kriging · 2007-07-07 · effect of estimated covariance structure the usual geostatistical method...

24
1.2 Kriging

Upload: others

Post on 15-Apr-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

1.2 Kriging

Page 2: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Research goals inair quality research

Calculate air pollution fields for healtheffect studiesAssess deterministic air quality modelsagainst dataInterpret and set air quality standardsImproved understanding ofcomplicated systemsPrediction of air quality

Page 3: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

The geostatistical model

Gaussian processµ(s)=EZ(s) Var Z(s) < ∞

Z is strictly stationary if

Z is weakly stationary if

Z is isotropic if weakly stationary and

Z(s),s !D " R2

(Z(s1),...,Z(sk )) =d

(Z(s1 +h),...,Z(sk +h))

µ(s) ! µ Cov(Z(s1),Z(s2 )) = C(s1 " s2)

C(s1 ! s2) = C0( s1 ! s2 )

Page 4: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

The problem

Given observations at n locationsZ(s1),...,Z(sn)estimate

Z(s0) (the process at an unobserved site)

(an average of the process)

In the environmental context often timeseries of observations at the locations.

Z(s)d!(s)A

"or

Page 5: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Some history

Regression (Galton, Bartlett)Mining engineers (Krige 1951,Matheron, 60s)Spatial models (Whittle, 1954)Forestry (Matérn, 1960)Objective analysis (Grandin, 1961)More recent work Cressie (1993), Stein(1999)

Page 6: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

A Gaussian formula

If

then

X

Y

!

" #

$

% & ~ N

µX

µY

!

" #

$

% & ,

'XX 'XY'YX 'YY

!

" #

$

% &

!

" #

$

% &

(Y |X) ~ N(µY + !YX!XX"1(X"µX ),

!YY " !YX!XX"1

!XY )

Page 7: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Simple krigingLet X = (Z(s1),...,Z(sn))T, Y = Z(s0), so that

µX=µ1n, µY=µ,ΣXX=[C(si-sj)], ΣYY=C(0), and

ΣYX=[C(si-s0)].

Then

This is the best unbiased linear predictorwhen µ and C are known (simple kriging).

The prediction variance is

p(X) ! Z(s0 ) = µ + C(si " s0 )[ ]TC(si " sj )#$ %&

"1

X " µ1n( )

m1 = C(0) ! C(si ! s0 )[ ]TC(si ! sj )"# $%

!1

C(si ! s0 )[ ]

Page 8: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Some variants

Ordinary kriging (unknown µ)

where

Universal kriging (µ (s)=A(s)β for some spatialvariable A)

Still optimal for known C.

p(X) ! Z(s0 ) = µ + C(si " s0 )[ ]TC(si " sj )#$ %&

"1

X " µ1n( )

µ = 1nT C(si ! sj )"# $%

!1

1n( )!1

1nT C(si ! sj )"# $%

!1

X

! = ( A(si )[ ]TC(si " sj )#$ %&

"1A(si )[ ])"1

A(si )[ ]TC(si " sj )#$ %&

"1X

Page 9: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Universal kriging variance

E Z(s0 ) ! Z(s0 )( )2

= m1 +

A(s0 ) ! [A(si )T[C(si ! sj )]

!1[C(si ! s0 )]( )T

"( A(si )[ ]TC(si ! sj )#$ %&

!1

A(si )[ ])!1

" A(s0 ) ! [A(si )T[C(si ! sj )]

!1[C(si ! s0 )]( )

simple kriging variance

variability due to estimating β

Page 10: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

The (semi)variogram

Intrinsic stationarityWeaker assumption (C(0) needs notexist)Kriging predictions can be expressed interms of the variogram instead of thecovariance.

! ( h ) =1

2Var(Z(s + h) " Z(s)) = C(0) " C( h )

Page 11: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Ordinary kriging

where

and kriging variance

!

Z(s0 ) = ! iZ(si )i=1

n

"

!T = " + 11# 1T$#1"1T$#11

%

&'(

)*

T

$#1

" = (" (s0 # s1),...," (s0 # sn))T

$ ij = " (si # sj )

m1(s0 ) = 2 ! i" (s0 # si )i=1

n

$ # ! i! j" (si # sj )j=1

n

$i=1

n

$

Page 12: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Parana data

Built-in geoR data setAverage rainfall over different years forMay-June (dry-season)143 recording stations throughoutParana State, Brazil

Page 13: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Parana precipitation

Page 14: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Fitted variogram

Page 15: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Is it significant?

Page 16: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Kriging surface

Page 17: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Kriging standard error

Page 18: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

A better combination

Page 19: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Spatial trend

Indication of spatial trendFit quadratic in coordinates

Page 20: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Residual variogram

Page 21: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Effect of estimatedcovariance structure

The usual geostatistical method is toconsider the covariance known. When it isestimated• the predictor is not linear• nor is it optimal• the “plug-in” estimate of thevariability often has too low mean

Let . Is a goodestimate of m2(θ) ?

p2 (X) = p(X;!(X))

m1(!(X))

m2(!) = E!(p2 (X) " µ)2 m1(!)

Page 22: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Some results

1. Under Gaussianity, m2(θ) ≥ m1(θ) withequality iff p2(X)=p(X;θ) a.s.2. Under Gaussianity, if is sufficient,and if the covariance is linear in θ, then

3. An unbiased estimator of m2(θ) is

where is an unbiased estimator ofm1(θ).

!

E!m1(!) =m2(!) " 2(m2 (!) "m1(!))

2m !m1(")

m

Page 23: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Better predictionvariance estimator

(Zimmerman and Cressie, 1992)

(Taylor expansion; often approx. unbiased)

A Bayesian prediction analysis takesaccount of all sources of variability (Le andZidek, 1992; 2006)

Var(Z(s0;!)) "m1(!)

+2 tr cov(!) #cov($Z(s0;!)%&

'(

Page 24: kriging · 2007-07-07 · Effect of estimated covariance structure The usual geostatistical method is to consider the covariance known. When it is estimated • the predictor is not

Some references

N. Cressie (1993) Statistics for Spatial Data. Rev. ed.Wiley. Pp. 105-112,119-123, 151-157.Zimmerman, D. L. and Cressie, N (1992): Mean squaredprediction error in the spatial linear model withestimated covariance parameters. Annals of theInstitute of Statistical Mathematics 44: 27-43.Le N. D. and Zidek J. V. (1992) Interpolation WithUncertain Spatial Covariances–A Bayesian AlternativeTo Kriging. 43 (2): 351-374.N. D. Le and J. V. Zidek (2006) Statistical Analysis ofEnvironmental Space-Time Processes. Springer-Verlag.