oregon department of forestry 1 working in the urbanizing landscape: changing roles for natural...
TRANSCRIPT
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
1
Working in the Urbanizing Landscape: Changing Roles for Natural Resource Professionals
Oregon Department of Forestry“Stewardship in Forestry”
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Presentation Outline• What is the forested area we are
concerned about?–Residential Emphasis forest–Low-density residential– Wildland-urban interface
• Description of the interface• Why do we care about this area?• Challenges and Opportunities
Working in the Urbanizing Landscape, May 23-24, 2011 - Beaverton, OR
Multiple-use emphasis forests Mostly state, tribal, some family, some federal
Wood production emphasis forests Mostly forest industry, some state, tribal, family
Residential value emphasis
forests
Wildland urban interface,
rural residential zones,
urban and community
forests
Social BenefitsEc
onom
ic B
enefi
tsSustainability
Environmental Benefits
Nature emphasis forests– Parks, wilderness, wild areas Mostly federal lands, some state, tribal and private
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Fragmentation & Conversion
• All states confronting an increase in land conversion as – Globalization and rising social costs erode
forestry profitability
• Alternative land values on the rise– Risk to “green infrastructure” needed to attract
new industries; maintain quality of life – Risk to rural economies, family-wage jobs
Non-Forest Profitability is Attractive
Real Estate versus Timber Value
1.50
2.75
1.75
6.50
3.75
1.75
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
Western Oregon NortheastOregon
NortheastWashington
Idaho Minnesota Louisiana
Region
Mu
ltip
le (
Re
tail/
Tim
be
r)
Source: Forest Capital P artners, LLC
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Fragmentation & Conversion
• Compared to other states, Oregon is currently well-positioned to protect its forestland base
• However, Oregon is seeing an increase in the number of dwellings in wildland forests
• And shift from wildland forests to residential forests
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Oregon’s Private Forests
• 10.7 million acres– 4.7 million acres of nonindustrial or family
forests– 6.0 million acres of industrial / investment
forests
• Significant economic impact– Total economic output of $22 billion in Oregon;
11% of goods and services (2007)– Forest products sector pays higher than the state
average
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Oregon’s Private Forests• An estimated 330 thousand acres of Oregon
forest - about 5 percent of private forestland - exist inside urban growth boundaries or other development zones.
• Another 1.8 million acres of private forest exist within one mile of developable areas.
• The remainder extends out from the wildland-urban interface to the more rural areas.
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Oregon’s Private Forests
• Approximately 3% of family forestland occurs within Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB) and 34% in Wildlan-Urban Interface (WUI)
• Approximately 9% of Industrial / Investment forests occurs withinWUI
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Why Do We Care about these Urbanizing Areas?• Board of Forestry Objectives • Potentail loss of forest benefits• Changes the way the surrounding
landscape is managed• Affects surrounding economies and
supporting industries• Risks and cost of Fire protection
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Board of Forestry2011 Forestry Program for Oregon (FPFO)
• Goal C: Protect and improve the productive capacity of Oregon's forests– Key challenge: Maintaining the Forest Land
Base
New forces are reshaping Oregon’s forests in ways more significant than any wildfire, windstorm, or disease outbreak.
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
2011 FPFO: Maintaining the Forest Land Base• Fueled by factors including
development pressures, population growth, …, and changes in the forest products and real estate markets, forestland is being threatened by conversion to non-forest uses.
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Current Board of Forestry Private Forests Policy Objective• Identify current and future risks of
forest fragmentation and the conversion of forests to non-forest use as the primary, overarching challenge to sustainable forestry and keeping working forests working.
