report vhsc monitoring (may 2010 – march 2012)sihfwrajasthan.com/vhsc consolidated report.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Report
VHSC Monitoring
(May 2010 – March 2012)
For
NRHM
By
State Institute of Health and Family Welfare, Jaipur
S
Inbea fo
T
P(1(7
B
T
Ppa
Squcom
*A20
Summary
n the state, been trained obacklog of 3
or the training
he distribution
RI members 13.3%), NGO7.5%), other m
y and large fe
he OBC pres
articipants grarticipation w
omehow the uestion the Voncerned NG
meager 11.7%
As per the o011.
34,0
36,0
38,0
40,0
42,0
44,0
by the end ofout of total 4348157 (14.9%.
n of participan
– 25431 (11O Members - members- 887
emales predo
ence was we
roups predomwas from the a
groups had VHSC memb
GO. The partic% in general, th
rder from MD
Figure 1
000
000
000
000
000
000
No.
f March, 201440 VHSCs.) members y
nts (total 217
1.7%), ANM’s4995 (2.3%)
748 (40.8%)
ominated in th
ell palpable.
minantly had age group of 2
ascendant per list prepar
cipation of elehe pattern be
D NRHM, No
1: Total number
. Of VHSC's tra
37,50(86.3%
2, 4991 batcA total of 217et to be train
344 members
s- 15095 (6.9), MSS memb
he trainings.
their educati25-45 years.
presence of “red by DPMUected PRI memeing replicated
o trainings we
r of VHSC's train
ained T
09%)
SIHFW
ches covering7344 (85.1%)ed out of a to
s trained) is a
9%), AWW’s-bers - 5756
ion between
“Other MembU/BPMU and mbers who ud in almost al
ere conducte
ned May, 2010‐ M
Total VHSC's to
W: an ISO:9001:
g 37509 (86.3) members wotal of 25550
as follows:
32129 (14.8(2.6%), SHG
5-10th standa
bers” giving convieniently
ltimately woul the districts.
ed in the mon
March, 2012
o be trained
43,440
:2008certified ins
3%) VHSC’s ere trained le1 members in
8%), ASHA -2G members- 1
ard and max
enough reasy accepted bld have a say
nth of July-A
stitution
1
have eaving nvited
28853 16337
ximum
son to by the y, was
August
P
*Aasst
Figure
Percentage comtrainin
>
71
51
50 oAs per the reps 101.1% (Tartates the achie
2: Category wis
Percentmpletion of VHngs (%) >80
1-80
1-70
or less ports sent by Jgeted VHSC: evement of 10
40
se percentage of
tage wise disSC
1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20.21.22.23.24.25.26.27.1.2.1.2.1.
Jalore, Nodal 840; VHSC co
02.0 % (Target
2
7.50%
0.80%
f participants w
stribution of Districts
Ajmer Baran Churu Dungarpur Jhalawar Kota Sirohi Bharatpur Bundi
Jhunjhunu Jaisalmer Jalore* Sawai Madho Tonk Karauli Jaipur Bhilwara Jodhpur Rajsamand Bikaner Pali Chittorgarh* Pratapgarh Nagaur Hanumagarh Ganganagar Sikar
Dausa Barmer Alwar Dholpur Udaipur
NGO for VAAompleted: 849ted VHSC: 156
11.70%
1
2.3%2.60%
SIHFW
ho were trained
Districts and
opur
ATSALYA, the ).Like wise ch
64 VHSC comp
6.90%
14.80%
13.30%
W: an ISO:9001:
d (May, 2010‐ M
d their Noda
R
VA
SU
VACECCEC
ECAT-VI
MSSSUR
U
current achiehitttorgarh, thepleted: 1596)
%
:2008certified ins
March, 2012)
l NGOs NGO
RCDSSS GVT BCT BCT IIRD
RVHA AATSALYA
LUPIN RVHA
SRKPS URMUL
AATSALYA COEDECON COEDECON - BODHGRAMSHAKHA
S, RCDSSS RE, URMUL
RVHA MVSS ACF
CUTS CUTS RMKM URMUL MDVS BCT
MSGD SURE HPPI
LUPIN JJVS
evement was se report from
PRI
ANM
AWW
AS
NGO
MSS
SHG
Others
stitution
2
stated CUTS
SIHFW: an ISO:9001:2008certified institution
3
Distribution of districts according to No. of VHSCs and members trained (May, 2010- March, 2012) (At Places the percentage does not add upto 100 % because initially the NGO’s were not
maintaining seggeragated data base) District No. of
Blocks NGO No. of
Batches No. of VHSCs
Trained Actual No. members
Trained
Ajmer 8 RCDSSS 151 1049(92.1%)N=1139 7053(88.2%)N= 7999
Alwar 14 HPPI 160 1114(51.9%)N= 2145 6869(81.9%)N=8385
Banswara 8 VAAGDHARA 258 1473(98.9%)N=1489 10529(83.3%)N= 12647
Baran 7 GVT 143 1052(93.4%)N=1126 6767(90.8%)N= 7451
Barmer 8 SURE 174 1633(70.7%)N=2311 7822(75.5%)N=10360
Bharatpur 9 LUPIN 195 1451(99.8%)N=1454 9353(95.8%)N=9768
Bhilwara 11 MSS 187 1574(87.7%)N=1794 8334(79.5%)N=10479
Bikaner 5 MVSS 134 881(100.0%)N= 881 6249(90.5%)N=6903
Bundi 4 RVHA 129 883(99.8%)N=885 5760(93.2%)N=6181
Churu 6 BCT 125 881(99.2%)N=888 5074(84.2%)N=6024
Dausa 5 MSGD 110 769(72.3%)N=1064 4665(86.7%)N=5383
Dholpur 4 LUPIN 80 562(70.3%)N=799 3768(83.8%)N=4495
Dungarpur 5 BCT 126 859(95.4%)N=900 5553(87.4%)N=6354
Ganganagar 7 MDVS 258 2678(98.0%)N=2733 11814(88.7%)N=13314
Hanumangarh 3 URMUL 157 1775 (100.0%)N=1775 7350(93.1%)N=7896
Jaipur 13 VISHAKHA 286 1947 (90.1%)N=2161 12063(79.7%)N=15131
Jaisalmer 3 URMUL 81 680(100.0%)N=680 3736(87.2%)N=4279
Jalore 7 VAATSALYA 121 849(101.1%)N=840 5573(91.9%)N=6066
Jhalawar 6 IIRD 214 1492(100.0%)N=1492 9797(93.8%)N=10444
Jhunjhunu 8 SRKPS 131 1001(100.0%)N=1001 5855(91.3%)N=6413
Jodhpur 9 SURE 240 1588(83.1%)N=1912 10374(88.4%)N=11739
Karauli 5 ECAT 88 715(80.5%)N=888 3690(68.8%)N=5360
Kota 5 RVHA 116 802(98.6%)N=813 5141(92.4%)N=5565
Nagaur 11 RMKM 204 1565(93.4%)N=1676 8843(77.6%)N=11392
Pali 10 ACF 129 888(84.7%)N=1049 5810(86.4%)N=6727
Rajasamand 7 RVHA 153 958(98.9%)N=969 4878(78.2%)N=6240
Sawai Madhopur 5 CECOEDECON 100 727(96.4%)N=754 4684(92.0%)N=5089
Sikar 8 BCT 136 1229(98.1%)N=1253 5479(82.8%)N=6621
Sirohi 5 VAATSALYA 74 519(98.7%)N=526 3488(95.5%)N=3677
Tonk 6 CECOEDECON 151 1074(99.4%)N=1080 6062(80.7%)N=7512
Udaipur 11 JJVS 47 458(18.6%)N=2465 1853(64.1%)N=2893
Chittorgrah 11 CUTS 199 1596(102.0%)N=1564 8220(76.5%)N=10749
Pratapgarh 5 CUTS 108 787(84.3%)N=934 4838(81.1%)N=5965
Rajasthan 4991 37509(86.3%)N=43440 217344(85.1%)N=255501 • Udaipur , Chittorgarh and Pratapgarh were assigned to NGOs only in December, 2010
• Alwar , Bhilwara and Rajsamand started late
SIHFW: an ISO:9001:2008certified institution
4
Category wise distribution of participants of VHSC trainings (May, 2010- March, 2012)
District NGO
Actual Participants
(N) Category of participants
PRI ANM AWW ASHA NGO MSS SHG Others
Ajmer RCDSSS 7053 779
(11.0%) 384
(5.4%) 1226
(17.4%) 790
(11.2%) 168
(2.4%) 169
(2.4%) 1226
(17.4%) 2311
(32.8%)
Alwar HPPI 6869 805
(11.7%) 470
(6.8%) 101
(17.5%) 1152
(16.8%) 60
(0.9%) 88
(1.3%) 423
(6.2%) 2670
(38.9%)
Banswara VAAGDHARA 10529
1124 (10.7%)
488 (4.6 %)
1440 (13.7%)
1482 (14.1%)
11 (0.1%)
12 (0.1%)
24 (0.2%)
5948 (56.5%)
Baran GVT 6767 628
(9.3%) 386
(5.7%) 849
(12.5%) 884
(13.1%) 681
(10.1%) 0
(0.0%) 769
(11.4%) 2570
(38.0%)
Barmer SURE 7822 903
(11.5%) 788
(10.1%) 1308
(16.7%) 896
(11.5%) 254
(3.2%) 517
(6.6%) 726
(9.3%) 2430
(31.1%)
Bharatpur LUPIN 9353 1468
(15.7%) 532
(5.7%) 1167
(12.5%) 1267
(13.5%) 188
(2.0%) 246
(2.6%) 396
(4.2%) 4089
(43.7%)
Bhilwara MSS 8334 906
(10.9%) 537
(6.4%) 1301
(15.6%) 1085
(13.0%) 389
(4.7%) 8
(0.1%) 783
(9.4%) 3325
(39.9%)
Bikaner MVSS 6249 692
(11.1%) 502
(8.0%) 711
(11.4%) 736
(11.8%) 169
(2.7%) 179
(2.9%) 536
(8.6%) 2724
(43.6%)
Bundi RVHA 5760 716
(12.4%) 264
(4.6%) 734
(12.7%) 660
(11.5%) 7
(0.1%) 19
(0.3%) 62
(1.1%) 3298
(57.3%)
Churu BCT 5074 510
(10.1%) 511
(10.1%) 899
(17.7%) 913
(18.0%) 24
(0.5%) 18 (0.4%)
424 (8.4%)
1775 (35.0%)
Dausa MSGD 4665 638
(13.7%) 219
(4.7%) 619
(13.3%) 709
(15.2%) 143
(3.1%) 48
(1.0%) 370
(7.9%) 1919
(41.4%)
Dholpur LUPIN 3768 551
(14.6%) 286
(7.6%) 519
(13.8%) 572
(15.2%) 32
(0.8%) 54
(1.4%) 57
(1.5%) 1697
(45.0%)
Dungarpur BCT 5553 909
(16.4%) 656
(11.8%) 1053
(19.0%) 1018
(18.3%) 8
(0.1%) 9
(0.2%) 906
(16.3%) 994
(17.9%)
Ganganagar MDVS 11814 1236
(10.5%) 473
(4.0%) 1148
(9.7%) 1043
(8.8%) 190
(1.6%) 142
(1.2%) 1018
(8.6%) 6564
(55.6%) Hanumangarh URMUL 7350
893 (12.1%)
386 (5.3%)
669 (9.1%)
654 (8.9%)
688 (9.4%)
309 (4.2%)
610 (8.3%)
3141 (42.7%)
Jaipur VISHAKHA 12063
1126 (9.3%)
642 (5.3%)
2247 (18.6%)
1809 (15.0%)
66 (0.5%)
31 (0.3%)
472 (3.9%)
5670 (47.0%)
Jaisalmer URMUL 3736 648
(17.3%) 283
(7.6%) 428
(11.5%) 295
(7.9%) 211
(5.6%) 558
(15.2%) 806
(21.5%) 507
(13.6%)
Jalore VAATSALYA 5573
706 (12.7%)
620 (11.1%)
1012 (18.2%)
636 (11.4%)
4 (0.1%)
43 (0.8%)
208 (3.7%)
2344 (42.1%)
Jhalawar IIRD 9797 1027
(10.5%) 426
(4.3%) 1034
(10.6%) 1199
(12.2%) 50
(0.5%) 624
(6.4%) 361
(3.7%) 5076
(51.8%)
Jhunjhunu SRKPS 5855 719
(12.3%) 697
(11.9%) 1021
(17.4%) 1221
(20.9%) 36
(0.6%) 99
(1.7%) 164
(2.8%) 1898
(32.4%)
Jodhpur SURE 10374 919
(8.9%) 812
(7.8%) 1565
(15.1%) 1017
(9.8%) 1002
(9.7%) 865
(8.3%) 1517
(14.6%) 2677
(25.8%)
Karauli ECAT- 3690 490
(13.3%) 336
(9.1%) 773
(20.9%) 724
(19.6%) 23
(0.6%) 296
(8.0%) 30
(0.8%) 1018
(27.6%)
Kota RVHA 5141 554
(10.8%) 242
(4.7%) 653
(12.7%) 565
(11.0%) 70
(1.4%) 179
(3.9%) 249
(4.8%) 2629
(51.1%)
Nagaur RMKM 8843 1054
(11.9%) 902
(10.2%) 1479
(16.7%) 1516
(17.1%) 51
(0.6%) 282
(3.2%) 373
(4.2%) 3186
(36.0%)
Pali ACF 5810 671
(11.5%) 605
(10.4%) 961
(16.5%) 771
(13.3%) 104 (1.8%)
216 (3.7%)
211 (3.6%)
2271 (39.1%)
SIHFW: an ISO:9001:2008certified institution
5
Rajasamand RVHA 4878 728
(14.9%) 277
(5.7%) 803
(16.5%) 705
(14.5%) 14
(0.3%) 92
(1.9%) 139
(2.8%) 2121
(43.5%) Sawai Madhopur
CECOEDECON 4684
531 (11.3%)
322 (6.9%)
654 (14.0%)
559 (11.9%)
24 (0.6%)
23 (0.5%)
829 (17.7%)
1742 (37.2%)
Sikar BCT 5479 633
(11.6%) 492
(9.0%) 889
(16.2%) 948
(17.3%) 20
(0.4%) 11
(0.2%) 314
(5.7%) 2172
(39.6%)
Sirohi VAATSALYA 3488
404 (11.6%)
323 (9.3%)
518 (14.9%)
342
(9.8%) 6
(0.2%) 210
(6.1%) 504
(144%) 1181
(33.9%)
Tonk CECOEDECON 6062
779 (12.9%)
358 (5.9%)
815 (13.4%)
660 (10.9%)
199 (3.3%)
89 (1.5%)
816 (13.5%)
2346 (38.7%)
Udaipur JJVS 1853 226
(12.2%) 167
(9.0%) 343
(18.5%) 277
(14.9%) 22
(1.2%) 69
