overview on etox – a project in the framework of …axlr8.eu/workshops/steger-hartmann.pdfencoding...
TRANSCRIPT
Overview on eTox – A Project in the Framework of Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI)Dr. Thomas Steger-Hartmann, Bayer HealthCare
page 2 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
Changes in Technology – From “Forecast“ to Prediction
page 3 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
Why should there be in vivo toxicity prediction?
Benefit of early in silico prediction:
� Improved selection/exclusion of candidate compounds, lowering attrition in later phases
� Qualification of impurities or metabolites whithout additional in vivo studies (3Rs)
� Safety assessment of chemicals in the context of REACH without additional in vivo studies (3Rs)
� Development of a more targeted in-vivo testing strategy
� Better predict human toxicities and/or safe starting doses
page 4 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
In vivo Toxicity Prediction – Gaps
� Data from public domain sources on toxicity is often biased towards
toxic effects (negative tox data is usually not published)
� The data quality of tox reports in the public domain can hardly be
assessed and is often questionable
� The chemical space of published tox data is dominated by industrial
or household chemicals (pharmaceuticals are underrepresented)
� Prediction is mostly directed to pure a chemistry approach -
integration of pharmacodynamic/toxicodynamic and DMPK data
lacking
page 5 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
How Can We Get Better?
The tremendous wealth of high
quality toxicology data in the
archives of the pharmaceutical
companies is not yet leveraged!
High Quality
Pharmacology
Broad chemical spaceICH conform
Different species
Multipleendpoints
Buried in toxicology archives
High QualityTox Data
Repository
page 6 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
What is IMI - Innovative Medicines Initiative
Who? European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations
(EFPIA) + European Community founded a Public-Private Partnership for pre-
competitive collaboration: Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI). It represents a
Joint Technology Initiative within the EU’s 7th framework
Objective? To adress the key “bottlenecks” in the biomedical R&D process in
Europe, i.e. to accelerate discovery and develop more effective innovative
medicines with fewer side-effects.
How much? Budget of 2 billion € over 5 years (framework program 7)
2 Billion EURO
960 Mio. Euro 960 Mio. Euro
page 7 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
Translational
MedicineClinical
development
Pharmaco
vigilance
Predictive
pharmacology
Predictive
toxicology
Identification
of biomarkersPatient
recruitment
Validation of
biomarkers
Benefit/Risk
assessment
with regulatory
authorities
Research in 2 key areas
Underpinning themes
Drug development process
Areas of bottlenecks
Discovery
Research
Preclinical
development
Efficacy
Safety
Knowledge Management
Education & Training
eTox project
The four IMI pillars
page 8 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
eTox: Project Plan and Deliverables
� Data sharing: Exploit legacy preclinical reports from the
pharmaceutical industry to link chemical features to pathology findings.
� Establishment of a toxicological database with high quality in vivo and
in vitro data. This repository will form the basis of prediction model
development.
� Construction of integrated prediction models for target organ toxicity.
� Validation of new prediction models: the validation experience will be
shared between companies and with regulators.
page 9 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
Participating EFPIA Partners
Novartis Pharma AG (Francois Pognan)
AstraZeneca AB
Bayer HealthCare
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Laboratorios del Dr Esteve, S.A.
GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development LTD
Janssen Pharmaceutica NV
H. Lundbeck A/S
Pfizer Limited
F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG
Servier
Sanofi-Aventis
UCB Pharma SA
page 10 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
Contributions of EFPIA Partners
� Provision of high quality data (mostly GLP) from sy stemic toxicity studies (different species), DMPK studies, safety pharmacology studies and pharmacophore investigatio ns (ligand binding)
� Data extraction from legacy reports (done in-house or with external help)
� Expertise in the field of QSAR, pharmacophore modelling and ontologies
� Contacts to regulatory authorities (including interfacing reg. databases)
� Profound toxicological expertise
page 11 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
An Estimate for the Treasure
Additional envisaged data points / endpoints:
• Safety Pharmacology (in vitro including MDS or CEREP screen)
• Safety Pharmacology (Core battery)
• Toxicokinetic data (exposure!)
