mcas report spring 2013
DESCRIPTION
MCAS REPORT Spring 2013. Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent. OVERVIEW OF MCAS TESTS. Grades 3-8 and 10 – ELA and Math Grades 4, 7 and 10 – Composition Grades 5 and 8 – Science and Technology - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
MCAS REPORTMCAS REPORTSpring 2013Spring 2013
Presented to the Hingham School Committee
November 18, 2013
by
Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent
OVERVIEW OF MCAS TESTSOVERVIEW OF MCAS TESTS
Grades 3-8 and 10 – ELA and Math Grades 4, 7 and 10 – Composition Grades 5 and 8 – Science and Technology Grades 9/10 – Science and Technology
(Biology and Chemistry)
Multiple Choice Open Response Short Answer Writing Prompts
MCAS DATAMCAS DATA
Percentage of Students at Proficient/ Percentage of Students at Proficient/ Advanced LevelsAdvanced Levels
Composite Performance Index – CPI Composite Performance Index – CPI (measure of progress toward 100% proficient/advanced goal)
Student Growth Percentile - SGP Student Growth Percentile - SGP (measure of progress in student performance over previous year compared to academic peers)
MCAS RESULTSMCAS RESULTSPercentage of Students at Proficient / Advanced LevelsPercentage of Students at Proficient / Advanced Levels
20132013
Grades 3, 4 and 5 Mass. Hingham
Grade 3 Reading 57 77
Grade 3 Math 66 80
Grade 4 ELA 53 81
Grade 4 Math 52 79
Grade 5 ELA 66 86
Grade 5 Math 61 81
Grade 5 Science 51 78
Grades 6, 7 and 8 Mass. Hingham
Grade 6 ELA 67 86
Grade 6 Math 61 83
Grade 7 ELA 72 96
Grade 7 Math 52 73
Grade 8 ELA 78 94
Grade 8 Math 55 82
Grade 8 Science 39 58
Grade 10 Mass. Hingham
Grade 10 ELA 91 100
Grade 10 Math 80 95
Grade 10 Science 71 94
All Grades Mass. Hingham
ELA 69 88
Math 61 81
Science 53 75
MCAS RESULTSMCAS RESULTSComposite Performance Index Results (CPI)Composite Performance Index Results (CPI)
20132013
Grades 3, 4 and 5 Mass. Hingham
Grade 3 Reading 83.3 92.6
Grade 3 Math 84.3 92.4
Grade 4 ELA 78.9 93.1
Grade 4 Math 80.2 92.6
Grade 5 ELA 84.7 94.2
Grade 5 Math 80.6 91.9
Grade 5 Science 78.5 91.6
Grades 6, 7 and 8 Mass. Hingham
Grade 6 ELA 85.1 94.8
Grade 6 Math 80.3 92.3
Grade 7 ELA 88.4 98.8
Grade 7 Math 74.4 89.1
Grade 8 ELA 90.1 97.8
Grade 8 Math 76.0 93.8
Grade 8 Science 71.0 84.7
Grade 10 Mass. Hingham
Grade 10 ELA 96.9 100
Grade 10 Math 90.2 98.1
Grade 10 Science 88.0 98.1
All Grades Mass. Hingham
ELA 86.8 95.6
Math 80.8 92.6
Science 79.0 91.0
MCAS RESULTSMCAS RESULTSStudent Growth Percentile (SGP)Student Growth Percentile (SGP)
(Massachusetts 2013 Median Scores – 50(Massachusetts 2013 Median Scores – 50thth Percentile) Percentile)
Grade 10 Hingham
ELA 68*
Math 56.5
Grades 4 and 5 Hingham
Grade 4 ELA 64*
Grade 4 Math 66*
Grade 5 ELA 67*
Grade 5 Math 64*
Grades 6, 7 and 8 Hingham
Grade 6 ELA 60*
Grade 6 Math 47
Grade 7 ELA 64*
Grade 7 Math 47
Grade 8 ELA 47
Grade 8 Math 56.5
All Grades Hingham
ELA 63*
Math 57
* High SGP 60 - 99 Typical SGP 40 - 59 Low SGP 0 - 39
DISTRICT STRENGTHSDISTRICT STRENGTHS
Scores higher than stateScores higher than state: percentage scoring proficient/advanced and CPIs
Highest scoresHighest scores: gr. 10 ELA, math and science; gr. 6, 7 and 8 ELA and gr. 6 math; gr. 5 ELA and math; gr. 4 ELA
Highest CPIsHighest CPIs: gr. 10 ELA, math and science; gr. 6, 7, and 8 ELA; gr. 5 ELA
Highest SGPsHighest SGPs: gr. 10 ELA; gr. 6 and 7 ELA; gr. 5 ELA and math; gr. 4 ELA and math
DISTRICT STRENGTHS DISTRICT STRENGTHS (continued)
Increases in percentage at proficient/ Increases in percentage at proficient/ advancedadvanced: gr. 10 ELA (100) and science; gr. 7 ELA; gr. 8 math; gr. 5 ELA; gr. 4 ELA and math
