lausd school health and safety inspections...oehs school safety compliance checklist page 1 of 5...

32
Revised July 1, 2004 Office of Environmental Health and Safety 333 South Beaudry Avenue, 20 th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 241-3199 http://www.lausd-oehs.org LAUSD School Health and Safety Inspections In 2001, routine health and safety inspections were initiated in all District schools to assess compliance with Federal, State and District requirements. In 2003, a compliance checklist and scorecard were implemented to simplify the assessment process. The inspections and scorecard ratings are based on an assessment of compliance with 14 health and safety standards: accident prevention; asbestos management; fire/life safety; campus security; chemical safety; pest management; lead management; restroom facilities; indoor environment; maintenance & repairs; emergency preparedness; traffic & pedestrian safety; science lab safety; and safe school planning. Specific requirements for each of the standards are presented in the Safe School Inspection Guidebook, 04-15-02, which may be accessed at www.lausd-oehs.org . These requirements are summarized in the School Safety Compliance Checklist, 04-19-04 (Attachment 1). Inspection Process The Site Administrator (SA) is notified in writing of the planned inspection and asked to have relevant documentation available on the day of the inspection (Attachment 2). This is done to facilitate the compliance assessment process and ensure school staff are available to actively participate in the inspection. Two weeks prior to the inspection, the inspector reviews the complaint and incident history for the school (Attachment 3), as well as previous inspection findings and outstanding deficiencies. In addition, the inspector reviews Workers’ Compensation claims data to determine if the school has an elevated worker injury rate (Attachment 4). The inspection begins with a meeting between the inspector and SA, and is followed by a detailed inspection to assess compliance with the regulatory standards referenced in the Guidebook and Compliance Checklist . Following the inspection, an exit interview is conducted with the SA to review the findings and identify any items requiring immediate attention.

Upload: others

Post on 24-Oct-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Revised July 1, 2004

    Office of Environmental Health and Safety 333 South Beaudry Avenue, 20th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 241-3199 http://www.lausd-oehs.org

    LAUSD School Health and Safety Inspections

    In 2001, routine health and safety inspections were initiated in all District schools to assess compliance with Federal, State and District requirements. In 2003, a compliance checklist and scorecard were implemented to simplify the assessment process. The inspections and scorecard ratings are based on an assessment of compliance with 14 health and safety standards: accident prevention; asbestos management; fire/life safety; campus security; chemical safety; pest management; lead management; restroom facilities; indoor environment; maintenance & repairs; emergency preparedness; traffic & pedestrian safety; science lab safety; and safe school planning. Specific requirements for each of the standards are presented in the Safe School Inspection Guidebook, 04-15-02, which may be accessed at www.lausd-oehs.org. These requirements are summarized in the School Safety Compliance Checklist, 04-19-04 (Attachment 1). Inspection Process The Site Administrator (SA) is notified in writing of the planned inspection and asked to have relevant documentation available on the day of the inspection (Attachment 2). This is done to facilitate the compliance assessment process and ensure school staff are available to actively participate in the inspection. Two weeks prior to the inspection, the inspector reviews the complaint and incident history for the school (Attachment 3), as well as previous inspection findings and outstanding deficiencies. In addition, the inspector reviews Workers’ Compensation claims data to determine if the school has an elevated worker injury rate (Attachment 4). The inspection begins with a meeting between the inspector and SA, and is followed by a detailed inspection to assess compliance with the regulatory standards referenced in the Guidebook and Compliance Checklist. Following the inspection, an exit interview is conducted with the SA to review the findings and identify any items requiring immediate attention.

  • Revised July 1, 2004

    Corrective Action Notice and Compliance Scorecard During the inspection, the inspector records unsafe conditions and areas of noncompliance. A compliance score of 1 to 10 is assigned to each of the 14 standards in the Compliance Checklist. If all threshold criteria are met for a standard, a minimum score of 7 is given. If all threshold criteria are not met for a standard, the maximum allowable score is 6. Each score is then converted to a percentage, and assigned a value of 0 - 4 based on the following scale: 0% to 59% = 0; 60% to 69% = 1; 70% to 79% = 2; 80 to 89% = 3; 90% to 100% = 4. The “Scorecard Rating” (SR) is the average of the 14 values. An overall compliance rating of “Good”, “Fair” or “Poor” is assigned to each facility based on the following SR values: 0.00 - 1.49 = Poor; 1.50 - 2.49 = Fair; 2.50 - 4.00 = Good. The inspector also documents necessary corrective actions, and issues a Corrective Action Notice and Compliance Scorecard within 10 days of the inspection (Attachment 5 and 6). The Corrective Action Notice assigns a priority of 1 to 4 to each corrective action based on the severity of the finding. Compliance Assurance The SA is asked to return a copy of the Corrective Action Notice within 30 days indicating those items which have been corrected. Upon receipt, OEHS will update the compliance database and Scorecard Rating (SR). Any school that receives a SR of “Poor”, or a score of 50% or lower in any of the 14 areas will be scheduled for re-inspection within 90 days to verify compliance. To assist schools in achieving compliance, the inspector will meet every 6 weeks with the Local District Facilities Director, Operations Coordinator, and Central Maintenance and Operations, as necessary to review inspection findings and ensure appropriate District support is provided. OEHS will distribute quarterly Compliance Exception Reports to the Local Districts (Attachment 7) and central operating divisions. OEHS will track the percentage of schools rating “Good”, “Fair” and “Poor”, by local district, and District-wide on a quarterly basis (Attachment 8). For facilities with significantly elevated worker injury rates, OEHS and the Office of Risk Management and Insurance Services (ORMIS) will meet with school staff to develop a Corrective Action Plan aimed at reducing the frequency and severity of worker injuries. Availability of Inspection Reports Inspection reports and compliance scorecards are posted on the OEHS website http://www.lausd-oehs.org within 60 days of the inspection. Copies of inspection reports may also be requested from the OEHS Duty Officer at (213) 241-3199.

  • Attachment 1 School Safety Compliance Checklist

  • OEHS School Safety Compliance Checklist Page 1 of 5 Revised 04/19/04 OEHS File 2.5.6

    Office of Environmental Health & Safety Facility Inspection Program 333 S. Beaudry Avenue, 20th Floor Los Angeles, Ca 90017 Phone: (213) 241-3199 Fax: (213) 241-6816

    SCHOOL SAFETY COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST Los Angeles Unified School District

    Date: School: OEHS Inspector: Local District: Inspection ID:

    STANDARD EVALUATION Threshold Questions YES NO Is there a written IIPP, which is current, complete, and readily available? Is the IIPP summary page posted in a conspicuous area? Is employee training provided on a regular basis and documented? [Confer with school administration and review the available documentation.] Is there a designated School Safety Committee that meets quarterly? [Confer with school administration and review the available documentation.] Does the Safety Committee perform and document semi-annual safety inspections? Is there evidence of follow up action to deficiencies noted during inspections? [Review trouble call log.] Does the school's Claims Rate compare favorably with the District wide average? [Less than 120% of LAUSD average.] Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention]

    Accident Investigations Hazard Reporting New Employee Orientation Safety Inspections Enforcement/Discipline Personal Protective Equipment Safety Incentives OSHA Postings

    1. Accident Prevention

    Accident Reporting Others

    Notes: Score:

    Threshold Questions YES NO

    Is the Asbestos Management Plan kept in a designated location, readily available, and updated with the current 6-month and 3-year inspection results? [Check that the update is consistent with AHERA regulations.]

    Is there a procedure in place to a review the Asbestos Management Plan prior to disturbing potential asbestos containing materials? [Determine if Plant Manager has received 2-hour asbestos awareness training and if staff have been informed on the need to review the Asbestos Management Plan prior to disturbing any building material.]

