national quality center (nqc)1 rw grantees in washington, dc presentation “recapture blitz”
TRANSCRIPT
National Quality Center (NQC)2
Recapture “Pilot” at Family & Medical Counseling Services
Objectives:• Recognize barriers to care• Identify customized solutions
Defined by staff Defined by clients Defined resources
National Quality Center (NQC)3
Overview of FMCS Statistics
• 1997 652 clients
• 450 active medical clients (unduplicated/year)• Lost to follow up : 200*
• 2005 864 clients
• 687 active medical clients• Lost to follow up : 122*
• 2007-8 1100 clients unduplicated medical clients Lost to Follow up: 190* *(alive and well)
National Quality Center (NQC)4
Lost to Follow Up Client Identification Process
• Chart review• Utilizing New EMR
Missing numbers on review Missing from staff reports Seen in Outreach Request for Medical records
• Calls from other providers• Hospital admissions
National Quality Center (NQC)5
Lost to Follow-up Contact
Clients Identified as Lost to Follow-Up were contacted via:
• Telephone• Outreach van• Home visits• Letters• More telephone calls
National Quality Center (NQC)6
Patient Reported the Following Reason’s
• “Just stopped coming”• “Problems with a staff member”• “ don’t know”• “Got tired of taking pills”• Relapse• Moved, so clinic too far• Incarcerated
National Quality Center (NQC)7
Reasons Clients Returned
• Incentives Gift cards Food vouchers
• Needed to know we still cared• Readiness for care• Not treated as well in other places
National Quality Center (NQC)8
Target Outreach to Get Clients Back in Care
• Recapture Program Time: 4 months Telephone contacts: 246
• Many duplicate calls or repeat contacts
Outreach contacts: 97 Home visits: 30
• lost adherence team secondary to funding so fewer home visits
• Case Managers/ Outreach team given comp day for 3 clients scheduled and met in med dept.
National Quality Center (NQC)9
Factors for Continued Growth
• 1. Adherence team 2 peer educators
• Follow up phone calls• Abn lab letter• Home visits
• 2. Medical CM /Outreach Adherence Team Follow up phone calls Home visits Incentives for continued service
National Quality Center (NQC)10
Individualized Care Plan
• Optimize Care with Individualized Service Make available : tokens, metro pass Increase medical availability Treat mental health issues Simplify insurance criteria Incentives Close client contact on a daily basis Reduce stigma Develop social resolution strategy/support groups daycare
National Quality Center (NQC)11
Key Factors to Successful Long Term Care
• Individualized care• Face to face contact• Reassurance• Ease of service• Stabilization• Resolution of social barriers
Decrease homelessness Decrease social stigma Decrease co-morbid conditions
National Quality Center (NQC)12
Results After 4 Month Initiative
• 190 Initially lost to care• 116 returned to care at FMCS• 40 in other clinics• 44 still lost
61 % recovery rate 82 % in care 23 % attrition
• Clinic continues to follow initiative protocol though no further funding for intensive work
National Quality Center (NQC)13
• The District of Columbia Department of Health HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis, STD and TB Administration (HAHSTA) has put an increasing focus on Promotion and expansion of testing Linkage to and re-engagement in care Retention in care with improved health outcomes
• The “4Rs” Recruitment/Navigation into care Recapture Retention and Results
National Quality Center (NQC)14
Recapture Blitz 2009
• In 2008 HAHSTA gave sub-grantees a mission to
“Recapture” those lost to care
• Providers competed for MAI funds from HAHSTA to
implement recapture activities
• FMCS developed an effective model that was
identified as best practice
• In 2009 HAHSTA called for a “Recapture Blitz” to
scale-up the model
National Quality Center (NQC)15
Recapture Blitz 2009
• Two thirds of the major HIV public sector
providers in DC participated in the Blitz
• This was a “Cross-Part” initiative, including
providers that are all funded through Ryan
White, but have a mix of A, B, C and D.
National Quality Center (NQC)16
Recapture Blitz 2009: Two phases
1. Identification and prioritization of the client cohort to be recaptured ( August 2009)
a. Compilation of client lists by providers
b. “Matching” against HAHSTA databases
2. Implementation of client contact and re-engagement in care ( September to December 2009)
National Quality Center (NQC)17
Recapture Blitz 2009
Providers compiled client lists using the definition as lost to care meaning out of care for 6 months or more up to 2 years Some providers opted for > 2 years
National Quality Center (NQC)18
Recapture Blitz 2009
HAHSTA performed “Matching” against internal DOH databases using either the most recent lab test or “prescription fill date”
• Determined clients lost to care at a system level • Prioritized which clients could be contacted first
based on time out of care• Clients were matched to the following datasets:
CDC HIV surveillance, ADAP and laboratory databases
National Quality Center (NQC)19
Recapture Blitz: Matching Results
Indicator Number Percent
Total clients submitted to HAHSTA as “lost”
2642 100%
Clients found to be active somewhere within 6 mos
894 34%
Clients found to be active somewhere over 6 mos
961 36%
Clients not found in databases 740 28%
Clients found to be deceased 47 2%
National Quality Center (NQC)20
Recapture: Matching Results
• Of 2642 thought to be lost by providers, 537 or 20% of the clients were seen by a different agency than who declared them lost.
• 20% of clients who providers thought were lost were actually seen somewhere else
National Quality Center (NQC)21
Recapture Blitz: Implementation
Implementation of client contact and re-engagement in care ( Sep – Dec 2009)
• Providers used the revised list provided by HAHSTA to contact clients. They prioritized those active within 6 months, but also began to contact clients in the over 6 month category.
• To date, we have data from 5 providers and are still awaiting results from 3. The 5 providers had a total of 1365 clients lost to care.
National Quality Center (NQC)22
Recapture Blitz: Preliminary Data
Indicator Number Percent
Number of clients providers attempted to contact
982 100%
Number of clients actually contacted
404 41%
Number of clients reported that they were already in care
230 23%
Number of clients who made appointments
186 19%
Number of clients who kept appointments
? ?