7/28/2019 Organization Change at Aaple

1/1

Organisational changes in Apple, Inc.

Appleallows business and leadership restructuring by gaining access to extra distribution channels and sales outlets in t

global market. Recognizing and applying processes for direct investments, exploiting research and development for innovatio

creating good heights of organization responsibility and through effective change adaptation ,Appleaudits provision of Supplier Co

of Conduct (, 2009) DoAppleInc. readily and successfully change?, influential theories have assumed that organization is relativ

malleable, able to adapt when circumstances change (, and , 1993); and 's (1984), depicted inflexible organizations in which change

difficult and hazardous, distinguishing among changes as adaptive or disruptive forAppleand distinguishing conditions that facilita

impede change ( and , 1991; , 1992). Apples change process can be disruptive and adaptive, and Applebased inertia can increa

likelihood of organizational change.

The literature on organizational change has focused on the content of changes: switch to more advantageous configuration

defined as adaptive, while switch to less advantageous configuration is defined as deleterious,Applemay strongly resist chan

theories focus on linkages between the organization and the environment: Resistance to change occurs because organization

embedded in institutional and technical structure of Apple environment. Thus, Apple focus on factors internal to the organization, ho

change is opposed by management team, even when change is advocated by some Apple members, established roles and formal ru

are difficult to alter quickly. and 's (1984) structural theory offers model of process of organizational change that include internal a

external constraints on organizational change, probability of organizational change as organizations exist because they perform w

reliability and accountability for certain actions. Reliability and accountability are high when Apple goals are institutionalized a

patterns of organizational activity are routinized, but institutionalization and routinization generate strong pressures agai

organizational change.

In addition, the attempt to broaden and expand structural inertia model in network ofAppleinteractions to incorporate theor

of organizational learning and innovation, result is broader model of change and momentum at Apple. Research themes or issu

common to Apple change efforts will be discussed in lieu to content issues focus onsubstance of contemporary Apple chang

contextualissues, focus on forces or conditions existing in Apples external and internal environments, the process issues, whi

address actions undertaken duringthe enactment of Apples intended change, criterion issues,which deal with outcomes common

assessed in Apple change efforts. Research dealing with monitoring affective and behavioral reactions to change will be reviewed w

literature base.

General observations and suggestions for future research will beoffered, Apples organizational change literature continues

be responsive to the dynamics of contemporary strategic demands. The level of analysis refers to entities which Apple change po

concepts and society, knowing roles ofApples information technology in change, structures can be seen in current theorizing increas

awareness of strategic options, open discussion of Apple advantages and disadvantages, characterization of theoreti

statements. Presence ofimproved interconnection and accessible databases are often the basis for deriving strateg

advantage atAppleupon finding potential change model applications. The need to realize and discover Apples current busine

changes implying such strategy bases, howAppleInc. is handling business environment and its management, learn about Appl

organization assumptions and issues affecting change in the organization. People related change, work based change models

example,Appleeexecutives feed deliberate information into one part so that leak can be traced back to its source, workers on sensiti

projects have to pass through layers of security once at their desks or benches, they are monitored by cameras and they must cover

devices with black cloaks and turn on red warning lights when they are uncovered (, 2009).