prinkal final one

Upload: anuj-chugh

Post on 14-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    1/54

    Chapter 1.

    INTRODUCTION

    CONTENTS:

    Introduction on capital Budgeting.

    Nature Investment Decisions.

    Objectives of Investment Decision

    Process of investment decision.

    Factors Affecting Capital Investment Decision.

    Introduction:

    INTRODUCTION OF CAPITAL BUDGETING:

    The investment decision of a firm is known as capital budgeting or

    capital expenditure decision .A capital budgeting decision may be

    defined as the firms decision to invest its current funds in long

    term assets to get the benefit over the years .Capital budgeting

    means planning for capital assets. If is to be decided whether

    money should be invested in long term projects like setting up a

    new factory or installing machinery etc. there may be various

    proposals regarding capital expenditure. We are required to choose

    the best out of various alternatives.

    In any business, investment of funds in land, building, equipment

    or stock must be made carefully. Once the decision to acquire a

    fixed asset is taken, It is very difficult to reverse that decision.

    Expenditure on plant & machinery & other long term assets

    influence the future earning capacity of the firms. An efficient

    allocation of capital is the most important finance function in the

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    2/54

    modern times. It involves decisions to commit the firms funds to

    the long - term assets. Capital budgeting for investment decisions is

    of considerable importance to the firm since they tend to determine

    its value by influencing its growth, evaluation of capital budgeting

    decisions.

    NATURE OF INVESTMENT DECISIONS:-

    The investment decisions of a firm are generally known as the

    capital budgeting, or capital expenditure decisions. A capital

    budgeting decision may be defined as the firms decision to invest

    its current funds most effectively in the long- term assets in

    anticipation of an expended flow of benefits over a series of years.

    The long-term assets are those that affect the firms operational

    beyond the one year period.

    Investment decisions generally include expansion, acquisition

    modernization and replacement of the long-term assets. Sale of a

    division or business (Divestment) is also an investment decision.Decision like the change in the methods of sales distribution, or an

    advertisement campaign or a research and development program

    have long-term implications for the firms expenditures and

    benefit, and therefore, they should also be evaluated as investment

    decisions.

    The following are the features of investment decisions.

    The exchange of current funds for future benefits.

    The funds are invested in long-term assets.

    The feature benefits will occur to the firm over a series of

    years.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    3/54

    OBJECTIVES OF INVESTMENT DECISIONS:-

    Understand the nature and importance of investment

    decisions.

    Explain the methods of calculating Net present value (NPV)

    and Internal rate of return

    (IRR)

    Show the implicated of Net present value (NPV) and Internal

    rate Of return (IRR)

    Describe the Non- DCF evaluation Criteria. Payback period

    and Accounting rate of return (ARR).

    Institute the competition of the discounted payback.

    The following are some of the cases, where heavy capital

    investment may be necessary:

    (i) Replacements: Replacement of fixed assets may become

    necessary either on account of their being worn out or becoming

    outdated on account of new technology.

    (ii)Expansion: A firms may have to expand its production capacity

    on account of high demand for its products & inadequate

    production capacity. This will need additional capital investment.

    (iii) Diversification: A business may like to reduce its risk by

    operating in several markets rather than in a single market. In such

    an event, capital investment may become necessary for purchase of

    machinery & facilities to handle the new products.

    (iv) Research &Development: Large sums of money may have to

    expanded for research & development in case of those industry

    where technology is rapidly changing. In case large sum of money

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    4/54

    is needed for equipment, these proposals will normally be included

    in the capital budget.

    PROCESS OF INVESTMENT DECISIONS:-

    Capital Budgeting is a complex process which may be divided into

    the following phases.

    Capital Budgeting Process:-

    1. Identification of investment proposal.

    2. Screening the proposal.

    3. Evaluation of various proposals.

    4. Fixing priorities.

    5. Fesiblity study to identify the viability of the project.

    6. Final approval & preparation of capital expenditure budget.

    7. Implementing proposal.

    8. Performance review.

    I. It throws light on how realistic were the assumptions underlying

    the project.

    II. It provided a documented log of experience that is highlyvaluable for decision making.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    5/54

    FACTORS AFFCETING CAPITAL INVESMENT DECISIONS

    (i) The amount of investment: Computation of capital investment

    required

    (a) Cost of the new projects.

    (b) Installation cost.

    (c) Working capital.

    (d) Proceeds from sale of assets.

    (e) Tax effects.

    (ii) Minimum rate of return on investment: The management

    expects a minimum rate of return on the capital investment. The

    minimum rate of return is usually decided on the basis of the cost

    of capital. (Cut-off point: The cut-off point refers to the point

    below which a project would not be accepted).

    For example: If 10% is the desired rate of return, the cut-off rate is

    10%. The cut-off point may also be in terms of period.

    (iii) Returns expected from the investment: Capital investment

    decision are made in anticipation of increased returns in the future.

    It is therefore very necessary to estimate the future return or

    benefits accruing from the investment proposals.

    (iv) Ranking of investment proposals:

    (a) Where capital is rationalized i.e., that is a limit on funds

    available for investment.

    (b) Where two or more investment opportunities are mutually

    exclusive, i.e. only one of the opportunities can be undertaken.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    6/54

    (v) Risk & uncertainty: Different capital investment proposal have

    different degree of risk & uncertainty. There is a slight difference

    between risk & uncertainty. Risk involves Situation in which theprobabilities are not known. Of course in most cases these two

    terms are used interchangeably .risk in capital investment decision

    may be due to general economic condition, Competition,

    technological development, Consumer preferences, labour

    condition, etc.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    7/54

    Chapter 2.

    COMPANY PROFILE:

    A Miniratna PSU was originally set up in the year 1896 as Central

    Province Prospecting Syndicate which was later renamed asCentral Provinces Manganese Ore Company Limited (CPMO), a

    British Company incorporated in the UK. In 1962, as a result of an

    agreement between the Government of India and CPMO, the assets

    of the latter were taken over by the Government and MOIL was

    formed with 51% capital held between the Govt. of India and the

    State Governments of Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh and the

    balance 49% by CPMO. It was in 1977, the balance 49%

    shareholding was acquired from CPMO and MOIL became a 100%Government Company under the administrative control of the

    Ministry of Steel.

