mary sowers nasddds july 14, 2014 nasddds national association of state directors of developmental...

78
Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 SDDDS Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services co Street, Alexandria, VA 22314 683·4202; Fax: 703·684·1395 nasddds.org

Upload: karen-oddy

Post on 15-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Mary SowersNASDDDS

July 14 2014

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services113 Oronoco Street Alexandria VA 22314Tel 7036834202 Fax 7036841395Web wwwnasdddsorg

Medicaid Basics Medicaid HCBS Basics Medicaid Authorities Opportunities for

Assistive Technology Coverage New HCBS Regulations Questions

2

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Medicaid can be an important source of public financing for assistive technology

In addition to medical and rehabilitative uses AT can also play a key role in assisting individuals return to or remain in their homes and communities and avoid institutional utilization

To understand how AT is covered in Medicaid it is important to understand some Medicaid basics

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Established in 1965 as a companion program to Medicare

ldquoGrants to States for Medical Assistance Programsrdquo ndash Medicaid

FederalState entitlement partnership program

Medicaid mandates some eligibility groups and services States may elect to include other groups and benefits

4

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Medicaid State Plan has historically referred to the list of services (both mandatory and optional) identified in Section 1905(a) of the statute

With additions to the SSA a statersquos Medicaid State Plan can include more services and benefits than those in 1905(a)

There are now HCBS state plan benefits described more fully below at 1915(i) and 1915(k) of the SSA

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Under the traditional Medicaid State Plan states often cover some AT through Home Health Services andor Durable Medical Equipment

Coverage and payment for items varies by state Medically-necessary DME for use in the home or to

function in the community States may have a list of preapproved items with established process for modifications or exceptions

Sometimes access can be complex especially for individuals eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States may offer HCBS through a number of statutory authorities as well as some time-limited grant programs

Increased demand from individuals and families the Olmstead decision other litigation and DOJ enforcement has spurred significant growth in HCBS over the past decade

The two primary HCBS sources for AT include 1915(c) HCBS waivers and 1915(i) HCBS as a State Plan Option

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act originally enacted in 1981 (with some amendments since then) remains the predominant vehicle for the delivery of HCBS More than 300 waivers serving more than 1

million people In federal fiscal year (FFY) 2011 total state and

federal expenditures for Section1915(c) waiver programs totaled nearly $38 billion1

1 CMS Truven Health Analytics Medicaid Expenditures For Section 1915(c) Waiver Programs In FFY 2011 Steve Eiken Brian Burwell Lisa Gold Kate Sredl Paul Saucier October 2013

8

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Title XIX permits the Secretary of Health amp Human Servicesto waive certain provisions required through the regular State Plan process For 1915(c) HCBS waivers the provisions that can

be waived are related to Comparability (amount duration and scope) ndash

provides ability to target benefit Statewideness Income and resource requirements

9

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Permits States to provide HCBS to people who would otherwise require Nursing Facility (NF) Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded (ICFsMR) or hospital Level of Care (LOC)

Serves diverse target groups ndash including individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities individuals with physical disabilities individual who are aging and those with mental health support needs

Services can be provided on a less than Statewide basis

Allows for participant-direction of services

10

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Costs HCBS must be ldquocost neutralrdquo as compared to institutional services on average for the individuals enrolled in the waiver

LOC Institutional levels of care define waiver LOC and the populations that may be targeted

Choice HCBS participants must have the choice of all willing and qualified providers

11

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Home Health Aide Personal Care Case Management Adult Day Health Habilitation Homemaker Respite CareFor chronic mental illness Day TreatmentPartial Hospitalization Psychosocial Rehabilitation Clinic Services AND Other Services ndash can be State-

proposed service specifications

12

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

AT is commonly covered in 1915(c) waivers States cover a wide array of technology

including commercially available technology when it is addressing an identified need in an individualrsquos plan of care

States frequently include annual multi-year andor lifetime dollar limits on AT

Prior authorization is also common for technology costing over certain amounts

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS offers the following Core Service Definition for Assistive Technology but states may amendchange as needed

Assistive technology device means an item piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially modified or customized that is used to increase maintain or improve functional capabilities of participants Assistive technology service means a service that directly assists a participant in the selection acquisition or use of an assistive technology device Assistive technology includes-- (A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of a participant including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology and appropriate services to the participant in the customary environment of the participant (B) services consisting of purchasing leasing or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices for participants (C) services consisting of selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing assistive technology devices (D) coordination and use of necessary therapies interventions or services with assistive technology devices such as therapies interventions or services associated with other services in the service plan (E) training or technical assistance for the participant or where appropriate the family members guardians advocates or authorized representatives of the participant and (F) training or technical assistance for professionals or other individuals who provide services to employ or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of participants

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 2: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Medicaid Basics Medicaid HCBS Basics Medicaid Authorities Opportunities for

Assistive Technology Coverage New HCBS Regulations Questions

2

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Medicaid can be an important source of public financing for assistive technology

In addition to medical and rehabilitative uses AT can also play a key role in assisting individuals return to or remain in their homes and communities and avoid institutional utilization

To understand how AT is covered in Medicaid it is important to understand some Medicaid basics

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Established in 1965 as a companion program to Medicare

ldquoGrants to States for Medical Assistance Programsrdquo ndash Medicaid

FederalState entitlement partnership program

Medicaid mandates some eligibility groups and services States may elect to include other groups and benefits

4

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Medicaid State Plan has historically referred to the list of services (both mandatory and optional) identified in Section 1905(a) of the statute

With additions to the SSA a statersquos Medicaid State Plan can include more services and benefits than those in 1905(a)

There are now HCBS state plan benefits described more fully below at 1915(i) and 1915(k) of the SSA

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Under the traditional Medicaid State Plan states often cover some AT through Home Health Services andor Durable Medical Equipment

Coverage and payment for items varies by state Medically-necessary DME for use in the home or to

function in the community States may have a list of preapproved items with established process for modifications or exceptions

Sometimes access can be complex especially for individuals eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States may offer HCBS through a number of statutory authorities as well as some time-limited grant programs

Increased demand from individuals and families the Olmstead decision other litigation and DOJ enforcement has spurred significant growth in HCBS over the past decade

The two primary HCBS sources for AT include 1915(c) HCBS waivers and 1915(i) HCBS as a State Plan Option

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act originally enacted in 1981 (with some amendments since then) remains the predominant vehicle for the delivery of HCBS More than 300 waivers serving more than 1

million people In federal fiscal year (FFY) 2011 total state and

federal expenditures for Section1915(c) waiver programs totaled nearly $38 billion1

1 CMS Truven Health Analytics Medicaid Expenditures For Section 1915(c) Waiver Programs In FFY 2011 Steve Eiken Brian Burwell Lisa Gold Kate Sredl Paul Saucier October 2013

8

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Title XIX permits the Secretary of Health amp Human Servicesto waive certain provisions required through the regular State Plan process For 1915(c) HCBS waivers the provisions that can

be waived are related to Comparability (amount duration and scope) ndash

provides ability to target benefit Statewideness Income and resource requirements

