paul wood, conceptual art, 2002 tate

80

Upload: manray-hsu

Post on 03-Dec-2014

125 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate
Page 2: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

'lllllrlI rllrlrilrlflflll' t-98t-/€ts8-t N€sl

Page 3: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

i :': : ': tti

" j

Page 4: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

eNtHSnsnd r-LV]

a00M rnvd

ruv lvnrdlcN0c

ruv Nur00l l Nr srNilEAol^l

Page 5: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

Cover:

Keith Arnatt

Sef'Burial (leln s on

Intnfrenre Pmjr)

r969

(detail of fig.29)

Frontispiere:

Vctor Burgin

Possession 1976

(detail of fig.54)

rsrx r 85437 385 4

A catalogue record

for this book is

available from the

British Library

Published by order

of Tlte tustees

byTate Publishing,

a division of Tate

Enterprises Ltd

Millbank, London

swlP 4RG

tL/ I ete 2002

All righ* reserved.

PaulWood has

asserted his motal

right to be

identified as the

author of this work

Cover designed by

Slatter-Anderson,

London.

Book designed by

IsambardThomas.

Printed in Hong

Kong by South Sea

International

Press Ltd.

Measurements

afe glven ln

centimetres,

height before width,

followed by inches

in brackets.

For Peter and Knin

Page 6: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

08

8L

LL

VL

slrPar)

xaPuI

Surpra; raqunC

lcvoll lHI

9

No[vlNls]udru oNv scrfl]od

s

vrol svruv

,

olwnsru ilsrouvc-rirv vI

sr^uitldsuld oNv sNorrroNocrud

z

ruv ]vnrdlcNoc eNrHcvouddv

I

stueluo)

Page 7: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

AppnoncH rNG Gorcrpruru AnrAs befits an art of the mind,'Conceptual art'poses problems right from thestart.What was it?When was it? (Is it still around or is it'history'?)Where wasir ? Who made it ? (Are we to consider

'X' a Conceptual artist or not?) And of

course, the umbrella-question: whyl Why produce a form of visual artpremised on undercutting the two principal characteristics of art as it has comedown to us inWestern culture, namely the production of objects to look at,and the act of contemplative looking itself (fig.r)?

This is not just a rhetorical device with which to open a book on the subject.These are real questions. It is not at all clear where the boundaries of'Conceptual

art' are to be drawn, which artists and which works to include.Looked at in one way, Conceptual art gets to be like Lewis Carroll's Cheshirecat, dissolvin g away until nothing is left but a grin: a handful of works madeover a few short years by a small number of artists, the most important ofwhom soon went on to do other things. Then again, regarded under a differentaspect, Conceptual art can seem like nothing less than the hinge around whichthe past turned into the present: the modernist past of painting as the fine art,the canon from C6zanne to Rothko, versus the postmodernist present wherecontemporary exhibition spaces are full of anything and everlthing, fromsharks to photographs, piles of rubbish to multi-screen videos - full, it seems,of everything except modernist painting.

Moreover, Conceptual artt legacy is exceptionally argumentative. Most ofthe major players are still living, and matters of status and priority are jealously

guarded. In the mid-r99os, members and ex-members of the English group Art& Language conducted a war of words in print about the history of their

6

Page 8: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

uerfrsnu pue Jatrur aqr lq paloydrua tsJU uaag aleq ol tno suJnt,tre tdaruo3,asuqd aqt tng '.rry pnrdaruo3 go pu.rno{ aq1,'Surptaq-gns ?qt re^or

slr uo parntealaSan?uuT-lty letrpouad rl{t Jo rnssl tsry llt '596rur osyy'696r

ur rtrv pnrdaruo3 uo saru?tuas, slq lyruonbasqns put L96r w,uv I€ntderuo3uo sqder8rrrd, srq paqsrTqnd rrr,4&a'I IoS lsnre ueruaruv *lI'usIIErIpEr

prnrlod put IrJnllnr Sursearlur Jo arerurll E uI 'Jrtlto oqt uo ruslurapotrAl

Jo uortntrtsul aqr qrl^{ pu€q auo aqt uo sarrtrerd,l€ruJo;-ItrrE, snoIJEA

PUE lrE lEurrurtr I Jo uorsrllof, aq] ruoS lno-ll€J Jo Pull E :solll^Iltre PasEg-ssarord pur -lqdr.rSoroqd '-a8en8url go 'fiar.re,r € ot rgar ot arurt llt tE prsn

Surag '6ua;rnr Flrrotsrq perl turet aqa'sol,6r pur so96r rtEI aqt ur p?qsrrnog

leqr arrtre;d apreS-tuerre Jo tuJo; I€ruolsrq e ot JaJaJ ot,trr yrntdaruo3,asuqd aqt pasn trpea4e a^rq I'rualgo.rd e;o Surqtaruos sluasard arueu llt ua^E

srlirvN

'l.rorsrq rre Jo r)grpr ll) otur

pare^al ag leru r.re pnrdaruo3 Jo tunol€ paqsru5 {1n3 e tpg,u uror3 lurodu€eparurrlrrv ?qt patetrol stq loog luasa.rd eqt t€qt arunsse ot oll€u rg plno^r

tr s^rara Surtsr.rtuor qlns Jo DEJ rqt uI'suortntrtsur IrJntlnJ go anbrlrD e seruarrtrr:d,tsrpntdaruor, rlgrsugrp lluo agr 'qogtrng.rog lasald pursnpur-lsod

'pua8eueu str ur usryelrd€f, uJatsal\Jo saJn]rnJls aq1 SuuoJnu se 'sr l€ql',uorteJtsrurupE

Jo rrlaqlsar rrt, urql ssal Sunpou ag ot sJauortrrrerd Surpeals,t.re yentdaruo) Jo auos ts€al lE Jo ryo,n arll pa8pnl rloglng unue(uag 'tred

srq roJ 'ltrrtrrltrtu€ rnq Sunltlur a.rr aruapuadrpur rrtaqtsar pur lrrurapour

Fnos qtr^r tuarua8r8ua ue 'ulg roC'aruepuedapur prrtur s,tr€ Jo spuno.r8?qt Jo uort€liluJo;-ar f.lrssarau r sE tnq ',bru.rapour

Irrf,os qtr,&{ luarua8r8ua-ar E Jo atueu aqt ur saldnuud tsrurapour qtr.tl >learg e se ]ou'dno.r8 a8en8uel

E ]rV llt Jo >lro.{r arlt ll.relnrrued'ue pnrdaruo3 spreSa.r uosrrreH srlrerl3uer.rotsrg pu€ frtrr) eq1'ra.uod u€frJeruv Jo sarntfnJls Japr.tr eqr ot tuar]J

tr1a?rc1aq or plaq Jlrstr 'usrurrpour

Jo sloroto.rd Suruguor pur rrterf,ntarnqoqt Jo aeg >le?rq ot 'stsrtJ€ uetrrJarsv uD€-I put uauro,r lg rsray tou 'suoga

Jo las r papruoJqtr podso.rta.r sp.reddrl'snsuosuof e JoJo llor.rers po8raura a,rer1

Irrlt tre pnrdaruo3 Jo stunorr€ I€rrrotsrq eqr'sarndsrp qlns ol uortrppe uI'lrraJa^r oq,u suerJotsnl Jo s.&arlJrao aartetrJoqrne llpasoddns lll Jou 'eJ-aql

arJ^r oq.{{ asorll Jo sarJoruaur aqt Jeqlrau palsnJl aqs ltl{f 6urlu^r 'aJuetJodrxr

slr urrldxa or dn panonb ̂rou oq.&{ asoql uo rrq8rr ra.l tas Jlasrrrl p.reddll 'aprs

;o(eur e uo palernr ag or ue8ag uE I€nldaruo),lerJrotsl{, uar1.u 'so55r agtur 'r?rBI gen141 'pauaddeg llpntre t€q.&r Jo,lpo.red, e u€qt arour ?ptrl ul patlnsar

ter{t ,tllJ€J peq Jo )te ,we ' ,,{tetfrgr€, pue ,8ursn;uor, st,tr lunof,f,E s p.reddrl

'Jauqrog rog 'pouad atlt 7o awze7eru l.re Surpealatlt'uwofily 3o sa8ed arp uruoltturuapuol qru€rg pue toor e qr;'t 'sn^xts

looq ntqu zL6r or 996r uro;;

l.rr Fntdatuo] ur sluaudolalap anSoprer or tduranr spreddrl ,{tnltyt:.arp paroar8 rrurllog Iatr I rsrrr€ u€)rraruv arlt'f L6r se fy.rea sy'uouaurouaqd

^rau r tou sr stt1t puv 'sur8uo s,tuaur? oru aqt ur alor srq 8ur'frspg

Jo wtqpesn:o€ peq qolqrng raUE serq pue drqsuesn.red jo rlo1llng urureluagutlrotsry eqt pasnll€ qtnso) qdaso{ tsrtrt arlt 'uouaurouaqd

ItrrrotsnlE s€ tr€ FntdlluoJ la.Lrns ot uortrgrqxa ro(rur ts.rg illt 'suEd ur noprduro6

artual at4tte prydatuol ua.I ot:nSoptrr 696r arp u1 'sol,6r-pnu aqt ur sartrlrtrr

Page 9: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

Henry Flynt as e:irly as 196r in the conrext of activit ies associated wjth theFluxus grorrp in NewYork.In an essay subsequer.rtlv published ir.r the FluxtrsAnthologl1961'), Flynt wrote that "'Concept Art" is first of all an art of whichthe material is "colrcepts"', going on to mrke the point that, 'since "conce;rts"

are closely bound up with lalrguage, concept art is a kind of l l t of rolrich ther.naterial is lar.rguage'. Yet, as central a figrrre as Lucy Lippard has commentedflatly that Flynts Fluxus-inspired sense of'Concept Art'had l jtr lc ro clo wirhwhat she understood as the key activities of tlre Conceptrral art r':rngrrar.l inNewYork in the mid- to late-r96os:

'few of the artists with whorn I ir',rs

involved knew about it, and in any case it was a different kird of "cr,trcc1-. .The point here is rol that a discussion of antecedents should be exclu.{,:.1 tion.ra study of Concel'tual art, brrt that, in wriring histories of :rrt, ne h;u.' r,r L'cwary of making plausible-soun.ling art historical connections rhar mar harchad less impact on the actual makino of art ac rhc trmc rh-rLr rctr.. 'L.ccrrvcgenealogists would l ike.

It is with srrch issues in mincl that we have to be aware of a thircl rerm rharhas cone into increasing currency. The term is

'conceptu:i l isn'. and ir has rnore

than one inllection. On the or.re hand, rhere is a use of this word f:rvour.t'.1 L'r'

1Jos€ph Kosuth

ldea ) [Meaning] 196T

119.4 x 119.4t,47 x 47)The lveni Col ection,

Page 10: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

2

PnrconomoNs nno PrnsPEcnvEsThe relationship between Conceptual art and modernism is a fraught issue.

What we can say with some certainty is that modernism in the dominant formit had come to take in the Anglo-American world at least, that is to say astheorised by the critic Clement Greenberg and frequently dignified with acapital

'IVl, went into deep, arguably terminal, crisis in the late r96os. This was a

spectacular fall. But it was not the first. The modern movement underwent anearlier crisis, from which it recovered, and from which modernism in the so-called

'Greenberqian sense emerged to become dominant. We need to establish

a view of this M/modernism, tf,. b.m.. to comprehend Conceptual arttchallenge to it. In doing so, we also need to encounter early modernismt'other':the historical avant-garde (a distinction I owe to the German historian PeterBrlrger).

FonnEarly modernism was transcultural and transhistorical in its sweep.TheBloomsbury critics Clive Bell and Roger Fry famously isolated the essentialfeature of art as'form':'significant form'for Bell,'expressive form'for Fry. ForBell and Fry and others, modern art as it had been established by Ctzanneheldout the promise of escaping from the weight of academic tradition through thisemphasis on pictorial form.This, it was clairned, could affect the emotions ofthe sensitive spectator in away comparable to the effects of sound in music; thatis, independently of what the forms may happen to depict. It is easy to see howthis kind of thinking coincided with practical moves towards a fully abstract

2fhzimir Malevich

Black Square 1915

Oil on canvas80 x 80 (31% x 31%)Tretyakov Gallery,Moscow

Page 11: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

slualgord tlrl]Blp l rnuatod Poo,!\ Ptre a.rl,4t to 'PrtoqPrEtr 'Ieraru Jo Dafqo

uE sPrur PErl re^eoq { .ro urltBf rruIIPE]A'osstlld olq€d sruo 'reqr s€.'l'l uDIgoJo

ar{I'txaluof, IJE lle :lxaluol u3rle u3 olw asn Jo lxaluotr rrulou llaql ulog

ruaqt tueldsu"rt ot pur 's8uqr u€rrerrpn dreulpro s€ lng'srafqo ue st aptur

uaaq lltu€uo rou peg regr sna(qo aler or urBag druegrnq't16r se lyrta sy

.DSrN0C

',sapeulpra.r, arp :r:e pudaruo3 go s.rossarapard arp st passeawrllapur uaaq arurs aatq uoDsanb ut sryo r aqf Jlalr uortlt$sqe go erurS::ur:

aqt quu dlsnoawrlmurs 'p:lg8rlq8rq llarnre durerpng larwyq ra.p rualqord

Jo PuDI sqr $ rI T€1 sfaluoP € or Perr qsnrq t dg aPPuI d tnDt ,3uEuIEd,tl€rsge uE ra^o plrll 3wre,u olur rnur e 3uryul jo a1o[ lsrprc3-lurae

l1.rea aql arua11 'uoodue1;o3 adu ruarsls t ,{1:ta1c oslt s ,,huorpne prlrrrtruo lu:puadap uarsls y ')ulJf,

uE aqt dlpslurod arour ro 'lsrtJE

aql Jo PJo,4{ 3rp 01 u,4{oP alu€tr srqlr.rrue:d u; aos op or sle1 rrlJlpJl-l^r:o -,llrplol ruaqlset, ue ',luoruwrl

IEIUTOJr r s.tntnsuor srnolor PUEsadals 3o uonern8guor :tprrued

e ;aqraq,u &s or lrrroqtnr 3ql

serl oql6'a)uolsrx? slr lnoq8norgl]ft Derrsq€ Paruneq a^€q

:eq: sra8uep'sr;8uep urErrrJ l r.pr,,lr

P3ur€r '.r3^3^1oq 'luoPaaS sql

'llB uo sluransuotr I€uoIlIPE:Il ruogruoPaag lwlrurotruotr r Pu€

'atruassa

Jruourd.roy q:.rcas e.1o elodsuon-rer.rsqy paroldxa pw pJreJoqeJJ

'padola,rap aq uaqr uer grrq,r'a8en8uey ,neu e ur p:o,,!l tsrg ar{t rll

Surqlaruos se spwls uanbg yqg a,qt'leu srp ur papr8aa 'stuauoduror

3olas lre.nsqe dla.rnua ue ruog Suuurtd

e dn Supynq ;o rnq 'p1;o,u aqr ;o e8eurr ue urog a.rnDrd e u.aop Suqeo:q

3o rou '6{rqlssqd 3ql or dr:I e,meurStur ue sE paquf,s?p aq lluo uEt 'slsrlrc

qtog roJ rpaAoIIoJ t"ql!\.pFo.{1 3prs]no alqe .rrsqo uE 01 aruaJajal Jo uroqs 'u€

rcurrsqe /1ry e;o 6{lglnod aqt qs{gets. ot se { la^e^torl'3uop a^€q or uaas saop

tr rtqlA e;rl ]lns puE alnlrct;od ':derspuel se rpns sa:ua8 ur paroo; rls rnq'frrpar ruorg larrr.rrsqE, lr€ ur ur Sunlnsar 'JEJ os luo^{ l1uo srslpur pnsr.r 3ossaro:d srqt lng's8unultd:taqt uro.r; p]ro,,!r aqt Jo samt€a; alqesruSorar &,tt

rr.nsgr ot un8:g ptg'ir /tr6r noqe ytun zr /t6r punote t qt { sratunolua tsJUruog 'pur rusrqn3 lg aptru Suruado aqr uo pazFs peq u€upuotrAl pue qtrr,ralEtl

qtog '(z BU) 516r raqurarag ur pe.rSoaadw pairqrgxa tlobbs {rrlg s,qtrl^.J€Ii\l

nursE) sE,& 'olsajrrreur fnsr^ Jo PuDJ r al{ 'tJ€ tJErlsge Jo p1:o,,[ aqr uado

p?.ltpap a^€q ot sruaas 'ttradsortar w'teqt )ro,,!r aql',trrsnul pnsu, t ayl.roltr*dseql uo Sunre pue 'saruEal a^ndlDsap Jo a^nrrreu Jo .p.gr.rnd, tre ue lur

Page 12: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

:uose irbout its identitl'.There was no precedent for such a thing being regardedas a r.vork of :rrt. With benefit of hindsight, it is easy to see here how a crucialslippage can occur betweer.r t 'stablishrng the i,, lenriq: of ron,ethrng a' a work of

, r r t . , ccord ing to 11 . Po. :c rs rur t . r i - , rnessential formal guality', and the vellopposite of that: treating it as artnot because of its ineluctably rightformal 'essence'

to which we allassent, but bcc:ruse of contingcntcontextual factors, such as beir-rgdisplayed in an art exhil, i t ion orproduct'd bv someone uIon w'homthe idcntit l '

'artisr' hrs :r]rc;r.{r, been

confcrrc.l. I)rrcharnl'-s 6rst'Unassiste

d Rc;r.i ma.lc rr as a urct:rlbottlerack (l ig.3,'. Dcspit. ' his clairnthat the sclectiorr rvls arbitrarr,, onccannot bllt; lssulnc hc choscsomcthing lust.los.' cntrugh to th.'krn.l ' of rhinqs th.rr *.rt bc!' innrn,'to !'1Ilcrgc .ls sctr11.tt113l

aonstrLlatrons. to lcl l l l force tht-

issrre of l hat * ls 1n,.1 lvasn't art, of

rr ' l rcrc thc rcalrn of the:resthetic

cn.lc. l an.l * here Lrt i l io began.

Thc rcal rausr r l l l t ceme a few

\'.itrs l:rtcr n ith L)uchamp'-s Io,,ta,r

.f ic.+1. Th" .to.), i. well knou,n.Drrcharnp, with his identity as a\';urgLr:uLl artist well established, wason rhe st-le ction comnittee for anol-.cn sculptrire exhibitior.r in New\brk. He bought a urinal from a

l l u r , l ' . r s . l r " p a n d . t ' h n r i t t c d i t r . rscrrlpture, crudely signed with the

1 ' . , ' r J o n l r n ' R . M u t t . I I r " w , ' r k u a '

rejected bv the jLrrv despite thesrr;'posecl oper.ness of the exhil,itionto ar.r1,one who had paid their lrcarid was not exhibired. Duchanpproceeded to run rings round thcjtrdgcs' published reasons fbr

excluding the udnal: that it was somehow 'immoral', that it u,as'merel)/

plunbing, and so or.r.Thc point was m:rde even more seriouslv funny bl tht-actually very close formal resemblance between the urinal:rnd ConstantrnBranctsi'.s organicallv shapecl abstract sculptures, some of whicb hacl alrcadvbeen exhibitecl in rhe United States.

3MafcelDuchamp

Batuerack 1914,repl ica 1964

MetalEditon of e ght rep caseach 64.2 (2sr)h ghMarceiDuchamp

Schwarz Edillons, M lan

4Marcel Duchamp

rep ica 1964

38 x 48 x61( 1 5 x 1 9 x 2 4 )Tate

5Jean-L6on G66me

0 Pti Cien 7902

0i on canvas8 7 x 6 6 ( 3 4 % x 2 6 )

Page 13: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

pasr€r salof pu€ sund 'ryo.u s drueqrnq u1 '(5'3y) p le ,l:e, se urq lq paararuorrou ssrpqnop se,4{ aug:ag uo91-uea{ :arured rruapery-qlt aqr lq e8t p1o

srq ur patJnrtsuol u8rs-doqs Suruund aga'etr.rtdas ppoar sts:r:d q3n1 alp req,n:eqt:3ot sar.ro;: dueqrnq 'srurpourruor l:eurpro 3o e8uer y q8no.rqr,rre w

Ienruros aqt, PaIIe] A>lsurPuE) lErl,r Jo uoDEurlr€luol srq sE I]4,4{ s€ oPuanuur

Fnxas stq qlly]oo; lyoq .ro .raas lrruorsr,r ;o a1o.r pa;rdsur lpruururoXar1: ;o stsr:re lq uoudrunsse aqt *.u rusru:aporu l1:ta 3o sarttsodwod

er.p 3o au6 '8urys pu€ xas Jo sgreg aqr qrr^{ rolpne rusnr€ eqr Jo pue uoutl aql

Jo senuouos orlt qJrnsp p asaql'(,a;rl s,trql 'soro, "r,x

,l Jsa,:'so-r.r) l,rrya5 aso;X'o8r :atp apua; u,no sq JoJ p3uro) ,r{ srutu l{t pue l/.u1,ro1,! poq)Elsnur

^{ou prrt atsrrp-aJuo aqr Suruonder (,sse *r1e lo? s,ar1s,1w nv ynutp v,ll, alrT spunos pnol rno pea.r 3r qrrqar) DOOH1, arll snql'sund (1rypearp

:o) :aaap ssey.ro arour Jo sarrrs € ritl,lr 3uq:a3 :ygrgaur 3o plro^{ aqt traJurol sr,u sar8atrrs s drueqrnq

Jo auo '.Fsro^run, arou.r 'lErnlru

aroru 'sPro?[ uEq] ffu.urEPuryaJoulr{oqauos se P3^ratruol

eJ? Jell€I 3s3rl urJJerI,4{'uouorua pue 8urle:;: 3o araqds

ole,llrd e spre,tol 'aarte:.rtu pue

a8tnSwl pe.ra.1s yo uqte.r cqqnde ruog leare 1rt u.rn1 o1 u:;q

Prq uoBnlo^al s ursru.raPour Jolftd 'laa; ot paag Suraq aro;aq&o:lp lq p:uor:rsod '1eads o:

os 'sr :otet:ads ag1!l€ Jo >l.to,t!

pue roreDads _,1io :arunorua

Fuonoul? arlt Jo surJalaql Suules 'aue:;

3o puDI e JotErlt sr tJE uJapou ot ?Stn8uel

;o drqsuonela.r aqt ;r st sr lr'p:aua8 u1 'sa,lpsruaqr s:8e1or

pue s8unured agr ur woddedpuanba.r; sp.ro,u'usrqn3

u1 'uon*.nsgr ;o d.roarp

arp uo dysnordor :lo.r.n p llsurpur; lyss€lqpu€ u€upuotr^{ tald 'rltrl,laletr l

;rurrse;1 a8rn8uey lq p.tun€ri sr rusrulopou 'asuas Jaqlout ut lng 'pasltuor:d

:.re uorloura pw SurTaaJ 'prats str uI 'p:Sundxe sl 'J€uo[ua^uo] aqt pu€

IeuoDer Jr.lt Jo suonetouuof, sl qlu{ 'a8en8ury qrrq,,rl ruo:; ureruop e ol dn ppr

,auo1t lq8tsa,{a or, qeadde teg: lre ue 3o 'alol^L sJnutr lsru.rapour ralrl sr 1o ,ala

luatrouulr aql Jo suoloN 'uonlauuof srlt s.rJ^es usruJaPoy{ 'sa^Dtl.I€u Fltlqtq

ptrt prrsseyr lylueururopa.rd go sru.rar pnsr,l ur Suuunora: aql uo 'JJntelJtrJ

pw rrr 3o &nurxo;d :ql uo pa.uuer se,,lr pue 'pasuoaqr dlq8rg uaaq ptl1ur rrurapery 'a8tnStrel go ue pa8:nd p€rl usrufapou 'l?^sl auo tV 'snounJ srr:e u.repou ol aSen8uel Jo uonElar aqll:e 3o anbrlln t w aStnSuel pasn oqr

?rl tnq 'Fuun E pue I3^or{s,,lrous € 'p€rallog t glr,u srurod srq apwr dureqrnq

t0v00Nrl

Page 14: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

serjolrs qr.stiol-ls about * hcre rhc bound;uics ol- art lar'.C)tht-r.rr 'aLrt-glt l ists conLinuccl t,r pJ.r\ rhc .r rl..r l \I.r11,, ,rr m'r.lcln aLr

L.cc:irne srrlf icirntly csLaLrlishc.l;rn.1 sLrlJicienth (selfl,) inrl-ort,rnt to wilrr. lr ir rts, , i , . ,

or,vn rrrnning conunentlr\ ' f to1)r withir-r r ]re r:rrrks. Thus thc f) ' ic l ; i ist I l r :rncrs

Picrbi:r pl lvr. l r ' i t l r t l r . notion o1-l:rngulgt an.l vjsrral art as. l ist irct btrt rel:r te. lrepresent:rt ioni l l s\ 'stcnrs lvhcn hc 1.r-,r . l rrccd r pirnt ing m:1dc uf: i lDrost cnLircltof sign:iLLrlcs i f i -g.(r ' t . l -att ' r , thc Srrlrcal ist I{crt1 Magrirrc m.r. l t a l ;r l l t .rchinq

l,oint l l toLrr r iso: i l . tn. l vcrLral t-c;r-cscntrt ior. abouf repr-escnr:rt ion lncl rcl l i t r ' ,l l i r l r his paint ing o1- a pipe c.rpt ionccl C,i i u tst yds ttn pipt , ' . 'This is lor r I '11'. 'Sirr i l : i rh, in his paint ing of a hrr, , l rnirr,rr t l icre:rp;rclrs, insre. i . l o1- thcrcllecrion o1-l hrrrr.rn lro,,lr ' , thccqLriralf nt l inglrisric l\hris.,f rJrjl:t,tntt t Lt,,-: . \ lrno rr rrh rhcL);rt lr isrs;ur.l Srrrrt.rl ists. rl l .cit in a.l i1l, 'r 'c n t r ' ,. in. the Soviet(lorstructi l ists .lror. LhfoLLgh acr it iclLrc o1- thc ,icsrhcticrlh'nutot-tomous rvork of alt an.l th.'lbrn of l i f i that Lurdd \vrot. ir.\\I i th t l icir rotion of Art inrcrPlocluction. thel' lbjrrre.l :rrt .rs : isvnrLrtor]r of bolrrgcois societl th;rtha,.1 to bc r. 'pllcc.1 b,, 1'mcticrlcorltribLltions to thc clr] lstrl lctio olsocialisrr. l-hjs crit iquc of botugroirin.l i l i t iul ism rnirn.rtcd thc x\':rntgar.le in l:: isr lrt l \Vcst:rl ikc, . lcsf itcr l r . d d c l r r ! l r j u l l l . L . u r a L . r r \ \ l r i . l .Dldarsts, Srrn,.. l l isrs u.lClonstrucriyists l irun.l thcrnsr-lvc.s.

H rsroRYIn rhe crl lr ' . lccl. les o1- rhc nlcnti,..thccDtLlr\ ' thcn, rrrodc tisnt ]t:r. lbccornc csL.rblisht.l i i i th rhcechie\ .cnrtnt of l t r l l t l ( ) l t ( ) l t l ( ) t rs ,

fLrl lr :rL,str'.rct .rrt, brrr bcirirrJ rlrcr lpf irrcnf: iut lrori t l ln. l sclf lstrfhcrt 'no lnrke.l ,r conccptual i lsrrLri l i rr ' , lhiclr

t l re ct i t ica] al ir l r-qi lrJes inrnrc. l iutcl ' , highl ightc.J. M.rr\ 'of t l rc r-ecrrr-r,r .nt

th.-mr's ol-Lhc c:rr-] t i r l l r) t-g. lrde. snch .rs thc rJ,. .r t i tr of t l r t- rvolk o1-;rf t , rh.

lr l r t ionship of : l t lncl I lngrnge, thc r. . l ;rr ionshrI ot rrr ro :r r lrr lJ o1:

conrrro. l t t pro,. lucLion sct rgrinst rn i . leologl Lrl : in.1cpcr. l , . .rct-.ru. l sfr ir . i tn:r]

l rhr( ' . i rnd u,h,rt i t rvrs thlt t l rr . :rr t ist , lal . can r l l bc sccn ro prt l igLrrc l l t r .r( ionccpttr.r l rr t . \ \ 'hi t is fcrhrps mosr srrr.pr. ising is the rrpiLl irr t , i r l r r 'hich rhc

options w.r '( ' f i l lo\r ' . ' .1 rhrougb. Ll l thc Firsr \ \ i r lLl \ \ ' rr ' , r .r ' i th rbstr ' :rct rr r ,rr thc

onc hlnJ ;rnJ the |t ' l r1\n.r. le on thc orhcr. t i tc cclrrct pru,r l I i rr j ts ol l .oth

csscntiel isrD a J contexrui l isDr ] t l . l : r l re.r. l t bccn skctchr. l . t \ f i . rv rt-ars l : i rcr,

. r l i c l t h c B o l s h o i k l l c n r l r r t i L r n . r h r - { , . , , r , , , , . , ' r ' ' , . i r c r r - r 1 1 . c r i n q . r r r . r ' s u c h .

