language and cognition colombo, june 2011 day 2 introduction to linguistic theory, part 4
TRANSCRIPT
Transformational grammar
• Chomsky (1957, 1965)– Two stages phrase structures for a sentence
• Build Deep Structure– Build from phrase structure rules– One constituent at a time
• Convert to Surface Structure– Built from transformations that operate on the deep
structure» Adding, deleting, moving
– Operate on entire strings of constituents
S --> NP VPVP --> V (NP)NP --> (A) (ADJ) N
Transformational grammar• 1 deep structure, 2 surface
structures:– Active/passive sentences:
• The man bit the dog.• The dog was bitten by the man.
• 2 deep structures, 1 surface structure:
• Sherlock saw the man with binoculars
Passive transformation rule:
NP1 + V + NP2 ---> NP2 + be + V + -en + by + NP1
Syntactic movement
• The sailor is kissing the girl• Who is the sailor kissing?
• The sailor is kissing who• Who is the sailor tis kissing tthe girl/who?
Psycholinguistic evidence for trace
in the garage
S
NP VP
NPVP PP
Deep structure Surface structure
The car
was put (trace)
NP VP
NPVP PP
S
in the garage
the carwas put
Movement transformation
probe
Some “activation” of car
• evidence for reactivation of moved constituent at the trace position
I to C movementBruce can play the didgeridoo.Can Bruce play the didgeridoo?He might annoy the neighbours.Might he annoy the neighbours?He has lost his mind.Has he lost his mind?The earplugs are helping.Are the earplugs helping?
• In each of the derived questions above, the auxiliary verb {can, might, has, are}has moved from its original position to the front of the sentence
• This kind of movement, previously referred to as ‘Subject-Auxiliary Inversion’, is now described as I to C movement
I to C movement• Notice that S = IP• C is a functional
head that has a projection higher than the level of the sentence
• The moved element is shown with an arrow attached, linking it to its original position
• The trace of movement is marked with a t
Let’s do one together….
• Using either PS rules or the X-bar style trees, draw diagrams for the following sentences, showing the movement:– The boy ate the apple– Did the boy eat the apple?– What did the boy eat?
Introduction to theta theory• Sentence = predicate (an expression denoting an event or a
state) and a set of arguments (the participants in the event)
• The arguments of a verb = the subject and object• Complements of verbs = objects: they are positioned inside
the first projection of the V, so they are called internal arguments
• Subjects are positioned outside the verb’s first projection, so they are called external arguments
• But arguments can be understood in different ways – they play different roles in the events denoted by the predicate
• a typology of thematic roles
Thematic roles• Theme or Patient: entity undergoing the effect of
some actionMary fell over
• Agent or Causer: the instigator of some actionJohn kissed Mary
• Experiencer: entity experiencing some psychological stateBill felt sad
• Recipient or Possessor: entity receiving or possessing something
Mary got John a gift• Goal: entity towards which something
movesJohn went home
Mapping• It’s not enough to “know” (implicitly) what the structure
of a sentence is• We also have to know how to interpret the structure• So we need knowledge of thematic roles• Thematic roles are assigned in structural relations – e.g.
the Verb assigns a thematic role (usually Theme) to its complement
• Items in other positions get other thematic roles – Agent is usually in specifier position near the verb (sister to a higher projection)
• Some lexical items assign specific thematic roles – e.g. prepositions like by
Mapping
• This all becomes very important when we look at grammatical knowledge in aphasia
• Theta-roles: assignment of interpretive roles to syntactic objectssubject verb object Grammatical rolesJohn kissed Mary
Theta roles
• Non-canonical word order reliance on grammatical structure
object verb subjectJohn was kissed by Mary
• To be continued…..
Agent Patient
Agent?? Patient??