misha ivanov surprising strong field dynamics in laser filaments lasing without inversion in the air...
TRANSCRIPT
Misha IvanovMisha Ivanov
Surprising strong field dynamics in laser filaments
• Lasing without inversion in the air (N2)
• Bound states of a free electron
• Lasing without inversion in the air
D.Kartashov, S. Haessler, G. Andriukaitis, A. Pugžlys, A. BaltuškaD.Kartashov, S. Haessler, G. Andriukaitis, A. Pugžlys, A. Baltuška
A. ZheltikovA. Zheltikov
J. Möhring, M. MotzkusJ. Möhring, M. Motzkus
M. Richter, F. Morales, O. SmirnovaM. Richter, F. Morales, O. Smirnova
M. SpannerM. Spanner
Laser filamentation: the bare basicsLaser filamentation: the bare basics
)()(
)(
20
20
rInnrn
InnIn
Kerr effect and Kerr lensKerr effect and Kerr lens
tFtntd
cos1
)()(2plasma
• Self-guided beam, can move very far• Interplay of self-focusing and defocusing • Self-guided beam, can move very far• Interplay of self-focusing and defocusing
Laser filamentation: the bare basicsLaser filamentation: the bare basics
• Looks pretty •Broad spectrum: UV- IR• Looks pretty •Broad spectrum: UV- IR
Strong field molecular alignment: the bare basicsStrong field molecular alignment: the bare basics
Induced dipole:d(E)= xE cost
- oscillates with the field
Cycle-averaged interaction energy:U()=- ¼ [E2cos2
Induced dipole:d(E)= xE cost
- oscillates with the field
Cycle-averaged interaction energy:U()=- ¼ [E2cos2
N2 Field-free alignment after a short pulseN2 Field-free alignment after a short pulse
F cost
Key facts for today
• Air is made of molecules, mostly N2• Air is made of molecules, mostly N2
• Filamentation by-product I: They rotate
• Filamentation by-product I: They rotate
Key facts for today
• Air is made of molecules, mostly N2• Air is made of molecules, mostly N2
• Filamentation by-product II: molecular ions N2+• Filamentation by-product II: molecular ions N2+
1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.00
2
4
6
8
354,89
356,39
388,43
210
1
B2u
A2u
X2g
Energ
y, eV
internuclear distance, A
0
391,44
427,81
358,21En
ergy
, eV
Ener
gy, e
V
R, ÅR, Å
N2+N2+
• Filamentation by-product I: They rotate
• Filamentation by-product I: They rotate
Key facts for today
• Air is made of molecules, mostly N2• Air is made of molecules, mostly N2
• Filamentation by-product II: molecular ions N2+
• Filamentation by-product III : broad spectra, one-photon transitions can saturate
• Filamentation by-product II: molecular ions N2+
• Filamentation by-product III : broad spectra, one-photon transitions can saturate
1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.00
2
4
6
8
354,89
356,39
388,43
210
1
B2u
A2u
X2g
Energ
y, eV
internuclear distance, A
0
391,44
427,81
358,21En
ergy
, eV
Ener
gy, e
V
R, ÅR, Å
N2+N2+
B(v=0) -> X(v=0): 391 nmB(v=0) -> X(v=0): 391 nm
• Filamentation by-product I: They rotate
• Filamentation by-product I: They rotate
Key facts for today
• Air is made of molecules, mostly N2. Filamentation makes them rotate• Air is made of molecules, mostly N2. Filamentation makes them rotate
• You do not even need to saturate X-> B to make it lase !• You do not even need to saturate X-> B to make it lase !
