micro- and nanoparticle technology fixed and fluidized beds · fixed and fluidized beds micro- and...

36
21. April 2020 Fixed and Fluidized Beds Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology Dr. K. Wegner - Lecture 21.04.2020

Upload: others

Post on 19-Oct-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 21. April 2020

    Fixed and Fluidized BedsMicro- and Nanoparticle Technology

    Dr. K. Wegner - Lecture 21.04.2020

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 2

    Flow through a packed bed of particles

    Applications, e.g. - Flow of liquid or gas through a

    filter cake - Flow of reactants through a bed

    of catalyst particles- Fixed bed separators for

    adsorption of substances- Fixed bed dryer

    crossA

    HDpipedP

    FV

    ϕ fraction volume Particle

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020

    Simple cubicpacking

    0.526ϕ =0.741ϕ =

    Random packing0.6ϕ ≈

    Bed structures for monodisperse spheres

    Face-centeredcubic packing

    εϕ −== 1volume Total

    particles of Volume :fraction volume Particle

    porosity, void fractionor “voidage”

    3

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 4

    For simplicity, the dimensionless numbers (e.g. Reynolds-#) are formed with the velocity of the approaching flow uA.

    Fluid velocity for fixed beds:

    reltionseccross

    F0A vA

    Vuu ===−

    uA: velocity of the approaching flowu0: superficial velocity (“Leerrohrgeschwindigkeit”)vrel: relative velocity

    Attention! The real velocity inside pores is:ε

    0uvlocal =

    !Def.

    For a fixed bed with random packing: 02.5localv u≈ ⋅

    Particles are stationary: c = 0

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 5

    Pressure drop across a packed bedFrench engineer Henry Darcy observed 1856 that the flow of water through a packed bed of sand is governed by:

    0p u H∆ ⋅

    A few years before, Poiseuille and Hagen investigated laminar flow through capillaries:

    1

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 6

    1

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 7

    The hydraulic diameter DH is defined as:

    area surface wettedtube in volume fluid4

    perimeter wettedareaflow 4Dh

    ⋅=

    ⋅=

    Hydraulic diameter for a packed bed:

    00

    44A

    VAVD Fh

    ⋅⋅=

    ⋅=

    ε

    with A0: surface area of pores ≈ surface area of particles

    Using the volume-specific surface area: PV VAA ⋅=0

    ( ) VAVD

    Vh ⋅−⋅

    ⋅⋅=

    εε

    14

    The cross-section is not circular. Use an equivalent diameter:

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 8

    ( )2201 1 2 02 3

    14ebed V

    h

    u Hp C C C H u AD

    εη η

    ε ε−

    ∆ = ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅

    ( )223 0 3

    1bed Vp C H u A

    εη

    ε−

    ∆ = ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅

    C3 typically has values of 3.5 – 5.5 for porosities of 0.32 – 0.45.

    Carman-Kozeny equation for laminar flow through randomly packed particles

    ( )202 3

    1180bed

    P

    H upd

    εηε−⋅ ⋅

    ∆ = ⋅ ⋅( )2 20

    3

    1180Re

    bedF

    P P

    p uH d

    ερ

    ε−∆

    =or

    Hagen-Poiseuille law modified for laminar flow through a packed bed:

    ReP < 1

    For monosized spheres with AV=6/dP and C3=5 (Rep < 1):

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 9

    Empirical correlation covering laminar and turbulent flow:

    Applicable to fluids with constant ρF, ηF and to homogeneous beds containing a large number of particles.

    empty,Fbed ppp ∆−∆=∆

    ( )F

    P

    bed

    du

    Hp ρ

    εεψ ⋅−⋅=∆

    20

    31 ( )1150 1.75

    ReP

    εψ

    −= +with

    Note:

    Ergun equation for 1 < ReP < 4000

    S. Ergun (1952), Chem. Eng. Prog. 48, 89-94.

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 10

    Derive an average specific force for the packed bed by comparing the flow forces (drag force) acting on the bed with its apparent weight:

    ( )( ) ( )( )1 1bed cross bedD

    G B cross P F P F

    p A pFnF F A H g H gε ρ ρ ε ρ ρ

    ∆ ⋅ ∆= = =

    − ⋅ ⋅ − − ⋅ ⋅ − − ⋅

    ( )20

    3D F

    G B P P F

    uFnF F g d

    ρψε ρ ρ

    = =− ⋅ −

    with Ergun-eq.:

    ( )FPF

    PFrn ρ−ρρ

    ⋅ψε⋅

    = 23 43

    34

    For flow opposing the gravitational force: 1n <

    n

    forces nalgravitatio

    forces inertial

    pp dg

    uFr⋅

    =20

    ( ) ( )FPF2

    Pp Fr43Ren

    ρ−ρρ

    ⋅α=Compare single sphere:

    with :

    (Re , )pξ ϕ

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 11

    Applications of packed beds in industrySeparation processes: Absorption

    Packed bed absorption columns used in a natural gas dehydration.Image: Bertsch GmbH; Austria

    Laboratory gas purification column with zeolitesImage: W.A. Hammond Drierite Co Ltd, USA

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 12

    Applications of packed beds in industrySeparation processes and off-gas treatment: Scrubbing

    Scrubbers are used to wash out undesired pollutants from gas streams, esp. acidic gases.In wet scrubbing, pollutants are absorbed in a solution where a packed bed is often used to increase the liquid surface area. In dry scrubbing, pollutants are absorbed on particles (e.g. in a packed bed).

    Image: Benitez (2009), Principles and modern applications of mass transfer operations, J. Wiley.

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020

    Applications of packed beds in industry

    13

    Distillation columns in an oil refinery Examples of packing materialPacking in distillationcolumn (B/R Instr. Corp.)

    Increase of interface area between liquids and gasses to improve mass transfer and separation efficiency.

    Separation processes in manufacturing of chemicals:Distillation, extraction

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 14

    Chemical reactions over a fixed bed of catalyst particles Applications of packed beds in industry

    Typical particle diameters: 2 mm (high pressure drop) – 10 mm (low specific surface area)Challenge: Heat management, esp. for exothermic reactions

    A) Adiabatic and B) multi-tube fixed bed reactor with heat removal.Ertl, Knözinger, Weitkamp, “Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis” Vol 3, Wiley-VCH, 1997

    Example: Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis

    e.g. nCO + (2n+1) H2 → CnH2n+2 + nH2O

    Type B reactor with iron catalyst (200 m3)200 – 250°C, 25 bar. Removal of reaction heat by pressurized(boiling) water.

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 15

    Fluidizing a bed of (catalyst) particles can yield to the following advantages over fixed bed reactors:

    Fluidized bed reactors

    • Smaller particles can be used, increasing the solid-fluid exchange area.

    • Uniform temperature distribution due to intensive solids mixing (no hot spots).

    • High heat transfer coefficients between bed and immersed heating or cooling surfaces.

    • Uniform product in batch-wise process because of intensive solids mixing

    • Easy handling and transport of particles due to fluid-like behavior.

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 16

    Cycloneseparator

    Fluidizationgas, in

    Distributorplate

    Gas, out

    Gas bubbles

    Solidsrecirculation

    Circulating Fluidized BedFluidizedBed

    Ertl, Knözinger, Weitkamp, “Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis” Vol 3, Wiley-VCH, 1997

    Examples of fluidized bed reactors

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020

    Examples of fluidized bed reactors

    17

    Example: Fischer-TropschSynthesis with the “Synthol” reactor, a type of circulating fluidized bed reactor

    (a) Hopper with Fe-catalyst particles(b) Standpipe with catalyst(c) Riser(d) Heat exchanger tube bundles(e) Reactor

    Mean porosity in riser: 85%3 – 12 m/s gas velocity; 350°C

    Ertl, Knözinger, Weitkamp, “Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis” Vol 3, Wiley-VCH, 1997

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 18

    Synthol Reactor at SasolSasol: South African Synthetic Oil Ltd.(originally) Suid-Afrikaanse Steenkool en Olie

    Images: www.sasol.com (right) and UMichigan (top);

    http://www.sasol.com/

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 19

    Applications of fluidized beds

    Physical ProcessesDrying, coating, granulation, absorption, mixing

    Chemical ProcessesReaction (on catalyst particles), combustion (e.g. coal),absorption

    Example:Fluidized bed coating(“Wurster coater”)

    Fluidization air

    Distributor plate

    Spray nozzle

    Coating solution spray

    Particle recirculation

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 20

    Fluidized bed reactors generally have the following drawbacks:

    Disadvantages of fluidized bed reactors

    • Expensive solid separation and gas purification because of solids entrained in fluidizing gas.