    Is all work on asbestos -containing materials performed by properly trained personnel? [Evaluation should be based on staff interviews, field observations, and review of Contact Log.]

    Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention] VAT floors maintained Reporting of damaged ACBM Damage to ACBM Others

    2. Asbestos Management

    Notes: Score:

  • OEHS School Safety Compliance Checklist Page 2 of 5 Revised 04/19/04 OEHS File 2.5.6

    STANDARD EVALUATION Threshold Questions YES NO Are fire extinguishers checked monthly and serviced annually, clearly marked, and easily accessible? Are all exits and exit corridors free of obstructions? Are exits properly marked? Does each classroom equipped with security grilles have at least one with a releasable latch in compliance with District policy? [Per Board of Education Report #15.]

    Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention] Exit signs illuminated Exits unlocked & openable in single action Marked fire lane Occupant signs posted in assembly areas Fire extinguisher training Fire alarms tested weekly Posted emergency routes Flammable liquid storage

    3. Fire/Life Safety

    Emergency lighting Others

    Notes: Score:

    Threshold Questions YES NO Is the school perimeter secured with fencing in good condition & gates locked? Is there a visitor check in procedure in compliance with the Locked Campus Policy? [Per Bulletin 33.]

    Is there a written procedure for communicating classroom or play yard emergencies to the main office? [Review written procedure and assess overall staff awareness of procedure.]

    Is there adequate lighting for after school activ ities? Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention]

    Graffiti removed daily Discipline code Identification badges Secured food supply Crime reporting Exterior lighting Security signs Others

    4. Campus Security

    Notes: Score:

    Threshold Questions YES NO

    Is Hazard Communication training provided at time of initial assignment and when new hazards are introduced into the work place? [Confer with school administration and review the available documentation.]

    Is a chemical inventory kept in a designated location and readily available? Are MSDSs readily accessible for all chemicals listed on the inventory? [MSDSs should be kept in a centralized location known to all staff members] Are cleaners and other non-laboratory chemical products properly stored, secured, and disposed of? Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention]

    Personal Protective Equipment Gas cylinders secured Proper labeling & signs Emergency eyewash Grounding/Bonding Others Spill response kits

    5. Chemical Safety

    Notes: Score:

  • OEHS School Safety Compliance Checklist Page 3 of 5 Revised 04/19/04 OEHS File 2.5.6

    STANDARD EVALUATION Threshold Questions YES NO Is the site free of evidence of a continuing pest infestation? Is a copy of the District's IPM Handbook kept in a designated location and readily available? Are the necessary annual and 72-hour notifications of pesticide use provided? [Review available documentation.] Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention]

    Record keeping Approved pesticides Fly fans or screen doors Refuse bins Staff trained Others Posted approved pesticide list

    6. Pest Management

    Notes: Score:

    Threshold Questions YES NO Are buildings constructed prior to 1993 free of peeling or chalking paint? Has a trouble call been placed for areas of peeling or chalking paint? Are drinking fountains flushed daily and is a log maintained? [Per Bulletin 55.] Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention]

    Staff Awareness Others

    7. Lead Management

    Notes: Score:

    Threshold Questions YES NO Are all restrooms available for use; adequately stocked with toilet paper, soap, and paper towels; and maintained in sanitary condition? [Evaluation should be based on visual inspection and review of Contact Log.]

    Are restroom inspections conducted regularly? [At least twice daily] Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention]

    Adequate supervision Fixtures operating properly Restroom designation Adequate number of toilets/urinals Restroom ventilation Others

    8. Restroom Facilities

    Notes: Score:

    Threshold Questions YES NO

    Is the site free of evidence of potentially toxic or odorous emissions affecting the indoor environment? [Evaluation should be based on staff interviews, field observations, and review of Contact Log.]

    Are classrooms and offices adequately lighted? Are ventilation systems adequate & properly maintained? [Evaluation should be based on visual observations and interview of Plant Manager.] Are classrooms free of excessive noise? [Evaluation should be based on staff interviews, field observations, and review of Contact Log.] Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention]

    Evidence of mold Continuing or multiple IAQ complaints Housekeeping Objectionable odor Thermal comfort Others Excessive dust

    9. Indoor Environment

    Notes: Score:

  • OEHS School Safety Compliance Checklist Page 4 of 5 Revised 04/19/04 OEHS File 2.5.6

    STANDARD EVALUATION Threshold Questions YES NO Are facilities and equipment maintained in good repair? Have trouble calls been placed for necessary repairs? Are proper housekeeping practices followed in classrooms and on campus? Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention]

    Furniture Approved TV mounts

    Landscaping Hopper rooms

    Unapproved vegetation Salvage disposal

    Broken windows Fall/Trip hazard

    Seismic bracing Secured electrical equipment

    Machine guarding Others

    10. Maintenance & Repairs

    Carpet condition

    Notes: Score:

    Threshold Questions YES NO Is the "Safe School Plan" current and readily available? Are staff familiar with the SSP and their responsibilities?

    Does the "Safe School Plan" include procedures for: Violence Prevention, Emergency Preparedness, Crisis Intervention and Traffic & Pedestrian Safety? [Consider use of Model Plan]

    Does the Safe School Plan comply with CEC Section 212? Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention]

    Contact Information Prevention Programs School Planning Committee Crisis Intervention Training School Site Crisis Team Enforcement Programs Annual Safety Assessment Intervention Programs

    11. Safe School Plan

    Crisis Intervention Handbook (1994) Others

    Notes: Score:

    Threshold Questions YES NO Are emergency procedures current and readily available, and are staff familiar with their designated responsibilities? Is there an Emergency Response Plan that complies with regulatory requirements? [Review "emergency preparedness" section of the Safe School Plan and compare "emergency response procedures" to the Model Emergency Response Plan for Schools.]

    Are emergency supplies and equipment adequately stocked, properly maintained, and stored in designated locations? [Review supplies and equipment in earthquake bin and designation locations. Refer to supply inventory listed in Reference Guides 801 and 802]

    Is dedicated storage provided for emergency supplies? Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention]

    Adequate water supply (1.5 gal./pp) Emergency drills Emergency training Annual emergency hazard assessment First-aid kits (1/400) Designated command post Office to room communication Toilet and Search and Rescue Supplies

    12. Emergency Preparedness

    SEMS Others

    Notes: Score:

  • OEHS School Safety Compliance Checklist Page 5 of 5 Revised 04/19/04 OEHS File 2.5.6

    STANDARD EVALUATION Threshold Questions YES NO Have "Safe Routes" to school been designated? [Safe Routes should be posted and distributed to parents.] Are drop-off and pick-up points designated and supervised? [Drop-off and pick-up points should be posted and distributed to parents.] Are there recurring complaints, observed hazards, or a history of student injuries? [Evaluation should be based on staff interviews, field observations, and review of Contact Log and School Police accident records.]

    Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention] Annual meeting with traffic safety Crosswalks adequately marked

    Bi-annual with LAPD & School Police Traffic enforcement

    Accident reporting Others

    Adequate crossing guards

    13. Traffic & Pedestrian Safety

    Notes: Score:

    Threshold Questions YES NO Is the Chemical Hygiene Plan kept in a designated location, readily available and are staff aware of their responsibilities? Has a Chemical Safety Coordinator been assigned by the Principal? Is a laboratory chemical inventory kept in a designated location and readily available? Are MSDSs readily accessible for all chemicals listed on the inventory? [MSDSs should be kept in a centralized location known to all science staff.] Is safety equipment adequate, available, and maintained in good condition? Are laboratory chemicals properly stored, secured and disposed of? Are all laboratory chemicals used at the school District-approved? Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention]

    Incompatible storage Fume hoods CSC training Outdated chemicals Eyewash/showers Over-accumulation of regents Personal Protective Equipment Others

    14. Science Lab Safety

    Fire extinguishers

    Notes: Score:

    Threshold Questions YES NO Are off-site air emission sources affecting the school? Are off-site noise pollution sources affecting the school? Are there leaking transformers immediately adjacent to the school? Are industrial facilities adjacent or in close proximity to the school? [Please note facility location, type of operations, and business name (if known)] Are there multi-story buildings adjacent to the school? Other Factors: [mark factors requiring attention]

    Abandoned vehicles Dead animals Sidewalk hazards (holes, cracking, etc.) Traffic/pedestrian hazards Truck/bus idling Fire hazards Rubbish Hazardous materials

    15. Off-Site Issues

    Rodent infestation Others

    Notes:

  • Attachment 2 Sample Inspection Notification Letter

  • c: George Stewart, Complex Project Manager Arnold Giroux, Deputy Director, Office of Environmental Health & Safety Jay Golida, Associate General Counsel I, Office of Environmental Health and Safety Carlos Torres, Principal Safety Officer, Office of Environmental Health & Safety

    Los Angeles Unified School DistrictSuperintendent of SchoolsROY ROMER ANGELO J. BELLOMO

    Director of Environmental Health and Safety

    January 14, 2004

    Mr. Rodger Salkeld, PrincipalWebster Middle School11330 West Graham PlaceLos Angeles, CA 90064

    SUBJECT: UPCOMING SAFE SCHOOL INSPECTION

    The Office of Environmental Health and Safety (OEHS) is scheduled to conduct an inspection of your facility on February 19, 2004 to assess compliance with State, Federal and District regulations.

    To prepare for the inspection, we ask that you gather the following information for the inspector's review:

    a. a plot plan of the school siteb. any regulatory permits issued to the schoolc. Chemical Hygiene and Safety Plan (secondary school's only)d. a copy of the Hazard Communication Programe. availability of the Asbestos Management Planf. health and safety training recordsg. copies of your Safe School Plan and Emergency Planh. availability of the Integrated Pest Management Plan

    It will also be necessary for you to assign a member of your staff to accompany the OEHS Inspector during the inspection. The inspection will cover the areas referenced in the Safe School Inspection Guidebook, which may be downloaded at www.laschools.org/oehs. Following the inspection, you will be provided with a compliance checklist, Compliance Scorecard and a notice of any necessary corrective actions.

    We look forward to meeting with you on February 19, 2004. If you should have any questions in the interim, please do not hesitate to contact this office at (213) 241-3199.

    Sincerely,

    Joyce Washizaki

    333 S. Beaudry Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90017 - MAILING ADDRESS: Box 512298, Los Angeles, CA 90051 - Telephone (213) 241-3199 - Fax (213) 241-6816

  • Attachment 3 Sample Printout of Complaint and Incident History Report

  • Complaint and Incident HistoryWebster Middle School

    Date Range: None Specified

    Office of Environmental Health and Safety333 South Beaudry AvenueLos Angeles CA, 90017Phone: (213) 241-3199

    Call ID Caller NameCall TypeCall Date Call DescriptionCall Referred ToDateReferred

    Asbestos removal jobSiegel, Jeff.4/19/2004 Request for Information

    4865Habib, Nashat 4/19/2004

    Because they will house the 11 from students from McAllister, they are asking fro 1 WB and 1 FA kit

    Ordered!

    See Log# 4300

    Carter, Bruce2/20/2004 Request for Information

    4398-- 2/20/2004

    Site Administrators are concern for their safety at night, since the school has a lot of after school/night activities. Campus, parking lot and front of the school are very dim at night. Site needs an light survey.

    Assigned to Nashat Habib on 3/9/04 - JS

    Connelly, Marguerite1/6/2004 Complaint 4118Habib, Nashat 3/19/2004

    AP Adrian Ortega would like a bulletin or other written information regarding proper storage of a whiteboard cleaner that is found in the LAUSD Supply Catalog, and of rubbing alcohol which is used in the music classes to clean the recorders. A parent is requesting the information. He would like to discuss this issue with Senior Safety Officer Joyce Washizaki. FYI, Mr. Ortega states that he requested this information from an unknown male Duty Officer approx. 2 weeks ago and he never received a response.

    Ortega, Adrian2/14/2003 Request for Information

    2267Washizaki, Joyce 2/14/2003

    smells like burning electrical insulation in kitchen areaOrtega, Adrian2/7/2003 Complaint 2202Copeland, Victor 2/7/2003

    Galoustian, Greta5/1/2002 Request for Information

    588-- --

    Total Contact Items: 6

    July 26, 2004 Page 1

  • Attachment 4 Sample Workers’ Compensation Report

  • Dist School Type Loc Code School Name 00-01 01-02 02-03 3-Yr AvgFY 03-04 through

    April 3, 2004# Claims Costs ²

    3 ELEM 4712 KENTWOOD EL 50.46 34.05 37.39 40.63 41.14 10 $4,361.47

    3 ELEM 5507 98TH ST EL 12.28 47.87 55.20 38.45 17.97 3 $82,212.60

    3 ELEM 6260 RICHLAND EL 13.73 30.16 69.50 37.79 36.99 11 $14,436.72

    3 ELEM 6671 SHENANDOAH EL 30.38 36.98 31.04 32.80 5.16 2 $3,475.82

    3 ELEM 7603 WALGROVE EL 34.68 23.63 27.23 28.51 11.17 3 $9,824.98

    3 ELEM 2479 BRADDOCK DRIVE EL & Magnet 21.30 29.26 29.70 26.75 32.09 10 $120,832.65

    3 ELEM 3260 COWAN EL 24.83 25.83 28.05 26.24 19.75 5 $42,042.00

    3 MS 8493 WRIGHT MS & Magnet 25.90 23.14 24.22 24.42 13.51 7 $11,846.95

    3 ELEM 3123 CLOVER EL 34.17 10.19 27.92 24.09 4.52 1 $0.00

    3 ELEM 4397 HANCOCK PARK EL 43.96 12.87 15.08 23.97 0.00 0

    3 ELEM 6052 PASEO DEL REY NAT SC 30.17 7.40 26.28 21.28 10.09 2 $22,672.99

    3 ELEM 6952 STONER EL 15.69 27.25 16.60 19.85 13.69 4 $614.64

    3 MS 8038 BANCROFT MS & Magnet 19.16 18.15 21.85 19.72 12.38 7 $161,857.52

    3 ELEM 7849 WONDERLAND EL & Magnet 17.86 18.21 18.65 18.24 25.86 4 $19,605.94

    3 ELEM 3002 CHARNOCK ROAD EL 37.67 2.95 12.56 17.73 4.76 1 $16,297.83

    3 ELEM 2740 CANFIELD EL 23.41 6.57 22.85 17.61 30.34 7 $29,983.76

    3 ELEM 7425 VAN NESS EL 24.33 16.52 11.91 17.59 8.44 2 $0.00

    3 ELEM 5986 PALMS EL 6.29 15.07 31.31 17.55 0.00 0

    13.12 13.72 15.31 14.05 11.98 274 $1,528,468

    11.09 10.99 11.74 11.27 10.99 3,258 $20,730,157

    District 3 Schools (K-12) with Claims Rate 50% Higher than LAUSD Average ¹

    Local District D (68 facilities)LAUSD (580 facilities)

    Office of Environmental Health and SafetyFacility Inspection Program333 South Beaudry AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90017Phone: (213) 241-3199Fax: (213) 241-6816

    ¹ Schools with Claims Rate 50% greater than LAUSD 3-year average, i.e.: >16.91² Represents cost attributed to accidents that occurred during FY2003-04 including reserves for anticipated future costs. Does not include supplemental labor or continuing costs for accidents occuring in previous years.

