list of european valuation studies - european commission · list of european valuation studies 1....

ENCO Environmental Consultants a.s Assessment of EVRI and the Expansion of its Coverage to the EU

19

PART II

LIST OF EUROPEAN VALUATION STUDIES

1. Introduction

This is a reasonably complete list of European studies using environmental valuationtechniques (Contingent Valuation, other Stated Preference techniques - conjoint analysis,choice experiments, contingent ranking, contingent ratings etc., Travel Cost Method, HedonicPrice Method). Note that several publications might be based on the same empirical study.Therefore the number of original empirical studies is not simply the sum of the publications.The list also contains a few publications which represents collection of studies (i.e. literaturereviews and meta analyses).

The most complete existing review of European valuation studies done up until 1992 isNavrud, S. (ed.) 1992: Pricing the European Environment (Scandinavian University Press/Oxford University Press). The book covers the following countries: Finland, France,Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom and reviewsabout 200 studies. Around the time the book was published, Denmark, Italy and Spain hadjust started doing valuation studies (especially on forest recreation). The list below containsmainly studies from the period 1992-1999, and clearly shows how the interest inenvironmental valuation techniques has spread across Europe. As a result of this, and highactivity in the European countries that traditionally have done many valuation studies (UK,Sweden and Norway), the annual number of valuation studies performed in Europe has alsoincreased greatly over the seven years that have passed since Navrud (1992) was published.The list below contains about 450 studies; i.e. bringing the total number of European studiesto at least 650.

The studies are listed in alphabetical order by country in three categories: i) EU memberstates, ii) EFTA countries and iii) Central and Eastern European countries. EVRI contains thefollowing information for each entered/captured study: author(s), year of publication, title,and reference to where it is published (journal, book, internal report/working paper, externalreport). This list together with the about 200 studied listed in Navrud (1992), will form thebasis for selecting European studies to be captured in EVRI. the web-based database forenvironmental valuation studies: EVRI - see http://www.evri.ec.gc.ca/EVRI/. In this pilotproject we aim at capturing about 15 studies. Based on the criteria that we should capture atleast one study in each EU - member state, 15 studies from the list are proposed (marked "*").Since the valuation methods have developed rapidly over the last 5 years, we have mainlyselected studies from the period 1994-1999 in this first stage of capturing studies. Studies ontopics which are thought to be of interest to all EU member states (and preferably thosefunded by the European Commission) have been selected. We have also tried to select studieson a wide range of environmental goods.


20

2. References to European Valuation studies

EU-MEMBER STATES

AUSTRIA (16 studies)

Getzner, M. 1998. On-site vs. distant questioning: some empirical evidence from valuingrecreation functions of city-near forests. Working Paper of the University ofKlagenfurt Department of Economics 9801, Klagenfurt (submitted to Journal ofEnvironmental Management)

Getzner, M. 1999. Die Bewertung von Biodiversität als produktive Ressource. (Valuation ofBiodiversity as Productive Resource). Working paper of the University of KlagenfurtDepartment of Economic 9904, Klagenfurt (submitted to Zeitschrift fürBetriebswirtschaft)

Getzner, M. 1999. Verteilungsprobleme der monetären Bewertung von Umweltgütern.(Problems of distribution in valuing environmental goods. In: EconomisingEnvironmental Policy - Contributions to Environmental Economics). In:Junkernheinrich, M. (Hrsg.), Ökonomisierung der Umweltpolitik. Beiträge zurvolkswirtschaftlichen Umweltökonomie. Analytica, Berlin, S. 131-145. In German

Getzner, M. 1999. Extending the framework of valuing regional biodiversity. WorkingPaper of the University of Klagenfurt Department of Economics 9802, Klagenfurt.(Submitted to Environmental and Resource Economics)

Getzner, M. 1999. Hypothetical and real economic commitments, and social statuin valuing a species protection program. Working paper of the University ofKlagenfurt Department of Economic 9903, Klagenfurt

Hackl, F. 1996. Contingent Valuation als Instrument zur ökonomischen Bewertung derLandschaft, (Contingent Valuation as an instrument for economic valuation oflandscape). In German. Ph.D. thesis Department of Economics, University of Linz.Europäishe Hochschulschriften. Reihe V. Volks- und Betriebswirtschaft, Volume2058, Petter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, New York, Paris, Wien

Hackl, F. 1997. Contingent Valuation als Instrument zur ökonomischen Bewertung derLandschaft (Contingent Valuation as an Instrument to Assess the Recreation Functionof Landscape), Verlag Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main. In German

Hackl, F. and G. J. Pruckner 1995. Der Wert der Natur- Eine ökonomische Bewertung desNationalparks Kalkalpen (The value of nature - an economic valuation of the"Kalkalpen"-National Park in Austria), Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter 6/95. In German

Hackl, F and G. J. Pruckner 1997. Towards more efficient compensation programs fortourists' benefits from agriculture in Europe, Environmental & Resource Economics10, 189 - 205, 1997

Hackl, F. and G. J. Pruckner 1999. On the gap between open-ended and closed-ended CVM-answers, forthcoming in Applied Economics

Kosz, M. 1996. Valuing Riverside Wetlands: the Case of the "Donau-Auen" National Park.Ecological Economics 16 (2), S. 109-127

Kosz, M. 1997. Probleme der monetären Bewertung von Biodiversität. (Problems ofmonetary valuation of biodiversity). Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht 20(4), S. 531-550. In German


21

O´Brien, M. 1998. Respondent Familiarity in Non-Market Valuation - A Natural Barrier forthe Contingent Valuation Method. Ph.D. Dissertation. Dept. of Economics, Universityof Innsbruck, Austria. Unpublished

Pruckner, G. J. 1994. Die Ôkonomische Quantifizierung natürlicher Ressourcen – EineBewertung übertrieblicher Leistung der Österreichischen Land- und Forstwirtschaft.(The measurement of non market values in the Austrian agricultural sector), VerlagPeter Lang, Frankfurt am Main. In German

*Pruckner, G. J. 1995. Agricultural Landscape Cultivation in Austria. An Application of theCVM. European Review of Agricultural Economics 22 (2), 173-190.

Schönbäck, W., M. Kosz and T. Madreiter 1997. Nationalpark Donau-Auen: Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse. Springer Verlag, Wien/New York. (Donau Auen national park: Cost-benefitAnalysis). In German

BELGIUM (2 studies)

*Mayeres I., S. Ochelen and S. Proost 1996. The marginal external costs of urban transport.Transportation Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 111-130

Moons, E. 1998. Estimation of the recreational values of a forest. M.Sc. thesis. Department ofEconomics, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;

DENMARK (3 studies)

Bille Hansen, T. 1997. The Willingness-To-Pay for the Royal Theatre in Copenhagen as aPublic Good. Journal of Cultural Economics 21, 1-28.

Dubgaard, A. 1994. Valuing Recreational Benefits from the Mols Bjerge Area, Denmark. InDubgaard, A., I.J. Bateman and M. Merlo (eds.) (1995) Economic Valuation of Benefitsfrom Countryside Stewardship, Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk, Kiel. (Report to the EuropeanCommission)

*Jordal-Jørgensen, J. 1995. Samfundsmæssig værdi af vindkraft. Delrapport: Visuelle effekterog støj fra vindmøller - kvantifisering og værdisætning. (Social Costs of Wind Power.Partial Report: Visual impacts and noise from wind mills). Report December 1995,Institute for Local Government Studies (AKF), Copenhagen. In Danish

FINLAND (34 studies)

Gynther L. and T. Otterström 1997. Cost-benefit analysis of emission reduction in the energysector (in Finnish). Ilmansuojelu-lehti, 1/97 (Journal of the Finnish Air PollutionPrevention Society).

Gynther L. and T. Otterström 1998. Willingness to pay for better air quality includingapplication to fuel conversion buses from diesel to natural gas. In proceedings of theTERA98 Conference: Externalities in the Urban Transport: Assessing and Reducing


22

the Impacts. 27-29 October 1998, Milan, Italy. ForthcomingGynther L. et al. 1998 Willingness to pay for better air quality. Ilmansuojelu-lehti 4/98

(Journal of the Finnish Air Pollution Prevention Society)Gynther L. 1998: Economic benefits from better air quality (in Finnish). Kunnalliselämä

Magazine 6/98.Heiskanen, H., E. Mäntymaa and R. Svento 1993. Testing the inclusiveness insensitivity

hypotheses in public goods valuation. Research Institute of Northern Finland,University of Oulu, Department of Economics, University of Oulu & Department ofEconomics and Management Sciences, University of Lapland. Discussion papers ineconomics and business studies, No. 9, Oulu, 21 p.

Huhtala, A. 1994. Is environmental Guilt a Driving Force? An Economic Study on Recycling.Ph.D. Thesis. University of California, Berkeley

Huhtala, A. 1999. How much do money, inconvenience and pollution matter? Analysinghouseholds’ demand for large-scale recycling and incineration. Journal ofEnvironmental Management 55; 27-38.

Mäntymaa, E. 1993. Ympäristöhyötyjen arviointi contingent valuation –menetelmällä(Valuing environmental benefits using contingent valuation method. In Finnish,abstract in English). University of Oulu. Research Institute of Northern Finland.Research Reports No. 109, Oulu, 140 p. (Licentiate thesis)

Mäntymaa, E. 1994. Continuous question and bidding tree technique in contingent valuationresearch. Research Institute of Northern Finland, University of Oulu, Department ofEconomics, University of Oulu. Department of Economics and Management Sciences,University of Lapland. Discussion papers in economics and business studies, No. 13,Oulu, 21 p

Mäntymaa, E. 1994. On revealing preferences with the contingent valuation method.Research Institute of Northern Finland, University of Oulu, Department of Economics,University of Oulu & Department of Economics and Management Sciences,University of Lapland. Discussion papers in economics and business studies, No. 14,Oulu, 22 p

Mäntymaa, E. 1997: Essays on Environmental Benefits and Hypothetical Markets. Ph.D.Thesis. Department of Economics, University of Oulu. Acta Universitatis OuluensisOecoconomica G2, Oulu University Press, Oulu, Finland. 202 p

Mäntymaa, E. 1998. Jokamiehenoikeuden arvo: Voiko sitä mitata rahassa? (Value of the rightof common access: can it be measured with money? In Finnish, abstract in English).In: Saarinen, J. & Järviluoma, J. (eds) Kestävyys luonnon virkistys- jamatkailukäytössä, Pallas-symposium 1997 (Sustainability in recreational and touristuse of nature, Pallas-symposium 1997), Finnish Forest Research Institute, ResearchPapers 671, Helsinki, p. 151-174

Mäntymaa, E. 1999. Pennies from Heaven? A Test of the Social Budget Constraint in aWillingness to Accept Compensation Elicitation Format. Journal of ForestEconomics, vol. 5, No 1, p. 169-192

Mäntymaa, E. 1999: Willingness to pay, willingness to accept: A CVM field study ofenvironmental commodities. In: O’Connor, M. and C.L Spash. (eds) Valuation and theenvironment: Theory, method and practice, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham &Northampton, p. 147-164

Mäntymaa, E. 1999. Determination of WTP for a change in water quality with free selectionof reference points. In: Boman, M., Brännlund, R. & Kriström, M. (eds.) Topics inenvironmental economics, Kluwer Academic Press, p. 189-204 (Forthcoming)

Mäntymaa, E. and R. Svento. 1999. A Generalised Test for Vagueness in HypotheticalMarkets. 32 p. Submitted to the Journal of Forest Economics


23

Moisseinen, E. 1997. Contingent Valuation. The Case of the Saimaa Seal. Ph.D. Dissertation.University of Joensuu, Publications in Social Sciences 28, Joensuu, 208 pp

Moisseinen, E. 1999: On Behavioural Intentions in the Case of the Saimaa Seal. Comparingthe Contingent Valuation Approach and Attitude-Behaviour Research. In O´Connorand C. L. Spash (eds.) 1999: Valuation and the Environment. Theory, Method andPractice, pp. 183-204. Advances in Ecological Economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

Ovaskainen, V., J. Mikkola and E. Pouta. 1998. Estimating recreation demand with on-sitedata: An application of truncated vs. truncated, endogenously stratified count datamodels. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 683. 27 p

Ovaskainen, V., H. Savolainen and T. Sievänen. 1992. The benefits of managing forests forgrouse habitats: A contingent valuation experiment. In Proceedings of the BiennialMeeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Gausdal, Norway, 1991.Scandinavian Forest Economics 33:263-274

Pouta, E., C. Z. Li, O. Tahvonen, J. Kuuluvainen and M. Rekola 1999: Policy planningmethod as a commodity in CVM: Participatory vs. Bureaucratic planning in natureconservation. University of Helsinki. Paper Presented at the 9th annual conference ofthe European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Oslo, June 25-27 1999. Tyrväinen, L. 1999. Monetary valuation of urban forest amenities in Finland.Academic dissertation. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 739. Vantaantutkimusasema. (In print/ to be defended in August 1999)

Sievänen, T., E. Pouta, and V. Ovaskainen. 1992. Problems of measuring recreation valuegiven everyman's rights. In Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the ScandinavianSociety of Forest Economics, Gausdal, Norway, 1991. Scandinavian ForestEconomics 33: 231-243

Svento, R. 1993. Some notes on trichotomous choice discrete valuation. Environmental andResource Economics, vol. 3, No 6, p. 533-543.

Svento, R. 1999. On the Asymmetry of the Vagueness Band in WTP Answers, Environmentaland Resource Economics (Forthcoming).

Tervonen, J. 1993. Talousveden laatu ja kuluttajan hyvinvointi – esimerkkinä Oulun kaupunki(Quality of drinking water and consumer welfare – a case study in city of Oulu. InFinnish). Finnish Environment Institute, Reports No 517

Tyrväinen, L. 1999. Economic value of urban forests: comparison of economic estimates. In:The living forest. Non-market benefits of forestry. Proceedings of an internationalsymposium on non-market benefits of forestry held in Edinburg, 24-28 June 1996.Forestry Commission. London: The stationery office. pp. 326-333

Tyrväinen, Liisa and Hannu Väänänen. 1998. The Economic Value Of Urban ForestAmenities: An Application of the Contingent Valuation Method: Landscape andUrban Planning 43: 105-118

Tyrväinen, L. 1997. The amenity value of the urban forest: An application of the hedonicpricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning 37: 211-222

Tyrväinen, L. 1997. Urban Forest Benefits and Property Prices: An application of hedonicpricing method. Proceedings of the Biennial meeting of the Scandinavian Society ofForest Economics, 19.-22.3.1996, Mekrijärvi, Finland. Scandinavian ForestEconomics 36: 433-443

Tyrväinen, L. 1996. Economic Valuation of Urban Forest Benefits. In: Randrup, T.B. &Nilsson K. (Eds.) Urban Forestry in the Nordic Countries. Proceedings of a NordicWorkshop on Urban Forestry held in Reykjavik, Iceland September 21-24, 1996.Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute. pp. 47-55

Tyrväinen, L. 1994. Estimating the Value of Urban Forests: Possibilities and Constraints.


