reinventing quality 2010

33
Reinventing Quality 2010

Upload: others

Post on 09-Nov-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reinventing Quality 2010

Reinventing Quality 2010

Page 2: Reinventing Quality 2010

Used for the wrong reasons◦ Failure of other treatment methods◦ Staff convenience◦ Power struggles

Not evidence-based practice

Unwanted outcomes: Injuries including: Coma Broken bones Bruises Cuts requiring stitches Facial damage

Interference with relationship with caregiver

THERE IS A BETTER WAY!!!

Deaths due to: Asphyxiation Strangulation Cardiac arrest Blunt trauma

Page 3: Reinventing Quality 2010

Critical information for organizational leaders and most especially staff…◦ Part of our inherited culture is the use of restraint as a “therapeutic technique” and a safety measure ◦ We now know that restraint can be prevented◦ Prevention in key

Page 4: Reinventing Quality 2010

Restraint elimination involves significant culture change

Start with knowing and identify factors that contribute to an environment in which restraints are likely to be used

Page 5: Reinventing Quality 2010

TO START: Develop a Restraint Reduction Action PlanAction Plan FrameworkPrevention-Based ApproachContinuous Quality Improvement PrinciplesIndividualized for the Facility or AgencyAdopt/Adapt Six Core Strategies ©Baseline Data Collection

Page 6: Reinventing Quality 2010

Public Health Prevention Approach Self-Determination Principles Individual and Staff Experiences Trauma Informed Care Leadership Principles CQI (Continuous Quality Improvement)

Page 7: Reinventing Quality 2010

Primary Prevention (Universal Precautions)◦ Prevent conflict from occurring by anticipating

risk factors

Secondary Prevention (Selective Interventions)◦ Minimize and resolve conflicts when they occur

Tertiary Prevention (Indicated Interventions)◦ Debriefing/CQI: Post restraint interventions to

mitigate effects, analyze event, take corrective action and avoid reoccurrence

Page 8: Reinventing Quality 2010

1998: Hartford Courant Series January 1, 2001 – DDA ban on prone physical restraints 2001: Institute of Medicine Report “Crossing the Quality

Chasm 2003: Maryland Developmental Disabilities Administration

(DDA) ban on supine physical restraints 2005: National Association of State Mental Health Program

Directors NASMHPD Medical Directors’ (NASMHPD) Training Curriculum – Six Core Strategies

2007: DDA Adaptations to Six Core Strategies 2008: DDA announces restraint elimination initiative –

establishes Trauma Informed Care Restraint Elimination Task Force

2010: Eliminating Restraints in Maryland – Task Force Report to DDA

Page 9: Reinventing Quality 2010

Restraint can be a source of trauma experience

Restraint may have happened during the trauma event, especially during sexual assault

May trigger re-experiencing the trauma event

Page 10: Reinventing Quality 2010

What is trauma? Definition (NASMHPD, 2004):◦ The personal experience of interpersonal violence including

sexual abuse, physical abuse, severe neglect, loss, and/or the witnessing of violence, terrorism, and disasters.

Trauma also includes verbal and emotional abuse. Until recently, trauma exposure was thought to be unilaterally

rare (combat violence, disaster trauma)(Kessler et al., 1995)

56% of an adult sample (general population) reported at least one trauma event

(Ibid)

Page 11: Reinventing Quality 2010

Effects are neurological, biological, psychological and social in nature:◦ Changes in brain neurobiology◦ Social, emotional & cognitive impairment◦ Adoption of health risk behaviors as coping mechanisms

(eating disorders, smoking, substance abuse, self harm, sexual promiscuity, violence)◦ Severe and persistent behavioral health, health and social

problems, early death(Felitti et al, 1998; Herman, 1992)

Page 12: Reinventing Quality 2010

Five million crimes are committed against individuals with disabilities each year in the U.S. (Petersillia, 1998)

More than 90% of people with developmental disabilities will experience sexual abuse in their lifetime. (ARC, 1995)

Individuals with developmental disabilities are 4-10 times more likely to be victims of crime than people without a developmental disability (Wilson and Brewer, 1992)◦ Assault – 2.9 times higher◦ Sexual assault – 10.7 times higher◦ Robbery – 12.7 times higher

Page 13: Reinventing Quality 2010

NASMHPD, 2005

Page 14: Reinventing Quality 2010

142 deaths in the US from 1988 – 1998 due to S/R, reported by the Hartford Courant (Weiss, et. al, 1998)

111 fatalities over 10 years in New York facilities due to restraints (Sundram, 1994as cited by Zimbroff, 2003)

Page 15: Reinventing Quality 2010

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) estimates 44,000 – 98,000 medical error-related deaths occur each year. JCAHO receives only 400 medical-error death reports per year – less than 1% of the IOM estimate.

JCAHO implemented a Restraint Death Sentinel Event database in 1996. In 2005, the first 10 year report, 138 restraint deaths were reported.

