LEARNING TEAM EVALUATION

LEARNING TEAM____D_____ ASSIGNMENT ____WEEK 2 TEAM REFLECTION_______________________ WEEK____2_____

USING THE SCALE BELOW, INDIVIDUALLY RATE EACH MEMBER OF YOUR LEARNING TEAM, INCLUDING YOURSELF (PLEASE USE THE COLLABORATION GUIDE ON THE NEXT PAGE FOR A MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EACH CATEGORY).

4 = Excellent 3 = Good 2 = Fair 1 = Poor 0 = None

Learning Team Evaluation Form

TeamInvolvement

(Active and substantively involved in the team discussion)

TimeManagement

(Supported team timeline)

Establishing and Following Guidelines(Helped to define and adhere to the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team)

ProfessionalCommunication

(Communicated clearly and professionally)

TeamContributions

(What did each team member contribute to the assignment? What value did that contribution add to the completed assignment? )

CollaborationComments

(Please include any comments describing why each person received the collaboration score that you gave them.)

score score score score comments commentsSelf ScoreLisa Keene

4 4 4 4

I contributed to team discussions, along with company selection and determination between service or product to use for this week’s assignment. My portion of the assignment was completed and submitted on time.

Team D, so far, is working very well together. All of the team members participate to the best of the ability and has so far, submitted their portions in a timely manner. I gave everyone a score of 4 based on this week’s assignment, participation, and timeliness.

Team Member Ahmed Abuoun

4 4 4 4 Ahmed contributed to team discussions this week. He also completed and submitted his portion on time.

Team D, so far, is working very well together. All of the team members participate to the best of the ability and has so far, submitted their

This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. This may include presenting new ideas, examples, perspective, or asking additional questions of team members that help to further the overall team discussion. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the course eCampus page. They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams. February 2011

LEARNING TEAM EVALUATIONportions in a timely manner. I gave everyone a score of 4 based on this week’s assignment, participation, and timeliness.

Team Member Jeremy Davis

4 4 4 4

Jeremy participated in team discussions this week. He also completed and submitted his portion on time.

Team D, so far, is working very well together. All of the team members participate to the best of the ability and has so far, submitted their portions in a timely manner. I gave everyone a score of 4 based on this week’s assignment, participation, and timeliness.

Team Member Marinela Diko

4 4 4 4 Marinela led the team in the Week 2 assignment. She was very prompt in her responses to the team in regards to the direction we should be taking this week. She was active in all team discussions. She was prompted in completing the assignment to post

Team D, so far, is working very well together. All of the team members participate to the best of the ability and has so far, submitted their portions in a timely manner. I gave everyone a score of 4 based on this week’s assignment, participation, and

This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. This may include presenting new ideas, examples, perspective, or asking additional questions of team members that help to further the overall team discussion. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the course eCampus page. They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams. February 2011

LEARNING TEAM EVALUATIONfor team approval. timeliness.

Team Member Walt Seng

4 4 4 4

Walt participated in this week’s discussions and selection of company and which direction we should go – service or product. Walt completed and submitted his portion on time, and offered to help if needed.

Team D, so far, is working very well together. All of the team members participate to the best of the ability and has so far, submitted their portions in a timely manner. I gave everyone a score of 4 based on this week’s assignment, participation, and timeliness.

Team Member (Name)Team Member (Name)

Team ContributionsPlease consider the following when providing individual and team feedback on contributions made to the assignment.

1) Based on the contributions and collaboration for this assignment, should all team members get the same grade? If not, who should get a different grade (higher or lower) and why? Yes, I believe all team members should receive the same grade. The team worked well together in deciding what company to use for the assignment, along with the service or product approach we should take. Each team members portions were submitted to the team forum in a timely fashion to allow Marinela time to compile the portions and fit into one flowing paper for submission.

2) What value you did you add to the completed product? How does that compare to your teammates? Each team member was active in team discussions in deciding which company to use. No one, in my opinion, pulled more weight than another team member. Each team member communicated their opinions in a timely manner.

3) What can you, personally, do to improve future team collaborations? I could think more outside of the box in terms of suggestions to offer the team.

*Please review the Learning Team Collaboration Guide on the next page for a description of the expectations for each category.

This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. This may include presenting new ideas, examples, perspective, or asking additional questions of team members that help to further the overall team discussion. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the course eCampus page. They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams. February 2011

Learning Team Collaboration GuideTeam

InvolvementTime

ManagementEstablishing and Following

GuidelinesProfessional

Communication

Excellent (4)Active and substantive involvement in team discussions.

Supported team timeline and met the assignment due date.

Took the lead on establishing and following the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team.

Interacted with other members of the team with a respectful and professional tone. Communication was clear with no typographical or grammatical errors.

Good (3)Good overall substantive involvement in team discussion.

Supported a majority of the team timeline and met the assignment due date.

Helped to establish and follow the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team.

Interacted with other members of the team with a respectful and professional tone. Communication was clear with minor typographical or grammatical errors.

Fair (2)Moderate substantive involvement in team discussion.

Supported some of the team timeline and met the assignment due date.

Followed the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team.

Interacted with other members of the team with an informal tone. Communication was effective with minor typographical or grammatical errors.

Poor (1) Minimal substantive involvement in team discussion.

Did not support the team timeline but still met the assignment due date.

Did not always follow the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team.

Interactions with other members of the team were disrespectful and inappropriate at times. Communication was poor with numerous typographical or grammatical errors.

None (0) No substantive involvement in team discussion.

Did not support the team timeline .

Did not follow team goals, roles, or responsibilities.

No communication.

LEARNING TEAM EVALUATION

This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. This may include presenting new ideas, examples, perspective, or asking additional questions of team members that help to further the overall team discussion. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the course eCampus page. They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams. February 2011