42A11SW82e9 2.4545 TISDALE010

REPORT

ON

A VLF-EM SURVEY

TISDALE NO. 5 CLAIM GROUP

TISDALE TWP.-

PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION

BY

L. M. WILSON

ESSO MINERALS CANADA

120 ADELAIDE ST. W.

TORONTO. ONTARIO

f

RECEIVEDFEB 5

MINING LANDS SECTION

FEBRUARY 1982

INTRODUCTION

PURPOSE OF SURVEY

A VLF-EM survey was carried out on the Tisdale No. 5 group of

claims, Tisdale Township, to assist in defining the bedrock stratigraphy

in the area and to possibly outline potentially gold-bearing bedrock

structures.

LOCATION AND ACCESS

The Tisdale No. 5 claim group is located in the Tisdale Township,

Porcupine Mining Division, and is centered approximately 5 kilometers

northeast of the City of Timmins, northern Ontario. The Tisdale Townshipt o t

is centered at approximately 48 30 N and 81 16.5 W and is indexed under

N.T.S. 42-A/6, 11.

The Tisdale No. 5 claim group is accessible year-round by means of

La Forest Road (base line road) which runs from Hwy. 545 to the

Tiramins airport road.

Regularly scheduled air service is provided by Air Canada to Timmins

Ontario.

PROPERTY

The claims covered In this report are as follows (see enclosed

Claim Map):

TISDALE (GROUP NO. 5)

Claim Number

P. 595755

P. 595756

P. 595757

P. 595758

P. 595759

P. 595760

P. 595761

P. 595762

Description Lot Cone.

111111

1111

11

11

11

6

6

5

5

5

5

6

6

IMP

PREVIOUS WORK

r

TISDALE CLAIM GROUP NO. 5

No previous work has been filed for this group,

GEOLOGY

TISDALE CLAIM GROUP NO. 5

The most recent mapping and compilation of Tisdale Township has

been carried out by Ferguson, 1968 (Geological Report 58 and Map 2075).

Based on this work there is no exposure on this group although it appears

to be underlain by metasediments.

ie. a, m-tir-

Si,....

INTERPRETATIONt

VLF - EM SURVEY

Details concerning equipment, survey procedures and data presentation

are contained in Appendix I to this report. The reader is referred to the

In-phase and Quadrature proifle plots presented on the map for the Tisdale

No. 5 claim group.

i*

The profiles show a number of anomalies, many of which are considered

to be due to culture, i.e., conductive overburden, geological noise,

spurious sources. The general strike direction of these anomalies appears

to be ENE. Two, or possibly three, of the observed anomalies warrant a

more detailed explanation:

Line 16+00 W, Stn. 4+00 S to Line 20+00 W, Stn. 2+25 S

(Clain No. P. 595759).

These are fairly typical profiles, showing a positive in-phase

crossover and a negative quadrature inflection anomaly. The amplitude

response suggests a moderately conductive source. The observed, broad

in-phase anomaly on Lines 17W - 19W suggests, however, that the

conductor is probably due to overburden.

Line 13+00 W, Stn. 4+25 N to Line 17+00 W, Stn. 3+75 N

(Claim No. P. 595756), AAgain we observe a positive in-phase crossover

together with a negative quadrature inflection on several of the survey

lines. The broad in-phase anomaly on Lines 14+00 W - 15+00 W suggest,

however, that this anomaly is due to a moderately conductive overburden

layer.

INTERPRETATION (CONI*D)

- Line 18-K)0 W, Stn. 7+75 N to Line 19 + 00 W,

Stn. 7+50N (Clain No. P595762).

The exact location and strike extent of this conductor

is not known as it occurs on the north edge of the Survey

area and the shape of the in-phase and quadrature profiles

is not fully defined. The positive in-phase crossover

together with a weak, negative quadrature inflection suggest?

a moderately conductive source.

i*

Further work is recommended on the Tisdale No, 5 claim group with the

horizontal loop EM method to test those VLF - EM conductors outlined by the

present survey. There is no bedrock outcrop in the area and the depth of

overburden cover is not known. Two, or possibly, three, of the VLF-EM

anomalies may be due to bedrock sources.

Detailed magnetometer surveying should be carried out at the same

time to assist in interpreting the geological structure in the area.

February 3, 1982

Lloyd M. Wilson, B. A.