Applying the IOM estimate to JCAHO data, there could be as many as 1,380 restraint related deaths per year in the US.Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/NR/rdonlyres/167DD821-A395-48FD-87F9-6AB12BCACB0F/0/Medical_Liability.pdf

Page 16: Reinventing Quality 2010

For every 100 mental health aides,26 injuries were reported as a result of a restraint in a three-state survey done in 1996

The injury rate in health care is higher than what was is reported for workers in:◦ Lumber◦ Construction◦ Mining industries

(Weiss et al., 1998; US Dept. of Labor, 2005)

Page 17: Reinventing Quality 2010

Ray, Myers, and Rappaport (1996) reviewed 1,040 surveys received from individuals following their New York State hospitalization

Of the 560 who had been restrained or secluded:

◦ 73% stated that at the time they were not dangerous to themselves or others

◦ 75% of these individuals were told their behavior was inappropriate (not dangerous)

17

Page 18: Reinventing Quality 2010

Holzworth & Wills (1999) conducted research on nurses’ decisions based on clinical cues of patient agitation, self-harm, inclinations to assault others, and destruction of property Nurses agreed only 22% of the time When data were analyzed for agreement due to chance

alone, agreement was reduced to 8%

Nurses with the least clinical experience (less than 3 years) made the most restrictive recommendations

Page 19: Reinventing Quality 2010

Luiselli, Bastien, and Putnam (1998) conducted a behavioral analysis to explore contextual variables related to the use of mechanical restraints

Results: The most frequent antecedent to the use of mechanical restraints was a staff-initiated encounter

Page 20: Reinventing Quality 2010

Research indicates that cultural and social bias may exist.

Those more likely to be restrained:

◦ Younger and on more medications(LeGris, Walters, & Browne, 1999)

◦ Younger, male gender, and Black or Hispanic descent (Donovan et al., 2003; Brooks et al., 1994)

Page 21: Reinventing Quality 2010

Cochrane Review (2000)

◦ 2,155 articles, no controlled studies

◦ Restraint use efficacy and therapeutic value not established

◦ Serious adverse effects were cited

(Sailas & Fenton, 2000)

Page 22: Reinventing Quality 2010

Aversive and isolating interventions tend to be associated with a significant increase in negative behaviors and significant decrease in positive behaviors

Individuals who lack the capacity to understand contingency-based interventions may actually have counterproductive outcomes

(Papolos & Papolos, 1999)

Page 23: Reinventing Quality 2010

Numerous unfounded beliefs exist

Harm caused in restraints is well documented

Benefits of restraint use are not substantiated

Biases exist in the system

Not evidence-based practice

Significant culture change is required

Page 24: Reinventing Quality 2010

Announced by Michael Chapman, DDA Executive Director, in Spring 2008

Goal is elimination: “We know we will struggle to realize this with some people. We must continuously strive for elimination, rigorously debrief every restraint event and ensure that we are doing all we can to prevent future incidents.”

Established a joint Task Force with MACS in August 2008 – 18 members from government, provider and advocacy groups

Final report disseminated to DDA and MACS in July 2010 DDA management team is currently reviewing specific

recommendations

Page 25: Reinventing Quality 2010

Advocacy – 6 members

Behavioral Health – 12 members

Data – 9 members

Human Resources – 6 members

Implementation Strategies – 7 members

Leadership – 6 members

Quality – 9 members

Training – 12 members

Page 26: Reinventing Quality 2010

October 2008 - Town Hall meeting – What are the opportunities and challenges?

June 2009 - Forums in the four regions of Maryland

March - June 2009 - Six meetings with Behavioral Principles and Strategies (MD behavior supports and crisis prevention/intervention training) trainers statewide

2 conference presentations◦ MACS Direct Support◦ Arc MD Convention

July 2009 - Behavioral Health Town Hall meeting

November 2009 - Town Hall meeting to review draft Task Force recommendations

Page 27: Reinventing Quality 2010

General definition: Any physical, mechanical, or chemical technique or device

used to prevent or to intervene during an event for the purpose of restricting an individual's access to his or her body or to the environment. It is recognized that some devices or techniques can be used as restraints for some people and as support for others. This definition does not include techniques or devices used for physical or medical support.

The specific technique or device does not dictate whether or not it is a restraint. The intent of the use of the technique or device is the determining factor.

Page 28: Reinventing Quality 2010

Leadership toward organizational change Use of data to inform practice Workforce development Use of restraint prevention tools Self-advocate roles Debriefing activities

National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, National Technical Assistance Center, 2005

Page 29: Reinventing Quality 2010

Organizational Change DDA Providers

Trauma Informed Care Positive Behavior Supports Staff Support Advocacy and Community Support Funding Measuring Success and Project Testing

Page 30: Reinventing Quality 2010

What is RCA?◦ Systematic process for incident investigation Determines fundamental system deficiencies Questions are asked until no more questions exist or

can no longer be answered Identification of Root Causes and Latent Conditions

Page 31: Reinventing Quality 2010

Root Cause A cause that if corrected would prevent recurrence of this and

similar incidents Address underlying system issues, rather than single problems or

faults Can include system deficiencies, management failures,

inadequate competencies, performance errors, omissions, non-adherence to procedures and inadequate organizational communication

Latent Conditions Less apparent failures of the organization or design that

contributed to the occurrence of errors or allowed them to harm people

Identifying latent conditions attempts to answer the following question: What exists in the organization that allowed the root cause to exist?

Intended to have generic implications for the system as a whole

Page 32: Reinventing Quality 2010

DDA Pilot Project◦ 6 Providers◦ Examining feasibility and value of use of RCA in

community settings as a CQI tool

MD Patient Safety Center◦ Resource for training on safety and CQI/Root

Cause Analysis◦ Free resource to all DDA licensed providers http://www.marylandpatientsafety.org

Page 33: Reinventing Quality 2010

Diane DresslerStatewide Training

Coordinator & Housing Specialist

MD Developmental Disabilities Administration

[email protected]

Arnie DordickExecutive DirectorLangton Green, Inc.

[email protected]