1

Mesoscale Modeling Branch:Where We Are andWhere We’re Going

Geoff DiMego geoff.dimego@noaa.gov

301-763-8000 ext7221

7 December 2011

NCEP

Where the Nation’s climate and weather services begin

2

T O P I C S• Who we are (hasn’t changed, so I left it out)

• Observation Processing and Quality Control

• GSI Analysis and Data Assimilation

• HiResWindow and SPC runs

• NAM: NMMB + NEMS + Nesting

• Convergence of NAM+RUC/RR

• RTMA + Delayed Mesoscale Analysis

• B A C K U P S L I D E S

3

Obs Processing & QCHighlights: Current & Future

• BUFRLIB upgrade w/NCO (Q2FY2011)

• Mesonet Metadata effort (thank$ to Curtis Marshall & Tim Mcclung)– Broad & Aggressive Collection

– Storage in MySQL database

• NRL aircraft QC package (Q? 2012)– Ascents/descents generated as profiles

– Diagnose PBL ht from profiles (critical Ri)

– Enables PBL verification & analysis

• Level II Radar QC– Fixed major bug in height assignment

– Refined use of Level 2.5 (AK only) & Level 3

– Higher quality VAD wind profiles

• 400 day MySQL obs-dump database translation effort

NAM 12 hr Forecast Ri-Based PBL Height with Verifying RAOBs

Relationships in Metadata MySQL Database Courtesy Steve Levine

• Updated station dictionaries

• Expanded uselists

• Updated dynamic reject lists

• Derived direction-dependent reject lists

• Deriving time-dependent reject lists4

Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation

• Multi-Agency development effort led by NCEP/EMC– ESRL / GSD + ESRL / PSD– JCSDA: NOAA, NESDIS, NASA, DOD– Code management (SubVersion) with regression testing

• Community supported via DTC in Boulder– GSI Workshop and Tutorial June 28 - July 1, 2011

• Includes hybrid approach for EnKF + 3D- or 4D-VAR• Works for global & NEMS/NMMB on full or subset of model domain

/ resolution

• While full EnKF tested for global, regional tested with simple use of hybrid and we get improved results using GEFS as input ensemble

• Will test SREF for finer scale mass-wind & flow dependent BE

• Will then test HRRRE-TL storm scale ensemble of opportunity to extract cross-covariances of state variables with fields such as reflectivityGEFS & experimental EnKF

GSI Upgrade for NAM Includes:Global upgrade Spring 2011 Faster code (~9%), improved optimization

and additional optionsRecomputed background errorsLimit moisture to be >= 1.e-10 in each outer

iteration and at the end of analysisLocate buoys at 10 m (from 20 m)Ambiguous vector qc for ASCAT dataSatellite radiance related changes

Update to radiative transfer model - CRTM 2.0.2Inclusion of Field of View Size/Shape/Power for

radiative transferRelax AMSU-A Channel 5 QCRemove down weighting of collocated radiancesInclusion of uniform (higher resolution) thinning

for satellite radiances

Stratospheric satelliteImproved OMI QC Removal of redundant SBUV/2 total ozoneRetune SBUV/2 ozone ob errorsInclusion of SBUV from NOAA-19

New ob sources for NAM Fall 2011

New conventional obs– MESONET ps, T, q

– ACARS moisture (WVSS-II)

– MAP Profiler winds– RASS Profiler Tv

– WINDSAT & ASCAT ocean winds (from scatterometer)

New unconventional obs– Satellite Radiances

• AMSUA from aqua & NOAA19

• HIRS4 & MHS from NOAA19

• IASI from METOP-A

– Refractivity• GPS radio occultation

6

~2.7 Million New Observations Per Day after NAM Upgrade

• Upper Air ~43K– RASS 126 t = 1403 – MAP 227 uv= 8859– AIRCAR133 q = 8533– WDSATR 289 uv =17392– WDSATR 290 uv =7198

• Surface ~1170K– MESONET 188 q = 393341 – MESONET 188 t = 453584 – MESONET 188 p= 322949

• New Satellite ~1528K– Radiance

• NOAA19 AMSUA= 151214

• NOAA19 HIRS4 = 65914

• AQUA AMSUA= 83794

• IASI METOPA= 1227199

– Refractivity

• GPS-RO [COSMIC] = 54589

7

Guam

18Z

06Z

00Z12Z

00Z12Z

06Z18Z

00Z12Z

4.0 km WRF-NMM

5.15 km WRF-ARW

48 hr fcsts from both

Unless there are hurricanes

Expanded PR/Hispaniola domain

March 2011 Upgrade of HiResWindowBriefing Package can be seen HERE

• Sized to fit on the previous CCS!• Upgrade NMM & ARW to WRF v3.2 with improved passive advection in both cores

• Add Guam runs

• Add product generation: High Resolution Ensemble Forecast (HREF), BUFR, and SPC hourly max, fire wx and 80m agl fields.