(3.7%) 64
(3.5%) 685
(37.0%)
Chittorgarh CUTS 8220 891
(10.8%) 457
(5.6%) 1363
(16.6%) 1013
(12.3%) 33
(0.4%) 52
(0.6%) 176
(2.1%) 4235
(51.5%)
Pratapgarh CUTS 4838 567
(11.7%) 252
(5.2%) 727
(15.0%) 735
(15.2%) 48
(1.0%) 199
(4.1%) 775
(16.0%) 1535
(31.7%)
Total 217344 25431
(11.7%) 15095(6.9%)
32129(14.8%)
28853(13.3%)
4995(2.3%)
5756 (2.6%)
16337(7.5%)
88748(40.8%)
Age distribution of Participants (May, 2010- March, 2012) District NGO Actual participants
(N) Age
< 25 25-45 >45 Ajmer RCDSSS 7053 1005(14.2%) 4753(67.4%) 1295(18.4%)
Alwar HPPI 6869 794(11.6%) 5279 (76.9%) 796 (11.6%)
Banswara* VAAGDHARA 10529 988(9.4%) 7411(70.4%) 706(6.7%)
Baran Gramin Vikas Trust 6767 1272(18.8%) 4654(68.8%) 840(12.4%)
Barmer SURE 7822 1788(22.9%) 4481(57.3%) 1334(17.1%)
Bharatpur LUPIN 9353 1186(12.7%) 6562(70.2%) 1605(17.2%)
Bhilwara MSS 8334 1333(16.0%) 5965(71.6%) 1036(12.4%)
Bikaner MVSS 6249 998(16.0%) 4067(65.1%) 1184(18.9%)
Bundi RVHA 5760 616(10.7%) 4603(79.9%) 541(9.4%)
Churu BCT 5074 753(14.8%) 3396(66.9%) 921 (18.2%)
Dausa MSGD 4665 789(16.6%) 3352(71.9%) 524(11.2%)
Dholpur LUPIN 3768 656(17.4%) 2553(67.8%) 559(14.8%)
Dungarpur BCT 5553 862(15.5%) 4033(72.6%) 658(11.8%)
Ganganagar MDVS 11814 1881(15.9%) 7763(65.7%) 2170(18.4%)
Hanumangarh URMUL 7350 1677(22.8%) 4460(60.7%) 1213(16.5%)
Jaipur VISHAKHA 12063 1594(13.2%) 8739(72.4%) 1730(14.3%)
Jaisalmer URMUL 3736 415(11.1%) 2719(72.8%) 602(16.1%)
Jalore VAATSALYA 5573 617(11.1%) 4060(72.9%) 896(16.1%)
Jhalawar IIRD 9797 1804(18.4%) 6450(65.8%) 1543(15.7%)
Jhunjhunu SRKPS 5855 663(11.3%) 4386(74.9%) 806(13.8%)
SIHFW: an ISO:9001:2008certified institution
6
Jodhpur SURE 10374 1674(16.1%) 6757(65.1%) 1943(18.7%)
Karauli ECAT-BODHGRAM 3690 563(15.3%) 2621(71.0%) 506(13.7%)
Kota RVHA 5141 690(13.4%) 3822(74.3%) 629(12.2%) Nagaur RMKM 8843 1138(12.9%) 4251(48.1%) 1152(13.0%)
Pali ACF 5810 756(13.0%) 3966(68.3%) 1088(18.7%)
Rajasamand RVHA 4878 764(15.7%) 3378(69.2%) 736(15.1%)
Sawai Madhopur CECOEDECON 4684 537(11.5%) 3734(79.7%) 413(8.8%)
Sikar BCT 5479 860(15.7%) 3718(67.9%) 901(16.4%)
Sirohi VAATSALYA 3488 510(14.6%) 2386(68.4%) 592(17.0%)
Tonk CECOEDECON 6062 1044(17.2%) 4274(70.5%) 747(12.3%)
Udaipur JJVS 1853 182(9.8%) 1346(72.6%) 325(17.5%)
Chittorgarh CUTS 8220 1163(14.1%) 6100 (74.2%) 957(11.6%)
Pratapgarh CUTS 4838 799(16.5%) 3428(70.9%) 611(12.6%)
TOTAL 217344 32371(14.9%) 149467(68.8%) 31559(14.5%)
Sex distribution of Participants (May, 2010- March, 2012)
District NGO Actual Sex M F
Ajmer RCDSSS 7053 1854(26.3%) 5199(73.7%) Alwar HPPI 6869 1452(21.1%) 5417(78.9%) Banswara VAAGDHARA 10529 3556(33.8%) 6973(66.2%) Baran GVT 6767 2729(40.3%) 4038(59.7%) Barmer SURE 7822 2527(32.3%) 5295(67.7%) Bharatpur LUPIN 9353 3521(37.6%) 5832(62.4%) Bhilwara MSS 8334 2685(32.2%) 5649(67.8%) Bikaner MVSS 6249 1970(31.5%) 4279(68.5%) Bundi RVHA 5760 2244(39.0%) 3516(61.0%) Churu BCT 5074 1182(23.3%) 3892(76.7%) Dausa MSGD 4665 1679(36.0%) 2986(64.0%) Dholpur LUPIN 3768 1401(37.2%) 2367(62.8%) Dungarpur BCT 5553 1101(19.8%) 4452(80.2%) Ganganagar MDVS 11814 4608(39.0%) 7206(61.0%) Hanumangarh URMUL 7350 3132(42.6%) 4218(57.4%) Jaipur VISHAKHA 12063 2707(22.4%) 9356(77.6%) Jaisalmer URMUL 3736 1288(34.5%) 2448(65.5%) Jalore VAATSALYA 5573 1774(31.8%) 3799(68.2%) Jhalawar IIRD 9797 3811(38.9%) 5986(61.1%) Jhunjhunu SRKPS 5855 842(14.4%) 5013(85.6%) Jodhpur SURE 10374 2568(24.8%) 7806(75.2%) Karauli ECAT‐BODHGRAM 3690 1007(27.3%) 2683(72.7%)
SIHFW: an ISO:9001:2008certified institution
7
Kota RVHA 5141 1792(34.9%) 3349(65.1%) Nagaur RMKM 8843 2037(23.0%) 4775(54.0%) Pali ACF 5810 1737(29.9%) 4073(70.1%) Rajasamand RVHA 4878 1094(22.4%) 3784(77.6%) Sawai Madhopur CECOEDECON 4684 1079(23.2%) 3605(77.0%) Sikar BCT 5479 1218(22.2%) 4261(77.8%) Sirohi VAATSALYA 3488 1032(29.6%) 2456(71.4%) Tonk CECOEDECON 6062 2209(36.4%) 3853(63.6%) Udaipur JJVS 1853 545(29.4%) 1308(70.6%) Chittorgarh CUTS 8220 3327(40.5%) 4893(59.5%) Pratapgarh CUTS 4838 1422(29.4%) 3416(70.6%)
TOTAL 216293 66886 (30.9%) 147378(68.1%)
Caste distribution of participants (May, 2010- March, 2012)
District NGO Actual trained (N)
Category
ST SC OBC Gen Ajmer RCDSSS 7053 188(2.7%) 911(12.9%) 4635(65.7%) 1319(18.7%) Alwar HPPI 6869 412(6.0%) 1756(25.6%) 3462(50.4%) 1239(18.0%) Banswara VAAGDHARA 10529 8031(76.3%) 185(1.8%) 343(3.3%) 520(4.9%) Baran GVT 6767 1964(29.0%) 1192(17.6%) 2746(40.6%) 865(12.8%) Barmer SURE 7822 458(5.9%) 1277 (16.3%) 5045(64.5%) 823(10.5%) Bharatpur LUPIN 9353 324(3.5%) 1574(16.8%) 5643(60.3%) 1812(19.4%) Bhilwara MSS 8334 970(11.6%) 1013(12.2%) 4078(48.9%) 2273(27.3%) Bikaner MVSS 6249 26(0.4%) 1662(26.6%) 3173(50.8%) 1388(22.2%) Bundi RVHA 5760 1427(24.8%) 806(14.0%) 2257(39.2%) 1270(22.0%) Churu BCT 5074 58(1.1%) 1091(21.5%) 2758(54.4%) 1167 (23.0%) Dausa MSGD 4665 1428(30.6%) 775(16.6%) 1257(26.9%) 1205(25.8%) Dholpur LUPIN 3768 292(7.7%) 673 (17.9%) 1206(32.0%) 1597(42.4%) Dungarpur BCT 5553 3828(68.9%) 337(6.1%) 605(10.9%) 783(14.1%) Ganganagar MDVS 11814 27(0.2%) 4726(40.0%) 5850(49.5%) 1211(10.3%) Hanumangarh URMUL 7350 13(0.2%) 2315(31.5%) 4235(57.6%) 787(10.7%) Jaipur VISHAKHA 12063 1351(11.2%) 2177(18.0%) 5018(41.6%) 3517(29.2%) Jaisalmer URMUL 3736 188(5.0%) 669(17.9%) 920(24.6%) 1959(52.4%) Jalore VAATSALYA 5573 418(7.5%) 1313(23.6%) 2882(51.7%) 960(17.2%) Jhalawar IIRD 9797 1298(13.2%) 1298(13.2%) 5389(55.0%) 1812(18.5%) Jhunjhunu SRKPS 5855 216(3.7%) 1427(24.4%) 3682(62.9%) 530(9.1%) Jodhpur SURE 10374 335(3.2%) 1685(16.2%) 6104(58.8) 2254(21.7 %)
Karauli ECAT 3690
800(21.7%) 522(14.1%) 1177(31.9%) 1191(32.3%) Kota RVHA 5141 968(18.8%) 1029(20.0%) 2405(46.8%) 739(14.4%)
Nagaur RMKM 8843 64(0.7%) 1092(12.3%) 4073(46.1%) 1585 (17.9%)
Pali ACF 5810 436(7.5%) 1263(21.7%) 2857(49.2%) 1254(21.6%)
Rajasamand RVHA 4878 345(7.1%) 603(12.4%) 2351(48.2%) 1579(32.4%)
SIHFW: an ISO:9001:2008certified institution
8
Sawai Madhopur CECOEDECON 4684
980(20.9%) 833(17.8%) 1761(37.6%) 1110(23.7%)
Sikar BCT 5479 193(3.5%) 854(15.6%) 3314(60.5%) 1118(20.4%)
Sirohi VAATSALYA 3488
1133(32.5%) 481(13.8%) 1030(29.5%) 844(24.2%) Tonk CECOEDECON 6062 862(14.2%) 865(14.3%) 2918(48.1%) 1417(23.4%)
Udaipur JJVS 1853 964(52.0%) 107(5.8%) 355(19.2%) 427(23.0%)
Chittorgarh CUTS 8220 1205(14.7%) 1123(13.7%) 3675 (44.7%) 2217(27.0%)
Pratapgarh CUTS 4838 3020(62.4%) 335(6.9%) 638(17.3%) 645(13.3%)
TOTAL 217344 34222(15.7%) 37969(17.5%) 98042(45.1%) 43417(20.0%)
Education level of participants (May, 2010- March, 2012)
District NGO Actual trained
(N) Education
IL 1-5th 5-10th 11-12th 12th Ajmer RCDSSS 7053 1527(21.7%) 1477(20.9%) 2822(40.0%) 676(9.6%) 551(7.8%)
Alwar HPPI 6869 621(9.0%) 1148(16.7%) 3619(52.7%) 784(11.4%) 697(10.1%)
Banswara VAAGDHARA 10529 426(4.0%) 3913(37.2%) 3668(34.8%) 746(7.1%) 329(3.1%)
Baran GVT 6767 539(8.0%) 1881 (27.8%) 3019(44.6%) 622(9.2%) 706(10.4%)
Barmer SURE 7822 857(11.0%) 2604(33.3%) 2598 (33.2%) 754(9.5%) 673(8.6%)
Bharatpur LUPIN 9353 638(11.6%) 2046(21.9%) 4562(48.8%) 1139(12.2%) 968(10.3%)
Bhilwara MSS 8334 1199(14.4%) 2041(24.5%) 3438 (41.3%) 93611.2%) 720(8.6%)
Bikaner MVSS 6249 850(13.6%) 2134(34.1%) 2404(38.5%) 438(7.0%) 423(6.8%)
Bundi RVHA 5760 1405(24.4%) 1194(20.7%) 2223(38.6%) 509(8.8%) 429(7.4%)
Churu BCT 5074 297(5.9%) 1364(26.9%) 2210(43.6%) 638(12.6%) 572(11.3%)
Dausa MSGD 4665 315(6.8%) 937(20.1%) 2359(50.6%) 461(9.9%) 593(12.7%)
Dholpur LUPIN 3768 346(9.2%) 882(23.4%) 1549(41.1%) 508(13.5%) 483(12.5%)
Dungarpur BCT 5553 186(3.3%) 1338(24.1%) 2668(48.0%) 848(15.3%) 513(9.2%)
Ganganagar MDVS 11814 1634(13.8%) 3203(27.1%) 4868(41.2%) 1160(9.8%) 949(8.0%)
Hanumangarh URMUL 7350 972(13.2%) 1539(20.9%) 3076(41.9%) 908(12.4%) 855(11.6%)
Jaipur VISHAKHA 12063 1358(11.3%) 2693(22.3%) 5581(46.3%) 1007(8.3%) 1424(11.8%)
Jaisalmer URMUL 3736 786(21.0%) 1172(31.4%) 833(23.6%) 569(15.2%) 348(9.3%)
Jalore VAATSALYA 5573 1760(31.6%) 1064(19.1%) 1824(32.7%) 481(8.6%) 444 (8.0 %)
Jhalawar IIRD 9797 1165(11.9%) 3337(34.1%) 3318(33.9%) 978(10.0%) 999(10.2%)
Jhunjhunu SRKPS 5855 181(3.1%) 841(14.4%) 3099(52.9%) 970(16.6%) 764(13.0%)
Jodhpur SURE 10374 2131(20.6%) 2990(28.8%) 3696(35.6%) 844(8.1%) 713(6.9%)
Karauli ECAT-BODHGRAM 3690 170(4.6%) 869(23.6%) 1827(49.5%) 414(11.2%) 410(11.1%)
Kota RVHA 5141 349(6.8%) 1488(28.9%) 2465(47.9%) 436(8.5%) 403(7.8%)
Nagaur RMKM 8843 791(8.9%) 1319(14.9%) 3084(34.9%) 805(9.1%) 815(9.2%)
SIHFW: an ISO:9001:2008certified institution
9
Pali ACF 5810 481(8.3%) 1400(24.1%) 2570(44.2%) 688(11.8 %) 671 (11.5%)
Rajasamand RVHA 4878 550(11.3%) 1283(26.3%) 2147(44.0%) 510(10.5%) 388(8.0%) Sawai Madhopur CECOEDECON 4684 450(9.6%) 1441(30.8%) 1994(42.6%) 367(7.8%) 432(9.2%)
Sikar BCT 5479 337(6.2%) 1089(19.9%) 2518(46.0%) 729(13.3%) 806(14.7%)
Sirohi VAATSALYA 3488 970(27.8%) 856(24.5%) 1163(33.3%) 291(8.3%) 208(6.0%)
Tonk CECOEDECON 6062 395(6.5%) 1762(29.1%) 2509(41.4%) 608(10.0%) 788(13.0%)
Udaipur JJVS 1853 84(4.5%) 624(33.7%) 798(43.1%) 185(10.0%) 162(8.7%)
Chittorgarh CUTS 8220 786(9.6%) 2134(26.0%) 3705(45.1%) 875(10.6%) 720(8.8%)
Pratapgarh CUTS 4838 538(11.1%) 1530(31.6%) 2082 (43.0%) 406(8.4%) 282(5.8%) TOTAL 217344 25094(11.5%) 55593(25.6%) 90346(41.6%) 22281(10.3%) 20238(9.3%)
The concept of telephonic monitoring was also added to keep an eye on each and every batch being
conducted at the block from the state level through the VHSC training and coordination unit at SIHFW.