Special education CPIs higher than state CPIsSpecial education CPIs higher than state CPIs
Gender CPIs similarGender CPIs similar
Small range between elementary school Small range between elementary school scoresscores: gr. 3 reading; gr. 4 ELA and math
High district state rankingsHigh district state rankings: gr. 10 ELA and science; gr. 7 ELA; gr. 4 ELA and math
DISTRICT CONCERNSDISTRICT CONCERNS
Lowest scoreLowest score: gr. 8 science
Lowest SGPLowest SGP: gr. 6 and 7 math and gr. 8 ELA below state SGP
Lowest Special Education CPIsLowest Special Education CPIs: gr. 3 math; gr. 6 and 7 math
Large range between elementary Large range between elementary school scoresschool scores: gr. 5 math and science
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT STEPSDISTRICT IMPROVEMENT STEPS
Analyze and monitor student performance results
Implement intervention and challenge programs
Implement state funded MCAS high school tutoring programs
Continue use of test taking and instructional strategies
Align curriculum with Common Core State Standards
Revise/update curriculum, as necessary
Continue professional development programs
Continue use of supervision and evaluation process
MASSACHUSETTSACCOUNTABILITY
REPORTS
HHINGHAM INGHAM PPUBLIC UBLIC SSCHOOLS CHOOLS
DDISTRICTISTRICT20132013
MASSACHUSETTSMASSACHUSETTSACCOUNTABILTIY SYSTEMACCOUNTABILTIY SYSTEM
School Percentiles (1-99): Overall performance compared to other schools with same grade span
Accountability and Assistance Levels (1-5):Level 1 – highest performing to Level 5 –lowest performing – reported for all students and high needs subgroup
MCAS Participation: Minimum of 95% students required
(ELA, math, science)
MASSACHUSETTS MASSACHUSETTS ACCOUNTABILTIY SYSTEMACCOUNTABILTIY SYSTEM
Annual Progress & Performance Index / PPI (0-100): Measure of improvement toward indicator targets over two years – target of 75+
Cumulative Progress & Performance Index / CPPI (0-100): Combination of assessment data including indicators on performance and growth over last 4 years – target of 75+
CPPI Indicators: Narrowing proficiency gap (ELA, math, science), growth (ELA & math), 10% increase scoring advanced (ELA, math, science), 10% decrease scoring warning/ failing (ELA, math, science), high school only-graduation and drop out rates
HINGHAM 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTSHINGHAM 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTSSCHOOL PERCENTILESSCHOOL PERCENTILES
East School 88 Foster School 88 PRS 98 South School 90 HMS 89 HHS 94
HINGHAM 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTSHINGHAM 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTSCUMULATIVE PROGRESS AND PERFORMANCE CUMULATIVE PROGRESS AND PERFORMANCE
INDEX AND STATE LEVELSINDEX AND STATE LEVELS
CPPI – TARGET 75
AllStudents
High NeedsStudents
Levels1-5
EAST 92 47 2
FOSTER 97 86 1
PRS 100 74 2
SOUTH 98 63 2
HMS 90 73 2
HHS 100 89 1
HINGHAM 94 71 2
HINGHAM 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTSHINGHAM 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS
School Percentiles – All Schools “Highest Performing”
CPPI – All Students – All Schools Exceeded Target – High Levels of Progress
CPPI – High Needs – Met Target/Level 1:Foster and HHS
CPPI – High Needs – Below Target/Level 2:East, PRS, South and HMS
DESE REQUIREMENTS LEVEL 2 SCHOOLSDESE REQUIREMENTS LEVEL 2 SCHOOLS
Analyze “High Needs” data
Review level of implementation of “Conditions for School Effectiveness”
Revise School Improvement Plans with interventions and support strategies
Disseminate DESE required Report Cards to parents
Prioritize Title I funding for Level 2 schools