• Now on NOMADS & ftp server • NOW on SBN/NOAAPORT too !!! • Daily displays of these runs can be seen at:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/ andhttp://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll/nestpage/

• Matt Pyle’s full CONUS NMM runs [ /00 or /12 ] for SPC can be seen at http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mpyle/cent4km/conus/

New Output Fields from HiResW[also added to NAM and soon to GFS]

• Hourly maxima of:– 1000 m reflectivity

– updraft velocity

– downdraft velocity

– updraft helicity

– 10 m wind speed

– 2 m temperature

– 2 m RH

• Hourly minima of:– 2 m temperature

– 2 m RH

• 80 m AGL U + V wind

• 80 m AGL temperature

• 80 m AGL spec humidity

• 80 m AGL pressure 

• Radar echo top height (18 dBZ level)

• Richardson Number based PBL height

• Ventilation Rate

• Transport Wind

9

10

HiResWindow WRF v3.1+ Configurations

(No Parameterized Convection)Dynamic Core WRF-NMM WRF-ARW

Horizontal Spacing 4.0 km 5.1 km

Vertical Domain35 levels 50 mb top

Sigma-Pressure

35 levels 50 mb top

Sigma

PBL/Turbulence MYJ YSU

Microphysics Ferrier WSM3

Land-Surface NOAH NOAH

Radiation

(Shortwave/Longwave)GFDL/GFDL

Lacis-Hansen/Fels-SchwartzkopfDudhia/RRTM

Advection of Passive Variables

Conservative Positive Definite

Monotonic Positive Definite

11

HiResWindow Evaluations

• HPC liked it (acceptable qpf bias), but

• SPC didn’t like it (anemic storm structure)

… sigh …• Mitigation for SPC: Matt Pyle will continue to

run twice daily WRF-NMM runs with the old passive advection scheme (but using v3.3 eventually). Matt Pyle Webpage

12

Plans For 2012-13 HiResWindow• Upgrade ARW to WRF version 3.3• Replace WRF-NMM with NEMS-NMMB• Increase resolution to ~3 km• Expand to full CONUS

– CONUS, Hawaii & Guam at 00z and 12z– Alaska, Puerto Rico-Hispaniola at 06z and 18z– How soon can AWIPS distribution adapt to this?

• Improve Initialization of HiResWindow runs– GSI using all available data & mini-NDAS– GSI adapted specially for Level II winds– Digital filter with Level II reflectivity (ala RUC/RR)

• Some or all of the above• Replace HREF product stream with routine

construction of HRRRE-TL

There is Agreement & Commitment on a ‘One NOAA’ Modeling Framework

• This goes back to the first days of Admiral L.

• The ultimate target is a completed NOAA framework of ESMF components within which NOAA scientists can work efficiently

• Consistency with NUOPC is expected as well

• NCEP has been building NEMS for this purpose

• Community involvement is expected / encouraged

• Support for ESMF has moved permanently from NCAR/SCD to NOAA/ESRL

13

NEMS Component StructureMAIN

EARTH(1:NM)

Ocean Atm Ice

Below the first dashed line, the source codes are organized by the model developers.

FIM

Dyn

Phy

Wrt

NEMS

GFS

Dyn

Phy

Wrt

NMM

Solver

Nest Domains(1:ND)

Wrt

All boxes represent ESMF components.

NEMSLAYER

ARW

Dyn

Phy

Wrt

14common physicslayer

Ensemble Coupler

GOCARTWRFChem

WRFChem

Runtime & optimal node apportionment for NMMB nesting with a Fire Wx nest over CONUS (30 nodes): 12 hr fcst in 1619 s [Matt Pyle]

3 km Puerto Rico nest 1.5/30 or 5%

1.33 km CONUS FireWx nest 5/30 or 17%

4 km CONUS nest 17/30 or 57%

15

3 km Hawaii nest 1.5/30 or 5%

12 km parent 3/30 or 10%

6 km Alaska nest 2/30 or 7%

WRF-NMM takes 3.6 times longer to run comparable nesting with Fire Wx nest over CONUS (30 nodes): 12 hr fcst in 5857 s [Matt Pyle]

4 km* Puerto Rico nest 30/30 or 100%

1.33 km CONUS FireWx nest 30/30 or 100%

4 km CONUS nest 30/30 or 100%

16

4 km* Hawaii nest 30/30 or 100%

12 km parent 30/30 or 100%

4 km* Alaska nest 30/30 or 100%

17

More Stats Showing Improved Computational Speed & Efficiency

• Runtime for NAM with 5 nests on 72 nodes:

Current opnl code: > 4 hours

New code: 70 minutes

• New NAM is doing 11 times more work than the current NAM, but uses only 7.7 times more compute resources!