All the batches, except those being physically monitored by Team SIHFW were screened telephonically to
gain knowledge of the quality of trainings.
The basic details were seeked through the round of questions to the trainers and few participants chosen
randomly.Noted details are then compiled and sent to consultant, NRHM on monthly basis.
SIHFW: an ISO:9001:2008certified institution
10
Report Introduction As community empowerment approach, the NRHM envisaged to put village health and sanitation committee as incharge for local decentralized planning & monitoring at the village level. With 43,440 VHSCs constituted across the state, it was a humangous task to sensitize the VHSC members towards health issues particularly in relation to their rights and duties
Village Health & Sanitation committee (VHSC) which is the fifth committee (Development Committee) of the Gram Panchayat level, is the key agency for developing Village Health Plan in view of the prevalent problematic health issues and execute pragmatic and prudent solutions in consultation with the stakeholders. Village Health Committees are the first step towards communitization of health care services and for making health as a people's movement.
This committee comprises of Panchayat representatives, ANM, MTW, Anganwadi workers, Teachers, Community health volunteers, ASHA besides representative from SHG, NGO, and MSS etc.
ASHA Sahyogini is the Convener for this Committee. Village Health Committee will facilitate in addressing the health needs of the entire village with the help of health providers and health institutions. VHSCs will play an important role in planning and monitoring of the health care services through community monitoring mechanism.
Composition of the Village Health & Sanitation Committee
To enable the Village Health & Sanitation Committee to reflect the aspirations of the local community especially of the poor households and women, it has been suggested that:
a. At least 50% members on the Village Health & Sanitation Committee should be women. b. Every hamlet within a revenue village must be given due representation on the Village
Health and Sanitation Committee to ensure that the needs of the weaker sections especially Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes are fully reflected in the activities of the committee.
c. A provision of at least 30% representation from the Non-governmental sector. d. Representation to women’s self-help group etc. on these committees etc. will enable the
Committee to undertake women’s health activities more effectively. e. Notwithstanding the above, the overall composition and nomenclature of the Village
Health & Sanitation Committees is left to the State Governments as long as these committees were within the umbrella of PRIs.
VHSC composition:
• Gram Panchayat members • ASHA, AWW, ANM • SHG leader • Village representative of any CBO • User group representative
Number of VHSC constituted in Rajasthan: 43,440
SIHFW: an ISO:9001:2008certified institution
11
Roles and Responsibilities of VHSC members • Awareness Generation • Supervision and Monitoring and Death Audit • Health problems Identification and development of a VHP • Feedback for corrective measures. • Maintenance of Village Health Register and Calendar • Ensuring Visits of MPW, ANM • Management of Untied fund for VHC
Role of Village Health Committee: Activities
a. Create Public Awareness about the essentials of health programs. b. Discuss and develop a Village Health Plan based on an assessment of the village
situation and priorities identified by the village community. c. Analyze key issues and problems related to village level health and nutrition activities,
give feedback on these to relevant functionaries and officials. Present annual health report of the village in the Gram Sabha.
d. Participatory Rapid Assessment: to ascertain the major health problems and health related issues in the village. Estimation of the annual expenditure incurred for management of all the morbidities may also be done. The mapping will also take into account the health resources and the unhealthy influences within village boundaries.
e. Maintenance of a village health register and health information board/calendar: The health register and board put up at the most frequented section of the village will have information about mandated services, along with services actually rendered to all pregnant women, new born and infants, people suffering from chronic diseases etc.
f. Ensure that the ANM and MPW visit the village on the fixed days and perform the stipulated activity; oversee the work of village health and nutrition functionaries like ANM, MPW and AWW.
g. Get a bi-monthly health delivery report from health service providers during their visit to the village.
h. Take into consideration all the problems of the community and the health and nutrition care providers and suggest mechanisms to solve it.
i. Discuss every maternal death or neonatal death that occurs in their village, analyze it and suggest necessary action to prevent such deaths. Get these deaths registered in the Panchayat.
j. Managing the Village health fund. Village Health Fund: Untied Fund An untied fund for VHCs- There is a provision of Rs.10, 000/- as untied funds for each VHSC per year. This untied fund is to be deposited in concerned Subcenters Account which is jointly operated by ANM and Sarpanch. The untied fund is utilized for demand generation for health care services, sanitation drives, emergency health care needs, rewards for exceptional work in health sector, publicity of MCHN days, RCH camps etc. The untied funds are to be used for the community actions for improvement of health status of the community, for any of the following activities: -
SIHFW: an ISO:9001:2008certified institution
12
a. As a revolving fund from which households could draw in times of need to be returned in installments thereafter.
b. For any village level public health activity like cleanliness drive, sanitation drive, school health activities, ICDS, Anganwadi level activities, household surveys etc.
c. In extraordinary case of a destitute women or very poor household, the Village Health & Sanitation Committee untied grants could even be used for health care need of the poor household.
d. The untied grant is a resource for community action at the local level and shall only be used for community activities that involve and benefit more than one household. Nutrition, Education & Sanitation, Environmental Protection, and Public Health Measures shall be key areas where these funds could be utilized.
e. Every village is free to contribute additional grant towards the Village Health & Sanitation Committee. In villages where the community contributes financial resources to the Village Health & Sanitation Committee untied grant of Rs.10, 000/-, additional incentive and financial assistance to the village could be explored. The intention of this untied grant is to enable local action and to ensure that Public Health activities at the village level receive priority attention.
Training of VHSC Capacity building of VHSCs for making them functional in terms of developing the Village Health Plan, monitoring of the health activities and to ensure the access and utilization of services by all villagers is the key objective of the training of VHSC. State has decided to organize the Training of VHSC in a cascading model, the monitoring of which is assigned to SIHFW besides coordinating trainings with the help of SPMU, DPMU and Nodal NGOs. Objectives of Constitution of VHSCs and Capacity Building (Training) of the members
• Communitization of Health Services • To ensure decentralized planning from village level • To ensure the community monitoring. • Promote access to improved health care specially the vulnerable groups. • Capacity building of PRIs
Training of trainers
a. State Level: SIHFW Rajasthan along with CHETNA and NRHM Rajasthan did conducted the sensitization meet for the 31 representatives of selected NGOs who in turn were expected to take up the task to reach with the process and messages to VHSC members across all the villages in Rajasthan that shall empower the community through VHSC to take collective decision on issues pertaining to Health and sanitation specific to a village.
• District Level- 6 selected trainers from each District –(2 from Health department and 4 NGO representatives) were to be trained at SIHFW to impart trainings at the block level as distict level trainers DTT Training Load for 34* 6= 204
• In total a strength of 196 district level trainers were trained. Later in the month of January, 2011 , another set of 16 district level trainers were trained , including the staff of newly selected nodal NGO from Chittorgarh, Pratapgarh and Udaipur were trained. Batch Size 30
SIHFW: an ISO:9001:2008certified institution
13
Batches- 7 at SIHFW 14 man days at SIHFW Time line –Feb- March 2010
b. Block Level – With a collaborative effort, department and concerned NGOs did train 6 trainers per block and a total of 1422 trainers were trained at block level. At District level Training load- 1422 Batch size- 40 1 or 2 batches on the basis of No. of Blocks Training by DPMU 6 trainers per block- 3 NGO, 1 Block ASHA Coordinator, 1 BPM, 1 free lance trainer Time line - March 2010
Training of Village Health Committee Members- The total training load is of approximate. The trainings at grass root level are being conducted by identified NGOs. SIHFW is the monitoring agency and provides supportive supervision.
Training Load: 2, 50,000 members Training Agency: Identified NGO in the district Time Span- One Year Batch Size – Minimum 49 members (7 VHSC in one batch) Total projected batches- 5000 Training Duration: Two Days Minimum attendance- 70% Responsibility of ensuring attendance- NGO and BPMU Venue- Panchayat Bhawan, Dharamshalas, Cost per batch Rs. 27,000/- April 2010- March 2011
Training material
Two Books- Trainers Guide - Reading material for members
• Development by SIHFW,VHAI and CHETNA • Field testing of reading material at Ajmer • Participatory Training Methodology
Printing of Modules
• Facilitators Guide- 5000 copies @ Rs. 45.81/- • Reading material- 1.50 lakh copies @ Rs. 27.77 /- • Printing through SIHFW
Content of training module and reading material • Determinants of Health • Burden of disease on families, community • Causes of diseases • Health institutions, Health Programmes, Service guarantees
SIHFW: an ISO:9001:2008certified institution
14
• Village Health Committees- Constitution, Roles and Responsibilities • Untied Funds for VHCs • Monthly meetings • Development of Village Health Plans • Community Monitoring
Selection of NGOs
1. Advertisement published on 20.1.2009 in two newspapers. 2. Eligibility criteria of the selection of NGOs was finalized with prior approval of NRHM-
a. Registration under Rajasthan Societies Registration Act 1958 or Companies Registration Act or Under Trust
b. At least 10 years working experience in health and especially community level interventions after its registration.
c. Experience of organizing the mass scale training of grass root level Government and Non government functionaries’ like PRIs, AWW, ASHAs, SHGs etc at mass scale (documentary evidence required with proof).
d. Annual Financial Turnover Rs. 50 Lacs excluding the land and building. e. Should have infrastructure for training like training space-hall (desirable but not
essential. However, the NGO should be in position to make provision thereof), LCD, OHP, Vehicle etc and qualified trainers.
f. Should have working experience and linkages with Government departments. Applications received: 100 against the advertisement. Each of the eligible NGO was assessed on scale and status of each applicant and the selection was finalized by the committee for VHSC training.
NGOs and District
S.No. Name and Address of NGO Representative District
1 Maharishi Dayanand Vikas Samiti, Sri Ganganagar 2 Humana People to People India Alwar 3 Shikshit Rojgar Kendra Prabandak Samiti Jhunjhunu 4 URMUL Hanumangarh and Jaisalmer 5 CECOEDECON Sawai Madhopur, Tomk 6 Maru Vikas Evam Shod Sansthan Bikaner 7 Indian Institute of Rural Development Jhalawar 8 Mata Shree Gomti Devi Jan Seva Nidhi Dausa 9 Vatsalya Jalore and Sirohi 10 Society to uplift Rural Economy (SURE) Jodhpur, Barmer 11 VAAGDHARA Banswada 12 Mewar Seva Sansthan Bhilwara 13 Gramin Vikas Trust Baran 14 EACAT-BODHGRAM Karauli 15 Ambuja Cement Foundation Pali 16 RCDSSS Ajmer 17 Rajasthan Mahila Kalyan Mandal Nagaur 18 Rajasthan Voluntary Health Association Kota, Bundi, Rajsamand 19 Bhoruka Charitable Trust Dungarpur, Sikar , Churu
SIHFW: an ISO:9001:2008certified institution
15
20 Lupin Human Welfare and Research Foundation Dholpur, Bharatpur 21 Vishakha Jaipur 22 CUTS Pratapgarh, Chittorgarh 23 Jagran Jan Vikas Smiti Udaipur Co-ordination Unit for VHSC
Coordination unit for VHSC training was established at SIHFW from 1.12.2009. One Consultant VHSC and four ROs are appointed (financial support from NRHM) and each of them has been made responsible for coordinating & monitoring the activities of VHSC training at districts.
