7/27/2019 Microcosm and Its Object of Ideation Corrected

1/3

Microcosm and Its Object of Ideation12 May 1979 DMC, Fiesch, Switzerand

!oday"s disco#rse is, $Microcosm and Its Object of Ideation%& !he microcosm is of macro'(sychic

conation, and as s#ch a the attrib#tions of Macrocosm, a the r#es of Macrocosm are (resent in themicrocosm aso, b#t in a miniat#re form% )y nat#re, the microcosm is an objecti*ated co#nter(art of

Macrocosm and it, bein+ within the infinite sco(e of Macrocosm, +oes on mo*in+ and mo*in+% !he(ath is of infinite en+th% It wi +o on mo*in+ ti it reaches that definite +oa% hat sho#d be the +oa-

It is the one of the (sychic wont is that any object ta.es the form of its +oa, i%e%, it is transm#ted into itsobject% So, the object of ideation for the microcosm is to be seected *ery caref#y% /ow et #s see

what sho#d be the best object of ideation-

First of a, ta.e the case of the !em(#s, the !em(#s 0terna% hat it is- It is a (sychic meas#rement of

the moti*ity of action% /ow, can it be the object of ideation-

It cannot be the object of ideation beca#se the first thin+ is, it is a (sychic meas#rement% For (sychic

meas#rement there m#st be a (sychic body, i%e% the #nit (sychic body, and when the #nit (sychic bodymeas#res it, it cannot be the S#(reme 0ntity% ence it cannot be the object of ideation%

!he second thin+ is, second re#isite factor is that it is (sychic meas#rement, to meas#re, it is a *erb%3sychic meas#rement means (sychic mobiity and (sychic mobiity means a chan+e of s(ace%!he entity that re#ires a (sychic chan+e of (ace or chan+e of s(ace cannot be the S#(reme 0ntity% For

this reason aso, the tem(#s eterna cannot be yo#r object of ideation%

!he third thin+ is, this meas#rement is on moti*ity or the mobiity or moti*ity of action% hat ismoti*ity or mobiity- It is aso based on the chan+e of (hysica (ace or s(ace% hen this (hysica

word was first created, then the meas#rement of action is to be done by the (sychic body of theMacrocosm% So the fact is that the entity whose e4istence, whose *ery e4istence de(ends #(on these

(hysica or (sycho'(hysica factors cannot be the S#(reme 0ntity% So here we see that the tem(#seterna is not o#r +oa5 it cannot be o#r +oa5 it is not somethin+ (sychic, it is not e*en somethin+

abstract% It is somethin+ cr#der than h#man bein+s5 h#man bein+s are the creators of this entity, henceit is not o#r object of ideation, it cannot be o#r object of meditation, it cannot be o#r object of adoration

or e4atation%

!hen ta.e the case of /at#re% !here were some (ersons or there were some (erson in the (ast who were

worshi((ers of nat#re, worshi((in+ trees or s.y% 6i.e this% Can nat#re be the object of ideation- /o,

certainy not% hat is nat#re- /at#re is the name of a (artic#ar stye accordin+ to which the O(erati*e3rinci(e f#nctions% It is sim(y a stye% !hat stye cannot be the object of meditation or ideation% nd

the second thin+ is, as nat#re is nothin+ b#t a stye ony, if that stye becomes the object, then the *eryentity wi be con*erted into a stye ony% It is a fooish idea% So s#ch nat#re worshi((ers, may be

earned schoars, b#t they mo*e in foos" (aradise% /at#re cannot be yo#r object of ideation%

!he third is Fate% !here were and there are many (eo(e who are fataists% !hey are worshi((ers of fate% fataist means a worshi((er of fate 8 a worshi((er of fort#ne and fate% !hey are worse than nat#re'

worshi((ers% hat is fate- !here is nothin+ caed fate in this #ni*erse% So far as the (hioso(hy cansay, there cannot be anythin+ caed fate% hat is fate- hen each and e*erybody wi ha*e to #nder+o

the reaction of his (ast actions, when the ori+ina action is .nown, we say that it is the reaction of (astaction% S#((ose yo#r fin+er comes in contact with fire5 yo# wi +et the (ain, yo# wi ha*e to s#ffer

b#t, at that moment yo# wi say or yo# wi fee that beca#se the fin+er came in contact with fire, that"swhy he is #nder+oin+ the tro#be% )#t when the reaction ta.es (ace after a on+ +a(, and when the

ori+ina action is not .nown or for+otten, or the ori+ina action too. (ace in another (ast ife, there isnot .nown what was the ori+ina action 8 in that case yo# say, it is fate, it is fate% )#t act#ay there is

no fate% hat yo# ca fate is act#ay the reaction of o#r (ast actions% In sams.rta, it is caed sams.ara, in 6atin $reacti*e momenta&%

!hen the third thin+ is, so this fate cannot be the object of ideation 8 fate is sim(y the reaction ofori+ina action% So when there is no ori+ina action, there cannot be any reaction% So, reaction is a

creation of yo#r own action% hen reaction is a creation of yo#r own action, yo# are the creator yo# are

the father of reaction% So, how reaction can be yo#r object of ideation- /o, a man m#st not be a fataist,

7/27/2019 Microcosm and Its Object of Ideation Corrected

2/3

a man m#st not be a fate'worshi((er, a man sho#d be bod he sho#d body face a tro#bes, aconse#ences% e m#st not be fataist% So fate cannot be the object of meditation% Fi+ht a+ainst fate%

!hen, some (eo(e say that these are of accidenta creations% !his #ni*erse is an accidenta creation%