1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.00
2
4
6
8
354,89
356,39
388,43
210
1
B2u
A2u
X2g
Energ
y, eV
internuclear distance, A
0
391,44
427,81
358,21En
ergy
, eV
Ener
gy, e
V
R, ÅR, Å
N2+N2+
B(v=0) -> X(v=0): 391 nmB(v=0) -> X(v=0): 391 nm
Inversion without inversion
X
B
X
B
• Inversion without inversion: • Inversion without inversion:
• B -> X is a parallel transition • B -> X is a parallel transition
• More X molecules than B molecules: PX>PB
• But more aligned B molecules than X molecules: PB (=0)>PX(=0)
• More X molecules than B molecules: PX>PB
• But more aligned B molecules than X molecules: PB (=0)>PX(=0)
Inversion without inversion
Wup ~ <cos2>X PXWup ~ <cos2>X PX
Wdown ~ <cos2>B PBWdown ~ <cos2>B PB
Gain: Wup - Wdown < 0Gain: Wup - Wdown < 0X
B
X
B
• Inversion without inversion: • Inversion without inversion:
R=PB/PX=1/2R=PB/PX=1/2
Almost transient inversion
Transient inversion induced by rotations
Wup - WdownWup - Wdown
R=PB/PX=1/2R=PB/PX=1/2
Almost transient inversion
Transient inversion induced by rotations
• Lasing without inversion: transient inversion during rotational revivals• Better alignment – smaller R is needed for transient inversion • Lasing without inversion: transient inversion during rotational revivals• Better alignment – smaller R is needed for transient inversion
R=PB/PX=3/4R=PB/PX=3/4
Transient inversion
Wup - Wdown Wup - Wdown
Experiment I: Bright emission
• Forward, well collimated• Needs a seed:
Appears only when filamentation generates spectrum around 390
• Forward, well collimated• Needs a seed:
Appears only when filamentation generates spectrum around 390
300 350 400 450 5000
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000S
pect
ral i
nte
nsi
ty
wavelength, nm
9th
11th
391 emission in N2+
4 m pump4 m pump
391 nm beam
Another candidate ?
• Emission due to coherent polarization •a.k.a. Wave mixing, Parametric emission,...
• Emission due to coherent polarization •a.k.a. Wave mixing, Parametric emission,...
DXB(t)= < X(t)|d|B(t) > DXB()= FT (DXB(t))
DXB(t)= < X(t)|d|B(t) > DXB()= FT (DXB(t))
• General • only needs coherence between N2
+ (X) and N2+(B)
• all it needs is a seed around 390 nm• will happen for all pump wavelengths that make filaments
• Will last after the filament is gone, as long as X-B coherence lasts• Natural sensitivity to rotations
Coherent polarization / Wave mixing: Effect of rotations
• Requires overlap of X(t) and B(t)• Requires overlap of X(t) and B(t)
• DXB(t)= <X(t)|d| B(t)> + c.c.• DXB(t)= <X(t)|d| B(t)> + c.c.
• Rotations with different period kill the overlap and DXB(t)• Rotations with different period kill the overlap and DXB(t)
Opposite temporal patterns
‘Wave mixing’ ‘Wave mixing’
• Need time-resolved measurements !• Need time-resolved measurements !
Wup
- W
dow
n W
up -
Wdo
wn Inversion without
inversionInversion without inversion
• Experiment @ 1.03 m, 240 fsec• Experiment @ 1.03 m, 240 fsec
Experiment II: Time-resolved measurements
• Starts immediately, • Lasts ~ 15 psec• Follows revivals in N2
+ B state
• Starts immediately, • Lasts ~ 15 psec• Follows revivals in N2
+ B state
Time-resolved signal: Experiment vs Theory
Experimental FROG SpectraExperimental FROG Spectra ‘Wave mixing’ FROG (Theory)‘Wave mixing’ FROG (Theory)
Time-resolved signal: Experiment vs Theory
Experimental FROG SpectraExperimental FROG Spectra Excellent Disagreement !Excellent Disagreement !
Time-resolved signal: complementary patterns
Transient InversionTransient Inversion ‘Wave Mixing’‘Wave Mixing’Experimental FROG SpectraExperimental FROG Spectra
R=1R=1
Experiment vs Theory
Transient InversionTransient Inversion
• Lasing without inversion:• Threshold effect: better alignment – smaller R=PB/PX is needed• Let us optimize alignment!
• Lasing without inversion:• Threshold effect: better alignment – smaller R=PB/PX is needed• Let us optimize alignment!