Responsibility of Co-ordination Unit
• Coordination of the state level sensitization workshop on VHSC for the NGOs • Coordinating the Zonal level workshop. • Planning and coordinating the state level district training program. • Coordinating the block level training with the help of nodal NGOs • Monitoring of the block level training program. • Development of checklists for monitoring • Monitoring of Trainings at district and block level • Telephonic monitoring of each batch at block level. • Development of reports and documentation • Workshops and seminars
IEC-
The component of VHSC needs to be widely publicized, so that it could be robustly rooted in the institutional framework. The IEC were done through posters prepared and circulated by UNICEF. The issues like health rights, services to be rendered through PHC, CHC and subcenter, roles and responsibilities of committees were addressed through posters.
Objectives The project was taken up by State Institute of Health & family Welfare, Jaipur in the month of December, 2009 with the following objectives.
1. Training planning 2. Develpoment of formats /checklists/ Reading materials 3. Development of Reporting Mechanism 4. Generating the reports , its rnalysis and provision of feedbacks 5. Field level Monitoring, documentation and Evaluation 6. Involved in the development of Village Health Plans 7. Printing and Distribution of Training Modules and Reading Materials
DNTTTBTbltainrem
D
District: AjmeNGO: Roman
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
Batches comphe Trainings locks covered
arget coveringncluded 11.0%epresentative
members of VH
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
Percen
tage
of p
articipa
nts
Disrtrict spe
er Catholic Dioc
locks: 8
o be trained:
VHSC: 1049
pleted: 151
in Ajmer Disd under the g 88.2% me% PRI Memes 2.4% membHSC.
10.99%
PRI (n=779) (
ecific Mon
cesan social S
1139
9
stict initiated district. The mbers leavinbers, 5.4% Abers from MS
Figure
5.40%
17.4
ANM n=384)
AW(n=12
itoring Re
Service Socie
in the monthNGO comple
ng 11.8% untANM’s, 17.4%SS,17.4% me
3:Category wise
40%
11.20%
WW 226)
AS (n=790)
Category of Pa
N=705
SIHFWport: Some
ety (RCDSSS
h of May, 20eted 151 battrained. The
% AWW,11.2%mbers from S
e divison of par
2.40% 2
NGO (n=168) (n
articipant
3
W: an ISO:9001:e observat
)
010 simultanetches achieveparticipants
% Asha SahySHG and rest
ticipants
2.40%
17.40
MSS n=169)
SHG(n=122
:2008certified ins
tions
eously in all eing 92.1% owho were tr
yogini’s 2.4% t 32.7% were
0%
32.70%
G 26)
Others (n=2311)
stitution
16
the 8 of the rained NGO other
Mfr
F
Maximum partom age group
emale’s partic
Percen
tage
of p
articpan
ts
ticipation (67.p <25 years a
cipation (73.8
F
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
gp
p
.4%) was recand 18.4% fro
Figure 4
8%) surmount
Figure 5: Distrib
1(n
Male (n=1
26.
Sex dis
corded from aom age group
4: Age distributio
ted male part
bution of particip
14(n=
67.40%(n=475
18.40%n=1295)
N=7053
854)
.30%
stribution of th
N=705
SIHFWage group of 2p >45 years
on of participan
ticipation of on
pants according
4.20%=1005)
%53)
3
Female(n=51
73.7
he participants
3
W: an ISO:9001:25-45 years,
nts
nly 26.3%
g to Sex
199)
70%
s
:2008certified ins
while only 14
<2
25
>4
stitution
17
4.2 %
25
5‐45
45
O
be
M
(2
st
OBC represen
eing the lowe
Most of the pa
20.9%), 7.8%
tandard .Apar
0
20
40
60
80
Percen
tage
of P
articipa
nts
ntation in train
est with 2.7%
articipants (40
who had stu
rt from these
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
ST
nings was 65
attendance.
Figure 6:
0.0%) were e
udied 12th sta
21.7% partici
Figure 7: Leve
(n=188)
2.70%
40.00%
9.60%
5.7% followed
Caste distributi
educated in th
andard while 9
ipants were il
el of Education o
SC (n=911)
12.90%
Caste Of Part
N=7053
21
%
%
7.80%
N=7053
SIHFWd by general
ion of participan
he range of 5
9.6% particip
literate.
of participants
OBC (n=4635
65.70%
ticipants
3
.70%
20.90%
W: an ISO:9001:(18.7 %), SC
nts
5-10th followed
pants fall in th
5) GENERA(n=1319
%
18.
:2008certified ins
C (12.9%) an
d by of 1-5th
he range of 1
AL 9)
70%
Illitrate(n=15
1‐5th(n=1477
5‐10th(n=282
11‐12th(n=67
>12th(n=551
stitution
18
nd ST
grade
1-12th
527)
7)
22)
76)
1)
DNTTTBTof83TS%
F
Nw
District: BanswNGO: VAAGD
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
Batches comphe NGO, VAAf Banswada d3.3% of the ehe total particahyogini’s, 0
% others.
emale Partici
Note: Data onwas not obtai
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
Percen
tage
Of P
articipa
nts
wara HARA locks: 8 o be trained: VHSC: 1473
pleted: 258 AGDHARA wdistrict .of the expected 1264cipants distrib.1% members
pation of 66.2
Figu
n bifurcation ned for the i
0%
0%
0%
0%
PRI (n=1124)
10.70%
1476 3
was delegatedtotal target ,
47 participantbution is : 10.7s form NGO,0
Figure
2% outsmarte
ure 9: Distributio
of participannitial month
)ANM
(n=488)A
(n=
%4.60%
1
66.20%
d with the res98.9 % was a
ts to be traine7% PRI Mem0.1% membe
e 8: Category w
ed male partic
on of participan
nts based ons from the N
AWW =1440)
AS (n=148
13.70%14.1
Category
N=10
33.80
%
N=10529
SIHFW
ponsibility of achieved. Th
ed leaving a bbers, 4.6% A
ers from MSS
ise divison of pa
cipation (33.8
nts based on Sex
n age group, NGO.
82)NGO (n=11)
10%
0.10%
Of Participant
529
0%
W: an ISO:9001:
organizing trae total partici
backlog of 20.ANMs,13.7% AS 0.2% SHG m
articipants
8%)
x category
caste and le
MSS (n=12)
SH(n=
0.10% 0.
ts
Male (nFemale
:2008certified ins
ainings at 8 bpants trained.1%. AWW, 14.1% members and
evel of educa
HG 24)
Others (n=5948)
.20%
56.50%
n=3556)e(n=6973)
stitution
19
blocks d were
Asha d 56.5
ation
)
%
DNTTTBTtha
AAM
District: Baran
NGO: Gramin
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
Batches Comhe training in
he end of Martotal of 90.8%
Actual numbeANM’s,12.5% Members and
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
Percen
tage
Of P
artiicipan
ts
n Vikas Trust
locks: 7
o be trained:
VHSC: 1052
pleted: 143
n Baran Distrirch, 2012,93.4% of the total
er of trained AWWs, 13.138.0% Others
PRI (n=628) (
9.30%
1126
2
ict began in t4% of the totainvited partic
participants 1% Asha Sas; with no me
Figure 10
ANM n=386)
AW(n=8
5.70%
12.
the month of al VHSC (112ipants (7451)
was 6767ahyogini’s, 10embers from M
0: Category wise
WW 849)
AS (n=884)
50%13.10
Category O
N=6
SIHFW
July, 2010 in26) were train) leaving 9.2 %
comprising o0.1 % membMSS .
e divison of part
NGO (n=681)
M
0%
10.10%
Of Participants
767
W: an ISO:9001:
n 2 blocks (Aed completin% backlog ag
of 9.3% PRbers from NG
ticipants
MSS (=0) SH(n=7
0.00%
11.4
:2008certified ins
Anta and Barag 143 batche
gainst the targ
I members, GO, 11.4 %
HG 769)
Others (n=2570
40%
38.00%
stitution
20
an).By es and get.
5.7% SHG
0)
%
Mw
Mm
40pa
Maximum Partwhile participa
More of Femamale’s attende
0.6% participarticipants fro
0.
10.
20.
30.
40.
50.
60.
70.
Percen
tage
atten
dance
ticipation wasnts form age
ale Participaned the training
Fig
ants belongeom ST .Only 1
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
<25 Ye
s noticed fromgroup <25 ye
Figure 1
nts marked thgs.
gure 12: Distrib
d to OBC cat12.8% particip
ears (n=1272)
18.80%
Ag
59.7%,
m the age grears and >45
11: Age distribu
heir presence
ution of particip
tegory followepants from Ge
25‐45 Ye(n=465
6
ge groups of P
N=6767
4
N=6767
SIHFWroup of 25-45years were 1
ution of particip
e with 59.7%
pants based on S
ed by 17.6% peneral catego
ears 54)
>45
8.80%
Participants
7
40.3%,
7
W: an ISO:9001:5 years with 8.8% and 12
ants
% attendance
Sex
participants frory were train
5 Years (n=840
12.40%
Males(n
Female
:2008certified ins
68.8% attend.4% respectiv
while only 4
rom SC and 2ed.
0)
n=2729)
s(n= 4038)
stitution
21
dance vely
40.3%
29.0%
44st1
4.6% of the ptandard, 10.41-12th grade,
0.
10.
20.
30.
40.
50.Pe
rcen
tage
Atten
dance
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
participants we% participantwhile only 8.0
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
ST (n
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
Illiter(n=53
8
Figure 13: C
ere educatedts who had pa0% of the par
Figure 1
n=1964) SC
29.00%
rate 39)
1‐5t(n=18
.00%
27
aste distributio
upto 5-10th gassed12th starticipants wer
14: Level of Edu
C (n=1192)
17.60%
Caste of the p
N=6767
th 881)
5‐10(n=30
7.80%
44
Level Of Ed
N=67
SIHFW
on of participant
grade followedndard and 9.2
re illiterate.
cation of partic
OBC (n=2746)
40.60%
participants
0th 019)
11‐12(n=62
4.60%
9.2
ducation
767
W: an ISO:9001:
ts
d by 27.8% e2% participan
ipants
General (n=865)
12.80
2th 22)
>12(n=70
20% 10.
:2008certified ins
ducated uptonts educated
0%
th 06)
.40%
stitution
22
o 1-5th upto
DNTTTBScopa10m
F
Nw
District: BarmNGO: Society
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
Batches ComURE compleovered (2311articipants in0.1% ANMs,
members and
emales active
Note: Data onwas obtained
0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.0
Percen
tage
Of P
artiicipan
ts
mer for Rural Upllocks: 8 o be trained: VHSC: 1633pleted: 186 ted 186 batc1).The actuavited (1036016.7% AWW31.1 % were
ely participate
n bifurcation from the mo
00%00%00%00%00%00%00%00%
PRI (n=903
11.50
0.00%
50.00%
100.00%
Percen
tage
of p
articpan
ts
iftment (SUR
2311 3
ches by the el number of ) .Out of the
W, 11.5% AS,other membe
Figure 15
ed with a high
Figure
of participanonth of Septe
3)ANM
(n=788) (n
0%10.10%
%
%
%
Male (n
E)
end of March members tr
e total of 782 3.2% NGO ers of VHSC.
5: Category wise
her attendanc
16: Sex distribu
nts based onember from t
AWW n=1308)
AS(n=89
16.70%11.5
Category
N=
n=2527)
32.30%
Sex of the pa
N=7822
SIHFW
2012 coverained were 22 participanmembers, 6.6
e divison of part
e of 67.7% th
ution of particip
n age group, the NGO.
S 96)
NGO (n=254)
50%
3.20%
y Of Participan
=7822
Female (n=52
67.7
rticipants
2
W: an ISO:9001:
ring 70.7% of75.5% of the
nts 11.5% we6% MSS me
ticipants
han the male
pants
caste and le
MSS (n=517)
S(n=
6.60%
9.
nts
295)
70%
:2008certified ins
f total VHSCe total numbere PRI memmbers, 9.3%
(32.3 %)
evel of educa
HG =726)
Others(n=2430
.30%
31.10
stitution
23
to be ber of mbers,
SHG
ation
s 0)
%
DNTTTBT
an
co
pa
le
T
13
m
District: Bhilw
NGO: Mewar S
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
Batches comphe training at
nother NGO
onducted till
articipants tra
eft untrained.
he total parti
3.0% Asha S
members. Only
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
Percen
tage
Of P
artiicipan
ts
wara Sewa Sansth
locks: 11
o be trained:
VHSC: 1574
pleted: 187
t Bhilwara sta
(RCDSSS)
March, 2012
ained were 7
cipants traine
Sahyogini’s,
y 0.1 MSS me
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
PRI (n=9.6)
10.90
an (MSS), RC
1794
4
arted towards
was barged
2 completing
79.5% of the
ed can be bi
4.7% memb
ember were r
Figure 17: C
ANM (n=537)
A(n=
0%
6.40%
CDSSS
the end of Au
in the mont
87.7% of th
invited partic
furcated into
ers from NG
registered.
Category wise d
AWW =1301)
AS (n=108
15.60% 13.