    At present, MOIL operates 10 mines, six located in the

    Nagpur and Bhandara districts of Maharashtra and four in the

    Balaghat district of Madhya Pradesh. All these mines are about a

    century old. Except 3, rest of the mines are worked through

    underground method. The Balaghat Mine is the largest mine of the

    Company. The mine has now reached a mining depth of 309 meters

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    8/54

    from the surface. Dongri Buzurg Mine located in the Bhandara

    district of Maharashtra is an opencast mine that produces

    manganese dioxide ore used by dry battery industry. This ore in the

    form of manganese oxide is used as micro-nutrient for cattle feed

    and fertilizers. MOIL fulfills about 50% of the total requirement of

    dioxide ore in India. At present, the annual production is around

    1,093,363 tones which is expected to grow in the coming years.

    MOIL has set up Ferro Manganese Plant (10,000 TPY) and

    Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide (EMD) Plant (1000 TPY) as per

    its diversification plan for value addition to manganese ore. MOIL

    has also set up a Captive Power Plant and is further considering,

    expanding the capacity of ferro manganese plant and setting up a

    new Silico Manganese Plant by means of joint ventures entered

    into with Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited and Steel Authority of

    India Limited.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    9/54

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    10/54

    Diversification Projects of MOIL:

    MOIL not only deals in manufacture of manganese ore. It has

    started adding value added products to its portfolio and also

    diversified to increase its shareholders value and to become a

    multi-product company.

    1. Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide (EMD) Plant:

    MOIL set up its EMD plant with capacity of 800 TPA at

    DongriBuzurg mine. This plant is second of its kind in India and

    based on original technology. EMD is used in the manufacture of

    dry batteries. Its installed capacity has expanded to 1000 TPA and

    it is also planning to further increase its capacity to 2000 TPA by

    considering its international standard of quality and domestic and

    global demand.

    2. Ferro Manganese Plant:

    MOIL Ltd had produced about 8694 TPA of Ferro Manganese as

    compared to previous years 9081 tonnes. The closing stock of the

    Ferro Manganese was 2078 tone as on date 31.03.2012, or

    14204toones of Silico Manganese or any combination of these twoproducts depending upon the market scenario.

    3. Wind Energy Farm:

    As a part of diversification move, MOIL has set up a wind energy

    farm of 4.8MW capacities at Nagda Hills and 15.2 MW at RatediHills Dist. Dewas, Madhya Pradesh which generates 332.14 Lakh

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    11/54

    units during the year. In consonance with this ideology of Energy

    saved is energy produced. The plan is to utilize the electricity

    generated by this plant to save the electricity cost in the mines

    plants situated in Balaghat district.

    4. Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide (EMD):

    MOIL has manufacture 714 tonnes of EMD in current financial

    year 2011-12 as compared to previous year of 805 tonnes. The net

    sale of EMD was 1005 tonnes as against the previous year was 911

    tonnes. Excellent Award for EMD Plant DongriBuzurg Mine at

    National Convention on Quality Concepts-2011.

    Mines &Wind Farms:

    MOIL owns 10 mines: six of them are located in the Nagpur and

    Bhandara districts of Maharashtra and four in Balaghat district of

    Madhya Pradesh. All these mines are 100 years old and seven of

    them are operated through underground method. MOIL fulfil about

    70% of the total dioxide ore requirement in India. The total

    production of manganese ore from all the mines constitutes about

    65% requirement of the country. MOIL annually produces around

    0.9 million tons of manganese ore.

    In order to promote non-conventional energy resources, MOIL has

    installed 4.8 MW Wind Energy Farm at NagdaHills and 15.2 MW

    Wind Farm at Ratedi Hills, Dist. Dewas in Madhya Pradesh which

    has generated 310.3 lakh units during the year.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    12/54

    Sr.no. Mines Names &ADDRESS

    MAHARASHTRA1. ChiklaMine,Chikla Mine,

    P.O. - Chikla, Tah.-Tumsar, Dist- Bhandara, Maharashtra, Pin-441

    920

    2. DongriBuzurg Mine,

    P.O. - DongriBuzurg, Tah.-Tumsar, Dist- Bhandara, Maharashtra,

    Pin-441 907

    3. Beldongri Mine,

    P.O. - Satuk, Tah- Ramtek, Dist-Nagpur, Maharashtra, Pin-441 105

    4. Kandri Mine,

    P.O. - Kandri, Tah- Ramtek, Dist-Nagpur, Maharashtra, Pin-441 401

    5. Munsar Mine,

    P.O. - Munasar, Tah- Ramtek, Dist-Nagpur, Maharashtra, Pin-441

    106

    6. Gumgaon Mine,

    P.O. - Khapa, Tah-Saoner, Dist-Nagpur, Maharashtra, Pin-441 401

    MADHYA PRADESH

    7. Balaghat Mine,

    P.O. - Bharweli, Dist - Balaghat, M.P., Pin-481 102

    8. Ukwa Mine,

    P.O. - Ukwa, Dist - Balaghat, M.P., Pin-481 105

    9. Tirodi Mine,

    P.O. - Tirodi, Dist - Balaghat, M.P., Pin-481 449

    10. Sitapatore Mine

    P.O. - Sukli, Dist - Balaghat, M.P., Pin-481 449

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    13/54

    LIST OF WIND FARMS

    MADHYA PRADESH1. Nagda Hills,

    Dist. Dewas, M.P

    2. Ratedi Hills,

    Dist. Dewas, M.P

    Source: Annual report of MOIL 2010-11

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    14/54

    The companys mission is to become one of the best manganese

    ore producers of the world with the bursting utilization and the up

    gradation of the skills, knowledge, talents and the technology.

    The company vision is to extent their business into the global

    market by keeping the motives in the view of value addition

    through joint ventures/ technology transfer.

    Objectives of the Organization:

    To maintain the status of market leader in manganese industry

    in India.

    To generate adequate surpluses and insure the best return to

    the satisfaction of all stakeholders.