24

Scandinavian Forest Economics. Proceedings of the Biennial meeting of theScandinavian Society of Forest Economics. Gilleleje, Denmark. October 1993.

Tyrväinen, L. 1994. Methods for Determining the Monetary Value of Urban Forest. Forest,Environment and New Technology in Northern Europe. International Conference inPetrozavodsk, Russia. September 1993. Joensuun yliopiston metsätieteellisentiedekunnan tiedonantoja 1/1994.

Tyrväinen, L., Nousiainen, I. and L. Tahvanainen. 1999. Valuation of Rural LandscapeAmenities: Application of the CVM in Valuing Impacts of Afforestation. Submittedto Environmental and Resource Economics. 22 p.

*Vainio, M. 1995. Traffic Noise and Air Pollution. Valuation of externalities with HedonicPricing and Contingent Valuation. Helsinki School of Economics and BusinessAdministration. Doctoral Dissertation A-102. 239 p

FRANCE (22 studies)

Armand, C. and F. Bonnieux 1999. Valeur du poisson sauvage et rentabilite sociale(Valuation of wild fish and social profitability). In French.. INRA Report. 1999/03, 96pp

Bonnieux, F., P. Rainelli and D. Vermersch 1999. Estimating the supply of environmentalbenefits by agriculture: a French case study. Environmental and Resource Economics:135-153

Bonnieux, F. and P. Le Goffe 1998. Cost-benefit analysis of landscape restoration : a casestudy in Western France, pp 85-96 ; in Dabbert s, Dubgaard A, Slangen l & WhitbyM (ed) The economics of landscape and wildlife conservation CAB International.

Bonnieux, F. and P. Le Goffe 1997. Valuing the benefits of landscape restoration. A casestudy of the Cotentin in Lower-Normandy, France, Journal of EnvironmentalManagement ; 321-333 ; (details in Bonnieux, F., P. Le Goffe and F. Allard (collab.);Chitrit, J.J. (collab.): Valeur sociale des paysages : le cas du bocage. INRA Report.1996/09 ; 42 p.).

Bonnieux, F., P. Le Goffe and D. Vermersch 1995: La methode d'evaluation contingente:application a la qualite des eaux littorales (CVM applied to the quality of coastalwaters). In French. Economie et Prevision, pp 89-106.

Bonnieux, F. ;Vermersch, D. 1993: Bénefices et coûts de la protection de l'eau : applicationde l'approche contingente a la pêche sportive (Benefits and costs of water protection:an application of CV to sport angling). In French. Revue d'Economie Politique; 131-152.

Bonnieux, F. ;Guerrier, C. 1992: Rapport sur la frequentation de la forêt de Rennes (Reporton the frequentation of the forest of Rennes (periurban forest - CV study). INRA report1992/07 ; 30 p. ;

Bonnieux, F. ;Boude, J.P. ;Guerrier, C. ;Richard, A.1991: La pêche sportive du saumon et dela truite de mer en Basse-Normandie: analyse economique. (Sport fishing in Lower

Normandy: an economic analysis for salmon and sea trout angling). INRA report1991/04 ; 78 p.

Desaigues, B. and J.-P. Amigues 1999: A cost-benefit analysis of preserving biodiversityUniversity of Paris. Paper Presented at the 9th annual conference of the EuropeanAssociation of Environmental and Resource Economists, Oslo, June 25-27.

Furlan, S. 1996: Evaluation du coût externe du bruit généré par le traffic automobile pour la


25

ville de Paris (External cost of road traffic noise in Paris). In French. University ofBourgogne - Institut Francais du Pétrole. Ph.D.: thesis.

Latouche K., P. Rainelli and D. Vermersch 1998: Food safety in beef consumption: biddinggames and French people's willingness to pay for safer meal. Paper presented at the56th EAAE seminar, Paris.

Latouche K., P. Rainelli and D. Vermersch 1998: Food safety issues and the BSEscare: some lessons from the French case Food Policy, 23, 5; 347-356(see also general report in French presenting the survey and the first results: "Attitudeset consentement à payer des consommateurs pour obtenir des biens alimentaires àfaible risque pour la santé. Application à la maladie de la vache folle" ENSAI (EcoleNationale de la Statistique etde l'Analyse de l'Information), Rennes 1997).

Le Goffe, P. ;Gerber, P. 1994 Coûts environnementaux et bénefices de l'implantation d'unesabliere en zone périurbaine : le cas de Pace (Ille-et-Vilaine). (Environmental costsand benefits of the implementation of a sand quarry: a case study in an urban fringe atPacé (Ille et Vilaine). In French. INRA Report 36 p.

Le Goffe, P. 1995. The benefits of improvements in coastal water quality : a contingentapproach. Journal of Environmental Management 45: pp 305-317.

Le Goffe, P. 1996. Hedonic pricing of agriculture and forestry externalities. Paper presentedat the Annual conference of the European Association of Environmental and ResourceEconomists, Lisbon, June 1996.

*Rozan A., 1999, Evaluation des bénéfices de santé d’une amélioration de la qualité de l’air :l’exemple de la Région strasbourgeoise., (Valuation of health benefits of animprovement in air quality : a study in Strasbourg), PhD Thesis, University LouisPasteur, Strasbourg. In French. (CV surveys both in France and Germany with benefittransfer between the two countries)

Rozan A., 1999: Une évaluation économique des bénéfices de morbidité induits par uneamélioration de la qualité de l’air, (Economic valuation of morbidity benefits inducedby an improvement in air quality), Economie et Prévision, submitted.. In French.

Rozan A., Stenger A., Willinger M., 1997: Consentement à payer pour la préservation de laqualité de l’eau souterraine : une comparaison entre usagers et non usagers”, (WTP forpreservation of groundwater quality : a comparison of users and non users), Cahiersd’Economie et Sociologie Rurales, n°45, pp.61-92, 4ème trimestre. In French.

Rozan A., Stenger A., Willinger M. 1999: Valeur de préservation de la qualité de la NappePhréatique d’Alsace”, (Preservation value of the quality of the Alsatian Aquifer), in Lamesure économique des bénéfices attachés aux hydrosystèmes. Synthèse duProgramme de Recherche 96-98, CEMAGREF eds, in press. In French.

Rozan A., Stenger A., Willinger M. 1999: Valeur de préservation et transférabilité intra-site etinter-site : Application à la Nappe Phréatique d’Alsace”, (Preservation value andtransferability intra and inter site : an application to the Alsatian Aquifer), in PatrickPoint (eds), La valeur économiques des hydrosystèmes. Méthodes et modèlesd’évaluations des services délivrés, Economica, Janvier 1999. In French.

Stenger A., 1994: Evaluation contingente des actifs environnementaux - Application à lavaleur de préservation de la qualité des eaux souterraines”, (Contingent Valuation ofenvironmental assets - Application to the preservation value of the groundwaterquality), PhD Thesis, University Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg. In French

Stenger A., Willinger M., 1998, “Preservation value for groundwater quality in a largeaquifer : a contingent valuation study of the Alsatian Aquifer”, Journal ofEnvironmental Management, 53, pp. 177-193.


26

GERMANY (3 studies)

Degenhardt, S. and S. Gronemann 1998: Die Zahlungsbereitschaft von Urlaubsgästen für denNaturschutz, Theorie und Empirie des Embedding-Effekts (The willingness to pay ofvacationers for nature conservation - theoretical and empirical evidence on theembedding-effect), In German. Verlag Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main

*Elsasser, P. 1995: Der Erholungswert des Waldes. Monetäre Bewertung derErholungsleistung ausgewählter Wälder in Deutschland (The Recreational Value ofForests. Monetary valuation of the recreational Experience of Selected Forest Areas inGermany). J.D. Sauerländers Verlag, Frankfurt am Main. In German.

Pommerehe, W. W. 1988: Measuring Environmental Benefits. A Comparison of HedonicTechnique and Contingent Valuation. In Bös, D., M. Rose & C. Seidl (eds.) 1988:Welfare and Efficiency in Public economics. Springer verlag, Heidelberg, s. 363-400.

GREECE (4 studies)

Georgiou, S., Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H. and Day, R.J. (forthcoming) Coastal bathing waterhealth risks: Assessing the adequacy of proposals to amend the 1976 EC Directive,Working Paper Series, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of theAegean, Lesvos, Greece.

Langford, I.H., Kontogianni, A., Skourtos, M.S., Georgiou, S. and Bateman, I.J., (1997)Multivariate mixed models for open-ended contingent valuation data: a case study onwillingness to pay for conservation of monk seals, CSERGE Global EnvironmentalChange Working Paper 97-10, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the GlobalEnvironment, University of East Anglia and University College London.

*Langford, I.H., Kontogianni, A., Skourtos, M.S., Georgiou, S. and Bateman, I.J., (1998)Multivariate mixed models for open-ended contingent valuation data: a case study onwillingness to pay for conservation of monk seals, Environmental and ResourceEconomics, 12: 443-456.

Langford, I.H., Skourtos, M., Kontogianni, A., Georgiou, S. and Bateman, I.J. (forthcoming)Use and non-use values for conserving endangered species: The case of theMediterranean Monk Seal, in Turner, R.K., Bateman, I.J. and Adger, W.N (eds.)Economics of Coastal and Water Resources: Valuing Environmental Functions, Kluwer,Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

IRELAND (6 studies)

*Hutchinson W G (1997) How public preference affects non market values for afforestationin Ireland. In: proceedings of the Agricultural Economics Society of Ireland1994/1995 (eds. L N Hart ) University College Dublin 161-169 .

Hutchinson W G, Chilton S M and Davis J (1994) Development and application of methods


27

to value the non-market benefits and costs of existing forestry and possible futureafforestation programmes in Ireland and Scotland. in: The socio - economic impact ofafforestation on rural development ( eds Dhubhain A and Gardiner J J UniversityCollege Dublin) Final Report on contract no. 8001-CT90-0008 under the EUCAMAR Programme.

Hutchinson W G and Chilton S M ( 1995) The use of CVM to explore the trade-offs betweenthe positive and negative externalities of afforestation programmes on marginalfarmland and peatland in Ireland. In: The role of agricultural externalities in highincome countries EAAE Seminar Vienna September 1994 ( eds. Hofreiter M F andVogel S ) Wissenschaftsverlag, Kiel 109-129

Hutchinson W G and Chilton S M (1995) Integrating cognitive psychology into the CVM toexplore the trade-offs between non market costs and benefits of alternativeafforestation programmes in Ireland Chapter 8 in Forest economics and theenvironment (Eds. Adamowicz W L et al ) CABI, London 160-180

Hutchinson W G (1997) How public preference affects non market values for afforestation inIreland. In: proceedings of the Agricultural Economics Society of Ireland 1994/1995(eds. L N Hart ) University College Dublin 161-169

Scarpa, R., W.G. Hutchinson, J. Buongiorno and S. Chilton 1999: Stated willingness-to-pay forforest recreation: Do forest attributes matter? Paper Presented at the 9th annualconference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists,Oslo, June 25-27 1999.

ITALY (18 studies)

Aimola, A. 1998: Individual WTPs for Reductions in Cancer Death Risks. Chapter 10 (pp.195-212) in Bishop, R.C. and D. Romano (eds.) 1998: Environmental ResourceValuation in Italy: Applications of the Contingent Valuation Method. KluwerAcademic Publishers.

Ascari, S. and S. Cernuschi 1996: Integration of pollutant dispersion modelling and hedonicpricing techniques for the evaluation of external costs of waste disposal sites. In A.Baranzini and F. Carlevaro (eds.): Econometrics of Environment andTransdisciplinarity (Volume 1): Proceedings of the LI st International Conference ofthe Applied Econometrics Association (AEA), Lisbon, April 1-12 1996; pp. 156-173.

Bazzani, G. M. 1998: The Economic Value of Hunting Activity: A CVM Study at TonezzaDel Cimone (Vicenza) Alpine Preserve. Chapter 8 (pp. 155-172) in Bishop, R.C. andD. Romano (eds.) 1998: Environmental Resource Valuation in Italy: Applications ofthe Contingent Valuation Method. Kluwer Academic Publishers

Bishop, R.C. and D. Romano (eds.) 1998: Environmental Resource Valuation in Italy:Applications of the Contingent Valuation Method. Kluwer Academic Publishers.(Collection of studies)

Callia, P. and E. Strazzera 1999: A Sample Selection Model for Protest Responses inContingent Valuation Analyses”, CRENOS working paper, 99.5(www.crenos.unica.it)

Callia, P. and E. Strazzera 1999: Bias and Efficiency of Single vs. Double Bound Models forContingent Valuation Studies: a Monte Carlo Analysis, FEEM working paper 10.99(www.feem.it); (forthcoming in Applied economics)

Casini, L. and S. Romano 1998: The Economic Value of Hunting in Florence Province.


28

Chapter 7 (pp. 139 -154) in Bishop, R.C. and D. Romano (eds.) 1998: EnvironmentalResource Valuation in Italy: Applications of the Contingent Valuation Method.Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Locatelli Biey, M. 1994: Abitazioni e disponibilitá a pagare dei cittadini. Un´applicazione delmetodo dei przzi edonici ((Housing and willingness to pay of households. Anapplication of the Hedonic Price method). In Italian. Unpublished.

Marangon, F. And P. Rosato 1998: The Economic Value of Wildlife (Game and Non-Game):Two CVM Case Studies from North-Eastern Italy. Chapter 6 (p. 111 - 138) in Bishop,R.C. and D. Romano (eds.) 1998: Environmental Resource Valuation in Italy:Applications of the Contingent Valuation Method. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Merlo, M. And F. Della Puppa 1994: Public Benefit Valuation in Italy. A Review of Forestryand Farming Applications. In Dubgaard, A., Bateman, I.J. and Merlo, M. (eds.) (1995)Economic Valuation of Benefits from Countryside Stewardship, WissenschaftsverlagVauk, Kiel, 220 pp.

Notaro, S. and G. Signorello 1999: Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: A ComparisonAmong Multiple Bounded, Double Bounded, Single Bounded and Open Ended Formats.Department of Agricultural Economics and Resource Valuation, University of Catania,Italy. Paper Presented at the 9th annual conference of the European Association ofEnvironmental and Resource Economists, Oslo, June 25-27 1999.

