market-driven conservation: social issues in certification schemes for capture fisheries chandrika...
TRANSCRIPT
Market-driven conservation: Social issues in certification
schemes for capture fisheries
Chandrika SharmaInternational Collective in Support of
Fishworkers (ICSF)
• Fish and fish products most traded food commodity.
• About half of global fish production for food consumption traded
• Developing countries contribute 50 per cent (quantity) and 46 per cent (value) of the world exports of fish and fishery products
Fish Trade
• Growing concern about status of fish stocks spurred ecolabelling initiatives
• Aim to use market incentives to – promote consumer demand for fish caught
in environmentally sustainable ways– reward producers practising responsible
fisheries
Ecolabelling
• Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)
• Friends of the Sea (FOS)
• Naturland
• Dolphin-safe (EII)
• KRAV (Swedish ecolabel for wild-caught seafood, life-cycle assessment)
Ecolabelling Schemes
• Fairfish (animal welfare, sustainability and fair trade)
• Carrefour (French supermarket chain: own label “peche responsable”)
• Industry schemes: Canada, UK, Iceland (proposed)...
• Fishermen-led labels (Breton fishers, blue crab, Thailand, catch shares, USA…)
Ecolabelling Schemes
• First party labeling (self-declaration regarding adherence to own standards)
• Second party labeling (established by industry associations for their members products, internal audit procedures or audit by external certifying companies)
• Third party labeling (independent certification, high credibility)
Ecolabelling Schemes
• Proliferation of ecolabels, concerns of developing countries regarding trade barriers
• Led to 2005 FAO “Guidelines for the Ecolabelling of Fish and Fishery Products from Marine Capture Fisheries”.
• Set out principles, minimum requirements and criteria--provide a benchmark against which schemes can be compared.
FAO Guidelines
• Specify that ecolabelling schemes should be voluntary, transparent, non-discriminatory, and should recognize the special conditions applying to developing countries.
• Recommend independent, third party certification
• Three substantive minimum requirements: the fisheries management system, the status of the target stocks, and ecosystem considerations
FAO Guidelines
• Claims to be the main seafood certification scheme—more than 10mn MT of wild catch assessed (including non-food fish)
• Certified products from all continents including Morocco. Maldives, Sri Lanka, Senegal, Brazil, Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam (tuna, shrimp, squid, sardines, cuttlefish, clam)
• Claims to be the only scheme that follows the FAO Guidelines
Friends of the Sea
• Has developed “Standards for Sustainable Capture Fishery”
• Explicitly aligned with the three dimensions of sustainability (social, ecological, and economic). Addresses issues of livelihoods, fair working conditions
• Recent initiative: Lake Victoria Nile Perch
Naturland Germany
• Focus only on environmental sustainability
• 42 fisheries certified during the first ten years of MSC certification
• About 4 mn MT of seafood certified—over 7% of total global capture production for direct human consumption
• Real volume of MSC-labeled products is likely to be less than 1% of global fish (Globefish study)
Marine Stewardship Council
• Concentrated markets—5 markets (UK, USA, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland) account for 3/4 of MSC sales
• Popular in certain kinds of markets (aware population, supermarket shares high, demand for processed products high...)
• Concentrated species—about 50% of MSC products are hake type fish, 42% is Alaska salmon
• Information from Globefish study
Marine Stewardship Council
• Few examples of MSC certified fisheries (South African hake, Mexican Baja California spiny lobster)
• Certification is difficult (data deficiencies, weak fisheries management, costs prohibitive, multi-species fisheries)
• No immediate economic imperative/ perceived threat
MSC and developing countries
• Developing World Fisheries Programme to address data-deficient fisheries/ SSF
• Assessment guidelines include the use of TEK and traditional management systems, and risk assessment component for data-deficient fisheries
• Certified Ben Tre Vietnamese clam fisheries, India oil sardine fishery in Kerala being assessed
• Will MSC be able to certify large catch fisheries, operating within a multi-species regime, in developing countries?
MSC and developing countries
• No clear evidence of price premiums accruing to producers, though markets are are likely to be more secured/ assured/ new markets
• Producers assume the bulk of the costs of certification
• Information from Globefish study
Certification: Benefit to Producers?
• Certification often of fishery that is already sustainable (countries of the North are better able to meet the standards)
• Globefish study found that retailers (Walmart, Marks and Spencers, Sainsbury, Tesco, Metro, Carrefour, Lidl, ICA Sweden) committed to ecolabelling (mainly MSC), see it as a marketing tool, good publicity, CSR
Other issues
• Bangkok statement (2008): “Reject ecolabelling schemes, while recognizing area-specific labeling that identifies socially and ecologically sustainable fisheries”
• Reject narrow focus on environmental sustainability only—most fisheries certified are industrial fisheries, often under quota management, that marginalize SSF
Can SSF benefit?
Short-term
• Build on comparative advantages (rich culture, traditional knowledge systems, sustainable small-scale gear, unique processing techniques, use of sails/ wind power), support their certification, promote niche markets (incl. domestic mkts)
• Work in partnership with communities/ fishworker organizations
What can be done?
Short-term• Support self-certification initiatives by small-
scale fishers and fish processors (eg. improve management/ enforcement, technology/ inputs)
• Explore schemes that balance various dimensions of sustainability (environmental, social and economic)
• Explore Geographic indications (GIs) (e.g., nuoc mam anchovy fish sauce from Phu Quoc, Viet Nam)
What can be done?
Long-term
• Need to proactively improve fisheries management, balancing biological, social and economic objectives
• Management methods should draw on traditional knowledge, co-management approaches, keeping in mid multi-species nature of fisheries and diverse local cultures
What can be done?
Thank you