lean thinking and six sigma at the level of clinical ...mrsaactionuk.net/hugh_rogers1.pdf · lean...

12
1 Hugh Rogers FRCS Associate, Service Transformation NHS Institute for Innovation & Improvement Healthcare Events 26 th February 2008 Lean thinking and Six sigma at the level of Clinical Service Delivery Don’t worry about the jargon! Evolution of Quality Improvement W Shewhart – Statistical Process Control W E Deming – System of Profound Knowledge Juran Toyota Taichi Ohno Goldratt 1920’s 1950’s Toyota Production System ‘Lean thinking’ Motorola & 6 Sigma Theory of Constraints 2008 ‘Lean 6 Sigma’ TQM BPR

Upload: vuonghuong

Post on 19-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Hugh Rogers FRCSAssociate, Service Transformation

NHS Institute for Innovation & Improvement

Healthcare Events26th February 2008

Lean thinking and Six sigma at the level of

Clinical Service Delivery

Don’t worry about the jargon!

Evolution of Quality Improvement

W Shewhart – Statistical Process Control

W E Deming – System of Profound Knowledge

JuranToyota

Taichi Ohno

Goldratt

1920’s

1950’s

Toyota Production System

‘Lean thinking’

Motorola &

6 SigmaTheory of

Constraints

2008‘Lean 6 Sigma’

TQM

BPR

2

Six Sigma

• Focuses on improving processes by reducing variation and minimising error

• Uses a systematic approach: DMAIC

• Relies heavily on statistical methods

• Emphasises ‘Voice of the Customer’

• Works best where there is a clear process to be improved

IMPROVEDEFFECTIVENESSDEFINE IMPROVE CONTROLMEASURE ANALYZE

Focus on Variation

Natural variation

Inevitable characteristic

of any healthcare system

Variation in patient

characteristics

Take steps to manage it

Artificial variation

Created by the way the

system is managed

Variation in the way the

service is provided

Take steps to eliminate it

© NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement 2006

Applying systems thinking to mortality:

Crude weekly deaths on SPC chart

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

31/1

2/2

001

31/0

1/2

002

28/0

2/2

002

31/0

3/2

002

30/0

4/2

002

31/0

5/2

002

30/0

6/2

002

31/0

7/2

002

31/0

8/2

002

30/0

9/2

002

31/1

0/2

002

30/1

1/2

002

31/1

2/2

002

31/0

1/2

003

28/0

2/2

003

31/0

3/2

003

30/0

4/2

003

31/0

5/2

003

30/0

6/2

003

31/0

7/2

003

31/0

8/2

003

30/0

9/2

003

31/1

0/2

003

30/1

1/2

003

31/1

2/2

003

31/0

1/2

004

29/0

2/2

004

31/0

3/2

004

UCL Median W eekly deaths LCL

3

Six sigma core tools

• DMAIC

• SPC

• Voice of the Customer

• Analysis of variance

• Balanced scorecards

• Process management

• Continuous improvement

• Design of experiments“Six sigma has not been widely

applied to patient care”

Revere 2004

Some Criticisms of Six sigma

• Systems interactions not considered – uncoordinated projects

• Lack of consideration of human factors

• Significant infrastructure investment required

• Over detailed and complicated for some issues

• The goal (6Σ = 3.4 defects per million) is not always appropriate

Lean Sigma: some basic concepts

H Bevan et al, 2006: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement

We spend 75-95% of our time doing things that increase our costs -

and create no value for the customer

What is Lean?

Lean is the process of identifying the least wasteful way to provide value (better, safer care, with no unnecessary delays at lower cost) to our customers.

Value must always be determined by the customer

What is value? Who is the customer?