Project Geophysicist

Esso Minerals Canada

REFERENCEjy': m

1) Ferguson, S.A., 1968, Geology and Ore Deposits of Tisdale

Township! Ontario Department of Mines,

Geological Report 58 plus Map 2075.

APPENDIX NO. l

VLF-EM METHOD

A. GENERAL PRINCIPLES

The VLF (Very Low Frequency) EM method employs an artificial source of EM waves - a VLF antenna, several hundred feet high, which acts essentially as a vertically grounded wire. A worldwide network of high-power VLF stations established for marine and air navigation act as the sources for the VLF-EM exploration method. At present, suitable transmitters for EM prospecting in North America ace located at Cutler, Maine; Annapolis, Md. and Seattle, Washington. The transmitted frequencies (in the 20 KHz band) are very low frequency (VLF) only by comparison to broadcasting standards, but are in fact very high relative to any other geophysical EM system.

The VLF antenna current is vertical. The main magnetic field component of the primary (transmitted) signal is horizontal and theoretically tangent to circles about the antenna mast. Hence, a transmitting station should be chosen so that its direction is almost parallel to the geological strike in the survey area so as to produce a magnetic field perpendicular to the strike. If a conductor is located in the survey area, eddy currents are established producing a secondary field in the vicinity of the conductor. The VLF-EM-16 equipment measures the vertical components of this secondary field.

The fact that the source is at infinity means the primary field is essentially uniform over the survey area and hence all conductors are energized uniformly. This enables the detection of a broad variety of conductors, ranging from good conductors - graphite, massive sulphides, to poor conductors - muskeg, clay edges, shear zones, contacts ...At times this may be a disadvantage, however, since it may emphasize large-scale, relatively poor conductors at the expense of smaller concentrated bodies. In many environments, the anomalies of interest can be masked by the large amount of geological noise. The penetration of the system is limited by its high frequency in the presence of conductive overburden. However, if the subsurface is resistive, for example, little overburden^ the penetration can be quite deep due to the transmitter being so far removed.

The VLF-EM method is also affected by topographic effects; spurious anomalies being picked up on top of conductive hills because the resultant field tends to follow the slope. The distinction between anomaly conductivity and depth is also often difficult. Another major drawback is that it is not always possible to use a transmitting station which gives a primary horizontal field striking at right angles to the . ~ geologic strikes in the survey area. In this case, two VLF transmitters, at approx. right angles to each other, should be used to provide better coverage.

m

APPENDIX NQ. l PAGE TWO

B. EQUIPMENT

The Geonics EM-16 measures the tilt angle and quadrature components of the resultant (secondary) EM field. The instrument consists of two coils or antennas with axes perpendicular to each other and linked to appropriate electronics.

C. SURVEY PROCEDURE

Readings were taken at 25 meter intervals along lines generally spaced 100 meters apart.using Cutler, Maine as the transmitting station.

The survey technique is listed below:

1. The most probably strike of interest is decided and thetransmitter station more closely along strike, with a detectable signal, is chosen.

2. The proper receiver channel is selected to receive the transmitted signal. This may involve plugging in a circuit module.

3. Direction to transmitter station is determined by rotating the axis of the longer receiver coil in a horizontal plane. The transmitter is located in the direction of minimum field -strength, - i.e., minimum noise from the speaker. With this orientation the axis of the long coil should be pointing more or less in the direction of the transmitter station.

4. Receiver is then oriented with the long coil vertical ancj axis of the small coil at the bottom, the reference coil, oriented perpendicular to the transmitter direction.

5. Tilt angle response is measured by rotating the instrument about a horizontal line which points toward the transmitter, until minimum noise is heard.

6. Quadrature response is measured by rotating the small dial until the best minimum is heard.

7. Facing direction and local terrain is recorded together with the. tilt angle and out of phase measurements.

A complete specification for a V.L.F. reading includes:

1. tilt angle response2. quadrature response3. facing direction4. line azimuth5. transmitter and frequency6. terrain

APPENDIX NO. l PAGE THREE

C. . SURVEY PROCEDURE (CONT'D)

The direction the operator is facing during measurement is very important with the Geonics EM 16 instrument because tilt angles above horizontal are positive and those below are negative. Other conventions exist for recording the tilt angle but only the facing convention is discussed here.