!hat accident is the root ca#se of this creation% ccident is the :OD beca#se it has created the word,and so accident sho#d be the object of ideation% It is aso a fooish idea%

hat is ccident- !here is nothin+ caed ccident 8 e*erythin+ is Incident% hen an action is

materiaized within the short s(an, or within a *ery short s(an time, or when the root ca#se of theaction is not .nown to #s, we are j#st seein+ the reaction, we are seein+ the incident% hen the ca#se,

when the ca#sa side of the incident is not .nown to #s, or when the ca#sa side is transated into actionwithin a *ery short s(an we say it is an accident% )#t act#ay nothin+ is accidenta, e*erythin+ is

incident% )eca#se of o#r f#tiity, or beca#se of o#r want of .nowed+e, we say it is accidenta% hen

the ca#sa side, when the ca#sa factor is transated into action within a *ery short s(an, say within afew seconds, we say it is accident, when it is transated into action sowy, we do not say it is accident,

we say it is an incident% So, accident is not somethin+ (ro*identia, or accident is not somethin+

beyond the sco(e of time, s(ace and (erson% )eca#se a accident, a accident ta.es (ace within thesco(e of time, s(ace and (erson% !he entity that is within the, not beyond the (eri(hery of time s(ace

and (erson cannot be yo#r +oa, cannot be yo#r object of ideation, cannot be yo#r object of meditation,

cannot be yo#r creator or the so#rce of e4atation%

Some (eo(e say, these #in#eementa factors of which this #ni*erse is made of- hat are these

#in#eementa factors- !hey are nothin+ b#t a condensed form of ener+y% nd what is ener+y- It isnothin+ b#t the condensed form of (sychic stamina% !hen, how these #in#eementa factors of this

e4(ressed word can be the object of Ideation- !hey cannot be yo#r +oa, they cannot +oad yo# #ntothe (ath of beatit#de% So those who are worshi((ers or meditators of #in#eementa factors are

mis+#ided (eo(e% !hey are j#st wastin+ their ener+y for nothin+%

Some (eo(e are of o(inion that the Cosmic ener+y is the ori+ina so#rce or the ca#sa matri4 of the#ni*erse, and hence this ca#sa matri4 sho#d be the object of ideation% )#t what is this ca#sa Matri4-

!his Cosmic 0ner+y cannot be re+arded as the ca#sa matri4 beca#se it is a bind force% 0ner+y is abind force, eectricity is a bind force 8 it is bein+ controed by the h#man inteect% So the Cosmic

0ner+y, ha*in+ no inteect#a s#((ort behind it, cannot be the ca#sa matri4, beca#se e*erywhere inthis #ni*erse we see e*erythin+ is in an ordery stye, i%e% there is an somethin+ intei+ence behind theCosmic 0ner+y% nd that is why there is order e*erywhere, there is system e*erywhere% !he entire

creation is of a systematic order5 so it cannot be the creation of a bind force or bind ener+y% !here

m#st be some inteect#a force behind it% So Cosmic 0ner+y cannot be treated as the ca#sa matri4, andcannot be ascribed to it% /o :odhood can be ascribed to it% It cannot +et the stat#s of the ca#sa matri4%

Some (eo(e are of the o(inion that there is the so#, there is s(irit in each and e*ery str#ct#re and that

s(irit is the +oa of o#r ife% ;o# see, there are so many s(irits and so#s associated with so manymicrocosms, b#t they ha*e to f#nction #nder certain imitations% !hey cannot +o beyond the arena of

microcosms% n object, or rather an entity ha*in+ s#ch a imited sco(e i.e #nit s(irit or #nit co+niti*efac#ty cannot be yo#r object of ideation, cannot be the S#(reme Creator%

!hen, ho is yo#r object of ideation, ho sho#d be yo#r object of ideation- ho is the fac#ty thatcreates yo#, feeds yo#, and ta.es yo# on is a( when the (ro(er time comes- e is the Co+niti*eForce behind the Cosmic 0ner+y% e contros the Cosmic 0ner+y with is inteect#a and Int#itiona

(ower% e is the 3arama 3#r#sa and act#ay e is the ca#sa matri4, and so e sho#d be yo#r onyobject of ideation, ony object of meditation, and e is the S#(reme Father% !here is no other

aternati*e b#t to mo*e aon+ is (ath< e .noweth a% )e one with im%

/ow from the *ery start of yo#r ife in distant (ast and #( to the fina c#mination of a yo#rmo*ements and marches yo# are with im, yo# wi be with im and #nder no circ#mstances yo# can

be away from im% So e 8 the 3arama 3#r#sa, is the ony object of ideation%

!he root meanin+ of the term )aba is $the dearest one& or $the nearest one&% s e is the S#(reme

Father, the 3arama 3#r#sa, e is )aba of the entire creation5 and beca#se yo# are the created bein+s,

yo# are is o*in+ chidren, yo# are aso is )aba 8 beca#se )aba means $nearest and dearest one&%s e is yo#r ony object of ideation, as is name is the ony (rojection of yo#r microcosmic entity,

7/27/2019 Microcosm and Its Object of Ideation Corrected

3/3

ony tho#+ht'(rojection, ony intro*ersia (rojection 8 intro'c#m'e4tro*ersia (rojection 8 so is namesho#d be aways with yo# 8 in yo#r mind, in yo#r ton+#e, in yo#r *oca cord, e*erywhere% nd I fee,

and I aso reaize, and that is why I say, when is de*otees, is chidren, sin+ )aba /am =e*aam,e aso sin+s )aba /am =e*aam%

=ayanamast#