p.roce$$ optimi$ation $a ng$*turnellcorp.com/publications/worldcement1999-pos.pdf · thereby...

5
PROCE$$ OPTIMI$ATION $A� NG$* J. Tume, PE., PresEnnmencal Engmeer, gmr i n g Corp., U, expes methods of increasing the value of c api t al mvesrmenrs by optimising manucturing pses, mcrsing production and rung rmg costs. Q ANS � RffER TOTHl SC SECnON AT T BACK Of T E Introduon Cement plant owners, managers and te<hnical per- nnel are constantly searching for ways to Increase lhe value of capital investmenʦ by optimising manu- facturing processes. Increasing production and 1e duclng operating costs. This article presents meth- ' . ' r -chieving these objectives nd includes sever- examples. including optimising clinker cooler ration, heat transfer, and combustion conditions; r educing air infiltration; adding alteate fuels; and omproving cement bagging operations. The manu- facturing process optimisation studies presented sug- gest methods of reducing production unit costs and creasing production capacity which are achievable through operational changes and small capital Intmenʦ and which result in higher returns on 1nvesrment (ROI). The operating plants reviewed have shown significant potential savings and produc- tion Increases with minimum additional capital Investment. tential savings from lowering specific fuel con- sumption and increasing clinker production are cal- wlated using mathematical modelling resultS. The s and energy balances are calculated on the kiln system using input variables based on actual operat- Ing conditions at existing plants, which emphasise lhe validity of the results. The heat capacities of ele- ments and compounds were calculated using equa- tions obtained from rry's emil Enginee' '- Pyroprocessing system pyrops ing system presents the opportunity lo 1 the most optimal amount of savings. The main operating costs are fuel and elecical power. A comparison of the specific fuel consumption of 1 kiln system with other kiln systems of similar gn provides an indication of how efficiently the is operating. This also suggesʦ what can be hieved by improvements and optimisations. wever, other reasons for different specific fuel sumption must also be considered. Following are examples of improvements and tlmisations of various subsystems in a pyroprocess- g system, and illustrations how they are hieved, how they afft specific fuel consumption and clinker production, and the extent of tential savings and benefits associated with these optimisa- tions. The potential savings shown in these examples do not take into account any savings in electrical power, maintenance, or labour. Savings in electrical power will result whenever there is a reduction in specific fuel consumption because a lower gas flow rate per ton of clinker produced. This lowers the power nsumed in the kiln system onduced draft (10) fan. In these examples, potential savings or income resulting from additional production are calculated based on an incremental savings or income of USS 2 of clinker. mker cꝏler Clinker coolers have two major functions in a pyre- processing system: to supply hot combustion air to the kiln and to lower the clinker temperature for material handling after the kiln system. An Ideal clinker cooler discharges clinker at a temperature close to ambient with all the heat re<overed from the clinker used to raise combustion a1r tempera- ture or for other purposes, such as drying coal or raw materials. Clinker cooler efficiency is measured by the percentage of useful heat recovered from clinker. With grate coolers, kiln operators have significant control over combustion air temperature and hence, clinker cꝏler efficiency. Combustion air temperature from grate coolers is controlled by clinker bed depth and air flow rate. Typically, as bed depth increases, does combustion air temperature. Maximum bed depth is limited by one of the following: undergrate fan capacities, the grate drive. or overheating in the kiln firing hood area. In contrast, with planetary coolers, kiln operators do not have much control over the efficiency of the cooler. However, the operator can ensure all observa- tion pos and doors are closed to minimise the infil- tration of cooler ambient air. The effects of increasing secondary air tempera- ture on clinker production, specific fuel consump- tion, and clinker cooler efficiency for a preheater kiln equipped with a grate cooler are shown i n a dl C T , v CEMENT Ma 1999 91

Upload: others

Post on 23-Oct-2020

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • P.ROCE$$ OPTIMI$ATION $A� NG$*

    i1clor J. Tume/1, P.E., Process/EnVI(onmencal Engmeer, Penta Engmeering Corp., USA, explores methods of increasing the value of capital mvesrmenrs by optimising manufacturing processes, mcreasing production and reducing operarmg costs.