9

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Permits States to provide HCBS to people who would otherwise require Nursing Facility (NF) Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded (ICFsMR) or hospital Level of Care (LOC)

Serves diverse target groups ndash including individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities individuals with physical disabilities individual who are aging and those with mental health support needs

Services can be provided on a less than Statewide basis

Allows for participant-direction of services

10

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Costs HCBS must be ldquocost neutralrdquo as compared to institutional services on average for the individuals enrolled in the waiver

LOC Institutional levels of care define waiver LOC and the populations that may be targeted

Choice HCBS participants must have the choice of all willing and qualified providers

11

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Home Health Aide Personal Care Case Management Adult Day Health Habilitation Homemaker Respite CareFor chronic mental illness Day TreatmentPartial Hospitalization Psychosocial Rehabilitation Clinic Services AND Other Services ndash can be State-

proposed service specifications

12

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

AT is commonly covered in 1915(c) waivers States cover a wide array of technology

including commercially available technology when it is addressing an identified need in an individualrsquos plan of care

States frequently include annual multi-year andor lifetime dollar limits on AT

Prior authorization is also common for technology costing over certain amounts

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS offers the following Core Service Definition for Assistive Technology but states may amendchange as needed

Assistive technology device means an item piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially modified or customized that is used to increase maintain or improve functional capabilities of participants Assistive technology service means a service that directly assists a participant in the selection acquisition or use of an assistive technology device Assistive technology includes-- (A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of a participant including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology and appropriate services to the participant in the customary environment of the participant (B) services consisting of purchasing leasing or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices for participants (C) services consisting of selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing assistive technology devices (D) coordination and use of necessary therapies interventions or services with assistive technology devices such as therapies interventions or services associated with other services in the service plan (E) training or technical assistance for the participant or where appropriate the family members guardians advocates or authorized representatives of the participant and (F) training or technical assistance for professionals or other individuals who provide services to employ or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of participants

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 3: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Medicaid can be an important source of public financing for assistive technology

In addition to medical and rehabilitative uses AT can also play a key role in assisting individuals return to or remain in their homes and communities and avoid institutional utilization

To understand how AT is covered in Medicaid it is important to understand some Medicaid basics

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Established in 1965 as a companion program to Medicare

ldquoGrants to States for Medical Assistance Programsrdquo ndash Medicaid

FederalState entitlement partnership program

Medicaid mandates some eligibility groups and services States may elect to include other groups and benefits

4

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Medicaid State Plan has historically referred to the list of services (both mandatory and optional) identified in Section 1905(a) of the statute

With additions to the SSA a statersquos Medicaid State Plan can include more services and benefits than those in 1905(a)

There are now HCBS state plan benefits described more fully below at 1915(i) and 1915(k) of the SSA

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Under the traditional Medicaid State Plan states often cover some AT through Home Health Services andor Durable Medical Equipment

Coverage and payment for items varies by state Medically-necessary DME for use in the home or to

function in the community States may have a list of preapproved items with established process for modifications or exceptions

Sometimes access can be complex especially for individuals eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States may offer HCBS through a number of statutory authorities as well as some time-limited grant programs

Increased demand from individuals and families the Olmstead decision other litigation and DOJ enforcement has spurred significant growth in HCBS over the past decade

The two primary HCBS sources for AT include 1915(c) HCBS waivers and 1915(i) HCBS as a State Plan Option

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act originally enacted in 1981 (with some amendments since then) remains the predominant vehicle for the delivery of HCBS More than 300 waivers serving more than 1

million people In federal fiscal year (FFY) 2011 total state and

federal expenditures for Section1915(c) waiver programs totaled nearly $38 billion1

1 CMS Truven Health Analytics Medicaid Expenditures For Section 1915(c) Waiver Programs In FFY 2011 Steve Eiken Brian Burwell Lisa Gold Kate Sredl Paul Saucier October 2013

8

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Title XIX permits the Secretary of Health amp Human Servicesto waive certain provisions required through the regular State Plan process For 1915(c) HCBS waivers the provisions that can

be waived are related to Comparability (amount duration and scope) ndash

provides ability to target benefit Statewideness Income and resource requirements

9

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Permits States to provide HCBS to people who would otherwise require Nursing Facility (NF) Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded (ICFsMR) or hospital Level of Care (LOC)

Serves diverse target groups ndash including individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities individuals with physical disabilities individual who are aging and those with mental health support needs

Services can be provided on a less than Statewide basis

Allows for participant-direction of services

10

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Costs HCBS must be ldquocost neutralrdquo as compared to institutional services on average for the individuals enrolled in the waiver

LOC Institutional levels of care define waiver LOC and the populations that may be targeted

Choice HCBS participants must have the choice of all willing and qualified providers

11

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Home Health Aide Personal Care Case Management Adult Day Health Habilitation Homemaker Respite CareFor chronic mental illness Day TreatmentPartial Hospitalization Psychosocial Rehabilitation Clinic Services AND Other Services ndash can be State-

proposed service specifications

12

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

AT is commonly covered in 1915(c) waivers States cover a wide array of technology

including commercially available technology when it is addressing an identified need in an individualrsquos plan of care

States frequently include annual multi-year andor lifetime dollar limits on AT

Prior authorization is also common for technology costing over certain amounts

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS offers the following Core Service Definition for Assistive Technology but states may amendchange as needed

Assistive technology device means an item piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially modified or customized that is used to increase maintain or improve functional capabilities of participants Assistive technology service means a service that directly assists a participant in the selection acquisition or use of an assistive technology device Assistive technology includes-- (A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of a participant including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology and appropriate services to the participant in the customary environment of the participant (B) services consisting of purchasing leasing or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices for participants (C) services consisting of selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing assistive technology devices (D) coordination and use of necessary therapies interventions or services with assistive technology devices such as therapies interventions or services associated with other services in the service plan (E) training or technical assistance for the participant or where appropriate the family members guardians advocates or authorized representatives of the participant and (F) training or technical assistance for professionals or other individuals who provide services to employ or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of participants

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 4: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Established in 1965 as a companion program to Medicare

ldquoGrants to States for Medical Assistance Programsrdquo ndash Medicaid

FederalState entitlement partnership program

Medicaid mandates some eligibility groups and services States may elect to include other groups and benefits

4

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Medicaid State Plan has historically referred to the list of services (both mandatory and optional) identified in Section 1905(a) of the statute

With additions to the SSA a statersquos Medicaid State Plan can include more services and benefits than those in 1905(a)

There are now HCBS state plan benefits described more fully below at 1915(i) and 1915(k) of the SSA

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Under the traditional Medicaid State Plan states often cover some AT through Home Health Services andor Durable Medical Equipment

Coverage and payment for items varies by state Medically-necessary DME for use in the home or to

function in the community States may have a list of preapproved items with established process for modifications or exceptions