  • Attachment 5 Sample Corrective Action Notice

  • c: George Stewart, Complex Project Manager Arnold Giroux, Deputy Director, Office of Environmental Health & Safety Jay Golida, Associate General Counsel I, Office of Environmental Health and Safety Carlos Torres, Principal Safety Officer, Office of Environmental Health & Safety

    Los Angeles Unified School DistrictSuperintendent of SchoolsROY ROMER ANGELO J. BELLOMO

    Director of Environmental Health and Safety

    April 7, 2004

    Mr. Rodger Salkeld, PrincipalWebster Middle School11330 West Graham PlaceLos Angeles, CA 90064

    SUBJECT: ROUTINE HEALTH AND SAFETY INSPECTION ON 02/19/04

    Dear Mr. Salkeld:

    We appreciate your assistance during our recent inspection of your facility. This inspection was conducted to assess your facility’s compliance with Federal, State, and District regulations.

    Enclosed is Corrective Action Notice 3362, which identifies several items requiring your attention by the dates indicated. The Site Administrator may return a copy of the Corrective Action Notice indicating those items which have been corrected. Upon receipt, OEHS will update the compliance database and Scorecard Rating (SR). Also attached is the Compliance Scorecard from this inspection, indicating an overall compliance rating of ''good'', ''fair'' or ''poor'', and a School Safety Compliance Checklist which may be used as a self-assessment tool.

    To assist with your review of the items indicated on the Notice, please refer to the Safe School Inspection Guidebook at www.laschools.org/oehs. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office.

    Sincerely,

    Joyce Washizaki

    Enclosures

    333 S. Beaudry Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90017 - MAILING ADDRESS: Box 512298, Los Angeles, CA 90051 - Telephone (213) 241-3199 - Fax (213) 241-6816

  • Corrective Action Notice

    Site Administrator:

    Address:

    Facility Type:Enrollment:District:

    Inspection Date:

    FacilityOEHS Representative: Inspection Type:

    02/19/04

    Middle School

    1388

    3

    Joyce Washizaki

    Mr. Rodger Salkeld

    Webster Middle School11330 West Graham PlaceLos Angeles CA 90064 Routine

    Complex Project Manager: George Stewart

    Inspection ID: 3362

    Office of Environmental Health and SafetyFacility Inspection Program333 South Beaudry AvenueLos Angeles CA, 90017Phone: (213) 241-3199

    The Site Administrator may return a copy of the Corrective Action Notice within 30 days indicating those items which have been corrected. Upon receipt, OEHS will update the compliance database and Scorecard Rating (SR).

    Standard Corrective ActionPriority Location(s) Due DatComment(s) Completion Date Signature

    Chemical Safety

    1 Do not use chemicals that have not been approved by OEHS. This is Deficiency ID: 49506.

    Lath house/green house (fish emulsion), tool room next to lath/green house (inside acid cabinet), storage room by healthy start (raid), room 139 (raid) & room 142 (and & roach killer under sink)

    ASAP -

    Chemical Safety

    1 Do not use chemicals that have not been approved by OEHS. This is Deficiency ID: 44762.

    ITD office (UNIsan) ASAPThis corrective action remains open from the Routine inspection (ID:2796) conducted on 07/24/03

    -

    Fire/Life Safety 1 Repair, cover or provide guardrails to ensure safety for holes in floors, sidewalks, or other walking surfaces. If necessary, place a trouble call to the Maintenance and Operations trouble call desk at (213) 763-2911. Refer to the assigned Deficiency ID. This is Deficiency ID: 49534.

    Front entry of school site ASAPUneven walking surface on sidewalk.

    -

    Fire/Life Safety 1 Utilize safety cans, flammable material cabinets or storage bunkers to store flammable materials. This is Deficiency ID: 44793.

    Storage for tools by lath house (weed wacker)

    ASAPProvide separate storage for gasoline-powered equipment from combustible materials. This corrective action remains open from the Routine inspection (ID:2796) conducted on 07/24/03

    -

    Fire/Life Safety 1 Provide at least one security grill with emergency breakaway capacity for classrooms equipped with security grills. Emergency breakaway window must be constructed of glass, located furthest from the exit door, and clearly identified as an emergency exit. If necessary, place a trouble call to the Maintenance and Operations trouble call desk at (213) 763-2911. Refer to the assigned Deficiency ID. This is Deficiency ID: 49533.

    Rooms B2, B4, B5 & B11 (remove paper and items in front window)

    ASAPRemove items blocking emergency exit window.

    -

    Corrective Action Notice - Routine Inspection at Webster Middle School Page 1 of 2

  • Standard Corrective ActionPriority Location(s) Due DatComment(s) Completion Date Signature

    Accident Prevention

    3 Ensure all employees are trained and made aware of IIPP. This is Deficiency ID: 27652.

    09/20/02This corrective action remains open from the Routine inspection (ID:1530) conducted on 08/05/02

    -

    Asbestos Management

    3 Contact ATU (213) 763-1450 to conduct 6 month visual surveillance of each building known or suspected to contain ACM. This is Deficiency ID: 44759.

    09/26/03Provide documentation. Last survey on file (8/8/03). This corrective action remains open from the Routine inspection (ID:2796) conducted on 07/24/03

    -

    OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY

    ___________________________________________

    Joyce Washizaki

    Corrective Action Notice - Routine Inspection at Webster Middle School Page 11 of 2

  • Attachment 6 Sample School Safety Compliance Scorecard

  • Facility: Webster Middle SchoolAddress: 11330 West Graham PlaceCity: Los Angeles State: CA Zip: 90064

    District: 3OEHS Inspector: Joyce Washizaki

    Inspection Date: February 19, 2004

    Accident Prevention

    Asbestos Management

    Fire/Life Safety

    Campus Security

    Chemical Safety

    Pest Management

    Lead Management

    Restroom Facilities

    Indoor Environment

    Maintenance and Repairs

    Safe School Plan

    Emergency Preparedness

    Traffic and Pedestrian Safety

    Science Lab Safety

    SR

    50

    60

    50

    80

    60

    90

    60

    60

    90

    80

    N/R

    60

    90

    50

    Standard Facility

    Facility Type: Middle School

    1.77

    54

    71

    51

    77

    54

    75

    62

    69

    69

    71

    55

    72

    54

    74

    55

    71

    64

    69

    70

    69

    N/R

    59

    76

    49

    N/R

    63

    70

    53

    LAUSD

    1.71 1.68

    Local District 3

    Compliance Scores (%)

    Scoring Method: A compliance score of 1 to 10 is assigned to each of the 14 standards in the Compliance Checklist. If all threshold criteria are met for a standard, a minimum score of 7 is given. If all threshold criteria are not met for a standard, the maximum allowable score is 6. Each score is then converted to a percentage and assigned a value of 0 - 4 based on the following scale: 0% to 59% = 0; 60% to 69% = 1; 70% to 79% = 2; 80 to 89% = 3; 90% to 100% = 4. The “Scorecard Rating” (SR) is the average of the 14 values. An overall compliance rating of “Good”, “Fair” or “Poor” is assigned to each facility based on the following SR values: 0.00 - 1.49 = Poor; 1.50 - 2.49 = Fair; 2.50 - 4.00 = Good.

