portland 2040 analysis. portland residents drive less while per capita vehicle miles traveled is...
DESCRIPTION
…bike more… Bicycles’ mode share almost tripled between 1990 and 2005, and Portland has the most bike commuters of any city in the nation ,500 5,000 7,500 10, ,8503,5553,8853,8303,2074,5205,2255,6905,9106,0157,6868,2508,5628,87510, Year: Cyclists Per DayBikeway Miles Miles of Bikeways Bridge Bicycle Traffic 1992: 83 miles of bikeways 2,850 daily trips Bridge Bicycle Traffic: Bikeway Miles: 2005: 259 miles of bikeways 10,192 daily tripsTRANSCRIPT
Portland residents drive less…
While per capita vehicle miles traveled is increasing nationally at an average of 2.3% per year, VMT per capita in the Portland area is now declining thanks to reliable transit service, smart land-use planning, and public outreach programs.
…bike more…
Bicycles’ mode share almost tripled between 1990 and 2005, and Portland has the most bike commuters of any city in the nation.
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 20050
2,500
5,000
7,500
10,000
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2,8503,5553,8853,8303,2074,5205,2255,6905,9106,0157,6868,2508,5628,87510,19278 84 86 103 113 143 166 183 213 222 235 251 254 257 259
Year:
Cyclists Per Day Bikeway Miles
Miles of BikewaysBridge Bicycle Traffic
1992:83 miles of bikeways
2,850 daily trips
Bridge Bicycle Traffic:Bikeway Miles:
2005:259 miles of
bikeways10,192 daily trips
…and take more transit.Per Capita Transit Trips, 2005
Source: National Transit Database, www.ntdprogram.gov
Only 6 U.S. metropolitan areas have higher per capita transit ridership than Portland, and all are older cities with substantially larger populations.
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
140.00
160.00
180.00
New
Yor
k
Bos
ton
Was
hing
ton,
DC
San
Fra
ncis
co
Phi
lade
lphi
a
Chi
cago
Por
tland
Sea
ttle
Los
Ang
eles
Bal
timor
e
Den
ver
Atla
nta
Mia
mi
Hou
ston
Dal
las
In the past two decades, the majority of the Portland area’s population growth has taken place in urban areas that are close to existing destinations and easily served by transit, bike, and pedestrian networks.
Why? Because we sprawl less.
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Charlotte Columbus Orlando San Antonio Portland
UrbanSuburbanExurbanRural
Source: Nelson and Sanchez, 2003.
Growth by Density Category, 1990-2000
Portland’s per capita GHG emissions are falling.
Metro has not yet conducted a region-wide GHG inventory, but the region’s most urban county lowered per capita GHG emissions due to transportation by 15%, and total per capita GHG emissions by 12.5%, and in between 1990 and 2004.
Source: Portland Office of Sustainable Development, 2005.
Granting low-income residents access to transit is particularly important because they are significantly more likely to take advantage of it than average residents, leading to greater reductions in VMT.
Metro Travel Behavior Survey
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Good Transit &Mixed-Use
Good Transit Only Rest of MultnomahCo.
Rest of Region
Aut
o M
ode
Sha
re
Residents of well-planned cities with good transit service spend less of their household budgets on transportation.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2005.
Smart Growth Saves Money
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%%
of H
ouse
hold
Exp
endi
ture
s S
pent
on
Tran
spor
tatio
n .
The Regional Transportation PlanThe latest update to the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) reinforces the 2040 Growth Concept by ensuring that the transportation network allows residents, commuters, and freight easy access to regional centers. The plan’s goals focus on livability, public heath, and protecting the environment:
1. Foster Vibrant Communities and Efficient Urban Form
2. Sustain Economic Competitiveness and Prosperity
3. Expand Transportation Choices
4. Emphasize Effective and Efficient Management of the Transportation System
5. Enhance Safety and Security
6. Promote Environmental Stewardship
7. Enhance Human Health
8. Ensure Equity
9. Ensure Sustainability
10. Deliver Accountability
Overall, the 2040 Growth Concept shortens travel distances while increasing residential density. Since residents drive less, their cars emit fewer greenhouse gases.
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
Average Travel Distance Average ResidentialDensity
Infrastructure per DU
% C
hang
e, 2
040
Gro
wth
Con
cept
vs.
Bus
ines
s as
Usu
al .
Overall Impacts
Reduced CO2 Emissions
In between 2005 and 2035, the shorter commutes created by the 2040 Growth Concept will prevent an average of 97,746 metric tons of CO2 from entering the atmosphere each year. We would have to plant Douglas Fir forests over 27% of the area inside the UGB to sequester that much carbon.