Sometimes access can be complex especially for individuals eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States may offer HCBS through a number of statutory authorities as well as some time-limited grant programs

Increased demand from individuals and families the Olmstead decision other litigation and DOJ enforcement has spurred significant growth in HCBS over the past decade

The two primary HCBS sources for AT include 1915(c) HCBS waivers and 1915(i) HCBS as a State Plan Option

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act originally enacted in 1981 (with some amendments since then) remains the predominant vehicle for the delivery of HCBS More than 300 waivers serving more than 1

million people In federal fiscal year (FFY) 2011 total state and

federal expenditures for Section1915(c) waiver programs totaled nearly $38 billion1

1 CMS Truven Health Analytics Medicaid Expenditures For Section 1915(c) Waiver Programs In FFY 2011 Steve Eiken Brian Burwell Lisa Gold Kate Sredl Paul Saucier October 2013

8

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Title XIX permits the Secretary of Health amp Human Servicesto waive certain provisions required through the regular State Plan process For 1915(c) HCBS waivers the provisions that can

be waived are related to Comparability (amount duration and scope) ndash

provides ability to target benefit Statewideness Income and resource requirements

9

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Permits States to provide HCBS to people who would otherwise require Nursing Facility (NF) Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded (ICFsMR) or hospital Level of Care (LOC)

Serves diverse target groups ndash including individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities individuals with physical disabilities individual who are aging and those with mental health support needs

Services can be provided on a less than Statewide basis

Allows for participant-direction of services

10

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Costs HCBS must be ldquocost neutralrdquo as compared to institutional services on average for the individuals enrolled in the waiver

LOC Institutional levels of care define waiver LOC and the populations that may be targeted

Choice HCBS participants must have the choice of all willing and qualified providers

11

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Home Health Aide Personal Care Case Management Adult Day Health Habilitation Homemaker Respite CareFor chronic mental illness Day TreatmentPartial Hospitalization Psychosocial Rehabilitation Clinic Services AND Other Services ndash can be State-

proposed service specifications

12

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

AT is commonly covered in 1915(c) waivers States cover a wide array of technology

including commercially available technology when it is addressing an identified need in an individualrsquos plan of care

States frequently include annual multi-year andor lifetime dollar limits on AT

Prior authorization is also common for technology costing over certain amounts

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS offers the following Core Service Definition for Assistive Technology but states may amendchange as needed

Assistive technology device means an item piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially modified or customized that is used to increase maintain or improve functional capabilities of participants Assistive technology service means a service that directly assists a participant in the selection acquisition or use of an assistive technology device Assistive technology includes-- (A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of a participant including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology and appropriate services to the participant in the customary environment of the participant (B) services consisting of purchasing leasing or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices for participants (C) services consisting of selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing assistive technology devices (D) coordination and use of necessary therapies interventions or services with assistive technology devices such as therapies interventions or services associated with other services in the service plan (E) training or technical assistance for the participant or where appropriate the family members guardians advocates or authorized representatives of the participant and (F) training or technical assistance for professionals or other individuals who provide services to employ or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of participants

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 5: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Medicaid State Plan has historically referred to the list of services (both mandatory and optional) identified in Section 1905(a) of the statute

With additions to the SSA a statersquos Medicaid State Plan can include more services and benefits than those in 1905(a)

There are now HCBS state plan benefits described more fully below at 1915(i) and 1915(k) of the SSA

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Under the traditional Medicaid State Plan states often cover some AT through Home Health Services andor Durable Medical Equipment

Coverage and payment for items varies by state Medically-necessary DME for use in the home or to

function in the community States may have a list of preapproved items with established process for modifications or exceptions

Sometimes access can be complex especially for individuals eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States may offer HCBS through a number of statutory authorities as well as some time-limited grant programs

Increased demand from individuals and families the Olmstead decision other litigation and DOJ enforcement has spurred significant growth in HCBS over the past decade

The two primary HCBS sources for AT include 1915(c) HCBS waivers and 1915(i) HCBS as a State Plan Option

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act originally enacted in 1981 (with some amendments since then) remains the predominant vehicle for the delivery of HCBS More than 300 waivers serving more than 1

million people In federal fiscal year (FFY) 2011 total state and

federal expenditures for Section1915(c) waiver programs totaled nearly $38 billion1

1 CMS Truven Health Analytics Medicaid Expenditures For Section 1915(c) Waiver Programs In FFY 2011 Steve Eiken Brian Burwell Lisa Gold Kate Sredl Paul Saucier October 2013

8

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Title XIX permits the Secretary of Health amp Human Servicesto waive certain provisions required through the regular State Plan process For 1915(c) HCBS waivers the provisions that can

be waived are related to Comparability (amount duration and scope) ndash

provides ability to target benefit Statewideness Income and resource requirements

9

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Permits States to provide HCBS to people who would otherwise require Nursing Facility (NF) Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded (ICFsMR) or hospital Level of Care (LOC)

Serves diverse target groups ndash including individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities individuals with physical disabilities individual who are aging and those with mental health support needs

Services can be provided on a less than Statewide basis

Allows for participant-direction of services

10

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Costs HCBS must be ldquocost neutralrdquo as compared to institutional services on average for the individuals enrolled in the waiver

LOC Institutional levels of care define waiver LOC and the populations that may be targeted

Choice HCBS participants must have the choice of all willing and qualified providers

11

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Home Health Aide Personal Care Case Management Adult Day Health Habilitation Homemaker Respite CareFor chronic mental illness Day TreatmentPartial Hospitalization Psychosocial Rehabilitation Clinic Services AND Other Services ndash can be State-

proposed service specifications

12

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

AT is commonly covered in 1915(c) waivers States cover a wide array of technology

including commercially available technology when it is addressing an identified need in an individualrsquos plan of care

States frequently include annual multi-year andor lifetime dollar limits on AT

Prior authorization is also common for technology costing over certain amounts

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS offers the following Core Service Definition for Assistive Technology but states may amendchange as needed

Assistive technology device means an item piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially modified or customized that is used to increase maintain or improve functional capabilities of participants Assistive technology service means a service that directly assists a participant in the selection acquisition or use of an assistive technology device Assistive technology includes-- (A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of a participant including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology and appropriate services to the participant in the customary environment of the participant (B) services consisting of purchasing leasing or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices for participants (C) services consisting of selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing assistive technology devices (D) coordination and use of necessary therapies interventions or services with assistive technology devices such as therapies interventions or services associated with other services in the service plan (E) training or technical assistance for the participant or where appropriate the family members guardians advocates or authorized representatives of the participant and (F) training or technical assistance for professionals or other individuals who provide services to employ or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of participants

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 6: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Under the traditional Medicaid State Plan states often cover some AT through Home Health Services andor Durable Medical Equipment

Coverage and payment for items varies by state Medically-necessary DME for use in the home or to

function in the community States may have a list of preapproved items with established process for modifications or exceptions

