modeling and forecasting mortality rates
TRANSCRIPT
We thank the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs for supporting this research, and Learning & Technology Services for printing this poster.
Modeling and Forecasting Mortality Rates Modeling and Forecasting Mortality Rates Modeling and Forecasting Mortality Rates Modeling and Forecasting Mortality Rates
Andrew Smeed and Marie-Claire Koissi | Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire
A comparative Study with the A comparative Study with the A comparative Study with the A comparative Study with the LeeLeeLeeLee----Carter Carter Carter Carter Stochastic ModelStochastic ModelStochastic ModelStochastic Model
Past mortality models have failed to capture fluctuations and drasticdecline in human mortality rate. Thus, the human life expectancy wasunderestimated in general. This justified the need for more accuratemodels.
The stochastic model proposed by Lee and Carter (1992) seems to fitwell data from several countries. It is however still assessed andextensions are still proposed to improve the model’s efficiency.
This project examines the performance of the Lee-Carter model on datafrom selected countries in North America (Canada and USA) andEastern Europe. We use the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) andthe Maximum Likelihood (MLE) methods.
The LC model seems to capture the change in mortality in Canada andUSA, but presents some insufficiencies for the selected easternEuropean countries.
Beta parameter
USA, Canada
INTRODUCTION
describes average shape of age profile
METHODOLOGY
With the constraints, we can derive the expression for age-dependent parameter ��
SINGULAR VALUEDECOMPOSITION (SVD)
MAIN REFERENCES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Andrew Smeed received financial support through UWEC Blugold scholarship, which is greatly
acknowledged. The authors also thank the Human Mortality Database for providing the data for this
study.
BACKGROUND
THEMODEL: LEE-CARTER
THEMAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATE (MLE)
RESULTS
DATA
The number of deaths for people age x in year t , ��,� , follows a Poisson distribution with parameter λ�,� =��,��,�
��,�~Poisson���,� �,��
� ��,� ���,� ���,���,�����,���,�!
where ��,� = death rates for age x at year t�,� = exposure to risk for age x at year t
Assuming independent observations, the Full log-likelihood is
���,� ln �,��,�
!� �,��,�
!�ln���,�!��,�
We maximize the full log-likelihood with respect to λ�,� and obtain
estimates �"�, #$�, and %&�
�"� � �1/)��ln ��,��
*+� ln ��,� ! �"� � ,-.-/-0 1 ,2.2/201. . . . . 1,4.4/40
#$� � .-∑ �.-�66
� 7�1: 9, 1: 1�:;��7-�
where U is the matrix with .6 as components
The parameters #�and %� are estimated using the SVD method
%&� � ,-��.-�66
/-0 � ,-:;� 7- /-0
<= >?,@ � A? 1 B? C@1 D?,@
The Lee-Carter model for mortality forecasting provides the central death rates >?,@ of people age x at time t as follows
describes pattern of deviation from age profile when the time index %� varies
describes variation in level of mortality with time t
D?,@ ~ N(0, σ2) (White Noise, error term)
Model Constraints (for uniqueness of solutions)
∑ %�� � 0 and ∑ #�� � 1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
Ages
Beta
LC Beta Parameters
Bulgaria
Hungary
Lithuania
Russia
Zero line
Beta parameter
Bulgaria, Hungary, Lithuania and Russia,
• Aro and Pennanen. 2011, “A user-friendly approach to stochastic mortality modelling”. European Actuarial Journal, 1:151-167, 2011. ISSN 2190-9733.
• Lee, R. D., 2000. The Lee-Carter Method for Forecasting Mortality, with Various Extensions and Applications. North American Actuarial Journal, (4) 1, 80-91.
• Lee, R. D., Carter, L. R., 1992. Modeling and Forecasting U.S. Mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association. (87) 419, 659-675.
• Koissi, M-C.; Shapiro, A.; Högnäs, G. 2006. Evaluating and Extending the Lee-Carter Model for Mortality Forecasting: Bootstrap Confidence Interval. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38:1-20
Source: Human Mortality Database, www.mortality.org• Countries:
North America: US, Canada, Eastern Europe: Bulgaria, Hungary, Lithuania and Russia
• Ages: 0 to 100+, divided into 24 group (0,1], (1,5], (5,10], (10, 15]….• Years 1933-2010. 78 years total
MODELING
Time index parameter, kappa
USA, Canada
FORECASTINGˆ ˆAR IM A on { } forecasts { , 0}
t t sk k s
+⇒ >
1
, 1
ˆ ˆARIMA(0,1,0) :
ˆ ˆˆˆ log( ) ( )
t t t
x t x x t
k k c
m b k c
ε
α
+
+
= + +
⇒ = + +
Fitted and forecasted Time index parameter,
kappa, USA
Past mortality models underestimated• Decline in old-age mortality• Life expectancy (how long people were going to live on average).
Improvements in longevity during the 20th century• In developed countries, average life expectancy has increased by
1.2 months per year• Globally, life expectancy at birth has increased by 4.5 months per
year
Parties affected by longevity risks• Pension funds: Corporate or Government Sponsored• Annuity Providers: Insurance or Reinsurance companies• Individuals: outlive their resources and be forced to reduce their
living standards (or experience poverty at advanced ages)• Annuity providers and Pension funds may have inadequate
reserves.
Past mortality models
• De Moivre (1729):
• Gompertz (1825):
• Makeham (1860):
• Weibull (1951):
• Kannisto (1992):
• Heligman & Pollard (1980): (8 parameters)
1)( −−= xwxµ
xbx
x BCae ==µ
bx
x aec +=µ
b
x ax=µ
bx
bx
xae
aec
++=
1µ
xFxEBx
x
x HGeDAq
q C
++=−
−+2))/(log()(
1