    To maintain the quality of manganese ore and related products

    at all stage and enhance total customer satisfaction through

    promote delivery of quality material and services.

    Through R&D and adoption of new technologies to diversify

    and modernizes mining and beneficiation methods for upgrading

    low and medium grade ores and achieve growth and through value

    addition.

    To improve the productivity, capacity utilization and cost

    effectiveness through optimizing both human and physical

    resources.

    To explore all possibility of cost effective power services for

    ferro manganese plant

    To make mining areas clean, green and eco friendly.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    15/54

    To strive for a zero accident rate, by further improving safety

    practices.

    To insure a high quality of life to the employees and other

    stakeholders in the vicinity of the industry.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    16/54

    Chapter 3.

    RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

    CONTENTS:

    Title of the project

    Objectives of the study

    Research design

    Research Methodology

    Title of the project:

    STUDY OF CAPITAL BUDGETING AS A TOOL FOR

    INVESTMENT DECISION IN MAGANESE ORE INDIA

    LIMITED (MOIL)

    Research Methodology

    Meaning:

    Research of Knowledge, Research in common parlance refers to

    a research for knowledge. One can also define research as a

    scientific and systematic research for pertinent information on aspecific topic. Research is an art of scientific investigation.

    Research methodology is away to systematically solve the research

    problem. It may be understood as a science how research is done

    systematically. In it we study the various steps that are generally

    adopted by researcher in studying his research problem along with

    logic behind them. It is necessary for the researcher to know not

    only the research method/ techniques but also the methodology.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    17/54

    Definition:

    According to oxford dictionary,

    A careful enquiry especially through research for new facts in any

    branch of knowledge .

    Objectives of Research:

    The main purpose of research is to discover answer to question

    through the application of scientific procedures. The aim of

    research is to find out the truth which is hidden and which has not

    been discovered as yet. Though each research study has its ownspecific purpose, the proposed study is based on following object.

    Described different kinds of capital investment proposals of

    MOIL Company.

    Identify the factors affecting capital investment decisions of

    the company.

    Explain different capital budgeting appraisal methods of the

    MOIL co.

    Evaluate & Rank different capital investment proposal.

    Understand different techniques for incorporating risk factor

    in capital budgeting.

    Wind Mills project(4.80 MW Ratedi project) project is to betaken for capital budgeting(case study) which is installed in 2006-

    2007.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    18/54

    Research Design:-

    Research design may be known as arrangement of conditions

    for collections and analysis of data, in such a manner that aims to

    be relevant to the research purpose with the economy in procedure.It helps in primarily as it facilitates the smooth flow of various

    research process. Research design can be define on the basis of

    Plan & structure of enquiry, formulated in order to answer the

    research question on business aspects. the research plan constitute

    of the overall program of the business process and the planning

    process include the frame work of entire research process i.e. from

    developing the hypothesis the final evolution of collected data.

    Research Design can be understood in such a way which that gives

    the blue print for collection, measurement analysis of business data.

    The design helps researchers to utilize available resource,

    efficiently to achieve research objective. As a research design is

    very essential

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    19/54

    Chapter 4.

    DATA ANALYSIS

    Contents

    Data Collection methods

    1. Primary Data

    2. Secondary data

    Limitations of the study

    Data Collection Method:-

    Various methods have been used for the collection of data

    in this research. After survey at various organizations it has been

    referred by the researcher that an exhaustive study of human

    resource is very essential as it had been done and final conclusion

    was arrived due to it only. Internet plays a major source of

    information for the purpose of study.

    The information for the study is obtained from two sources namely.

    1. Primary Sources

    2. Secondary Source

    Primary Sources:

    It is the information collected directly without any references. It is

    mainly through interactions with concerned officers & staff, either

    individually or collectively; some of the information has been

    verified or supplemented with personal observation. These sources

    include.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    20/54

    1. Thorough interactions with the various department Managers of

    moil.

    2. Guidelines given by the Project Guide.

    Secondary Sources:

    This data is from the number of books and records of the company,

    the annual reports published by the company and other magazines.

    The secondary data is obtained from the following.

    a) Collection of required data from annual records, monthly

    records, Internal Published book or profile of manganese ore India

    limited.

    b) Other books and Journals and magazines

    c) Annual Reports of the company.

    d)For calculation parts Microsoft Excel sheet is used.

    Limitations:

    Though the project is completed successfully a few limitations

    may be there.

    a) Since the procedure and polices of the company will not allow to

    disclose confidential financial information, the project has to be

    completed with the available data given to us.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    21/54

    b) The study is carried basing on the information and documents

    provided by the organization and based on the interaction with the

    various employees of the respective departments.

    c) Time limitation. The duration of the project is short to collect therequired information accurately.

    D) New projects had not been used for Capital budgeting due to

    company does not want to disclosed its new projects. However,

    already installed projects of Wind Farms 4.80 MW NAGDA

    PROJECT (6 UNITS) & 15.20 MW Ratedi Project (19 units) is to

    be taken for Appraisal.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    22/54

    Chapter 5.

    TECHNIQUES OF CAPITAL BUDGETING.

    Contents:

    1. Non discounted cash flows:

    2. Discounted cash flows:

    1.Non discounted cash flows:

    A. Payback period:

    The pay back is one of the most popular & widely recognized

    traditional methods of evaluating investment proposal. It is defined

    as the number of years required to recover the original cost outlayinvested in a project generates constant annual cash inflow, the

    payback period can be computed by dividing cash outlay by the

    annual cash flow.

    Computation of Payback Period

    When the cash inflows are uniform the formula for payback period

    is cash outflow divided by annual cash inflow

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    23/54

    Standard:

    Select the projects which have payback periods lower than or

    equivalent to the stipulated payback period.

    Arrange these selected projects in increasing order of their

    respective payback periods.

    Select those projects from the top of the list till the capital Budget

    are exhausted.

    Another Standard

    In the case of two mutually exclusive projects, the one with a lower

    payback period is accepted,

    Whenthe respective payback periods are less than or equivalent to

    the stipulated payback period.

    EXAMPLE: MOIL Ltd. is assessing the purchase of a new

    machine for its immediate expansion programme. There are three

    possible machines suitable for the purpose.