Sometimes access can be complex especially for individuals eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States may offer HCBS through a number of statutory authorities as well as some time-limited grant programs

Increased demand from individuals and families the Olmstead decision other litigation and DOJ enforcement has spurred significant growth in HCBS over the past decade

The two primary HCBS sources for AT include 1915(c) HCBS waivers and 1915(i) HCBS as a State Plan Option

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act originally enacted in 1981 (with some amendments since then) remains the predominant vehicle for the delivery of HCBS More than 300 waivers serving more than 1

million people In federal fiscal year (FFY) 2011 total state and

federal expenditures for Section1915(c) waiver programs totaled nearly $38 billion1

1 CMS Truven Health Analytics Medicaid Expenditures For Section 1915(c) Waiver Programs In FFY 2011 Steve Eiken Brian Burwell Lisa Gold Kate Sredl Paul Saucier October 2013

8

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Title XIX permits the Secretary of Health amp Human Servicesto waive certain provisions required through the regular State Plan process For 1915(c) HCBS waivers the provisions that can

be waived are related to Comparability (amount duration and scope) ndash

provides ability to target benefit Statewideness Income and resource requirements

9

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Permits States to provide HCBS to people who would otherwise require Nursing Facility (NF) Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded (ICFsMR) or hospital Level of Care (LOC)

Serves diverse target groups ndash including individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities individuals with physical disabilities individual who are aging and those with mental health support needs

Services can be provided on a less than Statewide basis

Allows for participant-direction of services

10

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Costs HCBS must be ldquocost neutralrdquo as compared to institutional services on average for the individuals enrolled in the waiver

LOC Institutional levels of care define waiver LOC and the populations that may be targeted

Choice HCBS participants must have the choice of all willing and qualified providers

11

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Home Health Aide Personal Care Case Management Adult Day Health Habilitation Homemaker Respite CareFor chronic mental illness Day TreatmentPartial Hospitalization Psychosocial Rehabilitation Clinic Services AND Other Services ndash can be State-

proposed service specifications

12

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

AT is commonly covered in 1915(c) waivers States cover a wide array of technology

including commercially available technology when it is addressing an identified need in an individualrsquos plan of care

States frequently include annual multi-year andor lifetime dollar limits on AT

Prior authorization is also common for technology costing over certain amounts

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS offers the following Core Service Definition for Assistive Technology but states may amendchange as needed

Assistive technology device means an item piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially modified or customized that is used to increase maintain or improve functional capabilities of participants Assistive technology service means a service that directly assists a participant in the selection acquisition or use of an assistive technology device Assistive technology includes-- (A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of a participant including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology and appropriate services to the participant in the customary environment of the participant (B) services consisting of purchasing leasing or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices for participants (C) services consisting of selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing assistive technology devices (D) coordination and use of necessary therapies interventions or services with assistive technology devices such as therapies interventions or services associated with other services in the service plan (E) training or technical assistance for the participant or where appropriate the family members guardians advocates or authorized representatives of the participant and (F) training or technical assistance for professionals or other individuals who provide services to employ or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of participants

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 7: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

States may offer HCBS through a number of statutory authorities as well as some time-limited grant programs

Increased demand from individuals and families the Olmstead decision other litigation and DOJ enforcement has spurred significant growth in HCBS over the past decade

The two primary HCBS sources for AT include 1915(c) HCBS waivers and 1915(i) HCBS as a State Plan Option

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act originally enacted in 1981 (with some amendments since then) remains the predominant vehicle for the delivery of HCBS More than 300 waivers serving more than 1

million people In federal fiscal year (FFY) 2011 total state and

federal expenditures for Section1915(c) waiver programs totaled nearly $38 billion1

1 CMS Truven Health Analytics Medicaid Expenditures For Section 1915(c) Waiver Programs In FFY 2011 Steve Eiken Brian Burwell Lisa Gold Kate Sredl Paul Saucier October 2013

8

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Title XIX permits the Secretary of Health amp Human Servicesto waive certain provisions required through the regular State Plan process For 1915(c) HCBS waivers the provisions that can

be waived are related to Comparability (amount duration and scope) ndash

provides ability to target benefit Statewideness Income and resource requirements

9

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Permits States to provide HCBS to people who would otherwise require Nursing Facility (NF) Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded (ICFsMR) or hospital Level of Care (LOC)

Serves diverse target groups ndash including individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities individuals with physical disabilities individual who are aging and those with mental health support needs

Services can be provided on a less than Statewide basis

Allows for participant-direction of services

10

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Costs HCBS must be ldquocost neutralrdquo as compared to institutional services on average for the individuals enrolled in the waiver

LOC Institutional levels of care define waiver LOC and the populations that may be targeted

Choice HCBS participants must have the choice of all willing and qualified providers

11

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Home Health Aide Personal Care Case Management Adult Day Health Habilitation Homemaker Respite CareFor chronic mental illness Day TreatmentPartial Hospitalization Psychosocial Rehabilitation Clinic Services AND Other Services ndash can be State-

proposed service specifications

12

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

AT is commonly covered in 1915(c) waivers States cover a wide array of technology

including commercially available technology when it is addressing an identified need in an individualrsquos plan of care

States frequently include annual multi-year andor lifetime dollar limits on AT

Prior authorization is also common for technology costing over certain amounts

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS offers the following Core Service Definition for Assistive Technology but states may amendchange as needed

Assistive technology device means an item piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially modified or customized that is used to increase maintain or improve functional capabilities of participants Assistive technology service means a service that directly assists a participant in the selection acquisition or use of an assistive technology device Assistive technology includes-- (A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of a participant including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology and appropriate services to the participant in the customary environment of the participant (B) services consisting of purchasing leasing or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices for participants (C) services consisting of selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing assistive technology devices (D) coordination and use of necessary therapies interventions or services with assistive technology devices such as therapies interventions or services associated with other services in the service plan (E) training or technical assistance for the participant or where appropriate the family members guardians advocates or authorized representatives of the participant and (F) training or technical assistance for professionals or other individuals who provide services to employ or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of participants

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 8: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act originally enacted in 1981 (with some amendments since then) remains the predominant vehicle for the delivery of HCBS More than 300 waivers serving more than 1

million people In federal fiscal year (FFY) 2011 total state and

federal expenditures for Section1915(c) waiver programs totaled nearly $38 billion1

1 CMS Truven Health Analytics Medicaid Expenditures For Section 1915(c) Waiver Programs In FFY 2011 Steve Eiken Brian Burwell Lisa Gold Kate Sredl Paul Saucier October 2013

8

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Title XIX permits the Secretary of Health amp Human Servicesto waive certain provisions required through the regular State Plan process For 1915(c) HCBS waivers the provisions that can

be waived are related to Comparability (amount duration and scope) ndash

provides ability to target benefit Statewideness Income and resource requirements

9

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Permits States to provide HCBS to people who would otherwise require Nursing Facility (NF) Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded (ICFsMR) or hospital Level of Care (LOC)