*Riganti, P. and R. Scarpa 1998: Categorical Nesting and Information Effects on WTPEstimates for the Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Campi Flegrei. Chapter13 (pp.245-260) in Bishop, R.C. and D. Romano (eds.) 1998: Environmental ResourceValuation in Italy: Applications of the Contingent Valuation Method. KluwerAcademic Publishers

Romano, D. And L. Vigano 1998: A review of CVM environmental applications in Italy.(Review of 14 Italian valuation studies 1982-1994; published in Italian; see table 6).Chapter 2 (pp. 11-44) in Bishop, R.C. and D. Romano (eds.) 1998: EnvironmentalResource Valuation in Italy: Applications of the Contingent Valuation Method.Kluwer Academic Publishers

Scarpa, G. Sirchia and M. Bravi 1998: Kernel vs. Logit modelling of single bounded CVresponses: Valuing Access to Architectural and Visual Arts Heritage in Italy. Chapter12 (pp. 233-244) in Bishop, R.C. and D. Romano (eds.) 1998: EnvironmentalResource Valuation in Italy: Applications of the Contingent Valuation Method.Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Signorello, G. 1998: Valuing Birdwatching in aediterranean Wetland. Chapter 9 (pp. 173-192) in Bishop, R.C. and D. Romano (eds.) 1998: Environmental Resource Valuationin Italy: Applications of the Contingent Valuation Method. Kluwer AcademicPublishers.

Strazzera, E., R.L. Keller and J. Guyse 1999: “Discounting Environmental Long TermOptions: an Experimental Approach”, mimeo, University of California, Irvine.

Strazzera, E. 1999: Contingent Valuation and Experimental Choice Methods for the Analysisof the Touristic Demand for the Marine Park of La Maddalena, Report for theEnvironmental Department of the Regional Government of Sardinia.

Tempesta, T. 1998: The Economic Value of Rural Landscape: An Application to the AreaBetween Isonzo and Tagliamento Rivers (Friuli-Venezia Giulia). Chapter 11 (pp. 213-232) in Bishop, R.C. and D. Romano (eds.) 1998: Environmental Resource Valuationin Italy: Applications of the Contingent Valuation Method. Kluwer AcademicPublishers.


29

PORTUGAL (14 studies)

*Machado, F. And S. Mourato 1998: Improving the Assessment of Water Related HealthImpacts: Evidence from Coastal Waters in Portugal. Paper presented at the First WorldCongress on Environmental and Resource Economics, Venice, June 25-27 1998. (Partof the EC DG XII Project: Benefit Transfer and the European Union: With SpecialReference to Health.).

Nunes, P.A., 1997: Quanto Vale a Biodiversidade?, Forum Ambiente, n. 34, pp. 61-63,Lisbon, Portugal;

Nunes, P.A., (1998) "Avaliação Económica do Parque Natural do Sudoeste Alentejano eCosta Vicentina", Final Report delivered at the cabinet of the Portuguese Secretary ofState for Natural Resources, Lisbon, Portugal;

Nunes, P.A., 1998 "Non-parametric testing procedures and parametric model specifications ofthe stated WTP responses from a CV survey in Portugal", CES discussion paper, n.98.11, Center for Economic Studies, Department of Economics, Catholic University ofLeuven, Leuven, Belgium;

Nunes, P.A., 1998: Assessing Recreation and Biodiversity Benefits: evidence from a CVsurvey in Portugal", CES discussion paper, n. 98.12, Center for Economic Studies,Department of Economics, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;

Nunes, P.A., 1999: Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Recreation and BiodiversityProtection Programs: evidence from a CV survey in Portugal", Planetary Garden 99,book of proceedings, pages 397-401, Savoie Technoloc, Chamberry, France.

Nunes, P.A., 1999: Assessing Recreation and Biodiversity Benefits: Statistical Specificationand Validity Tests", 5th Conference on Environmental Education, volume of abstracts,page 16, Zurich, Switzerland

Nunes, P.A., 1999: Non-parametric testing procedures and parametric model specifications inestimating WTP responses from a contingent valuation in Portugal", a forthcoming inXIIth World Congress of the International Economic Association, book ofproceedings, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Nunes, P.A., 1999: Economic Valuation Of A Natural Protected Area In Portugal, acontingent valuation application at the Parque Natural do Sudoeste Alentejano e CostaVicentina", format for summary progress an final report, EC Environment and ClimateResearch Programme, Contract n°:ENV4-CT97-5050.

Nunes, L.C. M. Cunha-e-Sa, and M. Ducla-Soares 1998: Testing for Rationality: The Case ofDiscrete-Choice Data. Economic Letters, vol. 60.

Nunes, L.C. M. Cunha-e-Sa, M. Ducla-Soares, M. A. Rosado and B. Day 1999: IdentifyingNonrational Behaviour in Recreation Demand Models. Faculdade de Economia,Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Unpublished.

Rosado, M. A., L.C. Nunes, M. Cuhna-E-Sá, M. Ducla-Soares and B. Day 1999: Identifyingnonrational behaviour in recreation demand models. Universidade Nova de Lisboa.Paper Presented at the 9th annual conference of the European Association ofEnvironmental and Resource Economists, Oslo, June 25-27 1999.

Santos, J.M.L. 1999: Accounting for variation in contingent valuation estimates of landscapebenefits: genuine value differences or method-led divergences ? Insituto Superior deAgronomia, Lisbon. Paper Presented at the 9th annual conference of the EuropeanAssociation of Environmental and Resource Economists, Oslo, June 25-27 1999.


30

SPAIN(30 studies)

Azqueta Oyarzun.D. undated: Economía ambiental y valorización de espacios naturalesEspaña Economistas, pp.429-434.

Azqueta Oyarzun, D. 1994: Valoración económica de la calidad ambiental. MacGraw-Hill.Azqueta Oyarzun, D. 1996:Valoración económica del medio ambiente: una revisión crítica

de los métodos y sus limitaciones”. ICE,nº 751,pp. :37-46.Azqueta Oyarzun, D. 1997: El valor económico de los servicios recreativos de los espacios

naturales. MacGraw HillAzqueta Oyarzun, D. 1997: Campos y otros:”El valor ambiental y comercial del Parque

Natural de Monfragüe. Mac Graw-Hill.Campos, P. and P. Riera 1996: Rentabilidad social de los bosques. Análisis aplicado a las

dehesas y los montados ibéricos (Social Benefits from Forests. An Applied Analysisof Iberian Dehesas and Montados - Contains a CVM valuation of a natural park inExtremadura, Spain). In Spanish. Información Comercial Española, múm. 751, 1996,pp. 47-62.

Gomez, M. G. 1999: Estimating Environmental Benefits of Afforested Areas. Case Study onthe Atlantic Coast of the Iberian Penninsula. Department of Applied Economics,University of Vigo, Spain.

Hernández Alvarez P 1996: Sistemas abiertos. El entorno como fuente de biomasa y comoSumidero energético, .ICE,nº 751, pp. 95-104.

Jiliberto Herrera,R. 1996: Las cuentas del agua: un instrumento del análisis económico y Ambiental del ciclo del agua en España”.ICE,nº 751, pp. 77-94.Leon, C.J. 1997:c: Valuing Environmental Goods Using Bayesian Methods. Paper presented

at the Eighth Annual EAERE Conference, Tilburg University, June 26-28 1997.Leon, C.J. 1997a: Double Bounded Survival Values for Preserving the Landscape of Natural

Parks. Journal of Environmental Management.Leon, C.J. 1997b: Comparing Dichotomous Choice Models Using Truncated Welfare

Estimates Journal of Forest Economics.Loureiro,M.P.1994: Valoración económica de bienes ambientales: aplicación del método del

Coste de viaje al Parque Natural de la Dehesa del Moncayo. Instituto Agronó-Mico del Mediterraneo de Zaragoza.

Naredo, J.M. undated: Los flujos de energía, agua, materiales e información en la Comunidadde Madrid y sus contrapartidas monetarias”.

Naredo, J.M. 1993: Hacia una ciencia de los recursos naturales”.Ed. Siglo XXI. 1993.Naredo, J.M. 1994: Economía y Naturaleza. Las Cuentas de los Recursos Naturales.

MimegrafiadoNaredo, J.M. 1995: Las Cuentas del Agua en España”. D.G. Calidad de las Aguas. Mº Medio

Ambiente.1995.Polome, P. 1999: On combining contingent valuation and revealed preference data.

University of Vigo. Paper Presented at the 9th annual conference of the EuropeanAssociation of Environmental and Resource Economists, Oslo, June 25-27 1999.

Riera, P. 1993: Rentabilidad social de las infraestructuras: las rondas de Barcelona. Unanálisis coste-beneficio (Social Feasibility Study of Infraestructures. A cost-benefitanalysis of Barcelona ring roads - Contains the first Spanish CV application, whichwas on the environmental externalities of urban major roads) Book in Spanish. Cívitas,Madrid. 171 pp.

Riera, P. 1994: Amenity aspects of the Spanish countryside policy. In Dubgaard, A., I.


31

Bateman and M. Merlo (eds.) 1994: Identification and valuation of public benefitsfrom farming and countryside stewardship, pp. 133-144, Wissenschaftsverlag VAUK,Kiel.

Riera, P. 1997a: The use of contingent ranking for variations in air quality valuation due totransportation projects. In PTRC Transport, Highways and Planning, Seminars C andD, London, UK September 1997, pp. 465-480.

Riera, P. 1997b: El valor del tiempo de desplazamiento recreativo al campo (The Value ofRecreational Travel Time to the Countryside). In Spanish. Revista Española deEconomía Agraria, núm. 179, primer trimestre, 1997, pp. 191-201.

Riera, Pere and Paco Muñoz 1994: Valoración de los bienes no comerciales del bosquemediterráneo (Valuation of Non Commercial Goods from Mediterranean Forests). InSpanish. Agricultura y Sociedad, vol. 73, diciembre 1994, pp. 121-135,

Riera, Pere Jordi Boltà and Gemma Golobardes 1998: Valor econòmic del Parc Nacionald’Aigüestortes i Estany de Sant Maurici i de la seva ampliació" (Economic Value ofthe Aiguestortes i Estany de Sant Maurici National Park and its enlargement - a CVstudy and travel cost study of the park’s value, as well as a contingent rankingvaluation of its recent enlargement) In Spanish . A chapter in La investigació al ParcNacional d'Aigüestortes i Estany de Sant Maurici. Quartes jornades sobre recerca alParc Nacional d’Aigüestortes i Estany de Sant Maurici. 22, 23 i 24 d'octubre de 1997,Espot (Pallars Sobirà), pp. 293-303, Direcció General de Medi Natural, Generalitat deCatalunya, 1998.

Riera: Pere and Marga Macian (undated): Análisis coste-beneficio de la ampliación delaeropuerto de Barcelona con externalidades ambientales. Ruido, polución atmosféricay ocupación de humedales. (Cost-benefit Analysis with Environmental Externalities ofBarcelona Airport’s Enlargement. Noise, Air Pollution, and Wetlands Occupation). InSpanish. Working Paper. Institut Univesitari d’Estudis Europeus.

Rirea, P. 1995: Beneficio Social del Pasillo Verde Ferroviario de Madrid (Social Benefit ofPasillo Verde Ferroviario de Madrid - a CV-study of a railway project and aContingent Ranking valuation of urban parks in Madrid). Book in Spanish. EditorialNoesis, Madrid

Rirea, Pere, Carles Descalzi and Àlex Ruiz 1994: El valor de los espacios de interés natural enEspaña. Aplicación de los métodos de la valoración contingente y el coste deldesplazamiento (The Economic Value of Natural Open Spaces in Spain (Pyreneemountains). Application of CVM and TCM). In Spanish. Revista Española deEconomía, número monográfico "Recursos Naturales y Medio Ambiente", 1994, pp.207-229.

*Sayadi, S. , R. J. Calatrava and M.C. G. Roa 1999: Estimating relative value of agrarianlandscape by conjoint analysis: The case of the Alpujarros (Southeastern Spain).,C.I.D.A. Departamento de Economia y Sociologia Agrarias, Paper Presented at the 9th

annual conference of the European Association of Environmental and ResourceEconomists, Oslo, June 25-27 1999.07.02

Sierra Ludwig,V. 1998: Emisiones antropogénicas de metano: territorialización yrepercusiones económico – ambientales. Revista Asturiana de Economía, 13; : 211-233

Sierra Ludwig,V. 1996: Interacciones econo-climáticas en el contexto de la contrastaciónempírica disponible”. RAE, nº 2, pp.:151-192.


32

SWEDEN (36 studies)

Boman, Mattias and Göran Bostedt (1995), ”Valuing the Wolf in Sweden: Are BenefitsContingent Upon the Supply”, In Göran Bostedt, Benefits of Amenities in the ForestEnvironment – Four papers Based on Contingent Valuation. Rapport 110, Departmentof Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå.

Bostedt, Göran and Leif Mattsson (1991), ”Skogens betydelse för turismen: Ensamhällsekonomisk pilotstudie” (The importance of forest in tourism: A cost-benefitpilot study). ). Working paper 141, Department of Forest Economics, SwedishUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå.

Bostedt, Göran and Leif Mattsson (1995), ”The Economic Value of Forest Characteristics forTourism in Sweden”. Journal of Tourism Research, 22.

Carlsson, F. 1999: Do hypothetical and actual willingness to pay differ in choiceexperiments? Application to the valuation of the environment. Paper Presented at the9th annual conference of the European Association of Environmental and ResourceEconomists, Oslo, June 25-27 1999.

Cravener, Martin (1995), ”Samhällsekonomisk värdering av den anlagda våtmarken iOxelösund. En tillämpning av contingent-valuation metoden” (Cost-benefit analysis ofthe man-made wetland in Oxelösund. An application of the contingent-valuationmethod). Exam paper, Department of Economics, University of Stockholm.

Drake, Lars (1987), ”Värdet av bevarat jordbrukslandskap - Resultat avintervjuundersökningar” (The value of preserving the agricultural landscape – Resultsfrom surveys). Rapport 289, Department of Economics and Statistics, SwedishUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Ultuna.

Drake, Lars, Kumm, Karl-Ivar and Mari Andersson (1991), ”Har jordbruket i Rottnadalennågon framtid? En analys av landskapsvärden och företagsekonomiska kostnader”(Does the agriculture in Rottna valley have any future? Analysis of landscape valuesand business costs). Småskriftserien nr 48, Department of Economics, SwedishUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Ultuna.

Fredman, Peter (1995), ”Endangered Species: Benefit Estimation and Policy Implications.Rapport 109, Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of AgriculturalSciences, Umeå.