R=3/4R=3/4
Experimental FROG SpectraExperimental FROG Spectra ‘Wave Mixing’‘Wave Mixing’
Experiment III: Optimized alignment
3 ba
r
N2+ emission: more
than 104 brighter for optimal pulse sequence
x 10-4
delay,ps
Optimal sequence Optimal sequence
The smoking gun?
Felipe MoralesFelipe MoralesMaria RichterMaria Richter
Serguei PatchkovskiiSerguei Patchkovskii
Olga SmirnovaOlga Smirnova
Bound states of a free electron
NRC Canada
What is common between these?What is common between these?
Laser filamentation in the air
Ilya Repin: Barge haulers on Volga
Laser filamentation: the bare basicsLaser filamentation: the bare basics
)()(
)(
20
20
rInnrn
InnIn
Kerr effect and Kerr lensKerr effect and Kerr lens
tFtntd
cos1
)()(2plasma
)(])()([)( *)3( FFFd
Is ionization needed for filamentation?Is ionization needed for filamentation?
Intensity
1013 W/cm2
n(I) Kerr effect, n(I), in air @ 800 nm
• Is this really possible, and if possible – when, why, and how?• Is this really possible, and if possible – when, why, and how?
Acceleration of neutrals: ‘free’ electron pulling the parent ionAcceleration of neutrals: ‘free’ electron pulling the parent ion
But how is the rope made? But how is the rope made?
Very strong laser field:Up=F2/42~ KeV
k
r
e-e-
+
~ m
He, 800 nm, ~1016 W/cm2
-zFcost
What happens when the laser intensity is very high?
Oscillation amplitude 0=F/2 >> AngstromOscillation amplitude 0=F/2 >> Angstrom
-zFcost
Does above-barrier decay necessarily mean ionizationionization? Again NO!Does above-barrier decay necessarily mean ionizationionization? Again NO!
How the rope is made: frustrated ionizationHow the rope is made: frustrated ionization
How the rope is made: The Kramers-Henneberger atomHow the rope is made: The Kramers-Henneberger atom
Include both:Bound again!
Bound electronIdea: W. Henneberger PRL, 1968
Very strong laser field:nearly free oscillations
+
Bound states of the KH potential make the ropeBound states of the KH potential make the rope
Bound states of the free electronBound states of the free electron
-zFcost
6.1014 W/cm2
800 nm
The electron is placed at the exit from the barrier, simulating tunnel ionization. It refuses to behave ionized in 15-20% of cases.
The electron is placed at the exit from the barrier, simulating tunnel ionization. It refuses to behave ionized in 15-20% of cases.
Kerr response in strong low-frequency laser fieldsKerr response in strong low-frequency laser fields
-zFcost
Note: • at I~1013 W/cm2 all excited states are way above barrier, and ground state is well below• Oscillation amplitude 0> 6 a.u is large
Pertinent to all phenomena which include response of bound states in strong fields, e.g. Kerr effect around and above 1013 W/cm2
Kr, Xe, Ar, O2, N2, @1013 W/cm2
- zFcost
AnalysisAnalysis
In the KH regime for the excited states, En(F)=En+Up+En
The ground state still goes down: Eg(F)=Eg-Eg
Intensity ,>1013W/cm2
En (F,) – bound states of a ‘free’ electron
Eg(F,)
Energy
Intensity
inst(I,)
Can this be seen with everything else (ionization, real excitation) piling up on top?Can this be seen with everything else (ionization, real excitation) piling up on top?
n gn
ng
tFEtFE
tFztFtd
),(),(
|),(|2cos)(
2
Any signatures of this physics? TDSE for 3D HydrogenAny signatures of this physics? TDSE for 3D Hydrogen
Grid Spacing Z Time step 1: 0.2 0-100 +/-200 0.0052: 0.2 0-100 +/-400 0.005 2x: 0.2 0-200 +/-800 0.005 3: 0.1 0-100 +/-400 0.00125
2x2 1
Field, z axisField, z axis
axis
400 a.u.
800 a.u.1600 a.u.
Role of box sizeRole of box size
2x2 1
Field, z axisField, z axis
axis
400 a.u.
800 a.u.1600 a.u.
