opg’s deep geologic repository bruce site, tiverton ...bruce site, tiverton, ontario site...

34
OPG’S DEEP GEOLOGIC REPOSITORY BRUCE SITE, TIVERTON, ONTARIO SITE CHARACTERISATION PROGRESS CNSC/NRCan Briefing September 10, 2009 Ottawa, Ontario

Upload: others

Post on 21-Mar-2020

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

OPG’S DEEP GEOLOGIC REPOSITORY

BRUCE SITE, TIVERTON, ONTARIO

SITE CHARACTERISATION PROGRESS

CNSC/NRCan Briefing

September 10, 2009

Ottawa, Ontario

• DGR Project Schedule

• Geoscientific Characterisation Planning

• Bruce site Attributes

• Status of Site Characterisation Program 2009

• Summary Interim Observations/Findings

Presentation Outline

2

2005 DGR Project Initiation

2006 Implement Phase I Site Characterisation Plan

2007 Drill Deep Vertical Boreholes DGR-1/2

2-D Seismic Reflection Survey

2008 Implement Phase II Site Characterisation Plan

Drill Deep Vertical Boreholes DGR3/4

Complete Phase I Geosynthesis

2009 Drill Deep Inclined Boreholes DGR5/6

Update Draft Phase II Geosynthesis

2010 Complete Bruce site Geological Field Work

Final Descriptive Geosphere Site Model

Final Bruce site Geosynthesis

2011 Submit Environmental Impact Statement/Safety Report

2012 Public Hearing

Geoscience Program Planning

3

Geoscience Program Planning

4

Bruce site - Geoscience Attributes

● Predictable: horizontally layered, undeformed sedimentary shale and limestone formations of large lateral extent.

● Multiple Natural Barriers: multiple low permeability bedrock formations enclose and overlie the DGR.

● Contaminant Transport Diffusion Dominated: deep groundwater regime is ancient showing no evidence of glacial perturbation or cross-formational flow.

● Seismically Quiet: comparable to stable Canadian Shield setting.

● Natural Resource Potential Low: commercially viable oil and gas reserves not present.

● Shallow Groundwater Resources Isolated: near surface groundwater aquifers isolated.

● Geomechanically Stable: selected DGR limestone formation will provide stable, virtually dry openings.

5

• Multi-year, step-wise investigative program to support Geosynthesis development, the DGR Safety Case and Engineering Design

• Phase 1: 2-D seismic survey, establishment of local seismograph network & shallow bedrock monitoring wells, drilling, coring and testing of two deep vertical boreholes (DGR-1 and DGR-2), initial exploratory laboratory testing program, and groundwater monitoring

• Phase 2A: drilling, coring and testing of two additional deep vertical boreholes (DGR-3 and DGR-4) to triangulate DGR, deep stratigraphy, K & head, expanded laboratory testing program and groundwater monitoring

• Phase 2B: drilling and testing of inclined boreholes to investigate possible sub-vertical structure, laboratory testing and groundwater monitoring.

GSCP Scope: Site Characterisation

6

DGR Project Geoscience – 2009

7

DGR Project Geoscience - Drilling/Rock Coring

8

DGR Drilling - Core Logging/Preservation

9

DGR Project Geoscience – Core Recovery

10

DGR-3 Coring - Intact Queenston Shale 76mm

DGR Series Deep Boreholes – Core Logging

11

DGR Project Geoscience – CSF

12

Formation Strike/Dip: N20°W/0.6°SW

13

DGR Project Geoscience – Marker Beds (1)

DGR Project Geoscience – Marker Beds (2)

14

DGR Marker Bed – Georgian Bay Fossiliferous Hard Bed, DGR-2, DGR-3 & DGR-4

DGR Project Geoscience – Formation Thickness

15

Formation DGR-1/2 DGR-3 DGR-4

Amherstburg to Bass Islands Dolostones 138.9 133.0 132.5

Salina G Unit to B Unit 121.9 117.3 122.4

Salina A2 Unit to A0 Unit 81.4 82.2 83.1

Guelph and Goat Island Dolostones 22.9 23.7 23.5

Gasport to Fossil Hill Dolostones 13.6 12.3 12.4

Cabot Head and Manitoulin 36.7 34.2 34.8

Queenston Shale 70.4 74.4 73.0

Georgian Bay Shale 90.9 88.7 88.7

Blue Mountain Shale 42.7 44.2 45.1

Collinwood Member Shale 7.9 8.7 8.4

Cobourg Limestone 28.6 27.8 27.5

Sherman Fall and Kirkfield Limestones 73.9 74.5 74.0

Coboconk and Gull River Limestones 76.6 75.4 76.0

Shadow Lake Siltstone 5.2 4.5 5.1

All Ordovician Fms 396.1 398.5 397.8

DGR Series Deep Boreholes – Strike/Dip

16

Formation/Marker Bed Strike Dip

Amherstburg Dolostone N16°W 1.15°SW

Bois Blanc Dolostone N27°W 0.95°SW

Salina F Unit Dolostone Marker Bed N32°W 0.98°SW

Salina C Unit Shale N25°W 1.07°SW

Salina A0 Unit Dolostone N19°W 0.63°SW

Cabot Head Shale N19°W 0.53°SW

Queenston Shale N24°W 0.63°SW

Georgian Bay Shale N17°W 0.63°SW

Georgian Bay Fossiliferous Marker Bed N15°W 0.59°SW

Cobourg Limestone N14°W 0.63°SW

Kirkfield Limestone N18°W 0.65°SW

Coboconk Limestone N18°W 0.56°SW

Coboconk Ash Marker Bed N20°W 0.58°SW

Shadow Lake Siltstone N19°W 0.59°SW

DGR Series Deep Boreholes - Stratigraphy 2009

17

DGR Series Deep Boreholes – Hydraulic Testing

18

Instrumentation Deep Boreholes

Westbay Multi-level Casing Installation )