Frykblom, Peter (1998),”Halved Emissions of Nutrients, What are the Benefits? – AContingent Valuation Survey Applied to Laholm Bay”, in PhD Dissertation, Agraria100, Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Uppsala.

Grudemo, Stefan (1987), ”Förbifart Osbyholm” (Detour Osbyholm). Working paper, Statensväg- och trafikinstitut, Linköping.

Grudemo, Stefan (1988a), ”CVM-studie av intrång i rekreationsområde – fallstudieKlockartorpsleden i Västerås”. (CVM-study of intrusion in a recreational area – casestudy Klockartorpsleden in Västerås) VTI notat T29, Statens väg- och trafikinstitut,Linköping.

Grudemo, Stefan (1988b), ”CVM-studie av intrång i rekreations- och naturområde – fallstudieSäterivägen i Mölnlycke”. (CVM-study of intrusion in a recreational and nature area –case study Säterivägen i Mölnlycke). VTI notat T47, Statens väg- och väg- ochtrafikinstitut, Linköping.

Hasund, Knut Per (1997),”Documentation of Three Contingent Valuation Surveys onPreservation of Landscape Elements of Agricultural Land” Swedish University ofAgricultural Sciences (SLU), Department of Economics.

Inregia AB (Institute for regional analysis), (1993), ”Bromma flygfält: Vad tycker


33

Brommaborna och andra Stockholmare?”. (Bromma airport: What’s the opinion ofBromma residents and other residents of Stockholm). Rapport, Inregia AB,Stockholm.

Ivehammar, Pernilla (1996), ”Värdering av biltunnel framför resecentrum i Linköping medbinär CVM” (Valuation of a car tunnel in front of the travel center in Linköping withbinary CVM). VTI notat 18, Väg- och transportforskningsinstitutet, Linköping.

Johansson, Per-Olov (1989), ”Valuing Public Goods in a Risky World: An Experiment”, s.37-38 in Henk Folmer and Ekko van Ierland (ed.), Valuation Methods an PolicyMaking in Environmental Economics. Studies in Environmental Science 36, ElsevierScience Publishers, Amsterdam.

Johansson, Per-Olov and Bengt Kriström (1988), ”Measuring Values for Improved AirQuality from Discrete Response Data: Two Experiments”. Journal of AgriculturalEconomics, 39, 439-455.

Johansson, Per-Olov and Stojan Zavisic (1989), ”Svenska folkets miljöbudget” (Swedes’environmental budget). Ekonomisk Debatt, 17, 6, 472-474.Johansson, Per-Olov, Bengt Kriström, and Leif Mattsson (1988), ”How is theWillingness toPay for Moose Hunting Affected by the Stock of Moose? An EmpiricalStudy of Moose-Hunters in the County of Västerbotten”. Journal of EnvironmentalManagement, 26, 163-171.

Katz, Katarina and Thomas Sterner (1989), ”Värdering av renare luft” (Valuation of cleanerair). Ekonomiska Samfundets Tidskrift, 4, 243-256.

Kriström, Bengt (1990), ”Valuing Environmental Benefits Using the Contingent ValuationMethod – An Econometric Analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Umeå Economic Studies No. 219,University of Umeå.

Kriström, Bengt (1995), ”Spike Models in Contingent Valuation: Theory and Illustrations”.Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå.Landell, Elin and Stefan Smith (1988), ”Miljökostnader av väginvesteringar – enmetodstudie”. (Environmental costs of road investments – a method study). Exampaper. Ekonomlinjen T7 vid Universitetet i Linköping.

Malmberg, Johan (1994), ”Attityder till bekämpningsmedel och betalningsviljan för enminskad användning av dessa i det svenska jordbruket” (Attitudes towards pesticidesand the wtp for their usage of them in the Swedish agriculture). Exam paper 126 innatural resource- and environmental economics. Department of Economics, SwedishUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Ulltuna.

Mattson, Leif (1990), ”Hunting in Sweden: Extent, Economic Values and StructuralProblems”. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 5, 563-576.

Mattsson, Leif and Chuan-Zhong Li (1993), ”The Non-Timber Value of Northern SwedishForests”. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 8, 426-434.

Mattsson, Leif and Chuan-Zhong Li (1994), ”How do Different Forest Management PracticesAffect the Non-Timber Value of Forests? An Economic Analysis”. Journal ofEnvironmental Management, 41, 79-88.

Nilsson, Måns and Monica Gullberg (1998), ”Externalities of Energy: SwedishImplementation of ExternE Methodology: The contingent valuation study on Klippen”Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI).

Schéele, Siv and Riita Sorsa (1993), ”Stockholmarnas syn på Bromma flygplats 1996 jämförtmed 1993”. (Stockholm residents’ view on Bromma airport 1996 compared to 1993).Inregia AB (Institute for regional analysis), Stockholm.

Silvander, Ulf (1991), ”Betalningsvillighetsstudier för sportfiske och grundvatten i Sverige”(The willingness to pay for angling and ground water in Sweden). Avhandlingar 2,Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Ultuna.


34

Silvander, Ulf (1991), ”Betalningsvillighetsstudier för sportfiske och grundvatten iSverige”(The willingness to pay for angling and ground water in Sweden).Avhandlingar 2, Department of Economics, Swedish University of AgriculturalSciences, Ulltuna.

*Söderqvist, Tore (1996), ”Contingent Valuation of a Less Eutrophicated Baltic Sea” BeijerDiscussion Paper Series No. 88, Beijer International Institute of EcologicalEconomics, The Royal Swedish Academy of Science.

Svedsäter, Henrik (1996),” Willingness to Pay for an Environmentally Protective Engine aContingent Valuation Study” Project paper for the M.Sc. Degree. Report 1996:4. Unitfor Environmental Economics, Department of Economics, Gothenburg University.

Svedsäter, H. 1999: Contingent valuation of global environmental resources. Tests of perfectand regular embedding. Paper Presented at the 9th annual conference of the EuropeanAssociation of Environmental and Resource Economists, Oslo, June 25-27 1999.

Trové, J. and J.O. Jansson (1987), ”Värdering av miljökostnader av en ny väg – enfallstudie av planerad motorväg på vägbank över Ljungskile” (Valuation ofenvironmental costs of a new road- a case study of a proposed highway throughLjungskile). VTI notat T07, Statens väg- och trafikinstitut, Linköping.

Werneman, Peter (1997), ”Vad är det ekonomiska värdet av en kvalitetsförändring ifågelsången? -contingent valuation method som ekonomisk värderingsmetod avvägintrångskostnader” (What’s the economic value of a quality change inFågelsången- CVM as an economic valuation method of road intrusion costs).Report1997:107. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Department ofEconomics.

THE NETHERLANDS (6 studies)

*Groot, A. W.N. and J. Willem 1999: Natural arguments for policy makers. A case study ofthe Oostvaardersplassen. University of Amsterdam. Paper Presented at the 9th annualconference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists,Oslo, June 25-27 1999.

Groot, A. de, J.W. Velthuijsen, The utility of quality: an estimation of the willingness to payfor electricity, in: International energy markets, competition and policy, conferenceproceedings 18th annual North American Conference Sept. 7-10, 1997, pp. 640-648,United States Association for Energy Economics, International Association for EnergyEconomics, Cleveland, Ohio

Hoevenagel, R. 1994: The Contingent Valuation Method: Scope and Validity. Ph.D.Dissertation. Free University, Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam.

Hoevenagel, R. and J.W. van der Linden 1993: Effects of Different Descriptions of theEcological Good on Willingness to Pay Values", Ecological Economics 7, 3, 223-238 ,

Spaniks, F. and O. Kuik 1998. Air Pollution and Health: The Netherlands. Unpublished.Institute for Environmental Studies, Free University, Amsterdam. (Part of the EC DGXII Project: Benefit Transfer and the European Union: With Special Reference toHealth.).

Wiestra, E. 1996: On the Domain of Contingent Valuation. Ph.D. Dissertation, FaculteitBestuurskunde, Universiteit Twente. Twente University Press, Enschede.


35

UNITED KINGDOM (192 studies)

Audus, H., Freund, P. and Smith, A. with Ball, P., Bateman, I.J., Beer, A., Berry, J.E.,Downing, T., Eyre, N.J., Foulds, S., Greener, R., Goldthorpe, S., Holland, M.R., Hope,C., Jenkyn-Jones, B., Johnson, C.J., Matthews, R., Sheikh, A., Summerfield, I., Watkiss,P., Williams, N. and Winder, C., (1996) Global Warming Damage and the Benefits ofMitigation, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham..

Bateman IJ, Langford IH, McDonald AL and Turner RK (1997) Valuation of therecreational benefits of a proposed sea defence scheme at Caister, East Anglia: acontingent valuation study, report to Sir William Halcrow and Partners Ltd. and GreatYarmouth Borough Council, pp165.

Bateman, I. J., Lovett, A.A. and Brainard, J.S. (forthcoming) Applying EnvironmentalEconomics using Geographical Information Systems: A Cost-Benefit Analysis ofConverting Agricultural Land to Multi-Purpose Woodlands, with a foreword byProfessor David W. Pearce, University College London, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Bateman, I.J. (1994) Carbon dioxide: Valuation and fixing via afforestation, Report to theEnergy Technology Support Unit (ETSU), Harwell, Oxfordshire as part of the IEAGreenhouse Gas R&D Programme, School of Environmental Sciences, University ofEast Anglia, pp95.

Bateman, I.J. and Lake, I. (1995) Developing a methodology for valuing the visual disamenityof high voltage electricity transmission lines: A hedonic pricing / GIS approach, Reportto the Commission of the European Community as part of the EXTERNE programme,Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU), Harwell, Oxfordshire, School ofEnvironmental Sciences, University of East Anglia,

Bateman, I.J. and Langford, I.H. (1995) Design effects in contingent valuation studies: Mentalaccount and temporal ordering effects, CSERGE Global Environmental Change WorkingPaper 95-02, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment,University of East Anglia and University College London, pp30.

Bateman, I.J. and Langford, I.H. (1997) Budget constraint, temporal and ordering effects incontingent valuation studies, Environment and Planning A, 29(7): 1215-1228.

Bateman, I.J. and Langford, I.H. (1997) Non-users willingness to pay for a National Park: anapplication and critique of the contingent valuation method, Regional Studies, 31(6):571-582.

Bateman, I.J. and Langford, I.H. (forthcoming) Valuing national parks, in Pearce, D.W. andTurner, R.K. (eds.) Environmental Benefits Estimation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Bateman, I.J. and Lovett, A.A., (1996) Evaluating recreation demand for natural areas: A GIS /benefit transfers approach, End of Award Report to the Economic and Social ResearchCouncil for award number L320223002, School of Environmental Sciences, Universityof East Anglia.

Bateman, I.J. and Willis, K.G. (eds.) (1999) Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory andPractice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries,Oxford University Press, (ISBN: 0-19-828853-0) with a foreword by Nobel LaureateProfessor Kenneth J. Arrow, Stanford University, pp645.

Bateman, I.J., Garrod, G.D., Brainard, J.S. and Lovett, A.A. (1995) Using geographicalinformation systems to apply the travel cost method: A study of woodland recreationvalue, Centre for Rural Economy Working Paper 16, Department of AgriculturalEconomics and Food Marketing, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, pp28.

Bateman, I.J., Bateman, S., Brown, D., Doktor, P., Karas, J.H.W., Maher, A., and Turner, R.K.,


36

(1991) Economic appraisal of the consequences of climate-induced sea level rise: A casestudy of East Anglia, Report to the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, London,Environmental Appraisal Group, University of East Anglia, pp217 plus 3 appendices.

Bateman, I.J., Brainard, J.S. and Lovett, A.A. (1995) Modelling woodland recreation demandusing geographical information systems: A benefit transfers study, CSERGE GlobalEnvironmental Change Working Paper 95-06, Centre for Social and Economic Researchon the Global Environment, University of East Anglia and University College London,pp65.

Bateman, I.J., Brainard, J.S. and Lovett, A.A. (1998) Transferring multivariate benefitfunctions using geographical information systems, Nota di Lavoro 84.98, FondazioneEni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milan, Italy.

Bateman, I.J., Brainard, J.S. and Lovett, A.A. (forthcoming) Development and application ofbenefits transfer via GIS, in Pearce, D.W. and Turner, R.K. (eds.) EnvironmentalBenefits Estimation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Bateman, I.J., Brainard, J.S., Garrod, G.D. and Lovett, A.A., (1997) The impact of journeyorigin specification and other assumptions upon travel cost estimates of consumersurplus: a geographical information systems analysis, Discussion Paper No.28,Department of Economics and Marketing, Lincoln University, Canterbury, NewZealand, pp10.

Bateman, I.J., Brainard, J.S., Garrod, G.D. and Lovett, A.A., (forthcoming) The impact ofjourney origin specification and other measurement assumptions upon individual travelcost estimates of consumer surplus: a geographical information systems analysis,Regional Environmental Change.

Bateman, I.J., Brainard, J.S., Lovett, A.A. and Garrod, G.D. (1999) Developing a benefitstransfer model of woodland recreation: a GIS approach, in Roper, C.S. and Park, A.(eds.) The Living Forest: Non-Market Benefits of Forestry, The Stationery Office,London, pp. 66-82.

Bateman, I.J., Brainard, J.S., Lovett, A.A. and Langford, I.H. (1999) Transferring multivariatebenefit functions using geographical information systems, in NCRAOA Report No. 5:Review of Data Bases and Latest State of the Art on Valuation of EnvironmentalBenefits, National Centre for Risk Analysis and Options Appraisal, EnvironmentAgency, London.

Bateman, I.J., Brainard, J.S., Lovett, A.A., Langford, I.H. Powe, N. and Saunders, C. (1998)Transferring multivariate benefit functions using geographical information systems,paper presented at the World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists(EAERE), Isola di San Giorgio, Venice, Italy, 25th-27th June 1998.

Bateman, I.J., Day, B., Lake, I. And Lovett, A.A. (1998) The Effect of Road Traffic onResidential Property Values: A Literature Review, report to The Scottish Office,Development Department, Edinburgh, School of Environmental Sciences, University ofEast Anglia, Norwich.

Bateman, I.J., Diamand, E., Langford, I.H. and Jones, A.P. (1996) Household willingness topay and farmers’ willingness to accept compensation for establishing a recreationalwoodland, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 39(1): 21-43.