Role of the box size: • Absorb more, or less, free electrons• See how this changes the Kerr response
Role of the box size: • Absorb more, or less, free electrons• See how this changes the Kerr response
High order Kerr effect: TDSE for 3D HydrogenHigh order Kerr effect: TDSE for 3D Hydrogen
Short pulse: sin2 with 4 cycles turn-on and turn-off, =0.9 mShort pulse: sin2 with 4 cycles turn-on and turn-off, =0.9 m
High order Kerr effect: TDSE for 1D HydrogenHigh order Kerr effect: TDSE for 1D Hydrogen
Short pulse: sin2 with 4 cycles turn-on and turn-off, =1.8 mShort pulse: sin2 with 4 cycles turn-on and turn-off, =1.8 m
High order Kerr effect: TDSE for 1D HydrogenHigh order Kerr effect: TDSE for 1D Hydrogen
Short pulse: Gaussian FWHM=4 cycles, =1.8 mShort pulse: Gaussian FWHM=4 cycles, =1.8 m
Saturation of the Kerr response• Happens just before ionization kicks in• Once ionization kicks in, it takes over• HOKE is real, but is important in a very narrow intensity window• KH states are playing major role
Saturation of the Kerr response• Happens just before ionization kicks in• Once ionization kicks in, it takes over• HOKE is real, but is important in a very narrow intensity window• KH states are playing major role
Conclusions: Lasing without inversion
• Laser filamentation leads to• Very broad spectrum
-> Easy saturation of 1-photon transitions in the ion: IR-nearUV• Ionization • Molecular alignment
• Rotational revivals naturally create time-windows with population inversion• Better alignment – better lasing ‘without inversion’
Conclusions: HOKE
• In general, saturation of the Kerr effect comes from:• Ionization (major player) • Real excitations to ‘bound states of the free electron’• Modification of the instantaneous response (i.e. virtual transitions) due to restructuring of the dressed atom.
• Restructuring of the atom leads to saturation and – partly – to the onset of the reversal of the Kerr effect
• This happens just before ionization kicks in• Ionization starts to dominate as soon as it kicks in
• The interplay of the three effects is strongly pulse-shape dependent
Proposal for HOKE Consensus
Misha and Rob agreed to build a Russian wet-sauna. But they could not agree on what floor is best
Rob : We should shave and sand the floorMisha: No, we shouldn’t. Sanded floors get slippery when wet,
we can slip and fallRob: No, Misha, we should. If we don’t sand the floor, we’ll get splinters into our bare feet!
Proposal for HOKE Consensus
Misha Ivanov and Bob Levis agreed to build a Russian wet-sauna. But they could not agree on what floor is best
Rob : We should shave and sand the floorMisha: No, we shouldn’t. Sanded floors get slippery when wet,
we can slip and fallRob: No, Misha, we should. Otherwise we’ll get splinters!
They went to ask the Rabbi.
Rabbi, who is right? Rabbi, who is right?
Proposal for HOKE Consensus
Misha and Rob agreed to build a Russian wet-sauna. But they could not agree on what floor is best
Rob : We should shave and sand the floorMisha: No, we shouldn’t. Sanded floors get slippery when wet,
we can slip and fallRob: No, Misha, we should. Otherwise we’ll get splinters!
They went to ask the Rabbi.
Rabbi, who is right? You are both right!You are both right!
Proposal for HOKE Consensus
Misha and Rob agreed to build a Russian wet-sauna. But they could not agree on what floor is best
Rob : We should shave and sand the floorMisha: No, we shouldn’t. Sanded floors get slippery when wet,
we can slip and fallRob: No, Misha, we should. Otherwise we’ll get splinters!
They went to ask the Rabbi.
We can’t both be right!We can’t both be right!You are both right!
Proposal for HOKE Consensus
Misha and Rob agreed to build a Russian wet-sauna. But they could not agree on what floor is best
Rob : We should shave and sand the floorMisha: No, we shouldn’t. Sanded floors get slippery when wet,
we can slip and fallRob: No, Misha, we should. Otherwise we’ll get splinters!
They went to ask the Rabbi.
We can’t both be right!Yes you can!Yes you can!
