oslo: open standards for linked organizations
TRANSCRIPT
OSLO: Open Standards for Linked OrganizationsLaurens De Vocht, Raf Buijle, Dieter De Paepe, Ruben Verborgh and Erik Mannens Mathias Van Compernolle, Peter Mechant, Ziggy Vanlishout and Björn De Vidts
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMSIMEC - IDLAB (FORMER IMINDS - MULTIMEDIA LAB)
2
1. Introduction2. Political Context3. Semantic Interoperability4. Discussion5. Conclusions
3
1. Introduction2. Political Context3. Semantic Interoperability4. Discussion5. Conclusions
How canlocal and regional governments in Flanders (i) managethe structure and description (ii) of the data they publish (iii) so it leads toreusable data exchange (iv) ?
OSLO(i) political support and adoption(ii) semantic agreement(iii) once-only principle(iv) interoperability
OSLO: Background
Started February 2012, ended 2015
Result of public-private partnership initiated by V-ICT-OR
(non-profit Flemish ICT Organization)
Supported by wider community: local, regional and federal administrations
Brought in-line with ISA, EU initiative for interoperability (between EU
Member countries and regions)
OSLO: A Program
OSLO Program
Political Support and Adoption
Semantic Agreement
Once-onlyPrinciple Interoperability
OSLO Program: Supporting Common Interfaces
Citizens
Businesses
OtherGovernments
FederalGovernment
RegionalGovernment
LocalGovernment
OSLOProgram
Search for (linked) public or governmental data
Commoninterfaces
European Interoperability Framework (EIF)
Legal Interoperability
Organizational Interoperability
Semantic Interoperability
Technological Interoperability
Political Context
PromoteInteroperability
Citizens and businesses provide information only-once
Facilitate aggregation of information from different e-government
information systems and existing services to create new ones
Enable machine-readable reusable public service descriptions
OSLO Program: Goals
11
1. Introduction2. Political Context3. Semantic Interoperability4. Discussion5. Conclusions
Governmental Levels in Belgium (simplified model)
12
Bottom-up and Top-down
13
The local governments ‘promoters’ of OSLO created the necessary support at the local level
co-funded the initiativeinitial sponsors: Flemish ICT service providers; major cities and Informatie Vlaanderen
The promoters created a coalition of willing administrations at various government levels.
Working together with the ISA Program to get a more stable outcome fits in/corresponds to EU-level governancemore authoritative standards as result
14
1. Introduction2. Political Context3. Semantic Interoperability4. Discussion5. Conclusions
Contact Information: People and Organizations
Public Services
Localization
Focus on Thematic Domains
Domain Modeling: Process Overview
Semantic Agreement
Domains Entities + Relations + Attributes
Steering committee
Working groups
per domain
reporting
validation formalization
feedback
Semantic Agreement on Structure and Descriptions
Semantic Agreement on Structure and Descriptions
People
Memberships
Localisation
Public Services
Businesses and Organizations
Semantic Agreement on Structure and Descriptions
Maximal Reuse of Existing Vocabularies
Core Public Service Vocabulary
OSLO Vocabulary Regorg
OrgVCARD Ontology
Core Location Vocabulary
FOAFVocabulary
Terms/MetadataVocabulary
Formalization and Implementation
21
Result Where to find?
Specifications and Developer Documentation
http://purl.org/oslo
Knowledge Base(in Dutch, incl. policy and governance guidance)
https://www.v-ict-or.be/kenniscentrum/projectfiches/OSLO/OSLO-2
Mapping Guidelines https://github.com/v-ict-or/oslo-mapping-guidelines
RDF and XML serializations https://github.com/v-ict-or/oslo_xml_schemas
Namespace purl.org/oslo/ns/localgov#
22
1. Introduction2. Political Context3. Semantic Interoperability4. Discussion5. Conclusions
Pilot Projects
The ‘Shared catalog for local public administrations’ pilot [DeVocht2014] is a pilot on
contact information related to products and services disclosure between governments
and towards citizens.
The ‘Local Council Decisions as Linked Data’ [Buyle2016] demonstrates a method to
create a new (distributed) base registry for public mandates of local governments. .
23
[DeVocht2014] De Vocht, L., Van Compernolle, M., Dimou, A., Colpaert, P., Verborgh, R., Mannens, E., Mechant, P., Van de Walle, R. 2014. Converging on semantics to ensure local government data reuse. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Semantics for Smarter Cities. CEUR-WS. 1280. 47–52.[Buyle2016] Buyle, R., Colpaert, P., Van Compernolle, M., Mechant, P., Volders, V., Verborgh, R., Mannens, E. 2016. Local Council Decisions as Linked Data: a proof of concept. In Proceedings of the 15th International Semantic Web Conference: Posters and Demos. CEUR-WS. 1690. Paper 71.
Characteristics
24
Result Where to find?
Ownership Interest group of public servants active as IT practitioner at local government level organized as non-profit organization (V-ICT-OR).
Vocabulary Alignment Alignment with EU initiatives such as ISA and general Web recommendations by W3C
Adoption Public tenders on local levelEmbedding in policy on regional level
Adaptation Focus on commonalities rather than differences
Governance Self steering approach with one chair/facilitatorBusiness owners as invited experts
Findings
OSLO enforces the principle: ‘first clarify and then digitize’.
often there is a lack of political support to cope with this principle.
Bottom-up and top-down approach created the necessary political support.
OSLO was built on consensus, rather than on a legal framework.
unique situation where different government levels worked towards this consensus
could stimulate future uptakes of core data models by other administrations
Characteristics (prev. slide) could change to stimulate adoption at local and regional level:
the transfer of governance and lifecycle management of the program would be better at the higher level;
embedded in within a governmental public body or policy domain with power to ‘force’ the uptake instead of
in a non-profit organization that relies more on voluntary participation of municipalities.
25
26
1. Introduction2. Political Context3. Semantic Interoperability4. Discussion5. Conclusions
Conclusions OSLO Program covers political support and semantic agreement for e-government in Flanders: involving both public administrations and private partners on people, organizations, localization and public servicesincreased awarenessISA-based-methodology led to semantic convergence
Bottom-up organized working groups delivered a reusable formal specification
serialization of domain specific models.
The semantic process of OSLO showed/demonstrated that both ‘Political support’ and ‘Semantic Agreements’ are essential step stones to soften the existing information silosto make a shift to an open, interoperable and citizen-centric government.
27
Laurens De VochtE [email protected]
@laurens_d_v
Raf Buijle1, Laurens De Vocht1, Mathias Van Compernolle2, Dieter De Paepe1, Ruben Verborgh1,Ziggy Vanlishout3, Björn De Vidts3, Peter Mechant2 and Erik Mannens1
1 {firstname.lastname}@ugent.be2 {firstname.lastname}@ugent.be
3 {firstname.lastname}@kb.vlaanderen.be