optimal foraging strategies trever, costas and bill “international team of mystery”

21
Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery” Plants Virtuatum computata. • Simulate the movement of insects on a ring of plants with varying quality • Investigate the movement rules that maximize energy intake ZZZZZZ

Upload: reeves

Post on 07-Feb-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”. Plants Virtuatum computata. Z Z Z Z Z Z. Simulate the movement of insects on a ring of plants with varying quality Investigate the movement rules that maximize energy intake. Simulation Code Construction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Optimal Foraging StrategiesTrever, Costas and Bill“International team of mystery”

PlantsVirtuatum computata.

• Simulate the movement of insects on a ring of plants with varying quality• Investigate the movement rules that maximize energy intake

ZZZZZZ

Page 2: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Code Construction

Plant Quality Qi

Ener

gy E

i

Energy Ei

Prob

abili

ty o

f not

mov

ing

PiPi=Ei/(Ei+Eh)Through parameter Eh, the movement behavior of the insects can be changedThe probabilities of moving left or right are Pil and Pir

Page 3: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Code Construction

Plant Quality Qi

Ener

gy E

i

Energy Ei

Prob

abili

ty o

f not

mov

ing

PiPi=Ei/(Ei+Eh)Through parameter Eh, the movement behavior of the insects can be changed

Eh=0.1

Eh=1

Eh=0.0001

Pi=Ei/(Ei+Eh)Through parameter Eh, the movement behavior of the insects can be changedThe probabilities of moving left or right are Pil and Pir

Page 4: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Code Construction

Plant Quality Qi

Ener

gy E

i

Energy Ei

Prob

abili

ty o

f not

mov

ing

PiEh~0 Insects don’t move except when plant quality is extremely low

Eh>1 Insects move continuously regardless of plant quality

Eh=0.1

Eh=1

Eh=0.0001

Page 5: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Case#1-FIXED QUALITY

Plant Position1 200

1

Plan

t Qua

lity

Eh=0.0001 Eh=0. 1 Eh=1 Insects are uniformly distributed among plants at t=0

Page 6: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Case#1-FIXED QUALITY

Plant Position1 200

1

Plan

t Qua

lity

Eh=0.0001 Eh=0. 1 Eh=1

Page 7: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Case#1-FIXED QUALITY

Plant Position1 200

1

Plan

t Qua

lity

Eh

Ave

rage

Ene

rgy

Inta

ke

Optimal strategy is to NOT move unless plant the quality is very bad

Page 8: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Models for FIXED QUALITY Plants

If we consider space as discrete but time as continuous, then movement can be modeled as m coupled ODE’s, where m is number of plants

Equation for a single plant:

EhEEP

i

ii

iiii

iii NPNPNP

dtdN

1

21

21

11

11

where

Since we are interested in equilibrium solutions, we set the system of ODE’s to zero.

Page 9: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Case#1-FIXED QUALITY

Plant Position1 200

1

Plan

t Qua

lity

Eh

Ave

rage

Ene

rgy

Inta

ke

Optimal strategy is to NOT move unless plant the quality is very bad

Model Prediction

Simulation Prediction

Page 10: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Case#2-FIXED QUALITY

Plant Position1 200

1

Plan

t Qua

lity

Eh

Ave

rage

Ene

rgy

Inta

ke

Optimal strategy is to NOT move unless plant the quality is very bad

Model Prediction

Simulation Prediction

Page 11: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Case#3-FIXED QUALITY

Plant Position1 200

1

Plan

t Qua

lity

Eh

Ave

rage

Ene

rgy

Inta

ke

Optimal strategy is to NOT move unless plant the quality is very bad

Model PredictionsFor 100 random

quality distributions

Quality Generated Randomly

Page 12: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

SUMMARY

SCENARIO

1) Plant quality is fixed; Energy intake is density

independent2) Plant quality is fixed; Energy intake is density

dependent3) Plant quality is dynamic; Energy intake is density

independent

CONCLUSION

1) Optimal strategy: DON’T MOVE unless plant the quality is very bad

2) ?

3) ?

Page 13: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Case#1-FIXED QUALITY

Plant Position1 200

1

Plan

t Qua

lity

Energy Intake rate is density dependent

irN

i

ii e

EhEEP

NiDen

sity

Dep

ende

nce

Density Dependence

Page 14: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Case#1-FIXED QUALITY

Plant Position1 200

1

Plan

t Qua

lity

Eh

Ave

rage

Ene

rgy

Inta

ke

Optimal strategy is to NOT move unless plant the quality is very bad

r=0

r=0.01

r=0.02

Energy Intake rate is density dependent

Page 15: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

SUMMARY

SCENARIO

1) Plant quality is fixed; Energy intake is density

independent2) Plant quality is fixed; Energy intake is density

dependent3) Plant quality is dynamic; Energy intake is density

independent

CONCLUSION

1) Optimal strategy: DON’T MOVE unless plant the quality is very bad

2) Optimal strategy: DON’T MOVE unless plant the quality is very bad

3) ?

Page 16: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Case#1-DYNAMIC QUALITY

Plant Position1 200

1

Plan

t Qua

lity

Insects are uniformly distributed among plants at t=0

Quality Update:At every iteration the simulation encounters standardized constant growth and consumption of the plant by the present insects.

INITIAL QUALITY

Page 17: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Case#1-DYNAMIC QUALITY

Plant Position1 200

1

Plan

t Qua

lity

Eh=0.0001 Eh=0. 1 Eh=1 Insects are uniformly distributed among plants at t=0

INITIAL QUALITY

Page 18: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Case#1-DYNAMIC QUALITY

Plant Position1 200

1

Plan

t Qua

lity

Eh=0.0001 Eh=0. 1 Eh=1

Quality Plot

INITIAL QUALITY

Quality Plot Quality Plot

Page 19: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Simulation Case#1-DYNAMIC QUALITY

Plant Position1 200

1

Plan

t Qua

lity

Eh

Ave

rage

Ene

rgy

Inta

ke

Simulation Results

Optimal strategy is INTERMEDIATE between no movement and continuous movement

Page 20: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

SUMMARY

SCENARIO

1) Plant quality is fixed; Energy intake is density

independent2) Plant quality is fixed; Energy intake is density

dependent3) Plant quality is dynamic; Energy intake is density

independent

CONCLUSION

1) Optimal strategy: DON’T MOVE unless plant the quality is very bad

2) Optimal strategy: DON’T MOVE unless plant the quality is very bad

3) Optimal strategy: INTERMEDIATE between not moving and continuous movement

Page 21: Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery”

Optimal Foraging StrategiesTrever, Costas and Bill“International team of mystery”

“Oh, Behave…”