    (Rupees in Lakh)

    Particular Machine I Machine II Machine III

    Capital cost 300 300 300

    Sale(at standard price) 400 350 325

    Net cost of productionDirect material 40 50 48

    Direct labour 50 30 36

    Factory overhead 60 50 58

    Administration cost 20 10 15

    Selling& Distribution cost 10 10 10

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    24/54

    Condition:

    o The economic life of machine 1 is 3 years, while it is 4 years

    for the other 2 machines.

    o The scrap values are Rs.30,00,000, Rs.25,00,000 , Rs.

    20,00,000

    o Tax to be paid is expected at 33.175% of the net earnings of

    each year

    Solution:

    Particular Machine I Machine II Machine

    III

    Capital cost 3,00,00,000 3,00,00,000 3,00,00,000

    Life of machine 3 years 4 years 4 years

    Sales 4,00,00,000 3,50,00,000 3,25,00,000

    (-) Cost of production 1,50,00,000 1,30,00,000 1,42,00,000

    (-) Administration cost 20,00,000 10,00,000 15,00,000

    (-) Selling & distribution cost 10,00,000 10,00,000 10,00,000

    Profit before depreciation&

    tax

    2,20,00,000 2,00,00,000 1,58,00,000

    (-) Depreciation 90,00,000 68,75,000 70,00,000

    Profit after depreciation

    &before tax

    1.30,00,000 1,31,25,000 88,00,000

    (-)Tax 33.175% 43,12,750 43,54,190 29,19,400

    Profit after depreciation & tax 86,87,250 87,71,810 58,80,600

    (+) Depreciation 90,00,000 68,75,000 70,00,000

    Net cash inflow 1,76,87,250 1,56,45,810 1,28,80,600

    Payback period 1 years 8

    month 12

    days

    1 years

    11month

    2 years 4

    month

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    25/54

    Interpretation:-

    In the given condition payback period rule moil as to select the best

    machine is I as compare to II & III & the machine I pay back

    period as earlier as compare to II & III machine.

    In the select the machine I as payback period 1year 8 month 12

    days as less as compare to machine II & III. Recover cost of capital

    as far as earlier to machine I for that reason have to be selected.

    Merits:

    simple to compute.

    Provides some information on the risk of the investment.

    Provides a crude measure of liquidity.

    Demerits:

    No concreat descison criteria to indicate weather an

    investment increases the firms value.

    Increases the cash flow beyond the payback period.

    Ignores the time value of money and the risk of future cash

    flows.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    26/54

    B.DISCOUNTING PAY BACK PERIOD

    Moil Ltd is thinking to install one of the 2 machines A & B

    Particular Machines A Machines B

    Initial outlay 2,50,00,000 3,40,00,000

    CAFT

    2013 Nil 90,00,000

    2014 50,00,000 1,30,00,000

    20151,80,00,000 1,40,00,000

    2016 1,40,00,000 1,60,00,000

    2017 1,35,00,000 1,40,00,000

    Condition:

    Cost of Capital is 15% for both machines

    Solution:

    For machine A

    Year Cash inflow PVIF(15% for 5

    years)

    Present

    value

    Cumulative

    present value

    2013 Nil 0.86957 Nil Nil

    2014 50,00,000 0.75614 37,80,700 37,80,700

    2015 1,80,00,000 0.65752 1,18,35,360 1,56,16,060

    2016 1,40,00,000 0.57175 80,04,500 2,36,20,560

    2017 1,35,00,000 0.49718 67,11,930 3,03,32,490

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    27/54

    Payback period= 4years 2month 16 days

    For machines B:

    Year Cash inflow PVIF(15% for 5

    years)

    Present value Cumulative

    present value

    2013 90,00,000 0.86957 78,26,130 78,26,130

    2014 1,30,00,000 0.75614 98,29,820 1,76,55,950

    2015 1,40,00,000 0.65752 92,05,280 2,68,61,230

    2016 1,60,00,000 0.57175 91,48,000 3,60,09,230

    2017 1,40,00,000 0.49718 69,60,520 4,29,69,750

    Payback period = 3years 9month 11 days

    Interpretation:-

    In the given condition moil have to be selected machine B have for

    that first have to be discounting cash inflow after that calculate

    payback period for actual amount has to be find out.

    Merits:

    Consider the time value of money.

    Consider the riskiness of the project.

    Demerits:

    No concreate descison criteria to indicate wheather an

    investment increases the firms value.

    Requires an estimation of cost of capital.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    28/54

    C. Accounting rate of return:

    Accounting rate of return also known as the return on investment. It

    is used to measure the profitability of an investment. The

    accounting rate of returns is found out by dividing the average aftertax profit by the average investment.

    For Example:

    Director of moil Ltd are thinking of new machine to replace to old

    one which has been in operation. Charging the depreciation by

    fixed instalment method & considering tax rate 33.175% on net

    earnings. Suggest which of the following 2 alternatives to analysis

    & preferred best one is selected.

    Merits:

    This method is very simple & popular for the organisation to

    find out the return rate of investment

    It is very easy to understand the income from the project.

    Accounting rate of return can be readily calculated from the

    accounting data. No adjustment isrequired to arrive at cash flow of

    the projects like in NPV & IRR.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    29/54

    2. Discounted cash flow technique:

    A.Net Present Value (NPV):-

    Net present value of an investment/project is the difference

    between present value of cash inflows and cash outflows. The

    present values of cash flows are obtained at a discount rate

    equivalent to the cost of capital.

    Accept or reject criterion:-

    The net present value can be used as an accept or reject criterion.

    In case the NPV is positive the project should be accepted .If the NPV is negative the project should be accepted.

    For Example:

    MOIL Ltd is contemplating 2 alternative machine A & B. The

    cash outflow for both machine

    Rs. 4,00,00,000 is present time.