    QT\l! II'ANISH TAANSLAHON. PU� RffER TOTHl Sl't:CIAl SECnON AT THE BACK Of THE ISSUE

    Introduction Cement plant owners, managers and te

  • Figure I. In this example, the kiln exit gas flow rate was held at a constant level and the fuel firing rate, clinker production and clinker cooler efficiency were allowed to vary.

    Kiln operators at a number of plants vosoted main· taon shallower clinker bed depths than could be achoevable Wlth the existing undergratc fans. By oncreasing and optimising clinker bed depth, koln operators can increase combustion aor temperature and hence, clonker cooler efficiency. In some cases, it may be c

  • -

    Operattonal changes resulttng from drueastng luln ftnng hood leakage from 10� of the total air entenng the ktln to 2% on a preheater kiln system wi th a grate cooler are shown in Table 2.

    1- 2. R....,tts of cH

  • ing items may significantly improve heat transfer efficiency in the kiln system:

    • Refractory system in the kiln, pre· heater and cooler.

    • The chain system of kilns equipped with a chain system.

    • Preheater vessel thimbles. • Preheater meal distribution boxes dis

    charging materials from one preheater vessel to other.

    • Airlocks at the preheater vessels' discharge.

    • Preheater cyclones including inlets and other areas.

    r • 2 � .,

    a m � " .!i

    1(; 12 ij 4 0

    ... "li

    ·12 -16

    0

    8

  • Alternative fuels Table 5. l'olmtial �vlngs of reduong kan exit gM � �>«•tentage to.-In all the examples illust rated above, the objective was to reduce specific fuel con· sumption and oncrease clinker production. Thos example presents alternatove fuels that may be fully or partially substituted for existing fuels to reduce fuel costs. Fuels used in some cement plants as either the main fuel or as a supplement onclude natural gas, fuel oils, coal, petroleum coke, tyres, domestic refuse, rice husks, wood chips and a wide range of waste sol· vents and other organic liquids.

    pro

    Numerous older technology packing machines. which use mechanical weights on a balance, are cur· rently in operation. In some cases, these packong mach1nes cause bag weoghts to vary by as much as 3%. Therefore, to ensure the minimum weight In each bag, the plant will typically put an additional 2 3% of cement on each bag

    In recent years, improvements made to packong machones have yielded machines with significantly more control of the weight of each bag. Weight tol· erances in the range of 0.5% are now achoevable.

    These weoght tolerances are achreved by the fol lowong:

    • Placing a weighing devoce after the bag packtr that feeds back the weight of each bag to the packing machine.

    • Installing a bag filling system that constantly adjusts the amount of cement based on the feed back obta1ned from the wcoghing devKe

    • Installing hardware and software to accomplish th� control descrobed above.

    Some plants may obtaon significant savongs by reduc ing the weight varoation from bag to bag For exam· pie, on a plant selling 500 000 tpa of cement 1n bags at a production cost of USS4011. a 1% reduction of ctlment per bag could potentially save the plant approximately USS 200 000/yr.

    Conclusion This article has presented a number of examples of potential savings achievable by operational changft and small capital onvestmcnts, includrng OPtimlsmg clinker cooler operation, reducing air lnfoltration. optr mising heat transfer, optimising combustion condr· tions, using alternate fuels and t6ntrolling cement bag we1ght variations These potential savings provide an order of magnotude saving, which may vary accordrng to existing plant operating conditions and product ron.

    It is important to stress that these are only a sele Ch n -' f"9"'«" 110.-. S.•th

    Edttlon. Tobie l· t81 l. GONZALEZ. ,,.. �, 'TM SOuth Ar.,..ocan C.mtnt Industry: M

    0vef'Vtew', Pr�'Jenttd .ar r� Jlth IEEE C�nt lnduJUy T�tvwM C0t1fttt·�

    Enquiry no: 12

    WORLD CEMENT M