    • Erosion of internals and attrition of solids resulting from high particle velocities.

    • Possibility of de-fluidization due to agglomeration of solids “inhomogeneous fluidized bed”

    • Backflow of (product) gas because of high solids mixing rate resulting in lower conversion.

    • Undesired reaction gas bypass or broadening of the residence time distribution in case of inhomogeneous bed fluidization.

    • Scale-up can be difficult.

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 21

    States of mobility in fluid-solids systems

    Liquid-solidssystems

    Dispersion(dense)

    Dispersion(dilute)

    Fixed bed

    increasing fluid velocity

    Gas-solidssystems

    Fixed bed Bubbles Chokingslugging

    Strands Dispersion

    Homogeneousfluidized bedIdeal state

    Fixed bed → Fluidized bed → Particle transport / conveying

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 22

    Powder fluidization according to GeldartGeldart (1973) classified powders according to their fluidization properties in air at ambient T and p:

    Group A: Initially non-bubbling fluidization, followed by bubbling fluidization and bed expansion with increasing fluid velocity. Stable bubble size is reached; good mixing and homogeneity. Small particle size and/or low density

    Group B: Only bubbling fluidization; coalescence of bubbles. Some bed expansion; good mixing (< Group A), homogeneity.Most powders

    Geldart, D. (1973), Powder Technol. 7, 285-292.

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 23

    Group C:Very fine cohesive powders, which are incapable of fluidization. Strong interparticleforces. Formation of channels and discrete plugs but no bubbles.

    Fluidization problems might be overcome by mechanical action (vibration / stirring)

    Source: A. Rhodes, “Introduction to Powder Technology”; 2nd ed. 2008, J. Wiley

    Geldart powder classification

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 24

    Source: H. Schubert “Handbuch der mechanischen Verfahrenstechnik”, 2003; Wiley-VCH

    Geldart powder classification

    Sauter diameter

    (ρP

    –ρ F

    ) in

    kg/m

    3

    Group D: Large particles. Formation of slowly rising large bubbles that can lead to spouting. Little mixing and bed homogeneity.

    A spouting bed (right) is a fluid bed in which the air forms a single opening through which some particles flow and fall to the outside.Image: Rhodes (2008).

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 25

    Source: A. Rhodes, “Introduction to Powder Technology”; 2nd ed. 2008, J. Wiley

    Umf: minimum fluidization velocity

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 26

    Forces in different fluidization states Bulk solids Fluidized bed Solids transport Compressive forces (buoyancy) Viscous forces Gravity Inertial forces Friction forces betw. particles Friction forces particles - wall Impact betw. particles Impact particles - wall Clustering of particles due to shape Adheasive / repulsive forces

    x x x x

    x x x x x

    (x) x

    (x) x x

    x x x x x x x x

    (x) x

    Higher particle mobility leads to a larger number of forces. To be considered as well:Spatiotemporal distribution of particles.Velocity, momentum, mass, concentration, temperature,...Even today, the mathematical description of such systems is hardly possible.

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 27

    Similarity of fluid-solids flows A general similarity description of fluid-solids flows is not possible.