Category
N=8334
SIHFW
ugust, 2010.In
th of Decem
he VHSC to
cipants (1047
10.9% PRI’s
GO, 9.4 % S
ivison of partici
85)NGO
(n=389)
00%
4.70%
y Of Participan
4
W: an ISO:9001:
n view of slow
mber, 2010. 1
be trained
9).20.5 %par
s, 6.4% ANM
SHG’s, and 3
pants
MSS (n=8)
S(n=
0.10%
ts
:2008certified ins
w pace of train
187 batches
.Actual numb
rticipants wer
Ms, 15.6% AW
39.9% were
HG =783)
Others(n=3325
9.40%
39.90
stitution
24
nings,
were
ber of
re still
WW’s,
other
s 5)
0%
7be
67
48co
1.6% participelonging to <2
7.8% Female
8.9% of the Oompared to 1
0
20
40
60
80
Percen
tage
atten
dance
pnats belonge25 years of a
e participants
OBC attended2.2% SC and
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
<25 Y
ed to the agege while only
Figur
appeared for
Figure 19: Dist
d the training wd 11.6 % ST c
Years (n=1333)
16.00%
A
67.8%,
e group of 2y 12.4 % parti
re 18: Age distti
r the training a
ribution of part
while 27.3% Gcategory.
25‐45 Y(n=596
71
Age groups of
N=8334
3
,
N=8334
SIHFW5-45 years, fcipants were
bution of partic
as compared
icipants based o
General categ
ears 65)
>45
1.60%
f Participants
4
32.2%,
4
W: an ISO:9001:followed by 1in age group
cipants
to 32.2% ma
on Sex
gory participa
5 Years (n=1036
12.40%
Male
Fema
:2008certified ins
16.0% partici >45 years
le participant
ants appeared
6)
es(n=2685)
ales(n=5649)
stitution
25
ipants
s
d as
24ed8
4.5% of the pducation betw.6% participa
0
10
20
30
40
50Pe
rcen
tage
Atten
dance
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
participants weween 5-10th snts were edu
F
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
ST
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Illitera(n=119
14.
Figure 20: C
ere educatedstandard, 11.2cated upto 12
igure 21: Educa
(n=970) S
11.60%
ate 99)
1‐5th(n=204
40%
24.
Caste distributio
upto 1-5th gr2% participan2th standard.
tional level of p
SC (n=1013)
12.20%
Caste of the p
N=8334
h 41)
5‐10t(n=34
50%
41
Level Of Ed
N=83
SIHFW
on of participant
rade while a mnts were in 1114.4% partic
participants
OBC (n=4078)
48.90%
participants
4
th 38)
11‐12(n=93
1.30%
11
ducation
334
W: an ISO:9001:
ts
maximum of 4-12th standaripants were il
) General(n=2273
27.3
2th 36)
>12(n=7
1.20%8.
:2008certified ins
41.3% had therd category anllitrate.
l )
0%
2th 20)
.60%
stitution
26
eir nd
DNTTTBIn
20
topa
1
2
65be
District: Bikan
NGO: Maru Vi
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
Batches Comn Bikaner, the
010.The total
otal VHSC toarticipants (69
1.1% PRI’s, 8
.9% members
5.1 % particielonging to ag
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
Percen
tage
Of P
artiicipan
ts
ner kas Evam Sh
locks: 5
o be trained:
VHSC: 881 pleted: 134 e training was
l number of b
o be trained (903).
8.0% ANMs,
s from MSS, 8
pnats belongge group >45
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
PRI (n=692)
11.10%
hod Sansthan
881
s started sim
batches comp
(881). Actual
11.4% AWW
8.6 % SHG’s
Figure 22
ged to the ag5 years while
ANM (n=502)
AW(n=7
%8.00%
1
multaneously i
leted till Marc
numbers of p
W’s, 11.8% As
, and 43.6% o
2: Category wise
ge group of 2only 16.0% p
WW 711)
AS (n=736)
1.40% 11.80
Category Of
N=6249
SIHFW
n 2 blocks n
ch, 2012 was
participants tr
sha Sahyogin
other membe
e divison of part
25-45 years, articipants we
NGO (n=169)
M(n=
%
2.70%
f Participants
W: an ISO:9001:
amely Nokha
134 complerained were 9
ni’s, 2.7% me
rs were traine
icipants
followed by 1ere in age <2
MSS =179)
SHG (n=536
2.90%
8.60
:2008certified ins
a, Kolayat in
eting 100 % o0.5% of the in
embers from
ed , respectiv
18.9% partici5 years
6)Others (n=2724)
0%
43.60%
stitution
27
June,
of the nvited
NGO,
vely.
ipants
Fpa
Mtr
emales got articipation
Maximum of trainings while
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0Pe
rcen
tage
atten
dance
the upper h
ainees were fthe participa
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
<25 Ye
Figure
hand with 68
Figure 24: Se
from OBC (50tion of SC an
ears (n=998)
16.00%
A
68.5%
23: Age distribu
8.5% particip
ex distribution o
0.8%). 22.2%d ST was lim
25‐45 Y(n=40
6
Age groups of
N=6249
31.
%,
N=6249
SIHFW
ution of particip
pation as co
of participants
% General cateited to 26.6%
Years 67)
>4
5.10%
Participants
5%,
W: an ISO:9001:
ants
ompared to
egory particip% and 0.4 % re
45 Years (n=11
18.90%
Male
Fema
:2008certified ins
only 31.5%
pants attendedespectively.
184)
%
es(n=1970)
ales(n=4279)
stitution
28
male
d the
3410th
4.1% of the p0th standard,
heir education
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0Pe
rcen
tage
Atten
dance
0.
10.
20.
30.
40.
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
participants we 7.0% particip
n completed u
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
ST (n
0
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
Illite(n=8
13
Figure 25: C
ere educatedpants were edupto 12th stan
Figure 26:
=26) SC
0.40%
C
rate 850)
1‐5(n=21
3.60%
34
Caste distributio
till 5th grade ducated upto dard.13.6% p
Level of Educat
(n=1662) O
26.60%
Caste of the pa
N=62
th 134)
5‐10(n=24
4.10%
3
Level Of Ed
N=6249
SIHFW
on of participant
while 38.5% 11-12th stan
participnats w
ion of participan
OBC (n=3173)
50.80%
articipants
249
0th 404)
11‐12(n=43
38.50%
7.
ducation
9
W: an ISO:9001:
ts
had their edudard and 6.8%
were illetrate.
nts
General (n=1388)
22.2
2th 38)
>12t(n=42
.00% 6
:2008certified ins
ucation betwe% participant
)
0%
th 23)
.80%
stitution
29
en 5- s had
DNTTTBR
co
th
D
S
.
District: Bund
NGO: Rajastha
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
Batches ComRVHA started
ompleted till M
he invited part
Distribution of
ahyogini’s, 0.
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
Percen
tage
Of P
artiicipan
ts
i an Voluntary
locks: 4
o be trained:
VHSC: 883
pleted: 129 the VHSC fie
March, 2012 w
ticipants (618
f trained part
.1% NGO, 0.3
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
PRI (n=716)
12.40%
Health Assoc
885
eld level train
were 129 (99
81).
ticipants is 1
3% MSS, 1.1
Figure 27: Cat
ANM (n=264)
AW(n=7
%
4.60%
12
ciation (RVHA
ings in Bund
9.8%). Actual
2.4% PRI’s,
% SHG’s, an
tegory wise divis
WW 734)
AS (n=660)
2.70% 11.50
Category Of
N=5760
SIHFW
A)
i in June, 201
number of pa
4.6% ANMs
nd 57.3% othe
son of participa
NGO (n=7)
M(n
%
0.10%
f Participants
W: an ISO:9001:
10 .The total
articipants tra
s, 12.7% AW
er members.
nts
MSS n=19)
SHG (n=62
0.30% 1.10
:2008certified ins
number of V
ined was 93.2
WW’s, 11.5%
)Others (n=3298)
0%
57.30%
stitution
30
HSCs
2% of
Asha
65fr
6
5.2 % participom age group
1.0% Female
0
20
40
60
80
Percen
tage
atten
dance
pants belongep >45 years w
e participants
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
<25 Y
ed to the agewhile only 10.
Figure
attended the
Figure 29: Sex
Years (n=616)
10.70%
A
61.0%,
e group 25-457% participan
28: Age distribu
training as co
x distribution of
25‐45 Y(n=460
79
Age groups of P
N=576
39
N=5760
SIHFW5 years, follownts who belon
ution of particip
ompared to o
f participants
ears 03)
>4
9.90%
Participants
0
9.0%,
W: an ISO:9001:wed by 9.4 %nged to <25 y
pants
nly 39.0% ma
5 Years (n=541
9.40%
Male
Fema
:2008certified ins
% participantsyears age gro
ale participan
1)
es(n=2244)
ales(n=3516)
stitution
31
were up
ts
39ca
E(8
9.2% of the Oategory, 14.0
Educational le8.8%) particip
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
OBC participa% SC and 24
evel of traineepants; passed
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
ST (n=
2
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
Illiter(n=14
24
ant’s were trai4.8 % ST.
Figure 3
es was 1-5th g 12th standard
Figure
=1427) SC
24.80%
ate 405)
1‐5t(n=11
4.40%20
ned till March
30: Caste distribu
grade (20.7%)d (7.4%). 24.4
31: Level of Edu
C (n=806)
14.00%
Caste of the p
N=5760
th 194)
5‐10(n=22
0.70%
38
Level of Ed
N=576
SIHFWh, 2011, 22.0%
ution of particip
) 5-10th stand4% participna
ucation of partic
OBC (n=2257
39.20
participants
0th 223)
11‐12(n=50
8.60%
8
ducation
0
W: an ISO:9001:% belonged to
pants
dard (38.6%),ats were illetra
cipants
7) Gener(n=127
%
22
2th 09)
>12(n=4
8.80% 7
:2008certified ins
o General
, 11-12th stanate.
ral 70)
2.00%
th 29)
7.40%
stitution
32
ndard
DNTTTBV
ag
of
T
fr
66wag
District: Churu
NGO: Borukha
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
Batches compVHSC training
gainst the set
f participants
here were 10
om NGO, 0.4
6.9 % particiwere in the ag
ge.
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
Percen
tage
Of P
artiicipan
ts
u a Charitable T
locks: 6
o be trained:
VHSC: 881 pleted: 125
gs were initiat
t target of 88
trained were
0.1% PRI’s, 1
4% members
pants belongge group >45
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
PRI (n=510)
10.10%
Trust
888
ted in churu d
8 (99.2%) at
84.2% of the
0.1% ANMs,
from MSS, 8.
Figure 3
ed to the ag5 years while
ANM (n=511)
AW(n=8
% 10.10%
17
district in Jun
6 blocks of c
e invited partic
17.7% AWW
.4 % SHG’s, a
32: Category wis
e group of 25only 14.8 %
WW 899)
AS (n=913)
7.70%18.00%
Category Of
N=5
SIHFW
ne, 2010. In t
churu coverin
cipants (5074
W’s, 18.0% As
and 35.0% ot
se divison of par
5-45 years, f% participnats
NGO (n=24)
M(n
%
0.50%
f Participants
5074
W: an ISO:9001:
total, 881 VH
g 125 batche
4).
sha Sahyogin
ther members
rticipants
followed by 1who belonge
MSS n=18)
SHG (n=424
0.40%
8.40
:2008certified ins
HSC’s were tr
es. Actual num
i’s, 0.5% mem
s.
8.2 % particied to <25 yea
4)Others (n=1775)
0%
35.00%
stitution
33
rained
mbers
mbers
ipants ars of
76
54paS
6.7% Female
4.4% of the Oarticipants attC and ST cat
0
20
40
60
80Pe
rcen
tage
atten
dance
es participants
OBC participatended the trategories, resp
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
<25 Y
Figure 3
s were trained
Figure 34:
ant’s attendedainings as compectively.
Years (n=753)
14.80%
Ag
76
33: Age distribut
d as compare
: Sex distributio
the training smpared to 1.1
25‐45 Ye(n=339
66
ge groups of P
N=507
2
6.8%,
N=5074
SIHFW
tion of participa
ed to only 23.3
n of particpants
sessions whil1% and 21.5
ears 6)
>45 Y
6.90%
Participants
74
23.2%,
W: an ISO:9001:
nts
3% males’ pa
s
e 23.0% Gen% participant
Years (n=921)
18.20%
Male
Fema
:2008certified ins
articipants
neral categoryts who belong
es(n=1182)
ales(n=3892)
stitution
34
y ged to
N
Note: Data on
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0Pe
rcen
tage
Atten
dance
n education l
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
ST (n
Figure 35: C
evel of partic
n=58) SC
1.10%
C
Caste distributio
cipants was
(n=1091) O
21.50%
Caste of the pa
N=5
SIHFW
on of participant
not obtained
OBC (n=2758)
54.40%
articipants
074
W: an ISO:9001:
ts
d from the st
General (n=1167)
23.00
:2008certified ins
tart from the
0%
stitution
35
NGO
DNTTTBIn
V
pa
T
A
4
District: Daus
NGO: Mata Sh
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
Batches compn Dausa distr
VHSC’s to be
articipants.
he total partic
Asha Sahyogi
1.1% were ot
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
Percen
tage
Of P
artiicipan
ts
a hree Gomati D
locks: 5
o be trained:
VHSC: 769 pleted: 110 ict VHSC trai
e trained till
cipants traine
ni’s, 3.1% m
ther members
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
PRI (n=638)
13.70%
Devi (MSGD)
1113
inings are be
March 2012
d can be divid
members from
s.
Figure 36:
ANM (n=219)
AW(n=6
%
4.70%
13
ing undertake
2. 86.7% par
ded into 13.7
m NGO, 1.0%
: Category wise
WW 619)
AS (n=709)
3.30% 15.20%
Category Of
N=4665
SIHFW
en in 5 blocks
rticipants wer
% PRI’s, 4.7%
% members f
divison of partic
NGO (n=143)
M(n
%
3.10%
f Participants
5
W: an ISO:9001:
s completing
re trained ou
% ANMs, 13.3
from MSS, 7
cipants
MSS n=48)
SHG (n=370
1.00%
7.90
:2008certified ins
72.3% of the
ut of 5383 in
3% AWW’s, 1
7.9 % SHG’s
0)Others (n=1919)
0%
41.10%
stitution
36
e total
nvited
15.2%
s, and
7fr
94
1.9 % particiom age group
4.0% Female
Percen
tage
atten
dance
pants belongp >45 years w
es participants
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
<25
ed to the agwhile only 16.
