princewill-assessment of policy makers perception

Upload: princewill-ode

Post on 06-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    1/25

    University of Nigeria NsukkaIn Collaboration with

    Department of Geography and RegionalPlanning, University of Calabar

    With support of

    African Technology Policy Studies (ATPS) Nairobi Kenya

    Stakeholders Consultation & Sensitizationworkshop

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    2/25

    An Assessment of Policy MakersPerception of Climate Change Problems

    and Adaptation by farmers in CrossRiver State.

    By

    Bisong F. E, Andrew-Essien E. & Odum P. O*Department of Geography and Regional Planning

    University of Calabar.

    *Lead Presenter

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    3/25

    Introduction

    Climate Change has been one of the most engagingenvironmental subjects of debate in recent times.

    Scientific evidence has revealed that climate change is an allencompassing threat to the survival and development ofhumanity.

    Climate change often result to mean higher averagetemperatures, changing rainfall patterns and rising sea level.

    Developing countries are particularly vulnerable because oftheir agrarian economies.

    The Niger delta of Nigeria is even more vulnerable to impactsof climate change because of its coastal status, making itsusceptible to flooding, erosion etc, when sea level rise andrainfall patterns changes.

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    4/25

    4

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    5/25

    Climate change impacts agriculture as much as someagricultural / unsustainable land use practices impactsclimate change.

    The Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC)estimates that 31% of total emissions that causes

    climate change came from agriculture, forestry andother land use practices.

    The Climate is changing, and agricultural/ land usesystems must also change if we are to avoidcatastrophe.

    Proper agricultural and sustainable land managementpractices can play a vital role in mitigating climate

    change, but adaptation also remains important .

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    6/25

    IMPACTS OF AGRICULTURE ON CLIMATE CHANGE

    Extensive deforestation for agriculture can affect microclimateinduce climate change

    Agricultural sometimes alter land use as it is associated withsignificant conversion of forest and bush land.

    This has a boomerang effect on climate change /patterns in thefollowing ways:

    Temperature rise: e.g. temperature rise of 10 can affect yield ofcereal crops significantly in the tropics, and also heat stress oncattle.

    Frequency and intensity of extreme events (drought, f loods) Unpredictable rainfall regime likely to impact negatively on the

    productivity of sub Sahara Africas agriculture that is largely rainfed.

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    7/25

    THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON AGRICULTURE

    The impacts of climate change on agriculture areassessed using the following assumptions:

    Change in seasons: Change in season would lead to alteration in planting

    dates, length of growing period and the eventual productivity Increased level of CO2 on the physiology of crop plants

    and weeds

    Changes in climate parameters, particularly

    temperature and rainfall, on plants and animals; and Sea level rise on agricultural land.

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    8/25

    Projection for Nigeria based on 1% annual increase in

    CO2 Concentration

    Projection for Nigeria based on 1% annual increase in CO2Concentration for Rain forest zones indicates an increasein rainfall during the raining season months and a decrease

    during the dry season months. Thus there is a probabilityof the dry seasons becoming drier while the rainy seasonbecomes wetter.

    In the guinea savannah zone, a decrease in rainfall is

    projected for the first four months of the year. This meansthat these normally dry years will become drier as thecentury rolls on.

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    9/25

    Objective This paper presents policy makers and other

    stakeholders understanding of climate change

    problems (climate change stress) faced by farmersand the adaptation measures to combat the riskthrough sustainable land management / Improvedagricultural practices in Cross River State.

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    10/25

    Methodology

    A set of survey questionnaire was administered to policy makers in fourMDAs of relevance to the agriculture and sustainable land management

    sectors in Cross River state, namely: Ministry of Lands

    Cross River State Forestry Commission

    Ministry of Agriculture

    Investment Promotion Bureau

    About 10 top management staff in each of the MDAs respondedcollectively (Group Response) to the set of survey questions Posed.

    The questions posed covered issues such as

    Background information

    Major land use type

    Major land degradation problems / severity

    Climate change association with land degradation problems

    Climate stress severity and adaptation /interventions

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    11/25

    Identified Climate Change Stress

    12 stressors induced by Climate change that affect

    agriculture were identified:1. Late rainfall or early cessation

    2. Unreliable rainfall pattern

    3. Increasing aridity of soil

    4.

    Change in river regime from perennial to seasonal5. Scarce water availability in quantity and quality

    6. Dramatic reduction in crop yield

    7. Increase in draught or flood events

    8. Vegetation/ Biodiversity change due to changing climatecondition

    9. Absence of migratory birds/ insects

    10. Increased pest and disease of crops

    11. Increased desertification

    12. Others

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    12/25

    Analysis of climate change stress severity

    response

    A scale of 0-3 is used to code for severity of climatechange stress as perceived by Policy makers /Stakeholders

    0 = No response 1 = Low severity

    2 = Moderate severity

    3 = High severity

    The perception of climate change stress severity bydifferent policy makers /stakeholder in the selectedMDAs differs significantly.