• IBM estimates the NMMB will easily scale to at least 24,000 processors (if we could ever get them)

Why Does NMMB Run So Much Faster?NMMB NMM

Runtimes 1619 s 5857 s 3.6 x faster

Contribution to speed up

New Model Dynamics

NMMB NMM ~2%

Infrastructure NEMS WRF ~2%

Nesting

• NMMB specific• Outside of the NEMS infrastructure• Processor apportionment• 1-way nests solved simultaneously

• ~Core independent* • Part of the WRF infrastructure• No processor apportionment• 1-way nests solved sequentially

~96%

Horizontal resolution step-

down ratio

Any integer ratio, e.g. 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, …

Only 3:1*0% - this relates to flexibility, not

speed18

Hypothetical NMMB Simultaneous Run Global [with Igor & Julia] and NAM [with CONUS nest]

27 km Global NMMB27 km Global NMMB

12 km NAM NMMB

12 km NAM NMMB

4 km NAM-nest NMMB

9 km Igor NMMB

9 km Julia NMMB

Hypothetical NMMB Simultaneous Run• This graphic demonstrates both where we are with NMMB nesting

and where we want to go.

• This loop was made by super-imposing just two NMMB runs: – NAM with a fixed CONUS nest (it could have included Alaska, Puerto

Rico-Hispaniola and a Fire Weather nest too) – global NMMB with two movable nests for Igor and Julia (it could have

included a movable nest inside Igor and/or Julia as well)

• This is all done with one-way interactive lateral boundaries, but if you took away the heavy black grid outlines, you'd be hard pressed to pick out where they were.

• Once the nesting is generalized, everything in the loop will be doable in a single NMMB executable.

• Greatly facilitates running global and regional forecasts concurrently which is our goal in the JPSS era when sat obs are to be delivered quickly enough to start global & regional at the earlier regional time. 20

21

October 2011 NAM Upgrade

Current NAM• WRF-NMM (E-grid)• 4/Day = 6 hr update• Forecasts to 84 hours• 12 km horizontal grid

spacing

New NAM see briefings here & here

• NEMS based NMMB• B-grid replaces E-grid• Parent remains 12 km to 84 hr• Four Fixed Nests Run to 60 hr

– 4 km CONUS nest– 6 km Alaska nest– 3 km HI & PR nests

• Single placeable 1.33km or 1.5 km Single placeable 1.33km or 1.5 km FireWeather/IMET/DHS run to 36hrFireWeather/IMET/DHS run to 36hr

NPS & Changes to NDAS• NEMS Preprocessing System

(NPS) for NMMB (Matt Pyle)– To create the first guess at the

start of the NDAS (at time T-

12hr), NPS uses GFS spectral

coefficients rather than post-

processed pressure level fields

on a 1 deg lat/lon grid as has to

be done with WRF

Preprocessing System (WPS)

– Lateral boundary conditions also

based on GFS spectral

coefficients (as is done in current

NAM but not in WRF REAL)

• Changes to the NAM Data Assimilation System (NDAS)

– First guess at T-12 reflects

relocation of tropical cyclones

– Use of 1/12th deg SST

(RTG_SST_HR) in place of ½ deg

– GSI updates 2 m temperature &

moisture and 10 m winds with

portion of 1st layer correction

– Updated background errors for

NMMB

– 5X divergence damping in NMMB

in NDAS only

22

Much Better NDAS First Guess [vs RAOBs]

23

Z T

V RH

March 2011

Black/Solid = Opnl

Red / Dash = Parallel

Scaled down BMJ convection for NMMB nests

• Different model forecast customers interpret high-resolution guidance differently (e.g. HPC vs SPC)

• With the NMMB implementation in NAM, an effort was made to satisfy both camps – sorta kinda.