Page 15: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

'os f,uoP r?,{ rou Pcrl tr 'rusr^!rnPo:rcl Prnr

JpEurlpt.l aql JrdsJC ltnuJlod sr II! drl Prsn J^trl ot rs.lu Ptriluslul3Poru'p.r8uaJItr[] (Jr, fr]ool )q or JpEru sr rit ltrir '.{ltrurtu)

,uorrrpuor Flprorur.rd,slr prlpr prul IJeq)rtr^l trq^\ J,\rq ot 'prprs;odns ,{1t:r8oy Jq or.:rrpro ur Jr sn sr

r1 p:qsl-r8uuxr :o ;,JrEurproqns rJLpn l:ar sopreS-rut,re oqr :yrq.,t 'rruoroa8:q

lrlurEutJJ urslulJPoru 'Jlotl,{{ Jql uo lng 'Glsl,\llllulr^uoJ Put ruslltJlllls

tpr:q;o s:p.rcF-ru€,\r Ierurrl Jqt -]o.deL1s aqr ur 'rronclorut stt uro:3 ln:u.rt,r',sr:Llto, str pcq rusru.rrpoul snououolry Jl.)sl Jo Put ur rFpr ytrrlt:: t stg

rrt rurpua.lapur oe 'drgs:orer:rp pur rusr.:sr:g go do:pytq r rsurcFy Juuu.rro.Jl:otr:dnutur: ut prlrtrl: ursruJJpoul '::nt:unlteqt tr::srcp.r1r1 oor:sanb

lno -rr,rsur Jeru rr11'lrr: Lr.rrpour -]o Jfnrerd orp:o; pr:pur s:rt1c{ ayrtsorlfta,r .lur:r:q ,uorsot^l puE urpJ[J

.L )r,'\ nr5.(J1r'Jr.)ur.rd .rlt rs

PJlrun Jqr Pur (uoPLro-l lurlx:)nssJI r ol 'sr.rt,1,i11tdrrutrcl) aclo:nE

p:rdnr:oun - p::ur,rpt so!6r:qrsr orrds Surluur-1s r: ul pJtrllpuolfl111rq sr'n rJ.\oJlour 'JtpqJl' JLI

'prsrpr.rq,{q :rr1,,u:ulos illeuorserro'suuoj J-rnd rr.rlit ur struulrLrIos

'rusr1ta11 1elro5 pue usrp:e8

tut,4.t rulsrurJPolu Jo suortrlo

rqr lc1 puclnSul:l]] urrq r^tLIOI SLUJJ\ I.If U IJI\r'Lrr JO JJIlJPIJ

rLll'por.IJd srq: :noqSno:q1 uo

1:eq p,1rrp SuntrB ur pJ.\rrn\ prL)onb snlt1s rql 'rz f16r; 1o :;ntclnr

rLll J.Ut lng'!t6I Iuurl PJ^losJltou sE,,!l. teqt srsr.rf r :626r ur urtSr:

srsr:: p.rSuoyord orur oE o1d1uo'soz6r Jrlt ur pJsrTrqetsiJ sE,{r tr6r

ol llede IIg reql ,\lllluJl qlLIJ.liuluJrl l urorj pJluJrlur ru''l.{st.rlerrJc.r

aq1'u:.1dr:q rou prp rusrTerlos

IeuoueurJtul rJPro PFod,,!{JLr t ur Jnssr tou prp ftntu.rr qDrtua,nt,{Fta IP

-1o srsu: pruqod:qt 'tno pJurnt tr sV'uouentrs IEluotsrq str lc1 p:qro"-urnr.urf,Je Jtrru Juo luE tE lrr ol alqepr,rr s8urutrur tr]qlssod Jo e8uel Jqt pur '.rnrerd

Foos € rr€J ru sr lI uoDrrgru8rs;o uarsls ru:po:do;rur ue ll.r.!u rou sr r.rEttqt uouru8olJr E s.^lo^ur lJ,^rsu! aqlisol,6r :qr ur pul: 996r puoo.rr:1o ptarsut

'so?6r aql ul ro '816r punorr Jsur l.rt puda:uo3 pa3p.H dlpjl t t,osaop lq,lr',{1:r: os p:qsqqels:;raar rusrp;r8 tue^e pu? ursrul.poru;o s:1od rqt;1 q8uol

os r>pl lrc pntda:uoJ prp lq.,r'puorrs ir^r^rns usrurf,pollr prp / oq 'ts.rrl'ruo

Surn8ulur ue sr tr 'u:as tsnl J^ELI a,,!\ rrq,\{ ua^rB 'oslE tng Ja.l{sut or :lqrssodun'uor1s:nbllpsr srlr la^a[ auotV urrlt 31astr stduro;d uous:nb rlcpop y

'tuJurour Jl:llrolsrq aurrs

?ql l€ uonllrrtsap ol pJtsat put pJLIslJqttsa qroq'T:ads ot os's?^r u]slu];potrA]

qtrfqu Pl'!V urapon to ̂ia le!leuo[eN qsq]o3s 0q1

l%12\ Ad 9q x UseAuPJ u0 0

6a6t tantry staen o4l

a]luBe guaU

L

sr€d'noprdruoi s3aooe

ar]!€l - aurspo!\l]e.p leu0[eN a?sn[]

(79'xx8s)

N LII X9 gNI33eloO

pue se^ue! uo r0

lz6t aleupacec tta0,1

elqecld g3ueJl

I

Page 16: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

Avnrur-enRDrsM ResumeoThe epochal political crisis of the r93os loomed over the modern movement 1nart and the possibilities available remained circumscribed by it. Not until thereconfiguring of the world after the late rg4os, with the defeat of Fascism, theinception of the nuclear age, and the beginning of the ColdWar, did theground rules alter. After the initial period of post-war reconsrrucrion, by themid-r95os pictorial realism had become identified with artistic conservatismand repressive politics, while modernism spectacularly drew breath and issuedin the NewYork school. Jackson Pollock, Clftrord Still, Barnett Newman,Mark Rothko and others produced abstract art on a scale and with aconfidence that seemed to per-it something new, something unavailable toPiet Mondrian, Joan Mir6 and other European abstract artists. Modernisttheory moreover became highly develop.d, -ort notably in the writings ofClement Greenberg and, later, Michael Fried. Another {actor to take intoaccount is that, behind this intensified achievernent at the levels of bothpractice and theory, the institutional ground of modernism was burrressed inan expanding range of galleries, museums and publications. The relationshipbetween modernist art and its institutional support is not straightforward,however. In the r94os and early r95os, the stance of Pollock, Rothko and otherswas determinedly oppositional. Their art can hardly be said to have been made

Jor the world that consumed it; if anything it was made despite ir, or as part ofan attempt to survive it. Yet later historians have often blurred the distinction,reacting against the claims for artt independence by associating modernist arrwith American power. By the r96os, in the changed circumstances of opposirion

Page 17: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

'(arr.ur 'saaJt o.4{t;o ildtrSoroqd auo iarr.atl 'sra,{toqu?srg tuaprsa.rd o.lrt :atrtl.l's8urppnq Sururng oar) ure8e ra^o pu€ .ra,ro pole:da.r 3yosrr

'Suqgnop Jo tr€ aql

q8noqr lpred 'sqde.rSoroqd 3o uonr.rodrorur aql q8no.rgr trpwd'ue Jo >po^\

otll ;o ssauanbrun oqt 3o uonsanb rqt ssarppe lyreap so.rnDrd rqf 'tsapour

fla,trrtlar arr' II wulalI pur- I wnpa:I'suortrnpord r?tel sn{ Jo aruos Jo sptepuets

arp lg ',8urrurcd ad.,{r-ueruauv paller S;aguaarg r€q.{ pue ltrurapouru€frraurv pal-Erparu 'fsuarunsuo) 'uegrn ue uaa.&tag de8 arp tu€rur a^eq

ot sruaas qrlrl^t 'aJI pue tr€ uaaalag dt8 aqr ur ate.rado or rq8nos er{ 'spro.ll

u.no sS.raguaqlsn€U uI 'sntrrtap aarlourotnr pue spuilur pjgnts Jo llarrc'r

e Sulpnpur srra(qo paprersrp 'sradeds,nau'sqde.rSoroqd :Sultured tsrurrporx

Jo lrPgnads-umrpeur ar{r ra^o poqsgSno.r Surpu'so56r-pFu aqr ur,sSunuredaurguror, Sunleur un8aq peq S.raguagrsneA'$lro.r xaldruor a.re (6-g's8y)

II whpal P]o,e I wwflI'arr,ut Surql aruEs aql slurrd llaterogrlaP Pur llsnoDsuorrH (op S.raguarpsnea uego1 saop req.lt og'3ur1aa3 3o aueld Iesraarun

e ot spuarse pur bua8urluor sadnsa 'anbrun put anlt os Surag lg llasoa.rd'aluetsrun)rn .relnrrt.red leqt 01 asuodsar ur Fnprlrpur reprrt:ed teqt Jo ar€Jl

;elnrrtred reqr Jo lrur1n8urs aqr r€qr uorlrrluor r :>lrtru rrqdr:8orne agr;o'llrssarau arp 'frnrruaqtne tlg rr{t Jo uorllrluor rno uodn puadop il€

'olqlo1

>lretrAl ua^a 'aurl) zu€rC lryog rlrqsrv'Suruoo;1 ap turllrlA'lln5 p.ro3d13'llollod uosrye{'uortlerlsqe p.rnrsa8 Jo Iooqls r lgelruassa s€,t{ usrurrporx

IIlrf,IrauIY.I€lt{-lsocl 'uEIu^{rN llruJeg Jo uolloelxo rlg€lou sLIf qrUA

9utsNtHcsnvu

'tq8q agt otur uraqt Sur8urrg pu€ sturpalalur s1r Sur.ra,rorsrp ssaro.rd aqrur pue '(rusrptrder jaurnsuor lueqdurnur r pue) usrurepour tu€rldrunrrt € Jo

o€J orlt ur saaour IerrtrJr u^ro str 8urryur uorlr.raua8 terlt ueqt 'uorle;aua8.uau

t Sur.rrdsur saprtS-tue.te pur8r.ro aqt Jo ratttru E ssrl 'I[EJrdo 'sEt{ ]J 'drur orll uo

peg drutqrnq rnd'pue18ug ur uotlrrurH prflltl1 pue'€rrrrruv ul o8e3 uqo{pue S.raguagrsn€U ilrgo1 'suqo{.radse{'so56r-pru arp;o apreS-tur,re luaS.raura

fy.nau arlt lq snroy otur >lrtg rq8norq lyacrraga se.tr druerpnq ua^E'plro.{rSuqeods-gsl13ug arp ur u.4{orrTun lla.rrrua rurrt terlt le prureruar'rq8nogr

Ielrlrn sry or slal ur.4{t aqt ara.4{ rusrlllslog pue rusrparrns trqt pa>lJerurrp€q oq.,!t pur 'stsrpnldaruor paSe8ua Jo uorte.rrua? e f,qpa>lo^ur lyssaypua uaaq

'so96r aley aqt ur uorttlsueJt str aJurs 's€rl ,uorrxpo.rdaX Flru€q)aW;o a8y

aqt ur trv Jo lro,{A., asoq,rt 'urtur(urg rJtl€lA'.ue Surllrs-tsaq pu€ tsrurroJuof,.trau r Jo stua8e arue,rpe, pur ,rsed Frrlrl Jrlt jo sralrleJ, ag ot stsrtJe tsrlearJns

pa8pn( S.raguaa.rg 'pa:ou8r se,er usrplrp€r Ierruqlat s,tsurg xetr l pue 'tsure

rreltsge tsrurrpour e se p:p.re8:.r se^r orrtrAJ 'ar:r.r8e141 JurU pue r[ECI rope^Fs

go l.ra8eurr ur€rrp aqt or sala rsruraporu ur polpur,!\p peq usrle?rrng 'rua.redde

aruorrg rusrlrtrnJtsuo3 3o adors llt Jo asuas auos prp 'uawudxT luat3 aq1slerg qpruea y z96r ur uouer{gnd arp yrun toN'pateratrlgo lldurrs alrnb

sen p.ren8ue,r tar^os lll'Jpre8-tue^e aqt parrng pEq ,plor puE toq qtog ,sr€,r

Jo alggnr rqf 'araq er€ tr€ I€DdaruoJ pa8pag l1p; e ;o spaas aql'sartrlnre

trc rgnads-runrparu-uou p '{etw ue ur aprrS-turle aqt Jo uorte rur8ar e aruerosl€ aJarlt 'so56r agt ur rusruJapour Jo afuatse.ropa aqt rltra lltuaJJnluoJ

::.trod Ief,rtrrf, str Jo paur€lp u*g tou peq tre lsrurrpour'portod.re.n-tsodaterparurur aqt ur tng 'uars rg ot rur€J s8urqr,noq rl teqt 're.,!r urtutarn aqt ol

Page 18: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

But mole particularly, the narks of art itself are doubled in the repeated daubsof Abstract Expressionrst painting. These :rre tolers of spontaneity; authenticrtyis placed ir.r qrrotatior.r lnalks. The works'subject n.ratter is the institutionalisationof spor-rtaneitr'.

Fdttwn I and Fdctum lI need each other.The meaning of rhe work elnergcs inthc'sp:rce betwecn the two pictur-es, or between that space ancl a thir.l element:

the description, or type,'gestural abstract painting'. B)i the later r95os, with so-

called'second generation'Absffact Expressionism, the struggle fol authentrcrtyh:rd becone a style. Four years earlier, Rauschenberg had taken a dilferent kind

J}

: ; ; , i t i

, . ; r i t

i i l s

: :1. t .-r ' . . , , :

I tit! il: I

of .listance fron gestural abstraction in the iconoclastic -Cra sed de KooningDrawirg (fig.ro). Rauschenberg obtained a drawing from de Kooning (with thelatter's support be later said he chose a good one to make its erastrre dilicult)and then set to work laboriouslv rubbing it out. As a kind of critical symbol,the erased de Kooning could hardlv be more economical: rrsing gesture to eiTaccgesture, using the same device of meaning making to un-make one set ofr-r-rear-rings ar-rd institute xnorheri returning the achieved aesthetic unity of thefinishc.-l work of art to the primordial unity whence it came - the blank canvasor sheet of paper (albeit visibly r.r,orlr{.In their dillerent ways, both these

Page 19: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

&ap8,{rd.ua llaraydruor € :.,olrlqlqxa,rqr :r.tJ

arrr€rrua &age8 arp

raao uretrnf anlg ural) FuorteuJrtul uE qdnoJqt pass€d 'uorsello rqt JoJ PaJrqpueg l.relpru e lg.paraa.r8 'Suruado aqt ot srotrsrn'(pto,tr,{1-) aylArl paplt

'srred ur trtaye? uel3 srrl rrlt tE uortrgrqxa 956r s,qary qtl.{t errrer stroJta asaql

;o pnldaruo3-orord tryealt lsoru rr{t Jo ruo 'a.ry lg apeu s8unured :sorpog

par€arus-lured-an1g Jo srlert lq aprur s8urturrd jstunorue lueraglp ro; plosrprqlt's8urlured aruo.rrpouoru (anyg urrry Ieuorteuratul sr palualed ruaur8rdarp) anlq Frrruapr Jo sarJas e :sa.rua8 JrtsrtJ€ Ieuortualuor Jo IelrlrJr sarntsa8

Jo srrrrs E prrenrul ulrD{ sr^A'a)ueJl ul'tg8notp pue uollre tuo-r1 alge-redasur

Sururorag'Irn arp ur grT Ierlos qrr.u lprarrp aS.raru ppogs lre,(p€etsul 'leql

pue ,8ur1urqt Pue ltrrrrteaJf JoJ runlParu ssalasn E st.u tJe I€nsI^, l€ql JaITag aql

uo pasrtuerd aJe r serlrarlre rrtsrlle rraqt teqt rtor.{ JrtEI'sdnor8 qtog uI alrlle'u.ro{ ra8sy 'LS5t w lEuorteuratul lsruort€urs aql pue 'gt6t w papuno; s€.t{

dno.r8 e.rgo3 ar{I'se^rterlrur I€raaes ro; turod Surtrets arp papr,tord usrl€errns

go 6e8a1 aq1('adornE ot uaag peq Sraquaqrsne1 pue suqo{ rpog 'paapul)'lJE uJaPou ru€aJlsureru Jo suorlurauor aql o1 rPntrttE IelrlrJJ € Jo sPeaJr{l

arp dn prd or Suruur8ag osle ara^r rrlu€pv aql Jo eprs rer{to aqt uo 8un1.ro,usrsrrrB 'Si-l aqr ur S.raguarltrsnEu pue suqof ;o arrrre.rd aqr qlr.4t llsnoauerprur5

NVdVr oNV ]dounf

(ue rojas€r arll rg ot osp tno surnt terp Jr ursrurapou o1 suaddeg req16'a8en8uel

rpr,u lqd ar'r sarue8 agr q8norqr 'suorlurluor Jo stas go 8ur1.ro.at arp q8no.rrp

paxpord sr 8urueay41 'parann a.re lagr qrlq.,!r q slxeluor ar{t qtr.{r dn punogsr spro^r ;o Sururaur arp des ot sr t€ql',asn aqt sr Suruearu ar1t, :uratsua8rrr,1131.upn1 yo lqdosopqd rarel aql ruog pa^rrap Suruearu Jo .der^ e go rq8q arp

ur tre ur >lro r pu€ lrr ot un8ag peq suqo{',a8en8uel € ag ot Surtured Surrra4agur,I, runtrrp srq ur srql uorS le.ue palla^er] peq larp aruetsrp arlr dn paturuns

suqof .radsrf tsnr€-.lrolle; pu€ puau; s.Sreguarpsnta 'uonualuor pue a8en8uel

ql€auag aJa.{ 1I se araqds e 'arrueu ueunq otur uol}ua^uot q8nolp Surtsrng se'uolJe)Iunururor, Surlnlapun s€ uorssaJdxa,.tres l;oarp tsruJapotr l 'J?rpo ql€?

punor€ Suryr.rn llruapuadapralur srerunsuol pue srotngrrlsrp 'srarnpord qlur'uortrnpord Surueau;o uarsls pasrFuortntrlsur u€ se pate.rado surJoJ snorJ€

stl ur tre lrertsg€ 'uorleryru8rs Jo srrstg aqt ol u^rop Surrra8 pur aErSSeg

Ierntlnr agt Suruosrlla( 3o 'uorrelprsrp pue uortngr:nd go lSoloapr pasreaqrr

-lle,.u aqt alrdsaq 'tuatsls € se tJ€;o Surpurts.Iapun uB sE.r{ srusruJrporua,lrDadsar rleql urog aluetsrp lefrlrJf ,suortelaua8 rpog Surur.ro;ur uorldar.rad

I€rluar aql'rel11plro1\]srrC aqt Jo r^r arlt uo duerpnq Sulrr; asorpruou soJuetsurnrJrf luaragrp fta,r ur tragle 'usruJaporu puolag ft.tl e Surlaas

se^lasuaqt 'stsrtJe Jo uorteJaua8 ta8unol e qlr.,lr uJnt ul prterfosse our€fag

6e8a1 s,drueqrnq 'a8e3 uqo{ rasodruoJ lp r{tr,lt drqspuau; srq q8norgl'sesuas aqt ot fiErqr ur ]re ue Jo suort€tnu1 arp lg parog aruo)?g 3ur,u1 'punu

llt Jo all^tas aqt ot tJe uJntal ol se&r Jarl.rtr l.rntuar-.ret.renb e sapeur{pea:aqt qtr.4{ papuatur peq aq lerlr\ leql sof5r arp ur pa>lreuar peq durerpnq

'rrrsls^s otw PaSlPolarrrorag 'ralorJour pue 'peqr€eJ ueag s€q uorssardxa lenprlrpur Jo tnu{ aql

aJuo,(uo oB or ^roH, uorrsanb aqr or sJa,r{sue luasa.rda.r SroguarpsneX lg sryo.u

]senDeS qtrurs

lpjequrau asrno'l pueyB snou-ri{uoue ue pueeseqcind IJoA/r aN UVujopol lro unssn!\l 0l.ll

\%98xy,79)2 06 x 6'ssl

se ueSuo reded pelured

pue su0Dcnp0.r00Jladeds/r\au 'cuqe]

leded 'uo^erJ'Iul';ro:Burlured eurquo3

L96l il wnt?eJ

fuequeqcsneg yaqog

6

u0Nall0cezued aql'salaFuV sol

'uV {JeroduetuoJ

,0 urnosnn eql

PAgtxy,tg)z'06 x 6'99tr

seAuecuo Jadsd palured

pue suo[cnpuoerrodedsmeu 'cuqej

ledpd 'uo^eJc 'Iul'l!o:tulluled aulquoC

L96t I wnlce!

Froquoqcsneu Uoqou8

Page 20: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

Elsewhere, the Grrtai grorrp in Japan embarked on a series of performance-tlpt' :rctivities in r955/56, inclrrding a walk along a white line and the collectionof water ir.r the depressions of plastic strips Ioosely slung betrveen trees (fig.u).The journal that had printecl the Gutai mar.rifesto in r956, CeijutstrShincho, alsodeveloped links with the ltalian avant-garde, put lishing Piero Manzoni's essav'Free

Dimelrsiori, in which he commented:'Expression, imagination,abstraction, are they not in thenselves emptv ir.rl'entions)'. L.r ltaly, Malrzoniessayed the transfbrnation of l iving people into'works of art 'bl signing ther.n

(painting) and standing ther.n on portablc plinths (sculpture). ln r959, heproduced :r series of u'orks further challenging thc 'r'isuality'

of visual art.The'Lines'were

produced on rolls of paper turning on:r machine, e:rch :rctionhavilrg a particular duration, and the completed drawing consistir.rg of rhelength of p:iper covered bi' the line in tl.rat tine. The rwist is that the linedscroll is then encased in a cardboarcl cylir.rder, with a srnall section stuck to theoutside and hence acting as a label, amplif ied by a written clescription includingthe length of the line, tht' clate, t-tc. The drawing itself remains invisible. Tl.re

10Roben Rauschen be€

Drawing 1953

Tncesof inkandcrayon on paperwiihhand lettercd ink label,n go d]eafframe64.1x 55.3l25 tx,2I7)San Francsco Museumoffulodern Art,Purchased lhrough agft of Phy is Wattis

1 1Sadamasa l otonoga

Water 1956

As reconstructed lorthe1987Venice B ennale(Akira Kamayama's

the foreground befeathWatel

12Pierc Manzoni

1961

[1eia and paper4.8 x 6.5 (1r l x 2r)Prlvate collecllon, [4 an

Page 21: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

'r.rtd ? aq ot ursruJapou pa^arTrqdarlt qrrq,u ;o

'Jnsrue pu€ Frtros qloq 'onb sruels e;o 1ef,nuf, sa^lasuraql.raprsuol ot papuol slsruo8rlord asor1,,n ,sortrarre

,apre3-tut^t-o3u, Joa8ue: snoauaSo;ataq ..rotu qf,nru E :oJ Jruara;ar a,lDe8au 3o turod aqr paprao:d

:rrne;d put l.roaqr Jo :arsnJ)pore.rSarur lpua.rrdde srgg per:1

Ia€qrrlll Jo >lro.r aqr lq llqerou

tsolll 'papuJtxa puE potuaruaydurocst,t 8ur:r.r,u s,8.requ:ar9'so96r-prur

:t1t u1 (!96r ur ur:og 3^nru5f,p ur8ur:radde pue 'zn4hJ pub uy tLrorJpulrruo q8noLl ocyor ur p.l.oduror

lltu13 r.ro),3unwt4 tsrur.potrAL' ts a^oqe 'pu€ lo[rer:sqy dl.ralure6

tsod,',ursruorssa.rdxg ttrtrrsqVJrUV s€ qtrns stxat .:rate1 lq p:grtdure

'r9or ur parradde q: tyw rmtf) luvly uonrolor desse s,S.raquaa:rg sr,u

Suuuttd stqt Suruurd:apun lloaqtay) tal tkrlsslrll smrol aq1'rlstryg sap{

Pu€ PUEIoN qtauu.) 'srno.I srJJotr lSurpnput'slsruorlrrrtsqe,lyr:tured

-tsod, paler-os 3o uoue.r:ua8ag: 3o >po,u 8ur8.rau;a l1.uau u:tp

?ql lq auroq Suraq sen Sur,rour prssr,4{ ursruJaPou lEqt turtP Jqt Jo

rq8ra^\ aqr so96r lp?a agr,,fq q8noqr'uortrP"rl srqt Jo tueuro^anllE

JsuJtur lsour aql sluesa.rdar llgenSJto{qrod T?l/,\tr Jo IJo 1 a.rntElu :qf

';o:et-:ads at1 ur .r-ruor:.rdx: :r:aqt<cepat€.uuaf,uof, E Jo uoutrnpold aql

rE palure '('rlr 'l€t.ul 'poo,,!{ 'auols'rured) unrpaur aqr 1o sau:ado:d

e,tssa.rdxa aqt ;o uor:eroldxaJLn UO Sr tPUr:(rrrrrr.:ds '_t_ -' ": .'_1_ -:-:t:--"

-urnrp:ru uo pasrura.rd sr,,ntJ€ tsrurapow J]uanHur stl Jo tr{iraq.qt tr uaqt tusrulJpotu s€,,!t aJarlt puBrl.uo ar{t uO 'trE ur uorsr,up daap r ol saynsat ,uaqt so96r aqt otul ulru JqI

'(zr'39) p1o3 urtqBlo.4{ sll Jo tu3le rnba lauour aq: se,n rpq,u go alrd :aryelrr JrIt ,tn{s s,tsr-t.ru

rrll Sulurctuotr suet hauru.ws1ua,y aya1,tr srg qu,ur 196r ur auer tre Jo snt€tspagrpouruot llSursEaJlw Jrf Jo uoltel?^ar aura.uxJ tsoru sruozuEl\l .ratteru

Fa(qns slr Jo tlrd s€ ltJllqlsl^ul slqt Jo ?apr ?qt papnpu snql,tre Jo );o,rJ

Page 22: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

FluxusOne of the most immediately obvious features of the range of avant-gardepractices broadly opposed to modernism was their abrogation of medrum-specificiry. Allan Kaprow wrote:'The young artist of today need no longer say"I am a painter" or "a poet" or "a dancer". He is simply an "artist". A11 of lifewill be open to himlThis kind of affitude tended to create a very opensituation, quite distinct from the exclusivity of modernist art. That opennesswas exemplified by Fluxus. As we have already noted, the first use of the term'Concept

Art'occurs in the writings of Henry Flynt in r95r. Flynt's article aroseout of Fluxus activity in NewYork, but the group had a wider catchment,embracing artists from Asia and Europe, as well as the United States.YokoOno had taken up residence in NewYork and was involved in many Fluxusactivities both there and in her native Japan. These ranged from 'instrucrion

- \

::

paintings', to vocalisations at (concrete

music' events, to performances. Some ofthese, in her use of her own bodp a,nd the evocation of extremely edgymale/female power relations, prefigure later more overtly feminist work. Oneresonant example was the Cut Piece in which Ono knelt on srage while malemembers of the audience one by one cut away pieces of her clothing wirh alarge pair of scissors (fig.t;).

The prevailing ethos of Fluxus was a mixture of sharp criticism and whimsy,captured by Dick Higgins'remark that many arrisrs in the late r95os and earlyr96os began to believe thatl'coffee cups can be more beautiful than fancysculptures'.This sense of the potential beauty of the overlooked and theordinary chimes with a long tradition of avant-gardist activity, keeping irsdistance from the pomp and protocols of

'high cuhure', which it roundly

identified with the bourgeoisie. A photograph of 1963 shows Henry Flynt and a

Yoko ono

Cut Piece 7964

Photograph ofperformance in Kyoto

74George Maciunas

Fluxus Manifesto 7963

Offset on paper20.3 x 15.2 (8 x 6)Gi lbert Lei la Si lvermanFluxus Collection

Page 23: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

sursrapuv slao;a'(SI'8y) slnag qdeso{ st,tt luerurag uI sllxnlC uI pr^lo^ullu€rog osp orl.4{ rsorlt Suoruv'srrrotrAl lg rxar t s€ ]lJ^\ sE 'rrrrd,tJV tdJluoJ,

s,rudlg prur€tuor y:rtu,u'Goptlt rI,. snxnlC all Jo rotlpr oslt st.lt 3uno1'sr"r.ro7g

?og % PaFrlqns s€.{L put 'o96t ',otq uorlrsodulo, P3ltrt sr.n srqa'Suno atuotr{ e'Ilg a.rors Flrsnru e ol ';odrd ralu.ltadll rrJ^rTO Jo IIor t Suop '1utr:d ur poddryrptaq srLI paSSerp rLI qlg^{ ur'yuag.tog uaz parnroJrad 1t4

'296r uI urptqsol1\ur F^nsr; snxn]C rLIr rV 'ryr6 aun{ urtN rsDre uraro) rLIt s€.u LIlr.4{ pr>lro,{\

Pue trrrr JtI rsoLlt Suoruy 'slur^a Prsnq-sruErrr;o3.rad pue lrsnlu Jo Jrgrunu

e pa8ers rLI r,r3ll,&t lutru.rog ot tur,M stunlr€tr d 'of,roC rlv uttrIrrrrrv rt{t LItI.u

rou8rsop t se 8urryo..n '196r arel u1'ol lou sr llsnorros snxnlC

r>ler or le.u, rsog 3rlt rerlt :g 11o.u, ltur

rI ',trv Jo rp.rr8 Surpuedxa-rrar rLIl

PUt'ssoutrsrJor ]€Jntlnr Jo sPuErgu.ro rno lg.uou pal€C 'rrntlnr

.rt..lr-lsod ru€orf,sur€ru 3o sarror.rdord

trnls-pJ#nts puE uortetuourrS:.r?ql ol JlsodIJ JIeJ t set\\ szynl

ouoc! fno Surrry 'prrtrurtsrrrpun

ag lou Plnorls srllt ur^r

lng 'uortl€ d;r:uortnl0.t:J Jo tuogpalrun e qlr.u urqt uoqrl4 druoy4l

tllra{ uouJuJof ur aJorlr Pri{ a^€rlol lradso.rla.r ur uraas sJrlrlrlJ€ JrJrll

yo lunu 'rlntln) .l81r1 J" suountrtsurllt ur pa5rurrunu Surog 31aslr

sr rrpuraqdr.rrd snxnlg ttrlt ,ttoN

'uorlle

E luoU PslIun olul s3I:IeuollnlorrJ-I

prnqod € pnos'lerrulnr Jo srrptlf,qt rsl-rl 'spuorssa;o:d pur saturlalp

'srrtr.rr lluo rou 'saldoad p .{g padsr:8.. ^. r. .-.. -'or-uo:d'JlB-uup lrc-uuu dJ

't:e 3urnr1 JtouJord " trr'l)prlsqB trf

ItsrJ9u.ru uuiJr:lrur Lrc PBJP Jo Pllo,4{:qr o8rnd l:rn11nr p;zrlErr.rruruol

4 yeuorssa;o;d',Fntrrllrlur,'sstru>prs sroaS:noc1 Jo pl.ro.4{ aqr a3:n4

{/)'.i,.1/n) jo titpd '>y,S

T{nl

u o't+ ttotd tJ bu oJ-(n laA a)

a luotj Pa-ftun a+t'|.t

1:',tttl:1. x *l::"

, rlzuotrtalotJ [,ut ;,A./ub+]l..tl:

-tr',l,tr,l^yuo lou

' stldoad 11o.. La pa4sotb Lll .t

>q a+ AInY e> !>V .\(,Nv1o*o-d

' J'A - 4uA "Jln bu|tl aPwo)d

T 'JzV NI 34tJ 4NV

<7oa71 /\AvNOUA1aA?z, v 2joHa>d

i ,, wslNVJoznS', Jo <i1ao/tl 3w 39znd'-

| JJa lb)tleMal{aw ,'JJo

)t.lr:uatsalf !(.)-tb

J)a)+t4a '1La'

1ar)rf t 1ra

qo!lbltMt ])b

A I i .ltztth-

olsaJ tuar',1

:(fr'8g) spro.u,s€unrrrt lrrr^\ ',xnp, pro.&L Jr-[] Jo suortrugap lrtuorlrrp qtr.4{ rrrltoSor po8qlo3

'!96r ur olsaJiual,y s dno:8 olit sr prllsrlgnd txat E ur apntrl? rlit Jo suort€r4dur

prrtryod-onos rLIl p3urlrapun 'snxnlC ?rutru aqt pourotr oq,urstunrlrytr o8roog'(iatnl]n] snor.las qsr]orurc, pu€ ,isurnrsntr { trv lisrTotuac, durp€ar s>lf,au rrrrllpunor Sur8utq sp;ereld lsurB qrr.u 'lro .uaN ur trv urrpory Jo urnJsnry JLIIot rru€;tu? rqt aprstno ollrs ap.re8-rutl€ an.n ur Surrsato;d qrtug >pe{ an8eallor

Page 24: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

description of Beuys'-Errasiaperforrnance from 1966, reprinted in Lippard's Srx

hars antholoey, is worth quoting at length:

Kneeling, Beuys slowly pushed two small crosses which were lying on the floortowards a blackboard; on each cross was a watch with an adjusted alarm. On the

board he drew a cross which he then half erased; underneath he wrote'Eurasia'.The

remainder of the piece consisted of Beuys manoeuvring along a marked line, a dead

rabbit whose legs and ears were extended by long thin black wooden poles. When the

rabbit was on his shoulders, the poles touched the floor. Beuys moved from the wall

to the boatd where he deposited the tabbit. On the way back, three things happcned:

he sprilrHei white powder betweerr the rabbit's legs, put a thermometer in its mouth,

and blew into a tube. Afterwards he turned to the board with the erased cross and

allowed the rabbit to twitch his ears while he himself allowed one foot, which was

tied to an iron plate, to float over a similar plate, on the 11oor. This was the main

content of the action.The symbols are completely cleat and they are all translatable.