Bateman, I.J., Diamand, E., Langford, I.H. and Jones, A.P. (forthcoming) Householdwillingness to pay and farmers’ willingness to accept compensation for establishing arecreational woodland, in Pearce, D.W. and Turner, R.K. (eds.) Environmental BenefitsEstimation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Bateman, I.J., Garrod, G.D., Brainard, J.S. and Lovett, A.A. (1996) Measurement, valuation andestimation issues in the travel cost method: A geographical information systemsapproach, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47(2): 191-205.


37

Bateman, I.J., Garrod, G.D., Diamand, E. and Langford, I.H. (1995) An economic appraisal ofthe viability of the Community Woodland Scheme, Centre for Rural Economy WorkingPaper 15, Department of Agricultural Economics and Food Marketing, University ofNewcastle upon Tyne, pp19.

Bateman, I.J., Georgiou, S. and Langford, I.H. (1999) Distance decay in the valuation ofenvironmental preferences: Two case studies, in NCRAOA Report No. 5: Review ofData Bases and Latest State of the Art on Valuation of Environmental Benefits,National Centre for Risk Analysis and Options Appraisal, Environment Agency,London.

Bateman, I.J., Kerr, G.N. and Langford, I.H. (1998) Models of response behaviours in multiple-bound contingent valuation, proceedings of Beyond Growth, Institutions and Policiesfor Sustainability: The Fifth Biennial Meeting of the International Society forEcological Economics, Santiago, Chile, 15th19th November 1998.

Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H. and Graham, A. (1995) A survey of non-users willingness to pay toprevent saline flooding in the Norfolk Broads, CSERGE Global Environmental ChangeWorking Paper GEC 95-11, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the GlobalEnvironment, University of East Anglia and University College London, pp34.

Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H. and Rasbash, J. (1999) Elicitation effects in contingent valuationstudies, in Bateman, I.J. and Willis, K.G. (eds.) Valuing Environmental Preferences:Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and DevelopingCountries, Oxford University Press, p511-539.

Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H., Munro, A., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (forthcoming) Assessingthe four Hicksian measures of welfare change for a public good: a contingent valuationsurvey of road disamenity, in Pearce, D.W. and Turner, R.K. (eds.) EnvironmentalBenefits Estimation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H., Munro, A., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1997) Estimating the fourHicksian welfare measures for a public good: a contingent valuation investigation of neo-classical, reference-dependent and lexicographic preference theories, presented at theEighth Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and ResourceEconomists (EAERE), Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University, theNetherlands, 26-28 June 1997.

Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H., Munro, A., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1998) Estimating the fourHicksian welfare measures for a public good: a contingent valuation investigation ofalternative preference theories, CSERGE Global Environmental Change Working Paper98-19, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, Universityof East Anglia and University College London.

Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H., Turner, R.K., Willis, K.G. and Garrod, G.D. (1995) Elicitation andtruncation effects in contingent valuation studies, Ecological Economics, 12(2):161-179.

Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H., Willis, K.G., Turner, K.G. and Garrod, G.D. (1996) Designeffects in contingent valuation: a case study on the Norfolk Broads wetland, inAnderson, G. (ed.) Metody Wyceny Srodowiska Przyrodniczego (Methods of Valuationof the Environment - published in Polish), Harvard Institute for InternationalDevelopment, the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Foundation ofEconomists of the Environment and Natural Resource, Bialystok, Poland.

Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H., Willis, K.G., Turner, R.K. and Garrod, G.D. (1993) The impacts ofchanging willingness to pay question format in contingent valuation studies: An analysisof open-ended, iterative bidding and dichotomous choice formats, Global EnvironmentalChange Working Paper 93-05, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the GlobalEnvironment, University of East Anglia and University College London, pp50.

Bateman, I.J., Lovett, A.A. and Brainard, J.S. (1996) Converting surplus agricultural land into


38

multi-purpose forestry: a GIS/benefit-cost analysis, CD-ROM proceedings of theTenth Annual Conference on Geographic Information Systems (GIS ‘96), Vancouver,March 18-21, 1996.

Bateman, I.J., Lovett, A.A. and Brainard, J.S. (1999) Developing a methodology for benefittransfers using geographical information systems: modelling demand for woodlandrecreation, Regional Studies, 33(3): 191-205.

Bateman, I.J., Lovett, A.A. and Brainard, J.S. (forthcoming) Developing a GIS-basedmethodology for benefit transfers, in Florax, R.J.G.M., Nijkamp, P. and Willis, K.G.(eds.) Comparative Environmental Economic Assessment: Meta-Analysis and BenefitTransfer, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Bateman, I.J., Munro, A., Rhodes, B., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1997) A test of the theory ofreference-dependent preferences, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2): 479-505.

Bateman, I.J., Munro, A., Rhodes, B., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1997) Does part-whole biasexist? An experimental investigation, Economic Journal, 107(441): 322-332

Bateman, I.J., Munro, A., Rhodes, B., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (forthcoming) Does part-whole bias exist? An experimental investigation, in Willis, K.G., Button, K.J. andNijkamp, P. (eds.) Environmental Analysis and Economic Policy: EnvironmentalValuation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (due summer 1999).

Bateman, I.J., Munro, A., Rhodes, B., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (forthcoming) A test of thetheory of reference-dependent preferences, in Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (eds.)Choices, Values, and Frames, Cambridge University Press, in press (due 1999).

Bateman, I.J., Munro, I.J., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1996) Does part-whole bias exist? Anexperimental investigation, CSERGE Global Environmental Change Working Paper 96-03, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University ofEast Anglia and University College London.

Bateman, I.J., Nishikawa, N. and Brouwer, R. (1999) Benefits Transfer in Theory andPractice: A Review, presented at Recent Developments in Environmental Valuation,Forestry Commision/Civil Service course, Barony Castle, Peebles, Scotland, 9th to 13th

May 1999.Bateman, I.J., Turner, R.K., Klein, R. and I. Langford (forthcoming) Valuing coastal amenity

and nature conservation, in Turner, R.K., Bateman, I.J. and Adger, W.N. ValuingCoastal Amenity and Nature Conservation (eds.) Economics of Coastal and WaterResources: Valuing Environmental Functions, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

Bateman, I.J., Turner, R.K., Powe, N., Langford, I.H. and Brouwer, R. (forthcoming)Contingent valuation and wetland management: The Norfolk Broads flood alleviationstrategy, in Turner, R.K., Bateman, I.J. and Adger, W.N. (eds.) Economics of Coastaland Water Resources: Valuing Environmental Functions, Kluwer, Dordrecht, TheNetherlands.

Bateman, I.J., Willis, K.G. and Garrod, G.D. (1993) Consistency between contingent valuationestimates: A comparison of two studies of UK National Parks, Countryside ChangeInitiative Working Paper 40, Department of Agricultural Economics and FoodMarketing, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.

Bateman, I.J., Willis, K.G. and Garrod, G.D. (1994) Consistency between contingent valuationestimates: A comparison of two studies of UK National Parks, Regional Studies, 28(5):457-474.

Bateman, I.J., Willis, K.G., Garrod, G.D., Doktor, P., Langford, I. and Turner, R.K. (1992)Recreation and environmental preservation value of the Norfolk Broads: A contingentvaluation study, Report to the National Rivers Authority, Environmental AppraisalGroup, University of East Anglia, pp. 403.

Beattie, J., J. Convey, P. Dolan, L. Hopkins, M. Jones-Lee, G. Loomes, G. Pidgeon, A.


39

Robinson and A. Spencer 1998: On the Contingent Valuation of Safety and the Safetyof Contingent Valuation: Part 1: Caveat Investigator. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,17, 5-25.

Begona Alvarz Farizo, Nick Hanley and Robert Wright (1999) “Estimating the benefits ofagri-environmental policy: econometric issues in open-ended contingent valuationstudies ” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, (42), 23-43.

Brainard, J., Bateman, I J. & Lovett, A.A. (1995) Modelling recreation demand for agro-forestry,in Fischer, M.M., Sikos T. and Bassa, L. (eds.) Recent Developments in SpatialInformation, Modelling and Processing, Geomarket Co. Hungary, pp163-174.

Brainard, J.S., Bateman, I.J. and Lovett, A.A. (1995) How much is a forest worth?, MappingAwareness, 9(9):22-26.

Brainard, J.S., Bateman, I.J. and Lovett, A.A. (forthcoming) Using GIS to implement benefittransfers, in Florax, R.J.G.M., Nijkamp, P. and Willis, K.G. (eds.) ComparativeEnvironmental Economic Assessment: Meta-Analysis and Benefit Transfer, EdwardElgar, Cheltenham.

Brainard, J.S., Lovett, A.A. and Bateman, I.J. (1996) Modelling demand for Woodlandrecreation, CD-ROM proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference on GeographicInformation Systems (GIS ‘96), Vancouver, March 18-21, 1996.

Brainard, J.S., Lovett, A.A. and Bateman, I.J. (1997) Using isochrone surfaces in travel costmodels, Journal of Transport Geography, 5(2): 117-126.

Brainard, J.S., Lovett, A.A. and Bateman, I.J. (1999) Integrating geographical informationsystems into travel cost analysis and benefit transfer, International Journal ofGeographical Information Systems, 13(3): 227-246.

Brouwer, R., Bateman, I.J. and Langford, I.H. (forthcoming) Public perception of health risksassociated with ozone layer depletion, accepted for presentation at The 3rdInternational Public Policy and Social Science Conference: Environmental Risk:Achievements and Challenges, St Catherine's College, University of Oxford, June1999.

Brouwer, R., Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J. and Turner, R.K. (forthcoming) Meta analysis andwetland function values, in Turner, R.K., Bateman, I.J. and Adger, W.N. (eds.)Economics of Coastal and Water Resources: Valuing Environmental Functions, Kluwer,Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

Brouwer, R., Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J., and Turner, R.K., (1999) A meta-analysis ofwetland and aquatic ecosystem valuation studies, presented at The 24th GeneralAssembly of the European Geophysical Society, The Hague, 19-23 April 1999.

Brouwer, R., Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J., and Turner, R.K., (forthcoming) A meta-analysisof wetland contingent valuation studies, Regional Environmental Change.

Brouwer, R., Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J., Crowards, T.C. and Turner, R.K. (1998) Aconventional and multi-level meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies,presented at the Second International Conference of the European Society forEcological Economics: "Ecological Economics and Development", University ofGeneva, 5th and 6th March 1998.

Brouwer, R., Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J., Crowards, T.C. and Turner, R.K. (1997) A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies, CSERGE Global EnvironmentalChange Working Paper 97-20, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the GlobalEnvironment, University of East Anglia and University College London.

Brouwer, R., Powe, N., Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J. and Turner, R.K. (forthcoming) Publicattitudes to contingent valuation and public consultation, Environmental Values, dueVolume 8.3, August 1999.

Brown, R.A. and C.H. Green 1981: "Threats to Health and Safety: Perceived Risk and


40

Willingness to Pay", Social Science and Medicine 15C , 1981, 67-75Buckland S, MacMillan D, Duff E and Hanley N “Estimating mean willingness to payfrom dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies” The Statistician, 48, 109-124,1999.

Burgess D C J Hutchinson W G and Davis J (1998) The economics of animal welfare : Theuse of focus groups in constructing a CV questionnaire (poster presentation)Agricultural Economics Society Post Grad Conference Reading March 1998

Burgess D C J Hutchinson W G and Davis J (1998) Revealing public preferences for animalwelfare. British Society of Animal Science, International Symposium; Farm animalwelfare: who writes the rules? Edinburgh September 1998 Proceedings in BSASOccasional Publication No. 23

Carthy, T. , S. Chilton, T. Carthy, M. Jones-Lee, G. Loomes, J. Covey, A. Spencer, L.Hopkins, N. Pidgeon 1999: On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety ofcontingent valuation: The CV/SG chained approach. Paper Presented at the 9th annualconference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists,Oslo, June 25-27 1999.

Chilton S M and W G Hutchinson (1999) Some further implication s of incorporating thewarm glow of giving into welfare measures; A comment on the use of donationmechanisms by Champ et al., Journal of Environmental Economics and Management37 202 – 209

Chilton S M and Hutchinson W G (1996) Altruistic and Egoistic Preferences and WTP forenvironmental goods. In ; Proceedings of the International Society of EcologicalEconomics. Versailles Conference.

Chilton S M and Hutchinson (1999) Exploring divergence between respondent and researcherdefinition of the good in CV studies. Journal of Agricultural Economics 50(1); 1-16

Costello C Hutchinson W G and Beattie V E (1998) Animal welfare research and the warmglow effect in a CV study. ( poster presentation ) at the Agricultural EconomicsSociety Post Grad Conference Reading March 1998

Costa,P., C.H. Green and S.M. Tunstall 1993: St Mildreds Bay: an assessment of the benefitsof coast protection, Report to Thanet District Council, Enfield: Flood Hazard ResearchCentre

Cox, M. Barbier, E.B. and White P. (1999) Using contingent rating data in a WTP study ofrabies prevention policies in the UK. Paper Presented at the 9th annual conference ofthe European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Oslo, June 25-27 1999.

Cox, M. Barbier, E.B. and White P. (forthcoming) An evaluation of public preferencesregarding rabies prevention measures in the UK, Preventive Veterinary Medicine.

Day, R.J., Langford, I.H., Georgiou, S., Bateman, I.J. and Turner, R.K. (1998) Perceptions ofhealth: Cultural solidarities and willingness to pay for reduction of health risks fromcoastal bathing waters, paper presented at International Conference on Health andRisk, St. Catherine’s College, Oxford, 29 June to 1st July 1998.

DETR 1998: The Environmental Costs and Benefits of the Supply of Aggregates. Departmentof Environment, Transport and the Regions. London Economics, and Mining andEnvironment Research Group - Imperial College, London) London: Her MajestyStationary Office, 1998. ISBN 1-85112-082-3. Executive Summary 12 pp; Full Report248 pp.

Dubgaard, A., Bateman, I.J. and Merlo, M. (eds.) (1995) Economic Valuation of Benefits fromCountryside Stewardship, Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk, Kiel, pp220. (Contains UKvaluation studies of agricultural and forest landscape.)

Dubourg, , W. R. , M. W. Jones-Lee and G. Loomes 1994: Imprecise Preferences and the WTP-


41

WTA Disparity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 9, 115-133.Foster, V., Bateman, I.J. and Harley, D. (1996) A non-experimental comparison of real and

hypothetical willingness to pay, CSERGE Global Environmental Change WorkingPaper 96-10, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment,University of East Anglia and University College London.

Foster, V., Bateman, I.J. and Harley, D. (1997) Real and hypothetical willingness to pay forenvironmental preservation: A non-experimental comparison, Journal of AgriculturalEconomics, 48(2):123-138.