    Year CAFT A CAFT B

    2013 40,00,000 1,20,00,000

    2014 1,20,00,000 1,60,00,000

    2015 1,60,00,000 2,00,00,000

    2016 2,40,00,000 1,20,00,000

    2017 1,60,00,000 80,00,000

    The company has targeted return of 10% p.a. on capital.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    30/54

    Solution:

    For machine A

    For machine B

    Year CAFT B PVIF (10% For 5

    Years)

    Present value

    2013 1,20,00,000 0.90909 1,09,09,080

    2014 1,60,00,000 0.82645 1,32,23,200

    2015 2,00,00,000 0.75131 1,50,26,200

    2016 1,20,00,000 0.68301 81,96,120

    2017 80,00,000 0.62092 49,67,360

    Total PV 5,23,21,960

    (-) total initial invest 4,00,00,000

    NPV 1,23,21,960

    Year CFAT A PVIF(10% FOR 5

    Years)

    Present value

    2013 40,00,000 0.90909 36,36,360

    2014 1,20,00,000 0.82645 99,17,400

    2015 1,60,00,000 0.75131 1,20,20,960

    2016 2,40,00,000 0.68301 1,63,92,240

    2017 1,60,00,000 0.62092 99,34,720

    Total PV 5,19,01,680

    (-)total initial investment 4,00,00,000

    NPV 1,19,01,680

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    31/54

    Interpretation:

    In the above net present value concept of the

    moil ltd have to be selected machine B for the more profitable

    machine as compare to machine A. Machine B is total cashinflow at present time is more positive as compare to machine A.

    Machine A is not negative but thats present value of cash inflow

    is less as compare to machine B for thats why machine A is not

    selected.

    Merits:

    This method explain weather the investment increases the

    firm values.

    Consider the time value of money and all cash flows.

    Consider the risk of future cash flows (using cost of capital)

    Demerits:

    Requires an estimation of cost of capital for calculation of

    NPV.

    2. Profitability Index:

    Yet another time- adjusted method of evaluating the investment

    proposals is the benefit- cost (B/C.) ratio or profitability index (PI)

    Profitability Index is the ratio of the present valued of cash inflows,

    at the required rate of return, to the initial cash out flow of the

    investment.

    Condition:

    Profitability Index = Less than one (NPV < 0), NPV is negative

    than reject the project.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    32/54

    Profitability Index = More than one (NPV > 1), NPV is positive

    than accept the project.

    Profitability Index = Equal to one (NPV =1), NPV is zero& reject

    the project.

    Following estimation details of moil ltd is given below for the

    profitability index of 2 machines

    (Rs.in lakh)

    Particular Machine x Machine y

    Cost of capital 56.125 56.125

    Estimated life of machine 5 Years 5Years

    Scrap value 3. 3.

    Annual income after depreciation & tax

    2013 3.375 11.375

    2014 5.375 9.375

    2015 7.375 7.375

    2016 9.375 5.375

    2017 11.375 3.375

    Company estimating servicing charges at the end of 3 years Rs. 20,00,000 in

    case of machine x.

    Depreciation has been charged by fixed installation method. Discounting as per

    bank rate is current position is 10% p.a.

    Analysis the project of moil is which machine is acceptable.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    33/54

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    34/54

    CALCULATION OUTFLOW OF MACHINEX& Y AT PRESENT TIME.

    Particulars Machine X Machine Y

    Cost 56,12,500 56,12,500

    (+) servicing charges

    (20,00,000* 0.75131)

    15,02,620 Nil

    Total outflow 71,15,120 56,12,500

    CALULATION OF DEPRECIATION BY FIXED INSATALLMENT

    METHOD FOR MACHINE X & Y

    Particular Machine x Machine y

    Cost 56,12,500 56,12,500

    (-) scrap 3,00,000 3,00,000

    Actual value 53,12,500 53,12,500

    Life of machine 5 5

    Depreciation 10,62,500 10,62,500

    Depreciation = cost of machine / life of machine

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    35/54

    For machine X

    Year CFAT Depreciation Total

    CFAT

    PVIF ( 10%

    FOR 5 YEAR)

    PRESENT

    VALUE

    2013 3,37,500 10,62,500 14,00,000 0.90909 12,72,726

    2014 5,37,500 10,62,500 16,00,000 0.82645 13,22,320

    2015 7,37,500 10,62,500 18,00,000 0.75131 13,52,358

    2016 9,37,500 10,62,500 20,00,000 0.68301 13,66,020

    2017 11,37,500 10,62,500 22,00,000 0.62092 13,66,024

    Present value 66,79,448

    (+)scrap(3,00,000 * 0.62092) 1,86,276

    Total present value 68,65,724

    (-)Initial investment 71,15,000

    Net present value -2,49,376

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    36/54

    For machine Y

    Year CFAT Depreciation Total

    CFAT

    PVIF ( 10%

    FOR 5

    YEAR)

    PRESENT

    VALUE

    2013 11,37,500 10,62,500 22,00,000 0.90909 20,00,000

    2014 9,37,500 10,62,500 20,00,000 0.82645 16,52,900

    2015 7,37,500 10,62,500 18,00,000 0.75131 13,52,358

    2016 5,37,500 10,62,500 16,00,000 0.68301 10,92,816

    2017 3,37,500 10,62,500 14,00,000 0.62092 8,69,288

    Present value 69,67,362

    (+)scrap

    (3,00,000 * 0.62092)

    1,86,276

    Total present value 71,53,638

    (-)Initial investment 56,12,500

    Net present value 15,41,138

    Interpretation:-

    Profitability index is more than one is positive cash inflow to accept the project

    . In above estimation moil have to be select machine Y as compare to machine

    X. Because machine Y is positive as & machine X is negative. As per the rule

    of profitability index more than one is to accept the project & less than one or

    equal to one is to reject the project.

    Merits:

    This method explain weather the investment increases the firm values. Consider the time value of money and all cash flows. Consider the risk of future cash flows(using cost of capital. Useful in ranking and selecting when capital is rationed.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    37/54

    Demerits:

    May not give the correct decision when mutually exclusive projects istaken.

    Requires an estimation of cost of capital for calculation of Profitabilityindex.

    C .Internal Rate of Return:-

    The internal rate of return method is a discounted cash flow technique

    which takes into account the magnitude &timing of cash flows. The concept of

    IRR is return rate predict cut-off rate analysis for the actual return of the

    investment rate is compare that cut-off rate this rate is greater that project is

    good for them to accept.