Figure
s as compare
Figure 38: S
5 Years (n=789
16.90%
A
64.0%,
e group of 259% participan
e 37: Age distrib
ed to only 36.0
Sex distribution
9) 25‐45 Y(n=33
7
Age groups of
N=4665
N=4665
SIHFW5-45 years, fnts who belon
bution of particip
0% males app
of participants
Years 352)
>45
1.90%
Participants
5
36.0%,
W: an ISO:9001:followed by 1nged to <25 y
pants
peared for the
5 Years (n=524
11.20%
Male
Fema
:2008certified ins
1.2 % particiyears of age g
e training.
4)
es(n=1679)
ales(n=2986)
stitution
37
ipants group.
Cpa
20uppa
Category specarticipants be
0.1% of the ppto 5-10th staassed 12th sta
0
10
20
30
40
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
cific distributioelonged to gen
participants weandard, 9.9% andard.Only 6
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
ST (
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
Illiter(n=31
6
on of participaneral categor
Figure
ere educatedparticipants s
6.9% participn
Figure 4
(n=1428)
30.60%
ate 15)
1‐5t(n=93
.80%20.
ants was 26.9ry.
e 39: Caste distr
upto 1-5th grstudied till 11nats were ille
40: Level of Educ
SC (n=775)
16.60%
Caste of the
N=46
h 37)
5‐10t(n=235
.10%
50.
Level Of Ed
N=4665
SIHFW9 % OBC 30.6
ibution of partic
rade another 5-12th standar
etrate.
cation of partici
OBC (n=1257
26.90%
participants
665
th 59)
11‐12t(n=461
60%
9.90
ucation
5
W: an ISO:9001:6 % ST, 16.6%
cipants
50.6% had thrd and 12.7%
pants
7) Genera(n=120
% 25
th 1)
>12th(n=593
0% 12.7
:2008certified ins
% SC and 25.
eir education% participants
al 5)
5.80%
h 3)
70%
stitution
38
.8 %
n
DNTTTBL
tr
83
O
S
ot
District: Dholp
NGO: LUPIN
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
Batches compUPIN was as
ained till Mar
3.8% membe
O the total tr
ahyogini’s, 0
ther members
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
Percen
tage
Of P
artiicipan
ts
pur
locks: 4
o be trained:
VHSC: 562 pleted: 90 ssigned VHS
rch 2012 is 7
ers out of the 4
rained,14.6%
0.8% member
s.
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
PRI (n=551)
14.60%
799
SC field level
70.3%.out of
4495 participa
were PRI
rs from NGO
Figure 41:
ANM (n=286)
AW(n=5
7.60%
13
training at 4
targeted 799
ants invited.
members, 7
O, 1.4% mem
: Category wise
WW 519)
AS (n=572)
3.80%15.20%
Category Of
N=376
SIHFW
4 Blocks of D
9. Total 90 ba
.6% ANMs,
mbers from M
divison of partic
NGO (n=32)
M(n
%
0.80%
f Participants
68
W: an ISO:9001:
Dholpur distr
atches were
13.8% AWW
MSS, 1.5 % S
cipants
MSS n=54)
SHG (n=57
1.40% 1.50
:2008certified ins
ricts. Total VH
conducted to
W’s, 15.2% A
SHG’s, and 4
7)Others (n=1697)
0%
45.00%
stitution
39
HSCs
o train
ASHA
45.0%
67ye
M
7.8 % participears while on
Male: Female
Percen
tage
atten
dance
pnats belongely 17.4 % par
ratio of partic
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
<2
ed to the age rticipants who
Figure
cipants was 3
Figure 43: Sex
25 Years (n=65
17.40%
62.8%
group 25-45 o belonged to
e 42: Age distrib
37.2%: 62.8%
x category distir
56) 25‐45(n=2
6
Age groups o
N=3
N=3768
SIHFWyears, 14.8 % <25 years ag
bution of partici
%
rbution of partic
Years 253)
>4
67.80%
of Participants
768
37.2%
W: an ISO:9001:% participantsge group
ipants
cipants
45 Years (n=55
14.80%
Male
Fema
:2008certified ins
s in age grou
9)
es(n=1401)
ales(n=2367)
stitution
40
p >45
32tr
Dst
2.0% of the Oaining
Distribution of tandard: 41.1
0.
10.
20.
30.
40.
50.
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
OBC, 7.7 % S
Participants a%, 11-12th st
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
ST (n
Illiterate (n=346)
9.20%
T, 17.9% SC
Figure
according to etandard: 13.5
Figure 45: Le
n=292) S
7.70%
1‐5th (n=882)
23.40%
L
and 42.4 % g
44: Caste distri
educational le5%, 12th stand
evel of Educatio
SC (n=673)
17.90%
Caste of the
N=37
5‐10th (n=1549)
%
41.10%
Level Of Educat
N=3768
SIHFWgeneral categ
bution of partic
evel was, 1-5t
dard: 12.8%, I
on of participant
OBC (n=1206
32.05%
participants
768
11‐12th (n=508)
%
13.50%
tion
W: an ISO:9001:gory participa
cipants
th grade: 23.4Ililterate: 9.2%
ts
6) Gener(n=159
%
42
>12th (n=483)
% 12.80
:2008certified ins
nts attended
4%, 5-10th %
ral 97)
2.40%
%
stitution
41
the
DNTTTBT
ta
T
A
17
District: Dung
NGO: BCT
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
Batches comphe total VHS
arget of 900. 8
he total partic
Asha Sahyogi
7.9% were ot
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
16.00%
18.00%
20.00%
Percen
tage
Of P
artiicipan
ts
garpur
locks: 5
o be trained:
VHSC: 859 pleted: 126 Cs trained in
87.4 % of the
cipants traine
ni’s, 0.1% m
ther members
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
PRI (n=909)
16.40%
900
n dungarpur d
invited partic
ed are divided
members from
s.
Figure 46: Cat
ANM (n=656)
AW(n=
%
11.80%
1
district till Mar
cipants (6354
d into 16.4%
m NGO, 0.2%
tegory wise divis
WW 1053)
AS (n=101
19.00%18.3
Category
N=
SIHFW
rch 2012, are
) were trained
PRI’s, 11.8%
% members fr
son of participa
18)NGO (n=8)
30%
0.10%
Of Participant
=5553
W: an ISO:9001:
e 95.4% agai
d in 126 batch
% ANMs, 19.0
rom MSS, 16
nts
MSS (n=9)
S(n=
0.20%
1
ts
:2008certified ins
nst the const
hes.
0% AWW’s, 1
6.3 % SHG’s
HG =906)
Others(n=994
6.30%17.90
stitution
42
tituted
18.3%
s, and
s 4)
0%
72w
80pa
2.6 % particiwere in age gr
0.2% Femalarticipants
0.
20.
40.
60.
80.
Percen
tage
atten
dance
pnats belongoup >45 year
e participant
F
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
<25 Y
ed to the agrs while only 1
Figure 4
ts appeared
Figure 48: Sex di
Years (n=862)
15.50%
Ag
80.2%
e group of 2515.5% particip
47: Age distribut
for the tra
istribution of pa
25‐45 Ye(n=403
72
ge groups of P
N=55
19.8%
N=5553
SIHFW5-45 years, fpnats belong
tion of participa
aining as co
articipants
ears 33)
>45
.60%
Participants
553
W: an ISO:9001:followed by 1ining to <25 y
ants
mpared to o
5 Years (n=658
11.80%
Males(n=1
Females(n
:2008certified ins
1.8 % particiyears age gro
only 19.8%
8)
1101)
n=4452)
stitution
43
ipants oup
male
10ban
Th
0.9% of the Oelonged to Snd general ca
he education
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
OBC participaST category aategories, res
al level of the
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
ST (n
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
Illitera(n=18
3.
ant’s attendedas compared
spectively.
Figure 49: C
e participants
Figure 50
=3828) S
68.90%
ate 86)
1‐5th(n=133
30%
24.
the training sto 6.1% and
Caste distributio
s is depicted i
0: Level of Educa
SC (n=337)
6.10%
Caste of the
N=5553
h 38)
5‐10t(n=266
10%
48.
Level Of Edu
N=555
SIHFWsessions whil14.1 % partic
on of participant
n the followi
ation of participa
OBC (n=605
10.90%
participants
3
h 68)
11‐12t(n=848
00%
15.
ucation
53
W: an ISO:9001:e 68.9 % parcipants who b
ts
ng bar diagra
ants
5) Gene(n=78
%14
th 8)
>12th(n=513
30% 9.2
:2008certified ins
rticipants belonged to S
am
ral 83)
4.10%
h 3)
20%
stitution
44
C
DNTTTNT
V
T
A
m
District: Gang
NGO: Maharis
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No. of batchehe training a
VHSC’s to be t
he total of Ac
AWW, 8.8% A
members and
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
Percen
tage
Of P
articipa
nts
ganagar shi Dayanana
locks: 7
o be trained:
VHSC: 2678
s completedt Ganganaga
trained .The t
ctual participa
Asha Sahyogi
55.6% others
PRI (n=1236)
A(n=
10.50%
d Vikas Sami
2733
8
d: 258
ar district star
total of 98.0 %
ants (11814) c
ni’s, 1.6% me
s.
Figure 51
ANM =473)
AWW(n=114
4.09%
9.7
iti (MDVS)
rted as early
% VHSC were
can be split in
embers form
1: Category wise
W 48)
AS (n=1043)
70%8.80%
Category O
N=1
SIHFW
as May, 201
e trained till M
nto 10.5% PR
NGO, 1.2% m
e divison of part
NGO (n=190) (
%
1.60%
f Participants
1814
W: an ISO:9001:
0 owing to it
March 2012 .
RI Members,
members from
ticipants
MSS (n=142)
SH(n=1
1.20%
8
:2008certified ins
ts large numb
4.0% ANMs,
m MSS 8.6%
HG 1018)
Other(n=656
8.60%
55.6
stitution
45
ber of
9.7%
SHG
rs 64)
60%
Tbe
F
he age distribelonged to ag
emale particip
0.
20.
40.
60.
80.
Percen
tage
atten
dance
bution of the pge group of 25
pation was m
Fig
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
<25 Ye
61
participants is5-45 years.
Figure 5
much higher (6
gure 53: Sex dist
ears (n=1881)
15.90%
Ag
1.0%
s reflected in t
52: Age distribut
61.0%) compa
tribution of par
25‐45 Ye(n=776
65
ge groups of P
N=1181
39
N=11814
SIHFWthe bar diagra
tion of participa
ared to 39.0%
rticipants
ears 63)
>45
.70%
Participants
14
9.0%
W: an ISO:9001:am below whe
ants
% male partici
Years (n=2170
18.40%
Males
Fema
:2008certified ins
ere 65.7 %
pants
0)
s(n=4608)
les(n=7206)
stitution
46
Wpa
M5t
cl
With 49.5% of articipants be
Maximum (41.th grade and aleared 12th st
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
OBC participelonged to gen
2%) had theiranother 9.8%tandard.13.8%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
ST (n
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
Illitera(n=163
13
pants, ST acconeral categor
Figure
r education u with educatio% participnats
Figure 55: L
n=27) SC
0.20%
ate 34)
1‐5th(n=320
.80%
27.1
ounted for onry.
54: Caste distri
pto 5-10th ston upto 11-12s were illetrat
Level of Educatio
C (n=4726)
40.00%
Caste of the
N=11814
h 03)
5‐10t(n=486
10%
41.2
Level Of Edu
N=1181
SIHFWnly 0.2 %, SC
bution of partic
tandard follow2th standard ate.
on of participan
OBC (n=5850
49.50%
participants
4
h 68)
11‐12t(n=116
20%
9.8
ucation
14
W: an ISO:9001:for 40.0% an
cipants
wed by 27.1%and 8.0% par
nts
0) Gene(n=12
%
10
th 60)
>12th(n=949
80% 8.0
:2008certified ins
nd 10.3 %
% in the rangerticipants who
eral 211)
0.30%
h 9)
0%
stitution
47
e of 1-o
DNTTTN
U
to
12
4
District: Hanu
NGO: URMUL
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batches
URMUL at han
otal of 93.1 %
2.1% PRI’s,
.2% members
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
Percen
tage
Of P
artiicipan
ts
umangarh L
locks: 3
o be trained:
VHSC: 1775
s completed:
numangrah s
of the invited
5.3% ANMs,
s from MSS, 8
PRI (n=874) (n
12.20%
1775
5 : 157
uccessfully c
d participants
, 9.1% AWW
8.3 % SHG’s
Figure 56: C
ANM n=382)
AW(n=6
5.40%
9
ompleted 100
(7896) were
W’s, 8.9% Ash
, and 42.7% o
Category wise di
WW 661)
AS (n=646
9.30% 9.0
Category
N
SIHFW
0 % of the tar
trained in 157
ha Sahyogini
other membe
vison of particip
6)NGO
(n=671)
00%9.40%
y Of Participan
N=7140
W: an ISO:9001:
rgeted 1775 b
7 batches.
i’s, 9.4% me
rs, were train
pants
MSS (=290)
%
4.10%
nts
:2008certified ins
by March 201
mbers from
ned .
SHG (n=590)
O(n=
8.30%
stitution
48
12. A
NGO,
Others =3026)
42.40%
60fr
57pa
0.7 % participom <25 years
7.4% Femalarticipants
0
20
40
60
80
Percen
tage
atten
dance
pnats belonges age group w
e participant
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
<25 Y
ed to the age while only 16.
