Presentation to IONAS Project Meeting Brindisi 21/22 January

2005 by

Roberta Sparvieri

Forum of Adriatic and Ionian Cities and Towns

IONAS MAP

VenicePort Venice

Vienna

AnconaPescara

Bari

BrindisiPort Bari

Port Brindisi

Port Corfu

Port Thessaloniki

Port DubrovnikPort SplitSplit

Koper

Thessaloniki

Bar

Port Gioia Tauro

Durres

Port Durres

Cities on WaterEurosportello

EIC Slovenia

Port Bar

24 partners involved amongstMunicipalities and Port Authorities

4 networks of MunicipalitiesAnd Ports

INTERREG projects developed by the IONAS partners • Ancona: City Ports and AAP2020

• Pescara: Sea Bridge and AAP2020

• Koper: AAP2020 and Ancient Water WAys

• Split: AAP2020

• Bar: AAP2020

• Gioia Tauro P.A: Report- Medocc; Port Net Med Plus, and Sestante.

• Koper P.A.: from entrepreneurs…. And Establishment…

• Venice: Agricultural and fishing production, Tudeslove II, UTN II,

Vivi il Forte, LAHSA, Villes Cinemas, and AAP2020.

• Unioncamere Veneto -Eurosportello: the rural development in the

transborder region Italy and Slovenia, AGRISLOVE.NET, LO.DE,

Feasibility study to realize infrastructures of the trans border territory – Belgrado – Bar, INDE, INSERVNET , and B- Cross.

• Vienna: IMMO, Bridge - Lebensader Donau, Technologieoffensive Solarthermie, Expertennetzwerk, Solar -net II, and Ökobusinesplan Wien-Györ

• Thessaloniki P.A: Purchase of Mechanical Equipment, Translognet, training for employees of the Ports of Thessaloniki, Burgas and Durres, Gilda-net.

• Venice P.A: G.I.L.D.A. , Freshlog and AlpFrail.

Ancona

City ports – Interreg III B Cadses

A city network to develop feasible and suistainable logistic solutions through a co-ordinated approach to tackle the city issues of congestion, pollution, and noise.

Lead Partner: Regione Emilia Romagna

Duration: 12/2000-11/2003

Aap2020 – Interreg III C

AAP2020 (Adriatic Action Plan 2020), designed by the Forum of Adriatic and Ionian Cities and Towns in the meetings of Brindisi (2001) and Igoumenitsa (2002), aims at the definition and coordination of policies for sustainable development in the Adriatic region. It assumes the sustainability as a local government’s maker.

Lead Partner: Ancona

Duration: Aprile 2003-Aprile 2006

PescaraSea Bridge – Interreg III A

The main aim is to develop and strengthen the sea transportation networks connecting the Abruzzo Region with the most important European networks like the “Corridor five” and the “corridor eight”. The project intends to increase the cooperation between the two Adriatic shores and the exchanges of persons and goods. The areas involved in the project are the Croatia region with the city of Ploce and the Montenegro region with the Port of Bar.

Lead Partner: RegioneAbruzzo

Aap2020- Interreg III C

Vedi Ancona

Koper

AAP2020 – Interreg III C

Vedi Ancona.

AWW – Interreg III A

The aim of the project is to encourage the awareness of the natural water system through an updated and complete recollection of the information about the main cultural and historical tradition.

Gioia Tauro P.A.Port Net Med Plus – Interreg III B

The main aim was to set up an Interregional Network of Good shipping experiences and practices (RICEM) in the Western Mediterranean (MEDOCC). This netwok would have evaluated possible actions to deal with the issues of goods, passengers, economical impact, port services, logistics, database, and security. The main concern was to develop common strategies in the MEDOCC area in order to encourage intermodal transport by sea.

Lead Partner: Regione Liguria

Duration: ended the 22nd of October 2004Sestante - Interreg III C

Methodologies and ICT Tools for logistics services and the security of ports and interports.

Lead Partner: Regione Toscana

Duration: ended the 13th of October 2004Report – Medocc Interreg III B

The project aims are: to promote coherent and efficient sea freight in the Western Mediterranean; to foster integrated territorial development; to develop integrated services and ITC; to support Small and Medium-sized enterprises; to promote training; sea safety and support to insular systems .

Lead Partner: Regione Liguria Duration: 12/02-10/04

VeniceProduzioni agricole e ittiche INTERREG III A

It aimed at the valorization of agricultural and fishery products in the Venice Lagoon and in Slovenia.