Foster, V., Bateman, I.J. and Harley, D. (1998) Real and hypothetical willingness to pay forenvironmental preservation: A non-experimental comparison, in Acutt, M. and Mason,P. (Eds.) Environmental Valuation, Economic Policy and Sustainability: RecentAdvances in Environmental Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Fouquet, M.-P., C.H. Green and S.M. Tunstall 1991: Hurst Spit: an evaluation of coastprotection benefits, Report to New Forest District Council, Enfield: Flood HazardResearch Centre

Garner, J.L., S M Tunstall and C H Green 1994: Cliftonville: An assessment of coastprotection benefits, Enfield: Flood Hazard Research Centre

Garrod, G and K. Willis 1992: The Environmental Economic Impact of Woodland: A Two-Stage Hedonic Price Model of the Amenity Value of Forestry in Britain. AppliedEconomics, 24, 715-728

Garrod, G. And K. Willis 1996: Estimating the benefits of environmental enhancement: a casestudy of the River Darent, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 39,2; 189-203

Garrod, G and K.G. Willis 1999: Northumbria - Castles, Cathedrals and Towns. In Navrud, S.and R. C. Ready (eds.) 1999: Valuing Cultural Heritage. Applying EnvironmentalValuation Techniques to Historical Buildings, Monuments and Artefacts. Edward ElgarPublishing Ltd., UK. Forthcoming.

Garrod, G., K. Willis, H. Bjarnadottir and P. Cockbain 1996: The Nonpriced Benefits ofRenovating Historic Buildings - A Case Study of Newcastle Grainger Town. Cities, 13(6), 423-430.

Georgiou, S. Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H., Day, R.J. and Turner, R.K. (1998), Coastal bathingwater health risks: Assessing the adequacy of proposals to amend the EC directive,CSERGE Policy Analysis Working Paper PA 98-04, Centre for Social and EconomicResearch on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia and University CollegeLondon.

Georgiou, S. Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J. and Turner, R.K. (1996) Determinants of individualswillingness to pay for reductions in environmental health risks: a case study of bathingwater quality, CSERGE Global Environmental Change Working Paper 96-14, Centrefor Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of EastAnglia and University College London.

Georgiou, S. Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J. and Turner, R.K. (1998) Determinants ofindividuals’ willingness to pay for perceived reductions in environmental health risks: acase study of bathing water quality, Environment and Planning A, 30: 577-594

Georgiou, S., Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H. and Day, R.J. (forthcoming) Coastal bathing waterhealth risks: Assessing the adequacy of proposals to amend the 1976 EC Directive,Risk, Decision and Policy.

Georgiou, S., Langford, I.H. and Bateman, I.J., (1996) Willingness to pay for improved coastalbathing water: A contingent valuation study, Report to the European CommunityCommittee, House of Lords, Houses of Parliament, Centre for Social and Economic


42

Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia and University CollegeLondon.

Georgiou, S., Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J., Day, R. and Turner, R.K. (forthcoming) Publicpreferences for reducing health risks from polluted coastal bathing water in Turner,R.K., Bateman, I.J. and Adger, W.N. (eds.) Economics of Coastal and Water Resources:Valuing Environmental Functions, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

Green, C.H, S.M. Tunstall and M.A. House 1989: Evaluating the benefits of water qualityimprovement in van der Stall, P.M. and van Vught, F. A. (eds) Impact Forecasting andAssessment: Methods, Results and Experiences, Delft University Press, Delft, 1989

Green, C.H. 1992: The economic issues raised by valuing environmental goods in Coker, A.and Richards, C. (eds) Valuing the Environment, London: Bellhaven, 1992

Green, C.H. and S.M. Tunstall 1992: The Amenity and Environmental Value of RiverCorridors in Britain, in Boon, P. J., Calow P. and Petts G.E. (eds) River Conservationand Management, Wiley, Chichester, 1992

Green, C.H. and S.M. Tunstall 1996: The environmental value and attractiveness of rivercorridors, in Bravard J-P, Laurent A-M, Davallon J and Bethemont J (eds.) Lespaysages de l’eau aux portes de la ville, Lyon: Centre Jacques Cartier

Green, C.H. 1997: Are Blue Whales really simply very large cups of coffee?, 7th StockholmWater Symposium, August 1997

Green, C.H., S.M. Tunstall, M. Herring and J. Sawyer 1992: Customer preferences andwillingness to pay for selected water and sewerage services, Report to the Office ofWater Services, Birmingham: OFWAT, 1992 - volume 1: Summary Report; volume2: Technical Report, Birmingham: OFWAT

Gren, I-M., Folke, C., Turner, R.K. and Bateman, I.J., (1994) Primary and secondary values ofwetland ecosystems, Environmental and Resource Economics, 4, 55-74.

Gren, I-M., Folke, C., Turner, R.K. and Bateman, I.J., 1999: Primary and secondary values ofwetland ecosystems, in Willis, K.G., Button, K.J. and Nijkamp, P. (eds.) EnvironmentalAnalysis and Economic Policy: Environmental Valuation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham(due summer 1999).

Han D B, Hutchinson W G and Kim M (1997) Economic impacts of health risk information:A case study of BSE in Korea. International Economics Journal 11 747- 768

Hanley N "Valuing forest characteristics: a comparison of methods" Landscape Research, 19(1), 28-30, 1994.

Hanley N (1988) “Valuing the countryside: rural land use policy evaluation in the UK” HumePapers on Public Policy. 6 (3), 17-37.

Hanley N and Milne J (1996) “Ethical beliefs and behaviour in contingent valuation”.Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 39 (2), 255-272.

Hanley N and Slark R (1994) "Cost-Benefit Analysis of Paper Recycling: A Case Study andSome General Principles". Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 37(2), 189-197.

Hanley N D 1990: The Economics of Nitrate Pollution, European Review of AgriculturalEconomics, 1990, (17), 129-151.

Hanley N D "The Valuation of Environmental Effects: Stage Two", joint SDA/Scottish Officepublication, December 1991.

Hanley N D "Using Contingent Valuation to Value Environmental Improvements" , AppliedEconomics, March 1988

Hanley N D "Valuing non-market goods using contingent valuation: a survey and asynthesis", Journal of Economic Surveys, 3 (3), 1989.

Hanley N D "Valuing rural recreation benefits: an empirical comparison of two approaches",Journal of Agricultural Economics, September 1989


43

Hanley N D & Craig S H "Wilderness development and the Krutilla-Fisher model",Ecological Economics, 1991, 145-164.

Hanley N D and Ruffell R "The Contingent Valuation of Forest Characteristics: TwoExperiments" Journal of Agricultural Economics, May 1993.

Hanley N D and Wright J "Valuing the environment : recent UK experience and anapplication to greenbelt land" Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 35(2) 145-160, 1992.

Hanley N D with A Munro, D Ghosh and D Jamieson "Environmental Economics andSustainable Development in Nature Conservation", Report to NCC, March 1991.

Hanley N, Oglethorpe D and Hussain S (1999) Estimating the value of environmentalfeatures: the ELF benefits transfer model. MAFF, London.

Hanley N, Spash C and Walker L (1995) "Problems in valuing the benefits of biodiversityprotection" Environmental and Resource Economics, 5, 249-272.

Hanley N, Wright R and Adamowicz W (1998) “Using choice experiments to value theenvironment: design issues, current experience and future prospects”. Environmentaland Resource Economics, 11 (3-4), 413-428.

Hanley, N., Douglas MacMillan, Robert. E. Wright, Craig Bullock, Ian Simpson, DaveParsisson and Bob Crabtree “Contingent Valuation versus Choice Experiments:Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland.” Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 1-15, January 1988

Hanley, N. And S. Mourato 1999: Choice modelling approaches: A superior alternative forenvironmental valuation? (includes case study on recreational value of rock climbing).Key note address at the 9th annual conference of the European Association ofEnvironmental and Resource Economists, Oslo, June 25-27 1999.

Harley D and Hanley N (1989) Economic benefit estimates for nature reserves: methods andresults. Discussion Paper in Economics 89/6. Department of Economics, University ofStirling.

Hodge, I and McNally S. 1998: Evaluating the Environment Sensitive Areas. The Value of RuralEnvironments and Policy Relevance. Journal of Rural Studies, 14 (3); 357-367.

House M, Tunstall S, Green C, Portou J and Clarke L 1994 Evaluation of use values fromalleviating low flows, R & D Note 258, Bristol: National Rivers Authority

Hutchinson W G Chilton S M and Davis J (1995) Measuring non use value of environmentalgoods using CVM: Problems of information and cognition and the application ofcognitive questionnaire design methods. Journal of Agricultural Economics 46(1) 97-112

Hutchinson W G Davis J and Chilton S M(1995) Theoretical and spatial limits to the value ofrural environmental benefits. Journal of Rural Studies 11(4) 397-404

Hutchinson W G and Chilton S M (1999) Combining preference ordering and CVM to assessnon market benefits of alternative afforestation projects. Journal of Rural Studies, 15,1; 103 - 109

Hutchinson W G Chilton S M and Davis J (1994) Development and application of methodsto value the non-market benefits and costs of existing forestry and possible futureafforestation programmes in Ireland and Scotland. in: The socio - economic impact ofafforestation on rural development ( eds Dhubhain A and Gardiner J J UniversityCollege Dublin) Final Report on contract no. 8001-CT90-0008 under the EUCAMAR Programme.

Hutchinson W G (1997) Evaluation methods to measure and monitor change in environmentalbenefits from agriculture. In Environmental benefits from agriculture ; Issues andpolicies (eds. OECD ) Paris

Kerr, G.N. and Bateman, I.J. (1997) Response behaviours in multiple-bounded contingent


44

valuation, paper presented at the New Zealand Association of Economists’ AnnualConference, University of Canterbury, August, 1997.

Klein, R.J.T., and Bateman, I.J. (1997) The economic value of recreation as an argumentagainst managed retreat: The case of Cley Marshes Nature Reserve, North Norfolk,presented at the 32nd MAFF Conference of River and Coastal Engineers, Keele (UK),2-4 July 1997.

Klein, R.J.T., and Bateman, I.J. (1998) The recreation value of Cley Marshes Nature Reserve,UK: An argument against managed retreat?, Water and Environmental Management,12(4): 280-285.

Lake, I., Bateman, I.J. and Lovett, A.A. (1997) Visual impact, environmental valuation andhouse prices, presented at GIS Research UK: 5th National Conference (GISRUK '97),Department of Geography, University of Leeds, 9th-11th April 1997.

Lake, I., Bateman, I.J. and Parfitt, J. (1995) A quantitative and willingness to pay assessment of akerbside recycling scheme: A case study of Hethersett, Norfolk, CSERGE WasteManagement Working Paper 95-02, Centre for Social and Economic Research on theGlobal Environment, University of East Anglia and University College London.

Lake, I., Bateman, I.J. and Parfitt, J. (1996) Assessing a kerbside recycling scheme: Aquantitative and willingness to pay case study, Journal of Environmental Management,46, 239-254.

Lake, I., Bateman, I.J. and Parfitt, J. (forthcoming) Assessing a kerbside recycling scheme: Aquantitative and willingness to pay case study, in Pearce, D.W. and Turner, R.K. (eds.)Environmental Benefits Estimation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Lake, I., Bateman, I.J., Lovett, A.A and Langford, I.H. (forthcoming) Valuing noise nuisance:a hedonic pricing approach using GIS, in Pearce, D.W. and Turner, R.K. (eds.)Environmental Benefits Estimation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Lake, I., Lovett, A.A., Bateman, I.J. and Langford, I.H. (1998) Modelling environmentalinfluences on property prices in an urban environment, Computers, Environment andUrban Systems, 22(2), 121-136.

Lake, I., Lovett, A.A., Bateman, I.J. and Langford, I.H. (1998) Modelling environmentalinfluences on property prices in an urban environment (invited paper), GeoComputation 98, University of Bristol.

Langford IH, Georgiou S, Bateman IJ and McDonald AL (1996). Preference construction andwillingness to pay for reductions in risk: a case study on bathing water quality.Proceedings of the Society for Risk Analysis (Europe), pp 165-168. University ofSurrey, UK.

Langford, I.H. and Bateman, I.J. (1993) Welfare measures for contingent valuation studies:estimation and reliability, Global Environmental Change Working Paper 93-04, Centrefor Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Angliaand University College London, pp30.

Langford, I.H., and Bateman, I.J. (1995) Multilevel modelling and contingent valuation, parttwo: Modelling individual and group effects in a dichotomous choice survey, CSERGEGlobal Environmental Change Working Paper 95-05, Centre for Social and EconomicResearch on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia and University CollegeLondon.

Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J. and Langford, H.D. (1994) Multilevel modelling and contingentvaluation, part 1: A triple bounded dichotomous choice analysis, CSERGE GlobalEnvironmental Change Working Paper 94-04, Centre for Social and Economic Researchon the Global Environment, University of East Anglia and University College London,pp19.

Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J. and Langford, H.D. (1996) A multilevel modelling approach to


45

triple-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation, Environmental and ResourceEconomics, 7(3):197-211.

Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J., Jones, A.P. Langford, H.D. and Georgiou, S., (1998) Improvedestimation of willingness to pay in dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies,Land Economics, 74(1): 65-75.

Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J., Jones, A.P. Langford, H.D. and Georgiou, S. (1996) Improvedestimation of willingness to pay in dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies,CSERGE Global Environmental Change Working Paper 96-09, Centre for Social andEconomic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia andUniversity College London.

Langford, I.H., Day, R.J., Georgiou, S. and Bateman, I.J. (forthcoming) A modified sociallearning theory model for predicting individual risk perceptions and preferences,accepted for presentation at The 3rd International Public Policy and Social ScienceConference: Environmental Risk: Achievements and Challenges, St Catherine'sCollege, University of Oxford, June 1999.

Langford, I.H., Day, R.J., Georgiou, S., Bateman, I.J., Turner, R.K. and O'Riordan, T. (1998)Implementing new legislative standards in a democratic society: A case study oncoastal bathing water quality in the United Kingdom, paper presented at theInternational Conference of the Society for Risk Analysis: Communication and RiskAssessment and Management in a Democratic Society, Phoenix, USA, December1998.

Liston-Heyes, C and A. Heyes 1999: Recreational benefits from the Dartmoor National Park.Journal of Environmental Management, 55, 69-80.

Lovett, A.A., Brainard, J.S. and Bateman, I.J. (1997) Improving benefit transfer demandfunctions: a GIS approach, Journal of Environmental Management, 51: 373-389.

MacMillan, D. 1996: Valuing the Environmental Benefits of Reduced Acid Deposition in theSemi-Natural Environment. Ph.D. thesis. University of Stirling.