• New scaling factor in the BMJ allows for relaxation toward moister profiles in finer grid-spacing runs:

– Smaller modification of thermodynamic profiles

– Goal is to improve QPF performance in nests without destroying fine-scale forecast structure

24

6 km NMMB nest 48 h total precip ending 20100722/00Z

w/o parameterized convectionMax precip = 4.91”

w/ scaled down BMJ convectionMax precip = 3.39”

25

SPC likes it, but HPC hates it. HPC loves it, but SPC hates it.

More acceptance by SPC after anemic vertical velocities are corrected with bug fix in August.

• The NAM nests were not designed or tuned to provide the severe weather guidance needed by SPC

• The NAM nests were designed to provide NWS WFOs and other users with basic weather guidance, e.g. QPF

• The nest resolutions were selected to match the NDFD grids on which WFOs produce their gridded forecasts

• Currently, the NAM-DNG WFOs use to initialize their GFE, is downscaled from NAM’s 12 km to local NDFD resolutions [5.9-2.5 km] by the not-so-accurately-named “smartinit” processing

• Having NAM nests will mean very little (if any) downscaling will be needed to produce NAM-DNG

Non Severe Weather Applications of the NAM 4km Nest

26

• NAM-DNG is already distributed to WFOs via AWIPS-SBN and thus available to private sector users via NOAAPORT. This is the primary distribution mechanism for NAM nest fields including QPF and newly added simulated reflectivity.

• Also available on ftp servers and NOMADS. Viewable from Eric Rogers’ most excellent webpages.

• New double resolution NAM-DNG grids will be made for CONUS and Alaska which anticipate the future move of NDFD to those resolutions and recognize & support the fact that a majority of WFOs are already doing their forecast prep at those double resolutions.

• NWS/HQ, the OSIP/TOC/SBN enterprise, NCO & EMC have geared up to distribute the new NAM-DNG grids. Only remaining choke-point is at the TOC.

Dissemination of NAM Nests via NAM-DNG

27

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll/firewx/

28

NOAA/ARL’s HYSPLIT Dispersion Model

• Wild-fire smoke applications driven by NAM, NAM nests & FireWx IMETSupport runs via NOAA/ARL’s READY-testbed site

• Example for March 11, 2011 fires in Central OK: Harrah and Chatow counties

Irene AssessmentPlaceable FWIS Nest in NAM Parallel

• This is a fixed nest run at 1.33 km resolution within the 4km CONUS NAM nest.

• First placement was outside the NAM’s CONUS nest and failed.

• Eric Rogers ran 24th 12z case over the counter• Starting with 18z run 8/25 FWIS was placed by

SDM ahead of (initially) or over Irene (later sadly) as it moved up the east coast.

Convergence of NAM & RR into hourly NARRE & HRRRE

• There is a signed agreement between NCEP/EMC and ESRL/GSD to build an hourly updated NARRE• Based on NEMS common modeling infrastructure• Ensembles:

• Sample uncertainty within membership• Initial & Lateral Boundary conditions• Dynamics & Physics

•Provide full description of uncertainty•Can adapt to rapidly evolving science of underlying data assimilation and modeling

2012NAM

• NEMS based NMMB• Bgrid replaces Egrid• Parent remains at 12 km to 84 hr• Multiple Nests Run to 60hr

– 4 km CONUS nest– 6 km Alaska nest– 3 km HI & PR nests

• Reinstate Fire Weather/IMET Support/DHS run to 36hr– Locate a single 1.33-1.5 km1.33-1.5 km run– In either CONUS or Alaska

Rapid Refresh• WRF-based ARW• NCEP’s GSI analysis• Expanded 13 km Domain

to include Alaska• Experimental 3 km HRRR

RUC-13 CONUS domain

WRF-Rapid Refresh domain – 2010

Original CONUS domain

Experimental 3 km HRRR

34

34

2015-2016?North American Rapid Refresh

ENSEMBLE (NARRE)• NMMB (from NCEP) & ARW (from ESRL) dynamic cores• Common use of NEMS infrastructure and GSI analysis• Common NAM parent domain at 10-12 km• Initially ~6 member ensemble made up of equal numbers of

NMMB- & ARW-based configurations• Hourly updated with forecasts to 24 hours• NMMB & ARW control data assimilation cycles with 3 hour

pre-forecast period (catch-up) with hourly updating• NAM & SREF 84 hr forecasts are extensions of the 00z, 06z,

12z, & 18z runs – for continuity sake.– SREF will be at same 10-12 km resolution as NARRE by then– SREF will have 21 members plus 6 from NARRE for total of 27