    Site Administrator: Mr. Rodger Salkeld

    Health & Safety Compliance Scorecard

    N/R= Not Rated

    Office of Environmental Health and SafetyFacility Inspection Program333 South Beaudry AvenueLos Angeles CA, 90017Phone: (213) 241-3199

    Overall Compliance Rating FAIR FAIR FAIR

    Form 1f - Health & Safety Compliance Scorecard Summary - Webster Middle School

  • Attachment 7 Sample Compliance Exception Report

  • Inspection Findings By SchoolLocal District 3

    SchoolInspection

    Date

    Deficiencies

    TypeOpen Priority 1

    DeficienciesPriority 1 Other Total

    07/01/02 to 07/26/04

    Office of Environmental Health and SafetyFacility Inspection Program333 South Beaudry AvenueLos Angeles CA, 90017Phone: (213) 241-3199

    24th Street Early Education Center 12/6/2002 Routine 3 7 10 0

    24th Street Early Education Center 5/6/2004 Routine 0 6 6 0

    24th Street Elementary School 12/18/2002 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    24th Street Elementary School 4/3/2003 Routine 1 25 26 1

    24th Street Elementary School 7/15/2003 Complaint 2 7 9 2

    24th Street Elementary School 11/17/2003 Complaint 1 6 7 0

    24th Street Elementary School 2/11/2004 Routine 3 21 24 3

    3rd Street Elementary School 10/11/2002 Complaint 0 4 4 0

    3rd Street Elementary School 11/14/2002 Routine 8 16 24 7

    42nd Street Elementary School 2/5/2003 Routine 6 26 32 2

    42nd Street Elementary School 1/26/2004 Routine 4 18 22 4

    42nd Street Elementary School 5/26/2004 Routine 3 14 17 3

    54th Street Elementary School 3/27/2003 Complaint 1 4 5 1

    54th Street Elementary School 4/21/2003 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    54th Street Elementary School 6/4/2003 Complaint 0 4 4 0

    54th Street Elementary School 6/4/2003 Routine 6 21 27 6

    54th Street Elementary School 6/19/2003 Complaint 1 0 1 1

    59th Street Elemenary School 7/11/2002 Routine 2 33 35 1

    59th Street Elemenary School 2/26/2003 Routine 2 24 26 1

    59th Street Elemenary School 6/9/2004 Routine 0 1 1 0

    6th Ave Elementary School 10/18/2002 Routine 3 12 15 0

    6th Ave Elementary School 4/13/2004 Routine 2 9 11 2

    6th Avenue Early Education Center 10/23/2002 Routine 1 12 13 0

    6th Avenue Early Education Center 4/5/2004 Routine 1 7 8 1

    74th Street Elementary School 3/6/2003 Routine 5 21 26 2

    74th Street Elementary School 4/15/2003 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    74th Street Elementary School 11/24/2003 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    74th Street Elementary School 4/28/2004 Routine 1 7 8 1

    Alta Loma Elementary School 4/11/2003 Routine 3 26 29 0

    Alta Loma Elementary School 6/27/2003 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    Alta Loma Elementary School 8/11/2003 Complaint 0 8 8 0

    Alta Loma Elementary School 2/13/2004 Routine 4 18 22 4

    Angeles Mesa Elementary School 4/2/2003 Routine 5 12 17 2

    Angeles Mesa Elementary School 4/19/2004 Routine 0 12 12 0

    Arlington Heights Elementary School 8/15/2002 Routine 3 27 30 0

    Arlington Heights Elementary School 11/7/2002 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    07/26/04Page 1 of 8Table SIP2a- Inspection Findings by School- District 3

  • SchoolInspection

    Date

    Deficiencies

    Type Priority 1 Other TotalOpen Priority 1

    Deficiencies

    Arlington Heights Elementary School 4/24/2003 Routine 4 26 30 0

    Arlington Heights Elementary School 3/5/2004 Routine 0 1 1 0

    Audubon Middle School 3/27/2003 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Audubon Middle School 6/18/2003 Routine 6 31 37 1

    Audubon Middle School 3/8/2004 Routine 3 28 31 3

    Baldwin Hills Elementary School 9/27/2002 Routine 3 20 23 1

    Baldwin Hills Elementary School 1/23/2004 Routine 1 12 13 1

    Beethoven Early Education Center 2/21/2003 Routine 2 9 11 0

    Beethoven Early Education Center 4/7/2004 Routine 1 8 9 1

    Beethoven Street Elementary School 9/10/2002 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    Beethoven Street Elementary School 2/21/2003 Routine 4 26 30 2

    Beethoven Street Elementary School 3/20/2003 Complaint 0 4 4 0

    Beethoven Street Elementary School 4/22/2004 Routine 0 14 14 0

    Braddock Drive Elementary School 8/16/2002 Routine 5 43 48 0

    Braddock Drive Elementary School 5/22/2003 Routine 3 20 23 1

    Braddock Drive Elementary School 6/1/2004 Routine 1 3 4 1

    Bradley Charter Magnet School 1/28/2003 Routine 7 31 38 4

    Bradley Charter Magnet School 2/12/2003 Complaint 0 4 4 0

    Bradley Charter Magnet School 2/4/2004 Routine 3 5 8 3

    Brentwood Elementary School 7/25/2002 Routine 8 46 54 5

    Brentwood Elementary School 2/28/2003 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Brentwood Elementary School 3/24/2003 Routine 6 41 47 0

    Brentwood Elementary School 8/8/2003 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    Brentwood Elementary School 8/8/2003 Incident Response 1 6 7 0

    Brentwood Elementary School 10/28/2003 Complaint 0 5 5 0

    Brentwood Elementary School 12/3/2003 Complaint 0 5 5 0

    Brentwood Elementary School 2/26/2004 Routine 0 4 4 0

    Bright Elementary School 1/10/2003 Routine 2 10 12 1

    Bright Elementary School 5/20/2003 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    Bright Elementary School 4/29/2004 Routine 3 19 22 3

    Broadway Elementary School 8/12/2002 Routine 9 46 55 1

    Broadway Elementary School 12/11/2002 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    Broadway Elementary School 5/14/2003 Routine 5 23 28 5

    Broadway Elementary School 7/29/2003 Complaint 8 5 13 8

    Brockton Avenue Elementary School 12/10/2002 Routine 6 28 34 0

    Burroughs Middle School 9/11/2002 Routine 5 41 46 5

    Burroughs Middle School 5/5/2004 Incident Response 0 3 3 0

    Canfield Avenue Elementary School 2/20/2003 Routine 5 25 30 1

    Canfield Avenue Elementary School 9/17/2003 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    Canfield Avenue Elementary School 4/16/2004 Routine 2 11 13 2

    Canfield Avenue Elementary School 5/6/2004 Complaint 3 9 12 3

    Canyon Charter Elementary School 10/10/2002 Routine 1 20 21 1

    Castle Heights Elementary School 2/24/2003 Routine 2 28 30 1

    Charnock Road Elementary School 12/6/2002 Complaint 1 2 3 1

    Charnock Road Elementary School 1/21/2003 Routine 8 27 35 8

    Cheviot Hills High School 4/24/2003 Routine 1 9 10 0

    Cheviot Hills High School 1/12/2004 Incident Response 0 2 2 0

    07/26/04Page 2 of 8Table SIP2a- Inspection Findings by School- District 3

  • SchoolInspection

    Date

    Deficiencies

    Type Priority 1 Other TotalOpen Priority 1

    Deficiencies

    Cheviot Hills High School 1/29/2004 Routine 1 8 9 0

    Cienega Elementary School 2/19/2003 Routine 6 31 37 3

    Cienega Elementary School 2/11/2004 Routine 2 7 9 2

    Clover Avenue Elementary School 1/30/2003 Routine 5 28 33 0

    Clover Avenue Elementary School 2/26/2003 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Coeur D Alene Ave Elementary School 10/1/2002 Routine 5 21 26 2