MacMillan D, Hanley N and Buckland S (1996) “A contingent valuation study of uncertainenvironmental gains” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 43 (5), 519-533.

Maddison, D and S. Mourato 1999: Valuing Different Road Options for the A303 - TheStonehenge study. In Navrud, S. and R. C. Ready (eds.) 1999: Valuing CulturalHeritage. Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historical Buildings,Monuments and Artefacts. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., UK. Forthcoming.

Moss, J.E. S M Chilton W G Hutchinson 1996: A cost benefit analysis of the Mournes andSlieve Croob Environmentally Sensitive Area [ESA] Scheme. Report to Departmentof Agriculture for Northern Ireland. (DANI), Queens University of Belfast, NorthernIreland.

Mourato, S., Bateman, I.J. and Ozdemiroglu, E. (forthcoming) The environmental costs ofriver water abstraction in the UK, in Pearce, D.W. and Turner, R.K. (eds.)Environmental Benefits Estimation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Mourato, S. and D. Pearce 1999: Dealing with low willingness to pay for cultural heritage:Statistical and policy implications. Imperial College. Paper Presented at the 9th annualconference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists,Oslo, June 25-27 1999.

Munro A and N Hanley "Information, Uncertainty and Contingent Valuation" in Bateman, I.J.and Willis, K.G. (eds.) Contingent Valuation of Environmental Preferences:Assessing Theory and Practice in the USA, Europe, and Developing Countries. OxfordUniversity Press.

O´Doherty, R. K. 1996: Contingent Valuation and Benefit Transfer: An assessment in a Local


46

Planning Context. Working Paper in Economics no. 19 May 1996. Faculty ofEconomics and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol.

Pearson, M., I.J. Bateman and G. Codd (forthcoming) Valuing the prevention of toxiccyanobacteria build up: a contingent valuation study of Rutland Water, Leicestershire,in Turner, R.K., I.J. Bateman and W.N. Adger (eds.) Economics of Coastal and WaterResources: Valuing Environmental Functions, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

Penning-Rowsell, E.C., C.H. Green, P.M. Thompson, A.M. Coker, S.M. Tunstall, C.Richards and D.J. Parker 1992: The economics of coastal management: a manual of

assessment techniques, Belhaven, London, 1992 (See also “Inherent conflicts at thecoast”, Journal of coastal conservation (in press) (Grren, C.H: and E.C Penning-Rowsell)

Pennington, G., N. Topham & R. Ward 1990: Aircraft Noise and Residential Property ValuesAdjacent to Manchester International Airport. Journal of Transport Economics andPolicy 24; 44-59.

Pollicino, M and D. Maddison 1999: Valuing the Impacts of Air Pollution on LincolnCathedral. In Navrud, S. and R. C. Ready (eds.) 1999: Valuing Cultural Heritage.Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historical Buildings, Monuments andArtefacts. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., UK. Forthcoming.

Saunders, C., Bateman, I.J., Brouwer, R. and Langford, I.H. (1997) A contingent evaluationof individual and social behaviour towards UV damage and skin cancer, EconomicsSociety of New Zealand Annual Conference, University of Canterbury, New Zealand,August 1997.

Scarpa, R. and Bateman, I.J., (1998) Does a third bound help? Parametric and nonparametricwelfare measures from a CV interval data study, Nota di Lavoro 51.98, FondazioneEni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milan, Italy.

Scarpa, R. and Bateman, I.J., (forthcoming) Does a third bound help? Parametric andnonparametric welfare measures from a CV interval data study, Land Economics.

Scarpa R Chilton S M Hutchinson W G and Buongiorno J (1999) Valuing the recreationalbenefits from the creation of nature reserves in Irish forests. Working paperFondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan Italy

Sowerby K, Jackson S, Green C H, Tunstall S M and Garner J 1996: Monetary valuation ofroad traffic nuisance, report to the Department of Transport, London: JMP Consultants

Spash C. and N. Hanley. 1995. "Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation"Ecological Economics, 12, 191-208.

Sugden, R., Bateman, I.J., Munro, A., Starmer, C. and Turner, R.K., (1996) Identifying andcorrecting for biases in the contingent valuation method, End of Award Report to theEconomic and Social Research Council for award number L119-25-1014, Departmentof Economics, University of East Anglia.

Tapsell, S.M., S M Tunstall, P L Costa and M Fordham 1992: Ravensbourne River Queen’sMead Recreation Ground Survey: Final Report, Reading: Environment Agency

Tapsell, S.M., M Fordham, S M Tunstall, M J Rivilla, J Garner and J Portou 1995: RiverSkerne Public Perception Survey: Stage Two, Huntingdon: River Restoration Project

Tunstall, S.M:, C.H. Green, P. Lewin and A.C. Coker 1990: Herne Bay Coast ProtectionBenefit Assessment: Report III The Recreational Benefit Assessment, Report toCanterbury City Council,), Enfield: Flood Hazard Research Centre

Turner, R.K., Bateman, I.J. and Adger, W.N. (eds.) Economics of Coastal and Water Resources:Valuing Environmental Functions, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

Turner, R.K., Bateman, I.J. and Brooke J.S. (1992) Valuing the benefits of coastal defence: A


47

case study of the Aldeburgh sea defence scheme, in Coker, A. and Richards, C. (eds.)Valuing the Environment: Economic Approaches to Environmental Evaluation,Belhaven Press, pp. 77-100.

Turner, R.K., Brouwer, R., Powe, N., Bateman, I. J.. Langford, I.H. and Ledoux, L.Ecological-Economic Analysis of Wetland Management Options in the NorfolkBroads - Final Report of the UK Case Study in ECOWET: Ecological-EconomicAnalysis of Wetlands; Functions, Values and Dynamics, Report to EC DG VII(Environment), Brussels. May 1999.

Turner, R.K., Folke, C., Gren, I-M. and Bateman, I.J. (1993) Valuation and sustainablemanagement of wetland ecosystems: Three case studies, Joint CSERGE/Beijer InstituteWorking Paper, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment,University of East Anglia and University College London and The Beijer Institute,Stockholm, Sweden.

Turner, R.K., Folke, C., Gren, I-M. and Bateman, I.J., (1995) Wetland valuation: three casestudies, in Perrings, C., Maler, K-G., Folke, C., Holling, C.S., Jansson, B-O. and (eds.)Biodiversity Loss: Economic and Ecological Issues, Cambridge University Press, NewYork (paperback edition published 1997).

Turner, R.K., Langford, I.H. and Bateman, I.J., (1996) Economic and epidemiologicalinvestigation of coastal bathing water health risks, End of Award Report to theEconomic and Social Research Council for award number L320223014, School ofEnvironmental Sciences, University of East Anglia.

Turner, R.K., Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J. and Georgiou, S., (1998) Economic andepidemiological investigation of coastal bathing water risks, Final Report to theEconomic and Social Research Council, ESRC Award No: L320253244, July 1998,Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of EastAnglia and University College London.

Turner, R.K., Lorenzoni, I., Beaumont, N., Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H. and McDonald, A.L.(1997) Coastal management and environmental economics: Analysing environmentaland socio-economic changes on the UK coast, CSERGE Global Environmental ChangeWorking Paper 97-25, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the GlobalEnvironment, University of East Anglia and University College London.

Wasike W and Hanley N (1998) “The pricing of domestic water services in developingcountries: a contingent valuation application to Kenya” International Journal of WaterResources Development, 14 (1), 41-54.

White, P. C. L., K. Gregory, P.J. Linley and G. Richards 1997: Economic values of threatenedmammals in Britain: a case study of the otter Lutra and the water vole Arvicolaterrestris. Biological Conservation 82; 345-354.

White, , P.C. L. and J. C. Lovett 1999: Public preferences and willingness-to-pay for natureconservation in the North York Moors National Park, UK. Journal of EnvironmentalManagement, 55; 1-13.

Willis, K.G. 1990: Valuing non-market wildlife commodities: an evaluation and comparison ofbenefits and costs. Applied Economics, 22; 1,; 12-30.

Willes, K.G. and G.D. Garrod 1991: Valuing open-access recreation on inland waterways.Regional Studies, 25, 6; 511-524.

Willis, K.G. and G.D. Garrod 1993: Valuing landscape: a contingent valuation approach.Journal of Environmental Management, 37; 1-22.

Willis, K.G. and G.D. Garrod 1995: "The Benefits of Alleviating Low Flows in Rivers",Water Resources Development 11, no. 3, 243-260 ,

*Willis, K.G., G.D. Garrod and C.M. Saunders 1995: Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive


48

Area policy in England: a contingent valuation assessment. Journal of EnvironmentalManagement, 44; 105-125.

Willis, K.G., G.D. Garrod, L. Benson and M. Carter 1996: Benefits and costs of the wildlifeenhancement scheme: a case study of the Pevensey Levels, Journal of EnvironmentalPlanning and Management, 39, 3; 387-401.

WRc/OXERA/FHRC 1996 Assessing the benefits of surface water quality improvements:Manual, Marlow: Foundation for Water Research


49

EFTA COUNTRIES

NORWAY (44 studies)

Aae, R. 1995: Rekreasjonsverdien av fritidsfiske etter laks i Drammenselva, sesongen 1994.(Economic value of recreational fishing for atlantic salmon in the River Drammenselvain 1994). In Norwegian. M.Sc. thesis. Department of Economics and Social sciences,Agricultural University of Norway

Bergland, O. 1994: Estimating Oilspill Damages: The Case of Blucher. Mimeo. Department ofEconomics and Social sciences, Agricultural University of Norway.

Bergland, O. 1998: Kan vi sette pris på landskapsopplevelsen? (Can we value the aestheticbeauty of landscapes). In Framstad, E. And I.B. Lid (eds.): Jorbrukets Kulturlandskap.Forvalting av miljøverdier (Agricultural landscape. Management of EnvironmentalValues), pp. 171-176.. In Norwegian

Bergland, O. 1998: Verdsetjing av estetiske verdiar i tilknytning til tersklar i regulertevassdrag (Valuing aesthetic effects of weirs in regulated water courses). Report 051998. Norwegian Water and Electricity Board (NVE) - Vassdragsavdelingen, Oslo. InNorwegian.

Bergland, O. And K. Magnussen 1997: Verdsetting av komplekse, lokale miljøgoder.(Valuingcomplex, local environmental goods). Mimeo. Department of Economics and Socialsciences, Agricultural University of Norway.

Bergland, O., K. Magnussen and S. Navrud 1995: Benefit transfer: Testing for Accuracy andReliability. Discussion Paper D-03/95, Department of Economics and Social Sciences.Agricultural University of Norway. Paper presented at the sixth annual conference ofThe European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (EAERE),Umeaa, Sweden, June 17-20, 1995. Forthcoming in Florax, R.J.G.M., P. Nijkamp andK. Willis (eds.) 1999: Comparative Environmental Economic Assessment: MetaAnalysis and Benefit Transfer. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Braastad, B. And T. Neset 1995: En samfunnsøkonomisk analyse av Verneplan for SetesdalVesthei / Ryfylkeheiane 1995. (An economic analysis of the preservation plan forSetesdal Vesthei/ Ryfylkeheiane 1995). In Norwegian. M.Sc. thesis, Department ofEconomics and Social sciences, Agricultural University of Norway.

Bye, I and K. Andersen 1996: Verdsetting av lokale miljøproblemer fra vegtrafikk (Valuinglocal environmental problems from road traffic). In Norwegian. M.Sc. thesis.Department of Economics and Social sciences, Agricultural University of Norway..

Eriksen, E. 1998: Økonomisk verdsetting av risko ved rasfare (The Economic Valuation ofRisk of Avalanches).In Norwegian. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Economics andSocial sciences, Agricultural University of Norway.

Grue, B, J.L. Langeland & O.I. Larsen 1997: Boligpriser - effekter av veitrafikkbelastning oglokalisering.(Property Prices - Impacts of road traffic and siting). TØI-report351/1997. Institute for Transport Economics (TØI), Oslo, 43 p.. In Norwegian.

Gurholt, I.M. 1998: Verdsetting av miljømessige effekter av høyspentledninger (ValuingEnvironmental Impacts from Transmission Lines). In Norwegian. M.Sc. Thesis.Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway. InNorwegian.

Hagestuen, W and K. Skogen 1995: Samfunnsøkonomisk Verdi av Naturressursene i


50

Ullensvang Statsalmenning, Hardangervidda. (Economic Value of Natural Resourcesin the Ullensvang Crown lands, Hardangervidda National Park). In Norwegian. M.Sc.thesis. Department of Economics and Social sciences, Agricultural University ofNorway

Halvorsen, B. 1996: Ordering Effects in Contingent Valuation Surveys. Willingness to Payfor Reduced Health Damage from Air Pollution. Environmental and ResourceEconomics., 8(4); 485-499.

Hansesveen,H. and G. Helgås 1997: Estimering av miljøkostnader ved en vannkraftutbyggingi Øvre Otta - en betalingsvillighetsundersøkelse (Environmental Costs of HydropowerDevelopment - A Contingent Valuation Study). In Norwegian. M.Sc. thesis.Department of Economics and Social sciences, Agricultural University of Norway

Helgheim, J. and H. Kjerkol 1999: Avfall - en ressurs og et problem- Et betingetverdsettingsstudium for kartlegging av eksterne effekter ved avfallsforbrenning i Skisentrum. (Waste - A resource and a problem. A Contingent Valuation Study; theexternal costs of combustion of waste in the community of Ski). In Norwegian. M.Sc.thesis. Department of Economics and Social sciences, Agricultural University ofNorway

Klynderud, K. H. 1994: Verdsetting av miljøendringer i Aulivassdraget. (Valuation ofenvironmental changes in the Auli watercourse). In Norwegian. M.Sc. thesis,Department of Economics and Social sciences, Agricultural University of Norway.

Knudsen, T., S-M. Svalheim og S. Navrud 1998: Miljøtiltak til havs er lønnsomt.(Environmental measures in the off-shore industry are profitable). In Norwegian.Teknisk Ukeblad, (Weekly Journal of Engineering) no 11-98; 30-32.

Langgård, B. And J. Bossum 1996: Verdsetting av estetisk kvalitetsforbedring av bybildet. Enstudie i Fredrikstad (Valuing aesthetic improvements in cities - A study ofFredrikstad). In Norwegian. M.Sc. thesis. Department of Economics and Socialsciences, Agricultural University of Norway

Leidal, K. 1996: Verdsetting av et bynært område: En betinget verdsettingsstudie av områdetrundt Eigevannet i Kristiansand kommune (Valuing an urban recreational area: AContingent Valuation Study of Lake Eige in Kristiansand). In Norwegian. M.Sc.thesis. Department of Economics and Social sciences, Agricultural University ofNorway.