19

Preliminary Results

20

DGR Project Geoscience – 2009

21

2-D Seismic Survey – Results (1)

22

2-D Seismic Survey – Results (2)

23

DGR Site Layout - Drilling

24

• Field geomechanical testing – P & S wave, point load, slake durability

• Lab geomechanical – strength testing (uniaxial, triaxial, shear, tension), swell testing, abrasivity

• Lab mineralogical/geochemical – petrography, XRD/SEM, lithogeochemistry

• Lab petrophysical – porosity/pore sizes, fluid saturations, gas/brine permeability, gas entry pressures, surface areas

• Lab diffusion – pore and effective diffusion coefficients, diffusion porosity using iodide, tritium, radio-iodide tracers

• Lab porewater – major ions, 18O, 2H, 87/86Sr, 13C, gases (Rn, Ar, Ne, He, CH4, pCO2,

13C & 2H of CH4,13C of CO2,

3He/4He) radioisotopes (36Cl, 129I)

Core Testing Program

25

DGR Project Geoscience – Porosities

26

27

DGR1/2 Pore Fluid Chemistry

Dep

th (

m)

27

DGR Project Geoscience – 2009

28

DGR Project Geoscience – 2009

400.00

500.00

600.00

700.00

800.00

900.00

1E-14 1E-13 1E-12 1E-11

De (m2/s)

Dep

th (

m)

TD - HTO - PB

TD - HTO - NB

TD - I - PB

Radiography PB

TD - I - NB PSI

TD - I - NB

Radiography NB

Shale

Limestone

Sandstone

29

DGR Project Geoscience – 2009

30

DGR Project Geoscience – 2009

Property/Parameter

Callovo-

Oxfordian

(Bure)†

Opalinus Clay

(Zurcher

Weinland) †

Opalinus Clay

(Mont Terri)†

aOrdovician Shale

(OPG DGR)*

Ordovician Lmst. –

Cobourg (OPG

DGR)*

Age 158-163

Ma

174 Ma 174 Ma 450 Ma 465 Ma

Present burial depth (centre m) 488 596 275 550 b675

Maximum burial depth (centre m) 850 1650 1350 2550 2675

Over-consolidation ratio 1.5-2 1.5-2.5 2.5-3.5 3-4 3-4

Max. temperature reached during burial (⁰C) 33-88 85 85 c90 c90

Thickness (m) 138 113 160 210 m d37 m

Clay minerals (weight %) 25-55 54 66 25-70 0-20

Physical Porosity (-) 0.14-0.18 0.12 0.16 g0.066 g0.013

Water Loss Porosity

(weight % rel. to dry weight)

8.6 4.0 7.03 g8.0 g2.1

Hydraulic conductivity IIel to bedding

K (m/s)

5E-13-5E-14 2.4E-14 4.0E-14 e2E-14 – 3E-14 e1E-14

Eff. Diffusion Coeff. De (HTO),

normal to bedding (m2/s)

2.6E-11 6.1E-12 1.5E-11 h4.8E-12 -1.4E-12 h7.8E-13

Eff. Diffusion Coeff. De (I),

normal to bedding (m2/s)

1E-12-1E-11 6.5E-13 4.1E-12 h2.6E-12 -4.1E-13 h4.5E-13

Uniaxial Compressive Strength (MPa) 21 30 16 f50 f120

31

• Bedrock geology and formation thicknesses have been predictable and uniform

• Formations below Salina G Unit of excellent RQD with sparsely to very sparsely spaced fractures

• Formation geomechanical properties appear consistent with expectations (Ordovician shales and limestones are massive and competent, Cobourg rocks are strongest)

• Formation hydraulic properties appear consistent with expectations (Devonian dolostones are permeable, Silurian dolostones and shale are tight to permeable,Ordovician shales and limestones are very tight, Cambrian sandstones are permeable,)

• Limited opportunities for groundwater sampling during drilling below Salina F Member shale (Salina A1, Guelph, Cambrian)

Main Observations/Findings (1)

DGR Project Schedule: Geoscience

32

• The Ordovician shales and argillaceous limestones are under-pressured by upwards of 260 mBGS environmental head = very low formation permeability

• Very low Ordovician shale and DGR formation permeabilities and porewater chemistry profiles suggest mass transport dominated by diffusion

• Cambrian sandstone is permeable and over-pressured (~ 10,900 kPa, ~140 mAGS environmental head)

• No significant oil or gas occurrences detected during drilling, but some probable gas-related high pressure zones evident (A0 Salina Unit, mid Georgian Bay).

• Porewater extraction from the low porosity and permeability Ordovician shales and limestones is a challenge

• Secondary infilling minerals: halite in Ordovician shales, anhydrite in Ordovician argillaceous limestones, gypsum in upper Silurian Salina

Main Observations/Findings (2)

33

DGR Project Geoscience – 2009

34