Serves diverse target groups ndash including individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities individuals with physical disabilities individual who are aging and those with mental health support needs

Services can be provided on a less than Statewide basis

Allows for participant-direction of services

10

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Costs HCBS must be ldquocost neutralrdquo as compared to institutional services on average for the individuals enrolled in the waiver

LOC Institutional levels of care define waiver LOC and the populations that may be targeted

Choice HCBS participants must have the choice of all willing and qualified providers

11

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Home Health Aide Personal Care Case Management Adult Day Health Habilitation Homemaker Respite CareFor chronic mental illness Day TreatmentPartial Hospitalization Psychosocial Rehabilitation Clinic Services AND Other Services ndash can be State-

proposed service specifications

12

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

AT is commonly covered in 1915(c) waivers States cover a wide array of technology

including commercially available technology when it is addressing an identified need in an individualrsquos plan of care

States frequently include annual multi-year andor lifetime dollar limits on AT

Prior authorization is also common for technology costing over certain amounts

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS offers the following Core Service Definition for Assistive Technology but states may amendchange as needed

Assistive technology device means an item piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially modified or customized that is used to increase maintain or improve functional capabilities of participants Assistive technology service means a service that directly assists a participant in the selection acquisition or use of an assistive technology device Assistive technology includes-- (A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of a participant including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology and appropriate services to the participant in the customary environment of the participant (B) services consisting of purchasing leasing or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices for participants (C) services consisting of selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing assistive technology devices (D) coordination and use of necessary therapies interventions or services with assistive technology devices such as therapies interventions or services associated with other services in the service plan (E) training or technical assistance for the participant or where appropriate the family members guardians advocates or authorized representatives of the participant and (F) training or technical assistance for professionals or other individuals who provide services to employ or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of participants

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 9: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Title XIX permits the Secretary of Health amp Human Servicesto waive certain provisions required through the regular State Plan process For 1915(c) HCBS waivers the provisions that can

be waived are related to Comparability (amount duration and scope) ndash

provides ability to target benefit Statewideness Income and resource requirements

9

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Permits States to provide HCBS to people who would otherwise require Nursing Facility (NF) Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded (ICFsMR) or hospital Level of Care (LOC)

Serves diverse target groups ndash including individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities individuals with physical disabilities individual who are aging and those with mental health support needs

Services can be provided on a less than Statewide basis

Allows for participant-direction of services

10

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Costs HCBS must be ldquocost neutralrdquo as compared to institutional services on average for the individuals enrolled in the waiver

LOC Institutional levels of care define waiver LOC and the populations that may be targeted

Choice HCBS participants must have the choice of all willing and qualified providers

11

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Home Health Aide Personal Care Case Management Adult Day Health Habilitation Homemaker Respite CareFor chronic mental illness Day TreatmentPartial Hospitalization Psychosocial Rehabilitation Clinic Services AND Other Services ndash can be State-

proposed service specifications

12

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

AT is commonly covered in 1915(c) waivers States cover a wide array of technology

including commercially available technology when it is addressing an identified need in an individualrsquos plan of care

States frequently include annual multi-year andor lifetime dollar limits on AT

Prior authorization is also common for technology costing over certain amounts

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS offers the following Core Service Definition for Assistive Technology but states may amendchange as needed

Assistive technology device means an item piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially modified or customized that is used to increase maintain or improve functional capabilities of participants Assistive technology service means a service that directly assists a participant in the selection acquisition or use of an assistive technology device Assistive technology includes-- (A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of a participant including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology and appropriate services to the participant in the customary environment of the participant (B) services consisting of purchasing leasing or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices for participants (C) services consisting of selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing assistive technology devices (D) coordination and use of necessary therapies interventions or services with assistive technology devices such as therapies interventions or services associated with other services in the service plan (E) training or technical assistance for the participant or where appropriate the family members guardians advocates or authorized representatives of the participant and (F) training or technical assistance for professionals or other individuals who provide services to employ or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of participants

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 10: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Permits States to provide HCBS to people who would otherwise require Nursing Facility (NF) Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded (ICFsMR) or hospital Level of Care (LOC)

Serves diverse target groups ndash including individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities individuals with physical disabilities individual who are aging and those with mental health support needs

Services can be provided on a less than Statewide basis

Allows for participant-direction of services

10

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Costs HCBS must be ldquocost neutralrdquo as compared to institutional services on average for the individuals enrolled in the waiver

LOC Institutional levels of care define waiver LOC and the populations that may be targeted

Choice HCBS participants must have the choice of all willing and qualified providers

11

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Home Health Aide Personal Care Case Management Adult Day Health Habilitation Homemaker Respite CareFor chronic mental illness Day TreatmentPartial Hospitalization Psychosocial Rehabilitation Clinic Services AND Other Services ndash can be State-

proposed service specifications

12

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

AT is commonly covered in 1915(c) waivers States cover a wide array of technology

including commercially available technology when it is addressing an identified need in an individualrsquos plan of care

States frequently include annual multi-year andor lifetime dollar limits on AT

Prior authorization is also common for technology costing over certain amounts

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS offers the following Core Service Definition for Assistive Technology but states may amendchange as needed

Assistive technology device means an item piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially modified or customized that is used to increase maintain or improve functional capabilities of participants Assistive technology service means a service that directly assists a participant in the selection acquisition or use of an assistive technology device Assistive technology includes-- (A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of a participant including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology and appropriate services to the participant in the customary environment of the participant (B) services consisting of purchasing leasing or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices for participants (C) services consisting of selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing assistive technology devices (D) coordination and use of necessary therapies interventions or services with assistive technology devices such as therapies interventions or services associated with other services in the service plan (E) training or technical assistance for the participant or where appropriate the family members guardians advocates or authorized representatives of the participant and (F) training or technical assistance for professionals or other individuals who provide services to employ or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of participants

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 11: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Costs HCBS must be ldquocost neutralrdquo as compared to institutional services on average for the individuals enrolled in the waiver

LOC Institutional levels of care define waiver LOC and the populations that may be targeted

Choice HCBS participants must have the choice of all willing and qualified providers

11

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Home Health Aide Personal Care Case Management Adult Day Health Habilitation Homemaker Respite CareFor chronic mental illness Day TreatmentPartial Hospitalization Psychosocial Rehabilitation Clinic Services AND Other Services ndash can be State-

proposed service specifications

12

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

AT is commonly covered in 1915(c) waivers States cover a wide array of technology

including commercially available technology when it is addressing an identified need in an individualrsquos plan of care

States frequently include annual multi-year andor lifetime dollar limits on AT

Prior authorization is also common for technology costing over certain amounts

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS offers the following Core Service Definition for Assistive Technology but states may amendchange as needed