4

Lean – focuses on dramatically improving flow in

the ‘value stream’ and eliminating waste

IMPROVEDEFFICIENCY AND

SPEED

SPECIFY VALUE

PULL PERFECTIONPERFECTIONUNDERSTAND UNDERSTAND

DEMANDFLOW

Lean Sigma –complementary not competing

Value Stream Mapping

Visual workplace/5s

Work standardisation

Staff involvement

Match resources to demand

Pull signals

Rapid Improvement Events

LEAN TOOLS/PRINCIPLES

© NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement

Multi functional staff

Lean thinking:7 wastes

• Overproduction

• Waiting

• Transport

• Inappropriate processing

• Unnecessary Inventory

• Unnecessary motion

• Defects

What does this mean for healthcare??

5

Direct Care Time

Motion Admin Discussion Handovers OtherOther

The Productive Ward: releasing time to care

Reducing wastesReducing wastes

Opportunity to increase safety and reliability of

care

Role

Tim

e (

e.g

. nurs

e)

Total Time

Sort

Straighten/Simplify (Set in order)

Shine

Standardise

Sustain

5 S standards

Not Used

Sustain the gains

1 2 3 4 5

5S

5s work in the sluice ….

reduced the distance travelled to collect commodes and dispose waste on return

reduced time spent in fetching commode as they are now ‘ready to go’

Wipes near sluice puts all needed items together

6

There were some surprises!

BEFORE LEAN

AFTER LEAN

What changes can we make that will

result in improvement?

1. Pay attention to patients’ wants and needs

2. Improve flow and reduce delays

3. Organise your workplace

4. Improve the safety & reliability of care

What are we trying toWhat are we trying toaccomplish?accomplish?

How will we know that aHow will we know that achange is an improvement?change is an improvement?

What changes can we make that willWhat changes can we make that willresult in the improvements we seek result in the improvements we seek

??

Act Plan

Study Do

What is reliability?

The capacity to perform a given function under given conditions for a specified period of time

A reliable health care system is one that is designed to ensure that every patient consistently receives evidence-based, effective care every time he or she needs it

� “Reliability means keeping a promise” (Don Berwick)

7

Compare Reliability and Safety

SafetyErrors of commission

Special cause strategies

Reactive

Focused projects

ReliabilityErrors of omission

Common cause strategies

Proactive

Design of reliable systems

High frequency low impact Low frequency high impact

OverlapFailure has high impact

Increasing Reliability of Clinical Observations

Mortality Project Improvement All observations 'complete'

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Jan-

04

Feb-

04

Mar

-04

Apr

-04

May

-04

Jun-

04

Jul-0

4

Aug

-04

Sep

-04

Oct-0

4

Nov

-04

Dec

-04

Jan-

05

Feb-

05

Mar

-05

Apr

-05

May

-05

Jun-

05

Jul-0

5

Aug

-05

Sep

-05

Oct-0

5

Nov

-05

Dec

-05

Jan-

06

Feb-

06

Mar

-06

Apr

-06

May

-06

Jun-

06

Jul-0

6

20

sets

of

no

tes r

ev

iew

ed

ea

ch

mo

nth

First step in a system to retrieve the deteriorating patient:

• Recognise

• Report

• Respond

Example 1Increase the reliability of therapeutic interventions

through a “care bundle” approach

Example for reducing ventilator associated pneumonia:

– Elevating the head of the bed >30o (Drakulovic 1999)

– DVT prophylaxis (Cook et al 2001)

– Peptic ulcer prophylaxis (Yang & Lewis 2003)

– Managing sedation effectively with sedation Holds (Kress 2000)

– Tight Control of Blood glucose 4.4-6.1 mils (Van den Berghe 2001)

Can be applied to

• Surgical site infection

• Central line management

• Myocardial Infarction

• etc etc

8

Defect rates in Healthcare

The latest large study in US health care (McGlynn,et al The quality of healthcare delivered to adults in

the United States NEJM 2003; 348) concluded thatthe “defect rate” in the technical quality of Americanhealthcare is approximately 45%.

© NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement

Reliable Care Reduces Complications

also reduces length of stay and readmissions

Reliable Care Lowers Mortality Rates

9

Succeed

- Experts produce final product

- Takes 2 years

- No changes allowed

- Measure before and after

- No new learning

- Experts produce draft for testing

- Takes 2 hours

- Changes are expected

- Measurement over time

- Continuous learning and improvement

Standardisation:

Fail

Financial Realism & transparent accountability

Clinical purism &

Opaque accountabilityMedicine, management, and modernisation; a “danse macabre”?

Pieter Degeling et al BMJ 2003;326:649-652

Sys

tem

atised

conceptions o

f clin

ical w

ork

Nurse

clinicians

Nurse

managersMedical

clinicians

General

managersMedical

managers

Indiv

idualis

t conceptio

ns o

f clin

ical w

ork

10

Level 1 Reliability Personal Intent, Vigilance and

Hard Work:(80% to 95 % success)

Feedback of information on compliance

Awareness and training

Personal check lists

Common equipment, standard order sheets

Level 2 Reliability Reliability Science, System design

and Human Factors (95% to 99.5% success)

Standardise processes

Make the desired action the default

“Opt-out” – The desired action = flow of work

Build design aids into the system

Create redundancies and time lapses

Principles for increasing reliability

Length of Stay and MortalityWest Middlesex Hospital

Weekly average LOS

Monthly HSMR

11

Synergy for quality:

Quality care

Reliability

Lean & Flow

Safety & Mortality

High quality error free care is the most cost-effective

“A key function of hospitals is to save lives, so it’s surprising how little attention is paid to hospital mortality. Our work in Bradford shows that

a hospital mortality reduction programme can make a big impact by significantly reducing mortality. It’s a natural top priority.” John Wright, Clinical Director, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Trust

Learning from death: a hospital mortality reduction programme Wright J et al. J R Soc Med 2006;99:04-20.1-6

Bradford calendar year hsmrs

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

HS

MR

(9

5%

CIs

)

For more on reducing avoidable mortality in Hospitals see:

www.institute.nhs.uk/ram

Six Sigma – focuses on eliminating defects and reducing

variation in processes

IMPROVEDEFFECTIVENESSDEFINE IMPROVE CONTROLMEASURE ANALYZE

IMPROVEDEFFICIENCY AND

SPEED

SPECIFY VALUE

LEVEL PERFECTIONPERFECTIONUNDERSTANDUNDERSTAND

DEMANDFLOW

Lean – focuses on dramatically improving

flow in the value stream and eliminating

waste

© NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement 2006

http://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_value/lean_thinking/lean_six_sigma.html

12

Use 20% of Tools to Achieve 80% of Benefits

Value Stream Mapping

Visual workplace/5s

Standard work

Employee involvement

Match resources to demand

Kanban signals

Rapid Improvement Events

DMAIC

SPC/Measures

Voice of the customer

Pareto charts

LEAN SIX SIGMA

© NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement 2006

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

http://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_value/lean_thinking/lean_six_sigma.html

Common themes

• The Process view

• The Systems view

• Variation (and use of SPC)

• Flow

• Identifying the customer

• Links to Human Factors ?

“I am quite happy to be promiscuous… what insights does Lean tell me,

what does theory of constraints tell me on the same problem and then I can reconcile those two. But people are not good at that at the moment,

they don’t understand either well enough to be able to reconcile.”

Boaden et al: 2006

Quality improvement: Theory and practice in the NHS

http://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_value/lean_thinking/lean_six_sigma.html

Institute publications from:

www.institute.nhs.uk

• Going lean in the NHS

• Releasing time to care

– The productive ward

• The NHS Productive Leader Programme

• The Productive Operating Theatre /theatres

• Reducing avoidable deaths in hospital /ram

– Chief executives lead the way

– Medical directors drive improvement

• Focus on: productivity and efficiency

• Lean Simulation

http://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_value/lean_thinking/lean_six_sigma.html