peer supported learning development of teaching skills – a cambridge collaboration - kirstie...
TRANSCRIPT
Peer Supported Learning : development of Teaching Skills
a Cambridge Collaboration
Kirstie Preest, Isla Kuhn, Catherine Reid, Ryan Cronin
University of Cambridge
LILAC March 2015
What we did?
• Developed an in-house course which facilitated sharing of underlying
teaching theory and demonstrations of best practice to aid delivery of
information literacy sessions
• 3 half-day sessions over a week in summer vacation
• Attendees were encouraged to develop skills through their own reflection
and by receiving constructive criticism after delivering a “nanoteach”
session to their peers
Who ran the course?
photos
St John's College, Cambridge,
chapel court 01 by Sailko is
licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0
Murray Edwards College Library
Lucy Cavendish College Library
Where the need came from?
http://www.slideshare.net/infolit_group/cohen
Session 1
● How confident are we as teachers?
● Who are our students?
● Information literacy
● Lesson planning
Session 2
● Teaching resources (handouts)
● Peer review & constructive feedback (reflective practice)
● Teaching demo
● Avoiding disasters
Plus : Teaching Audit
Changes in confidence level: summary
If you started with high confidence, you stayed confident
4.6% average improvement from start to 7 months later
If you started with middling confidence, your confidence improved
26% average improvement from start to 7 months later
If you started with low confidence, your confidence improved massively
328% average improvement from start to 7 months later
Did anything change?
every time I have to teach/present, I remember about the course
(especially the nano-teach session) and I say to myself:
"I can do it - and do it properly!".
Which is definitely a long-term increase in confidence.
The structure of the portfolio course was roughly the same as ever, but I added a powerpoint presentation and an activity for participants.
Yes! The course gave me the confidence
to really focus on what I needed to
say at the points where I had the
opportunity, and thus to leave out
what would only become relevant
later.
I prepared handouts with information to take away. I also thought more about students with different abilities eg. printing handouts on different colour paper
I used the mini teach I delivered at the
training last year to help me plan my MSt
eresources session - and ensuring I got
the students involved in the session.
Reflection: what participants suggested
● Provide constructive feedback ourselves for participants
● more time for planning nanoteach
● less post-it notes!
● Include more discussion time for participants to
exchange ideas/tips
What next?
● Summer 2015
○ re-run course (with peer reviewed real-life teaching)
● development of shared teaching resources
● Encourage staff to gain formal teaching accreditation
(e.g. HEA)
● Run programme at regional level?
Kirstie Preest, Murray Edwards College @kirstiewales
http://seshatscribe.blogspot.co.uk/ for blog posts on this course
Isla Kuhn, Medical Library @ilk21
Catherine Reid, Clare College @CatherineAReid
Ryan Cronin, St John’s College
With thanks to: Jo Harcus, Lucy Cavendish College; Libby Tilley, English
Faculty Library; and Meg Westbury, Wolfson College
References
Cohen, S. (2012), The missing link: librarians and the teaching identity . Presentation at
LILAC 2012 http://www.slideshare.net/infolit_group/cohen [Accessed: 7th April 2015]
Secker, J. and Coonan, E. (2014) A New Curriculum for Information Literacy. Available at:
http://newcurriculum.wordpress.com/ [Accessed: 7th April 2015]
Tilley, L. and Murphy, H., University of Cambridge (2015), Let me tell you a
story….Presentation at LILAC 2015, 9th April 2015
http://www.lilacconference.com/WP/programme/abstracts-day-2#tilley [Accessed: 7th April
2015]