• NARRE requires an increase in current HPCC funding35

36

2017-2018?High Resolution Rapid Refresh

ENSEMBLE (HRRRE)• Each member of NARRE contains 3 km nests

– CONUS, Alaska, Hawaii & Puerto Rico/Hispaniola nests– The two control runs initialized with radar data & other hi-res obs

• This capability puts NWS/NCEP[+OAR/ESRL] in a position to – Provide NextGen Enroute AND Terminal guidance (FWIS-like)– Provide PROBABILITY guidance with full Probability Density

Function specified, hence uncertainty information too– Provide a vehicle to improve assimilation capabilities using hybrid

(EnKF+4DVar) technique with current & future radar & satellite– Address Warn-on-Forecast as resolutions evolve towards ~1 km

• NAM nests are extensions of the 00z, 06z, 12z & 18Z runs.

• HRRRE requires an increase in HPCC funding over and above that required for the NARRE

37

• Hourly updated 12/13km ensemble for aviation out to 12 hr

• Combines members from RR & NAM over CONUS & Alaska

• NARRE-TL example member combination for 06z cycle run

4 NAM cycles (6z & previous 0z, 18z and 12z)

6 RR cycles (6z & previous 5z, 4z, 3z, 2z, and 1z)

Member Weighting = 1 - forecast range (hr)/30:

06 09 1200 0318 211206

NAM RR

15 18 21 00

In the Meantime, Implement NARRE-TL*North American Rapid Refresh Ensemble (NARRE)

Time-Lagged [TL] System [courtesy of Binbin Zhou]

*To be implemented with the Rapid Refresh in Q2FY2012, replaces VSREF

• Take advantage of 5 existing convection allowing runs• Example: 14 member combination for 06Z cycle run 4 NAM-nest (6z & previous 0z, 18z and 12z)

2 HRW-ARW cycles (previous 0z and 12z)*

2 HRW-NMM cycles (previous 0z and 12z)*

2 Pyle-SPC cycles (previous 0z and 12z)

4 HRRR cycles (6z & previous 5z, 4z and 3z) **

06 09 1200 0318 211206

NAM-N:NMMB HRW: ARW HRW: NMM P-SPC:NMM

HRRR

15 18 21 00

High Resolution Rapid Refresh Ensemble (HRRRE) Time-Lagged [TL] System

38*Eastern 2/3 of CONUS for now **runs to 15 hr only

Next steps for NARRE-TL & HRRRE-TL• Build them and run them in/off parallels• Share with users including NWS, AWC, CoSPA & FAA• Perform Verifications • Icing vs CIP (Current Icing Product)• Reflectivity, Echo Top and VIL • Lightning?• Combine with AFWA’s 10 member 4 km ensemble for CONUS • Combine with hybrid approach (at least)• Implement HRRRE-TL as replacement for HREF

• Pursue use of cluster analysis to find most meaningful SREF members for hybrid approach

• Frequency matching bias correction & Other promising post processing techniques

• Ultimately, more computing is needed to allow more convection allowing forecast runs to reduce our dependence on time-lagged members

Brilliant Minds Think Alike

• Israel Jirak from SPC constructed Storm Scale Ensemble of Opportunity (SSEO), comprised of 7 convection-allowing members from 00 UTC:

NSSL WRF-ARW (01),HRW WRF-ARW East (02),HRW WRF-ARW East 12-hr time lag (03),CONUS WRF-NMM (04),HRW WRF-NMM East (05),HRW WRF-NMM East 12-hr time lag (06),NMMB-Nest (07).

I know Israel also put together a 12 UTC run, where the membership changes a bit. Also, SSEO only coverd the eastern CONUS domain since that is what is covered by current HiResWindow.

Figure 1. Experimental model performance based on participant feedback from subjective evaluation surveys conducted during the QPF component of the 2011 HWT Spring Experiment. Experimental deterministic models were

compared to the operational 12km NAM while experimental ensembles (SSEO and SSEF) were compared to the operational SREF.

2011 HWT Spring ExperimentHigh Resolution Model Performance Compared to the

NAM/SREF

11/57

16/63

25/69

30/6737/69

31/5642/68

22/57

39/63

29/69

18/67

14/69

16/56

9/68

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

SSEO NCEPNMMB nest

SSEF NSSL WRF-ARW

NCEPHRW-NMM

HRMOScontinuous

NCEPNMMB

Models

Pe

rce

nta

ge

improved guidance worse guidance

Google Map of 4 RTMA DomainsFirst Phase of Analysis of Record

Real Time Mesoscale Analysis

Analyzed every hour on the NWS’ NDFD grids10 m wind + est. anal. uncertainty

2m Temperature + est.anal.unc.