    Coeur D Alene Ave Elementary School 11/13/2002 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    Coeur D Alene Ave Elementary School 12/4/2002 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    Coeur D Alene Ave Elementary School 6/4/2004 Routine 0 5 5 0

    Coliseum Street Elementary School 10/3/2002 Routine 3 21 24 2

    Coliseum Street Elementary School 4/26/2004 Routine 3 7 10 3

    Community Elementary School 1/15/2003 Complaint 1 4 5 0

    Community Elementary School 3/6/2003 Routine 6 35 41 4

    Community Elementary School 11/26/2003 Complaint 1 0 1 1

    Community Elementary School 1/23/2004 Routine 2 6 8 2

    Community Elementary School 3/19/2004 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    Cowan Avenue Elementary School 6/10/2003 Routine 4 20 24 4

    Cowan Avenue Elementary School 5/17/2004 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    Crenshaw High School 5/16/2003 Routine 4 34 38 2

    Crenshaw High School 3/12/2004 Routine 3 13 16 3

    Crenshaw High School 5/20/2004 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    Crenshaw High School 5/27/2004 Complaint 1 4 5 1

    Crescent Heights Blvd Early Education Center 3/5/2003 Complaint 1 0 1 1

    Crescent Heights Blvd Early Education Center 3/13/2003 Routine 2 8 10 0

    Crescent Heights Blvd Early Education Center 3/25/2004 Routine 0 5 5 0

    Crescent Heights Blvd Elementary School 2/6/2003 Routine 2 28 30 0

    Crescent Heights Blvd Elementary School 3/29/2004 Routine 3 9 12 3

    Del Rey High School 4/7/2003 Routine 3 11 14 0

    Del Rey High School 2/23/2004 Routine 3 12 15 3

    Dorsey High School 7/17/2002 Routine 5 48 53 3

    Dorsey High School 8/26/2002 Complaint 1 5 6 0

    Dorsey High School 9/16/2002 Incident Response 1 4 5 0

    Dorsey High School 7/16/2003 Routine 7 34 41 1

    Dorsey High School 2/26/2004 Routine 8 48 56 6

    Emerson Adult School 2/12/2003 Routine 4 21 25 1

    Emerson Adult School 2/18/2004 Routine 6 26 32 6

    Emerson Middle School 7/8/2002 Routine 10 53 63 1

    Emerson Middle School 4/21/2003 Incident Response 1 1 2 0

    Emerson Middle School 5/20/2003 Routine 5 43 48 1

    Emerson Middle School 9/17/2003 Complaint 3 1 4 0

    Emerson Middle School 1/22/2004 Routine 3 29 32 3

    Emerson Middle School 2/24/2004 Complaint 2 5 7 2

    Fairburn Avenue Elementary School 7/30/2002 Routine 8 41 49 4

    Fairburn Avenue Elementary School 2/4/2003 Routine 3 33 36 1

    Fairburn Avenue Elementary School 4/8/2003 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Fairburn Avenue Elementary School 1/26/2004 Routine 2 10 12 2

    Grand View Blvd Elementary School 10/15/2002 Routine 7 31 38 2

    07/26/04Page 3 of 8Table SIP2a- Inspection Findings by School- District 3

  • SchoolInspection

    Date

    Deficiencies

    Type Priority 1 Other TotalOpen Priority 1

    Deficiencies

    Grand View Blvd Elementary School 2/26/2004 Routine 2 7 9 2

    Hamilton High School 8/12/2002 Incident Response 1 5 6 0

    Hamilton High School 1/27/2003 Incident Response 1 2 3 0

    Hamilton High School 6/30/2003 Routine 11 53 64 5

    Hamilton High School 8/4/2003 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Hamilton High School 8/11/2003 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Hamilton High School 11/18/2003 Incident Response 0 3 3 0

    Hamilton High School 1/8/2004 Complaint 3 0 3 0

    Hamilton High School 3/17/2004 Routine 7 28 35 7

    Hamilton High School 4/5/2004 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    Hamilton High School 4/6/2004 Incident Response 7 29 36 7

    Hamilton High School 4/21/2004 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    Hillcrest Drive Elementary School 10/31/2002 Routine 3 34 37 1

    Hillcrest Drive Elementary School 1/30/2004 Routine 4 14 18 3

    Hillcrest Drive Elementary School 5/24/2004 Routine 2 10 12 2

    Hobart Blvd Early Education Center 2/11/2003 Routine 0 10 10 0

    Hobart Blvd Elementary School 4/2/2003 Routine 2 9 11 0

    Hobart Blvd Elementary School 2/12/2004 Routine 3 27 30 3

    Hobart Blvd Elementary School 4/8/2004 Complaint 0 5 5 0

    Hyde Park Blvd Elementary School 4/16/2003 Routine 5 26 31 1

    Hyde Park Blvd Elementary School 6/25/2003 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Hyde Park Blvd Elementary School 2/18/2004 Routine 1 4 5 1

    Hyde Park Early Education Center 2/28/2003 Routine 1 17 18 0

    Hyde Park Early Education Center 2/18/2004 Routine 0 2 2 0

    Indian Springs High School 7/31/2002 Routine 1 22 23 0

    Indian Springs High School 4/22/2003 Routine 4 20 24 1

    Indian Springs High School 6/16/2004 Routine 0 2 2 0

    Kenter Canyon Elementary School 10/24/2002 Routine 5 28 33 5

    Kentwood Early Education Center 12/2/2002 Routine 1 9 10 0

    Kentwood Early Education Center 3/3/2003 Complaint 1 0 1 1

    Kentwood Early Education Center 4/26/2004 Routine 2 9 11 2

    Kentwood Elementary School 12/2/2002 Routine 8 31 39 7

    Local District G 5/27/2004 Complaint 1 3 4 1

    Los Angeles Center for Enriched Studies 8/25/2003 Routine 6 38 44 2

    Los Angeles Center for Enriched Studies 1/20/2004 Routine 6 35 41 6

    Los Angeles Center for Enriched Studies 4/23/2004 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Los Angeles Elementary School 6/25/2003 Routine 2 20 22 0

    Los Angeles High School 9/25/2002 Routine 7 43 50 2

    Los Angeles High School 10/3/2002 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Los Angeles High School 3/10/2003 Incident Response 0 1 1 0

    Los Angeles High School 10/7/2003 Complaint 1 3 4 0

    Los Angeles High School 11/13/2003 Routine 4 23 27 3

    Los Angeles High School 12/3/2003 Incident Response 0 2 2 0

    Los Angeles High School 3/18/2004 Complaint 0 4 4 0

    Los Angeles Technology Center 3/27/2003 Routine 1 18 19 1

    Los Angeles Technology Center 2/10/2004 Routine 4 10 14 4

    Loyola Village Elementary School 10/14/2002 Routine 6 24 30 0

    07/26/04Page 4 of 8Table SIP2a- Inspection Findings by School- District 3

  • SchoolInspection

    Date

    Deficiencies

    Type Priority 1 Other TotalOpen Priority 1

    Deficiencies

    Mann Middle School 3/8/2003 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Mann Middle School 9/16/2003 Routine 5 23 28 2