Proposal for HOKE Consensus
Misha and Rob agreed to build a Russian wet-sauna. But they could not agree on what floor is best
Rob : We should shave and sand the floorMisha: No, we shouldn’t. Sanded floors get slippery when wet,
we can slip and fallRob: No, Misha, we should. Otherwise we’ll get splinters!
They went to ask the Rabbi. OK, Rabbi, we can’t argue with you. But what shall we do with the floor? Shall we sand the floorboards or not?
OK, Rabbi, we can’t argue with you. But what shall we do with the floor? Shall we sand the floorboards or not?
Yes you can!
Proposal for HOKE Consensus
Misha and Rob agreed to build a Russian wet-sauna. But they could not agree on what floor is best
Rob : We should shave and sand the floorMisha: No, we shouldn’t. Sanded floors get slippery when wet,
we can slip and fallRob: No, Misha, we should. Otherwise we’ll get splinters!
They went to ask the Rabbi.
You should sand the floorboards, But put them sanded side down
You should sand the floorboards, But put them sanded side down
High order Kerr effect: TDSE for 3D HydrogenHigh order Kerr effect: TDSE for 3D Hydrogen
Short pulse: Gaussian FWHM=4 cycles, =0.9 mShort pulse: Gaussian FWHM=4 cycles, =0.9 m
4.3 1013 W/cm2
• Kerr is saturated• No box size dependence!
4.3 1013 W/cm2
• Kerr is saturated• No box size dependence!
5.6 1013 W/cm2
• Kerr is reversed• Box-size dependence
5.6 1013 W/cm2
• Kerr is reversed• Box-size dependence
Field, a.u.
Short pulse: Gaussian FWHM=4cycles, =1.8 mShort pulse: Gaussian FWHM=4cycles, =1.8 m
High order Kerr effect: TDSE for 3D HydrogenHigh order Kerr effect: TDSE for 3D Hydrogen
4.3 1013 W/cm2
• Kerr is saturated• No box size dependence!
4.3 1013 W/cm2
• Kerr is saturated• No box size dependence!
5.6 1013 W/cm2
• Kerr is reversed• Box-size dependence
5.6 1013 W/cm2
• Kerr is reversed• Box-size dependence
Field, a.u.
Short pulse: Gaussian FWHM=4 cycles, =1.8 mShort pulse: Gaussian FWHM=4 cycles, =1.8 m
High order Kerr effect: TDSE for 3D HydrogenHigh order Kerr effect: TDSE for 3D Hydrogen
4.3 1013 W/cm2
• Kerr is saturated• No box size dependence!
4.3 1013 W/cm2
• Kerr is saturated• No box size dependence!
5.6 1013 W/cm2
• Kerr is reversed• Box-size dependence
5.6 1013 W/cm2
• Kerr is reversed• Box-size dependence
Saturation of the Kerr response• Happens just before ionization kicks in• Once ionization kicks in, it takes over• HOKE is real, but is important in a very narrow intensity window
Saturation of the Kerr response• Happens just before ionization kicks in• Once ionization kicks in, it takes over• HOKE is real, but is important in a very narrow intensity window
Field, a.u.
Are the KH states really there? TDSE for 1D HydrogenAre the KH states really there? TDSE for 1D Hydrogen
m
Resonances are still present, even for =3 m
=3m
Flat-top pulse: sin2 Turn-on/off in Ncycles=4 cycles, 40 cycles flat topFlat-top pulse: sin2 Turn-on/off in Ncycles=4 cycles, 40 cycles flat top
• Deviations from standard model are much more prominent for flat-top pulses• KH states are responsible for resonances
• Deviations from standard model are much more prominent for flat-top pulses• KH states are responsible for resonances
Field, a.u.