Lindhjem, H. 1998: Betalingsvillighet for bedret vannkvalitet i Steinsfjorden. En BetingetVerdsettingsstudie. (Willingness-to-pay for improved water quality in the Steins Fjord.A Contingent Valuation Study). In Norwegian. M.Sc. thesis, Department ofEconomics and Social sciences, Agricultural University of Norway.

Luktvasslimo, S and O. M. Andersen Berg 1998: Rovdyr og sau - en økonomisk analyse. (Bigcarnivores and sheep - an economic analysis). In Norwegian. M.Sc. thesis. Departmentof Economics and Social sciences, Agricultural University of Norway

Magnussen, K. 1997: Miljømål for vannforekomstene. Vurdering av nytten ved åopprettholde eller forbedre miljøkvalitet.(Environmental Goals for Freshwater. Anevaluation of the benefits of maintaining or improving environmental quality). InNorwegian. Report 97:36. National Pollution Control Authority (SFT), Oslo.

Magnussen, K. And O. Bergland 1996: Verdsetting av miljøgifter i vann. (Valuing toxicsubstances in water). In Norwegian. Report OR 51.96. Stiftelsen Østfoldforskning(STØ), Fredrikstad.

Navrud, S. & K. Veisten 1996: Using Contingent Valuation and actual donations to boundthe true willingness-to-pay. Paper presented at the European Association ofEnvironmental and Resource Economists (EAERE) annual conference in Lisbon,June 1996.


51

Navrud, S. 1993: Miljøkostnader av vannkraftutbyggingen i Sauda. En betalingsvillighets-undersøkelse. (Environmental Costs from Hydro Power Development in Sauda. AContingent Valuation Study) . In Norwegian. Report to the Royal Norwegian Ministryof Environment. November 1993.

Navrud, S. 1997: Communication Devices In Contingent Valuation Surveys - ExperimentsWith Video. Chapter 11 (p. 273-298) in R.J. Kopp, W.W. Pommerehne & N. Schwartz(eds.) 1997: Determining The Value of Non-Marketed Goods. Studies in Risk andUncertainty -series. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordrecht/London.

Navrud, S. (ed.) 1994: External costs of fuel cycles. (ExternE). National implementation ofthe hydro-electric fuel cycle in Norway. Report to DG XII of the Commission of theEuropean Community (CEC), ENCO a.s. Published in European Commission-DGXII1996: ExternE - Externalities of Energy. Volume 6: Wind and Hydro, pp. 127-249.

Navrud, S. 1994: Economic valuation of the external costs of fuel cycles. Testing the benefittransfer approach. In A.T. Almeida (ed.): Models for Integrated Electricity ResourcePlanning. PP. 49-66. Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands.

Navrud, S. 1997: Communication Devices in Contingent Valuation Surveys - Experimentswith video. Chapter 11 in Kopp. R.J., W.-W. Pommerehne and N. Schwartz (eds.)1997: Determining the Value of Non-marketed Goods: Economics, Psychological andPolicy Relevant Aspects of contingent Valuation, Kluwer Academic Publishers,Holland.

Navrud, S. 1997: Luftforurensninger - effekter og verdier (LEVE). Betalingsvillighet for åunngå helseeffekter, støy og forsuring. (Air Pollution- impacts and values.Willingness-to-Pay to avoid health impacts (morbidity), road traffic noise andacidification impacts on freshwater fish stocks). In Norwegian. Report 97:14. NationalPollution Control Authority.

Navrud, S. 1998: Valuing health impacts from air pollution in Europe. New empiricalevidence on morbidity. Paper presented at the First World Congress forEnvironmental and Resource Economists, Venice, June 25.-27 1998. Forthcoming inEnvironmental and Resource Economics.

Navrud, S. 1999: Linking Physical and Economic Indicators of Environmental Damage. AcidDepositions in Norway. In C. L. Spash and S. McNally (eds.) 1999: Case Studies inEcological and Environmental Economics. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Pedersen, H. 1995: Rekreasjonsverdien av fisket i Dokka/Etna for 1993- og 1994-sesongen.(Economic Value of recreational fishing in the River Dokka/Etna in theseasons 1993 and 1994). In Norwegian. M.Sc. thesis. Department of Economics andSocial sciences, Agricultural University of Norway

Ready R.C. , S. Navrud and R.C. Dubourg 1998: How Do Respondents with Uncertain WTPAnswer CV Questions? Paper accepted for presentation at the Annual Conference ofthe European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Oslo, June 25-27, 1999

Ready, R and S. Navrud 1999: An Exposure-Response Model for the City of Oslo inNorway,and Valuation of Benefits from Reductions in Air Pollution. In Final Report of the EC-DGXII project: Benefits Transfer and the Economic Valuation of EnvironmentalDamage in the European Union: With Special Reference to health..

Saelensminde, K. & F. Hammer 1994: Verdsetting av miljøgoder ved bruk avsamvalgsanalyse. Hovedundersøkelse.(Valuing environmental goods using conjointanalysis . Main survey). In Norwegian. TO Report 251/1994. Institute for TransportEconomics (TØI)

Saelensminde, K. 1995: Stated preference methods. Methodological problems and results


52

from a conjoint analysis survey. Institute for Transport Economics (TØI), Oslo ,Unpublished.

Strand, J. and M. Vagnes 1997: The Relationship Between Property Values and RailroadProximity: A Study Based on Hedonic Prices and Real Estate Brokers´ Appraisals.Report to the Norwegian State Railroads (NSB). ENCO Environmental Consultants,Lysaker, Norway.

Stamer Wahl, T. 1997: Verdsetting av kommunale friområder i Oslo. En BetingetVerdsettingsstudie. (Valuing community owned recreational areas in Oslo- AContingent Valuation Study) In Norwegian. M.Sc. thesis. Department of Economics,University of Oslo.

Svarva Nielsen, F. And L. I . Vestby 1995: Rekreasjonsverdien av fritidsfisket etter ørret ideler av Dokkavassdraget og holdninger til fiskestelltiltak (Economic value ofrecreational fishing for trout in parts of the Dokka River system and attitudes towardsfish management plans). In Norwegian. M.Sc. thesis. Department of Economics andSocial sciences, Agricultural University of Norway

Thune-Larsen, H. 1995: Flystøyavgifter basert på betalingsvillighet. (Air craft noise taxesbased on willingness-to-pay). In Norwegian. TOI-report 289/1995. Institute forTransport Economics (TØI), Oslo. 86 p.

Tronstad; A. 1993: Holdninger til og betalingsvillighet for jordbrukslandskapet. (Attitudestowards and willingness-to-pay for Agricultural landscape). In Norwegian. M.Sc.thesis. Department of Economics and Social sciences, Agricultural University ofNorway

Veisten, K. H.F. Hoen, S. Navrud and J. Strand 1993: Valuing Biodiversity in NorwegianForests: A Contingent Valuation Study with multiple bias testing. Paper presented atthe fourth annual conference of the European Association of Environmental andResource Economists (EAERE) at INSEAD, Fontaine-bleau, France, June 30 -July 3,1993, 22 pp.

Vågnes, M 1996: Om verdsetting av miljøgoder. Case: kraftlinjer (On valuatingenvironmental goods. Case: Electric transmission lines). In Norwegian. M.Sc. thesis.Department of Economics, University of Oslo.

SWITZERLAND (16 studies)

Iten, R. 1990. Die mikroökonomische bewertung von Veränderungen der Umweltqualitet.Dargestellt am beispiel der stadt Zürich (The microeconomic valuation of changes ofenvironmental quality. Demonstrated in the case of the city of Zürich). In German. ISchriftreihe des Instituts für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung der Universität Zürich,Bd. 20, Schellenberg, winterhur, 142 s.

Jeanrenaud,C, N. Soguel, F. Priez and N. Schwab Christe. 1997. L’analyse des biais dans laméthode de l’évaluation contingente (Analysing some contingent valuation biases],Rapport final au Fonds national suisse de la recherche scientifique, Project 1214-040637.94. In French.

Nielsen, C. 1991. Der Erholungswert stadnaeher Wäldere im Kanton Tessin. Eineökonomische Analyse am Beispiel Lugano. (The Recreational Value of urban forestareas in the county of Tessin. An Economic Analysis of a case area in Lugano). InGerman. Bundesamt für Wumwelt-Wald und Landschaft-Schriftsreihe Umwelt no.146, Bern.


53

Soguel, N. 1991. Evaluation du coût social du bruit généré par le trafic routier en ville deNeuchâtel (Social Costs of road traffic noise in Neuchâtel). In French. Institut derecherches economiques de regionales (IRER), University of Neuchatel, Switzerland.IRER Working papers no. 9105, 50 p.

Soguel, N. 1994. Evaluation monétaire des atteintes à l'environnement : Une étude hédonisteet contingente sur l'impact des transports, (Valuing environmental damages : ahedonic and contingent study of transport impacts), EDES, Neuchâtel. In French.

Soguel, N. 1995. Costing the Traffic Barrier Effect : A Contingent Valuation Survey,Environmental and Resource Economics, (6) 301-308.

Soguel, N. 1996. Contingent Valuation of Traffic Noise Reduction Benefits, Swiss Journal ofEconomics and Statistics, 132(1) 109-123.

Soguel, N. 1997. Economic Assessment of Damage to Cultural Heritage, in Kucera V., PearceD. and Brodin Y.W., Economic Evaluation of Air Pollution Damage to Material,Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Report 4761, 110-120, 1997.

Soguel, N. 1998. Contingent Valuation of Traffic Noise Reduction Benefits, in K.J. Buttonand Nijkamp P. 1998: Environmental Analysis and Economic Policy Edward ElgarPublishing., UK.

Soguel, N. and P. Grosclaude. 1994. Valuing Damages to Historic Buildings Using aContingent Market : A Case Study of Road Traffic Externalities , Journal ofEnvironmental Planning and Management, 37(3) 279-287.

Soguel, N. and C. Jeanrenaud. 1999. Valuing the Cost of Smoking, Kluwer AcademicPublishers, Boston.

Soguel, N. and N. Schwab 1995: Le prix de la souffrance et du chagrin : une évaluationcontingente appliquée aux accidents de la route, (The price of pain and grief : a roadaccident contingent valuation), EDES, Neuchâtel. In French.

Soguel, N. and N. Schwab. 1996. The Pain of Road-Accident Victims and the Bereavementof their Relatives : A Contingent Valuation Experiment », Journal of Risk andUncertainty, 13(3) 277-291.

Soguel, N. and N. Schwab. 1995. Contingent Valuation, Transport Safety and the Value ofLife (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

Soguel, Nils and Pascal van Griethuysen. 1999. A contingent valuation of damage to health:the case of waste incinerators’ air pollution. Cahier de l‘Institut de hautes études enadministration publique, Lausanne.

Soguel, Nils and Jean-Louis Zufferey. 1997. Evaluation contingente et estimation du coûtsocial des accidents de la route, (Contingent valuation and road accidents social cost :a conceptual perspective) Mandat de recherche 286 du Service d’étude des transportsdu DFTCE et de l’Office fédéral de la statistique.


54

CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

BULGARIA (1 study)

Mourato, S. and A. Danchev 1997: Preserving Cultural Heritage in Transition Economies: AContingent Valuation Study of Bulgarian Monastries. CSERGE Working Paper.Report to the European Commission DG XII.

CROATIA (2 studies)

Horak, S and P. Tadej 1995: Evaluation of Forests in Croatian Coastal Tourism. Institute ofTourism, Zagreb, Croatia., 40 pp + appendices.

Pagiola, S. 1999: Valuing the Benefits of Investments in Cultural Heritage: The Historic Coreof Split. Environment Department, The World Bank, Washington D.C.. Paperpresented at the World Bank Economists' Forum Alexandria, May 3-4, 1999

CZECH REPUBLIC (1 study)

Tosovska, E. 1996: Application of an nonconventional valuation method to environmentalcomponent quality. Prague Economic Papers 1996, 1; 41-53.

HUNGARY (1 study)

Vari, Anna 1999: Development of flood control in Hungary: questionnaire survey of thewillingness to pay among the affected population, Budapest: MTA Research Instituteof Sociology.

LATVIA (1 study)

Ready, R.C., J. Malzubris and S. Senkane 1998: Use of Contingent Valuation to ValueEnvironmental Improvements in a Transition Economy: Water Quality Improvementin Latvia.. Paper preseneted at the 1st World Congress of Environmental andResosource Economists, Venice, June 1998. (Also report to Harvard Institute forInternational Development).


55

POLAND (7 studies)

Markowska, A. and T. Zylicz 1999: Costing an international public good: The case of theBaltic Sea. Ecological Economics. Forthcoming.

Turner, R.K., Georgiou, S. and Bateman, I.J. 1999: Valuation and management of nutrientpollution in the Baltic drainage basin, in Turner, R.K., Bateman, I.J. and Adger, W.N.(eds.) Economics of Coastal and Water Resources: Valuing Environmental Functions,Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Forthcoming

Zylicz, T. 1997: Economic Values and Policy Implications. In A. Nordgren (ed.) 1997,Science, Ethics, Sustainability: The Responsibility of Science in AttainingSustainable Development, Uppsala University, pp. 105-114

Zylicz, T. 1999: Costing Poland's Nature: Case Studies from a Transition Economy. EdwardElgar, Cheltenham, UK. Forthcoming.

Zylicz, T., Bateman, I.J., Georgiou, S. and Markowska, A. (forthcoming) Contingent valuationof eutrophication damage in the Baltic Sea region: results of a household survey,CSERGE Global Environmental Change Working Paper series, Centre for Social andEconomic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia andUniversity College London.

Zylicz, T., Bateman, I.J., Georgiou, S., Markowska, A., Dziegielewska, D., Turner, R.K.,Graham, A. and Langford, I.H. (1995) The Baltic drainage basin project: Contingentvaluation of eutrophication damage in the Baltic Sea region, CSERGE GlobalEnvironmental Change Working Paper 95-03, Centre for Social and Economic Researchon the Global Environment, University of East Anglia and University College London.

Zylicz, T., Bateman, I.J., Georgiou, S., Markowska, A., Dziegielewska, D., Turner, R.K.,Graham, A. and Langford, I.H. (1995) The Baltic drainage basin project: Contingentvaluation of eutrophication damage in the Baltic Sea region, CSERGE GlobalEnvironmental Change Working Paper 95-03, Centre for Social and Economic Researchon the Global Environment, University of East Anglia and University College London.

list of european valuation studies - european commission · list of european valuation studies 1....

Documents