Figure
ts appeared
Figure 58: S
Years (n=1677)
22.80%
A
57.
group 25-455% participna
57: Age distribu
for the tra
Sex distribution
25‐45 Y(n=44
6
Age groups of
N=735
.4%
N=7350
SIHFW years, followats who belon
ution of particip
aining as co
n of participants
Years 460)
>4
0.70%
f Participants
50
42.6%
0
W: an ISO:9001:wed by 22.8 %nged to >45 y
ants
mpared to o
45 Years (n=12
16.50%
Male
Fema
:2008certified ins
% participantsyears age gro
only 42.6%
13)
%
es(n=3132)
ales(n=4218)
stitution
49
s were up
male
57tow
4ex
7.6% of the Oo ST categorywho belonged
1.9% of the pxpressed as t
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
OBC participay participants to SC and ge
participants wthe bar diagra
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
ST (
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
Illite(n=9
1
ants attended attended the
eneral catego
Figure
ith schooling am below:
Figure 6
(n=13) S
0.20%
rate 972)
1(n=
13.20%
the training strainings as c
ories.
59: Caste distri
upto 5-10th s
60: Level of Educ
SC (n=2315)
31.50%
Caste of the
N=735
1‐5th =1539) (
20.90%
Level
N=
SIHFWsessions whilecompared to
bution of partic
standard, the
cation of partici
OBC (n=423
57.60%
participants
50
5‐10th n=3076)
41.90%
Of Education
=7350
W: an ISO:9001:e 0.2 % partic31.5% and 10
cipants
educational l
pants
5) General (
%
10
11‐12th (n=908)
12.40%
:2008certified ins
cipants belong0.7% particip
evels of other
(n=787)
0.70%
>12th (n=855
11.60%
stitution
50
ged ants
rs are
)
%
DNTTTN
Ja2co
9
0
N
District: Jaipu
NGO: VISHAK
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batches
aipur being a 161 VHSCs tovering 12063
.3% PRI’s, 5
.3% member
NGO.
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
50.00%
Percen
tage
Of P
artiicipan
ts
ur KHA
locks: 13
o be trained:
VHSC: 1947s completed:
big district is o be trained o3 (79.7%) par
.3% ANMs, 1
s from MSS,
PRI (n=1126)
9.30%
2177
7 : 286
divided into tof which only rticipants in 2
18.6% AWW’
3.9 % SHG’
Figure 61
ANM (n=642)
A(n=
5.30%
1
two i.e. Jaipu 1947 ( 89.6%
286 batches.
’s, 15.0% As
s, and 47.0%
1: Category wise
WW =2247)
AS(n=18
18.60%15
Categor
N=1
SIHFW
r I and II, hav% ) has been
sha Sahyogin
% were other
divison of parti
09)
NGO (n=66)
5.00%
0.50%
y Of Participan
2063
W: an ISO:9001:
ving a total of accomplishe
i’s, 0.5% me
members, th
icipants
MSS (=31)
% 0.30%
nts
:2008certified ins
13 blocks wited till March,
embers from
at were train
SHG (n=472)
O(n=
3.90%
stitution
51
th 2012
NGO,
ed by
Others =5670)
47.00%
Tye
F
he age distriears of age (1
emale particip
Percen
tage
atten
dance
bution of par14.3%).
pants (77.6%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
<2
rticipants is 2
Figure 62:
%) clearly outn
Figure 63: Se
5 Years (n=159
13.20%
77.6%
5-45 years (7
Age distributio
numbered the
ex distribution o
94) 25‐4(n=
%
Age groups
N=1
2
N=12063
SIHFW72.4 %) <25
n of participant
male particip
of participants
45 Years =8739)
72.40%
of Participant
2063
2.4%
3
W: an ISO:9001:years age g
s
pants (22.4%)
>45 Years (n=
14.
ts
Male
Fema
:2008certified ins
roup (13.2%)
)
=1730)
30%
es(n=2707)
ales(n=9356)
stitution
52
), >45
Cge
22papa
Class specific eneral catego
2.3% of the articipants uparticipnats we
0.
5.
10.
15.
20.
25.
30.
35.
40.
45.
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
distribution shory.
participants pto11-12th stere illetrate.
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
ST (
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Illitera(n=135
11
hows 41.6% O
Figure
had schoolitandard and
Figure 65: Le
(n=1351)
11.20%
ate 58)
1‐5t(n=269
.30%
22.
OBC, 11.2 %
64: Caste distri
ng upto pri11.8% partic
evel of Educatio
SC (n=2177)
18.00%
Caste of t
N
h 93)
5‐10(n=55
30%
46
Level Of Ed
N=12
SIHFW ST, 18.0% S
bution of partic
imary level,cipants compl
on of participant
OBC (n=
%
4
the participan
N=12063
th 81)
11‐12(n=10
6.30%
8.
ducation
2063
W: an ISO:9001:SC and 29.2%
cipants
46.3%, upto leted their 12
ts
=5018) Gen
41.60%
nts
2th 007)
>12(n=14
30%11
:2008certified ins
% participants
secondary, 2th standard.1
eral (n=3517)
29.20%
2th 424)
1.80%
stitution
53
from
8.3% 11.3%
DNTTTNT
co
O
S
District: Tonk NGO: CECOE
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batcheshe training at
onducted till M
Of the total t
ahyogini’s, 3.
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
EDECON
locks: 6
o be trained:
VHSC: 1074s completed:t Tonk started
March 2012. 8
rained 12.9%
.3 % NGO’s,
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
PRI (n=779)
12.90%
1080
4 : 151 d in the first w
80.7% partici
% were PRI
1.5% MSS’s
Figure 6
ANM (n=358) (
%
5.90%
week of mont
pants were tr
members, 5
13.5% SHG’s
66: Category wis
AWW (n=815)
A(n=
13.40%
1
Catego
N=6
SIHFW
th of June, 20
rained of the i
5.9% ANMs,
s and 38.7% w
se divison of par
AS 660)
NGO(n=199
10.90%
3.30
ory of Particip
6062
W: an ISO:9001:
010. 151 batc
nvited 7512 p
13.4% AWW
were other m
rticipants
O 9)
MSS (n=89)
0%1.50%
ants
:2008certified ins
ches (99.4%)
participants.
W’s, 10.9% A
embers.
SHG (n=816)
O(n
13.50%
stitution
54
) were
ASHA
Others n=2346)
38.70%
70ag
63pa
0.5 % participge group whil
3.6% Femalearticipants
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pnats belongele only 12.3 %
es participan
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
<25
ed to the age % participants
Figure
nts appeared
Figure 68: S
5 (n=1044)
17.20%
A
63.6%
N
group 25-45 s were from a
e 67: Age distrib
d for the tra
Sex distribution
25‐45 (n=
7
Age group of P
N=60
36
N=6062
SIHFWyears, 17.2%ge group >45
bution of particip
aining as co
n of participants
=4274)
70.50%
Participants
062
6.4%
W: an ISO:9001:% participnats5 years.
pants
ompared to
>45 (n=747)
12.30%
M
Fe
:2008certified ins
were in <25
only 36.4%
%
ale (n=2209)
emale (n=3853
stitution
55
years
male
)
48pato
64an
8.1% of the articipants att
o SC and ST c
.5% participa1.4% who wend 13.0% par
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
Percen
tage
atten
dance
0.
10.
20.
30.
40.
50.
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
OBC participtended the tracategories, re
ants were illitere educated rticipants pas
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
ST (n
1
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
Illiter(n=3
6
pants attendeainings as coespectively.
Figure 69: C
terate. 29.1% upto 5-10th ssed 12th stan
Figure 70: Le
n=862)
14.20%
rate 95)
1‐5(n=17
6.50%
29
ed the traininompared to 14
Caste distributio
% of the partstandard, 10.dard.
evel of Educatio
SC (n=865)
14.30%
Caste of P
N=6
th 762)
5‐10(n=25
9.10%
4
Level of Ed
N=60
SIHFWng sessions w4.3% and 14.
on of participant
icipants were.0% participa
on of participant
OBC (n=29
48.1
Participants
062
0th 509)
11‐1(n=6
1.40%
1
ducation
062
W: an ISO:9001:while 23.4% .2 % participa
ts
e educated unts studied ti
ts
08) Gen (
10%
12th 608)
>12(n=7
10.00%13
:2008certified ins
General catants who belo
upto primary ill 11-12th sta
n=1407)
23.40%
2th 788)
3.00%
stitution
56
tegory onged
level, ndard
DNTTTNT
a
pa
in
T
S
District: Sawa
NGO: CECOE
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batcheshe training at
total of 100
articipants tra
nvited particip
he distributio
ahyogini’s, 0.
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
Percen
tage
of P
articipa
nts
ai Madhopur EDECON
locks: 5
o be trained:
VHSC: 727 s completed:t Sawai Madh
0 batches we
ained was 92.
pants is still le
on of particip
.5% NGO’s, 0
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
PRI (n=531)
11.30%
754
: 100 hopur started
ere conducte
.0% of the inv
ft untrained.
pants is 11.
0.5% MSS’s,
Figure 71
ANM (n=322) (
%
6.90%
in the first w
ed completing
vited participa
3% PRI’s, 6
17.7% SHG’s
1: Category wise
AWW n=654)
A(n=5
14.00%1
Catego
N
SIHFW
week of month
g 96.4% of t
ants (5089). A
6.9% ANMs,
s and 37.2% w
e divison of part
AS 559)
NGO (n=24
11.90%
0.5
ory of Participa
N=4684
W: an ISO:9001:
h of July, 201
the training.
A backlog of 4
14.0% AWW
were other m
ticipants
)MSS (n=23)
0% 0.50%
ants
:2008certified ins
0. By March,
Actual numb
405 (8% of the
W’s, 11.9%
embers.
SHG (n=829)
O(n
17.70%
stitution
57
2012
ber of
e total
Asha
Others n=1742)
37.20%
79w
F
9.7 % participwho were <25
emale particip
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pnats belongeyears of age
pation (77.0%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
ed to the age. Only 8.8 %
Figure 72
%) was better
Figure 73
<25 (n=537)
11.50
7
e group 25-45participants w
2: Age distributio
compared to
3: Sex distributio
25‐4
0%
Age grou
N
7.5.%
N=4684
SIHFW5 years, followwere in age gr
on of participan
males (23.0%
on of participant
45 (n=3734)
79.70%
p of Participan
N=4684
22.5%
4
W: an ISO:9001:wed by 11.5%roup of >45 y
nts
%)
ts
>45 (n
nts
:2008certified ins
% participnatsyears
n=413)
8.80%
Male (n=1079
Female (n=36
stitution
58
s who
9)
605)
37fr
9atpa
7.6% of the Oom SC and 2
.6% participattended schoarticipants pa
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
Percen
tage
atten
dance
1
2
3
4
5
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
OBC participa20.9 % from S
nts were illiteool from 5-10assed 12th sta
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
ST (n=
2
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Illi(n
ants attended ST category.
Figure
erate. 30.8% oth standard. 7
andard.
Figure 7
=980) SC
20.90%
iterate n=450) (
9.60%
the training, 2
74: Caste distrib
of the particip7.8% particip
75: Level of Educ
C (n=833)
17.80%
Caste of Par
N=468
1‐5th n=1441)
30.80%
Leve
N
SIHFW23.7% were f
bution of partici
pants were edpants studied
cation of partici
OBC (n=1761
37.60%
rticipants
84
5‐10th (n=1994)
42.60%
el of Education
N=4684
W: an ISO:9001:from General
ipants
ducated upto till 11-12th s
pants
) Gen (n=1
%
23
11‐12th (n=367)
7.80%
n
:2008certified ins
category, 17
1-5th grade, 4standard and
110)
3.70%
>12th (n=432)
9.20%
stitution
59
.8%
42.6% 9.2%
DNTTTNS
co
pa
1
14
District: Siroh
NGO: Vaatsaly
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batchestarting in Jul
ompleted till
articipants (36
1.6% PRI’s,
4.4% SHG’s a
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
i ya
locks: 5
o be trained:
VHSC: 519 s completed:ly, 2010 with
March, 2012
677).
9.3% ANMs,
and 33.9% ot
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
PRI (n=404)
11.60%
526
: 74 h two blocks
2. Actual nu
14.9% AWW
ther members
Figure 7
ANM (n=323) (
%
9.30%
(Sheogang a
mber of part
W’s, 9.8% As
s, were traine
6: Category wis
AWW (n=518)
A(n=
14.90%
Catego
N=3
SIHFW
and Pindawa
ticipants train
sha Sahyogin
ed in 74 batch
e divison of par
AS 342)
NGO(n=6)
9.80%
0.20
ory of Particip
3488
W: an ISO:9001:
ara), 74 batc
ned was 94.
i’s, 0.2% NG
es.
rticipants
)
MSS (n=210)
0%
6.00%
ants
:2008certified ins
hes (98.7%)
9% of the in
GO’s, 6.0% M
SHG (n=504)
O(n
14.40%
stitution
60
were
nvited
MSS’s,
Others n=1181)
33.90%
68in
A
8.4 % participn age group o
Again the fem
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pnats belongeof <25 years.
male participat
Fig
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
<25
ed to the age
Figure 7
tion (70.4%) w
gure 78: Sex dis
5 (n=510)
14.60%
Ag
71.0%
N
e group 25-45
77: Age distribut
was more tha
stribution of par
25‐45 (n=2
68.
ge group of Pa
N=34
29.0
N=3488
SIHFW5 years and a
tion of participa
n that of male
rticipants
386) >
40%
articipants
488
0%
W: an ISO:9001:another 14.6%
ants
es (29.6%)
>45 (n=592)
17.00%
Male
Fema
:2008certified ins
% participants
e (n=1032)
ale (n=2456)
stitution
61
s were
32
27wpa
2.5% ST, 29.
7.8% participwere educated
articipants pa
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
5% OBC, 24.
ants were illitd upto 5-10th
assed 12th sta
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
ST (n=
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
Illitera(n=97
27.
.2% General a
Figure 79: C
terate. 24.5%h standard, 8andard.