Tudeslove II INTERREG III A

The major aims are:

• The integration and development of the fortresse system in the Slovenian territory

•A second itinerary including the cultural centers of excellence, tied to the neighboring Italian and Slovenian fortification areas;

•The analysis of the product potential markets;

• The product promotion;

• A product club in Italy and in Slovenia.

UTN II- INTERREG III B CADSES

The project aims at strengthening the existing network of European cities in order to improve and develop urban technologies in Central Europe.

VivilForte INTERREG III A

The project aims at realizing the following activities:

- a network of cooperation between Italian/Slovenian public and private stakeholders within the historical-cultural field;

-promotion and valorization of the common historical-cultural patrimony;

- sustainable development in the local communities

LAHSA - INTERREG III B CADSES

Find solutions for the stabilization of the areas with high percentage of council houses, through the realization of integrated urban plans, recovery initiatives of council houses and unused buildings, and through measures promoting job offers.

Adriatic Action Plan 2020 INTERREG III C

Vedi Ancona

Villes Cinemas - INTERREG III C SUD

The aim of the project is to exploit the artistic, cultural and urban resources, and develop the audiovisual industry in the local economy (cinema, television, documentaries, multimedia, photography, etc.) and the related economic-urban activities

Unioncamere Veneto - Eurosportello

Lo.de - Interreg III A

Creation of “Local Development Points” in the Eastern Adriatic Countries. The Local Development Points will support the Italian entrepreneurs to develop commercial and productive activities.

Belgrado Bar – Interreg III A

A feasibility study of the railway Belgrade- port of Bar.

Inde - Interreg III B CADSES

Support to company start-ups and expansions in order to raise confidence among local and international investors.

AGRISLOVE.NET - Interreg III A/Italy and Slovenia

Interreg /Leader

The rural development in the transborder region Italy and Slovenia.

Interreg III B Alpine Space

Promotion of the railway as alternative and complemental means of transport.

INSERVENET Interreg III B CADSES

Support to company transnational, organisational, and technological links, SMEs, regional innovation system, stakeholders and regional/national administrative bodies.

B – Cross Interreg III B CADSES

Exploitation of the new services by the SMEs.

ViennaIMMO – Interreg II A

 Testing and Evaluating some models for the emission of inorganic waste.

Bridge - Lebensader Donau – Interreg II C

Development of the sustainable living – area Danube.

Technologieoffensive Solarthermie, Expertennetzwerk

– Interreg II A

Promotion of Solar energy, setting up a network of experts, know-how transfer.

SOLAR -NET II – Interreg III A

Promoting the use of thermic solar energy in Vienna and in Hungary.

 

Ökobusinesplan Wien-Györ – Interreg III A

Know – how exchange and implementing an EcoBusinessPlan in Györ

MARS Interreg II A  

Monitoring the Alpine Regions Sustainability

TAQI -Interreg III B

(TAQI) Transnational Air Quality Improvement aims at improving the air quality in the panonnic Region

Thessaloniki P.A.Purchase of Mechanical Equipment - Interregg I

4 sea to shore conventional cargo cranes and 1 rail mounted transtainer

Purchase of Mechanical Equipment - Interregg II

2 sea to shore container gantry cranes

Translognet, Interreg II B, Cadses

Education-Specialization of high ranking employees of the Ports of Thessaloniki, Burgas and Durres in state of the art administrative, financial and technical port operations procedures

Gilda-net Interreg II B, Cadses

Vedi Venice P.A.

Venice P.A.G.I.L.D.A INTERREG III B Cadses

It aimed at:

-      Implementing an information and communication technology infrastructure among ports (the hardware of that particular transport network).

-  And consequently it aimed at developing a virtual community serving port – operators/users’ needs (the software of the network). This was meant as a virtual space where supply and demand of transport and logistics services would have met in order to improve the flow of documentations related to the shipping of goods in a door to door perspective.,therefore, increasing productivity and efficiency.

The working group was composed by 7 Italian Regions facing the Adriatic sea, Italian Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, General Department of Italian Coast Guard, Adriatic port Authorities and logistics platforms.

FreshLog INTERREG III B Cadses

It aimed at carrying out a feasibility study for a system of logistics platforms in the CADSES space: a system of specific infrastructures and services for the handling of fresh products.