    Further:

    ( )

    1) Geometric similarity of systems

    2) Re

    3)

    4)

    A PP

    F

    AP

    P

    F

    P F

    u d const

    uFr constg d

    const

    ν

    ρρ ρ

    ⋅= =

    = =⋅

    =−

    • No forces due to friction, impact or adhesion• Flow direction opposing gravity• Monodisperse spheres• Homogeneous bed: no demixing/segregation

    Circulating fluidized beds, solids transport:

    0A relu v u c= = −u0: superficial velocity; c: particle velocity

    Fixed beds, stationary fluidized beds:

    0 ; 0A relu u v c= = =

    Simplify:

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 28

    Δp in fluidized beds and upright particle transport

    Acceleration of particles along dh;differential momentum balance:

    dh

    u0

    u0

    p

    p-dp c+dc

    c

    1) Pressure drop keeping particles floating (stationary fluidized bed with height H, Across):

    ( ) ( ) gHApA FPcrossfloatzcross ⋅−⋅⋅⋅=∆⋅ ρρϕ( )( )

    zp n 1floatP FH gϕ ρ ρ

    ∆⇒ = =

    ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅

    2) Pressure drop due to acceleration of particles (transport)

    ( ) dcmdpA Pacccross ⋅=⋅

    ( ) ∫∫ =H

    P

    H

    acccross dcmdpA00

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 29

    :nnacc factor load the to onaccelerati particle the of onContributi

    ( )( )

    ( )cross z accDacc

    G B cross P F

    dcA pF dtnF F A H g gφ ρ ρ

    ⋅ ∆= = ≈

    − ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅

    Total pressure drop: ( ) ( )z z zfloat accp p p∆ = ∆ + ∆

    Load factor: ( ) accFPz n

    gHpn +=

    ⋅−⋅⋅∆

    = 1ρρϕ

    ( ) ( )0 0 cross acc cross z z H P z H z PA p A p p m c c m c= = = =⋅ ∆ = ⋅ − = ⋅ − = ⋅ ∆

    After the acceleration phase, particle transport can be considered a uniformly moving fluidized bed.

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020

    Pressure drop vs. fluid velocity for fixed and fluidized beds

    ( )ε ϕ0 01= −

    Fluidized bed Expandingfluidized bed

    Fluidized bed

    Particle transport

    Fixed bed

    0, L constϕ ϕ = 0 0ϕ ϕ> >

    minimum fluidization velocity umf

    log

    Δp

    log u

    0 0ϕ ϕ> >

    ( ) 01 εϕε >−= LL

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 31

    Assume monodisperse spheres and homogeneous flow against gravity.

    Flow through particle bedsDescription of the states of motion

    ( ) ( )23Re 1

    4F

    P PP F

    n Fr ραρ ρ

    = ≥−

    ( ) ( )23, Re 1

    4F

    P PP F

    n Fr ρξ ϕρ ρ

    = <−Packed bed:

    Floating and transportof single particles:

    Fluidized bed, floating: ( ) ( )23, Re 1

    4F

    P PP F

    n Fr ρξ ϕρ ρ

    = =−

    Particle transport: ( ) ( )23, Re 1

    4F

    P PP F

    n Fr ρξ ϕρ ρ

    = >−

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 32

    Drag coefficient for homogeneous fluidized beds Based on experiments, Lewis, Gilliland and Bauer developed a correlation describing drag in homogeneous fluidized beds by comparison with a individual sphere (α) settling with its terminal velocity:

    ( ) ( ) ( )( ) 654654 1

    .P

    .P

    PReReRe,ϕ

    αε

    αϕξ−

    ==

    The correlation can be applied for the range φ ≈ 0.6 (beginning fluidization) to φ → 0 (floating single particles).

    sphere, terminal

    nAuu

    ε= withRe < 1: n = 4.65 (typical)1 ≤ Re ≤ 500: n = 4.45 Re-0.1Re > 500: n = 2.4

    Re < 1

    W.K. Lewis, E.R. Gilliland, W.C. Bauer (1949), Ind. Eng. Chem. 41, 1104.J.F. Richardson, W.F. Zaki (1954), Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 32, 35.

    Richardson and Zaki:

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 33

    Substitute

    ( ) ( )3

    22

    3 Re Re4

    p fpp p

    f f

    g dAr

    ρ ρξ

    ν ρ

    −⋅= ⋅ =

    Substitute

    ( ) ( )3 Re4

    3 Reprel f

    f p f p

    vg v

    ρρ ρ ξ

    Ω = =⋅ −

    p

    fprel d

    Rev

    ν⋅=

    rel

    fpp v

    Red

    ν⋅=

    depends only on fluid and particle properties!