The division of the cross is the split between East andWest, Rome and Byzantlum.

The half cross is the United Europe and Asia, to which the rabbit is on its way.The

iron plate on the floor is a metaphor - it is hard to walk and the ground is frozen.

Through activities like this, Beuys rapidly became one of the most

prominent artists in the international avant-garde. His incorporation of

animals into his performances, and activities such as the planting of ffees,

combined with extensive free-forrn'teaching'sessions, also led to his being seen

as a significant figure in the politics of culture, particularly in respect of the

emergence of the'Green'movement in Germany. But it is worth recognising

that however suggestive and uncanny they rnay have been, Beuys'activities

remain somewhat ambivalent.Thus, while the Eurasia performance may well

function allegorically, it is quite wrong to say that its symbols are'completely

clear'.They are nol Part of what has happened in moderniq' has been the

fracturing of public symbolism, or its etioladon into the terms and themes of

the mass media. Allegories such as the one performed here require assent to

stipulative definition if they are to work ('The erased cross means ...';'The

dead rabbit means ...';'Fat signifies X';'Felt signifiesY'; and so on). And that

requires assent to authority, namely the authority of the artist conceived as

shaman. Beuys may offer a critique of the materialism of the consumer society,

and of power relations in the world.Yet while speaking a language of enabling

and opportunity on the one hand (as in his argument that'Not just a few are

called, but everyone'), he relied on the exercise of charismatic authority to

establish his platform. One thing we can perhaps say with'complete .iarity'i.

that Beuys can be positioned within an irrationalist tendency in German

thought and art with its roots in the late eighteenth century, in the Rornanticcritique of Enlightenment rationalism.

As with many other kinds of performance-based art, this raises questions of

the kind we posed at the start: about the nature of Conceptual art, and its

re lat ionship to cr i t ic ism. analys is and the demyst i f icat ion of ar t 's susra in ingideologies. How one conceives Fluxus activities in general, or Beuys in

particular, in relation to Conceptual art is largely a matter of definition. If we

restrict our sense of Conceptual art to a language-based investigation of the

15Joseph Beuys

Eurasia 1966

Photograph ofperformance at the TateGallery

Page 25: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

qJrq,4{ Jo alrlos rJJur€x suuo^ qtr.,!\ :Fo,4{ PJsrq-arurcr.roj.lJd ()1 uoElPPe

cJ so96r l]r"r rr.Jt uro.r-J srrror l traqo; -lo ).ro,,rl rLIl lq p3pl^o:d sr ,rodo:d r.rtpudaruo3 pur 'srrxnlg 'uourpe:r uerdurrqrnc aqr !ra..4{rf,q lurT ]EIn.Il ruo

sruu01^|

I'JEluautPunj sr snxnll uJql ^rrtr5rtracls-runrPJur

;o uorreSo:qe rreqr lq dyuo 11e re 3r pf,yrun srur^uf,E -+o purq pEo.lq E apnllur olursrS:uda:uor ;o asuas rno puatxJ J,,lr JI'erLuorloq Fuor]eu::tur;o puno:3le1de 'lJuuErp ?ql uo Jsrou jo pull t st s.:rl?addt snxnlg 'rusrunpour

3o suortdunsst

Page 26: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

included the modular elements he later developed into his Minimalistsculpture, during the early r96os Morris was also making a range of enigmatic'Duchampian'

objects. Some of these involved quotidian items (such as a bunchof keys or a ruler) cast in lead; one employed a photograph of the artistt body;there were casts of body parts and traces (a fist, footprints); and marry involvedwords. Some were highly self referential, seeming to parody the modernisrobsession with the autonomy of the art object.With one foot in the camp ofthe read),tnade, Card Fib tecorded the process of its own production throughthe written entries in an alphabetically listed series of forty-four file cards: ftomAccidents toWorking, from the moment of conception ('whilst drinkrng

coffee in the NewYork Public Library') to goilrg out to buy the file itsellA key area of contention between modernism and the more diversified

avant-garde concerned the status of the aesthetic. For modernists, it is not toomuch to say that the aestbetic was the be-all and end-all of arr, irs unigue andproper area of competence, In the case of Fluxus, it was less a question ofrejecting the notion of the aesthetic as of broadening its range of reference,outwards from the medium-specific, formally achieved harmony of amodernist painting to, potentially, anything, an object, a sound or an action. Inlater Conceptual art, the question of the aesthetic was strategically put rn

Page 27: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

'Surre,ugr; se,,r,r -ll sE sno-ra8uep

sr sr^t{ asla Sulpl;a,to LI]I^\ snoulruraror ?ur€faq put lrrruapr u.&o stl PunortprlJn) tr€ ararl^t rurod aq1'paapur apl.4{ ?ra \ tt€ Jo salr€Punog prruarod

rqr ttrp u^&o surslurepou se Suoy se lrorsrg e ra^o Pat€rtsuouaP peq ap;e8-tue^€ rqt 'ued str :og'rg8rs Jo tno pareoddesrp lya,urraga peq tr 'luaunS.re

aqr or pannuruor /1ry tou auolue roJ r€ql lltltgtt,ttt;o neareyd q8nl€ qrns otuo rrtl{tsar agr paqsnd peg sSurrured plrg-rnolo) ra^o1lv'rf,uara;ar

-gyas pagrrnd Jo euDe aqt 'tr Supunorrns asrou Fllrotarlr agl or Surprorre

tsErl tE 'st^t trB tsruraPotr l 'uorltsod Itrltlrf, e Paqlear peq s8urgr 'uar1l 'so96r

-plur aql lg'p.reoqraplp algepuarxa llaluyur s.tre uo a.lotu s,tq8rul orour ruo

or dn pappt lla.raur uoltJrsst s,srrrotrAl 'ttt1s s,tuozuery uala.ro spoofi Ploqasnoqs,durnpnq Jo as€r ar{} ur ueqt os ssrl oN'sell IIts tr leqt 'asJnol

3o rdarxg'l{Is€.tr tI uJqt ')Je

4usutvr lr PIES lsllJe

arp 3r 'ua1ol rur€s ?qt lg 'rerp Surlts rraga uI sI srrrotrAl 'sle,tr qrog tnl rul€lr

rqt uallt ',ue s tr uillt 'tre Tr slrs rsrlre ?qt JI, teql 'rr rnd ppn{ plEuoc s€ 'rs€l

aqt sr.{r lypar rr;r 1n;;a.uod-lle sEt{ tsuft aqt;o Auorpne aql 31 '(9r'3g),f96r

'5r .ragura,log'prtrq'turtuo) pue lrrpnb qrns ou s€q uollrnrtsuor ples JoaJaqotrp aqr tuo5 r€qt sarepap pue turtuol put 6rpnb rltaqtsee II€ uolt)nrtsuof,

Pres lrlo5 s.&ttrPtllr.{{ ^grrrtl 'v rlql{xg Paxauu€ aql uI PaqlrlsaP salua1lI

paprrua uoDrnrtsuor Ftatu rqt Jo ralEur illt tsurag'SIXXOW IUESOU'pau8rs.rapun oq1.:pear r1 lrero5l )llqnd e lg passautr,n {p8a1 pue slrrotrAl

lq pau8rs 'raded;o taaqs uenlr^radll e sen 'rur€U Iltra^o aur€s eqt uI prsollur

rnq 'sqt Jo rjrl rqr oI',y rlqIIXE, pauortdn se.tt srr1l'roqs,-8nur arrlod e ay1

'uo-aPrs Pue uo-tuo5 'stfaose 0.&L1 ruo5 u2>1ef 'satupltl

Jo turrourr P€rl rtH E rPrs

purg-rg8u llt uo :arald tred-o^tt € parnpord.rtou srr.roy41 'sasod.rnd raqro ro;

parnpo.rd llpulSr.ro srralgo uo snt€ts u€ Surrra;uor 3o lSare.rrs uerdrueqrnq

aLIt tr? ur or lrrunl.roddo aLIt slr;ory Surar8 lga.ragt 'iroa aql roJ Surledur rt€l s€.&r uosuqo{'rr^r^roH '(l:y u:apo61 Jo urnasntrAl aqt Jo uolpallor

eqt paratua lyruanbasgns pue) uosugol d111.la lq rq8nog se.tr lro.& aql'(suqo{ radsr{ :are1 'pue stsrlearrns eqt 'drueqrnq st qrns srsrl.re lg parnpo.rd

spafqo rr]eru8rua Jerlrea rltr^r prterfosse lrraod aqr Jo aruos Suunlderaruaq pue) raqto ?qt Jo ql€ar Jo tno rr^rro3 ouo rqt'sla1;o qrung E pu€

alogla>1 e Surureruor xog para^or-peal E :pauorruaur lpeo.rp a^Eq a.4{ rra(go;osadlr arp Jo auo sr.,[ '>lJo ,ttaN ur ,&toqs ueru-auo ]srg srq te Prtlgqxr

's:r!ual!I

>lro..lr srH lylrarrp lr ssarppe or lrrunr.roddo^arll >loot srrrotrAl 't96r u1'lrntuar

qtarlur^{t aqt Jo rPetraP Puoras aqt arurs trB 6ur.4{oPeqs anssr ue uaog Peq slqf'lou ro trreru Jrlaqlsae peq tr Jaqraqn pue '1ou Jo lJ€ Jo lJo^r E st,u 8un1]auos

Jaqlaqa lrs o1 se,tr lr ssawsng asoq^r Jo JattBru ?qtfauJa)uo) Jnssl 1e lutodla1 y 'ssarppe ot tr ro; anssr u€ se tr€ Irrrtrr) .ro; po8 e qlilu os tou :sra>lr€rq

u0surl0r0!llqd J0 Ule 404 rr aNuv uropou{ J0 urnasny{

(%ezx%Ll)t'09 x 8 tt

leur raqleal u0[e]rurlU0 pelunoul p00/r1

re^o peal J0 laaqs puer00e0 u0 luaualelspesuelou pue ped,il

t96luewnco1

s|jJolil uoqou9I

Page 28: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

+

Anrns lorlConceptual art grew in a space created by the avant-garde, and used it to mounta far-reaching critique of the assumptions of artistic modernism, in particularits exclusive focus on the aesthetic and claims for the autonomy of art. Themodernist critic Clement Greenberg, discussing the origins of modernism inthe late nineteenth century, had spoken of a process of'dialectical inversion'.He was referring to the paradoxical development wherein modern artists hadset out to try to find adequately new ways of representing their unprecedentedmodern world of boulevards, caf6-concerts and railway stations, and had endedby producing an art of autonomous visual effects. It can be argued that thereverse happened with Conceptual art. Claims that painting'appealed toeyesight alone', that visual art's'primordial condition was that it is made to belooked at, themselves becarne the subjects of a new kind of reflection. And theparadox this time was that raising questions about autonomous art opened up aregister of far wider issues; the modern world began to return to the agenda ofa modern art. This is, of course, to overstate its absence. No less a figure than

Jackson Pollock had said of his abstract art that it was a response to thedemands of a new age. But low abstract art did that, and what the nature of itsresponse was, had become less and less clear as modernism had turned into'post-painterly

abstractiori. In the rapidly changing conditions of the r96os,many artists grew sceptical of what was beginning to look like a modernincarnation of art for art's sake. As Claes Oldenburg put it:'I am for an art thatdoes something other than sit on its ass in a museum'. The title of a laterretrospective exhibition of ry95 encapsulated the new agenda: Conceptual art

t7Frank Stella

Six Mile Bottom 7960

l\4etallic paint oncanvas300x782.2(778 x 77 %)Tate

Page 29: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

'IIt,4\ trlP or IalPltd aJEJ.rns^ ]elnduellJl LLrroJIun r r{11,{\ JuoP rq Plnol. qlnlll osdlug Sunure<l3o;.rue oqr rpds ptq Jrqr Europ os ur rnq'llun pue ssrurlorl,^{

Jo IJ^a1,,!,\ru E ol uor:f,€]rsge urler peq pueloN rirruua;1 dpurnbasqns

pu€ uEur^{.N llJo;eg;o Surrured :rp .,w:r,l srq u1 '::rsoddo aqr uJaq J,\erl

ot sur.3s uossr] Jqt '.lJ^J,,ror{ 'ppnl roC F?.lrtrl rtll Jo uon?slFnlrl^ r PJ^.Iqrtpeq rl]Jrs -]r sr :rorerrads ruaqlrdu{s aqr ul ellF^ fuJqrs)e Jo uoulr^uol t

Surylaciuo: ;o :lqeder se,u teqt ru:o;3o l:rrm 1n3l:o1 orour puE ,,!r.ru € pr^rlrptrlyerg ',:deqs

;taurd:p, srr pue Surrurrd :rqr go,rdtqs pnr4, rql uaa,tlaq de8:qr Sursop lq reqr p:n8:r peug',u.rroq se :deqg,Iesse aqr '3unurcd rsruraporu

ro; aBen8uq e :3ro1 ol srdrue:rexalduor fla,trsnla rsotu srLI Jo ?uo uI

'PJr.rc latqrrtr l lqr.lr lsruJaPoul

:q: lq pua pprr{ ppuog :ordprs

tsqrrururlrq l.1t d<1 rpog pauordurtqra.ra,,r laqt rtrlt sr ::t leudaruo3

;o oru:3r:ur: aq: pue rusruropolu

Jo srsr.rtr Jrp .ro3 runrgruSrs os syo,,u asaqls:1eur rrq11'(/r'3g) u.rro; pur:tur :q:

peoq:: :deqs 1er:,to .qr reqr os sJprs rqlSuq8ur :o srqrtou tr-ro Suutn: 'se^url Jrll

p:deqs 11t a,rogt puv 1p.u eq: or 1a1p.rrdpltunoul qe]s e Jure::g 3ur:ured :gt

ltun srrq rarltrt..ls:r1t paurdaop lraddor

pu? runrururnl? s€ r[]ns 'slurcd ]ErlgrlJE

JJoru .r.^J pJsn ellltq se s:e0,,( ,ur3 lxruaqt la^o pJ(r.r5uol sE^l J^oru snll [a^al,r\Ju E ot ulsrFrlatnur slr )oot 1r sE u3^tSunurrd rsru::potu ;o rrrdse a.lne:oao

rqt PauJtEa]qt trqt urs{rrrtr] r ParPoqur'rlsl.uq s.rolEnor?p E !rla teH poqddt

:urcd :ql 'edeqs se,ruer :qr 8uror1::sedurs >pryq.rtln8a: 3o pasoduror

',s8urrurc6 ptyg, sellarg naga a.usso;dxa

Jo luJruJ^JrqlE Jrlt 'tu)uodruol lJr-ltosrusruJJpour p.llnuur tsourye lrqt teqt

l1e:utqduro os tr prp larp 'uorrnpa:r

go rr3o1 rsrur:pour :ql patrasse l:glJ]lq,,i,r 'rtqr SuroFq8noroLll os uorlrn.rlsqe

u? Jo sJslr^uEr P.rqrLlxa Prq rlJats'6!6r se l1:ra sy'r:e pr.r:d::uo3 ot:su r,re8 rprq,n':preF tue,re:q:1o s:tr:tr;d

tsruJJpour-rJtunoJ,,qsnor.rE^ Jrlt pu? ursrul.poru ul?r!{tJq uou€tuoguoJJqr ur lnr)el3 Jo rurod prx:r r srurs::d:: r11u51ut.rl jo {ro,,!,! JqI

l,llsrlvllrNrl l 0Nv vr'Ers

.{ru.loporu Jo ftotsll.rJpr,4,\ t ot uourla: ur ;sod;rd st:r tnoqe pue 'lturt:e

:re ;o sl,tapo-rd:r1: Suru.rJfuo) suouslnb Sutsru :noqr sur,r :y ',1:lqo, p.to,n eqt

Jo 'ra^o3roru 'sJsurs qtoq ur pue ',try

Jo r::196 :qr Surr:prsuotJu, tnocl? se,,!\

Page 30: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

Stella's emphasis on the literfiess of the painting's support through his deepsffetchers and shaped canvases pointed to something else: to getting the work

offthe wall and into three-dimensional soace,The result was an art of what

Jr,rdd calJed Specific Objecrs, and what the world has come ro krow as

Minimalism.For Fried, this was tartamount to a dedaration of war on modernism - the

invasion of art by what he called 'theatricality': a kind of staged performance

encountered in literal space ard in real time by an embodied spectator, tot the

elevation out of that condition into an instant of aesthetic 'presentness'.

ForFried, modernist art defeated time, the realrn of contingency, and to reduce art

to the condition of eveq/thing else was something like treason. For many in the

generation of the mid-r96os, however, it was not; it was a sudden andfundamental opening up of art. It was another of those charged moments ofthe kind we have already noted c.r9ro-r5, when abstract art, all form arld

trarshistorical essence, issued in the readyrnade, all contingency and context,

The Minimal object, literal thing in real space, shorn of composition andhandicraft, the endgame for the modernist preoccupation with form, wentthrough the looking glass and in no time at a1l gave rise to Antiform: the workof art as anything, bits of waste, felt, rurdifferentiated stuff, and even no

'things'

at all but actions and'ideas'. Once again, as at tle beginning of abstraction, it isas if the pararneters of the field were rnapped in a mornenlThat extended'moment', from the beginning of the decade to the mid-r96os, whenmodernism gave onto Minimalism, whidr in nrrn gave onto Antiform, may beregarded as the gestation period of a full-blown Conceptual art.

PArNfl cA kind of test case was provided by the painting of Kenneth Noland and JulesOlitski (fig.r8). For Michael Fried, this work was exemplary of that to whichmodernist art could aspire. As with Stella, it'cornpelled conviction'. What it

Page 31: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

uo pJlrrPordir 's)ooallxr:) uotttlrsrdde-tie ruo.:g.:lo sJltlD llu uro]J suollulonb

Jo Sunsrsuor s8unuttd go srr::rs t plxpo.rcl uess:p1:g uqo{'r:rurt5rp3

ur 'g-1,96r Bur.rnp osly (6r'3q),rsr::e oqr or {luo uuou) 'tr.Irrs iltLIJuErqrJcl

tdal rr1 ol art ru:tuof Jrlt -Jo suoIsuJuIrP Purl.IJlrtrtrir Jrlt :JIqrsr,\LIl

s-r EuuorEd srql Jo ruJruol JqL :ptrr :lrLll 1r.l Suliuedtuoflt ut Pult )lenbs

)lf,tlg t 1o Surrsrsuo: >l:oar llr:d-o,'r{l e s-9{{ sltll 'luJuloru l:eulSlro s uorllc:lsqe

-1o tu;ur:3p1,r'toupe ut u1 '(g-196r) ii tiiutri<l p.trS ut uorlJr-rts.lir PJ,toPtLIsrtqr anbrrsiur:til 1':rpo:ecl osp peq rq'.r:r1:t.r lprlF4q tr/.Ltstlv %)aat PigqnP

uJr{l su.{\ tI :,yo9, Pur: ,L/uf6, s::rr8y oql pJI]IJIIJls slr,!\ purroJF ,{o:3 ssog,'u

Lro sri\utl r pa:opord u:psrue; p1,,q '996r ur 1:o1.u:g u1 s::c;:ns untl:r:r1r

ur p1:o.t Sursserl rqt p.r.rude: '.rsJno) Jo

'qrIrJ,l{'Jluolqrouotu.[qrss^o.] tsJ.rJJqs

:qt ',s8ul]urerJ :o::rl!r, J]npord ot tJlLls rl:1stld :,utr:g:r ']uJLltLIis- t PtrrlflJ.rts

ur,llpFg ItrrrltrrJ,^{ 'put1"8uq ur'!96r st lFE.) sV'uou.IuourLld puoueu:.rtut ut

serllt !s^uors.lllrur ap:e8-tuu,ru::r1.rt:r lLrcLu os LII,,!\ sr loreSe.t:rio pny iurtrr:rd

!u uolrtlsqr 5Lrr,{po;t.l o:.1: 'Furslyeue ,{pe r,rp :.rr,,r'r s-lsn.ru ltnrclJruol{1cl rng :rrrn r;o ru:uro8pnloqr plrursr.rd:u ruaruuro.l s,p:eclcll

'lSIl I?

irql or ^lllo rrr\oul 'lrJes

jl rrrJrrlnnJid q :xl or .lu

rtrrtlKD rqr r) rl(rsurtllP PoP-ritar.Irxp aql : olqrsl^trt si

"eurLruu.l slll Jo )rorror rrl.L

',i8oJo.rF,r :urqrs.rtur: rn:,i1asp;;d tnq 'p]ro,ll uJI]tT E LII rurt1rsir

Jrlt -Jo l^DrtuJslrdli rlll ]ou 'JlllolJq PtrJ rusru.IJPoul -Ir se se,ll lr '.iLmrLI

ol rrJpprq pJureluJr J]Jsl rrrp Jrnrlnrrs ri.lrod t or rulrll su,^{ r.r1r u.lJporu

Irqt rurrll 1l uouelrldcn lc1 snqt se,u ryznru Jrns_r,\ sr lrt l:^rurJpour JJs cll'uortc]run.^uol ol Dtnllpt ur 'puJ uE ot sueJlu E st rrslrru sr srql staytur.rr.lns

Lrur 5^trodrrr 's.rot?^aJJ sE rlf11s s^J:eI.J ur puno.rS>Peq Sunltoos .rlrr,iord or p.]s,rsr qlrq,lr 'pJsrr. u.).)c1 r,rtrl sqSno:r prrc s1:ad arp 11t q)rLI^\ Lrrcg rrlsllur tuJI.luE

plnpo:d ,{p:r:'trutuor -:lo purl E or u:,uF:urtu:r1: st,1t211W, r,Ie JJIJ E'Jrsnlrr ot tuJIe,{InDJ Iensr]\ e,Io Jdorl Jqt Pf,r$ro uortlt.rtsqv J,\rltlruu ^.ltirlrl

Jo Jrr^rJs Jrlt uro! lrr Jo uontlJcl] e':og ul.luts rq ot FurLirlruos st,{\ rlsrltu

:lo uorlrPuor JLI]'s_lsD.m Put slllr.rl tsrrrr;pour ,{143 ]6; 13rll ErJr IIr,t\ S-IJPEJX'8ur:oq onar irqt teqt Surirs urrll Jroru lJqtrr ot slLmorqr srLlI',)tznrlr

JEr.rsr^! rri,r siurrurecl s,r1srr19 .rr,r.r,no11 'p:tddr1 .irnl .roJ LIrrrp put ,{tlrll'.rtuu

-'o pJ.lo^l JL{r -lo rno Lrorlr:lrldllr .{t1 pur: ',a:tr3,1o :rtls e olrrt 1t ,{q p:trrcrJq plnol JUo teqt:tsrd:r1t 1o t:c lerruouer.lp ic1 p-r.rpr,ro,rd rr,qt ot t.opnnrb..

'3uqog p:prsrp pue prss::clxr ,{1:suuur ut sr,,r'r;lo uortrr,tuor p:11:duror

qs rnz lo?reqJolcs I0unr810 u0lcallo3

(xgtxtqt)

zaI x I6tplsolottd\f,an x f,an) aat \ zzl

se^uP3 u0xe]rr0 l

8-196IEultulPdtanes

u0psLUeS l0l1l6t

98614rer\ rtcs'1,11 aueSnl sr,\l puB sr,\l]o ure '1]vJ0 u.rnesn l

up 00orlafi a!1ltzrzx a6)

8999x€e€ZSBI\UBC U0 CrI]SV

8961pau,Dst0 arLvl

sIt0 s€tnr8I

Page 32: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

the scalc of modernist abstractioo (fig.zo). Not all Gernan :rrt rl:rs I.rostage romysticism eithcr: in r969 Siglnar Polkc parodiccl thc gcnre rvith Ilr lJglrr-l'or"rr:Connnad: Paint tlx Right tlanl Corntr Bluk (frg.zr).

IDEAsOne gesture sums up the changecl clir.natc. In Augrrst r966, the English artisr

John Latharr, employed :rs a part-t iDre lecturer at St M:irt ins School of Art rn

COMPOSING ON A CANVAS.

STUDY THE COMPOSITION OF PAINTINGS. ASKYOURSELF QUESTIONS WHEN STANDING IN FRONTOF A WELL COMPOSED PICTURE. WHAT FORMATIS USED 2 WHAT IS THE PROPORTION OF HEIGHT TOWIDTH ? WHAT IS THE CENTRAL OBJECT ? WHERE ISIT SITUATED ? HOW IS IT RELATED TO THE FORMAT ?WHATARE THE MAIN DIRECTIONAL FORCES ?T}|EMINOR ONES ? HOW ARE THE SHADES OF DARKAND LIGHT DISTRIBUTED ? WHERE ARETHE DARKSPOTS CONCENTRATED ? THE LIGHT SPOTS ? HOWARE THE EDGES OF THE PICTURE DRAWN INIO THEPICTURE ITSELF ? ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS FORYOURSETF I'VHILE TOOKINGATA FAIRLY UNCOM -PLICATED PICTURE.

London, where rno.lernisln rv:rs a powertirl ir-r{1rrer-rce on thc tcaching, u,ithcJrer.r,a cop1 o1' Crecnberg's Art anrl Culturc {ror.n the college librarl'. Ht- then inlrtcdlike-mindcd Artists lu.r(1 stu(lcnrs to a

'chew-in' (mimicking the

'teach-ins' rnd

'sir-ins'of t l.rc t ime), which involvcd sclccting a page, rc:rring it out, rna.rrcrting

ir, and spitt ir-rg the results into a recepr:rclc providcd. Larh:rrr srrbsequentlvbrokt'clorvn thc;'ulf into l iclLrid with a concotion ol'cht-micals ir.rto whiclryeast r,vas intro.1ucc.l. \Vhcr.r the l ibrerl rcqucsred irs book brck, it rcceive.l :r

20lohn Baldessad

Canpasingon Canvas1966 8

289.6 x 243.8(114 x 96)fuluseum ofContemporary Art, SanDlego Gjft ofthe arris!

2 7SigmarPolke

Btack!1969

150 x 125.5( 5 9 i 4 9 I )

Co ection, Stufr€art

Page 33: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

JP.m6-lur^r -lo uol]r]J-trlo.rL1 JLIl Put uIsru.IJPoru Jo srsr.rl JLll -]o uortturquo)

rql Surl sE,^{ rrpJ rqt ,{lorppnq 'trJdsns ilSursra.rrur .rraddt or SutuutS:q sear

tlall.rur aqt tuo.r-l 1.:lr:lo uorlElnlDJesrP JLI] '^{oN 'suonoulJ Jql -Jo I.r^trI trLIl ltarntrratry put Surrr:tJI rnflJpun or pJrtc{se reqr Surqr.rruos 'uolrtsurs

Jo l.lt oe

uJJq peq ulsru.rJpour 'sJ^nE:rru puno:r p.srurSro uJJq ptrl put JrllrplJllT rltl l

sJuruse sl uo pJpelr pcrl rrr lrruaprtrt 11 rrtld 3ur1t: se,,u:8utq:-eos y',ilntuer qt:rtuo.,ut otEI lit ,Io trr JLp jo launs s run:snur

i Ua J e Lll

zJ€^4qls aIf,g a"{aqo 3trqcat : uslqeJaq uasoa a-IaqoH

Itql ot Jlm.uuJ.qt tt pt.{r1,1srp sr,n l oooz rr:d aqt ur trqt tnq 'yo

,!\JN ur trv urJPow Jo unJsl-rw Jrlt -]o uorllJIIo) f,Llt ur JPTSJJ ^\olr Jsr)trnssrueqtr-1 s:op,{1uo rou trqt uou ot SuusJil}ur sr I '::e yentd::uo3lq tq8nolno8utqr :rr:nb:sqns aqt -'o ralr€ur E sV '(zz Bg) pssnusrp 3o r.lrl sutrqtr-1 pue

!slurrurlll pup slEr^ ssel8 rqt'1ooq ary:,yo,{dor r Fururrtrrol asttrrns- SurIool-utrdruwpnq e go:drqs.l1t ur uo:r lentcloruol e poturqur tre pue')res

:p :oF ipp utqrt j'ttt1li1) ltLp t.tv prlltsrp, pul urtrllr-1 :loqorp -Jo .)qm-tsJl

Page 34: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

gambits meant questions had to be asked about'the object'of art; arrd crucially,not by academics, critics, historiam, philosophers and other interpreters, but bvartists themselves. Theory, so to speak, became a practical matter.

Questions of representation and perception became key issues.The Dutchartist Jan Dibbetts produced a series of'perspective corrections' by plottinglines on a receding wall, or landscape plane, such that when photographed theyappeared to be a square parallel to the picture plane (fig.21).\n Photopath,YtctorBurgin photographed a section of the floor of a room, blew the resultingmonochrome pictures up to life size, and laid them down over the original floor

(fig.;+). Jo""ph K"tuth's 'Proto-

investigations', including sheets ofglass, neon lights, and compoundworks involving objects,photographs and words, are said tohave been realised conceptually - as'ideas'- as early as 1965, though theywere not exhibited until later. Bethat as it may, the works arerepresentative of early conceptualinquiry into the object of att.In Oneand Five Clocks, One andThru Chairsand kindred works, Kosuth drewattention to the relationshipbetween a physical object anddiflerenr kinds of representation olic visual, in the case of thephotographs, verbal in terms of thedictionary definitions (fig.24).

