-settng costs, if applicable. see instructions):
EX
ISTIN
G PO
LIC
Y/PL
AN
EN
AB
LIN
G T
HIS G
RA
NT
Ordinance 15728 established
the King County FloodCohtrolDistrict.asa means to
protect pUblicheälthahdsäfeiy,JegiClnal.econ6mi¿Zel)t~rs,PÜ~j¡càndUprivate properties, and
transportation corridors
from the risks associated with flooding. Providing mitigàtiohto repetitive losspropertiès is apriority
of the
District;
therefore, this grant
fits within the
overall Flood District
strategy. NOTE: The
local matC
h forthis grant does not require Flood D
istrict funds but ratherWillbeprovided by the hom
eowners. A
dditionälly,lhese funds will be transferreddirectlyfrom
the homeow
ner to the contractor conducting the work,
.thus the local match will not require any King County bud
gel appropriation.
RE
QU
IRE
D K
ING
CO
UN
TY
CO
UN
CIL
AC
TIO
N, IF A
PPLIC
AB
LE
o Impl,m,,'''loc of thl, ,coot will "gei" ,,,,,,Ioc of '" 'oter'o",' A""m"t. A '""mit,1 of pro
po", legi,t,iioc i, Iort=109. I
D E
ither the application or implem
entation would benefi from
King C
ounty Council pre-authorization. A
transmittal of proposed legislation is forthcom
ing.
KIN
G C
OU
NT
Y. F
LOO
D C
ON
TR
OL Z
ON
E D
IST
RIC
T N
OT
IFIC
A T
ION
o A copy of this grant alert has been provided to the King County Flood Control Zone District's Executive Committee and Executive Director. I
Oranl A
lert KC
FCO
SRL
Hom
e Elevations