libr285 adams pptpres article critique siek 111511

Upload: siekal3276

Post on 06-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 LIBR285 Adams PPTPres Article Critique Siek 111511

    1/7

    LEADERSHIP UNDER SEVERE STRESS:A Grounded Theory Study

    Critique byAlexandra Siek

    SJSU LIBR 285Fall 2011

  • 8/3/2019 LIBR285 Adams PPTPres Article Critique Siek 111511

    2/7

    Topic and method of study GOAL of 1998 study: to develop a theoretical understanding of

    leadership under severe stress from a performance-orientedperspective. (Larsson, 441)

    No given definition of performance oriented perspective; diddefine severe stress as well as grounded theory approach.

    METHOD employed: Grounded theory.

    Grounded theory= an inductiveapproach to the study of social lifethat attempts to generate a theoryfrom the constant comparing ofunfolding observations. (Babbie, 307)

    Method seems to fit goal.

  • 8/3/2019 LIBR285 Adams PPTPres Article Critique Siek 111511

    3/7

    Selection of subjects 16 informants selected.

    8 Swedish participants: male officers, ages 25 55.

    Chosen based on personal knowledge by authors and backgroundof varying experience in stressful leadership positions.

    8 Norwegian participants: 4 male officers; 2 female and 2 malepsychologists. Ages: 38 47.

    Chosen based on background of varying experience in stressfulleadership positions. Three of the psychologists worked there andtook part in the study. (Larsson, 442)

    Selection of males vs. females; reliance on available subjects mightresult in bias.

    Scientists acting as subjects high possibility for conflict of interest,lack of objectivity, and impact / effect on what is being observed.

    Participants as informants by nature marginal, potential for bias.

  • 8/3/2019 LIBR285 Adams PPTPres Article Critique Siek 111511

    4/7

    Data Collection

    In-depth interviews; follow up group interviews forNorwegian subjects only to stimulate participants tocome up with additional points of view.

    Questions differed slightly between the two groups. No raw data or codes were provided in article or as

    addenda; impacted extent of this critique.

    Possibility: follow-up interviews with Swedishinformants via teleconferencing?

    Difference in questioning can lead to different results uniformity among all should have been the goal.

  • 8/3/2019 LIBR285 Adams PPTPres Article Critique Siek 111511

    5/7

    Data Analysis Interviews were transcribed

    verbatim; consecutively analyzed viaCONSTANT COMPARITIVE METHOD.

    First reported step was OPEN CODING: scrutinized data to ID

    patterns of thought, feelings, & actions related to interviewthemes. Axial coding also seems to have occurred. Formulated 950 codes off of participant language. Compared codes to verify and confirm content, grounding. Integrated categories through sorting codes into categories;

    performed comparisons between categories; and betweencategories, codes, and interview protocols. (Larsson, 442) Engaged in delimiting theory - fitted together the categories

    using constant comparative method.

  • 8/3/2019 LIBR285 Adams PPTPres Article Critique Siek 111511

    6/7

    Data Results After fitting together the categories, authors articulated

    model of leadership under severe stress and theunderlying circumstances. (Larsson, 442)

    E.g. isolated general classes of leadership characteristicsunder severe stress as well as numerous subclasses.

    Authors also identified dominant recurring themesthroughout the study.

    MAIN

    VALUE

    OF

    STUDY

    : data-based map of leadershipduring incidents of high stress or severe crisis, with thecodes and categories that make up this dimension, as wellas the codes and categories in the dimension underlyingcircumstances.

  • 8/3/2019 LIBR285 Adams PPTPres Article Critique Siek 111511

    7/7

    Limitations and need for further study;

    Conclusion

    LIMITATIONSACCORDINGTOTHEAUTHOR: the information obtained has not been gathered with the

    intention to permit a complete analysis of these underlyingcircumstances [of severe stress] per se and

    in constructing [their] current model [they] were limited todata obtained from a selected group of military officers,soldiers, and psychologists.

    2-5 years passed between the stressful incidents and theinterviews in the case of the Swedish subjects.

    ADDITIONALLIMITATIONSANDPROBLEMS: while the aims andgoals of the study as well as data analysis seemed on track,from the limited perspective of this reviewer, some aspectsof participant selection and data collection seem fraught

    with error.