Kosuth's early work was pan of awider rendency that had emerged inNew York. Ar exhibirion organiseoby Mel Bochrrer in late r966 stakedout some of the ground. A hundreddrawings of various kinds werecollected for an end-of-year show atthe School of Vsual Arts.Bureaucratic obstruction meant tharthe drawings could not be

conventionally frained for display. Bochner's solution was to use the then newXerox technology to photocopy them, standard size ar.rd four times over, and'display'them

in four large, looseJeaf notebooks placed in the gallery on thekinds of plinth normally used for sculpture (fig.25). Out of a mixture ofaccident and design, Bodrrer had ordrestrared an event that occupied the veryterritory towards whidr vanguard activity seemed to be heading, the hinterlandwhere art met various forms of non-art, and it became hard to tell thedifference.The problematic sratus of the installation was sustained by theinteraction of its constituent elements: the variety of the 'drawings'

themselves,

22John Infiam

Art and Cultarc 1966

Assemblager leathercase containingbook,letters,photostats, etc,,and labelled vlals filled

l lquids.1.9 x28.2 x25.3(3%x 11% x 10)The Museum of lvoden

Blanchette RockefellerFund

23Jan Dibbetts

Pegpective Conection1969

Photograph ofinstalation

24loseph l$sufr

English/Latin version1965 (bdibitionveBion 1997)

Clock, photographs andpinted texts on paperTate

Page 35: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

uE teq l 'tre Jo >1.10,^1 e sE tunof P]notr tttl,{{ Jo strrulT ?q] Pf,uortsJnb teql lJo,,!l

Surxpo.rd 'qnrp8rrs qt.S raleop rqt qlr.'rl prlErlosse rurerrcl 'rrura,1\ 3f,uar^rrl

pue ::1qan11 sey8noq (::eg rraqoa qrr.,t Suop'qrnso;q'so96r ::e1 :gr u1

tii 0[vsnvtu]lvl4t0

"sE.Pr

Jrll .re tle Jo s)Fo { Fnttrr .qt, 'uortrqrllxJ

ulltouodo.Ltltuaualll aqr Su ueduorrt salou srrl ur Jro.Lt{ qrnso) sE '.r:q,4'\

turod aq: :r 8ur.r::t s€,{\ uouturs aql'atru€trgu8rs Joulur d1:,rnep: go st,,ltr:e,up:eq eql'sererd asaqr 1e u1'(t:e 3o >l-ro,!{ aqt Jo otsj aql ur ,uoutldurrruof,,

Jo uoDur^uor.qt qrusrP ol uorlrfrTdull dq pue) uonrwro;ur ;o :3ueq:xarqr orur ,.{r4rqrssod pur uorsuot, tr;(ur or 8ur:q rurr rqr ',{rtTtqtp,r"

Jo plo.prr.p:rp.noyaq rsnlp:rp:rd spunos 1:rg Surlqd:ep:o::: adtr t 3o Suusrsuor 1.ro,,wr: 'adry

do5 p:rnpo:d peq urng url puu uapsrue1 lrl11 '996r se dpe sy (92'39)

areds uonrqrqx::qt ur spunos:q: Surser. pue peg Surdqd '3urp:o:a: 'doo1

snonunuol e ql,r rop:o::r:drt r pa:rqrqx. aqs ralrl :ua.rrdswrr dlarelduror

ouo '1:qc1 rilor:lduror ruo 'ullg Jo sllo.r o,{t] 'puofrs II] ur pu€ :spunos

Suuuasa.rd:.r,s8ur,nerp, pardorotoqd's.r-rnuulg otyny.Lo{ suou;soduro3 p:,uoqsJqs rsrg:qr uI ulsllEnrdJluol ur srsu.rt uaruo,4{ Jo alo.r lpea aqr llqdruaxa or

uJl€l uouo ?.rl suonnqr.uuof .sori.4 'lo1zo;1 euu.r:r13lq pue JlJsrulq qtnso)dq yo,,u papnpur s.rloqs qtog ):o ,!\ag ur sarrds patua: lpre:oduet ur y.ry

yutto1,tr pue uy tqdtouodotllrouoltr suot:l grqxa :q: pesrueS.ro rJlr.rso) '/96r uI.PaPE.rJ 3J3,r\

s8urqr qrrq,,w ur uorDJ.lp ?rit srt€Jrpur ,{oqs srauqf,og 1nq ',tu:}rualour, p.ruEue se tsrx. tou prp ,l.re prudaruo3, 996r uI 'aurorrq prq ltrt Jo ]ro,,!{, rqt trql

Eurqt atturrur:t:pur Jql tsgruErlr 3le!u 01'ttv st lxwa4lq oi tuatytr Quassata1tr r1trs7a114qlsy1np6 yua sSnnatq 7utyto14 'alru aqr 'rsEal lou 'pue leydsrp 3o epour

,JlrT-trr, rqr ql,,!{ prurquror srql Jo II€ :tu:t1l rtrrqdnp or pasn rardororoqd aqrgo rur::3trp r pur ueld :oog sftole8 oqt Jo uorsllllur llt se 1:,r sr 'a8r3 uqo{,{q :rors r put 'suortEJnJIEtr

IErDEuraqtru 's.lro,\ur or 'ppr-r{ uoq pue ttrr11e1

1o5 se q:ns slsure dg s:rP::1s 8ur1;o,'vr pue surer8trp uorS pa8uer qrrq.t

Page 36: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

exhibition was, and what it was that an artist d;1. Siegelaub challengedconventional expectations by staging exhibitions that reversed the normalrelationship between the work on display and the catalogue. In the Januarlexhibition of ry59, while some physical examples of work were shown rn

temporarily rented premises, the real site of the exhibition was the catalogue,which in Siegelaub's terms now became'primary' rather than'secondary'information. In a notable shift, artwork was now being conceived as'informatiori,

which could be circulated more e{ficiendy through the mediumof texts and photographs than through the transportation of physical objects.

It was the work of such artists that stimulated the claim that the tendency

uniting the Conceptual avant-garde was the 'dematerialisation'of

the object ofartr a thesis advanced by Lucy Lippard and John Chandler in Arx Magazine inFebruary 1968. The most literal example of this strategy of

'dematerialisatron is

afforded by the rvork of RobertBarry. Barry began with smallmonochrome canvases hung atdisparate points on the gallery wall,which in exhibition thereforeappeared to bring into play the spacebetween them. From here he movedto wires. (lntttled of 1968 is a nylonthread weighted down with a steeldisc, hanging vertically, and almostinvisibly, from the ceiling. The wireswere about as far as solid mattercould be taken into the realm oftransparency. The next step, logical1yenough, was gas.The lnert Gas Seriesof 1969 took in gases such as neon,xenon, and helium. The text forHelium reads:'Sometime during themorning of March !, ry69, z cubicfeet of helium was returned to theatmosphere'. Tellingly, the event is

recorded in a photograph (fig.27). Other, yet more'dematerialised'works byBarry include Telepathir Plrrr,'something close in space and time but not yetknown to me', and the assertion that'for the duration of the exhibition, thegallery will remain closed', a work that was simultaneously'shown at severaldifrerent venues in the USA and Europe.

Lawrence Weiner made the point ,borrt th. obsolescence of physical objectswith tather more aplomb. He had originally been a painter, producinggeometrically striped or monochrome, shaped canvases in the early to midr96os, but he had also performed some more'exploratory'sculptural workinvolving the removal rather than the installation of material by blowing holesin the desert with dynamite. From 1968 Weiner began presenting a series ofenigmatic propositions relating to similar kinds of actions.These included,'One

hole in the ground approximately r'x r'x r'. One gallon water based paint

25Mel Bochner

Wotking Dnwings andother Visible Things onPaper not NecessarilyMeant to be Viewed asAtt7966

Four identical looseleafnotebooks with thesame 100 Xerox copiesof studio notes, workingdrawings, and diagramscollected and Xeroxedby the artist, displayedon four sculpturesIan0sBinders: 30 x 28 x 10(LL%x 7 I x 4 \Sculpture stands 30.5 x63.5 x 91.4( 1 2 x 2 5 x 3 6 )courtesy 0f theSonnabend Gal lery,New York

20

Christine Koslov

lnformation No Theory1970

Tape recorder andstatementCourtesy ofthe artist

Robert Barry

lnert Gas Series(Helium)i From aMeasured Volume tolndefinite Expansion1969

0n l\4arch 4 1969, inthe lvlojave Desert inCalifornia, 2 cubic feetof helium was returnedt0 the atmospnerePhotograph courtesythe artist

Page 37: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

aql'dlllsloqlnE tnsD]E JEuollrPell Jo ]o rJEJJPueq Jo suollut^uol uo

sJrlJ.r 1.ro,,!{ Jo :(L{1 rJr{trJN'lndlno sq Jo .lof, oql .lrunsuotr ol PJllurluol J]!Eq

rrqtJ8ot qJlrl,4{ 'sBuI^r€rP IlE.{{ arll uo ]lEqrua ollnoqe se^I Pu€'(ot'8g) ruII]

3uros .loj ssJnDn.us JEInPow FuoIsu.lulP-3aJql iuDnPo.ld uJ0q Ptrl llll!\J-l'.teJ reqr Jo rrrurun s aW s awo{yy ut ,rJv ]erudaruo3 uo sqde.r8E.rtd, snl

paqsqqnd:tr16a1 1og uaq,,u 1,96r ut pa:eadde tsrg :rueu t st ,:re prudaruo3,

N0[l.l3d]u

duurg aq or suaddrq oqe 11'r:e pn:daruo3 Jo sPWq aql

rr ror{lnE lsruraporu oqr 3o otg agr 3o rrurrodrruo.rr ut sluasa.ldf,r pu.ng-fitg ' yontpuot

Surpuadrur paur8aur snp :og ;oqderaur

e sr uras :q drur aruanbas rrqdtrSorogd aq1

Jlasunl rsruE Jqr Jo arue.readdesrp pruuaaa aql

oru or palsaSSns Dalqo r:e agr 3o arue.rtaddrsrp

aql ol arueJ3js.I I€nuuuol Jrll, 'alol,{ llEulY'(62'By') 696r p 1u1.t;cg-lp5 srq 'uonesqeualeurap

uo qtr sltuly qrre;q ur srnrro totrre,r qsry8uguV 'suonrtsgrutru pn:daruo3 lueur aprsSuop

pa;a,roq 'uortdunsuor put ssoy8 ot :ruetsrsal jorrr p:aua8 slr sr 1ea,r se l:qenb rrptu;ou lpq8qs

slraJntlnl-rJtuno) laPl.!{ alll Jo JPlllule lltq-prel .qf 'rusruorssardxg lrrr:sqy 3o suonrata

urrsduorq arlt ruor; rno {lraqt palJ€ur pueso56r aqt ur peq oBrJ punoJ€ rsoqr P.qrosqp os

lEr{t rnounq IE)zzrnb e ol parlp loo: ua7 rtqr

Jo alEJt turr; E tla; aq uEl e:allt 'lft Jentdaluo3

lyre: Suolo,rord-rq8norJl tsour aqr Jo:ruos u1 'Suqladruor l Jp€ur reqr .pnlrre aqr Jorpnul uaqt r,uE, arlt :ou ;r 'le1 uraraqa'Sutqlou

lsourp op ol SururaJs JJnI \ sTo,4{rre puesrsu.rts Jo arnl€u aql lnoqe suottdrunsse prtuar.ruos jo stIqrIT arll paqord ::urarq'syo,,vr d1.rea

asaqr uI ]suft r9r Jo PuEq arll lE .q or .^eq rou

prp uouesr]Err tEqt 'pasqtar llprtslqd ::a,u :r gr'la^oaJour puy',t.re ;o 1oa,i, jo sutts :rp lo(ua

ot JapJo ur prsrl"ar lle:rslqd aq or a,ttq rou prp

r1 eapr aqr ur lr1 ,yo,u, aqr 'fts or s rrtla'rynqaq tou prJu {ro.,!{ ;rll t p.reruqrj aq,,l€rtl lJo,{\ IiI'z lro,^1 aql Dn]lsuotr

lru:srt:e rq1 r,:ropu arrr.redu: :r1t rpr,4{ ru.ruJrers tlJrlo Jo ru::rurur:druo>teq: se,n ':nSopttr r|ranruls qnrl:3:r5 ur paqsrlqnd ts.rg se,,n rr ull,^{ 'sPrt^{uo

696r urog srrll or p:l1dde rourollrrqr rsr.ru aqa'(696r 'l9o ruaualelg),:snur 8n.r e u.ro:; p,roruar a:enbs y :(gz Bg :896I 'Izo ru.!uatr5) ,yp,'r'r r uro:; preoq

ge,n:o rarseld 3o p,4{ rJoddns ro Sulqrel Jrp or p^ourr.r,,9t x,,9f y :rr Suqprsur

uEqt :lllr.r IEIral€u 8ut.r.oul:r utSog osp rauraA\');o,& JrI]rra srq uo dn 3ut1tt6'(g96r 'l,ro ruaua:etg) rrer &;ds yoso:e€ prEpuets e luo.rj.roog aql uodn l1:ra:rp

rured drrds 3o salnurur o,na,l(g96r 'oro tuauattrs) ,l]orl srqr orur pa.rnod

Page 38: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

constructions and drawings alike are fabricated by assistants working withinthe parameters of LeWittt instructions.The opening of LeWittt'Paragraphs'has come to constitute the canonical statement of a general conceptualistapproach:'In conceptual art the idea or concept is the most important aspectof the work. When an artist uses a conceptual form in art, it means that all ofthe planning and decisions are made beforehand and the execution is aperfunctory affairl As he declared,'the idea becomes a machine that makes theart', Lewitt was, however, careful to steer his notion of Conceptual arr awayfrom any suggestion of intellectual aridrty,by offering qualification. ,r.r.h

",'Conceptual art is not necessarily logical', and'The ideas need not be complex.

Most ideas that are successful are ludicrously simple'. In fact for LeWitt, as heemphasised in the slightly later'sentences on Conceptual Art' of ry69,'Conceptual

artists are mystics rather than rationalists. They leap toconclusions that logic cannot reach. Rational judgements repeat rational

judgements. Illogical judgements lead to new experiencejThis suspicion of therational should not be surprising. After all, rationalism in the guise ofplanning, systems theory and scientific analysis, was being enlisted ro prosecutethe war inVetnam. LeWittt exhaustively repeated variations of lines, cubesand geometry in general seem at one level to do nothing so much as point tothe insanity inherent in the obsessive pursuit of the rational. As RosalindKrauss has argued, his strategies owe more ro the maddeningly obsessiverepetitions of Samuel Beckettt characrers than to scientific rationalism (letalone to Pentagon planners).

This interest in repetitive, mantra-like strategies, pursued through andbeyond obsession to a strangely srill kind of meditation on rime, consrirures anotable trend within the overall range of Conceptual art, a rrend which,moreover, seems to have spanned the continents. LeWitt was working inAmerica. Roman Opatka, an artisr of Polish descent residenr in Fran-ce, began

28Lawrence Weiner

AJO XJb removatnthe lathing or suppottwall of plaster olwallboad tom a wall1968

Installation photographalthe January 5-31J969 exhibition.The SiegelaubCollection and Archivesat the Stichting EgressFoundation,Amsterdam

29Keith Amatt

S e lf-B u ri a I (Te I ev i si o nlnterference Project)1969

Nine photographs onboardEach panel 46.7 x46.7(18%x78%)Tate

Page 39: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

i:

Page 40: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

to paint a canvas in 1965.The canvas was painted blact, r95 cm high and r35 cmwide. In the top left hand corner, with a brush laden with white paint, heinscribed tlre 6gure'r'. Next to it he inscribed 'z'.

The sertes One to injnitlcontinues. By the time of the exhibitioo Clobal Conceptualsrrr in r999, Opalkatwork featnred there bore the title ft96r76-t9t66t j.The artist speaks thenumbers in Polish as he paints them, and the audio tape is a component of thework.The German artist Hanne Darboven, whose early career received supportfrom LeWitt, began working with number sequences in the mid-r96os. Herinstallations characteristically took the form of shelves containing largevolumes, the pages of which were sorrtetimes covered in hand-written number

sequences, oI sometimes containedonly one; as in the work consistingof all the days of a century: 365volumes of roo leaves each (fig.3r).The pages of the first volumeconta in a l l t hc f i rs t -o f -Januar ies , rhcsecond, a1l the second-of-Januaries,and so on up to all the thirty-first-of Decernbers. In an exhibition atthe Konrad Fischer gallery inDtisseldorf during r97r, one volumewas displayed, open, in sequence,each day between r ]anuary and theend of December.

Best known of this'genre',perhaps, are the dare paintings ofthe Japanese artist On Kawara,begun on 4 January r966.These toohave continued, all slightly different,all hand painted, ever since, eachbeing accompanied by a page from anewspaper of the day in quesrion(fig.32). Related series by Kawarainclude postcards mailed toindividuals in the art worldrecording the time at which he gotup ('I got up . . .'), or whom he met

on a particular day ('I met . . .'); and perhaps most poignantly,'I am still alive -

On Kawara'.This is the kind of rhing rhar ffies the patience of the sceptrc.Ironically, in the face of such manifestarions of Conceptual art, one can dolitde other than echo Michael Friedt claim made in respect of modernisrpainting: if someone doesn't feel they are'superb paintings', then'no criticalarguments can take the place of feeling it', What it means to feel convinced ofthe significance of ar endless series of numbers, or a wall fuIl of closed booksthat you know contain nothing but dates, or a minutely diferentiated series ofcanvases, is a fair question, Insofar as there is an arswer, it perhaps lies in therealm of our responses to the sublime, a sense of our hmitation in the face of

30SolLewitt

Cubes/Haff off 7912

Enamel led a uminium160x305.4x233(63x 130%x91%)Tate

Hanne Daboven

Boals. A Century t97I

Installation photogf aphof books and booi,shelfMuseum of lvodem Art,

320n f€wara

3 Date Paintings: lan.15, 1966 (Ihis paintingitself is January 15,1966);ian. 18, 1966

Jan. 19, 1966 (Fton123 Chanbes SL to405 E 13k St)t966

Liquitexon canvase a c h 2 0 . 5 x 2 5 . 5 x 4(8x 10x 1%)staatsgalerie Stuttgan

Page 41: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

is,,!\olloj t€q.{l !.ratt€J aql

Jr puv iag u?J rJ€ 8un{r Jo spuDl aqr augapar Surop ..re nol req.,t saop lutod

tErl,tr tE 'rO auE aq ol asear Surop are nol req,u saop tutod teq^\ tE Pue 'ttrll

Dn.usqo 'le Palool aq ol l.Ie sE^\ rrE rslulaPotr^{'lJt ]€nlo3ruoJ A]]Ea slunEq

uons:nb leql Tzar Suroq uo peatsut stsrsur pue uontlduratuol Jo rtr€ srll

sarnlqe :eqt trr pnsrl Jo ).1o,^{ € qll4{ patuo;;uof Jq ot sI tr trqu ;o uons:nb

aql asrc.r sua[o.rd asaqr 'raqraSor uayea's;adtds,,rrau;o sutunlor Sutstt;a,lpe

aqt pu? 'laaJts lto .qr ur s8urp:toq sr qxs '&i,rD:e r:e qtr,,r Pat€rloss€lou lJsnoraa:d salrs ur snrnesaqlaql ruor; saurua pareld pue s:elso:oqd

aqr;o aueld-puno.r8 qrelq aqr para(er qlnso;1 sreal,tr3 :x.u aqr:a^o'lSalerls srq;o uorr€srpllp?r raqtrn; E ur pue Surrurtd;o oqra tueserd-1ns

eqt 3o uorrruSorar ur 3r sy '(r'3g) ,l;oaqt,

',uoltEtu.sa.rdr.r, ',tlafqo, ',8ulu€aur, -

tJy uloporu Jo sru€ls pue a.rru€u Jqt tnoqE atvqap aqt ur su.rar da1 arlt 3o dttru

Jo suourugJp lr€uou)rp Jo lrElq uo alrq,u 'slt:sotoqd :,urt8au :spro,,t't 3o lnq'1p rr l:a8aur Jensr,l ;o tou Sunsrsuor sTo,tr p:zrs-SuDurt d'suou8usa,ru1 stq lotslu aqr parrgrrlxa aq 1,96r u1 'r:e pnrdr)uo3 Jo suolr auoJaq e^Erl reqr qro^l

1o sar.ras v ur ared aqr Surr.ro; 'a8pa raprul e peg q:yo:dde s grnso; qdoso{

srs rvNv

le,,ur raqlo arp Swuror ssaupeur rsquder tno-pa,lro oq E sraJrul:rarsstd op1-ua7;r sE :aruatuas aj4 pasodur-;1as go purl € Jo 'argul€s

Jo puDle Suraq ol asop sr srsurt asaqt Jo >lJo.r{ aql p.re8a; a,,ur.raqlaq,,n uous:nb u:do uesr :l qQyesl a;rT:1T) uor:rrynsnlu.ro srr uo 3ur>pt dgenruo,ra 'drdrua dpua.redde

'sse1turod lpu:rrddr 'uor:rnpord 3o u:o; E rlrns punorE ajrl rnol a:tual ol

I sr rErlr\\ uoEf,npord-st-uonrnpo;d ;o ayr,'[r ssalpua aqr '1.ro,u aurl-dyqurasse

3o llSpnrp :qr a1q Surglauros :aurqgns-rlue Jo pur>J e se ua>lEr rq Ila,,rr sE

rsnlppor poloaa sr req,n 'lps:a,tuo3 lrrap 8ur:rpqe,r lur 3o aruasqt atalduoraqr trq alqrssarreur a:oru aqr lluo parapuar 'uollolap

Jo asuas f,Ils€uoure Jo ss.ullts .qt tsurc8e dn sagrra; punor dprp pr,t:t ssal ro ..rou 'rnruag ssa]lo aJour sJuo uJrl,lr Arpunq urn:a: e 30 se IIJ.4{ sE :rruea)o aqt 'ssaussllpunoq

Page 42: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

,l ,, ,''', It,,.t,.:i,

33

vol .1, n0.1, lv lay 1969

Published in Coventry

England,"to i,hich address all mss and let'ters snoiU be sent.Price 7s.6d U K, ff'l .50 USA All rights reserved

Printed in Great BritainPrinted in Great Britain

Page 43: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

€ s€.&r s>lro.&\ f1.rea rratlt;o ruergru8rs tsoru ogr Suoury '(tt'8g) real 8ur.uoy1o;aqt ptun :eaddr tou plp a7vn7un1-uy pu.rno( aqt Jo anssr tsrg aqt pue '996r prun

pardope tou se^r rru€u aqt q8norp 'L-996r ur rarpaSor aurer 'llarrnH ploreHpue a8pr.rgurrg pl^EC 'ul^tpFg

Ia€qrrry 'uosuDltv lr.ra1'a8enSu€-1 € lIV Jo

uorle.raua8 tsr5 llt paurro:I or1.tt asoql lrr8ay rrrrdurtrpnq, rsrpreS-tue^€ aql

Jo IerrtrJl ssrl ou tng 'rurofrg p€q usru.rrporu trq.{{ uro5 tuaraJrp ^lur€rr?)'JtrrlJ€Jd

I€f rlrJ) Jo urJoJ ,trau E atntrlsuol trldrur lBrl^{{ aas ot surnJ asaql

q8noryr >po^L ol ue8ag'puey8ug d.nua,ro3 ur prsEq lry1rp1 'dnor8 a8rn8utl

n lJV rLII'oue:8ua.r. e qtr.{r pouJnro; o8en8uel 'ursru.ropour Jo surnr rqt ur

'^roN'ur Jo uorsuaurp a.,ulruSor agl passarda.r ptq rusruJapoy4l'arrlre.rd,1a,tay

-rtarlr, ro ',JapJo-puofrs, Jo urJoj r sB.4{ papaau ag ot pauaas terl^\.p?ruoguor

llrr"t'tbrp" 19 ol .rapro ur ,8urop,.ro ,8ur1eur,3o spoqraur aldurrs uerpa.rour pe;rnbal teql sanssr 'tuo5uof ot sanssr alg€prol€un JurElJq 'J1€ur Jo opor pasoddns st&r tsrlJe ur lrqt s€..!{ lr 1ELI,I{ pur 'tsrlJr rJE ag ot sr,{t lr req,1\

'se.tt tJ€ trq.lr olur 'pa su'trtnbw u€ pu€ uJsruorlrnpal lsruJapour

.Jo wty sryd au

-ayt llsnoauerlnurrs :1rc pnldaruo3 Jo uortnlolr aqr ur rurod

,{a>1 t paruasardor 1.ro.n s,qlnso) 'ssolrlltruoN 'tr€ Jo lx?iuor aq) ur patuas::d

uaqlt lyuo sntets r{fns salarqf€ rr rerp 3urn3.re lysnoauerlnurrs alrq^4. uorlrsodo.rd

4lQauu uE Jo sntets aqr rre Jo >lro.4r, e ro.1 Surturep ur pa^lo^ur Aualsrsuorur -arp

patetrrpur auJoqso Jrtrd 's.4{EH pJureluoJ Suruosea; s,qtnso) leql tno turoo ol

prnb uaog o eLI srrlrr,&r lualadruor llerrqdosopqd ruanbasgnS',,,1r€, tdaruoraql Jo suortrpunoj 3qt orur l.unbur u€ sr tr teqt rg plno.l{ tre pntdaruor

Jo uortruyap ,,tsarnd,, aqt,'satu,tt qtnso) sv ',saprs aarqt seq alduer.u V olunle lSolornrt r 'uortrsodord prrrlyeur uE sr tr€ Jo );o.&r aql .l)a5r uI 'tr€

Jo>lJo,t{ E sI s,fl t€LIt tlaJe aqt ot uortrsodord r 'sr rap :rrrg:E Ieuortrsodord r sr tr

regl 'srra(go;o 8ur1eu aql sa.unba;.r:3uo1 ou tr€ t€qt sr t€ selrrr€ arl rurep aqllqdosoyqd Fuorrrprrr Jo pur arp 8ur1.reur se srslpue rnsrn8ur1 sp.re8ar osp

aH 'dru€qtrnc alurs tlr Jeuortur^uoJ JIe sttJtal pu€ strtaqlsa€ pu€ lJ€ ua?^\taguortfurtsrp € strasse qtnso) 'rr u1 'rurod ttqt ot dn apeur tsrtrc Fntdaruo3

e lg luauarets Itrrtrrollt rarsuatxa tsotu aql aq ot turep auros s€q,lgdosopq6;ru€ try'druupnq pue rprequro1 Woq Jo Jrurngur aqr p:3pa1.uonpe

aq qrrqA ur lxat e'luuouauralul oryws leurnof ogr go uor]rpa 696r ;agorrg arpur paqsqgnd aq lessa aqt urog rroddns Frrtrroaqt p;.ra.ttod tsour rrarlt palrar?r

suo4v74sa,ru| s,qtnso) 'strgure8 saoS-Surqrlue 'lsrp:e3-tue,re 3o sle,u uappoJl

-lorlr 11.4e3 rqt.4{ou lg a:a.n teqrlr Surtrsr,r-a.r lldrurs tnoqtr.&r ursruraporu puolagt{et*e rc13un1ooy asoql uo trrdun ue perl teqt 'asu a,re8 rl rpnl-lt ol s8urrurcd

Fnrre eqt se qrnru sr 'aydurexa Ieturrurtuosun s.rpr€r{ura1 se.,lr tI -esla Sunpl.ra,ra

s aqa Sunplrr^r pue tJe-se-tre sr r.ry'8ulp auo sr tr leqt sr tJE tno_geles or 3un{r auo aqJ.:rrJgnr rlrsnlfxr rr€ Japun paaraluoJ aJa^{ - uornnpo.rdar

rrqdr.rSoroqd ur rlgrsr^ur lla.Lrrraga pur uorltlduraruor pa8uolordlg lluo paltalal frtsrJall€J€rlr E - euroJrpouour atrnb tou tnq lsourp ,so96r

arp;o s8urrured >pe1g paunr lyaug srH'tre tlensqe uruop-pend llssalpnr€ qtl.&t srllllod Suru-r;a1 tua8rsue;tur Sururgruor Jo feal l1a11pn arp paur;o;;adtprtr{uraU 'sJrtur urlS.raguaarg agr lq parou8r galr, 111o.16'ursru.rapou )rtsrtre

Jo as€l-tnurl r luasa.rda.r lSoy algereldrur rraqt lq s8urtured asorl l 'tpr€r{ura1

py uro5 pa^uep sr aserqd arlt roC'rusruraporu or tradsar rpr,u buapuar snp

Jo arnteu snon8rgure rqt ot slurod',eepl s€ €apl se trv 'altrtqns s,qtnso)

Page 44: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

long series devoted to investigating the implications of postulating ever morecomplex objects as possible candidates for the status

'work of art'. The

important phrase in that last sentence is'investigating the implications'. For theclassically Duchampian strategy of 'nomination

had become, if not exactlydiscredited, then redundant, otiose. After a certain point, there is no'point'inclaiming another snow shovel, another pile of twigs on rop of Ben Nevis,

IfiOUSEN -WOqD flrcE

'li is $!.ltlhought,5.d lda.e $y 6!.lry,ilitly $ougnttat wb.ne njghr cr{ 6e .ttmdtug use ot a €.o ts bsic - 6d. ro &de$d'x;

* heed ro htrwhar i b to b€ Lsro b 6n Lad inat &Mqthi3 apprises us ol whai h B not ro be x- nor to b a. x .8d wka leal. . . . it b the rrgafve ss rhat w*6 rhe [email protected] js, a deii.iessBe a{.chr. lo ihe a$e4io. &t sofr6ti.g i! cal, a real su4-adsuch. only i^ 1k ligat ot a specfic q in 6i.h ft migbt b6, or n:shtbv€ beer. rol r€1- A r*l dlck ditteB Irom be simob ? dud'o&!nth6r n is lsed to elcluds Edoos *6ys ot being rct a r€l dud - M adomry. a to, a pitui€, € decq, tc ; ad norwer I do.1*neiudhowro hke lheassedion 6at ia saldlducl u.l6ss l*.o*lutwtui-on th.t oadi.ula.oc€s'or, tle co@br hsd I i. nhd ro *dde. . .