Assistive technology device means an item piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially modified or customized that is used to increase maintain or improve functional capabilities of participants Assistive technology service means a service that directly assists a participant in the selection acquisition or use of an assistive technology device Assistive technology includes-- (A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of a participant including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology and appropriate services to the participant in the customary environment of the participant (B) services consisting of purchasing leasing or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices for participants (C) services consisting of selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing assistive technology devices (D) coordination and use of necessary therapies interventions or services with assistive technology devices such as therapies interventions or services associated with other services in the service plan (E) training or technical assistance for the participant or where appropriate the family members guardians advocates or authorized representatives of the participant and (F) training or technical assistance for professionals or other individuals who provide services to employ or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of participants

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 12: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Home Health Aide Personal Care Case Management Adult Day Health Habilitation Homemaker Respite CareFor chronic mental illness Day TreatmentPartial Hospitalization Psychosocial Rehabilitation Clinic Services AND Other Services ndash can be State-

proposed service specifications

12

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

AT is commonly covered in 1915(c) waivers States cover a wide array of technology

including commercially available technology when it is addressing an identified need in an individualrsquos plan of care

States frequently include annual multi-year andor lifetime dollar limits on AT

Prior authorization is also common for technology costing over certain amounts

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS offers the following Core Service Definition for Assistive Technology but states may amendchange as needed

Assistive technology device means an item piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially modified or customized that is used to increase maintain or improve functional capabilities of participants Assistive technology service means a service that directly assists a participant in the selection acquisition or use of an assistive technology device Assistive technology includes-- (A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of a participant including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology and appropriate services to the participant in the customary environment of the participant (B) services consisting of purchasing leasing or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices for participants (C) services consisting of selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing assistive technology devices (D) coordination and use of necessary therapies interventions or services with assistive technology devices such as therapies interventions or services associated with other services in the service plan (E) training or technical assistance for the participant or where appropriate the family members guardians advocates or authorized representatives of the participant and (F) training or technical assistance for professionals or other individuals who provide services to employ or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of participants

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 13: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

AT is commonly covered in 1915(c) waivers States cover a wide array of technology

including commercially available technology when it is addressing an identified need in an individualrsquos plan of care

States frequently include annual multi-year andor lifetime dollar limits on AT

Prior authorization is also common for technology costing over certain amounts

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS offers the following Core Service Definition for Assistive Technology but states may amendchange as needed

Assistive technology device means an item piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially modified or customized that is used to increase maintain or improve functional capabilities of participants Assistive technology service means a service that directly assists a participant in the selection acquisition or use of an assistive technology device Assistive technology includes-- (A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of a participant including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology and appropriate services to the participant in the customary environment of the participant (B) services consisting of purchasing leasing or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices for participants (C) services consisting of selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing assistive technology devices (D) coordination and use of necessary therapies interventions or services with assistive technology devices such as therapies interventions or services associated with other services in the service plan (E) training or technical assistance for the participant or where appropriate the family members guardians advocates or authorized representatives of the participant and (F) training or technical assistance for professionals or other individuals who provide services to employ or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of participants

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 14: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

CMS offers the following Core Service Definition for Assistive Technology but states may amendchange as needed

Assistive technology device means an item piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially modified or customized that is used to increase maintain or improve functional capabilities of participants Assistive technology service means a service that directly assists a participant in the selection acquisition or use of an assistive technology device Assistive technology includes-- (A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of a participant including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology and appropriate services to the participant in the customary environment of the participant (B) services consisting of purchasing leasing or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices for participants (C) services consisting of selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing assistive technology devices (D) coordination and use of necessary therapies interventions or services with assistive technology devices such as therapies interventions or services associated with other services in the service plan (E) training or technical assistance for the participant or where appropriate the family members guardians advocates or authorized representatives of the participant and (F) training or technical assistance for professionals or other individuals who provide services to employ or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of participants

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 15: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

CMS ReviewApproval Process CMS approves a new waiver for a period of 3

years (possible 5 years for programs serving MedicareMedicaid eligible individuals)

States may request amendments at any time States may request that waivers be renewed CMS

considers whether the State has met statutoryregulatory assurances in determining whether to renew

Renewals are granted for a period of 5 yearsEach of these opportunities for change or

renewal offers an opportunity to add or improve AT coverage

15

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 16: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Originally authorized under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (effective 2007) 1915(i) permits states to offer HCBS as a state plan option

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 amended 1915(i) providing states opportunity to target benefit and to offer services entirely consistent with those available under 1915(c)

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 17: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

May target services to specific groups (waives comparability)

Evaluation to determine program eligibility

Assessment of need for services

Plan of care

Health and Welfare and Quality Requirements

Self Direction Same allowable services Both use a preprinted application format

17

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 18: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Financial Eligibility Criteria

Program Eligibility

Institutional care requirements

Length of time for operation

Financial estimates

Waiver of statewideness

18

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 19: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

1915(c)

Must have eligibility criteria at least as stringent as the institutions

LOC must beequal to or greater than institution but not less than institution

1915(i)

Needs based not tied to institutional criteria

But institutional criteria must be more stringent than 1915(i) needs-based criteria therefore

Needs-based eligibility criteria must be

less than institution

19

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 20: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

1915(c) Can cap the numbers

served May have a waiting

list Can cap individual

expenditures

1915(i) Cannot cap the

numbers served or individual expenditure

All eligibles are entitled to the program

May NOT have a waiting list

Eligibility assessment must be independent

20

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 21: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

1915(c)

3 years initial 5 years upon

renewal

1915(i)

If state targets 5 years until renewal

Indefinite if state does not target

21

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 22: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

1915(c)

Reasonable estimates of cost and utilization

Program must be cost neutral compared to institutional care

1915(i)

Reveal payment methodology on Attachment 419-B of the State Plan

22

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 23: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

1915(i) permits all statutory and ldquootherrdquo 1915(c) services

Under 1915(i) and (c) states can ldquotargetrdquo services to specific populations Example autism services recovery services

May have multiple iSPAs or HCBS waivers Same prohibitions on covering services

that otherwise would be covered through IDEA or the Rehabilitation Act

23

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 24: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

1915(c)

May waive statewideness

1915(i)

May not waive statewideness

24

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 25: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

As of June 2014 14 states have approved 1915(i) SPAs California Colorado Connecticut Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Montana Nevada Oregon Wisconsin

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 26: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Many states are considering moving HCBS and other LTSS into a managed care environment

Assistive technology may be included in services covered by managed care entities

States may also allow managed care entities to provide cost effective alternatives to covered services ndash Assistive technology may play a key role in those alternatives

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 27: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

States may have a set array of technology they will pay for in their standard fee-for-service arrangements

In some states self-direction through the management of an individual budget may afford even greater opportunity for individualized AT

Self-direction is an option in both 1915(c) and 1915(i) HCBS programs

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 28: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

To ensure that individuals receiving long-term services and supports through home and community based service (HCBS) programs under the 1915(c) 1915(i) and 1915(k) Medicaid authorities have full access to benefits of community living and the opportunity to receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate

To enhance the quality of HCBS and provide

protections to participants

28

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 29: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

States can now combine multiple target populations within one 1915(c) waiver

Gives CMS with new compliance options for 1915(c) waiver programs not just approvedeny

Establishes five-year renewal cycle to align concurrent authorities for certain demonstration projects or waivers for individuals who are dual eligible

Includes a provider payment reassignment provision to facilitate certain state initiatives (payment of health premiums or training costs for example)

29

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 30: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Conflict-free case management Was just in guidance now it is in rule

Implements the final rule for 1915(i) State plan HCBSmdashsame requirements on HCB settings character person-centered planning

Makes clear HCB settings characteristics also apply to 1915(k) Community First Choice option

Sets conditions and timelines for filing transition plans and coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

30

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 31: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

HCB Settings Character What is NOT community What is likely not community What is community

Person-centered planning Codifies requirements

Transition planning-coming into compliance with the HCB settings requirements

31NASDDDS 41714

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 32: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

42CFR441310(C)(4)Is integrated in and supports access to the greater community

Provides opportunities to seek employment and work in competitive integrated settings engage in community life and control personal resources

Ensures the individual receives services in the community to the same degree of access as individuals not receiving Medicaid home and community-based services

32

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 33: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

As states identify strategies to meet the obligations of the new regulations they may look to technology to assist individuals to more effectively engage in their community get and maintain employment develop social networks and communicate with friends family and co-workers

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 34: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Determining whether what and how your state covers AT can be daunting

Building relationships becoming informed and educating others are key to having a voice in future AT coverage strategies

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 35: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

A key message to policy-makershellipAT may be the necessary difference for individuals to live work and meaningfully engage in community

NASDDDSNational Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 36: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

A number of states such as Ohio and Indiana have made strides in expanding access to AT to increase community living and participation

To learn more about state activity and options wwwmedicaidgov Coleman Institute

httpwwwcolemaninstituteorg

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 37: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

wwwnasuadorg

2014 State of Aging and DisabilitiesAssistive Technology and Medicaid

July 14 2014

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 38: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

NASUAD Overview

bull Founded in 1964 to represent state agencies on aging

bull In 2010 changed name in recognition of the fact that most state agencies served aging and disability populations

bull 56 members Represents State and Territorial Agencies on Aging and Disabilities

bull Board of Directors ndash Executive Officers 10 regional representatives and 10 regional alternate reps

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 39: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Our mission

To design improve and sustain state systems delivering home and community based services and supports for

the elderly and individuals with disabilities and their caregivers

Page 39

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 40: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Key Resources

bull NASUADorgbull HCBSorgbull NASUADiQorgbull Friday Updatebull Integration Trackerbull Expansion Tracker

Page 40

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 41: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conferencebull September 15-18 2014 Crystal City VAbull 5 pre-conference intensivesbull 130 sessions covering all populations receiving LTSSbull 1000 attendees representing state policymakers

federal officials staff academics businesses etc

bull For more information wwwnasuadorg

Page 41

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 42: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

State Aging amp Disability Agencies

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 43: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 44: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Page 44

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 45: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Page 45

Managing relationships identified as key job responsibility

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 46: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

State Medicaid HCBS Options

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 47: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Page 47

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 48: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Page 48

Change in Waiver Caseload for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities Served by Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Compared to SFY 2012 in SFY 2013 the Waiver Caseload

Increased DecreasedStayed the

Same Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 258 00 161 581

Autism 138 00 138 724

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 333 00 167 500

Older Adults 629 00 143 229

Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 545 91 212 152

Adults with Physical Disabilities 567 00 200 233

Severe Emotional Disturbance 179 00 107 714

Traumatic Brain Injury 214 36 250 500

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 49: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Page 49

Percent Change in State Medicaid HCBS Waiver Expenditures for Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities

2012 - 2013 Percent Change in Waiver Expenditures

Less than 5 5-8 8-15 More than 15 Not Applicable

of States of States of States of States of States

Alzheimers Disease 125 00 00 00 875

Autism 80 00 40 00 880

IntellectualDevelopmental Disabilities 200 80 120 00 600

Older Adults 179 143 143 71 464

Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities 296 37 148 185 333

Adults with Physical Disabilities 125 83 42 83 667

Severe Emotional Disturbance 83 42 00 00 875

Traumatic Brain Injury 42 125 00 42 792

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 50: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

State Assistive Technology Coverage

Page 50

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 51: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies

bull Types of assistive technology funded by 20 surveyed state agencies on aging and disabilities ndash Seventeen states fund some type of personal

emergency response system (PERS) ndash Six states fund technology to support home andor

vehicle modifications ndash Three states (Colorado Iowa and Minnesota) use

telehealthtelemedicine ndash Three states (Colorado Maine and Minnesota) use

telemonitoring or wander locating ndash Two states (Minnesota and Texas) use remote

medication management automated medication dispensing

Page 51

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 52: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Page 52

State Services Available to Specified Populations through Medicaid HCBS Waivers

Older AdultsIndividuals with Physical

Disabilities Individuals with IDD Individuals with TBI

of States of States of States of States

Adult Day Health (includes health component) 28 23 14 12

Adult Day Social (does not include health component) 26 16 15 11

Adult Foster Care 14 15 12 5

Assisted Living 28 25 5 7

Assistive Technology 27 27 27 19

Behavioral Supports 10 12 26 12

Environmental Modifications 31 32 27 16

Home-Delivered Meals 31 23 10 8

Personal Assistance Services 32 32 27 17

Personal Emergency Response Systems 34 28 21 11

Physical Therapy 12 13 18 8

Recreation Therapy 2 3 4 0

Residential Habilitation 3 4 25 9

Respite 35 30 27 14

Specialized Equipment and Supplies 28 30 23 16

Speech Therapy 10 11 15 6

Supported Employment 4 6 28 10

Transportation 32 28 27 16

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Personal Care 9 9 6 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Nursing 8 10 8 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Home Health 7 7 4 4

Extended State Plan Waiver Benefit Other 4 3 6 3

N=40

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 53: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)

bull Remote Monitoring service is the monitoring of an adult member in his or her residence by staff using one or more of the following systems ndash live video feedndash live audio feedndash motion sensing systemndash radio frequency identificationndash web-based monitoring system or ndash other device approved by OKDHSDDSD

bull The system shall include devices to engage in live two-way communication with the member being monitored as described in the memberrsquos Plan

Page 53

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 54: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)bull Assistive devices for members who are deaf or hard of hearing

ndash visual alarms

ndash telecommunication devices (TDDs) telephone amplifying devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Assistive devices for members who are blind or visually impaired

ndash tape recorders

ndash talking calculators

ndash lamps magnifiers

ndash Braille writers paper and talking computerized devices and

ndash other devices for protection of health and safety

bull Augmentativealternative communication and learning aids such as language boards electronic communication devices and competence based cause and effect systems

bull Mobility positioning devices such as wheelchairs travel chairs walkers positioning systems ramps seating systems lifts bathing equipment specialized beds and specialized chairs

bull Orthotic and prosthetic devices such as braces and prescribed modified shoes

bull Environmental controls such as devices to operate appliances use telephones or open doors

