national quality center (nqc)1 rw grantees in washington, dc presentation “recapture blitz”

23
National Quality Center (NQC) 1 RW Grantees in Washington, DC Presentation “Recapture Blitz”

Upload: dominic-haynes

Post on 13-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

National Quality Center (NQC)1

RW Grantees in Washington, DC

Presentation

“Recapture Blitz”

National Quality Center (NQC)2

Recapture “Pilot” at Family & Medical Counseling Services

Objectives:• Recognize barriers to care• Identify customized solutions

Defined by staff Defined by clients Defined resources

National Quality Center (NQC)3

Overview of FMCS Statistics

• 1997 652 clients

• 450 active medical clients (unduplicated/year)• Lost to follow up : 200*

• 2005 864 clients

• 687 active medical clients• Lost to follow up : 122*

• 2007-8 1100 clients unduplicated medical clients Lost to Follow up: 190* *(alive and well)

National Quality Center (NQC)4

Lost to Follow Up Client Identification Process

• Chart review• Utilizing New EMR

Missing numbers on review Missing from staff reports Seen in Outreach Request for Medical records

• Calls from other providers• Hospital admissions

National Quality Center (NQC)5

Lost to Follow-up Contact

Clients Identified as Lost to Follow-Up were contacted via:

• Telephone• Outreach van• Home visits• Letters• More telephone calls

National Quality Center (NQC)6

Patient Reported the Following Reason’s

• “Just stopped coming”• “Problems with a staff member”• “ don’t know”• “Got tired of taking pills”• Relapse• Moved, so clinic too far• Incarcerated

National Quality Center (NQC)7

Reasons Clients Returned

• Incentives Gift cards Food vouchers

• Needed to know we still cared• Readiness for care• Not treated as well in other places

National Quality Center (NQC)8

Target Outreach to Get Clients Back in Care

• Recapture Program Time: 4 months Telephone contacts: 246

• Many duplicate calls or repeat contacts

Outreach contacts: 97 Home visits: 30

• lost adherence team secondary to funding so fewer home visits

• Case Managers/ Outreach team given comp day for 3 clients scheduled and met in med dept.

National Quality Center (NQC)9

Factors for Continued Growth

• 1. Adherence team 2 peer educators

• Follow up phone calls• Abn lab letter• Home visits

• 2. Medical CM /Outreach Adherence Team Follow up phone calls Home visits Incentives for continued service

National Quality Center (NQC)10

Individualized Care Plan

• Optimize Care with Individualized Service Make available : tokens, metro pass Increase medical availability Treat mental health issues Simplify insurance criteria Incentives Close client contact on a daily basis Reduce stigma Develop social resolution strategy/support groups daycare

National Quality Center (NQC)11

Key Factors to Successful Long Term Care

• Individualized care• Face to face contact• Reassurance• Ease of service• Stabilization• Resolution of social barriers

Decrease homelessness Decrease social stigma Decrease co-morbid conditions

National Quality Center (NQC)12

Results After 4 Month Initiative

• 190 Initially lost to care• 116 returned to care at FMCS• 40 in other clinics• 44 still lost

61 % recovery rate 82 % in care 23 % attrition

• Clinic continues to follow initiative protocol though no further funding for intensive work

National Quality Center (NQC)13

• The District of Columbia Department of Health HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis, STD and TB Administration (HAHSTA) has put an increasing focus on Promotion and expansion of testing Linkage to and re-engagement in care Retention in care with improved health outcomes

• The “4Rs” Recruitment/Navigation into care Recapture Retention and Results

National Quality Center (NQC)14

Recapture Blitz 2009

• In 2008 HAHSTA gave sub-grantees a mission to

“Recapture” those lost to care

• Providers competed for MAI funds from HAHSTA to

implement recapture activities

• FMCS developed an effective model that was

identified as best practice

• In 2009 HAHSTA called for a “Recapture Blitz” to

scale-up the model

National Quality Center (NQC)15

Recapture Blitz 2009

• Two thirds of the major HIV public sector

providers in DC participated in the Blitz

• This was a “Cross-Part” initiative, including

providers that are all funded through Ryan

White, but have a mix of A, B, C and D.

National Quality Center (NQC)16

Recapture Blitz 2009: Two phases

1. Identification and prioritization of the client cohort to be recaptured ( August 2009)

a. Compilation of client lists by providers

b. “Matching” against HAHSTA databases

2. Implementation of client contact and re-engagement in care ( September to December 2009)

National Quality Center (NQC)17

Recapture Blitz 2009

Providers compiled client lists using the definition as lost to care meaning out of care for 6 months or more up to 2 years Some providers opted for > 2 years

National Quality Center (NQC)18

Recapture Blitz 2009

HAHSTA performed “Matching” against internal DOH databases using either the most recent lab test or “prescription fill date”

• Determined clients lost to care at a system level • Prioritized which clients could be contacted first

based on time out of care• Clients were matched to the following datasets:

CDC HIV surveillance, ADAP and laboratory databases

National Quality Center (NQC)19

Recapture Blitz: Matching Results

Indicator Number Percent

Total clients submitted to HAHSTA as “lost”

2642 100%

Clients found to be active somewhere within 6 mos

894 34%

Clients found to be active somewhere over 6 mos

961 36%

Clients not found in databases 740 28%

Clients found to be deceased 47 2%

National Quality Center (NQC)20

Recapture: Matching Results

• Of 2642 thought to be lost by providers, 537 or 20% of the clients were seen by a different agency than who declared them lost.

• 20% of clients who providers thought were lost were actually seen somewhere else

National Quality Center (NQC)21

Recapture Blitz: Implementation

Implementation of client contact and re-engagement in care ( Sep – Dec 2009)

• Providers used the revised list provided by HAHSTA to contact clients. They prioritized those active within 6 months, but also began to contact clients in the over 6 month category.

• To date, we have data from 5 providers and are still awaiting results from 3. The 5 providers had a total of 1365 clients lost to care.

National Quality Center (NQC)22

Recapture Blitz: Preliminary Data

Indicator Number Percent

Number of clients providers attempted to contact

982 100%

Number of clients actually contacted

404 41%

Number of clients reported that they were already in care

230 23%

Number of clients who made appointments

186 19%

Number of clients who kept appointments

? ?

National Quality Center (NQC)23

Next steps• Collection and analysis of ongoing and

updated data• Assessment and development of tools

Providers need going forward• Recapture Summer Blitz