{fte) ludis ot -r€al' is .ot ro @rtribda postilely b ffe 6€@sa

sarion ol6rfhi.o. bd ro sdude p6d* ry d &d9 rot @l'ardrhese eys are bo6 nude.ds iq Fdicob. thds d fthgr. d li.bleto be qul€ diftared tor lni4s ol d'flered hds I is mG ldediry dgenoral l$..tion cohbined w$ immense die6iryin sFdic appli€tions which glv$torh6word'real'se, st ikst sigh!baffng teatu.e oihavi.g .€trer o.e sirgl€ 'n3anins,'nor

Fi 6mbi9unt a .um&r ol

Joh As!S.'Snse and tusibilb-

34

When AftitudesBecome Fom

Installation photographof exhibition at theInstitute ofContemporary Arts,London, 1969 (withVictor Burgin'sPhotopath in lhe cenlrcforeground)

35Keith Amatt

Trouser Word Piecets72

Photograph and textEach panel100.5 x 100.5(39%x39%)Tate

36John Hilliard

Camera Recording itsown Condition(7 aperturcs, 10speeds,2 mirrorc)197I

Photographs on card onPerspex276,2 x 183.2(85%x72%\Tate

another brainwave, as a work of art. Atkinson and Baldwin (the name Art &Language'not yet being assigned as'author'of these early works) postulatedsuch'objects'in rather more systematic fashion, in ascending orders ofcomplexity, to raise questions about the ontology of art. The items in questionincluded: a column of air (r.e. matter, in gas-state); Oxfordshire (i.e. anirregular, spatially bounded area; but what of the third dimension? How deepl);the French Army (i.e. a complex entity made up of various men and machines,

44

-

Page 45: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

rnrt€urt 'sseru tng ',lqdt.rSoroqd-t.re, tou pue lgdetSoroqd se.tr asaqr

Suoun: tsouraroC',Jlrstl lrru.raporu lg algtyt.te aptu srltllgt pue sanbturpat

uounuo) Jsor,[] uoll€ultserur prtpet LIII.4{ ateurlu€ ol JarllEJ lng 'os oP ol

tou l;rssarau l]"rt]otg" s€.&{ rI rrtJ uI, rt€rit utqr arol d ',ltr.'rrsnpx: pyn8-ge:r

ur prroor sJrtrlgrsuas pue sllDIS go uorttstnbre arp g8no;rp :1doad aqt tuorj

J]?sruo ote.redos ol l.rtssarau ra8uol ou, s€at tr op:t8-lut-te ]ttItIJr aqt JoJ leqlsr tu:run8rr srH'tuaruJlJnlfe sl.rt pnrdaruo3 ol ,l€rluassa, s€,'!{ lI ttqt P?rule]r

seq p16gal rrrJ uI'spuq Surlrt^ Jo stxrt rltl.4{ uolrrunluot ur pasn Sutag

uauo 'slsnf,r pnrdoruo3 roj rrl^rp lo1 e uaag tsly oqt ruog p€LI fqde;3oroq6

-tEl-oroHd

'(lf'8g) ltlderSoroqd papunorrns reql .ssaupntrtJ, pu€ ll.trrra(go jo surrcp aql

rrynrrl,rcd ur pue 'uoltttuasa;da; IEnsIA lnogt ssausnotlsuol-Jlas JrPI.&\ € sJIIAUI

uoutpuoO unto sfl7uty.rntaf, nuwp7 Epr€l]llH ugof 'pa8t8ua 'tutruour l.ral rer,lr rt'sr.u ?q qrlq,e{ u} ss:ro.rd aqr Jo rrn.lrt rurorag of ra.t{rll oqr pagadruot lypnt.rr^,r

suonrnrsur Fnrxar prrunour-lp.&\ *13:ffl '(5['3y) st.,n

lsrlJ€ ,FJJ, r teq,{t tnoge suI€JJ JsIuoJr ^lsnoruullnurls

pur aslpue ol unsnv '1'{.raqdosoyrqd proSxg arp lqrxar prrllpur llSurpunosrr t >loot lt€urv 'roltlrads aql

Jo alor aqt Pur tsrtre elll Jo JIor rtll 'rr€ Jo >110.&L rLIl Jo

?rnteu rqt tnoqE suortsanb pJsr€J sILIt Jo qrnw 'sraqlo

PuE urtretr l-8rt.r3 1aeglr141 'urSrng rolrln'ra>l€zal5 uqo{

'lltury rltra;1 'aEtnEuE-I E try lq po.rcaddt >lro^{ pawg

-oroild pue rx?r ;o a8ut; apl.4{ E 'astqd .rar1-rea atp ur

rng 'ra1der1t txru 3qt UI Passnf,srP rq IIl,&1 qlrq^u 'orrrrtrd

Flrtrloo-ltrntlnr I€)IP€r Jo >lro^4{lau raPI.4{ € olul

r,rt puolag r,{oru ol sol,6r oqr Jo JIErI puolas rLIt uI pu€

Jlastr uortrurtsur trt arp 3o anblrul t otntltsuor or ut8ag

>IJO,1^ JJ]II SILI] JO LITNW 7OOf5'AFI] EIIJJqIuN JTI] ]API]NuortrlnPs lrr Jo uortnlrlsul rlil ultpl^{ >lJo.4{ I€rrllrtr roj

sarrs 8urpr,r.o.rd re po.utt olrtertrur pasrg-a8en8u€-I A tJVur ot patelrr q)rg1y' 'V!.LisO

Pl|Je.LaPiulu['anssL soL6t-pt.rt

TIITII-rIITI€=III-il.qIr-ilFw,@rrtwwffiI*#WW,WIIE€Effsi;:#Gff6ry3ry,.*'*.'

wffiqu!+€F.#{r-str;A#r:ii-'J:. I'

€@ffi,8*5.-

aqt ur ratel lpr13r1s pu€ 'saurs dno.rg l.rod.tta51 a'qt'uy ytuQauy papnpw tra'11'uortrraua8 SurS.raruo ut lg soldrutxo paseg-o8allor snolr€^ pse'sytowawaq pue

lu.iuoC pawg-uopuo-I JLII ot '696r treynur &luaro3 ur pagsqgnd rtg'a7an7uu7-itv urorJ pa8ue.r ?s?LiI'potnqr.rrsp flpuuo;ul sr?rpo 'paqsqqnd llpn-raruruor

ruros 'sleurnol Jo lrar-re,t rpr.u r sed{ aJllt 'suortrgrqxa ol uolllppt u1 '.real aurts

)rp ut tlv lz'al{ roleu s l.ragtg prc.nlt11 oqt put zL6r ur ay.Lb) Jut)ry aqt {o {aung

atp 'rL6t ur aroqs 11ary t{,nye1 uossr-I ayl 'oL6r ut slLurnLls aayl sE rpns saldurtxo

prsnro; d1e:o1 arolu s€ IIO \ s€ (tt'8g) 596r w wtol awortg sapwul7 uafuNl

la,uns lruortru.rotur agr Surpnpur '.real lrola uopuo-I ur artld loot suoltlgqxg'stsnr€

Jo s;rgurnu rlqelaprsuotr Jo >lro,&t arp Sunergrua'soL6r l1.rea pue so96r

ate] ar{t ur alroJ p;.ra.ttod € rur€lrg trt pntdaruo3 ,prrlleut,'uletug uI'rro(go t.rt u€ Jlrstr sr urr€Itr agr Surrt8rrsaaur less: rtp r€LIr urIEIl oqr 'asel-rlull

Jo pupl E srpu€ :(Fuortrpuor arntn; e 'o'r) rra(go trr uE sr 'lutgduung 9z pu€

5z s;ogurnu 'srsnoq o.&{t uoa.{,\.tag IFA rlpgun 1al-st ogt ttqt urtlr arp l(arurr

.ra.to fir1u3p1 srr Sururerureur ral strtd lurnrlrsuor slr SurSuerp llenurruor

Page 46: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

photography. ForWall, the important precursor here was Ed Ruscha, who hadbegun his series of photobooks as early as 1961 with Twentl-Six Casoline Stations(fig.lZ), continuing wrth Some Los Angebs Apartmentq and Euery Building on SunsetStrip.Photography increasingly became used to document the varieqz ofactivities and performances that formed an ever more influential complementto more narrowly'analytical' Concepfual art. Activities as diverse as those byGilbert and George and Richard Long in Britain (fig.;S), and Robert Smithsonand Bruce Nauman in the United States all relied on the photograph toestablish their presence in the field, either in exhibitions or in the pages ofbooks and magazines. The status of all these activities was markedly unstable atthe time of their first appearance. Nauman has commented on how he spent alot of time reassessing what it was that artists were supposed to do, and that hisearly work was made out of just that activityl spilled coffee, pacing around thestudio, and the like (fig.39). As he said, the only way to find out whether it wasart was to do it. Nauman admitted that there was a great deal of confusion as itbecame apparent that art'doesnt require being able to draw, or being able to

paint well or know colours, it doesnt require any of those specific things thatare in the discipline, to be interesting'. And yet without skill andaccomplishment of somekind, there would be nothing to communicate. AsNauman put it, what was interesting was'the edge between'the two conditions.

In the mid-r96os, Dan Graham was producing works thar at the time had anextremely unstable identiqt, were hardly'art' at all, but which have subsequentlybeen accorded exemplary status in the Conceptual canon. Graham was engagedin the usual round of writing and reviewing, the hinterland of poerry and artthat constituted life in the NewYork avant-garde, forever struggling to get hispieces published. March jtst t966 consisted of eleven'lines'recounting thedistance from the edge of the known universe to Graham's own retina, via thedistances toWashingron DC, toTimes Square in NewYork, ro Grahamt ownfront door, and the sheet of paper on the typewriter. The mixture of flatliteralism and quirkily imaginative meditation on the process of looking, or rheprocess of writing, is characteristic the economy of Graham's means belyingthe sweep of the idea. In two nicely judged inversions of consumer culrure

Page 47: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

rril'usruJrPorrr Jo srsrJf aql Punlag uos€rJ IErturssa aqt tno sdurrg rurrlBrD'grl lrtsaruop l.rr.roduraluof, Jo uaaa uortrpuof, parntrr;ilrcru pue p?sr]€rrtsnpur

arll Surpaaa.r lq 'os Surop lq 'rarpra'aruatsrxa rrtgrnqns oruo ru;o; ap.re8-rue.te Surdderu puolag sao8 uorlua,trarur tq8rls lpua*dde s,rueq€rD 3o uodrur

IB)rtrrtr aqt lErlt pandJr sErl .4{oJJ seruor{IurrJotslrl il{f 'srxr str uo plJo,{taqt uJnt 'rg8rr a.rt saruetsurntrJrtr aqt J]

'uer Sunltou tsouqr Surop gr sE 'suraru

Jo runurrurru tuartddr aqt rltr^t aperu sr r;rqs roleur E ̂roq sr lw pnldarus3

InjssaDns Jo srJnlEaj aqt Jo ruo 'aJrT I€Dos u€frJrruv otuo tno slu3rlrr^orlr

trt uJoporrr Jo rrtourroq lsour lytua;edde orp uado o1 dtruroporu ropr,traql oruo lno arntdlnrs Itrululry Jo trruroJ r€lnporu arp uado or llprrreqdrua

sr puofas aql'stuaplrnba st sarnprd pur sp.ro.u teaJt ot sr auo 'arard agluo ltrtuapr ,uau e Sur.rrajuol Jo trJJa aqt r^rrl tErlt uonraHur Jo spuDl tuaraJrp

o.ru sorldde aq os Surop ur rng 'a8ed aqt ot tr ra;suert pue 'rusrprururtrAl'a16s r.rt ap.rr8-tueat Surpeay uar{l ar{t qtr.4{ prt€rfosse luaura8ue.ur ;rlnpour

aql 3>lEt o1 sr auoP l)wr ur s€q lu€qeJD ttq^\',rlrraurv roc sauroH, ar{l oturo3 or salgernp Jaurnsuor aqr 8ur1as srrors runoJsrp Jo rJ€ sJaLItO 'uroorprg

€ St rIJns slrElJP JorJJlur Jo Juros

lsroop ol dn Surpeal sdels st grns'slrlaP JorJslxo Jo JJ€ )rllos's?snorl

Jo $lueJ ParJJas Jo rJE rruos'Jnolof

lpsour pue 'sgdetSoroqd lpsoru'aJnl€u uI Itnsrl aw luud s,r[EqeJg

ui,slrolg, raqro '( "' Ccggllyv

'ffctcggw aaffggYv)rq8ra;o qrolg ur tlng;r sa1.{rs

osnoq tue.regrp arp 8uourc alqrssodsuorlerJ€a arp 1o l.reururns papor

{prnaryrldp ur iaSue.r rnolor *lt ursa>lrlsrP pue sa]rl,sraurotsn) alBlusJ

.^ /-.."Puv rIBLU Jo nr^rns e Jo sllnsJJ

arp :(,1ur4 1erca;L''' uaarD u.&E-I:5,) srnolor rorrrtxa algrssod 3o

rsrl e I(,' ' ' otr?ruo3 aql ig 'ereuos aLIJ_ :V) algrlr€^e su8rsap Sursnoq ;o a8ue;JL1l Jo Jsrl E :-lxr-l Jo spurl ]uJlUrp Jpnlrul s>JroJq rrr.lro '.{auns

1e:r8o1or:osr prr€ rJnqroJg E uaJ^t{lJq JJJqmauros ',3ursnor1-treJt, unrJaurv;o uorldr;rsop

,,oJ^or^,{t^.t^-." '^ ."'^-. .9.,1 uuqpudp ̂lprrpn]s E '_lxrl srueLleJD Jo lslsuor s>lroJq Jqt Jo Jutos ,Jovu,t ol aaJrll 'suurnlof

IElrlJrA xrs ur ,$lto]q, Pazrs ,4.lJElrrurs JnoJ-,{tJIr{] Jo s?rJ?s€ Jo stsrsuol lI :asuo8Jl€) ol pJeq surtural arard atll'alfrlJ€ aurze8ers a.raru

.rou tur.rd-t:tt raq]r3N'trrrrJoj purSuo s.urerl€JD ur turrd u€d-o^\t € se 'aJrrl sr tIse 'pornpo,rda.r llensn .&{ou sr arard ag1'anssr 1,95r t{wnue[/996r ragrua]?C aql

ut arxze?eut sl.+V uI ru.ro; palSueru ur parradde llpug uorsra^ € ptrt (auop o,ter1ot ulaas sttralord sru€qerD yo hrrur se) q8noqr ga; rrafo.rd at41'(ot'Eg) nuzag

s,udng s€ qlns autzeBertt dsso18 e ur rcadde ot prpurtur asr.&r>lr] lessa txal-oroqd

Jo puH E 'arLLz.wV.LoI sawoH sr'oqrlure aqt parnpord osle arl 996r u1taazag s,ud.wg put xag {o Maft,af, ylo;.,waN aql 'lla^rtladsa.r

'ur drls lno->llal[] ta1-reru.radns € pu€ rruaf,s?unlap altrrr uo lxal Ierrprure pareld put areds Sursrlra.Lpe >loo] rrrerl€rg 'Surddoqs pue xas Surp.re8a.r

uopuol'^Jollee,{eg6,p ,{uoqluy

7961 puePug 'Euy1etr1

fq apew aun V

tuol peqclu

8e

urepralsuv'u0rlepun0l

ssor3l Fu[r]crls oqt ]ese^rqcrv pue u0[c3ll03

qneleBerg eq.1

t96I(suoDelS eutosee nS

-,{lua\4t wou) eutolpJ'sapeeN'uotun

sqcsnu pl

LL

Page 48: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

rhetoric of self-expression, the valorisatjon of individual feeling, above all ofautonomy itself, simply do not accord with the forn of contemporary life,wherein subjectivity itself is mass produced.In ellect, that is to say, modernismis ideological with respect to modernity. It conceals the absence of its ownvalues fron lived social life. Rather than ofering a genuine transcendence ofcontingencl, institutionalised modernism functions as part of the ideologicalmask of a manipulative and disabling social order.

It goes without saying that no art can escape the framing .onditions of rtstime. But the feeling was widespread among younger artists that the price ofmedium-spe cificitv. and indeed of the related division of labour [tetwe".,modernisfartist and rnodernist critic (painters pnfuta1), contributed to an artthat had become afirmative of - rather than critical of - its social matrix.Robert Smithson, best known for his large-scale earthworks of the early r97os,also produced text/photograph pieces around this time. Smithson's influencewas powerful and fundamental to agood deal of early Conceptual art,though he himself came to dislike itar.rd to regard the restriction tolanguage as a medium as a form ofidealism. In The Monurnents oJ Passait(r967), Smithson combinednarrative, quotation andphotogtaphy in a rranyJayered butdisarmingly limpid account of aday's activity. He tells the story ofpurchasing a film and heading outby bus from NewYork with hisInstarratic camera to his birthplace,the industrial town of Passaic inNew Jersey,There he proceeds tophotograph industrial sites as ifthey were anti-heroic monuments toa dying industrial modernity (fig.4r).The banal photographs and the flatdescriptive text, encompassing the specification from the box of fllm as well asa smuggled in critique of modernist painting in the guise of a commentary ona newspaper review of an Olitski exhibition that he reads on rhe bus, allcombine to produce a multiply transgressive work: transgressive of the u..yprotocols Smithsont generation had come to find limiting in modernisn.Smithson concisely articulated the perspective informing a wide range ofloosely

'conceptual' art practices in a slightly later text of r972, written on the

occasion of the Documenta exhibidon in Germany. Doram e taV was ̂ nenonnous exhibition that has sorne daim to represent the bigh-water rnark ofearly Conceptual arr, rhe point at which it moved from being an oppositional,critical force, to a hegemonic power on rhe international art scene. Smithson'scontribution included a short text on the rheme of'culnrral confinement',noting how if the artist failed to look beyond the existing institutions ofculture, then the avant-garde artist no less than the modernist-conservativc

Page 49: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

pue 'srrtrueunq aql ssorr€ tr€drul ue peq teql saltlrolrd ur a8ueqr r1a; llaput e

sr.tt pauaddeq J^Eri or surars terll6'por:ad aql Jo srltl.roud prnrpr oqr ul rJlqs

rrs€q € tJrgrr ol uaas rq uer ,{aql 'paptdun urq,4{ lng 'snollqo ,latrtparuut

aq tou rq8ru qwuar asaqt go arueryru8ls aqt 'txatuotr Jo lno ua>l€f

'.tno salSurs ruo ttq,&t

saurrrratap lno 3ur13urs s ruo saop ruo lutol{, t€tp :deu.re3 JIoPnN :roqdosoptld

aqt tuog pardope 'urrep aSen8ut-I E lrv prrrdrga llprrrsualrertql

Jallloue uI Paul€luof ltqr ol uIlE oq ol surJas ruloo JLII'uoslJ€Ourof,

;o spunorS rqr Jo uolterrrJo;sueJl Jruos ]noqtl.4{ a.redruol ot algtssodurr,

suerur tI ttqt rtr?ts,xrpul llt Sursn.ro3 suoltrnrtsul Surlutdurollt ag1'lsoJatur JoJ ler]urtoo lsoru Jq] tno PIoq ot suraas lI s€ uoll 'lrlerualgo:d lsotu

aqr ll.reayr sr uoltelar prltlt sHI'(I) lorrtur.ro;suert, Pu€ '(-)

,algrrtduorur,'(1),a1qutdurof,

, :suolttlar a?rqt ot Surprorre rPeur s€.& uosr.redruor

srLII'raqro fta.,ra tsute8t pat€lnqtt rg ot txat qtea Pa {oll€ reqr pa&ldsrp

s€.u xapul ue 'slle,&r Surpuno.r.rns aqt uO 'dno:8 aLIt Jo sraqruoru lq pueteru

paqsrlgndun pue paqs{gnd .raqro se IIr,{\ st pu.rnol a7an7uv1-tty rtlt ruou Pallnrslxal 1,8 Surutttuor staulg€f, 3ur1g rq8ta;o dno;8 € Jo P?tslsuof, uortel]€lsul

ag1'Qaat ag ol s€.tt yo.u agr) roletrads rqt Jo arnttu aqr pue l(sxar

pue srralgo Jo prtslsuor rr) ryo,tr ar{t Jo rrnteu arp :(parnpord llaarrralor

sr.u rr) tsrtre aqr Jo rrnreu aql :stuo5 ilt uo uoltua.tuor pabualel) xa7q lg1-'(z+'Zg) >1;o.u rr.raua8 Jo puH t;o uorrnpo.rd

ar{t sPrE^\ot 'gxs se {s>lto.&L}re pntdaruol, rgDads ParPuI puolag'uollrP€rl

aprur{pra.r uerdruerpnq aqt Jo tno u.tror8 p€LI ttrlr (uolttulurou,;o sat8att;ts

rsrl€ntdrluo) snorrel ogr puolag o3 ot tdural€ snolrlgru€ u€ se^t uoltlglqxe

Apluauwoc[ zLSr arp roy parnp_91d !_o tllt e*yl E r;v rr{I (>lro^\ rrp Jo

tuatuof arp rPtlu ag ot JIaslI 'alor{l{-se-aJnl)nJls aql 'urals^s aql ',urnnurluoJ,

rr{r sr.{l .,ltoH'urrlgo.rd po.l e qrr.u salddelS rr tn9 'tuetrsrq sr a8en8wl

eql',JIrstI urnnultuoJ rqt Jo eJntlnrts-u8rs FntdrruoJ,€r1l ur,sa8uerp

Ftu?ruepun3, orlt se.&t p"r"uey4[?_Lrj_y.4N_?111-"J '€3 ry]gtj:l glq rruog,Jresoru lltoluras, aqt ot tng,sp-agruSrs Prteu8rsaP Jo uollera;Ilord arp, or

lou uJJf,uoJ Jraqt uJnl ol slsrtJe pntdatuo) JoJ alull sE^r lI 'J?rlleu',,,>lJo.4uJ€,,

ue se (.radtd qrp'a'1) t)nrtsuo) trt rrllleut ue Surleunuou uo tslsul ot qumP

ag p1no.&t lr, uaqt ',taue1d sryr Jo rl€J orlt uo Sunplut aq llge.Lraruot tq8nu,,uou lg lrafqo 1rc ut a]uls teqt ator^t uaPsrue1 Put urng 'oL6t r1'sFnPI^IPUI

,{rrrqr punort asudruor ot rruor peq ql}q l 'a8tn8uel n uV raPltr rLIt otul ,trv

I€rnarorqlro; &ano5, u,t{o rraqt parerueSlture peq uaPsutU IeW Put urng

uBI pur 'oL6t ur. rotlpa uttrIraruv aurolag peq qrnso) gdaso{ 'dno;8 qq18ug

aqr pauro( peq uorqsnx al€C put uor8urlp4 dqrq4 'rrruel}V aqr Jo srPrs qtog

uo .uou a,utrr 'dno.r8 a8tn8utl n uV PrPutdxa-rPmu aqf ;o uorfednlloard

urElu ar{t rrrrrraq uoltlPuor slqt BuIssaJPPV'luaruauguof u.{to sll aurofaq

ol pauelerJrlt uolttntls ap.re3-lue,te aqt Jo sseuurdo {ta,t aqt 'sol,6r f1.rea agr lg

)H0Nl

'uroPaag Jo suorsnlll ?lelu u€rll raqlBr

luarueusuoJ illt rsollsrP ol Jrllag ag Plno.tt lI,'snxau Fnloeluor-ltf,rllJf eloq.{{

ar{] Jo soqla oql silltrnol leql as€Ild t uI 'Parraa€ uosqlrurs sv'ulaql oP or lulq

or uo,tr8 arqd aqr ur ,slrlrr aprrl q8nor srq 3urop, rt.r l.rore;ogey t otul P?urnl

IroA /v\oN 'fiollee

ueurp00e ueuen

\Y,6Zx%6t)9l x l0I rlceo

preoq u0 palunoursLldedolotld pue

]xsl paluuo :sleueo oMl

1-996Iecueuv )ol sawoH

usqerc uec

w:l9vd ll8noc rNl/v\olloi

Il0 MaN'lele/v\lseM

ouoredS Jo ̂sa}]n03

sqderto]orld rnoloc

ua^alo l0 orlollrod

oL6r-L/996rsqdetfolorl4

lnoloJ ua^aB uo.ll(tzx0z)I9x809

tq?!a Jo uotltPl

L96l ploSoolseA4 u asnn08IeilV un4oJql aelJoJ

usuneN ecru€

6t

Page 50: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

s€n€NAoe lr_ i --:

"#is"hd_ [i_lF r , ' - i - " i ' lt - t ; I . +L I I

l|omes forAmericaD. GRAIIAM

c.dsncjt P!.k

New Cl|y P.rk

i 1 3 ( 0 n n L i r \ . r l ' c r

' p , r ) j ( L r l l r r i d r r L . o n t o t \ o l t r v r l r

\ n u i i ! o , l t E D c n i L r . ' ! ! 1 L t t r q \ o q lq . { ^ r h i l d o \ ! D r { t i x , r r u n i d F , F . t , .' i t ! . k ) ! t r i l k r 1 r i d

i , , t ' r r . ( t , , i , t r

i l f i r $ \ , r q l

{ r t r n n ! l L l o , q , ' r ! l ( ' , r n r . " i -r ! l " r r . t - I '

' " . . " ' * l i . . . - ,L n r i r \ i , L r , , ' 1 , l l r ! \ , r $ r 0 , r i r ^

$ n a , r n o , q . r r i { , - i r , L i L . u i ( h r

' \ , . " t l ' o $ l , q l ' l \

h n r ( \ ! n h r l F r s s i i c $ ! ! n i q , , r r " ! i r 1 , , , rN h d . r r r i \ r r t i ] l e \

r,.,nr! !w.ic oi,.i,,!..s' ri, rlfi ,, , <r,r

r i , n . n [ n ( r L ] R ! r . ur d i l l ( l o t t r r , A r u r s r e , r N c l \ r ! r .

! D i i i I q { D l u , 5 r , r l

fr{r nrgbDrtr aD|)lri '( .cdd untiLdsriL

qcDqxr$rqr ErL drdornqn iqiiRdoli(rd-dn &$ (!d!i,i i!.,rfF\ d itl i

riul * \4-r il l l\ (hhd h xi,,fluLler LL oI{hcr,.lNi u,iitrn,

" n,(!;-t *{.1,""k .-,1

r1i( 1,,{r nrrh( c{h *dioud rd tr, rrrrLr n e . i h l o l r d { r { \ \ n o n . r L ! r L ; A , l o L r , r '

nqL.ll Ff r n,nr. c.,pc c{rL .L r,|q n, r..id.ldKti5s ",qh{ ll inii. nrhl\

.6n' n";, €,k,.", ,4r?,+ Li l?t ! r

o . l l r i d r l \ r $ ' ! l , k ] c | J o q | j l i l d | l ] l ]

ffi€

W

Page 51: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

I9

"""r-.N -0

!J|4'4lo!p]'{DIln I Fsu| lh!\l)\lr r. 'rDtd 3u'd,J,rr \Ii r iiurth,t 5,(!a!|ltr r rFFi.nd q pqrquu4 ^ndd_1i rr traiFItrF ||l[ \LIF$u, d Ll|o|'L]J'uJ|;q

Irr€r \trrt loPr ruo po8 ppor itro x'l auEq$.pn,, P'tr &!t,rn ^l|&u Ptrr \!ol{D 04 ro!x{ x, lopi nFF [r Prt ppou' rltrrr . $z!$n

D'Fno u,orl-rnoj FIs uaF *brr, fi6 qapoul

'r' tu (dl h{n Nl?' rrlr'uorDs rDDxrPr! !,i r u3!! f f n fDtq$ rq,tr ro/i,l qqDi .{n 'Fr

lPr r.uaqd'Ir'Prurd rPnr | lrrnl i r q4r ren* - !,ir 8tr1l,.nr! \!,ti qtr ptrr{1rPurtr!tqDaror.!tr,r ,ri.o qr { xi,ll rnrxN Ptrq}Lr'so FuHnr ru q Fnp' r.rpJi,L s*no{ rtr sDn:poll .pBrt u LtlJp$ dr dr'lrk,lrtJr PJ'qttr tri trr Ptr$- $u!-(otrlrc !t,u.ri,rtr. rru!'l 'trt rr4q iJqrtukrP *o$su l'\,[ r0 i,tK] soruerc]r isrpunt pur 1rojfl,Lli{ rcnrnPo{, sad j: qrtri

Ptr8 rortr q.J I) rirDrtrtD.r t,{tr)!t ,t) \tsni

1r! e"tr\ r. o,$na,!uirr Pnr 4D!,nf

-ur ptr, i.suonuroit { NL, or I t'ep r,ui^n 51a' ptd rtr ,q +psir*od ^ . r.!5, ruo'lvH ao[qduo] s,FnPqd {r q lnluiiuq ilrFtdud 5! Du,\o rll \r$ar h {iJr I'nP6!t)r,r r'Jlf5 o (nq I I rfn {J\.1 rdsnlru.PUoi, Jo i,qp 4r rld uvr lrdv trri n'triqLn' : !r'rir l ur- ro'rdo(rlr lsrtrr,

pu rsD F6 Ir ,uot8 r{D qrlo ^ur or

iuir\ r'ts sa\:rs

uor,|t]]rollar

yvgsccc(I

vsdavcso

csvacnv(I ssJcYYccsJvcscvc ersqwoa

{rvYodpc

cavvcoss

crcvsdcvs

sccvsqcY f,sccrgw

:prsn iq Pt@r eels,Md rrcaoauxl 4{Ji {!'Prn { or rad q4 Ppod noj qIl\r e$otr+B doutr)4 qN u,F! !lt rlo ri

\r uo{ pJrst.s - ruruilotruP on s! rf,lr -rornbas p?qaodrjlrs ! 3' Fsnoq Jo ,totq Iprn

*r.u^Gmq aqrlo G,!$ ! n' P iruQ *n

Piiq o&w . qnR' or p3'l $utr ,{l(rj rotorur .roqr r!! taql p.trnqo J^Rt or itr4L aou*defqNlrrtl vosrrr fm'l.,lr zuodb

/ia a' 4{'. Df-',,-+i f'ld ]

44 i-r11+' \.n \-! -!

Page 52: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

indeed beyond.The effects were registered in histories of art, of science and ofliterature, in the emergent field of cultural studies and in the social sciences, aswell as in the practice of art itsellTwo aspects in particular are noteworthy. Byno means logical bedfellows, they were nonetheless historically powerfullyconnected. On the one hand the period witnessed the beginnings of the impactof French theory on English-language cultural studies. It is not overstating thecase to say that forms of analysis indebted to Ferdinand de Saussuret theory oflanguage via the work of Roland Barthes became dominant across the atts. Theterminology of 'signifiers'and'signifieds', 'signs', 'semiotics'(and later a host ofothers from'deconstructiori to 'difference') sin-rply became the linguaJrnnm ofcultural debate. Accompanying this there was a leaning towards sociologism,which involved a shift in the focus of interest from'text'to'context'.Thus thesocial history of art mounted a critique of modernism's exclusive focus on thevtsual efects of the work of art itself, emphasising instead the constellation ofsocial muses out of which it was made. At this time there also aooeared a scr-

cal led 'socio logy oI knowledge' . And

particularly significant was a developrnentin the philosophy of science associatedwi th T.S. Kuhn's not ion of

'paradignr

revolutions'.Kuhn argued that scientific knowledge

did not progress cumulatively, brick bybrick, truth by truth, but through a seriesof leaps. Certa:in crucial breakthroughswould scr an agenda rhar subseguentscientists then continued to explore.Eventually however, anomalousexperimental results would appear, whichover time began to threaten the system'soverall coherence. After a period ofunce r ta in t y du r i ng wh i ch rhc sys l c rn

underwent fundamental questioning, a'paradigm shift'would occur. A newagenda would emerge, and scientific practice would be rcconfigured to provideexperimental answers to a new set of questions. Kuhnt theory thus introduceda measure of relativism into the field of scientific knowledge. As such, it wasimmediately subject to question and qualification in the philosophy of screnceitself because of the powerful connection between scientific knowledge and theconcept of

'truth'. However, in the cultural field Kuhnt theoretical revision had

a pronounced impact, seeming as it did to lend support to an emerging, andpervasive, relativism of values.