Page 54

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 55: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)

bull TeleCare integrates social and healthcare services supported by innovative technologies to sustain and promote independence quality of life and reduce the need for nursing home placement By utilizing in-home technology more options are available to assist and support individuals so that they can remain in their own homes and reduce the need for re-hospitalization TeleCare services are specified by the service plan as necessary to enable the participant to promote independence and to ensure the health welfare and safety of the participant and are provided pursuant to consumer choice

bull TeleCare includes ndash 1) Health Status Measuring and Monitoring TeleCare

Servicendash 2) Activity and Sensor Monitoring TeleCare Service and ndash 3) Medication Dispensing and Monitoring TeleCare

Services

Page 55

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 56: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)

bull Assistive Technology Supports are specialized equipment and supplies that enable a client to increase maintain or improve hisher functional capabilities It includes the evaluation and purchasing (not leasing) of the assistive technology It includes selecting designing fitting customizing adapting applying maintaining repairing or replacing the assistive technology device and any training or technical assistance for the client and family members guardians etc

Page 56

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 57: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)

bull Supplies Equipment and Assistive Technology means medical supplies and equipment and specialized appliances devices or controls necessary for the personal care of a HASCI Waiver participant or to increase his or her ability to perform activities of daily living or interact with others It includes items needed for life support and ancillary supplies and equipment necessary for the proper functioning of such items Excluded are items not of direct medical or remedial benefit to the participant

Page 57

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 58: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Medicaid and Managed LTSS

Page 58

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 59: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Medicaid Managed Care bull Managed Care in Medicaid can mean different things

includingndash Comprehensive contracts with health plansndash Contracts with limited benefit plans such as

bull Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (PIHPs)bull Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plans (PAHPs)

ndash Primary Care Case Management and other ldquomanaged fee-for-servicerdquo

ndash Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Plans and

ndash Others

Page 59

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 60: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows

bull Historically Medicaid Managed Care was largely limited to Children Parents Pregnant Women and other ldquoless complexrdquo populations

bull States began including primary and acute care for some seniors and individuals with disabilities which could include DME and other medically-oriented AT

bull A growing number of States are expanding managed care to encompass comprehensive benefits including LTSS

Page 60

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 61: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)

bull 41 percent of enrollees age 65+ were in some form of managed care

bull 87 percent of non-disabled children were in managed care

bull Comprehensive MCO enrollmentndash 14 of aged beneficiariesndash 33 of individuals with disabilitiesndash 48 of adults without disabilities andndash 63 of children without disabilities

Page 61

Source MACPAC June 2014

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 62: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 63: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 64: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 65: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 66: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Page 66

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 67: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Page 67

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 68: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities

bull MCOs are frequently given latitude tondash Establish selective provider networksndash Negotiate rates and contractual requirements with providers

and suppliersndash Develop prior authorization and utilization controls

bull Medicaid MCOs are given strong incentives to provide care in a cost-effective manner creating a value-proposition dynamicndash AT providers can benefit when they demonstrate value by

reducing other costs such as hospitalization post-acute and nursing homes

ndash However this dynamic can be challenging for providers that are used to being paid directly by the State at predetermined rates and in many cases without performance standards

Page 68

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 69: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

State AT Involvement and

MedicaidMarty Exline

Missouri Assistive TechnologyJuly 14 2014

Missouri Assistive Technology

Blue Springs Missouri 64015

816-655-6700

Martyexlineattnet

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 70: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Challenges amp Opportunities

What AT is covered in my statersquos HCBS waivers

bullStatersquos Waiver applications

bullState annual 372 report to CMS

bullContact your state waiver manager

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 71: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in HCB WAIVERS

CMS Technical Assistance Guide 35

bull Home Accessibility Adaptations

bull Environmental Accessibility Adaptations

bull Vehicle Modifications

bull Specialized Medical Equipment amp Supplies

bull Personal Emergency Response Systems

bull Assistive Technology

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 72: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

Source FY12 372 Reports

Comprehensive Support Autism MOCDD Partnership Total

Total Waiver Expenditures $512677539 $15588016 $1513136 $2421925 $5840897 $538041513

Total Unduplicated Participants 8126 1406 160 207 1314 11213

Total EAA Costs $238037 $85277 $0 $79516 $90612 $493442

Unduplicated Participants Receiving EAA 69 22 0 23 20 134

DD Waiver-Environmental Accessibility Adaptations (EAA)

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 73: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

OKLAHOMA Able TECH

Living Choice Advisory Committee

AT in my Life My Choice Waiver Policy to increase or maintain functional abilities

State plan coverage of iPads for communication

Provider for OK Medicaid

DME Re-use

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 74: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

VERMONT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

bull Piloting an MFP ldquoAT and Access Evaluationrdquo

bull 3 ndashStep Process

bull VATP reviews Eval Reportdevice loans for trialsreuse project

bull DD Technology Workgroup

bull State plan coverage for iOS devices for communication

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 75: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

MISSOURI ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

bull AT in all DD HCB waivers

bull Developed guidelines for coverage

bull Provider of AT for DD waivers

bull Training

bull Money Follows the Person

bull Stakeholder Group

bull Training for MFP Contact Agencies

bull MFP training for nursing facilities

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 76: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM of COLORADO

bull In regular meetings with Medicaid to reconfigure all HCBS waivers

bull Has hosted meetings at their facility

bull AT Advisory Committee Co-chair serves on MFP advisory board

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 77: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

NEBRASKA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP

bull Provider for NE Aged amp Disabled Waiver

bull Collaborated to develop referral process guidelines regulations forms etc

bull Provides assessments for home modifications and AT

bull $5000 cap on service so provides funding coordination

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities
Page 78: Mary Sowers NASDDDS July 14, 2014 NASDDDS National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services 113 Oronoco Street, Alexandria,

State AT Considerations

bull Broad terminology

bull Watch exclusions

bull Evaluations amp training included

bull Waiver service cost maximums

bull State plan services

bull Help suggest language for guidelines

  • NASUAD Overview
  • Our mission
  • Key Resources
  • Join us at the 30th annual HCBS conference
  • State Aging amp Disability Agencies
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Slide 45
  • State Medicaid HCBS Options
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • State Assistive Technology Coverage
  • 2012 Survey of Assistive Technology and State Agencies
  • Slide 52
  • State Examples Oklahoma (IDDD)
  • Slide 54
  • State Examples Pennsylvania (Seniors)
  • State Example New York (Aged and Physical Disabilities)
  • State Example South Carolina (TBI or Spinal Cord Injuries)
  • Medicaid and Managed LTSS
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • Managed Care and MLTSS Growth Continues but Slows
  • Medicaid Managed Care Statistics (FY 2011)
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Slide 64
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Medicaid MCOs Bring Challenges and Opportunities