    Mann Middle School 5/4/2004 Routine 0 3 3 0

    Mann Middle School 5/26/2004 Complaint 2 0 2 2

    Mar Vista Elementary School 10/29/2002 Routine 5 30 35 1

    Mar Vista Elementary School 5/12/2004 Routine 1 9 10 1

    Marina Del Rey Middle School 8/23/2002 Routine 9 59 68 3

    Marina Del Rey Middle School 9/4/2002 Complaint 0 4 4 0

    Marina Del Rey Middle School 4/1/2003 Routine 7 41 48 1

    Marina Del Rey Middle School 2/12/2004 Routine 8 39 47 8

    Marina Del Rey Middle School 3/26/2004 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    Marina Del Rey Middle School 4/6/2004 Complaint 2 8 10 2

    Marlton Elementary School 12/3/2002 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Marlton Elementary School 1/30/2003 Routine 3 25 28 1

    Marlton Elementary School 11/14/2003 Complaint 4 5 9 1

    Marlton Elementary School 1/27/2004 Routine 3 4 7 3

    Marlton Elementary School 5/3/2004 Complaint 0 7 7 0

    Marquez Elementary School 11/22/2002 Routine 2 28 30 0

    Marquez Elementary School 3/30/2004 Routine 3 10 13 3

    Marvin Avenue Early Education Center 7/30/2003 Routine 0 16 16 0

    Marvin Avenue Early Education Center 6/14/2004 Routine 0 8 8 0

    Marvin Avenue Elementary School 12/19/2002 Routine 6 25 31 0

    McBride Special Ed Center 5/5/2003 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    McBride Special Ed Center 5/27/2003 Routine 2 20 22 2

    Mid City Magnet School 1/14/2003 Routine 5 21 26 2

    Mid City Magnet School 1/30/2004 Routine 0 6 6 0

    Mount Vernon Middle School 1/8/2003 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    Mount Vernon Middle School 2/18/2003 Routine 9 24 33 2

    Mount Vernon Middle School 1/29/2004 Routine 4 15 19 4

    Open Charter Magnet School 8/15/2002 Routine 5 43 48 0

    Open Charter Magnet School 6/1/2003 Routine 3 20 23 3

    Overland Avenue Elementary School 1/28/2003 Complaint 1 0 1 1

    Overland Avenue Elementary School 2/18/2003 Routine 3 25 28 1

    Overland Avenue Elementary School 4/22/2004 Routine 3 27 30 3

    Overland Avenue Elementary School 4/23/2004 Complaint 1 5 6 1

    Owens Opportunity Unit School 1/25/2003 Routine 0 9 9 0

    Owens Opportunity Unit School 4/23/2004 Routine 2 0 2 2

    Pacific Palisades Elementary School 1/23/2003 Routine 4 18 22 1

    Pacific Palisades Elementary School 3/25/2004 Routine 5 29 34 5

    Palisades Charter High School 10/9/2002 Routine 5 31 36 0

    Palisades Charter High School 10/23/2002 Complaint 3 4 7 0

    Palisades Charter High School 1/27/2003 Complaint 3 14 17 0

    Palisades Charter High School 3/12/2004 Complaint 1 0 1 1

    Palms Elementary School 2/11/2003 Routine 2 19 21 2

    Palms Middle School 7/9/2002 Routine 9 65 74 3

    Palms Middle School 9/17/2002 Incident Response 0 1 1 0

    Palms Middle School 9/25/2002 Incident Response 0 2 2 0

    07/26/04Page 5 of 8Table SIP2a- Inspection Findings by School- District 3

  • SchoolInspection

    Date

    Deficiencies

    Type Priority 1 Other TotalOpen Priority 1

    Deficiencies

    Palms Middle School 10/21/2002 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    Palms Middle School 12/3/2002 Complaint 1 3 4 0

    Palms Middle School 6/19/2003 Incident Response 0 1 1 0

    Palms Middle School 8/19/2003 Routine 10 42 52 10

    Palms Middle School 6/4/2004 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Paseo Del Rey Natural Science Magnet 4/9/2003 Routine 2 18 20 0

    Paseo Del Rey Natural Science Magnet 3/22/2004 Complaint 1 5 6 0

    Paseo Del Rey Natural Science Magnet 4/20/2004 Routine 2 19 21 2

    Phoenix High School 6/3/2003 Routine 3 21 24 2

    Phoenix High School 3/24/2004 Routine 0 4 4 0

    Pio Pico Elementary School 11/13/2002 Routine 7 36 43 3

    Pio Pico Elementary School 2/18/2003 Complaint 0 4 4 0

    Pio Pico Elementary School 11/25/2003 Routine 3 8 11 2

    Pio Pico Elementary School 2/27/2004 Complaint 1 1 2 1

    Pio Pico Elementary School 2/27/2004 Incident Response 1 1 2 1

    Pio Pico Elementary School 4/12/2004 Routine 4 18 22 4

    Playa Del Rey Elementary School 11/14/2002 Routine 2 20 22 1

    Queen Anne Early Education Center 2/21/2003 Routine 0 8 8 0

    Queen Anne Early Education Center 5/7/2004 Routine 1 4 5 1

    Queen Anne Place Elementary School 2/21/2003 Routine 1 19 20 0

    Queen Anne Place Elementary School 2/14/2004 Routine 0 14 14 0

    Revere Charter Middle School 11/6/2002 Routine 5 33 38 0

    Revere Charter Middle School 10/1/2003 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Revere Charter Middle School 1/12/2004 Complaint 0 4 4 0

    Richland Avenue Elementary School 3/31/2003 Routine 5 35 40 4

    Richland Avenue Elementary School 12/3/2003 Complaint 1 4 5 1

    Richland Avenue Elementary School 2/3/2004 Routine 6 24 30 6

    Roscomare Road Elemantary School 7/3/2002 Routine 3 43 46 0

    Roscomare Road Elemantary School 3/13/2003 Routine 3 27 30 0

    Saturn Street Elementary School 10/2/2002 Routine 3 27 30 1

    Saturn Street Elementary School 12/4/2002 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    Saturn Street Elementary School 5/2/2003 Complaint 0 4 4 0

    Saturn Street Elementary School 12/3/2003 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    Saturn Street Elementary School 2/4/2004 Routine 0 1 1 0

    Shenandoah St Early Education Center 3/27/2003 Routine 0 10 10 0

    Shenandoah St Early Education Center 4/6/2004 Routine 1 8 9 1

    Shenandoah Street Elementary School 2/27/2003 Routine 5 36 41 2

    Shenandoah Street Elementary School 8/11/2003 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Shenandoah Street Elementary School 4/14/2004 Routine 6 25 31 6

    Short Avenue Elementary School 11/26/2002 Routine 7 31 38 7

    Sterry Early Education Center 7/3/2002 Routine 2 24 26 0

    Sterry Early Education Center 5/7/2003 Routine 1 8 9 0

    Sterry Elementary School 3/25/2003 Routine 3 22 25 3

    Sterry Elementary School 10/17/2003 Complaint 1 4 5 1

    Stoner Avenue Elementary School 12/16/2002 Routine 6 30 36 6

    Stoner Avenue Elementary School 11/24/2003 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    Stoner Avenue Elementary School 1/28/2004 Complaint 2 6 8 2

    07/26/04Page 6 of 8Table SIP2a- Inspection Findings by School- District 3

  • SchoolInspection

    Date

    Deficiencies

    Type Priority 1 Other TotalOpen Priority 1

    Deficiencies

    Temescal Canyon High School 3/21/2003 Routine 3 20 23 2

    Temescal Canyon High School 3/24/2004 Routine 1 5 6 1

    Topanga Elementary School 6/4/2003 Routine 4 32 36 3

    Twain Middle School 8/11/2003 Routine 5 47 52 1

    Twain Middle School 2/10/2004 Routine 4 34 38 4

    Twain Middle School 2/10/2004 Complaint 1 3 4 1

    Twain Middle School 2/10/2004 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Twain Middle School 3/23/2004 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    University High School 7/30/2002 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    University High School 8/23/2002 Complaint 5 22 27 3