The tilt angle and quadrature responses for the survey reported herein have been plotted at a horizontal scale of 1:2500 and a vertical scale of l cm - 10Z. All readings were taken facing north along the survey line.

l,r

APPENDIX II

NAMES. ADDRESSES AND DUTIES

L. Wilson, 1485 Fieldlight Blvd., Pickering, L1V 2S3 - Project Geophysicist,Operator, Co-ordinator,

(Esso Minerals Canada) Author

G. Do'ucet, 425 Hodder Avenue, Thunder Bay - Operator ' (Esso Minerals Canada)

M. Wong, 86 Wilkinson Dr., Willowdale, M2J 3Z5 - Operator (U. of Waterloo, Student)

D. Heaman, 149 Perry Crescent, Islington, M9A 1K8 - Operator (U. of Waterloo, Student)

D. Cotg, Box 1504, Timmins - linecutter

A. Beaudoin, Box 512, Timmins - linecutter

L. LePine, 473 Spruce St., Timmins - linecutter

J. Mackenzie, 25 Pine St. S., Timmins - linecutter

R. Dionne, 407 Louise, Timmins - linecutter

M. Larivee, 185 Golden East, Timmins - linecutter

E. Hoard, 324 Elam South, Timmins - linecutter

J. Rodrique, 367 Cherry, Timmins - linecutter

D. McLeod, 225 Pine South, Timmins - linecutter

P. Rodrique, 177 Wilson, Timmins - linecutter

L. Valcourt, 88a Mountjoy South, Timmins - linecutter

APPENDIX III

QUALIFICATIONS OF AUTHOR

Lloyd M. Wilson attended Memorial University of Newfoundland

between 1966 and 1971, graduating with a B.A. (Honors) degree in

Mathematics. From May, 1971 to October, 1973, Mr. Wilson worked

full-time in oil and gas exploration for Arooco Canada Petroleum

Co. Ltd. in Calgary, Alberta, specializing in gravity, magnetics and

seismic methods. Since then he has had seven years of experience as

a mineral exploration geophysicist - three with Geoterrex Ltd. in

Ottawa and four with Esso Minerals Canada in Toronto. For the past

two and a half years he has been in charge of project planning,

geophysical field activities and training of student personnel for

Esso Minerals Canada. He is a member of the Society of Exploration

Geophyslcists, the Prospectors and Developers Association, CIMM

(Toronto Branch)'and KEGS.

t l

Rt;;:.;; t/ '.'.ork

l ^\[) p .d.'!!!!!! C e 5

*".

(G-' jp'iysicd'. Geological,

. type of Su'veyls)

l. GROUND VLF-EM (VERY LOW FREQUENCY EM)

IlllllVlli42A11SWe209 2.4545 TISDALE

HM900

Township or Ara*

Tisdale Township M315i fiaim Holder (s)

HOLLINGER ARGUS LTD

- P. O

Prospector's Licence No.

A20822

. Box 320 Timmins, Ont. P4N 7E2, f'u'rwiy Company

Esso Minerals Canada

Data of Survey (from ft to)

ZA ,8,al u. laiiiia.1%Name and Address o1 Author (of Geo-Technical report)

Lloyd M. Wilson c/o Esso Minerals Canada 120 Adelaide St. W

Total Miles of line Cut

42 (67.2 km)innes every iuu

. , Toronto, ONB)

^ .redits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)- - Special Provisions

p" For first survey:

' Enter 40 days. (This i, includes line cutting)

j1 For each additional survey: 1 using the same grid:

,' 'Enter 20 days (for each)

f[ Man Days

Complete reverse side :- and enter total (s) here

S-"*

tv s

f: Airborne Credits

Note: -Special provisions

ij ' credits do not apply ,, to Airborne Surveys.

r

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

VLF-EM- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological '.

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

40

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

-

' expenditures (excludes power stripping)r Type of Work Performed.

l Performed on ClaimU)

Hi -

iil .

:- . 1. .

Calculation 'Of 'Expenditure Days Credits 1 '-' , , ' \ '2 l ~ . \ Total

" Toter^xpenditures i; \' u- } | J | Days Credits

' |lS-*~

j .if, - r|~. InstjuctionsP Tpt|[liDays Credits may b

cbolcec .Enter number ol

[ Dec. 16/81

|^|-15J - | J

e ipport'io/ied at the claim holder's lays ofedjtflplr claim selected \*

f* j/

RecordedyH^ider orApant (Signature)

Mining ClaimPrefix

P. ,:.

, n :i

{ ;; VV-

p-.t-,y

^5fe''.- . '

asili.^^ii * "V*"*''ir'

" --.'.-."jS^-'^'iV"''I**-!V *j*

" ?j

Sr*-"^*-* J

"*f * *^ j^" **

Number

529973 X^V

529974^

529975 ^-VS

529976 ^

529977 ^

529978 ^ ,

529979 " }

529980 "

529981 j

529982 ,/ ;

594781 / /

594782 ^C

594783 ' 5

594784 ^^

594785 ^U

594786 x Jj

594787 ^

594788 ^~

594789 x

594790 S

594791 '

594792 /

'

Expend.Days Cr.