‘The KH atom exists’ means ‘Only few Vn
matter’
+ harmonics Vn (,2)
free electron oscillations
If the KH harmonics act like perturbative fields, we can use
standard Photo-Electron Spectroscopy idea: En,kphoto=En+k
Photo-electron spectroscopy of the KH atomPhoto-electron spectroscopy of the KH atom
Ip = 4.34 eV : Barrier suppression intensity I=1.5 x 1012
W/cm2
Barrier suppression regime is easily achieved with routine setup
Laser wavelength 800 nm, 3D, linear polarization, TDSE
The system: Potassium atomThe system: Potassium atom
How the rope is made: frustrated ionizationHow the rope is made: frustrated ionization
Oscillation amplitude 0=F/2 >> AngstromOscillation amplitude 0=F/2 >> Angstrom
• T. Nubbemeyer, K. Gorling, A. Saenz, U. Eichmann, and W. Sandner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 233001 (2008)
• G. Yudin and M. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. A, 63, 033404 (2001)
-zFcost
-zFcost
Suppose the electron tunneled out. Does this really mean ionizationionization? – No!
Suppose the electron tunneled out. Does this really mean ionizationionization? – No!
Kerr response in strong-field limitKerr response in strong-field limit
-zFcost
n gn
ng
tFEtFE
tFztFtd
),(),(
|),(|2cos)(
2
Eg
En (F,t,) – bound states of a ‘free’ electron;
On average, go up as Up=F2/42
n gn
ng
EE
ztFtd
2||2cos)(
Instantaneous response (virtual transitions only!) – almost like usual linear susceptibility – only for dressed states.Instantaneous response (virtual transitions only!) – almost like usual linear susceptibility – only for dressed states.
FROG
UV-spectrometer
UV-spectrometer
SHG
SHG spectrometer
Pharos(Light Conversion)SLM
Yb, Na:CaF2
Regen.
1,03 m, 500 Hz, 7 mJ, 240 fs
Experimental setupExperimental setup
FROG
UV-spectrometer
UV-spectrometer
SHG
SHG spectrometer
Pharos(Light Conversion)SLM
Yb, Na:CaF2
Regen.
1,03 m, 500 Hz, 7 mJ, 240 fs
Experimental setupExperimental setup
Spectroscopy of N2+
1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.00
2
4
6
8
354,89
356,39
388,43
210
1
B2u
A2u
X2g
Energ
y, eV
internuclear distance, A
0
391,44
427,81
358,21
What is the physical origin?What is the physical origin?
Bright coherent emission in forward directionBright coherent emission in forward direction
Observed linesObserved lines
Physical origin: Possible Candidates
• Stimulated emission due to population inversion in N2+: more B than X • Stimulated emission due to population inversion in N2+: more B than X
Transient inversion induced by rotations
• Lasing without inversion: transient inversion during rotational revivals• Better alignment – smaller R is needed for transient inversion • Lasing without inversion: transient inversion during rotational revivals• Better alignment – smaller R is needed for transient inversion
R=PB/PX=3/4R=PB/PX=3/4
Transient inversion
R=PB/PX=1/2R=PB/PX=1/2
Almost transient inversion
Wdown - Wup Wdown - Wup
Filamentation-based remote sensing of bad guys
Lasing backwardLasing backward
Send laser beamSend laser beam
FilamentFilament
Make a laser in the air, detect backward emissionMake a laser in the air, detect backward emission
Collect informationCollect information
Filamentation-based remote sensing of bad guys
Lasing backwardLasing backward
Send laser beamSend laser beam
FilamentFilament
Laser in the air that shoots backwards – not yet, not today Laser in the air that shoots backwards – not yet, not today
Collect informationCollect information
Laser in the air that shoots forward & without inversion - today Laser in the air that shoots forward & without inversion - today
• Experiment @ 1.03 m, 240 fsec• Experiment @ 1.03 m, 240 fsec
Time-resolved measurements
Frequency-integrated cross-correlation
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140.0
0.1
Revival of the excited ionic
state B2 B=2.073 cm-1
(anti-Stokes branch)
Cro
ss-C
orre
latio
n In
tens
ity
Delay, ps
Theory P(N
2)=1.8 bar (J une 28)
P(N2)=2.1 bar (J une 27)
Revival of the ground ionic
state X2B=1.92 cm-1
(Stokes branch)
Starts immediately, Lasts ~ 15 psecSensitive to rotations – but in N2
+ B state!Starts immediately, Lasts ~ 15 psecSensitive to rotations – but in N2
+ B state!