Art & Language tended to be sceptical of the fashion for French theory,instead drawing heavily on the analytical tradition in philosophy. But Kuhnttheory of paradigm shifts seemed to be instantly applicable to art, a liberatingdevice to tl-rink through the change that Conceptual art was making to thefoundational assumptions of previously existing modern art. An essay byAtkinson and Baldwin, published rn Studio Internatlonal in t97o, explored theconsequences of Conceptual art's shift away from what was defined as the

4lRobert Smithson

The FountainMonument - Bitd'sEye Viewfrom Monuments ofPassaic 1967

PhotographThe National lvluseumof Contemporary Art,0slo

42

Art & Language

lndex 01 1972

Photograph oflnsta l lat ion at theGal ler ie Nat ionale duJeu de Paume, Par is,1994

Page 53: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

'tre ur Sul1laporu ueqt rJour sarlnbrt {.torrq

,, uorttrrrJoJsu€Jt E rllns t€ql '.la,ra.tlot1 'Surlts tnoqtl4 sao8 r1 'PIro.& t qrns

Jo uortrnpord oqr eruanpul urlr sdeq;od putl 'plJo.&t alit uI ssrusnoltsuol-jlrs

Irlrtrrl € Jo tururratlqrt rql algeu? utt t€gt orrDtrd Frlos ']lE aaoqe 'a.trtruSol

'lef,rtrrr Jo pupl e dltrruorod st tr€ Jo rarrruor ot sr lI tng 'lrrlrgrssod e st uado

ururual tou lLIS[u fr]rrltsrr arp Jo rsurs prulJoJsu€rr E reqt l€s or rou sI slrll'rorltn€

,lltsltr€, ]€npl^lpui u€ Jo rrnpord :qr sr paprt8ar rg rou 'uolletlalaP

lrtrl-[]s?€ ;o sasod"rnd;o; srralgo atru5 uI rnssl of a^tq JrLItIru plno,{L tI'rpns sy 'srrrnosrr

Ierntlnl-rtlndod ua,ro ro rrtsrnSurl Jerrqdosolrqd;o lrorrca

e lg paunogur ,arrtrr;d Ietrrtaroaqt" rlltlrlJof t 'stutdnrl;ed srl Jo uolfesraluo:)

ttlt Jo tno prtntltsuor )guat a)rf)etd t.re 8uro8-uo ue sdtqtad lrser slril

u1 'o8.rorua ltru ure.r.rat aqt ;o drru tuaraglp e put 'puadop suosr.redruol rsor{l

qrrq.&\ uo suortrugrp auqdnsrp oqt urro;suerr rng lqdosopld Jo uortrsodordr og lrur ! uro11 'ursnrtrrtr tJr 3o arard e ag leru z urrtl 'tJ€

Jo >lJo.u e og leru

r ruatl'ap€ru arr suortdr.rrst lrrluopr ro suosutduror se s8unlt qrns qrrq.,n uodnspuno;8 ft:,r oqr ruJo;sue;l pur aqt ur pue 'ateSorrotur 'tnogt suotlsanb aste.t

ot stq auo 1y rplzn alqrlrdurorur ro 'g qtr.d{ olgutdruor sr V t€qt dts or q8nouo

tou sr tI 'uortd:r.r:d J€purs € ot sr5rtsrt xayul ayl ur uortrlar (l€uortturJo;sueJt,ag1'(srrt4od sll :rusr)nuf ue su ltte sz) Sunpeuros .r/ ars ?^{ teq { atelnurJo;

dlaq loldrua a.{t srrnlrnrts lenldaruor rqt uolsuatxa lq p* 'a8en8uel

rno'rrrll€r 1 (,l a ( go -r:e- rcu / n alqo -tre,'3'a) spur>l Itrnl€u olul prpl^Ip

lou sr - r,re '11-re1n:rr;rd a.roru ro - plJo.&r rql'tno tf,os ot algr sr ouo plJo.4{

Jo pull lp uo rraga Surururrrrp E r^Eq IIr.&r. plro^4{ aqr rno rros or sloldruaauo errafrrl ?ql lfl{r sr uortrsodo;d a8en8uel A tJV )ql uI poporur uortruSoro.r

rql'trr go ,ru8rpt;rd rralgolerrsdqd 'ro]re.reqr-lerrorelu, aqr :,dOd)IAI,

Page 54: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

5

Polmcs nno RepnEsENTATroNThere have been several examples in the history of modern art of projects that

have attempted to imagine a transformed world. The most obvious are those

associated with the Soviet Constructivists of the rgzos, though there have been

others. But international capitalism was not consigned to history after the

Bolshevik October. Neither did the radicalism of the late r96os and r97os lssue

in any fundamental political transformation. Writing as earh as 1973, Lucy

Lippard lamented the absorption of the radical impulses of Conceptual art:

the way that even sheets of typewritten paper were being exchanged as

commodities on the art market, and that leading conceptualists had built

successful careers within the existing market structure. Ian Burn wrote in r98r

that'perhaps the most significant thing that can be said to the credit of

Conceptual art is that rtJailrd '. In that sense, how could it not, given the

generalised failure of the'counter-culture'of which it was a part? And yetdespite the bedrock of capitalism remaining in place, history does move; social

and cultural change occurs. In a more limited sense, Conceptual art was part of

a significant change. One of the key features of the development of Conceptual

art in the r97os was its increasing politicisation. For some, including Burn, this

meant that Conceptual art was transitional: transitional out of art as such, into a

wider field of engaged cultural practice beyond the structures of the art world,

in publishing, television, community or trade union-related activity. But for

others, the developing sense of a politics of representation issued in a change to

the conception of art itself, a change summed up in Hal Fostert remark that

the postmodernist artist was less a producer of objects than a manipulator of

Page 55: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

ourur€J8oJd IrlrPEr r Pre.&troj PTIJJtJ oq,&t stsrtrE ara^{ aJrql'ssoloqlauoN'tno lr.{,\ p]p^ E rrrllt JJrltEr 'uortdurnsuor ot II€l{l uI sass€ur aip rdal reg.u

jo rrcd uorssa.rdxa-;1rs pu€ rusrl€npr^rpur Jo srpftu slr ',ayretrads aql 3o llanos,

ar{t Jo turntltsuot rlg€ruarPo.rJl ut st,&\ tre 'Progaq lng toluaru prrqdosopqd

.slsluorlEnlrs rt.ll rol'PrEPoD:n1-ueaf Jo )ro.4'\ JLll ur sB'uodea,'vr

I€rnt]nr p;.ra.ttod ororu t s€^{ rullC 'a133nrrs f;tuortnlo,rar Jo rtls rlgrs€o; E se

trc amlqr ot rrurl dno.r8 arp 'rraa.uoti 'u;lof ra8sy s€ Llrns stslu€ IltI-4{ 8urryo.,n

l1p1rp1 arrdsag'996r or dn-pyng llt uI stuopnts qruorC Jo uoItEsIIt)IPt:Illt ur rloJ tutrgru8rs r leld or aru€l stsruolttntls aqr 'so96r agl Suunq

./9^,^ -^, ^ooloJpr puu rrnlln] uo uolltJluoluoJ e spJ€.4{or'srnqod.pu€ slltllouofJ

uo uorl€luarJo lsrxJttr^l FuoIlIPtJl JLil ulou A€A{e AlIAIlfe AJ€uoIlnloAJJ Josnro3 aqt ul UIqs e porsoSSns srqa'ruarsfs ogt Sututerurtru uI sonlt^ tueulurop

ot ltrur.ro;uor prrSoloapr lq palryd alor aL[] paureydxa ttqt ltrlros .iorunsuor

urapou;o uorrdaruor e padola.Lap p€q stsruorttrntls aqr af,utrC u1 lprl

ur.696r Jo uumtnv toH papuatxa aroru aqt pue 'su€d ur 996r go sltg 1t141 agrur prxeurrll ?saql'suorslnluor Itrros paruarradxa l1er1 pur arurrg 'ado.rng u1

ld0unl

'arep l1.rta u€ urog srrlqod lnrldxa u€ olergrso ylp lror 3o sodlr prrpuDl ruros

lrg.ro auoqdolSuy orp puolag pur 'so96r rtrl aq] ur pasnrlrlod llSursearurSurruorag r/d! alrqop plro^&{ trE 'te1'soL6r.{1.rea oqr Irlun Lltns sE sanssr,ptrrqod,

passarpp€ a^€q ot llssa.rdxa urras tou srop tr€ pnrd:ruo3 'ppo.t Suqeads-qq18ug oqt ur 'ta ',1€rrtr1od, s€ tunol l1grn8;e gyasrl drru rrg plno) arrtre;d

ue ut t€1,[.4t go sod6oarots rrl] Jo I€snJrr y',prrlr1od, og ot rg ot seq llr.trtreuE ua(o,ttoq rsnl 'oydrurxo ro3 'uor]sonb luergru8rs € sr lI 'uorsuarurp prrrlod

srusrpnldaruor j:o uortsrnb agt ra.to pa.rrnba,r sr arer 'llurrtrr3 'alg€leqap pu€rrreuolgo.rd st ue pntdoruo3 tnoge Surgrl;ala reqr s.rcaddr s?rurtrrrros lJ

'uorletuasa.rdor Jo plrg prorq oqt qtr.4{ lll€lnur poSe8ua oq.&L ruo - su8rs

suedep 0llrA el 0p euieponlrv,p 09snn 'ejnlurod

eun0[ el 0p u0les

196Iruuol TanuawJed

'pssow'ueJng

:I 0N U0nelsaluew

lu0r0IelalN pueJaluouued

lel.lcly{ 1ossoli!Jor^rl0'uerng I0ruec

w

ffouu3'rlss0n'

Page 56: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate
Page 57: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

rltlolf,e ue SuDnpord'so96r-prur ?qt uI trE ot Prurnl P€q oq.&{ reod uerSlag

E se.t{ srreqtpoo.rg '(5f'3y) s4fiy say sawav'ad17y 2utayo1t6 t'r'y,y aasnry s,srae1TPoorg

Iarrery sen urn?snur rqt Jo uoltsanb arp dn loor ttqt lre Jo IJo.t{ l1rca uy.urnJsnru aql

pue la>lr€ur aqr fgtdnur.rd'suorlntrtsur Suruoddns stl Pue J]rsrl rlt Jo uorllun;

aql or stq8rsul rsrqt lldde or ueSoq lprder slsllrv 'llanos ut la,ttod put

a8pa1,u.ou1 go drqsuortelal aqt qtl^t PauJ)fuo) aur€frg 'rtlnlrl.red uI 'llnelnoC

Iaqrlhtr Jo l.ro^{ aql'uolnnpo;d;o suolwlrr Surlsrxa Jo uollrnPordo.r arp or

prlnqrrtuo) llt*J aqr Put uort€fnPa s€ rllns 'suolfnlllsul Fruro3ur PUe Fruro;

qtoq qtrH.&r ur trezv. aqt puetsraPun ot tdtuatte ue;o l.red se ,snlercddt alels

prrSoloapr, aqt Jo uoltou aqt ParnPorlul rassnqllv srnol ;aqdosoltgd rstxre141

qruarC llt 'so9or arEI rqr u1 lpnrs lerltlrr ;o rralgns € aruolaq ot SuruurSag

st,{t suoltntltsul Jo tloJ aql teqt sr turod ogl 'Surpurlsqll^{lou rq8rspurg'partrode,ra a^eq ot tla; aq tng toutrer 896r: alllerd sua.rng ol PJqrEllE ltt{l

rnrrr^ [eJr)r]) oqr 'sadrtts rltslJrlJElEr..l) srLl t-ltl,4^ srred ut aploX slEltd rt1] Jopwftrn63 arp u8rsapa.r o1 996r uI rtels q)uarJ arp lg parr.,rul s€.{\ rq aturr agr lg'llurrrra3 'Jarerrr ralltout sI alg€Il uleurar ot PIes 3q uel lSalerls rerll rlllrll,tt

q8norpp - uorrnrlrsur aqr 3o onbrrrrt aqt 'tre pnrdaluo3 pasllrrqod Jo arnl€g

I€Jtuaf, e auroJJg ot se.&\ l€q,tt Jo f,futlsur ,4.lJea uE s>lJ€ru snql lJo { suJJng'uorl€)ol dulPunoJJns sll oluo

tJt Jo >lro.& rqt ot Peto^Jp {ltrulou uorlurlle or{l rgsu€Jl ol Pu€ 'uo os pue

'tualuof Ituolroura go uorle8au 'paddt f ltaqtsa€ 3o uollt8au 'lsaralul

IEurJoJ

3o uortr8au - suorte8au Jo trs B g8no.rqr uoltrun; ot sI >lro^{ arp;o rlalgo aq1'?+'1il aurze8eru e ;o sa8ed Jrlt ot 'sPreoggrq or 'sSurp1nq

Jo srolralxr aql

ot sar.ralp8 uror; Sur8ue.r 'suort€ntls Jo frnr1drr]nur r q8nolgr saduls Pornolo)

I€rrtre^ >lrturaptrt sltl Pruleluleur 'rrla.&\oq 'urrng 'a8uerp

il]^\ rl q paltldsrp

s>pod{ aqt alq.ln trues aqt ssal Jo aroru ulturar p.u l.rap8 t 'lleuorruo,tuo3

'tr€ Jo >lro.{ eql put aleds uolllglqxe uE ura^qag drqsuorltlar Furrou aql

rJrlur or uo turrt reynrrl.red uI uarng 'txrtuor tre oqt lq parnpur suorlepodxa

aqt ot lnq 'sa^lasuraqt s8urtured aql ol lou uollurllB .4{EJP o1 se.tr turod ag1'.urEulaln ul rE.{t 3tl1 PUE

srslyeueorplsd ''' luaruuo.rr,ua lpep rqt 'rusllltof,a, Sulpnpur srolrtJ;o a8ue.r

E uo anIE^ lltrtltsrt parrguol Surrurtd qrII^{ ul le,tr arp pue 'uorlesuedtuol

pnturds 's1ra(go Jo uoltetuasrtda; arp 'uottrsodruol lnoge suorldurnsse

I€uorluaauof qll.lr op of suoseoJ;o 6aue,r t Sur.rago ',staturtd lou aJE a71\,

p?rurgr larp'arurt aruts aqt t€ patnglrtslP ralgdrued e u1 '(Surrrgrqxa tou r.rt

ruorol 'JartuaurJ€d 'lJssotrAl 'ua.rng) sad uasodxa,u ruo-t'01'-tarluauttud 'llssory'uat'ng

Surpea.r rauueg € rltl^{ tl Suneyda.r '>lro.tt rlf,Llt Pa^ourar stsltr€ *ll 'lep rxau

Jt{t uO-'(rt'8y) tured anlg ur prteor Ljsruq Przrs-PrePuels e lg apeur sluudlur, arenbs Jo s Iuorof PUE

'rtlq^{ Pue .{ard Jo sPueg leluozlJoq Jo s,ralluaurJtd

'punor8 rtrq^r E uo allrlr >lr€lg € Jo s tassotr l 'sadr.rts atIII.A{ Pu€ Par I€lllrr^ JoSurtsrsuor surrng 'a1&s puos.radrur ue PardoPe q)€a PEq slsrlre rnoJ at11'L96r

l.renur{ [ uo arnluJad auna{ e1 rp uoFS ar{l te uol]trtsuorurP e paSels uarng'ruoroJalrlN

Put Jrltu?urJtd laqrlw 'lrssow Ja]^]lO LI1r.4{ lrosuor uI'luarrnf

puortrsoddo rapeorg e ulqtl^t ty llurerrar saltllltte asoq^t tnq,t.rt pntdaruo3,

urrrl rtll ruou JIasuIq ParuBlsIP oq.'!l rsoqr BuourE st,tt urJng IaIu€cJ'slJ€

Fnsr^ aqr Jo play aqr uI trIuralod pmrpr rsluolttntls Jo stradse Surlpogura

nlls u/ )jroM ]ol.led euo Jo qdejFolor.ld

896tr lljov(Bu! preoq-|t l g uropueU)

a?etnes aFetlcrlgy

uaJnS le!uecw

Page 58: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

range of objects, photographs, books and films. Begun in r968 and shown ur rtsfinal form at DorrnnntdV rn ry72, the device of the fictional 'Museum

of Eagles'was in essence simple. Beginning with postcards of nineteenrh-cenruryacademic p:rintings, Broodthaers painstakingly amassed a repertoire of imagcsdrawn from popular culture and advertising. Selecting the eagle allowed for amyriad of representations connoting the rich culrural mythology srrrrounding

:,;,, ':., .

the feathered predator: national slmbol, martial symbol, symbol of fortitude,of perceptior.r, metaphor for genius, etc. By collecting togerher these variousrepresentations, Broodthaers produced, in efl]ect, a second-order represenracion- not of a lot of birds, but of a clas.if icrrory sysrcm ar t4ork. Of course, eaglesconnote various characteristics, as we have seen: valoug power, etc. They also

45I\4amel Broodthaels

Mus'e d AttModene,D6panenent desAigles, SectionPublicit6 7912

nstallatof atDocunenta V, Kassel,Germany

46Janisfounellis

Holses/ 1969

Instalat ion at GaleiafAttico, Rome

47lvlado I\,leE

b e d o n e ? ) 1 9 6 9

l',4eta iubes, gass,plaster, bunches oftwigs1 5 0 x 2 5 0 x 3 2 0(59 x 987. x 136)

Page 59: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

srpnlrtle Jo xrrtrur Irf,ttrrl lllerrlsrl.re w il?.{4. se Qlunos eril or rurod llpatgnopun

s?op tI ral puy 'uolttnrlsuol Jo sPoqlau Pue slerJaltur o1 lrodsar qlt-tt

usrF)rP€r I€trrutlrrl slr ur de1 €ra^od rlrY Jo llroj ]trr rql lEtll 'rlqr FIIPET

Jo uort€lsaJrueru e 'a;nlsa8 e llarour sI sql ile l€ql P?n8le ag 'tsJtlol Jo

'uE) lI

.r"^ t11ttt.t-t8 ? ro; s?tou, su €rraod alv Partu8rsrP lll€luolagl aq'a1oq'radf'1

lrtsrratlErtr..[:) qrr^ Surlun 'paapul',Sutgtltala sr ura]sls rl{t tlJlq^{ uI Pllo.tt€ uI alurlsrxr y.-, de.,n rrleurolslse ue, Sutluesa.rdar se 1lo,lt aqr 3:o Auopuar

Ilera^o arp p:prt8a.r rutla3 'srlu?u.ro;rad laa.rls 3o lrarle.t t ur ltrprultarll

rlrslqlrEue P?IPogrur r^I]f,al]ol ooz s,onalolsld oladuElaq)IIN'Putlorl. pur yatrsl tlgtl Surpnllur 'rea{ 1€ sarrlunol ;o sderu 3o s8urqlra Jaddol 3osarr?s € pornpord lllaog or?ILISqy 'x nd strItllod Ual I€uolllPtrl utql usIFlIPtr

IErnr]nl .rrprorg e lSruSrs leru :tnlsaS s zrrtrAl Jlrstr rusrFlrder rarunsuot

Jo rrrl,[] 6"red lsrunururo3 ItIrHo rtlt Jo Itlltlrf, ssrl ou {Url utIT€lI aqr q8no.rqr

Suruun.r sruarJnl rsrqrJ€ug lpueururopa.rd orp ualrg ltrtd lrcuorln]o^rJ

rrlt ur spntf,alprur Jo a]or rqt PrssntrslP aq qliq.tt ut zo6r;o ralgdured s,ulua-I

Jo rltlr rqr st.&{ srgl'(zf'8g) Palrnrtsuol st.t{ oo13r uE qllli^{.ra^o srtlrutrg,'*-^ttt. hrhPrrrrl cPM :rrrnn )n o .1-"'--1* r,3P€aJrll s€.4{,i?uoP Jg ol sI ]EIl,,!\, os€Jl-lo oq] 'es€l 3uo uI

'uIs{rtrd€r.rrurl1suof uJalsaAJo asuadxo aql lE ulalsal!\

-uou P(IE trrP€uou agl slolxa l€ql Aloaql EJsAod rlJY

Jo tlrdst rtgr uodn .rcag sool3r s zra6 olltIN 'lle rtll

Jo auos or a8pa prrrrlod lltt:.to ue Pug ot Sutsrrd-rnsun

sr lI {Ja^r,e\orl 'uolltl-}]Is u€{t]I aql us^rD 'PIJo^\

tf, E urlrJtruv_-o18uy f.rt.rodrsatuol llt uI slururdola^aP

?d.41-urrojltuv qll,el rlernsuaruiuol sr slrll Jo

nV'(st'8g) l.ralp8 rqt ur sasroq o^lr^\t Prlq€ts slllsuno)

srurrc{'696r ur Juro1 ur uoltellttsul s}tl ro3 'uotleuuguol

ul Jl sv

"uE Jo P]ro.&{ aql uI lrtd al€l sFlauruI PUE

algera8a^,r's]€rulu€,'otor.&t trrtla J sy'.radtd'Pr€o gPrer'poo.4{ 'sauots rs>irrrg :tJ€ r>lEru ol qllq.{{ Jo lno sl€IJrl€lrl

;o a8ur; snoauaSo.rataq pIrE rpl^{ e po€lquro opteS-rutc

utIFtI aqr 'u€ ,ouy, Jo tlPaur FuoltrPtrt rql;o rusnrlda:s e lg ua.Luq 'qll€r^l

Jo ursrrrtrrr E satouuo) 'I>ls.ttotorD trznf rcl:atp qsllod aql Jo arltaql aql

nro# pr^rrap qrq.& 'arutu a'q1'L96r uI E:Ia od rlrv Jo ;auu€g aql raPun aPr€6-lue,e rua8raura ll.ttau e rarpaSor rqSnotg tuqa3 outurraD lltrrr rql lpll u1

'soprq lrqt:; rtgr s8urqr asoqt rurrl rufts aqt t€ PU€frqta; qtog dse,r8 ot nol s:ygtua uoltly € ttql 'r)uoraglP ruo qll6'lla.lt se oP

Etuaurn)ocl alII suollnlllsul PU€ surflssilu Fllso l€r1,4{ ll€J uI sI ti)ItllK'slua^r

Jt:r trlod 3o lpo.red rrtsr lJe uB Jo lBLl) lrt.ltoue ul 's-luJAr rllsrlre 1o lpoled

prrrrlod t Jo alor agf slqd lI luauroru auo uI 'uolllg t sr urnrsilu slqJ.:aloJ.4{

sraeqrpoorg 'uolre]ltrsur €tuarunlocl arp Suiluedurolr€ lxsl t u1 llt;lrg;e

aqt uo 8ur8.re.L lq llosnold ssaull[]Jo.&{ urog Palts a.re,{l. uorluea.rrlul sll'[

Jr sr 'sJossJJfns lsauJtJ af,our slq 3o lueru puolog tI.4{ Jo Jsurs t 3o a8true.Lpe

aql s€q'alurlrs Ierfos ot uegr so8rog ot Jf,our sa.&to qrlq,u lpowd (srrtrllPoorgtng 'salpnts

I€Jntlnr ;o lSatt;rs ulo.&{-[o.4{ t auro]ag lpuonbasgns stq urn?snur

arll SurlrntlsuoJec .stualuot Jraqt uo aJnlJnJls pue JspJo asodrur srllalsls

lrote:grssep wyt:7uryt[uu uarg a^Eq Plnor ]r l€qt osp sr turod aLIl lng lSoloopr

saplrar tJt .&oq'Sutturtd llruaPtle Jo urnlPaur :rp q8no;rqr 'rl€JlsuouraP

Page 60: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

that underlay much of the new art. The point, perhaps, is rol ro insist onseparating the fwo aspects: that Arte Poverat enduring inrerest lies precisely inrhe i r comb ina t i on .

Lmn AurnrclArtists active in places where there actually was a guerrilla war going on foundthe situation tended to demand rarher more directly political responses thanthose that sufficed for the radical avant-gardes in North America andWesternEurope. Lucy Lippard dated her own politicisation from a trip to SouthAmerica in November 1968 where she encountered a group of artists in Rosarioworking in conjunction with the Argentinian labour union, the CGT(ConJederad6n Ceneral delTrabajo, or General Confederation of Labour). Forhistorical reasons to do with the extremely constricted space for properpolitical debate, vanguard art in Latin America became a forum for cultural-political interventions. These ranged from the Media-An Manlfesto, published inBuenos Aires in July ry66, which promised to distribute misinformation aboutart in the mass media in order to underline the implication of arr in publicityand news, to increasingly politicaldemonstrations at maior exhibitions such asthe C6rdoba Biennale. Thoush the term'Conceptual

arr was nor . -p loy.d ro descr ibeit until the rg7os, nonetheless this art has cometo be positioned retrospectively as a key partof a'global conceptualism'. In the words ofMari Carmen Ramirez, Latin Americanconceptualism was not a'reflection, derivationor replica of centre-based conceptual art', butrepresented, rather, a series of'local responsesto the contradictions posed by the failure ofpost-WoddWar II modernisation projects andthe artistic models they fostered in the region'. Indeed, for Ramirez, thrs art wasoriented from the start upon issues in the wider public sphere, rather than onthe institution of (modernist) art itself, and as such may be said to have

'clearly

anticipated'the political turn in merropolitan vanguard art during the r97os.The work that Lippard encounrered in Rosario is a case in point. Since the

mid-r95os, artists had been faced by an apparent failure of art institurlons toaddress a situation of increasing political repression and censorship. This cameto a head around events in the province of Tircamin, where governmenteconornic policies had resulted in mass unemployment and hardship.Conditions were exacerbated by the censorship of informarion in rhe massmedia about conditions in the province. By 1968, about thirty arrisrs wereengaged on a joint project with the union ro research and publicise conditionsthere. This work culm inated in the exhibitio n Tummdn Arde (Tircaman Burns),installed in the CGT premises in Rosario. It has been described by AlexAlberro as'an all-encompassing interior environment', in which visitors wereconf,ronted by a multi-media installation of text-based information in the formof slogans, leaflets and posters, as well as large-scale photographs and film

lrf;r$ril Tilr

60

Page 61: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

't1r() fioots .):t:s\.rLLr lslJuliJJLLlr rltlu.rLll illl lJll.rl .)ll(1.\\ rLll ol

LrUlt().ri)-rr(l I s! Lr()llrLllq ol.rtllrr-i PlLl[]rJ LI.!\o.lq irll r-rtro P.rll4.)l Puf P.)LJs^lr \t

.).r.r.\\ i.LP.r.r.)rl.r '.ir',t luutrou .)LF ul .ijol-)r!.rtll ol ;..,1r'trllr'r.i.tr11 rrnl' i'

.)rll olui s.lrloLl .)lll P:rrllLr.i.llLrr.).r tr.rlll s.rJi).rr'rf\ 'l.r'\.r'!\(rH .rJilrr.)-irloLILIn \s'rl

.ro.rl(rLLr f.rLuIrtlJ.r 5]f15S.ttt:rrlt Ll-rlrs sY Llol]llLll.l()JLlr ftlr'lq PLru lorlLLI.t\,Lrl(r')

r'.]o 1,P.r11rr11[ Il]ttl.L(rrr !\^.rJl1()(l .)(ll \r']Lr 'jrrrl\\ )rLrr\ ') ll Lr s.'tr"rrLr lr-rrlrlcr'1

frLrr.r.Fs-l|\ .)tl .)s.)lP olLro 1.6f i-!ll (lslltlrclLr-r 'rJL(nlsLI()-) Lll'-rr r.rrlr\r -Jo Io(lttr'\s

.,1i s.h:r1rrJ iiLrr.rtl r'1o'; u-\o ) s.rllroq r:]o ) 11-'11'1 il.1111.t 11r ploL1 lt'i '^''1rrr''11

'o1(rr yo I.r.,1.,r.7 r,7o';-rr-,n') JrI Lrl lr.)11.r slr P.r.\.rltl-rr lr tl-rlll.\\ Lrr -\lr,\\.rLI1 Lri I.rl.r \rJl

\t'!t

il

j

sLr.!\ "rJ.\.r.\roLI

Lr.\!ou) ts.r(l .) tI 'sJ loll)l Ll lr(l Lro s.riitrss.rLLr 1t-rutlotl i-trrcltttt'l:_

.t.r(l(ln.t -l() P.)ls^ls^tlor rldrtlu\.) JLrO tlr.)ls.is Jlll olLrr l-rr(l LLI.rLll liLllllLld u'rLll

PUr '[riLlt LI]r.\\ .Frrr-lJ-J.r.)lLlr.

'trol ltrJllri r-r j() s(I.)ls.is LLro tl sl:..[.1<, i-ut nt-rpttll r.ri

,ic1 p...111.1.1.1.,, sJIr.n.rl.\ rtrr-trrJ 1rrrrbl1,,.y7 rlrrr srr.'rlrrsrrT,Jo'6r)6r Ltr tLtti'.r,.1 '.--rr'rrs srtl

r1tr,l .rprtu.ip11.1.t.t,,t +o (rorrrfirr.rt.nlt PJUor:t-rLrrr+!.1 s.lrir.rl\ oP]l')'Jtzrlfl (ll

'p.:ls1\J tlLr tl-rrLl.!\ Lri,itr]lr.rr Ilrtlos lJPl,\\.rtlt p.rt-r.)LlJ-l ltLll 1.to.u -r-'n;-q:.1

o:l ltlsrios^ s^lLIt(1r-rrl.l!r'l .rlll 'uorlnlrls^ttt ltlros l() lllll) lLl.r.l.)HlP lr olLlr fLIll

ir.ryyri:rr1t 1o trrc, iult-1LIs s1r IIJ\\ sl'Lr(rrtrLlLLlxJ lllr tm Jo 5_lLtilLI()-r.rllrtlllllF.rJ

:,111 trro.lt srroLt.lurnsst IliLIolltlJ.\LIol LIlr^\ FLllllr.)-19 .i]snoJtltr|lLLrt\ jfl (Sf i^llll

.,11: III.ili'I,tiiI.ii

lr0l r13N'!r0 3t all e9 pre

tslrP 3rtt to Is€rr rollLtF Lt (;,r)8I

y3t paralsuaLl111\1s31!0q p 0:l L,n0!

