polmeth2009: freedman panel regression adjustments to experimental data: do david freedman’s...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: PolMeth2009: Freedman Panel Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Do David Freedman’s Concerns Apply to Political Science? Donald P. Green Yale](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649ea85503460f94bab97c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PolMeth2009: Freedman Panel
Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Do David Freedman’s Concerns
Apply to Political Science?
Donald P. Green
Yale University
![Page 2: PolMeth2009: Freedman Panel Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Do David Freedman’s Concerns Apply to Political Science? Donald P. Green Yale](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649ea85503460f94bab97c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Using covariates in the analysis of experimental results: the conventional view
• Benefit #1: addresses random imbalance• Benefit #2: increases precision by reducing
disturbance variance
• Drawback #1: burns up degrees of freedom• Drawback #2: increases discretion,
particularly in the absence of an ex ante analysis plan
![Page 3: PolMeth2009: Freedman Panel Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Do David Freedman’s Concerns Apply to Political Science? Donald P. Green Yale](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649ea85503460f94bab97c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Freedman’s critique of covariate adjustment
• Doesn’t follow from the experimental design
• Asymptotically unbiased but may be severely biased in finite samples
• Conventional regression estimates of standard errors may be severely biased
![Page 4: PolMeth2009: Freedman Panel Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Do David Freedman’s Concerns Apply to Political Science? Donald P. Green Yale](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649ea85503460f94bab97c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Freedman’s setup
• Assign a population of size n to treatment and control groups of size m and n-m, respectively
• Potential outcomes model, with responses that are deterministic functions of experimental assignments
• When assessing unbiasedness, consider the average estimate across all possible random assignment
![Page 5: PolMeth2009: Freedman Panel Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Do David Freedman’s Concerns Apply to Political Science? Donald P. Green Yale](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649ea85503460f94bab97c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Why the fuss?
• Experiments are becoming increasingly common, and covariate adjustment using regression is regarded as benign standard operating procedure
• Freedman’s claim that finite-sample bias is appreciable for n < 500 encompasses a large proportion of experimental studies published in political science
![Page 6: PolMeth2009: Freedman Panel Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Do David Freedman’s Concerns Apply to Political Science? Donald P. Green Yale](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649ea85503460f94bab97c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Aims of my paper
• Evaluate the magnitude of the bias for varying n
• Simulated data• Real data (from experiments that have been
reconfigured so that treatment and control are latent potential outcomes)
• Assess when biases are large and whether the symptoms of bias are detectable
![Page 7: PolMeth2009: Freedman Panel Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Do David Freedman’s Concerns Apply to Political Science? Donald P. Green Yale](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649ea85503460f94bab97c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Results
• Simulated examples: although it is possible to construct examples with severe biases, these tend to involve n<20 and noticeably heterogeneous treatment effects
• Analysis of actual experimental data shows very little bias in estimated treatment effects and fairly accurate estimated standard errors
![Page 8: PolMeth2009: Freedman Panel Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Do David Freedman’s Concerns Apply to Political Science? Donald P. Green Yale](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649ea85503460f94bab97c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Bottom line
• Freedman’s legacy is to challenge unreflective use of off-the-shelf statistical methods
• Regression is not unproblematic if applied to small populations with heterogeneous treatment effects, but now we have a clearer idea of what “small” means as a practical matter