• DMPK data
• Further species (Cynomolgus)
• Gene expression data
• …
page 12 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
Participating Public Partners
Fundació IMIM (Ferran Sanz, Carlos Diaz, Eva Molero)
Fundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas Carlos III
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Liverpool John Moores University
Technical University of Denmark
Universität Wien
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VUA)
Inte:Ligand GmbH
Lhasa Limited
Molecular Networks GmbH
Chemotargets SL
Lead Molecular Design S.L.
page 13 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
Contributions of Public Partners
� Expertise in bioinformatics
� Expertise in database development and hosting (honest broker
concept)
� Expertise in the development of QSAR models and Expert
systems
� Expertise in DMPK modelling (CYP, transporters)
� Expertise in validation of predictive models
page 14 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
SoftwareDevelop-ment &validation FIMIM
CNIO
EMBL
LJMU
DTU
UVIE
VUA
IL
LL
MN
CT
LMD
In silico
pharmacology
& toxicologyDatabases
Bioinformatics(including ontologies & text mining)
DMPK-relatedtoxicology
Molecularapproaches
FIMIM
CNIO
EMBL
LJMU
DTU
UNIVIE
VUA
IL
LL
MN
CT
Transporters
LMD
In silico
pharmacology
& toxicology
Expertise of the Public Partners
page 15 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
eTOX – The Workflow
QSAR and Expert Systems for in silico Toxicity Prediction
2. Data sharing andcreation of data base
3. Building the models
N
4b. Validation with new structures
4a. Testing alerts
5. Refinement (new structuresor limited early toxicity studies)
New Report
N
OH
OH
N
O
N
OH
Chemical structure & descriptors
Bibliography
Public databases
Pharma reports
1. Data collection
page 16 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
page 17 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
� Classification of data: confidential (majority), non-confidential
(structure and EPAR in the public domain)
� Data transfer to “honest broker” bound by legal framework
� Encoding of sensitive structural information by honest broker
(“descriptors”)
� Provision of IT infrastructure to prevent loss and illegal down-load
of sensitive data
Overcoming the hurdles – safe data sharing and IP protection
page 18 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
� Joint database will be managed by a “neutral trusted institution”
(=honest broker).
� Bilateral non-disclosure agreements signed between each pharma
company and the trusted institution.
� The chemical/biological records of single compounds classified as
sensitive will never be disclosed to any pharma company or academic
partners different from the owner.
� The use of the joint database by the developers of models and expert
systems will be done by accessing the joint DB in the trusted
institution without capability of downloading it or accessing to single
records.
Component 1: The Honest Broker
page 19 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
Databasecontains toxicologicaldata and descriptors (encodedstructural information)
Novartis Bayer GSK AZ J&J Roche ….
Novartis Bayer GSK AZ J&J Roche …
Ow
ned
only
by E
FP
IAco
mpa
ny
Fre
e ac
ces
by a
ll pa
rtic
ipan
ts
Established and curated
by honest broker(O
wnder of database source codes)
.…
Databases contain pharm-tox data and structures - background
Publicpartners
Component 2: Selected Accessibility
Derive modelsand build tools
Physical Access BarrierEncoding
Non-Encoded
Database containsfull information –
foreground with data
EFPIApartners
page 20 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
� Start of project: January 2011
� Duration: 5 years
� Budget:EFPIA: 7.9 Mio. €IMI-JU funding: 4.7 Mio. €Total costs: 13.9 Mio. €
� Data base schema developed
� Ontology development started
� CROs for data extraction identified
� Public data sources identified
eTox Project Status (05/11)
page 21 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
Project achievements
� Creation of a complex framework of legal statutes and IT-technical provisions to overcome the hurdles of sharing proprietary data of EFPIA companies.
� Development of a first version of a toxicity ontology for seamless data gathering, integration and exploitation.
� Design and successful testing of strategies for the masking of sensitive structural information of compounds.
� Design and setup of the first version of the eTOX central database.
� Compilation and assessment of public data sources.
� Agreement on the (modular) architecture of the eTOX predictive system.
� Analysis and benchmarking of current models for toxicity prediction, and definition of quality criteria for method selection and development.
� Development of an innovative multi-scale modelling strategy for the prediction of cardiotoxicity (J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011; 51:483-92)
page 22 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
� Interfaces to –omics databases (e.g. Innomed, FDA
liver tox etc.): Identification of mechanisms and
safety biomarkers
� Interface to Clinical and Pharmacovigilance
databases (the ultimate goal is to predict proband’s
or patient’s safety)
eTox and Beyond – The Vision
page 23 • Overview eTox • 23. May 2011
More information at…
…www.e -tox.net
Thank you for your attention!