0):61)..tah PlaJ naJsttrnirJ tnt,opepl

alL| suottlesut

sa t0i1l 0p L36t

a cnatrEle alrer! l0 lorlta 0l

P! t!aBrv'!9urE3[ r L s]a!o,11

L0rUr p!e slslrPrq s€s urlra 1!3 aLtl

t-D p4E3rr'Lroqe llstrE p0L1rLl nl\

896L (surn€ uErLu.ntlaptv u!tuDtnl

Page 62: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

Sovrsr UruronUnolicial artists in the Soviet Union had a dilferent, but equally cor.rtradictoryrelationship to the Western avant-garde. Whereas in Larin America artrsrstended to be resistar-rt to styles of art that were deemed to be representative ofWestern imperialism, unoficial artists in the Soviet bloc tended to embraceWestern

'expressionist' individualism as part of their rejection of Socialist

Realism.This did not change r-rntil the emergence of the'MoscowConceptualisrs' in the r97os. Once again, the name was a retrospective labelapplied by the critic Boris Groys in 1979. Eric Bulatov and the Komar andMelamid duo developed a hybrid form of painting, based in equal parts onSoviet Socialist Realism and American Pop, to probe the representationalconventions of ofilcial Soviet ideology. Ilya Kabakov adopted a differentstrategy owing more to developments in Western Conceptual art, mixed in with

50ll!€ Kabakov

Carying aut the SlopPail7980

Enamelor p l f rood150x210\59%x82X)EmanuelHoffmannFoundation, onPermanent l0ant0 thel\4useum ofContem porary Art,Basel

Miede lademanUkeles

Washing Trccks/

7973

Photograph ofperformance atWadsworth Atheneurn,Hartford, ConnectcutCounesy Ronald

52Addan Piper

catalysis ]v 1970 I

StIeet performance,NewYorkCity

the experience of his oficial career as a children's book illustrator. In the early

'n7r, l ' " proJ,,."J , ' ."r '" , of A]Lu,nr ' , "r.L of *hl. l ' *". Lui l ' .rounJ ,

ficdonal character, an artist. The device conferred an ability ro reDresenrdifferent avant-gardist schools, as well as cticical commencary upon rhern,w i th in r l re scope o f rhc work : . rn in \ t rncc o f a k ind o f sec .nd-order p r rc r ice ,encompassing and going beyond first-order vanguardist gaml:its, not leastthrough the disruption broughr to the conception of the

'aurhenric' authorial

voice.The mix of image and text employed by Kabakov in the narratiye albumswas further developed in a series of larger paintings made in dre later r97os.These bore a resemblance to ofilcial notice boards, or bureaucratic fornrsblown up to a large scale. Carrying out the Skp Pdll(fig.5o) parodies the command

Pacnucouuet mca n1Jr-,IHot| tetpt * totv-zt Bo0bpsr-6

Vtlt|o ',.X.fap,ufla tfttt' B Sacta c|tto p' a.

Page 63: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

'spadsvpndiluoC luu J.tVpnidnuo3 uonrqlqxr.rrlur3 Itrnrln3 >lro ,tt?N rtll

ot uonngrrtuor pasodo;d Jrq ,&tJrplitru .rodr6 'ol,6t uI 'tunrd gtlm ro,r'r srlllolr uI

s l:ey41 or Surddogs lua.u rlis 1/1 sp[1uu3 ur :(zl'8y) q]norlr rrLI urog Surpn:rord

tpop rllr{.&t :3w1 t rpr.u tng 'sng rrit uo rPol or,[s111 stsQuluS uI 'suoll]t

Itnsnun Jo srrrrs e Sunuro;rad rllgar t.rodsutrr trlgnd uo Surpr.r .lo lrrJls

€ u.&\oP 8uq1t.,lt se qfns suoltrlnlts prlos lrturplo ul Sulltdrlrlrtd .ro 'aturl

l:lnlrred ts rE 'te Suqooy srl.& lls leq.tr 'oldurtxa ;o3 'Surtuarunrop lpog raq

Sursn ot prurnt:adr4 lpuonbrsgns tng 'lrt pnrdaruo3

past g-oEtnBuEI IElrurrgrr-J1as llprrdlr parnpord

p€tl Jtls 'so96r :1ty :gr u1 'Surdolo^rP st.t{ teql rrdurrl

]Errp€r llSursea.rrul orp;o aldrutxr rrtltout sra5o

.radr4 urupy Jo >lro.&\ arlt 'ststtw pnrd:ruo3 Suoruy'(r5'3g),r.rt rluEurtulthl,

;o saldurcxa sE sarsro oqr dn po>llol pue 'srsul leldsrp

paqsrlod'sdols pue roog rLIl prqqnrls aqs'runrurrlty

tltlo.4{spt1\aqt te sJrutru.ro;,r:d u1 'snltls pnbo

prpro)l€ rg plnor{s ad6 rourro; l{t lttlt Surog tuarun8;tr?LI'>lro.ll o dl1-,tuaudo1a,rap, po8pal^{::Dlrt lluourruor

a.rou trlo.rj lrurlsrP s€ '>lJo.4{ adll-.JfuEuJlullltu,

s€ ")lJ 'Surddoqs '8urue:1t '8ur1oor se q)ns 'uJluo^t

qtr.{\ p?trrf,osst uruo tsour rnogel Jo surro; pape.r8u,ttopflpuortua,ruor paugap rr.[s ]I uI 'olsa!ua111 lty aruauatuww

oqr posoduor srlo>lfl uturrJp€-I rlrrlry '696r u1 ':3re1

le ltanos ur pur plro.& lre rqr qqrl^{ qtog'ruslxrs Pu€rusrlrJ Jo urslllllf,l PJSIITJ?u?d e s€ IIJ,tt se fualuraotll

J€.tt urculaln -IluY lll qll.t{ luaturllolut aPnlfut or .tt:r8

l1ryrnb sqr rng '>lro.tt rrrLlt Jo uorllqlr1xr aqt ra.to ug8r.r

,stsrtr€ qrl.u lluo usrq Peq urJ]uol purSrro s,),^\V rtll'srsnrf,

IElrp?r;o orloprod E artrgurr ol rrutl lpldtr

pur 696r [,wnue[u] >lro ^r.:N ur prrrrroJ sr.d{ uonrleo)

srr>l.rolKlrY aqf 'PorrJo rtil Jo ruslFrrP€r rrPI.{ rql

lq parrogt 19 ol Suruur8ag se^{ trt Jo plro.&t aql sol,6r

rrlt Jo trets arp lg 'a.rrdrur rLIr Jo arru?r aLIr q >ptg

vsn'3urr-lloruos sles lluret::: rr tnq :arrr:e:d

lre I€JIIIJ] € Put uortlPuol ]tJnllnr lsruraPoulsodJLII 'uolt€slpgoy8 rnoge slts srqt 1eq.tt alrnb

uorts:nb uado ur sureurar l1't66r Jo rl€uuolg allua1

rql te erssn1 patuosa;da.r dpuegdrunut '6tonto;nq

rtrts olnsoq r lg Suqro,u urog palu?^r;d Surag;o rradsord aqr dg paruneqllpruuarad 'srptr3p .ro3 poslpurS.rtru s€.& ot1.tr o.rn8g agt 'satuolr .ratta.r8

s arntlnl Jo auo u1 ',rusrltnldaruor pgo13, 3o uoarpued aqt otul Par€rgura u?rg

rAELI suorttllrlsul xaldruor slq 'uoqt arurg '696r uI uolun tal^os rLIt 8ur.teo1

llrug 'pto.rgr lrgrqxr ot pr^tolp eg or ue8aq ̂o>ltge) 'sog6r arlt 7o u>110'wsa.Lad

aqr Sur.rnq 's.rral xrs lxru rtp ro; tuarul;rde ]€unururol t Jo surg r{srqgnr

l{l rno Surrrnd ro; etor arp 8urrsl lg Suruuqd qtr.4{ uorssrsqo slurouo:a

Page 64: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

This was intended as a response to the worsening political situation in thecountry, as exemplified by the shooting of students at Kent State Universitywho had been protesting at the escalation of the war in South-East Asia. Piper'sletter of withdrawal was then incorporated into the notebooks constitutingContext #8 and Context #9, respectively subtitled'Written InformationVoluntarily Supplied to Me During the Period April 3o to May 3o t97o' and'Written

Information Elicited From Me During the Period of May r5 to Juner5i rgTo'. Piper later referred to the development taking place in her work atthat time as being'from my body as a conceptually and spatio-temporallyimmediate art object to my person as a gendered and ethnically stereotyped artcommodity'.

Create a little sensationFeel the ditreience that errrrone cin see

Somethingpu cm touchPrDperty

Thereb nothing btmch it

You'vegotit'fouvantto keepitNaturaily Thatt consenation

Itconserr€s those who carftharreitTheydon t ${nt tobeconserwd

L,ogicalt thatb contradicfion

Ererphing you buy m1s smething about youSome things )Du bW say more thm you rEalise

One thing 'ou buy sys erarythingProperty

Eitler you harrc itoryou don't

UKOn the other side of the Atlantic, the analytical tenor of much BritishConceptual art was being leavened by the influx of French theory in the earlyr97os. 1967 had witnessed the English translation of Roland Barthes's Elements oJSemiologt as well as his influential essay on

'The Death of the Author'. His book

of essays Mlthologtes belatedly appeared in English in ry72, containing hisfamous analysis of the different levels of meaning contained in a photograph,in particular the way in which a constructed image may set offunconsciouschains of connotation in the viewer, the more so if the image appears enrirelynatural. For some time,'critical'conceptualists had been moving rowards anawareness of,, not jl-rst art, but the broader register of'the visuaf in general as amajor site of the social production, and reproduction, of meaning.

No one took ideology-critique and semiotics on board more comprehensivelythanVctor Burgin. In a series of works, he moved from general meditatrons on

Logic

3

Page 65: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

pw ',8urqt 8rq ruo, ̂{au) 0rl,4L ',Sorlr8paq aqt, uaa,4{taq urpafl qtwsl,'fq u,,!{€Jpuontrunsrp E ruo;; p aunp altn ay1l7wdua7-uy yur?uo atlt '1rt,,u drgsuontlar

rsuat r ur prtsrx3-or lgarrq rrgr pu:nol e '(,95'8g) xog at11 1o uorlrnpordaqt ur pr^Io^ur aucraq dnor8 srqr 'fl,6 r urorg uounlossrp slt ot ptal

llerluaaa ppo.'leqr dnor8 qsq8ug aqr qlr.,r alndsrp r ur pelorqrlr .ruoreqpeq 3ur,u ryo1,,u.:51 .qt'uonrppe uI',ll€ fntdrtruo3, Jo aru:erd pur8uo

aql uro;; suonrradxa pur stsaratur tuo;agrp Surdole,rap a.ra,,w sauo ;a8unolaql pu€'pa^lo^ur se.n uoDe.raua8 auo urqr a.rour'urrtr.rg u1 l:nua pagrunr uro:3:e; se,n :SenBuE-1 E uV 'sol,6r-prru:qt lq ue3 u1 't:r prudaruo3

3o uorresnuqod aqr ur:yo: parrrqduror e paltld a8tn8w'1 rg rry'qllEa,4l suollBu

rtlt [€ ]souF su,4{o uonepdod :rp 3o llrrouru.r lun e lrql tre; :rp pue 'raarod

trruouotra put uoneunlop Jenxas Jo uorrsaSSns alqnop srr qlrd{ lorss.ssod,

;o uorrou agr 'aydnor Sune;grua p;nneaq purgo-10,u lltuarrdde oqr

3o a3r:un aqt u:a,ntaq 'tsrluor aldrtlnu ego sleyd a:nrrrd aq1'(a:ardsuuo.r;

pue tt8g) aula-uodn-apsrc.,te51 ;o ,{ro aqr punore satrs uo patsedpue s.ralsod st palur:d a:a.tr sa8yrur aql '91,6r ruog eldurexa ruo q'.lrJ.rlt pue

s.rer 's:urn;.rad;o; straape drnxny ruo:; suoqde: 1e:gdn rpur'aur:rps Sursnoqalelosap t q8nortp rue.rd e Suqsnd raqrour rood e .ro 's.ra1:ro,n apura,; pred-.noygo sa8rrul add:-a8euodar-oloqd asodrtnl o] uo lua,n ur8.rnfl a^rrtr? otr aqr Jopoo8 ra:ea.r8 aql .ro; s?Jrs?p Fnpr^rpur sauo Sururnsqns lnoqe lpruoq lsrorry tqlur uorDunluor otur P.f,roj sr tueurasrlJ?^p€ u€ uro.rj palpr fpure; sroaS:noq

t ;o aSeutr snoulnlS fprpru.red e snql €ursn.re,rpe 3o sarraap a,usens.radarp 1t Sursn 'e8aur put txat Jo uonrun(uor palrad'raun :qr qBnorlt tltdul

slr paure8 yot sq: ;o rpn11 'spelotd Sulsre;-ssausnorcsuoo 'lsruolual.r.lur

llpryoads o: (t5'3g) l.r:3aur pnsu;o 3uruorrury prrSolo?pr aql

(3u^l-uodn€llsecMaN'rls

ur troi lo qdPr8oloqd)pl0u0e! clqnd

(.lt€xtt)t8x60t)€tsod

9161 UOISSaSSO.I

ulAng rcph

u0pu0l'u0ncoll0c ole^ud

FnLsx/,9r) zzzxgrru0] poB

sluud crqder?otoqdg16I u049SUaS

uFng rolr!

Page 66: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

'the fox', who knew'many smal1 things'. Despite the fact that Berlin was

addressing the contrasting merits of Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky, the

conceit might be seen to allegorise a difference between modernism

(Greenberg:'aesthetic value is one not many') and a Marxist approach attentlve

to the contingencies of a social practice in history. In terms of its publishedcontents The Foxhad a broader remit than Art-Language, as well as a more

emphatically political tone.The following year,Tercy Atkinson left the English

group, initially working as a video artist, then turning to the production of

drawings and paintings of explicitly politicalcontent on themes ranging from the FirstWorld

War to the confict in the north of Ireland. Those

who remained functioned as a kind of grit in the

a r r mach ine , ma in ta in ing an un rem i t t i ng

scepticism, both for the political enthusiasms of

the NewYork group around The Fox, and to

English artists and intellectuals whose politicised

practice bore the stamp of French theory. English

Art & Language viewed political conceptualism,indeed the wave of radicalised intellectual activity

across the field of cultural studies, with suspicion,

as representing social control by a new layer of

cultural management rather than a genuinelytransformational practice (fi g.le).

TRnrusmonru PRAcrrcEOut of this contested history emerged activities

that were more akin to Ian Burnt sense of

Conceptual art as'transitional' (see p.54). Many

were moving beyond the practice of art as such

with its galleries, dealers and avowedly bourgeoissocial locale, into a more diffuse, harder-to-

categorise realm of radical cultural practice, often

working in conjunction with community groups,trade unions and so on. In the US, exiles from the

disintegrated group arollnd Tbe Fox, including

Michael Corris, Carole Cond6, Karl Beveridge and

others, set up Rcd Herring, another journal with anavowedly radical agenda, and working, in Corris's

ohrase.'in the milieu of left and ultra-left "mass"

organisations and Maoist :(pre-partf" formations'. In Edinburgh, Dave Rushtonand myself, among others, continued with the Srlool project by initiating the

School Press.This worked to design and produce posters, leaflets and brochures

for rank-and-file trade union groups, campaign orgarisations such as RockAgainst Racism, and political bodies including the SocialistWorkers Party. As

NewYork Art & Language broke up, Ian Burn himself left the US and returnedto Australia, pardy encouraged by the potential opened up by the election of the

socialistWhitlam government. Burn was active in Union Media Services, and

The Fox, uol.I, no.1-,r975

Published in New York

Art & Language

frcmTen Posterc7977

Silkscreen on paper108 x 80(42%x31%l

57Combined UnionsAgainst Racism /Gregor Cullen andRedback Graflx

The Workplace ls NoPlace for Racism 1985

FOLLOWING DOUBLE PAGE:55Hans Haacke

Shapolsky et al.Manhattan Real EstateHoldings: A Real-TimeSocial System, as ofMay 1, 1971(dehnl1577

Photographs andtypewritten data sheetsEach photograph50 .8 x 19 .1 ( 20 x7%lCourtesy of the artist

PosterSydney

Page 67: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

loN srsaratur puE slueun(rnuol ,!\au Jo aBuEJ t ot dn pauedo lleu:rrur r:t

;r sr se,u :r 'sarSoyouql.t €rpau Jo af,uasa:d pagrsuatur aqr pue lusrwrua; Jo asr.r

aqt sE sJ)JoJ asJa^rP ,,|llual?ooE qlns Jo aruanEul Jtll .]lPun 'ssell qlr,{1 ur'uo:)

3ura,r-Ua1 puqnlps.r: aq: uo prlredur rapua8 pw art.r;o suons:nb se potnd

srqt Suunp uoueuro;surr: 8uro8:apun se,u ;1as1t ,srr1qod,3o Sutputtsrapun

Jqt 'rl^.,4roH tusrurpt5;o anbDt;r :qt Jo JI€,4{ Jqt ul tututtuoP auoJag

ptrl rErlt r;el ,\.N aqr;o s:rrqod sstp t :,1trrrqod, aqr;o :su:s 3ur,n-13o1

p:epurrr l1a,t:e1a; e ot p.ur.roJuor pa,{auar rsnl a,rtq a,u :tgl rw pnrd:ruo3

;o uontsrrrr4od aq1 d:ors a1or.1,,u:qr Sulrq ulog .r€J '.ra^a,\{oq lsr terll

!nouuc tvNo|Inrlsitl

',31os:r rllrs aqr ur rou lalf,t.rtqf, Fuolttsuerl srr ur le1::y pnrdaruo3

JO anF^ IrA.l srll:PaPn]Juor aFJ'r!lJrs.1s ]Erf,os aqt ur aloJ slr€ Jo ss.uf,re^Ie

Psseorlur PUE tlE Jo uollEJ5rls,{uraF € ot 6urP€al uoD€trnP3 ur ts3Jetur ur

pur ispoqtaru yo,tr p:srue8:o fla.lrrralo: aroru uo srseqdrua ue lsdrqsuortela:uErunr{ Jenlle ot uortuattE ]attaJB t :uortElrunururotr Pu€ trPaur Jo sur]oj

trDerlour.p Jrour asn olbuapual e lualsls Surta1leur eg: :sureBe uon:ea;e :tre pn:daruo3 1o s:rnle ;: aarssarSord a.rg pa:e1osr u:ng 'r86r

Jo ,tsluEpntdaruor-xa ur 3o sJroura1Atr, altrnJ€ srq uI's?Duantusuotr ]Enos rapl,& qlr,{

tuaup^lo^ur Jo srurog prnrr;d a.rour;o aurcu a!11 ur 'qtrns se ut Jo arrlre.rd aql

qrr.lr uolo:q lla.urrugep Sur.req se saal;suagr p:pw8a: po,rlo^ur rsoql rlrqa 'l.re

pnrdaruoS pasorrqod go sur:og 3o rno {1na:rp aso:t saanenrw asarll Jo IIy'stq8u

Fufuoqv Jo; u8rrdurcr aqr se qlns sanssr u€r1e$sny dlergn:ds gtr,uaSe8ue o1 SuruurS:q se lear w '(25 39) sdno;3 llrunururor pu€ uorun rpel Jo

a8ue.r e ;o; sa.rnqrorq pw srarsod parnpo.rd osp srql :raford a;r-1 3ur1.roL1pw

rrv.rJt uo srarlto pue lqrry lpueg 'qrrurg l'llel'uopuel 1a8r51ql,u pa1.ro.,r

Page 68: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

68

Page 69: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate
Page 70: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

everyone felt they had to evacuate the territory of art to sustain a defensiblecritical practice.

A case in point is the work of Harrs Haacke. In his earlier work, Haacke hadrnoved ftom setting up kinetic systems for the circulation of liquids throughtubes, or the continually repeated process of production and subsequentevaporation of condensation within a closed glass cube, to more open systemsinvolving birds feeding and grass growing. By r97o he had turned to socialsystems, As we have seen with Piper, the art world's response to the war inSouth-East Asia had been increasing, and on zz May tie NewYork Art Strike

organised by the ArtWorkers Coalidon - involved picketing the

Metropolitan Museum. As his contribution to the Museum of Modern ArttlnJormation show that summer, Haacke installed a kind of votirg boothconsisting of two

'Yes' and

'No' boxes underneath a wall-mounted question:

'Would the fact that Governor Rockefeller has not denounced PresidenrNixon's Indochina policy be a reason for you not to vote for him in November?'

Rockefeller was, of course, aluminary of the Museum as well as

governor of NewYork. Two-thirdsof those who took part in Haacke'spoll voted'Yes'.

Haacket next planned showwas to have been .l1s tefit, at theGuggenheim Museum, NewYork,in April r97r.The major new piecewas to have been a photo-textdocumentation of what Haackecalled A Ie al-Tine Sotial Slstem.Thiswas to have consisted of the realestate holdings on Manhattan of'Shapolsky

et ali, slum landlordsengaged in the exploitation ofpredominantly African-American

and Puerto Rican communities (fig,5&). The proposal elicited frorn theGuggenheim authorities a statement of what was considered to be theboundary of acceptability for a political dimension of art, a boundary thatHaacket work clearly overstepped.The museum director's statementacknowledged that'art may have social and political consequences', but arguedthat these should be produced'by indirection and by the generalised, exemplaryforce that works of art may exert upon the environment', and not, as Haackeproposed,'by using political means to achieve political ends'. Haacke'sdeliberate blurring of the boundary between politics and art was simply toomuch for a culture whose oficial ideology of art centred around itsindependence, however much that supposed independence might becompromised by the status quo itsellThe upshot was that the exhibition wasforeclosed, its prospective curator dismissed, and Haa&e became thefigurehead of politicised Conceptual art.

Haacke got his own back in 1974 by producing a piece detailing the business

59Hans Haacke

one of sevenindividually1larnedpanelstrcm

A Brced Apaft7918

Photographs on paperaid on boafdEach pane 91x 91(35%x 35%)Tate

60Maftha Rosler

Kitchen 7975

Stillfrom black andwhite video (6 rninutes)Coudesy of the artist

Page 71: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

v

llprrr:geqdlt rsaqt q8norqr sao8 ralsoa'slsuatn qtl.&\ Pa.ra^ot r]qet uaqtrtl>l

E Jo tuog ur Surpuerg '(.S'3g) uiqrilX eqi {o nuonuag ff qtrns s>lro.4{ oaPI^ uI urrs

rg u€r srlnsar rql',rr s,ra1a1o3wg, Jo uolrtru€pxr ut qrl.t{ ue ur,llqtrutertlt,

jo rusrrrtrrf s,prJJC ]retllrry ol popuodsa.r 'lunorrt u,{to lJLl lg 'rolsoa €LIlltW'&nlurpa/le.r put lrrpnxas 'rapuo8

Jo sanssl go lradsa,r ur llgelou rsoru'srrtrlod ftr1u:pr tua8rauro l1'ttau aqr qtlt{ ssaulsng 3rg pue ssep Suru.raruor

sr srrtrlod Jo rsu?s e ortlda.r or papurt tng d.rorra(t.rt r€llrurs e Pa^tollo; srrr,[]O

scllll0d ,tlrNl0l

alalduro: a>lr' JJnlrrJ ou Suraq rJaqt uo traBar rq8*u ruo 'pu,.u ",

t;:ll;::suJng url Surrtog ',?pr,{tplJo^\ slsrt.rt Fntdoruor patlsrn8ultslp tsoru rLIl

Jo ruo, sr'(slseurun orl suortntrtsur .f,ra.L aql lq) paqr.rrsap lgerrrtrualgo;dun

rtrnb sr a>lleEH'rooz ur uopuo-I ur urnosntr l rraqlv A errollln ?ql Pu€l;ogrg aurtuad;as rqr lt uortrgltlxo turol slq or IEIr?r€ru .f,rolrnpo;rur arp

uI'sumasnur.roltur go suortfrllol aqt ur Surprsor 'ptiuouer aurolog .4{ou

?Nrq rrrll pruorturur s>lJo.{t Jrll trr-[] rlg€rurpun sI tI 'tr Surte: put oltr :nol

8ur.tri1 ;o le,tt arnrst l1.rtlnru.red e :Io urslrrtl.rl prrrlod u€Irllrorg SuruarqSrlua

Jo ruJo; prsruJrpour llartr:rdorddt ue ortrrt;d s,a>llt€H sJrpurJ slql

rrr1]ll.& uortsonb uado ut sr 4 '(65'39) s:lutdruor Surpeal rallto put 'slqrltts

rLIl Jo suortErlgr prrrqod orll Surleununyp ',anbrlr.rr ]euorrnllrsul, j:o ;rrJer

r ponsrnd llotnlosa.r stq aq'uoql r)uIS 'srrlsnrl urragueSSnD rqr Jo stsaralul

Page 72: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

intoning their names and miming their use. By the end, however, she isbrandishing the knife, acting out the frustrations of an identiq, confined byt radi r ional gender-def in i t ion.

Among those who drove home the implications of a non-medium-specificConceptual art for reflections on wider questions of representation andidentity-construction was Mary Kelly. As well as building on both the socialinterventions of Haacke and the identity-related work of Piper, Kelly hascommented on how she picked up on some of the potential of the Art &Language lndex installations, or more particularly on what she saw as therrabsences:

'The significance of the relation between the psychic and the social was

made obvious to me by its absence in Art & Language work . . . I saw that spaceas being openJ Her Post-Partum Document (TSZTS) remains a definitive statementon the interleaving of the psychic and the social. While she was working on it,however, Kelly was also involved in a more conventionally'political'project

J

61Margaret Harrison, KayFido Hunt, Mary Kelly

Women atWorklgTS

lnstallation atSouth London Gal lery

o2Mary Kelly

0ne of eight individuallyframed panels from

Post-Partum Docunent(Documentation lV):Trcnsitional objects,diary and diagram7976

Collage, plaster of Parisand cotton with typedtextPanel s ize 27.9 x 35,6( 1 1 x 1 4 )Kunsthaus Zlirich

Mary Kelly

0ne of thirteenindividually framedpanels from

Post Paftum Document(Documentation lll):Analysed markings anddiary-perspectiveschema 7975

Collage, pencil, crayon,chalk and printed0ragrams 0n paperPanel s ize 28.5 x 36( l l%x741")Tate

documenting the historical situation of women in the workforce. Women atWork(fig.er) by Margaret Harrison, Kay Fido Hunt and Kelly was an installation ofphotographs, documents and sound tapes comparable to the Tucamin Burnsinstallation and the Australian Art &Working Life project. It occupied theborder area between historical-political documentation (with its roots in theMass Observation work of the r93"s) and a contemporary Conceptual artinstallation. This undecideablitv is part of its character.