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    13/25

    CLIMATE CHANGE STRESS On

    Agriculture

    Stress Assessment by policy makers

    Ministry of

    Lands

    Forestry

    Commission

    Ministry of

    Agriculture

    Investment

    PromotionBureau

    Total Total

    stressscore %

    % relative

    to all

    Late rainfall or early cessation 1 2 3 3 9 75 11.25Unreliable rainfall pattern 0 2 3 3 8 67 10.00Increasing aridity of soil 0 0 1 2 3 25 3.75Change in river regime from perennial to

    seasonal 0 3 3 2 8 67 10.00Scarce water availability in quantity andquality 2 3 2 1 8 67 10.00Dramatic reduction in crop yield 2 2 3 3 10 83 12.50Increase in draught or flood events 0 3 0 3 6 50 7.50Vegetation/ Biodiversity change due tochanging climate condition

    1 3 2 3 9 75 11.25Absence of migratory birds/ insects

    2 0 1 2 5 42 6.25Increased pest and disease of crops

    0 3 3 3 9 75 11.25Increased desertification 0 0 3 2 5 42 6.25others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

    100

    Table showing results of coded ranking of Climate change stress severity as perceived

    by policy makers /stakeholders in the selected MDAs

    Source: Authors Computation /analysis

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    14/25

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    15/25Source: Authors Computation /analysis

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    16/25

    Climate Change stress and crop yield patterns in Cross River State

    Crop yield trend for tubers (metric 000 tons)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    cassava

    yam

    cocoyam

    sweet potato

    Source: Bisong F. E. 2009 NSIF-SLM Draft Report,

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    17/25

    Climate Change stress and crop yield patterns in Cross River State

    Crop yield trend for Cereals & Legumes

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    maize

    rice

    groundnut

    cowpea

    Source: Bisong F. E. 2009 NSIF-SLM Draft Report,

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    18/25

    Climate Change stress and crop yield patterns in Cross River State

    Crop yield trend for Vegetables

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5

    5

    1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    melon

    okoro

    pepper

    tomato

    garden egg

    telfaria

    water leaf

    olitorus

    Source: Bisong F. E. 2009 NSIF-SLM Draft Report,

    Ad t ti f li t h t b f i CRS

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    19/25

    Adaptation of climate change stress by farmers in CRSas perceived by policy makers

    CLIMATE CHANGE STRESS ADAPTATION OF AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE

    1. Late rainfall or early cessation Planting early maturing varieties of crops; late/

    early planting,2. Unreliable rainfall pattern Plant drought resistant varieties; irrigation

    3. Increasing aridity of soil Irrigation

    4. Change in river regime from perennial to

    seasonal

    Crop production is limited to only one season; dam/

    river embankments

    5. Scarce water availability in quantity andquality

    Sinking of tube wells & boreholes; mulching

    6. Dramatic reduction in crop yield Carryout mix-crop farming; fertilizer bags, Bush

    Fallowing

    7. Increase in draught or flood events Plant drought resistant varieties and early

    maturing varieties; crop intensification/

    afforestation8. Vegetation/ Biodiversity change due to

    changing climate condition

    NIL

    9. Absence of migratory birds/ insects NIL

    10. Increased pest and disease of crops Plant pest and disease resistant varieties; spraying

    11. Increased desertification Afforestation12. Others

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    20/25

    Agricultural Innovations for climate change adaptation by

    farmers in Niger Delta Region on Nigeria Adaptation by crop choice Improving local agricultural crop varieties that are well

    acclimated as well as drought and pest resistant; Adaptation by altering tillage and husbandry, through:

    use of minimum or zero tillage and other appropriatetechnologies that would reduce soil erosion and loss oforganic matter and nutrients

    Adaptation by altering of input Adaptation by promoting policy Linking crop production to meteorological forecast: Meteorological Agency to alert farmers on weather; Farmers encouraged to use meteorological forecasts Synergizing indigenous knowledge with scientific

    innovations

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    21/25

    Agriculture will need to become much moreefficient in its use of water and other inputs(Integrated nutrient management / improvedplanting materials, agroforestry systems, low

    tillage etc.) in order to meet future food demand without

    significantly increasing its contribution toanthropogenic climate change, while at the same

    time, it will need to adapt to increased climaterisk.

    h l b

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    22/25

    Enriching Soil Carbon Enhance soil through organic methods

    Minimize soil tillage

    Incorporate Biochar

    http://www.junglephotos.com/people/crafts_ethnobot/ethnobotany/ethnobotany.html
  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    23/25

    Soybean planted in no-till

    system: no-till or zero-till

    enhances soil productivity

    through better soil coverage

    and conserves limited moisture.

    Intercropping of cassava and Plantain

    http://www.junglephotos.com/people/crafts_ethnobot/ethnobotany/ethnobotany.html
  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    24/25

  • 8/2/2019 Princewill-Assessment of Policy Makers Perception

    25/25

    Thank You for

    Your Attention