;v#Y7,

jt/.^j

—*#•#91i

i Ei.

O

o

,-

-

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded

K6*?

Date Bacorded .

QJL&C. . f ̂ f 9/Date Approved as Recorded

Mining ClaimPrefix

f.

.:.L

. w,-.

1.

T1 .

i H1

s* ,*^?***.-"4 "

* '7ft-

St^l i.: '.-' 'y

&J

Total clalmi report

t.

.V

it| V:t'i- 1

rf ^"J

aSt•ft iblwM 'i

j

Number

594793 -*

595767 ^

595768 "

595769 -"

595770 ^

595967 ^

595968 ^

595969 x

595970 -?-yS

595755 *s.

595756 - ^

595757 *

595758 . f4

595759 ' )

595760 ' 'V

595761 *

595762 7

t/

?roor?V 1 " ^** V^ 1 V

DEC i 6

AM1-t M-

Expend.Days Cr.

K

V6,

i^var;

-

3Frr^ 1-* lv

Jbl

lumber of minfRFT"" *^^^^!"!

covered by the) 1 VQ II of work. j */ 11

SfMinftfg Rtx^* " s*

Branch BwiHtwi Mining Hecoitfef

r Certification VerifyfrTglteport of Work l

^•-: 1 hereby cenifytftat 1 have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work

or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

, Name end .Postal Address of Pereon Certifying

! Lloyd M. Wilson 1485 Fieldlifcht Blvd., Pickerin]

15, ON L1V 2S3Date Certified lc*nkiiedby (Signature) \

December 10, 1981|^//, __ ( Qrf fm , ^ ^

Ministryof GeotechnicalSeries B-POrt

Approval

File

Mining Lands Comments

o: Geophysics

Commenti

^.*Xv. i tf*^

Q Wish to tee again with correction!

To: Geology - Expenditures

Comment*

r"j Approved f] Wish to tee again with correctionsSignature

To: Geochemistry

Comments

li Approved f~l Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

j JTo: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

S 1693(61/10)

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Your (ile:

1983 01 10Our tile:, 2.4544

Hollinger Argus Limited P.O. Box 320 Timmins, Ontario P4N 7E2

Dear Sir:

RE: Electromagnetic Surveys submitted on Mining Claims P 529976 et al and P 595755 et al in the township '____of''Tisdale; :; ' ;;;;:: ' ;; - ' ;;;; ' ; ' ;; ' ;; ''' ; - '' ;; - ; -

Enclosed are the final pages and maps (in duplicate) for the above mentioned reports. Please sign these and return them to this office.

For further information, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/965-1380.

Yours very truly,

E7F AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

A. Barr:se

Ends:

cc: Mining Recorder Timmins, Ontario

1982 02 24 2.4545

Mining RecorderMinistry o f Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTinmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

We have received reports and naps for a Geophysical (Electro magnetic) survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance ancl Coverage) on mining claims P 595755 et al in the Tovnshlp of Tisdale.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be issued.

Yours very truly,

E,F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450 Queen's Park Toronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316

J. Skura/amc

cc: Hollinger Argus Ltd. Timrolns, Ontario

cc: Esso Minerals Canada Attn: Lloyd M. Wilson Toronto, Ontario

1983 01 31 2.4545

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey on Mining Claims P 595755 et al In the Township of Tisdale

The Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey aseessment work credits as shown on the attached statement have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours very truly.

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

A. Barr:se

Ends:

cc: Hollinger Argus Limited Timmins, Ontario

cc: Esso Minerals Canada Toronto, Ontario Attn: Mr. L.M. Wilson.

cc: Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario

Ministry of Natural

lurces

Technical Assessment Work Credits

FM*

2.4545

Recorded HolderHOLLINGER ARGUS LIMITED

Township or AreaTISDALE

fe-

lS-

yf̂- l1s '

1lf:

|,

b

mfi

L,

P

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical 40

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer ,

Radiometric .