2m dew point + est.anal.unc.

Sfc pressure + est.anal.uncertainty1 hr precip (Stage 2)GOES Eff. Cloud Amount

Courtesy of Yan Zheng University of Utah

RTMA - Really Good News• Thanks to the efforts of Jamie Vavra (OST),

OSIP approval has been obtained to declare RTMA operational.

• The vote was unanimous with all regions in attendance.

• RTMA is considered to have met its FOC conditions.

• Continued effort by NCEP/EMC to improve it and extend it to more variables is assumed.

RTMA Winter 2011-12 UPGRADE PACKAGE

To Follow Rapid Refresh- Expand CONUS RTMA-2.5km domain further north into Canada to provide support for Northwest RFC

- Double the resolution for Alaska RTMA from 6 => 3km

- Add Juneau RTMA at 1.5km resolution

- Add routine cross-validation to RTMA runs

- Other RTMA Enhancements (blended first guess, analysis of wind gust, visibility, analysis error, use/reject lists, etc.)

EXPANDED CONUS RTMA-2.5km

NW

RF

C NDFD CONUS

Add Support of the Northwest RFC by expanding the CONUS 2.5-km domain northern boundary from 51 N to 56 N. In practice, added 220 pts in y-direction. Produce two GRIB2 files: One for true NDFD CONUS and the other for NWRFC domain.

Alaska-3kmNDFD

Juneau-1.5km

Contours: terrain in meters

ALASKA RTMA

- Change spatial resolution from 6-km to 3-km (doubling the resolution like was done last year for CONUS)

- Blend forecasts from Rapid Refresh and NAM to make first guess (work in progress)

- Make mesonet observation accept list (Levine)

JUNEAU RTMA

-New system at 1.5-km resolution.

ROUTINELY COMPUTE CROSS-VALIDATION

- Make multiple disjoint datasets for each ob type, each containing about 10% of the data but uniformly distributed. Datasets contain representative data from all the geographical regions observed but without the redundancy of close pairs or tight clusters

- Constructed with the help of Hilbert curve

- For each analysis, randomly pick one of the disjoint datasets to use for cross-validation

Other RTMA Enhancements

• Add blending of first guess 10m winds with 10m winds from Hurricane WRF to improve handling of tropical systems.

- Add analysis of wind gust & horizontal visibility

- Improve global rescaling of analysis uncertainty

- Synchronize all RTMA applications (RTMA CONUS, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico and Guam) to use the same code and features (e.g. FGAT, bias correction, improved observation accept and reject lists)

49

Future Plans for RTMA, AoR & DNG

• Use HiResWindow as first guess for Guam• Expand RTMA variables: sea-level pressure, cloud amount,

cloud base height, PBL height, etc.• Add GLERL coastal observation adjustment to increase ob

density along coast of (at least) Great Lakes• Improve wind analyses over oceans (sat winds)• Apply non-linear quality control within the GSI

• Bias correct 1st guess prior to applying smartinit

• Pursue dynamical methods sensitive to terrain for downscaling the wind

• Pursue Delayed Mesoscale Analysis (now funded)

• Apply DNG to RUC

• Add/Fix Weather Type for DNG NAM & GFS

• Retire DGEX [once DNG-NAM beats it]

T h a n k s !

A n y

Q U E S T I O N S ?50

B A C K U P

S L I D E S

51

52

Air Quality Modeling Progress

Meteorological Model Coupling

• Coupled with NEMS-NMM-B for

all CMAQ domains (CONUS, AK, HI)

CMAQ Model (Developmental testing)

• Included wild fire smoke sources

• Retrospective tests of 4 km CMAQ driven by NAMB nest

• Real-time testing of AIRNOW PM data assimilation

HYSPLIT Regional Model

• Experimental interim dust system over CONUS

• Improvements to Volcanic Ash and RSMC Capabilities

Upgrade to CMAQ V4.7

• Update Emissions from 2008 NEI, include smoke

• Tight grid coupling w/ NAM-B

• Improved gas/aerosol mechanisms

• Implement surface PM data assimilation

Global NGAC

• Implement on-line dust system

Developmental Testing

• 4 km NAM-B nest coupling

• NGAC full PM LBC coupling with CMAQ

• Surface O3 and GOES/MODIS AOD data assimilation

53

Air Quality Modeling FY12 Plans

Air Quality Implementation Matrix

54