    The internal rate of return can be defined as that rate which equates the

    present value of cash inflow with the present value of cash outflow. It is the rate

    at the which the NPV of the investment is zero, it is called Internal Rate because

    it is depends on the outlay and proceeds associated with the investment.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    38/54

    For Example:

    Moil Ltd has to be decided the estimate of the purchase of machinery for the

    beneficiary of the organisation in the future time. Two machinery are available

    to estimate that calculation of IRR.

    Cash outflow for both the Machinery Rs. 1,00,00,000

    Cash inflow of both the machinery:

    Year Machine X Machine Y

    2013 10,00,000 50,00,000

    2014 20,00,000 40,00,000

    2015 30,00,000 30,00,000

    2016 40,00,000 20,00,000

    2017 50,00,000 10,00,000

    Solution:

    Formula of Internal rate of return (IRR):

    IRR = % of Present Value of Positive NPV rate + NPV x Difference in

    % of NPV rate

    Difference in NPV

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    39/54

    For Machine X

    Year Cash in

    Flow

    PVIF (10%

    for 5 yrs)

    NPV PVIF (15%

    for 5 yrs)

    NPV

    2013 10,00,000 0.90909 9,09,090 0.86956 8,69,560

    2014 20,00,000 0.82645 16,52,900 0.75614 15,12,280

    2015 30,00,000 0.75131 22,53,930 0.65751 19,72,530

    2016 40,00,000 0.68301 27,32,040 0.57175 22,87,000

    2017 50,00,000 0.62092 31,04,600 0.49717 24,85,850

    Total Present Value 1,06,52,560 91,27,220

    Initial Investment (-

    )1,00,00,000

    (-

    )1,00,00,000

    Net Present Value 6,52,560 (-)8,72,780

    IRR= 10 % + (652560/ 1525340) * 5 %

    Internal Rate of Return (IRR) =12.14

    For Machine Y

    Year Cash in

    Flow

    PVIF (15%

    for 5 yrs)

    NPV PVIF (25%

    for 5 yrs)

    NPV

    2013 50,00,000 0.86956 43,47,800 0.80000 40,00,000

    2014 40,00,000 0.75614 30,24,560 0.64000 25,60,000

    2015 30,00,000 0.65751 19,72,530 0.51200 15,36,000

    2016 20,00,000 0.57175 11,42,500 0.40960 8,13,800

    2017 10,00,000 0.49717 4,97,170 0.32768 3,27,680

    Total Present Value 1,09,84,560 92,37,480

    Initial Investment (-

    )1,00,00,000

    (-

    )1,00,00,000

    Net Present Value 9,84,560 -7,62,520

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    40/54

    IRR= 15 % + (984560 / 1747080) * 10 %

    = 20.64 %

    Interpretation:-

    Internal rate of return is also depends of company cut-off rate like company is

    estimating minimum rate of return on machinery is 15%. More than return of

    cut-off rate is to be accept the project. Moil is to select the machine Y for the

    return of the investment more than cut-off rate i.e.20.64% is more than cut-off

    rate &another of machine X is less as compare to cut-off rate for that reason

    is to reject the machine X.

    Merits:

    This method explain wheather the investment increases the firm values. Consider the time value of money and all cash flows. Consider the risk of future cash flows(using cost of capital.

    Demerits:

    May not give the correct descison when mutually exclusive projects istaken.

    Requires an estimation of rate of return for calculation of IRR.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    41/54

    CHAPTER 6:

    Proposed Project & Expansion

    MINE EXPANSION PROJECTS UNDERTAKEN BY MOIL (MOU-2013-

    14)

    Sr.

    No.

    Description of Project Status Benefits from the Project

    1 Sinking of vertical shaft4.5 mtr. dia and 156mtr. depth with winder,headgear, surface

    infrastructure, ore

    passes, second outlet, ,loading stations etc. andallied works at MunsarMine.

    Installation ofpermanent headgearcompleted. Sinking,Lining, equipping and

    installation of

    permanent winder inprogress. Project isrunning as per schedule.

    Projected production from this shaft is0.60 lac. Ton per year from 2018-19.

    Scheduled completion of the project isin May-2014. After completion of theproject, underground development to

    approach to the ore zone will beundertaken at different working levels.Schedule for Start & completion ofunderground development activities-

    2014-15- 2016-17 - 1st. level(40mtrs)

    2015-16- 2018-19 - 2nd

    . Level(70mtrs)

    2015-16- 2018-19 - 3rd

    . level(100mtr)

    2016-172019-20 - 4th

    . level(130mtr.)

    Present production is 0.15 lac. Ton peryear from underground. Yearwise

    Projected production from this shaft is2014-15- 0.20 lac Ton2015-16- 0.30 lac Ton2016-17- 0.40 lac Ton2017-18- 0.50 lac Ton

    2018-19- 0.60 lac Ton

    2. Sinking of vertical shaft4.5 mtr. dia and 134mtr. depth with winder,headgear, surfaceinfrastructure, orepasses, second outlet, ,loading stations etc. andallied works at UkwaMine.

    Installation ofpermanent headgearcompleted. Sinking,Lining, equipping andinstallation ofpermanent winder inprogress. Project isrunning as per schedule.

    Projected production from this shaft is0.65 lac. Ton per year from 2019-20.

    Scheduled completion of the project isin August-2014. After completion of theproject underground development toapproach to the ore zone will beundertaken at different working levels.Schedule for Start & completion ofunderground development activities-

    2014-15- 2017-18 - 1st. level (60mtr)

    2015-16- 2018-19 - 2nd

    . Level(90mtr)

    2015-16- 2018-19 - 3rd

    . level(120mtr)

    Present level of production fromunderground is 0.30 lac. Ton per year

    through Inclines. Projected productionfrom this shaft is

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    42/54

    2016-17- 0.35 lac Ton2017-18- 0.40 lac Ton2018-19- 0.55 lac Ton2019-20 0.65 lac. Ton

    3. Deepening of Holmesshaft from 12

    th.

    level(300mtrs.) to 16level (435 mtrs.) 135mtrs.