Induced polarization ..,

Section 86 (18)

Geological

Geochemical

Man days D Airborne

Special provision H Ground

days

days

days

days

days

days

days

D

mD Credits have been reduced because of partial

coverage of claims.

D Credits have been reduced because of correctionsto work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claim AsMMd

P 595755 to 62 1nclu*1ve

-

Special credits under section 86 (15a) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims. r

f l l not sufficiently covered by the survey Insufficient technical data f iled

|! The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary In order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 60; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 86(18)-80:

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

16.63.C.100

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—

VLF-EM

Tisdale. TWP.

Hollitveer Areus Ltd.

Esso Resources Canada Ltd.

Llovd M. Wilson

Survey Company ———Author of Report.—™.Address of Author 1485 Fieldlight Blvd., Pickering, Qnt,

Covering Dates of Survey 15 Sept. ~ 3Q Nov. 1983^^—....^(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line Chit 14.4 km cross Ijines———^^.—.^——2.4 ton base/tie lines

1 SPECIAL PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED——— ——ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical —Electromagnetic-O

— Mapnetnrneter _

— Rndhmetrir.,,, ..,....-Othm-

npnlngiral

fipnrhpmiral

DAYS per claim

40

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric

DATE:.

(enter days per claim)

SIGNATURE:.Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol.. . Qualifications ^ ̂ tfO*ffPrevious Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix) (number)

P, 595755

595756

595757

595758

595759

595760

595761

595762

TOTAL CLAIMS.

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations.

Station interval ——

Profile scale —^^Contour interval

473

25 meters

.Number of Readings

.Line spacing —.———

473

100 meters

1 : 2500 Horizontal 1 cm - 105K verticalN.A.

MAGNETICInstrument

Accuracy — Scale constant.

Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours).

Base Station location and value ___

ELECTROMAGNETIC

Instrument ueonics m-4.O u^rj

C.ni] ronfignration

Toil separation

Accuracy

Method: Frequency

Vertical 4 horizontal receiving cotla

Readability ± 17,

Cjj Fixed transmitter d Shoot back Cutler, Maine (17.8 kHz)

(specify V.L.F. station)

with axes perpendicular to eachother .

D In line D Parallel line—————————— i

Parameters measured In-phase S. Quadrature components of secondary vertical field.

g

Instrument.Scale constant.

Corrections made.

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument

V.

Method l l Time Domain

Parameters — On time ——— - Off time -^.— Delay time ———.

— Integration time.

D Frequency Domain _ Frequency ______ Range -————^

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing .

Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument.————————————————————————————————————————. Range. Survey Method —————————————————————————————————————————

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument .——Values measured.Energy windows (levels) ̂ ——^———^^——^^————^——^^—^^————-.-.—-— Height of instrument^——-^——-———-—^^————.—————^Background Count. Size of detector——^——^————^—.—^—.——-———^—..—^^—.^—...,.—..— Overburden -^^——^—-.^——-————^^—-—^———————..—..—.^—..————

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

)THERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey————————————————————————————————— Instrument ——————————————————————————————————Accuracy^^^————^-—————-—————-—^^^-——————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYSType of survey(s) ——— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy^——-—^———————^——

(specify for each type of survey)Aircraft used———————————————————————————————Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Spacing.p Miles flown over total area—-^^————^——^-————————————Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection,————^———

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth————Terrain.^^^——^^—

Drainage Development—^^-^—————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODS

Values expressed in: per cent p. p. m. p. p. b.

D DD

Cu, Pb,

Others—

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory Analysis No.(—————————

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis———.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——-

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory—- Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used^——^—

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

General. General.

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File 16.63.C.100

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION. CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s).'i - ' Township or Area.Claim Holder(s)-—

VLF-EM

Tisdale. Two.'Hollinger Argus Ltd.

Survey Company — Author of Report -

Esso Resources Canada Ltd.Lloyd M. Wilson

Address of Author 1485 Fieldli'ght Blvd., Pickering, Ont.Covering Dates of Survey 15 Sept. ~ 30 Nov. 1981 ,^——

(linecutting to office) .Total Miles of Line Cut 14.4 km cross lines ____;-.———

2.4 km base/tie lines

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical —Electromagnetic.

DAYS per claim

40

—Radiometric-OtherGeological.Geochemical-

AIRBQRNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne turvcyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric

DATE:.