AlpFrail INTERREG III B Alpine space

looks for operational solutions for the transalpine railway freight traffic for a sustainable network of the economic areas located in the alpine space. The working group is composed by undertakings and actors of Austria, Germany and Italy, with the possible adhesion of Slovenian representatives.

In the Ionas space according to our preliminary survey

the following Interreg projects have been carried out:

14 Interreg III A

11 projects + 3 Interreg IIA

14 Interreg IIIB 10 Cadses, 1 Medocc, 1 Alpine space, 2 Interreg Cadses IIB

4 Interreg III C 3 projects + 1 Interreg IC

INTERREG III A

INTERREGII A

INTERREG III BCADSES

INTERREG III BMEDOCC

INTERREG III BALPINE SPACE

INTERREG II B CADSES

INTERREG III C

INTERREGII C

SEA BRIDGE IMMO CITY PORTS REPORT MEDOCC

ALPFRAIL GILDA NET AAP2020 Bridge

AWW Technologieoffensive Solarthermie

PORTNET MED PLUS

TRANSLOGNET SESTANTE

INTERREG LEADER

MARS UTN II VILLES CINEMAS

PRODUZIONI AGRICOLE E ITTICHE

G.I.L.D.A

TUDESLOVE II LAHSA.

VIVI IL FORTE INDE

AGRISLOVE.NET INSERVENET

LO.DE B-CROSS

SOLARNET II

TAQI

Ökobusinesplan FRESHLOG

Belgrado-Bar

2.2 Level of INTERREG knowledge at the beginning of the programme unit

According to the available questionnaires (18 out of 24), the IONAS partners

have the following level of INTERREG knowledge:

•4 partners said to have no experience

•4 partners claimed some awareness but no experience

•6 partners said to have some experience

•4 partners claimed lots of experience

None

Aw areness butno experience

Some experience

Lots ofexperience

Municipalities and Port Authorities - Level of INTERREG knowledge

none awareness some experience lots of experience

0

1

2

3

4

5

9 Municipalities

8 Port Authorities

Partners with no experience

• Split Port Authority• Dubrovnik Port Authority

• Municipality of Pescara• Muncipality of Thessaloniki

Partners with awareness but no experience

• Municipality of Split• Municipality of Durres

• Bar Port Authority• Durres Port Authority

Partners with some experience

• Municipality of Koper• Municipality of Bar

• Gioia Tauro Port Authority• Thessaloniki Port Authority• Koper Port Authority• Venice Port Authority

Partners with lots of experience

• Municipality of Venice• Municipality of Vienna• Municipality of Ancona • Unioncamere Veneto – Eurosportello

Main strengths in the implementation of the INTERREG projects

Geographical position

• Geographical position (Venice, Ancona, and Thessaloniki P.A.)

Support and cooperation• Administrators and Politicians’ positive attitude towards International relations (Venice, Ancona)

• Existing city network to support International cooperation FAICT (Ancona)

• Internal Cooperation with the National Ministry of Environment (Durres) and with EIC Koper for technical support and partner search (Koper P.A.)

• Cooperation and know-how exchange among the partners (Eurosportello Veneto, Vienna, Koper, Bar, Split, Dubrovnik, Dubrovnik P.A. and Durres P.A.)

Existing conditions• Existing Port Environmental and Personnnel certification (Thessaloniki P.A.)

• Previous research carried out on the project fields (Pescara)

• Efficient road and railway system to access the Trans European and Pan European networks, and efficient port services and structures (Thessaloniki P.A.)

Main weaknesses in the implementation of the INTERREG projects

Municipal weaknesses in complying with the Interreg requests

• Failure to comply with the request of administrative documents within the

deadlines (Venice, Split);

• Lack of communication and know-how exchange among the municipal

departments involved in the projetcs (Venice);

• Lack of trained staff (Ancona, Split, Dubrovnik P.A. Durres P.A, and Koper P.A);

• Lack of time to work on projects (Koper, Split, and Koper P.A);

• Some Country lack of Knowledge about the procedure between first level of

control (Eurosportello Veneto);

Interreg weaknesses

• Long and complex proecedures (Eurosportello Veneto and Venice P.A.);

• Lack of synergies among the MA and the JTS (Eurosportello Veneto);

• Difficulties in collecting the accounting information from the Third countries

(Eurosportello Veneto);

• Too much time to obtain funds (Eurosportello Veneto);

• Sometimes difficulties to get the parallel money in PHARE for Eastern

European partners (Vienna);

Thank you