    ( )2 2

    3

    Re3Re 14

    p f fp

    p p f

    ng d

    ν ρξρ ρ

    = ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ =⋅ −

    Archimedes-#

    Omega-# or Lijatschenko-#

    Proceed similar to the definition of Ar and Ω numbers for single sphere at steady state but now ξ(φ,ReP) instead of α(ReP).

    Ar-Ω diagram for fluidized bed

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 34

    Ar-Ω diagram forhomogeneous fluidized bedsof monodisperse spheres

    Ar =g dP3 (ρP - ρF )νF2 ρF

    = 34 ξ (ϕ, ReP) ReP2

    Ω =vrel3 ρFνF g (ρP - ρF )

    =43

    RePξ (ϕ, ReP)

    10 4

    10 3

    10 2

    10 1

    10-8

    10-7

    10-6

    10-5

    10-4

    10-3

    10-2

    10-1

    100

    101

    102

    103

    104

    105

    106

    ReP = 10 0

    n 1

    ϕ=0.6

    , n=1

    10 -2

    ϕ=0,

    n=1

    Schüttgut

    Förderung

    homoge

    ne Wi

    rbelsc

    hicht

    n = 1

    Schw

    eben

    Einz

    elpart

    ikel

    Lock

    erung

    Sch

    üttun

    gEr

    höhu

    ng R

    elat

    ivge

    schw

    indi

    gkei

    t

    10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109

    Ar

    particle transportn>1

    bulk solids1

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 35

    General Ar-Ω diagram for a fluidized bed taking also inhomogeneous fluidization into account“Red” region:homogeneous fluidized bed(e.g. for liquid-solids systems)“Pink” region:inhomogeneous fluidized bed(often observed for gas-solids systems)

    Circulating fluidized beds, particle transp.

    0A relu v u c= = −u0: superficial velocity; c: particle velocity

    Remember:Fixed beds, stationary fluidized beds:

    0 ; 0A relu u v c= = =

  • Micro- and Nanoparticle Technology - FS2020 36

    Fluid-solids reactors - Overview

    SolidsGas

    Bulk solids / Fixed bed Fluidized bed Solids transport

    Type of reactor

    overflow

    throughflow

    Fluidized bed

    Circulating Fluidized bed

    Typical reactors • Muffle kiln • Multi-decker passage kiln • Rotary kiln • Belt-dryer

    • Toploader kiln • Grate stoker furnace / kiln • Furnaces for pellets

    heating

    • Fluidized bed • Fluidized bed roaster • Multi-decker fluidized bed

    • Circulating fluidized bed • Venturi fluidized bed

    • Flash dryer • Cyclone-preheater • Smelting cyclone • Burner

    Particle movement by: Mechanics Gravity Mechanics Gravity

    Fluid flow Gravity

    Fluid flow

    Gas/solids flow counter-flow co-flow

    cross-flow

    co-flow counter-flow (in steps) cross-flow (in steps)

    Co-flow Single stream reflux counterflow (steps)

    Particle size small to very large medium to very large medium very small - small very small

    Particle residence time hours - days hours minutes seconds or less

    Gas residence time seconds seconds seconds or less

    Heat & mass transfer very low low - medium high very high very high

    Temperature control medium - good bad - medium good very good medium - good

    Space-time yield very low - medium medium medium - high high very high

    Gas

    Solids

    Fixed and Fluidized BedsFlow through a packed bed of particles Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Pressure drop across a packed bedSlide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Applications of packed beds in industryApplications of packed beds in industryApplications of packed beds in industryApplications of packed beds in industryFluidized bed reactorsExamples of fluidized bed reactorsExamples of fluidized bed reactorsSlide Number 18Applications of fluidized bedsDisadvantages of fluidized bed reactorsStates of mobility in fluid-solids systemsPowder fluidization according to GeldartGeldart powder classificationGeldart powder classificationSlide Number 25Forces in different fluidization statesSimilarity of fluid-solids flows Δp in fluidized beds and upright particle transportSlide Number 29Slide Number 30Flow through particle beds�Description of the states of motionDrag coefficient for homogeneous fluidized beds Slide Number 33Slide Number 34Slide Number 35Fluid-solids reactors - Overview