    At Balaghat Mine

    Work started from Nov.2012 and preparatorywork such as sinkingwinder chamber,orepass chamber, drivefor head/deflectionpully at 12th. level(300mtrs.) completed.Installation of sinkingwinder and sinking oforepass at 12

    th. level

    (300mtrs.) in progress.

    Scheduled completion of the project isin Nov.-2016.

    Deepening of Holmes shaft is beingundertaken to sustain the production andalso to increase of production by 0.60

    lac. Ton per year.

    Present level of production is 3.0 lac.Ton per year. By deepening ofProduction shaft (project completed in

    2011) & corresponding undergrounddevelopment at 13.5 L(345 mtrs.) &

    15L (390mtrs.) it will go upto 3.60 lac.

    Ton per year by 2015-16.By the deepening of Holmes shaft and

    corresponding underground

    development at 16L(435 mtrs.)production will go upto 4.20 lac. Ton

    per year by 2017-18.

    4. Sinking of 7.5 mtrs. dia.650 mtrs. depth verticalhigh speed shaft withthree nos. frictionwinders and allied

    works at Balaghat

    Mine

    Global tendering done ,offers received in threeparts. Scrutiny andtechnical discussion ofPart-I in progress.

    Projected production from this shaft is8.0 lac. Ton per year

    Scheduled completion of the project isin 2016-17 . After completion of theproject underground development toapproach to the ore zone will beundertaken at different working levels.Schedule for Start & completion ofunderground development activities-

    2016-17- 2018-19 - 16.5 level(435 mtrs.)

    2017-18- 2019-20 - 18 level(480 mtrs.)

    2017-18- 2019-20 - 19.5 level(525 mtrs.)

    2018-19- 2020-21 - 21 level(570 mtrs.)

    2018-19- 2021-22 - 22.5 level(615 mtrs.)

    Projected production from this shaft is2017-18- 0.60 lac Ton2018-19- 1.00 lac Ton2019-20- 2.50 lac Ton2020-21- 4.00 lac Ton2021-22- 5.00 lac Ton2022-23- 6.00 lac Ton2023-24- 7.00 lac Ton2024-25- 8.00 lac Ton

    5. Deepening of vertical

    shaft from -270level(109 mtrs.) to -

    Placement of work

    order is expected inFeb.- 2013.

    Shaft deepening is being done to sustainthe production of chikla Mine which is0.80 lac. Ton per year.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    43/54

    470 level(169 mtrs.),60 Mtrs. ,size of theshaft is circular having4.5 Mtrs. Diameter at

    Chikla Mine.

    Scheduled completion of the project isin Aug.- 2015. After completion of theproject underground development toapproach to the ore zone will beundertaken at different working levels.

    Schedule for Start & completion ofunderground development activities-2015-16- 2017-18 - 3

    rd.. level(139 mtrs.)

    2016-17- 2018-19 - 4th

    . level(169 mtrs.)

    6. Sinking of 6.5 Mtrs.Dia., 308 Mtrs. depth

    2nd

    . High speed shaftwith 2 nos. frictionwinders, headgear,surface infrastructure,

    ore passes, secondoutlet, , loading stationsetc. at Gumgaon Mine.

    Work of Designing ofshaft installation and

    preparation/ evaluationof Feasibility reportawarded to M/sCMPDIL Ranchi which

    is in progress.Pre-inception studiessuch as core drilling &

    Hydrogeology at thelocation of shaft is inprogress.

    It will work in new ore zone located inwestern part of the ore body to extractthe ore from the levels below- 4Level(190mtrs.)

    Projected Production from this shaft is1.30 Lac. Ton per year after

    corresponding undergrounddevelopment for approach to ore bodyat different underground levels.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    44/54

    CHAPTER 7:Business Diversification:

    Wind farms project of Moil at Ratedi Hill, Dist. Dewas (M.P.) for4.80 MW

    (6 units).

    Introduction to wind farms

    MOIL is the first public sector company in the country to

    install wind farms for captive power requirement and to promotenon conventional energy resources.

    During 2005-2006 MOIL has commissioned a 4.80 MW wind

    farm at NAGDA hills wind farm at NAGDA hills near DEWAS in

    MP.

    Another wind farm of 15.20 MW consisting 19 nos wind

    turbines of 800 KW each commissioned at PATEDI hills.

    Total wind energy capacity of MOIL ltd is 20.00 MW.

    MOIL wind farm has generated 1755.10 lakh has genereated

    17655.10 lakh units of electricity since its inception.

    20 MW Wind mill at Nagda and Ratedi near Dewas(MP)

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    45/54

    Capital Budgeting of 4.80 MW machinery at NAGDA PROJECT

    using

    Non discounted cash flows:

    1 .Total investment of the project is to be taken from internal cash

    no debt (loan to be taken) for installing the project.

    2 .Cost of capital is assumed to be 14% as if company not using

    this 15 crore cash in this investment then company get an annual

    return of 14% through investment which is the opportunity cost of

    capital.

    3 .Rate of return for this project is to be taken as 15.855.

    4 .The estimated life of the project is for 10 years.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    46/54

    1.Payback period:

    4.80 Nagda project(6 units)(in crores)

    year Investment Gross revenue cash expenses cash profit Cumm cash

    profitgross 22.2

    Investment

    2006-2007

    Less-TAXbenefit

    7.326

    at33%

    Net 14.874

    2006-2007 2.94 0 2.94 2.94

    2007-2008 4.01 0 4.01 6.952008-2009 4.8 0.24 4.56 4.56

    2009-2010 4.46 0.3 4.16 8.72

    20010-2011 4.21 0.31 3.9 12.62

    20011-2012 5.7 0.3 5.4 18.02

    Interpretation :

    Payback period=no of years+(cash outflow-required cash inflow)/annual

    cash inflow*12.