    University High School 9/23/2002 Incident Response 1 2 3 0

    University High School 11/7/2002 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    University High School 11/7/2002 Complaint 0 8 8 0

    University High School 2/20/2003 Complaint 1 1 2 0

    University High School 2/20/2003 Complaint 3 8 11 0

    University High School 6/12/2003 Complaint 2 4 6 0

    University High School 6/13/2003 Complaint 0 5 5 0

    University High School 7/30/2003 Routine 12 61 73 9

    University High School 9/23/2003 Complaint 0 5 5 0

    University High School 3/22/2004 Routine 12 44 56 12

    Venice High School 8/21/2002 Complaint 0 4 4 0

    Venice High School 1/9/2003 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    Venice High School 5/13/2003 Routine 12 62 74 6

    Venice High School 11/12/2003 Incident Response 0 1 1 0

    Venice High School 11/12/2003 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    Venice High School 12/12/2003 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    Venice High School 3/3/2004 Incident Response 2 5 7 1

    Venice High School 3/5/2004 Routine 10 50 60 10

    View Park High School 7/24/2002 Routine 4 21 25 1

    View Park High School 2/19/2003 Routine 3 22 25 0

    View Park High School 2/5/2004 Routine 0 2 2 0

    View Park Preparatory Charter School 8/27/2002 Routine 1 19 20 1

    View Park Preparatory Charter School 3/28/2003 Routine 2 18 20 2

    Virginia Road Elementary School 2/3/2003 Routine 4 27 31 1

    Virginia Road Elementary School 1/27/2004 Routine 1 5 6 1

    Walgrove Avenue Elementary School 1/7/2003 Routine 6 29 35 0

    Walgrove Avenue Elementary School 10/9/2003 Complaint 0 1 1 0

    Walgrove Avenue Elementary School 4/8/2004 Routine 2 16 18 2

    Warner Avenue Elementary School 4/8/2003 Routine 3 26 29 1

    Warner Avenue Elementary School 2/4/2004 Routine 2 18 20 2

    Webster Middle School 8/5/2002 Routine 5 44 49 0

    Webster Middle School 7/24/2003 Routine 6 35 41 3

    Webster Middle School 2/19/2004 Routine 6 36 42 6

    Webster Middle School 3/19/2004 Complaint 0 2 2 0

    Weemes Elementary School 4/3/2003 Routine 5 23 28 0

    Weemes Elementary School 8/20/2003 Complaint 1 0 1 1

    Weemes Elementary School 2/9/2004 Routine 0 4 4 0

    07/26/04Page 7 of 8Table SIP2a- Inspection Findings by School- District 3

  • SchoolInspection

    Date

    Deficiencies

    Type Priority 1 Other TotalOpen Priority 1

    Deficiencies

    Weemes Elementary School 5/27/2004 Routine 5 0 5 5

    Westchester High School 4/7/2003 Routine 12 50 62 5

    Westchester High School 10/28/2003 Complaint 0 5 5 0

    Westchester High School 2/23/2004 Complaint 0 5 5 0

    Westchester High School 3/18/2004 Routine 11 35 46 11

    Westchester High School 4/7/2004 Complaint 1 2 3 1

    Western Avenue Charter School 11/15/2002 Complaint 1 1 2 0

    Western Avenue Charter School 12/4/2002 Complaint 1 0 1 0

    Western Avenue Charter School 6/11/2003 Routine 7 22 29 3

    Western Avenue Charter School 3/3/2004 Routine 2 2 4 2

    Westminster Ave Early Education Center 2/13/2003 Routine 0 7 7 0

    Westminster Avenue Elementary School 2/13/2003 Routine 3 30 33 2

    Westminster Avenue Elementary School 6/8/2004 Routine 2 26 28 2

    Westport Heights Elementary School 12/9/2002 Routine 6 27 33 0

    Westside Leadership Magnet 7/31/2002 Routine 9 37 46 0

    Westside Leadership Magnet 2/5/2003 Routine 3 26 29 2

    Westwood Charter Elementary School 3/12/2003 Routine 7 32 39 2

    Westwood Charter Elementary School 4/19/2004 Routine 2 19 21 2

    Widney High School 3/10/2003 Complaint 0 7 7 0

    Widney High School 8/26/2003 Routine 3 20 23 3

    Wilshire Crest Elementary School 9/27/2002 Complaint 1 1 2 1

    Wilshire Crest Elementary School 3/10/2003 Routine 4 18 22 0

    Wilton Place Early Educaton Center 2/26/2003 Routine 0 2 2 0

    Wilton Place Elementary School 2/26/2003 Routine 2 21 23 1

    Wilton Place Elementary School 2/6/2004 Routine 2 7 9 2

    Windsor Hills Elementary School 10/7/2002 Complaint 1 8 9 1

    Windsor Hills Elementary School 1/17/2003 Routine 3 32 35 0

    Windsor Hills Elementary School 6/28/2004 Complaint 0 3 3 0

    Wright Middle School 4/23/2003 Routine 9 37 46 3

    Wright Middle School 2/5/2004 Routine 6 33 39 6

    Young High School 2/28/2003 Routine 1 22 23 0

    Young High School 5/5/2004 Routine 0 4 4 0

    499Total: 61855283902

    07/26/04Page 8 of 8Table SIP2a- Inspection Findings by School- District 3

  • Attachment 8 Overall Compliance Ratings by Local District

  • Percent of Schools Rated Good, Fair and Poor - by District 10/25/2004

    School Health & Safety Compliance Scorecard Ratings

    Percent of LAUSD Schools Rated Good, Fair & Poor(By Local District and Division)

    10/14/04

    36%

    22%

    15%10%

    3%

    11%

    2%

    7%

    14%

    27%

    39%

    74% 74%

    86% 88%

    39%

    81% 81%

    68%

    61%62%61%

    1%3%

    11%

    3%

    9%

    27%

    59%

    12%

    5% 5%0%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Adult Education Early Education Special Education

    Good % Fair % Poor %

    Facility Inspection ProgramOffice of Environmental Health and Safety333 South Beaudry AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90017Phone: (213) 241-3199Fax: (213) 241-6816

  • Percent of LAUSD Schools Rated Good, Fair Poor By Quarter10/25/2004

    School Health & Safety Compliance Scorecard Ratings

    Percent of LAUSD Schools Rated Good, Fair & Poor By QuarterJuly 2003 to October 20041

    3% 4% 4%

    17%

    59%62%

    84%89%

    72%

    2%

    9%

    76%

    7%11%

    39%35%

    20%

    7%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    July - 2003 October - 2003 January - 2004 April - 2004 July - 2004 October - 2004

    Good Fair Poor

    Facility Inspection ProgramOffice of Environmental Health and Safety333 South Beaudry AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90017Phone: (213) 241-3199Fax: (213) 241-6816

    Note: LAUSD schools are inspected annually to assess compliance with health and safety standards in the following areas: accident prevention; asbestos management; fire/lifesafety; campus security; chemical safety; pest management; lead management; restroom facilities; indoor environment; maintenance & repairs; emergency preparedness; traffic &pedestrian safety; science lab safety; and safe school planning. Following each inspection, a Compliance Scorecard and Corrective Action Notice (CAN) are issued to the SiteAdministrator. The Scorecard Rating is derived using the School Safety Compliance Checklist (04/19/04). Copies of the School Safety Compliance Checklist , inspection reports andCompliance Scorecards may be downloaded at www.lausd-oehs.org or requested from the OEHS Duty Officer at (213) 241-3199.

    1 As of 10/14/04