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
2011 FPFO: Loss of Benefits
• Fragmentation and parcelization of forests, combined with the development of roads and residences, can degrade the green infrastructure of a forested watershed, including clean water, diversity of fish and wildlife species, and the quality of forests habitats
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Forest Mixed Use Agriculture Range Urban
Per
cen
tag
e o
f m
on
ito
red
str
eam
sit
es Excellent(90-100)
Good(85-89)
Fair(80-84)
Poor(60-79)
Very Poor(10-59)
n=6n=10n=17 n=31n=69
Measurements on land in all ownerships in Oregon, by DEQ land use class, 2005
Statewide Water Quality Conditions
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
2011 FPFO: Changes Management
• dramatically changes the way the surrounding landscape is managed, limiting the range of traditional forestry practices
• the notion of producing a timber value from the lands … is no longer acceptable to new nearby residents or landowners
Building Density and Pre-commercial Thinning by Private Forest Owners
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 91 98 105
112
119
126
Building Density Per Square Mile
Pro
babi
lity
of P
re-
com
mer
cial
Thi
nnin
g
NIPF
FI
Notes: Based on relationship found by probit regression. Example is a forest stand; basal area=65; site index=70; slope=30.
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
2011 FPFO: Affects Communities• When formerly productive timberlands are
converted to non-forest uses, surrounding economies and supporting industries are often affected because forest products-related businesses are no longer viable.
• Harvest taxes are no longer available to support local government services and education.
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
2011 FPFO: Fire Protection
• The presence of development in forested areas changes makes wildfire management more difficult - placing homes at risk, making firefighting more complicated, and increasing firefighting costs.
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
• Likelihood of human-caused fires increases with dwelling density –Sisters Unit: Compared to sections w/ no
dwellings fires increased: • 1-5 = 2.6 times,• 6-10 = 5 times,• 21-40 = 21 times, • 40+ = 71 times
• Large fires that threaten dwellings are 48.3% more expensive to fight
Wildland Urban Interface:Fire Issues
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Challenges and Opportunities• Most complex and challenging area• Contains all four types of forests: nature,
residential, multiple use, and wood production
• Dominated by family forestland (3% in UGB; 34% in WUI); contains industrial / investment forest (9 % in WUI).
• Highest risk of land use conversion (highest ratio of real estate to timber values)
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Urban and Urban Interface Forests Key Objectives
• Active involvement in local and state land use planning
• Support forest products market and ecosystem service market development
• Assist local governments in compliance with statewide land use goals by providing technical assistance
• Support transferable development rights program• Monitor changes in the public and private
forestland bases and levels of forestland impacted by land use conflicts.
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Urban and Urban Interface Forests Current Efforts
• Constrained by resources• Significant workload
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Stewardship Forestry in UGB and WUI
• Notifications: 1 % in UGB; 31 % in WUI
• Forestland: NIPF: 3% in UGB; 34% in WUIIndustrial: 9 % in WUI
Non-Industrial Private Forest
Industrial Private Forest Total
2007UGB
Notifications 217 9 226Notification Acres 2,913 167 3,080Total Acres 120,269 3,538 123,807
Urban InterfaceNotifications 3,885 1,513 5,398Notification Acres 173,404 96,211 269,616Total Acres 1,575,960 534,419 2,110,379
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Oregon’s Family Forestland• Occupy a unique landscape position, contribute
diversification to forest cover and local economies, and provide political and cultural connections with urban populations
• Are smaller, and their objectives and land uses are varied
• In general, occupies ecologically important, lower elevation settings, often near residential areas
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Family Forestlands
• Diverse objectives, concerns, and plans • Top reasons for ownership include:
– Aesthetics, Family legacy, Privacy, Land investment, Part of home, farm or ranch
• Top concerns include:– High property taxes, Keeping land intact for
heirs, Trespassing or poaching, Fire, Insects or plant diseases
Ore
gon
Dep
artm
ent o
f For
estr
y
Family Forestlands Key Objectives:
• Provide one-on-one technical assistance, deliver incentives, support Oregon plan, and administer the Forest Practices Act
• Support certification / management plans for family forestlands and conduct audits
• Develop easement program for protecting working forests