Kelly's Post-Partum Dorummt iik.*ir. built on the presentational devices ofconceptualism to produce a work that challenged conventional senses of theappearance and unity of the work of art (figs.5z-3). Its subject was ostensiblyvery different from the world of industrial work, except that for Kelly the piecewas very much about the sexual division of labour in sociequ. The work is in sixparts, consisting of over a hundred individual'plaques'tracing her son'sevolution from birth through to the acquisition of language and the ability to

Page 73: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

d.rntuar qtarlur^{t :qr;o rarrtnb rstloqr Jo rre rsruJrpourtsod orll artarurod

ot rurEtr rtlrp srrrqod firluopr arp

ot Ua-I ̂\aN rqt 3o srrtrlod oqr urog

UILIs aqt 3o rrltruotdru trs sezv. ryawwo11wnlLad-isoJ'(papnpur ue pnldarue3)

qJns sE t-re puol;g :,roru 3ur,^n-141

e palpoqrur rra(o.rd a;r1 3uq;or11pue

lrv surng JI'lrrsrrlur p:rrqod aLIt pue

pntdaruor aqt']€nsIA aqr oroq.u areldr '1e;aua8 ur uorl€tursJrdo.r;o urtJJal

e uo Sunr.rodo llerrlr.rr se sa^lJsurrtll.{rrs .nou lla; pue urSrng 3>lrl slsrtr€'sogbr lJ-re: :qr lg 'lrrruapr p;"r;pu:8

Jo suorlln.ltsuof, ur ,tJE 3u5, Jouorltrrldrur ?ql uo 'ryfi111ta at{g jo astt

rLJr urpLrc JrnrlnJ "re;ndod uo'oo7 ul'llrpt-t*rr

Jo sanssr uo >lro,&\ of uoxssassodrlJI sl'roJo dord-rr8e Palrtj ruo$

Ir.,nt pa,,rour osp ur8rng Jot)rn'uralr€]nurs u1 '6rruapr

Jo uoltrnrlsuo:)aqr qllt{ op or s?nssr 3o o8ue.r

a.trtro[qns orour r pugaq raur]l aql

jo sruaurolour Frlos, aqt areld or ue8ag

lr 'lurod aqt ol ?roru sdtq.rod lO ',rurll

aql Jo sturur?Aour ItrJos rLIl ol PrlE]3JsJnssl JsIE.r,'lt tnd oqs sr 'of f.ir .uau

aqr lq dn p;u.rdo lerru;rod rlp prsnllsnonsuor drqsuorlrlo.r ;aqroru/pprp

rtll Jo uolt€turrunlop tl]1.)'uorlrPuof ur rql uo llprruo.raJar-y1as Surr:;p;r lroM lentd:ruo3

,:rr,{1eue, rLIJ Luo{ oor ,{e,u 3uo1 eIIJE

Jo >lJo \ tsruJJpolr[ snourouotnrrrlt urog lr,n 3uo1 r sr snll

'r]oll.l{ e se trolo.rd llt satrJ.4{.rrpun trqluerrl sonbrrf go ftoorp rrllleueorplsd

oqt 3o soldu€xo sE ]lr.&{ s€ 'uortrntrs

rLIl uo suonJrHal rrtsrJErP s.JsqtouI ar{l'uorl€sJaluor s.ppqr aqr Jo sldrpsur:l

;slxat turr4:rp go llar;ta r slolduraoqt r1 lro8tiur )ruofr s.urtlfsr lng

'uo os pu€ surrts 'stur;dtooj rolqgrlrs

s ppql rLIr - su8rs 3o :8uer rpr..!{ rsloldura arard aqa'our€u u.t{o snl alrr,{t

Page 74: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

6

Tns LecncYVarious techniques and strategies associated with Conceptual art have becomepervasive in contemporary art. Jenny Holzert employment of language is one.Sherrie Levinet photographic critique of originality is another. CindySherman's play with identiq' is yer anorher. The use of text and photographmade by Barbara Kruger is inconceivable without Conceptual art. And so on.The work of many artists is underwritten by a politics of difference. That ofmany others is focused on the social and institutional production of meanrng.These two strands have jointly rendered historical both the essentialism and theautonomy-claims of modernist theory, no less comprehensively thanmodernism itself once consigned the ethos of the academy to history(although just as the ghost of classicism continued to haunt the modernmovement, the spectre of aesthetic value is present at the feast ofpostmodernism). It would, however, be unfortunare ro close a book onConceptual art with the implication that its principal legacy was one of anethically over-secure and humoudess political correcrness. on the other hand itwould be equally inappropriate to celebrate at face value the kind of claim wehave already encountered that'Conceptualism has become all-pervasive if notdominant in the art world'. In one sense perhaps it has. In response touncomprehending press criticism of his work, Damien Hirsr remarked in zooothat,'I dont think the hand of the artist is important on any level because youare trying to communicate an idea'. The 'idea'

rather than the hand-craftedobject has become the common currency of international contemp orary at:t.But that artt relationship to its institutional conrext is 6r more secure than was

Page 75: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

.asursuou Sursnrlqnd-g1as.ro ftore:glfslu dfdura ruog 'salltrerd a,ttssa.rSord'tr lts auo arep 'Pu€

IEf,ItIJt 'Surlso;alur alenp^a .ro qsrn8urlsrp or :lgrssodurr

sI ]r aJaLI r ss€Joru E otut lurs Surqtfla.ta lsJI 'J?PJo uI aJ€ 'lEuoISIAof,d

tragl€ 'suortfultslP rruos 'Pltrs l€rll'uodsstd ,FnldaruoJ, sll JoJ uoll€l5rynb

rluaPrsar illl laaur lou saoP ro sroP 'y To,'lt'1.ry PsrPuI ro 'x rslltY raqllq.t{

rrlolsrp ot tsat snrultl t llddt or Surltr Jo uoltenlrs I€lIf,reJ agr ur dn pua lysta

ool il€ utr auo 'suoltruSaP Jo suolllurlslP lsEJ Pu€ PJ€q rlroJuJ ol ual€lslu

rg PIno-4{ 1r Pue (P3r.rnlg rre dll^Ilfe Jo sru.loJ luara#IP asrql uro^rlag sabpa aq1

',ulslu;rpoul-rsod, -ro3 u-rluouls e 11.:ntr:.aga st JsuJs slql ul .tustJBrud::uo3,'au:lslr? IeuorteuJrlul aql sso;le lt.ns PIoq l{llurr;nr l€ql sallrlllft P?seg-uollelltlsur

PuE -3truturJojrad '-oapr,,r '-lJr[qo

Jo rSutJ alll rglr]s3P ol lfuJrrnf

otur aruol sELl trLll ,rusllenldefuof, Jo uollou eql Jo DuaSJrrua aql Pulqag saIT

ryrqs srql'lrltuapl Jo slltllod t lg uaur.r,Luopun lpuanbau Put (suolttltrsur

ro sarSolouqrat oapl^ lg p:ruedruortt uar;o) srltllltre Prl€]aJ-afutruro;rod

;o SuruoaS;lnq e lq p:sdqta se.tr 'srrtrlod ssep 8ur,u-tlal t ol st.&t 1I w Pa>lull'tw pntdaruoJ Jo Ptrtrts ptulpue llf 'ruslullnJstru rlgtuoltlst;un dldaap

r ol a8etsoq st :nbrtr:: Ieuolttr pue srslpue ruIIrPIs ol r]qlssod rrueJrg 1I'llsnoautlynurls 'lpoq rqt ot slsltre 3o rred aql uo lsrralul Jo r3lqs alrslraP

r ,tts f.rntuor qrallur^r] aqt Jo rarrenb lsq aqt 'tusruluo; Jo asIJ rql rs€rl

tou'suos€rJ lueru;og lpoq put Pulur dlalltJadsa;'ut lsaJalur u€ PrluJsJJdrIstradse o.tlt Jsaqf 'sluauala JfuttuJoJJJd Jo uoll€JodJolul Jlar{l ut llr.trlre

snxnlC ot rrsoP sJaqto 'Paseg-a8en8uel pue plrrlpu€ orotu auros 'spue;ls

rualulP palr.rcrd'Iolur Jlrsll ut pnrdaluo3 sltll'uolleluosarde; Jo PIaSpeorg € Surssarppt Jrlllerd plrrrlod-plrlrrr € olul sol,6r arp ur Pr^lo^a Pu€

'ut

tsrpreS-turlr pu€ tslulrpotu qtog yo s:stura.rd aql Jo uolt€uIrIIEXa I€f IIIJr t ol

llleltrur parellPrP st.& sIqI'so96r a1r1 arp ul PrSlrurr LIrItl^'\ ',lre pnrdaruo3,

pasrJoaqt llsnoro8r.r arour Put snorf suol-Jlas t s€rt ararll uaqf '?Jlll€rd

rrtaqts?e pasqenads e ueqt raqt€l 'ltr^,utre tre Jo al€lol lado.rd aql se a8rtl te

PIro.{ rtll Jo Pue &r.ttleall uerunll Itsra^Iun E Jo serPl ol lua^{ '8ur1eads llasool'qlFlrt 'sartrlllft

3o a8uer rynads-runrprur-uou e SurrsaSSns Proa *ll Jo asurs

snxnlg/rsrpreS-tut.te u€ st^\ a;raq1',pnrdr)uor, 'rurrl la>1 .rno Jo sasurs luEIrtA

rttrtuaraglp ot tuetrodrut se,tt tr t€qt pan5.re I '>looq slql Jo Suruul8aq ?ql lV's€a llnsal aqt Jo snltls

aql r€q.r{ Jtalr II€ 1€ lust^r rI 'PI€s r^€q a8€n8us'I n lrv se Pu€ :oP o1 1€q.&{

rEsP IIe lE lust.tt I 'pasluSoreJ uturn€N ernlg sv 'l;t pnldaluo3 P€leJrurS]€LIr turds aql qll.&t oP ol qlnul a^€rl urilll Jo raqllru ltgl sr lurod rql rng

'(grrrn aaq or rals€r ro1 t pue) ssrutrarror ptrrrlod pattg-od ulory ulor aLIl Joaprs rltlto rqt sI 'flsnu dod go tuap.,unba FnsIA aqr s€ lJe Jo

'llraue.rodtualuor

Jo saDr]rr^rrt rrlt Jo a^o] s s3ur1o3 ,iAJ-uo ag rI IIII&isrllJd qSrg la8 rr

IIIIK (ll€J tl IILry\ irl a>l€u tl ilI,ry\, :s€ qtrns suorlsrnb rp1.ar pardnrroe.rd $ ]€ql sJII

e ',^{epot q a;ll ^toq tsn( s,tr, sles ag se asn€)rg']rc &eroduraluoJ srJrrsP€ PuesaTl s8urlo3 ',3ursrtr:.Lpt uI suoltou aqr a>ll 'suouou ?rolu'waPr Llpar ua,ra

.ro tuerrodurl Jaaru aJ€ s€epl *lt, teqt sasruSota.r aq urq,u ssaurlslPou slql JornurT rqt srtef,ol s8uq1o3,&raqtt€W rrtstrPeorg Put rltlr) eq1'abre1 lE rrnllnf,

aql ur ldnrro ot aruof stq rr€ l.re.roduraruor atqd aqt ot stuaunuoru are rsaql

a>lrJ srrtlto pur lrtroduraluo3 l.rwodural'oeqllg urraquaSSng 'ur?Potr^l rlef

sE rpns suorlnlrlsur tuerD 'Jlua6Jaure sll Jo luaurolu aql lt s.lJe Itnloaluo]

Page 76: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

At any given time, most of the art that gets produced is not very interesring.This was as true of conceptual art as it is of contemporary postmodernism, oras it was of academic art. In the past, natural wastage has taken care of that. Butas the institution of art has become in{lated in -oJernWesrern socieg/, and asinvestment in it - both cultural and directly financial - has multiplied, itbecomes less and less easy to tell when the Emperor is wearing his new clothes.Conceptual art's greatest strength is that it was, perhaps brie{ly, an episodeagainst the grain of all this. Certain arrists, as artists, took on the responsibilityof checking over the kind of thing art was, rhe kind of insritution i, *"r,

".rjthe kind of role it fulfilled in modern society. It is, I feel, quite misaken toconflate this kind of critical pracrice with the eclecticism that is the mostnoticeable feature of art at the turn of the twenty-first century. In somerespects' conceptual art may be responsible for ihis, for having broken d.ownthe barriers of the media out of which art is thought capable of being made.But in other senses ir is nol I have menrioned the impact thatT,S. Kuhn'stheory of paradigm revolutions made on the development of Conceptual art.Kuhn atgued that most of the time science progressed cumulatively, untilanomalies built up and the whole structure was shaken up and a new period ofnormality commenced.The salient feature of most of the art to which the term'conceptualism'is

applied, whether positively or negatively, is that it is, so tospeak,'normal science'. It is the way things are now, just as academic art was inthe middle of the nineteenrh cenrury and just as modernism was in the middleof rhe twentieth.

Hyperbole and utopianism aside, there is a sense in which Conceprual artwas afotrn of guerrilla action against rhe powers that be, in the shape ofinstitutionalised modernism in both the marketplace and the colleges where arrwas taught and reproduced. Mel Ramsden once remarked that Conceptual artwas less about putting writing on the wall than ir was abour a spirir ofscepticism and irony. If 'conceptualism'has

indeed become th. .tat,r, quo of abloated contemporary art world, then arguably it shares less with the spirit ofhistorical conceptual art rhan it does with the modern academy from whichthose artists took their distance. Nowadays, in a period of pervasive'globalisation

we seem always to be hearing rhat'we are all capitalists now'-liberal capitahsts, of course. By the same token, culturally we are all supposed tobe postmodernists. At the close of George orwell's parable of fru.trat"drevolution, Animal Farm (tg+s), the animals look through the windows of thehouse where their leaders, the pigs, are dining at rhe same rable as the humanfarmers:

As the animals outside gazed at the scene, it seemed to them that something strangewas happening. what was ir rhar had altcrcd in rhe laces, what was ir th"r r""-.d iobe melting and changing? No question now, what had happened. The crearuresoutside looked from pig to man, and from man ro pig, and from pig to man again;but it was already impossible to say which was which.

No doubt, critical arr continues to be made. But only in an orwellian sense canit be maintained that'we are all conceptualists now'.

Page 77: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

LL

ogor srtrd

5g6r'sseyrl'a8prrqur-.t'sqtfyg wwayoytr uc1t1;

lup ry&t-turtry iilt lo fi1uut7u6

,(1J'PUIJESOU'sslrtrl)

roor uoPuo-I

Pue '\^stt{'J;PuguE')

'o66r-996r s7u74t14

yuu11o3 la{y yua ,Q1dosoyt1,J

rri/u rry 'gd:so{ 'rpnso;1

!66r sqodr:uur141'JJluJ-) lrv lr>ilr^\

"rElqxf, 'snxq7 {o 4415 4t u1

oooz proJXO 'aooz-tr6r uV

u nyoytr nt{y'pr tu g'surldog

z66r p:o-1xg'066r <)06r

iroaql ut tty'('spa) pooL1

Jned PUB sJIJulJ 'uosrrrEH

166r pro3x6 'a7aniua1 4 uy

lo s,frssT'saPeq j'uos^IJJEH

gbbr uopuo.I'oo{rtl)

u,(p '('spa) pruzrlg euoal

puE ssou pr^rc 'suog 's.{oJD

f66r-9g6r o8trrq3'uEuB.O ur.lol 'pJ 'slo^

l'usuurt3 yur sfus1 pata11o3

,r1J'lurrurJl'3r;quoorS

196r uolsog'uu1n3

lua uy 'tu2ualJ 'Sraquaar5

966r s:1a8uy

so'1 'r:y {croduaruo3

Jo urnsntr I ,.1Etr

'qxa'tL6r!96r uy {o u{q11

aqt Tuuaysuotay '('sp:) ::ur:oa

JuuY PW uuv 'urrtsPloD

Soor uoPuo-]' uy lvwduu o3'luo1'lar;po3

666r 1:o1mr51'uV

-Jo urnJsntrAl s,uJJnO

"rrf, 'rlxJ \o96t-so!6t ur7u6;

{o ssro4 'wstlvnlJuuoJ pgolt

g66r :ats:r1:rg3'Dpaa[ snyn:il

,.1J '('PJJ ur) 'uBuPrrrc

966r o3r:rg3'yooeluat. q6

F4',}/'.J3€rPrl I'PJrrC

Lg6r

)lffE 2 q' urylt J (n t o lw lu o 2

,r srorrsrrr/(J'('pa) p11':arsog

rP rllr^ tsl rP rurrPol I uV.P L66tJ3sntr^{ "tEtr 'r4xt

laqdatuos ya,I IJssE) "tBf, 'Hx. 'X rluawwoq

f66r uopuol pue qf,^tH

Ma5l'stltto1 lcll JJus 1ty :slndsrg

ul utsluuyoJ{ '\'P) ) InEd

rPoo^\

666r uopuol pur

ur^rH AJN 'tytv3tuary ay {oe?ua11ut13 t11'('p:) pr4 'poo11

fg6r )ro aJN'un#rfoj,{

u{y tty '('pa) uelrfl 'slllt.lA

966r lrlalrag'lry {tuo&uatuo)

{o suarunsoq yuv sauo41 '(spa)

zlrs JJtJd Pur JuDsrJ) 'srJDq

966r,{:1:1:ag'urt1g

1:e{ po 's7uw14ya:a1103

,(1f 'trrqou'uosrJtrus

1,66r uopuo-1,916r-996r

urutug ur uypudnuo2 yua

,1qdu1o t o t1 4, wnuw o q1 alqs s oduq

rrg'('p:) uqof 'st:rgo;

666r uopuol lry

Tuuduuo3 Surram:y'(:p:) p:rg

uel put lJrLJlrr { 'uEruaJN

zl,6r uopuol \auuavs )(lj

{o uy aqt rc{nns1 ,tpn)-waiy

m4g r17 .atroSgrrt !agf1\1

o9or uoPuo'I'suv l:rroduatuo3 Jo

Jtntnsul 'wJ 'Hx} 'utto{ twolzg

sepnllltv uaq/N4:yaag tnof, ur au7

oooz uoPuol'&a1eg yaderl:atrq16

.]EnIXr ,9L6>tg6r

yurpug w uawudxE

yuv datuo3 :pva17 tno{ ut au'1

1.66r,{s1a1::g,'pa puz'zL6t ot gg6t wot{

ua[qg uy aell {o uortvztlplt4pw?Cl

eql:sw1r!S lrn1 'prddrl

zL6t

IJssE) "lBtr' tlx)', 11 alu xltilltoc[

9Oor'sst

tr41'o8prrqual' cluwelt n11

n{y uay 'itttl11'r^nq r(l

gObr sopuo-l 're7irr.S

4t {o x1X eeg 's€luor1l aor-)

9oor uoPlro-] Put rrr^tH

AJN 'rl444' uoutur1l )q1

t|l UV ulryol/V'sBuorlf aoJJ

666r nopuol 'utno1 aty '('pa)

rrllo:r3 rorS:rryg-^orsrli.)

696r uopso-I pur urItrAI 'ltrr

4q ss odu1 n lwuy'lru du o O:au^od UV 'oueujf,D 'tutl3]

996r uopuol'f4wayouuso4

yua usu4ttl :Aoae11

uy {o yug ar11':opr1 'ur8rng

fg6r sr1odeauur1,r,1'nrqg

IJErlrrtrAl'suurt' aytaSluaay

etll {o {toet11'r:ta.1 'rr8rng

oooz'ssEtr\l'r8puqrut3'{usnyuy un4n3 yuu tytaTtua;

-01.'urur[u:g'qolqrng

666r ruola:rrg "slo^ z 'i|\Jud

w a7vnZury 4 uy'('spa)urPsluEx IrI/{ PUE uosrrrEH

srlreq] JJErlrrl^I'uraPJEg

f66t

ltyalttq' uo u qrqxg ur ty tv 5- t uatv t u'rtrnrg'rJ]nqs^rlv

oooz'sstr\['a8prrqurs'Goloqtuyluturt3 y

:uy ywduuo3'('spo) uosurrs

r>18]g Pur lJPurxrIV rorrrqJv

rooz Lalay:g'uy ywduuo2 TurytouY

'('sp:) 1:rro51 rr:utr,1

PU8 rrPusxJJV'orlsqJV

fg6r :8pr:qur3 'pr1

s,JptJ)'ttl rlxa' uuo{ awa ut1

nyn1qp uaqm - zL6t ot t96r

cNrovsuulHrunl

Page 78: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

l ;Il i

l

Inosr

Aboriginal Australian art 9Abstfact Expressionism r8,

17abstraction t, 11, 14, t6, zo,

28, z9-1r

aesthetic, status of z6-7,28,

66, z+Althusser, Louis 57American-type painting 17

And\ticalArtjovnal q5

analytical conceptualism

4r-5' 75Andersen,toels z3-4

Ant i fo rm 7 ,1o ,59Arnatt, Kerth 45

Sef-Burial )7; frg.29

TrouyrWord Pin 15 fig.15

Art & Language 6-2, ll-i,

49, jz- ), 65-6, 7 5; frg56

lnrlex q9, 7z; fig4:

ArtWorkers Coalit ion 63, 7oArt andWorking Lift 67,72,

7t frg.57Art-Ianguage jounal 7, $-q,

45, 49, 55t frg.Jl

Arte Povera 59-6oArtJorummagazine 7,17Atkinson, Terry $-+, 5z-),

Austin, J.L. 45avant-gardism q, ft-27, 28,

75

Bainbridge, David 43Balciessari, John 3r-z

Conposingon Cantas 3z;6g.zo

Baldwin,Michael 3r,43-,1,

52-lBarrv, Robert 35,36

Inert Cas Sries $; frg.27

Barthes, Roland 52,6,1Beckett, Samuel 18Bell, Clive ro

Benjarnin, Walter r7

BerLn, Isaiah 65-6

Beuvs, Joseph z3-5

Eurasra zq;6g.t5

Beveridge, Karl 66

Bochner, MeI z, ,,1-s

Wo rking Draw ings an d othe r

Visiblt Things ... 34; fig.25

Boettr, Alighiero 59Bo ls i rev ism 4 ,6 , t7 ,54

Borg6s, Jorge Luis 59Brancusi, Constantin rz

Britain 3r, y-1,41-5, 16,o+-o

7 8

Broodthaers, Marcel

Musle d'Art Moderne,

Dipannnent dr Argles

57-9;frg15Buchloch, Benjmin 7Bulatov, Eric 6z

Buren, Daniel 57Afichage sawage 57; frg.u

ManiJestation No. L 57;fig'+r

Brirger, Peter rcrR, , . - : - \ / ; - . ^ . , - / . - - ,r r r v , a ) ! v ) r / i

Phxopath 34Possession 65,7rfrg54

Sensation 65; fig.5j

Burn, lan $, 19, 54, 66-7, 7r,

7 )

Cage,John ry , ry , )5 ,37Carnap, Rudolf 49Celant, Germmo 59C6zanne, Paul 6

Chandler, John 16Cobra group r9

ColdWar 16-17

collective works 49Collings, Matthew 75Conceptual art

legacy 6,74-6

use of term 7-9, zz-1,37

concrete nusic 22

Cond6, Carole 66

Constructivisn 14, 15, 54contextualism r.t

Contro|journtl 45Corris, Michael 66

Craig-Martin,Michael 45Crow,Thomas 47Cubism rr, r1

Dadaism 14, 15

L)ali, Salvador r7

Darboven, Hanne 4oBooks.ACentury 4o;fig.y

de Kooning,Willem r7, 18

Debord, Guy 15deconstruction 52,59dematerialisation 35-7Dibbetts, Jan

hrsprtitt Carriltion a4;fig't l

Dommnta V (.rc17 z') 48-9,

5E-9Duchamp, Marcel ry, q3, qq

Bonbrack n; fig;

Fountain e; fig.q

LHOOQ 4-4readymades l-r3, rc1,

z5-6 ,27 , q9

Ernst, Max 17

essentialism r,1

exPressron rg ,2o

leminism zz, 67filt ;sFlrrxus 8, zz-5, 26, 75; figs.r1,

r 4F I . . t H " - ^ ' - - R , , - ,^ _/ "" _ '_,-'/Foster, Hal 54-5Foucault, Michel 57Ilr lox journal 65-6; fig.55

Franrworksjournal 45France r9, 18, +o, 15,57-gFrench theory, influence of

5 2 , 6 4 , 6 6F.;-l \,{ i-L.-l

I tL +o ,7rFry, Roger ro

Germany 4-1,40G6r6me, Jean L6on

O Pti Cien 4; fig.5

gestural abstraction 17, 18

Gilbert and George 46Globalconceptualism 9, 6o,

6 l

Godard,Jean-Luc 55Gorky, Arshile r7

Grahanr, Dan q61

HomrJor Atnerica q7-8;

fig'1"

Gray, Camilla r7

Green movement z4

Greenberg, Clement ro, 16,

1 7 , 2 8 , 6 6

Art dnd Culture u, tz-1

fig.zz

Grotowski, Jerzy 59Groys, Boris (rz

Grrtai group zo; fig.u

Haacke, Hans 7er,7z; f ig.58

British l4land 7r frg.5O

Hamilton, Richard 17

Harrison, Charles 7Harrison, Margaret 7z; f ig.6r

Higgins, Dick zz

Hilliard, JohnCanrcra Rrcorling its awn

Conlition qi; fig.16

Hirst, Damicn 7.1Holzer,Jenny 74Huebler, Douglas 35Hrrnt, Kav Fido 7z; fig.6rL1 , , . - -11 rJ " .^ t . .1 , ,

idea, art as z8-53

identity polit ics 7r-3tmagination zcr

irrstallations t1-7, 1.), 7 z

urstructionpaintings zz

lssar journal 45Italy zo, 55,59-60

Japan 9, 20, zz,1.)

Johns, Jasper 17, 19,27jorn, Asger 19, 55

Judd, Donald 27, z9-3o, )5

Kabakov, Ilya 6z-3

Carrying owt the Slop Pail

6z-;; fig.5o

Kandinsky,Wassily r3

Kaprow, Allan zz

Kawara, On 4oDate Paintings q; fig.12

Kelly, Mary zz-lPost-Partum Docurnffit 7z-3;

figs.6z, 6,1

Womcnatl4hrk 7z;frg.6tKirby, Sandy 67

Klein, Yves 19

Kline, Franz 17

Komar md Melamid 6z

Kosuth, Joseph 7, $-6, 4r, 4l'Proto-investigations'

;4;frg't4

Titbd (Art ds Idta as lfua)fMnninpl b.4ri 6q.]

Kounellis, JannisUntitlrd (Twehc Horvs) S9;

fig +oKozlov, Christine

InJonnation No Theory 35;fig.26

Krauss, Rosalind j8

Kruger, Barbara 7,1Kuhn,TS. 52 ,76

Lacan, Jacques 7,;language

Art & Langrrage 6-7,

4t-5de Saussure'-s theory of 5zlanguage-basedworks 7,

45' 74relation to modern art

t l-14

L'art conaptuel (t9E9') 7Lathan, John

Art anrl Culture .,2-y frg.zz

Latin America 7, 9, 6o-r

Lendon, Nigel 67

Lenin, VI. 59Levine, Sherrie 74LeWitt, Sol 7,35,l7-8

Txo Open Morlular

Cuhts/HaL1-O11 y;

fiq.r.

L ippard , Lucy z ,8 , zq , | ,16 ,

54 ,60Long, Richard

A Linc Made \Walking,Englanl q6;fig38

Louis, Morris zr

Maciunas, George 2,3

Fluxus Man!t'csto zt;

fig't+

Magritte, Rcn6 17

Th Magic Mirror 4;hg.7

Page 79: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

6L

tz atuo1,r,1t1 '3uno1

St,zz,6, L stsDfr uf,luoa

61 8rupn1'g131sua8ur11

ttZ1:st (.696r-;uLf,oI iluoilg e?nlulv uzLl4

gz'?g:Lt 11vauodlns n Turqtrl

aqt ot ytowt,,gt x ,,9{

y

l.-9['5t ::uarmu-l'Jf,ur1!\

9-sf g:{'1t16

f-19'9f'zz'6r-9t r8 srtcts pf,lufl

r5'39

1f9 wu:apr1 :prrry 'srlall-1

sr.EyizL'r-o9 (896r) tyty uywatnl

tf'8y :1,5 a1;r51'ruorolrr lrurPrl^'urTtrf

Lz '6r'Lr'5r 'f r usrpaung

Lr'9r Pros^I-) JIus!t uqol'rJ)PZ3lq

Lr?ry, 16z wouog ?IIIN xls

ot-Oz IUtJ:I'tsJlrt\^of sr::(gg rgr::ds

t-29 'Lr 'lL '6 uoluf-) rrl^oq

z! ust8o1or:os

o7

rrV JtrllJlof, qI JoJ l{JrIlo\^

z9 '!r usqt:11 1tr:oqI7'L.A

'.gt rusa7 {o suawnuoytr

6-gt'9i tr.rqo1'uosqruq1.9 /rr1'qlul-

tz 1:e{'qrrusLg'gS'6r slsruouentls

!-t9'z! slueluJs

Lf '9 !! qnq'gnt1a8:rg

99 \^i^Jrd IooLItr\^99'51' looq:q

z! :ppueurpr:g'JJnssnES

6f '99 ut11 'uotqsnU

Lf Bg :9t sloogoroqd

PE'Eqrsnurz'Lr'e:|I'9 YIIAI'olqrou

og-oq'-z rL rn:1ttty x11 {o vuotweg

Eqlrel^l 'rrlsod

fz ueur:g 'ulslluuEuoU

6 pypnllnuo3Tuyltmaa

ft PV'lPrErlulrd99 leutnol&utttllYaY

gr usrlEJl

g'3g :gr-l,r n pue I utwvl

or.Fg

l6t-gr &uuooy ey yratq

l:r urgoll'3r:qu:g:snt11

9L'gt 'tz usrpuoutsl

5f leutnol tttltu:lvy

6rBg:rt 7uuuru4 wug

9L '6t 'St'rt

Iatr I 'urpsut1

09 UJUJE) rJEtrAi 'zJJrwU

5z auuoq'r:ute11

5r'fr usrrD:npo:d

l. syon p:sec1-ss::o:d

9L'SL'+L'tL'9 usrur:poulsod

8z'rz uorlutsqe {y:aturcd-tsod

gz 'l,r '9r uosl:e{'1:o1yo4

rc'Zglzt yuvwwo2

slemo1 uq71p1 tt11

:tur8rq'a>11o6

'tL-+S 'L usrprrpr: p:rr1od

6! o1:8wyar1:ryq'otlr]otsld

z5 39 lf9 sauas srs,!ur2

zL'oL't-{9 ueupy'radr6

6f dr1rq6'uorFurlp6

rr olqEd rossEtrrd

q8gl-f r uq{yotvt 1u0,7srJu?rJ'rrqEf,rd

6-St, et,tt,. tu.*l:];J.

'flsBy :5/ '19'5-lz 'tz 'Ltz

s^lJoa Pf, sBq- Jf uELulo,Jl 3 c{

tf'3g l/5 1:g:ryq'ruruJLuf,Ed91,'z! suoDn]o^rru8rpe:ed

zl-62 8uuurcd

Sl ltunol y1tts61

if :ata.1 rJuJoqs^O

ot'g! uturol'r11tc1g

ir?glzz uaq tt3

o>lol'ouo

gl?g bt yautusrll um1

r-ol 'rz s^;1nf 'r1str19

8z sJtl-.1'8:nqurpyg

r-ot s1:o,t ;rrseq-rrqunuoL'bz rz qtf,urrJ\'fiuPIoN

!f dnorg r:odnr51

6z 'l.r ltJUJEg 'utuaJN

l.r-9r looqrs Itrot arN

6t.3r1 :9f

stllarSo tot14 no1o3 u aulq

!1.'9t .rrntrg'uaurnEN

tz yutg nfut7

iz 1e4 runl ut51

lz s>1:o,u pJsEq-rlsnu

u'8g ioz uv17

tssEuEpeS 't3ouoto11

if'Bgll5 r:nr16'rassotr41

z9 slsrFntd::uo-.)aof,sow

9l8g,llz wautn:oq

9z 2l!Iytv:)

/-!z'!z llqoU'suJo],^{

9r'fr'u lJrd'u?uPuotrAl

99'82'17'92 trrl3rllsJts rql Jo snlBl\^

tf.ft'82'or trt ltnrda:uo3

rprn dtrlsuourlar

rz dlr:yr:ads-unrpau

6r uorssardxa put

8z'l,r-9r'Sr-O'9 usrul3pou

Lr,9r urol,olrtr ILI

' ot-62' L-92'1. usrJEururtrAi

L+.EU &ut aq)65 ouBtrAl'zrJr^l

6t'3g'.r9 stwtr3y tr?o1o ty 1 oi u1 suo tlf, ? sul

oPJr) ,sJJrrrrtr i

rz ltr:gr:ads-unrp:u09 ots3jruEIN rrv-ErPf,tr^l

(ur8rprrrd tralgole:rslqd,rrtf, EtEqf, -lBurtBu) aOaf W

zl, uorrearosqg ssr141zr8g lLz'rz a$!ua.l apDW

r{z oJf,rd ,ruozmtrAl

z8g st atunbg yrlgIr :rurse;1 'q]r^rlEtN

Page 80: Paul Wood, Conceptual Art, 2002 Tate

PHoroe nAPHrcGnrors

Orazio Bacci, Milm zr

(bottom);RobertBarry 1;The Anthony d'Offay Gallery

47; Kunstsmmlung

Nordrhe in-Westfale n,

Dii'sseldorf / photo Walter

K1ein, DiiLsseldorf 47, 58(top); Charles Harrison 44(top);The Menil Collection,

Houston / photo Hickey

Robertson,Houston 8;The

Metropolitan Museum of

Art, NewYork O 1987 /photo LyntonGardiner 3o;The Museum of

Contemporary Art, Los

Angeles / photo Squids and

Nunns r8 (left); Museum of

Conteinporary Art, San

Diego, @ r966-8 JohnBaldessari / photo Philip

Scholz Ritterman 3z; O zoot

The Museum of Modern Art,

NewYork 16, r8 (right), 1,1(top);The Museum of

Modern Art, San Francisco,

photo Ben Blackwell zo;

Oellentl che Kunstsammlung,

Basel / photo Martin Brihler

6z; OYoko Ono / Lennono

Photo Archive zz; O Edward

Ruscha 1961 46; Seth

S iege laub/@1969Seth

Siegelaub 38; photo @ Fred

Scruton 681

GopvnreurGneors

The publishers have made

every elfort to trace all the

relevant coplright holders.

We apologise for any

omissions that might have

been made.

Beuys, llroodthaers,

Duchamp, Haacke, Kabakov,

Manzoni: O DACS zooz

Buren, Magritte: O ADAGP

l::: *o DACS' London

Dibbets, Kosuth, LeWitt,Morris, Naumann, Weiner:O ARS, NY and DACS,London zooz

Olitski: O DACS, LondonandVAGA, NewYork zooz

Rauscht'nberg: @ RobertRauschenberg / DACS,London andVAGA, NewYork zooz

Smithson: O E.t"t" ofI{obert Smithson / VAGA,NewYork and DACS,London zooz

80