(enter days per claim)

SIGNATURE:.Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix) (number)

P, 595755

595756

595757

595758

595759

595760

595761

595762

TOTAL CLAIMS.

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Readings- '

ONumber of Stations-. Station intervalProfile scale

473 473

25 meters. Line sparing

- , . . 100 meters

l ; 2500 Horizontal l cm ''- IPX verticalContour interval. N.A.

C

(iz;C <S

Instrument.Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours)- Base Station location and value ____

l SO

DLARIZAT;iTIVITY

Instrument Geonics EM-16 (VLF)

Coil configurationflnil separation

A crura ryMethod:Frennpnry

Vertical d horizontal receiving coils

Readability * IX'

CjJ Fixed transmitter D Shoot back Cutler, Maine (17.8 kHz)

with axes perpendicular to eacl. other.

. - :. . . . j " y-Jy ;

din line . v . D Parallel line ; '

\~f * -,— ,-^-- t

Parameters measured In-phase S. Quadrature components of secondary vertical field.

Instrument.Scale constantCorrections made.

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ———^——— Method f~l Time Domain Parameters — On time ——

- Off time ^^.— Delay time.— Integration time.

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

l l Frequency Domain — Frequency ————

. Range ________

Murphy Twpp. (g)"P13555(1355712297 JWI2296 12295

R (P)jP. (P13279 1355879O5 ,|229

529974

13255 10651 63391 6340ER.O |S.CO (P)

129691 I297O j 12972 i 62706268 6267595761 l 595756

l 3953 l 9634 if ..it.595967 1 595968

P. e, P- a13834' 7604577629J5776Za

138265776301 591055

o

P. vhvi P. (p12891 128 Oil5684G7 J53T377

P- ©'P.

14097 14096 4O95 1-3173

p. "li f) P.4035 , 13422

P)IP. 13272 1297B^662I 13195

12979 1311413421 i 13322

1388 (3323 f 3933 13934

P. (g P.

13276 13277I3O64 13315

P. (pJiK. (pj

12797 t3395 o

R IP J l P.

13324 13325 13597 ; 13062 3563 i 13562 I35EI 13179

13197 1316613598 13420 13394. 13393

13161 j 13146

13296 l 133OO 13038 13102 13849. 6263

13039 l 13101 13430 13148

\ )3I22 l 13124 13099 i I31OO [3149 6264

P. ^l P © 13160 l 3?l12966 l \V\13305 .13298 13314 l 13313

© '©tf

P~©flp.13085 \ 13108

P- P- ©

13189 13409 12971 J 13152)377613/306 13297

12

Deloro Twp

(D

42A11SW0209 2.4545 TISDALE200

THE TOWNSHIP OF

TISDALEDISTRICT OF COCHRANE

PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION

SCALE' 1-INCH* 40 CHAINS

LEGENDPATENTED LAND

CROWN LAND SALE

LEASES

LOCATED LAND

LICENSE OF OCCUPATION

MINING RIGHTS ONLY

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

ROADS

IMPROVED ROADSKINGS HIGHWAYS 2 .t/^RAILWAYSPOWER LINES

MARSH OR MUSKEG

MINES

GEODECTIC STATIONSURFACE RIGHTS O NLY PATENTED

or C. S.

Loc.

L.O.

M.R.O

S.R.O.

NOTES

This township lief within the Municipality Of CITY of TIMMINS.

400 Surface rights reservation around all lakes

fa r ivers.

Town boundary of TIMMINS shown

thus i^^v^.^;.^NOW WITHIN THE CITY OF TIMMINS.

OATE Of ISSUE

FEB - i 082

Ministry of Natural Resources _ TORONTO

PLAN NO.-M. 315\ O NTAMO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES:ro AND MAPPING BK

•i T ri 6 \"k

9575

/\ J9 5 7 5\J).& 6J

; 0-1-00 Base L ine

7 IAO

1\S 95 7TB 5

LEGENDVLF-EM SURVEY

INSTRUMENT: IONICS'oneTRANSMIT|TER: CUTLER, MAINE

HORIZONTAL SCALE 1-2500

VERTICAL SCALE ICM-10%

HOLLINGER ARGUS LTD.

ESSO MINERALS CANADA

TISDALE No. 5TISbALE TWP. ONT.

l *A Good Anemotjrf^ r- - A -__ -. .

Scale h 25'00DRAFTED s : M. W*itf ft -W- B- CoufftM