    Since on 5 year 12.62 crore is recovered

    Therefore Payback period= 5+(14.874-12.62)/3.9*12= 5 years 6 monthsSo payback period is 5 years 6 months

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    47/54

    2.Discounted payback period:

    4.80 Nagda project(6 units)(in crores)

    Year Investment Grossrevenue cashexpenses cashprofit Pv Cummpv

    gross 22.2

    Investment

    2006-2007

    Less-TAXbenefit 7.326

    at 33%

    Net 14.874

    2006-2007 2.94 0 2.94 2.578968 2.578968

    2007-2008 4.01 0 4.01 3.085294 5.664262

    2008-2009 4.8 0.24 4.56 3.077544 8.741806

    2009-2010 4.46 0.3 4.16 2.463136 11.20494

    20010-2011 4.21 0.31 3.9 2.02566 13.2306

    20011-2012 5.7 0.3 5.4 2.46024 15.69084

    Discounted payback period:5 years 6 months

    Interpretation:Discounted payback period is 5 years 6 months.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    48/54

    Capital Budgeting of 4.80 MW machinery at NAGDA PROJECT using

    Discounted cash flows:

    1.Calculation by using NPV

    4.80 Nagda project(6 units) Rs. in crores

    Year InvestmentGrossrevenue

    cashexpenses

    cashprofit

    NPV at14%

    PVF @14.85%

    NPV at14.85%

    grossinvestment

    22.2

    2006-2007

    Less-TAXbenefit

    7.326

    at 33%

    Net 14.874

    2006-2007 2.94 0 2.94 2.578968 0.8707 2.559858

    2007-2008 4.01 0 4.01 3.085294 0.7581 3.039981

    2008-2009 4.8 0.24 4.56 3.077544 0.66 3.0096

    2009-2010 4.46 0.3 4.16 2.463136 0.5747 2.390752

    2010-2011 4.21 0.31 3.9 2.02566 0.5004 1.95156

    2011-2012 5.7 0.3 5.4 2.46024 0.4357 2.35278

    PV of

    cashprofit:

    15.69 15.30453

    Interpretation:1.PV of cash profit@ 14%=15.69

    Less:Initial investment=14.874

    Net present value=0.816

    2.PV of cash profit @ 14.85%=15.30453

    Less:Initial investment=14.874

    Net present value:0.4303.Therefore Discounted factor should be more than 15 % so that the NPV come

    close to Zero.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    49/54

    2. Calculation by using IRR.

    Interpretation:

    P.V required=14.874

    P.V at 15.85%=14.86904

    P.V at 16%=14.80626

    Actual IRR should be more than 16%.

    4.80 MW Nagda project(6 units) rupees in crores.

    Year Investment

    Gross

    revenue

    cash

    expenses

    cash

    profit

    Irr at

    15.85% Npv

    Irr at

    16% Npv

    Gross 22.2

    Investment

    2006-2007

    Less-TAX

    benefit 7.326at33%

    Net 14.874

    2006-2007 2.94 0 2.94 0.8631 2.537514 0.862 2.53428

    2007-2008 4.01 0 4.01 0.745 2.98745 0.74316 2.980072

    2008-2009 4.8 0.24 4.56 0.6431 2.932536 0.6406 2.921136

    2009-2010 4.46 0.3 4.16 0.5551 2.309216 0.5523 2.297568

    20010-2011 4.21 0.31 3.9 0.4792 1.86888 0.47611 1.856829

    20011-2012 5.7 0.3 5.4 0.4136 2.23344 0.41044 2.216376

    Total Cash

    profit 14.869 14.8063

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    50/54

    3. Calculation by using profitability index:

    4.80 Nagda project(6 units)(in crores)

    Year InvestmentGrossrevenue

    cashexpenses

    cashprofit

    PVF @14% PV

    gross 22.2

    Investment

    2006-2007

    Less-TAXbenefit 7.326

    at 33%

    Net 14.874 1.14 -16.91

    2006-2007 2.94 0 2.94 0.8772 2.578968

    2007-2008 4.01 0 4.01 0.7694 3.085294

    2008-2009 4.8 0.24 4.56 0.6749 3.077544

    2009-2010 4.46 0.3 4.16 0.5921 2.463136

    20010-2011 4.21 0.31 3.9 0.5194 2.02566

    20011-2012 5.7 0.3 5.4 0.4556 2.46024

    Profitability Index:1.054917

    Interpretation:

    Since profitability index is greater than 1 so the project can be accepted.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    51/54

    Chapter 8:

    CONCLUSION:

    Project appraisal By various

    techniques

    Rate Values

    Non Discounted Cash Flows:

    1.payback Period: 5 years 6

    months

    2.Discounted Payback Period; 5 years 6

    months

    Discounted Cash Flows:

    1.Net Present Value @ 14% 0.816

    @14.85% 0.4303

    2.Iinternal Rate of Return: @15.85% 14.86904

    @16% 14.806

    3.Profitability Index: 1.04917

    Payback period for the Nagda project is 5 years 6 months that means theactual investment is gained during 5 years 6 months after this the

    whatever cash inflow is generated is the profit for the company.

    Net present value comes to be positive at the both rate 14% and 14.85%. IRR to be taken as 15.85% but it to be estimated that it should be more

    than 16% so that the net present value comes to be zero.

    Profitability index is greater then 1 which concludes that project has goodfuture growth and profitable for the company to accept this project.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    52/54

    In MOIL for Capital Budgeting Discounted cash flow technique IRR isused for project appraisal and since NPV is positive for 15.85% if IRR as

    discounted factor so the project is effective for the company

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    53/54

    Chapter 9.

    Suggestions

    MOIL has different user tailor made software for all departments, I suggestto get it ERP, so that each &every report can be accruable at one point.

    Projects- I suggest MOIL should monitor each & every Project to ensuretimely completion, so that it would not be overrun in terms of cost & time.

    By improving better quality, MOIL can ensure much better price & turnover.MOIL has large cash reserves; I suggest company may invest in other project

    or other value addition segments.

    Permission from ministry & finalization process is very slow, project goesunder cost overrun.

  • 7/28/2019 Prinkal Final One

    54/54

    References & Bibliography:

    Books:

    1. Financial Management Author: Ravi Kishore.

    2. Financial Management Author: I. M. Pandey

    Websites: www.moil.nic.

    Annual Reports: 2006-2007 to 2011-2012 of MOIL