Figure 80: Le
=1133) S
32.50%
ate 70)
1‐5t(n=85
.80%24.
and 13.8 % S
Caste distributio
% of the partic8.3% participa
evel of educatio
C (n=481)
13.80%
Caste of par
N=3488
th 56)
5‐10(n=11
.50%
33
Level of Ed
N=3488
SIHFWSC participant
on of Participant
ipants had scants studied
on of Participant
OBC (n=1030
29.50%
rticipants
8
0th 163)
11‐12(n=29
3.30%
8
ducation
8
W: an ISO:9001:ts were traine
ts
chooling uptotill 11-12th st
ts
) Gen (n=8
%24.2
2th 91)
>12(n=2
8.30%6.0
:2008certified ins
ed.
1-5th grade, 3tandard and
44)
20%
2th 08)
00%
stitution
62
33.3% 6.0%
DNTTTN T
M
of
1
5
District: Sikar NGO: BCT
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batches
he training a
March, 2012 c
f the invited p
1.6% PRI’s, 9
.7% SHG’s an
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
locks: 8
o be trained:
VHSC: 1229
s completed:
at Sikar starte
ompleting 98
participants (6
9.0% ANMs,
nd 39.6% oth
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
PRI (n=633)
11.60%
1253
9 : 136
ed in the firs
.1% of the tra
6621).
16.2% AWW
her members,
Figure 81
ANM (n=492)
A(n
%
9.00%
st week of Ju
aining. Actual
W’s, 17.3% As
participated.
1: Category wise
AWW n=889)
AS(n=9
16.20% 17
Categor
N=54
SIHFW
uly, 2010 .13
numbers of p
sha Sahyogin
divison of parti
S 948)
NGO (n=20)
7.30%
0.40%
ry of Participa
479
W: an ISO:9001:
36 batches w
participants tr
ni’s, 0.4% NG
icipants
MSS (n=11)
% 0.20%
nts
:2008certified ins
were conduct
rained were 8
GO’s, 0.2% M
SHG (n=314)
Ot(n=2
5.70%
3
stitution
63
ted till
82.8%
MSS’s,
thers 2172)
39.60%
Mbe
A
Maximum numelonged to th
As against 22
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Percen
tage
atten
dance
mber of partice age group o
.2 % males th
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
<
cipants (67.9of <25 years.
Figure 82: A
he group was
Figure 83: Sex d
<25 (n=860)
15.70%
77.8%
N
%) were from
Age distribution
s dominated b
distribution of Pa
25‐45 (
Age group of
N=547
22.2
N=5479
SIHFWm the age gr
n of Participants
by female (77
articipants
n=3718)
67.90%
f participants
79
2%
W: an ISO:9001:roup of 25-45
s
.8%) presenc
>45 (n=901
16.40
:2008certified ins
5 years and1
ce.
1)
0%
Male (n=1218
Female (n=42
stitution
64
15.7%
8)
261)
In
T
n line with tren
he education
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
0.
10.
20.
30.
40.
50.
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
nds observed
level wise dis
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
ST (n=1
3.5
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
Illiter(n=3
6.2
d with other di
Figure 84: Ca
stribution of p
Figure 85: Le
193) SC (
0%
C
rate 37)
1‐5t(n=10
20%
19
stricts, the O
ste distribution
participants is
evel of educatio
n=854) OB
15.60%
Caste of Partic
N=5479
th 089)
5‐10(n=25
9.90%
46
Level of ed
N=54
SIHFWBC presence
of Participants
s depicted in t
on of Participant
BC (n=3314)
60.50%
cipants
0th 518)
11‐12(n=7
6.00%
13
ducation
79
W: an ISO:9001: was (60.5%)
the bar diagra
ts
Gen (n=1118)
20.40%
2th 29)
>12(n=80
3.30% 14
:2008certified ins
) well palpable
am below:
th 06)
4.70%
stitution
65
e.
DNTTTN T
20
in
T
S
O13
District: Pali NGO: Ambuja
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batches
he training a
012 completin
nvited particip
he participatio
ahyogini’s, 1.
Once again the3.0 % particip
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
Percen
tage
of P
articipa
nts
Cement Fou
locks: 10
o be trained:
VHSC: 888 s completed:
t Pali started
ng 84.7 % of
pants (6727).
on pattern ob
.8% NGO’s, 3
e maximum ppants from ag
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
PRI (n=671)
11.50%
ndation
1049
: 129
d in the last w
the training.
bserved was:
3.7% MSS’s,
Figure 86: Cat
participation wge group of <2
ANM (n=605)
AW(n=
10.40%
week of July,
Actual numbe
11.5% PRI’s,
3.6% SHG’s
tegory wise divis
was (68.3 %) 25 years.
WW =961)
AS (n=77
16.50%
13.
Category
N=
SIHFW
, 2010. 129 b
ers of particip
, 10.4% ANM
and 39.1% ot
son of participa
from the age
1)NGO
(n=104)
30%
1.80%
y of Participant
=5810
W: an ISO:9001:
batches were
pants trained
Ms, 16.5% AW
ther members
nts
e group of 25-
MSS (n=216) (n
3.70%
ts
:2008certified ins
e trained till M
were 86.4%
WW’s, 13.3% A
s.
-45 years, wit
SHG n=211)
Othe(n=22
3.60%
39.
stitution
66
March
of the
ASHA
th just
ers 71)
10%
70
0% Female m
2
4
6
8
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
Figu
members appe
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
<
ure 87: Percenta
eared for the
Figure 88
<25 (n=756)
13.00%
7
age of participan
training as co
8: Sex distributio
25‐45 (n
68
Age group of
N=58
70.0%
N=5810
SIHFW
nts based on Ag
ompared to o
on of Participant
=3966)
8.30%
Participants
810
30.0%
0
W: an ISO:9001:
ge Group
nly 30% male
ts
>45 (n=1088)
18.70%
:2008certified ins
e participants
Male (n=1737
Female (n=40
stitution
67
7)
073)
49
Tbe
9.2% OBC, 2
he participanelow, with pa
0
10
20
30
40
50
Percen
tage
atten
dance
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
1.6% Genera
ts based on trticipants edu
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
ST (
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Illiterate(n=481
8.30%
al while 21.7%
Figure 89
he educationucated upto 5
Figure 90: Le
(n=436) SC
7.50%
e )
1‐5th (n=1400
%
24.10
% SC and 7.5
9: Caste distribut
al category a-10th standard
evel of educatio
C (n=1263)
21.70%
Caste of Par
N=5810
0)5‐10th (n=2570
0%
44.20
Level of Educ
N=5810
SIHFW% ST particip
tion of Participa
re distributedd (44.2%) dom
on of Participant
OBC (n=2857)
49.20%
rticipants
0
0)11‐12th(n=688)
0%
11.80
cation
0
W: an ISO:9001:pants were tra
ants
d as per the baminating the g
ts
Gen (n=125
21.6
h )
>12th (n=671)
0% 11.50
:2008certified ins
ained.
ar diagram plgroup.
54)
60%
)
0%
stitution
68
aced
DNTTTNTDag77
T
S
Nedfr
District: Naga
NGO: Rajastha
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batcheshe training at
Deedwana, Degainst the tot7.6 % of the i
he total part
ahyogini’s, 0.
Note: Data oducation courom the total
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
Percen
tage
of P
articipa
nts
aur an Mahila Ka
locks: 11
o be trained:
VHSC: 1565s completed:t Nagaur staregana, Parbatal of 1676 Vnvited particip
ticipants train
.6% NGO’s, 2
n bifurcatiould not be o cannot be p
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
PRI (n=1054)
11.90%
alyan Mandal
1676
5 : 204 rted in the lasatsar and MaVHSCs was cpants (11392
ned are: 11.
2.6 % MSS’s,
Figure 91: Cat
n of participobtained for presented.
ANM (n=902)
AW(n=1
10.20%16
st week of Junakrana startecompleted. A2).
9% PRI’s, 1
7.5% SHG’s
tegory wise divis
pants basedthe initial m
WW 1479)
AS (n=1516)
6.70% 17.10%
Category of
N=8843
SIHFW
ne, 2010 at 5ed.Till date traActual numbe
0.2% ANMs,
and 36.0% o
son of participa
d on age gromonths hence
)NGO (n=51)
M(n=
%
0.60%3
f Participants
3
W: an ISO:9001:
5 blocks nameaining of 204ers of particip
, 16.7% AW
other member
nts
oup, caste, e the percen
MSS =282)
SHG (n=373
3.20% 4.20%
:2008certified ins
ely Kuchaman4 batches (93pants trained
WW’s, 17.1%
rs.
sex and levntage distrib
)Others (n=3186)
%
36.00%
stitution
69
n city, 3.4%) were
Asha
vel of bution
DNTTTN
T
co
th
10
4
District: Kota NGO: Rajastha
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batches
he training a
onducted, com
he invited part
0.8% PRI’s, 4
.8% SHG’s an
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
Percen
tage
of P
articipa
nts
an Voluntary
locks: 5
o be trained:
VHSC: 802
s completed:
at Kota starte
mpleting 98.6
ticipants (556
4.7% ANMs,
nd 51.1% oth
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
PRI (n=554)
10.80%
Health Assoc
813
: 116
ed in the se
6% of the trai
65).
12.7% AWW
her members,
Figure 92: Cat
ANM (n=242)
A(n
4.70%
1
ciation
econd week
ning. Actual n
W’s, 11.0% As
were trained
tegory wise divis
AWW =653)
AS (n=56
12.70% 11.0
Category
N=
SIHFW
of July, 201
number of pa
sha Sahyogin
.
son of participa
65)NGO (n=70)
00%
1.40%
y of Participan
=5141
W: an ISO:9001:
0. Total of 1
articipants tra
ni’s, 1.4% NG
nts
MSS (n=179) (n
3.50%
nts
:2008certified ins
116 batches
ined was 92.4
GO’s, 3.5% M
SHG n=249)
Othe(n=26
4.80%
51.1
stitution
70
were
4% of
MSS’s,
ers 29)
10%
74be
65
4.3 % particielonging to <2
5.1% Female
0
20
40
60
80
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pants belong25 years age
es were traine
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
<2
ged to the ag group while
Figure 93: A
ed as compare
Figure 94: Se
25 (n=690)
13.40%
A
65.1
ge group of 212.2 % partic
Age distribution
ed to only 34.
ex distribution o
25‐45 (n=
7
Age group of P
N=5141
%
N=5141
SIHFW25-45 years, cipants were f
n of participants
.9% males
of Participants
=3822)
74.30%
Participants
34.9%
1
W: an ISO:9001:followed by 1from age grou
s
>45 (n=629)
12.20%
M
F
:2008certified ins
13.4% particiup >45 years.
Male (n=1792)
emale (n=3349
stitution
71
ipants
9)
46at
6(4
6.8% of the Ottended the tr
.8% participa47.9%) howev
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
0
10
20
30
40
50
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
OBC, 18.8% rainings.
ants were illitever were educ
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
ST (n
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
Illite(n=3
ST, 20.0% S
Figure 95
erate. 28.9% cated upto 5-
Figure 96: Le
n=968) SC
18.80%
erate 349)
1‐(n=
6.80%
2
C and 14.4 %
5: Caste distribut
of the partici10th standard
evel of educatio
C (n=1029)
20.00%
Caste of Par
N=5141
‐5th 1488)
5(n=
28.90%
Level of Educ
N=514
SIHFW% participants
tion of Participa
pants studiedd.
on of Participant
OBC (n=2405)
46.80%
rticipants
1
‐10th =2465)
1(
47.90%
cation
41
W: an ISO:9001:s General Ca
ants
d till 1-5th gra
ts
) Gen (n=7
%
14.4
11‐12th n=436)
8.50%
:2008certified ins
tegory partici
ade. The max
39)
40%
>12th (n=403)
7.80%
stitution
72
ipants
ximum
DNTTTNT
w
T
S
District: Karau
NGO: ECAT B
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batcheshe training at
were trained. A
he participan
ahyogini’s, 0.
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
uli Bodhgram
locks: 5
o be trained:
VHSC: 715 s completed:t Karauli start
Actual numbe
nts distributio
.6% NGO’s, 8
PRI (n=490)
13.30%
888
: 92 ed in the last
ers of participa
on was 13.3
8.0% MSS’s,
Figure 97:
ANM (n=336)
AW(n=
9.10%
20
week of July
ants trained w
3% PRI’s, 9
0.8% SHG’s
: Category wise
WW 773)
AS (n=724
0.90%19.6
Category of
N=36
SIHFW
y, 2010. By M
were 68.8% o
9.1% ANMs,
and 27.6% w
divison of parti
4)NGO (n=23)
60%
0.60%
f Participants
690
W: an ISO:9001:
arch, 2012, 9
f the invited p
20.9% AWW
were other me
cipants
MSS (n=296)
S(n
8.00%
:2008certified ins
92 batches (80
participants (5
W’s, 19.6%
mbers.
SHG =30)
Other(n=101
0.80%
27.60
stitution
73
0.5%)
5360).
Asha
rs 18)
0%
7be
72
1.0 % participelonged to >4
2.7% of Fema
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pants belong45 years age
ales and 27.3
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
<25
ged to the agegroup while o
Figure 98
3% males atte
Figure 99: Se
(n=563)
15.30%
A
72.7%
e group 25-45only 15.3 % p
8: Age distrinutio
ended the trai
x distribution of
25‐45 (n=2
71
Age group of Pa
N=3690
%
N=3690
SIHFW5 years, followparticipants we
on of participan
ining.
f Participants
2621)
.00%
articipants
0
27.3%
0
W: an ISO:9001:wed by 13.7%ere from age
ts
>45 (n=506)
13.60%
:2008certified ins
% participantsgroup <25 ye
%
Male (n=1007
Female (n=26
stitution
74
s who ears.
7)
683)
3K
4
1.9% OBC, 3Karauli.
.6% participa
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
32.3% genera
nts were illite
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
ST (n=
2
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Illitera(n=17
4.60
al, 14.1% SC
Figure 10
rate while ma
Figure 101: L
=800) SC
21.70%
ate 0)
1‐5th(n=86
0%
23.6
C and 21.7 %
00: Caste distribu
ajority (49.5%
Level of educatio
(n=522) OB
14.10%
Caste of Partic
N=3690
h 69)
5‐10t(n=18
60%
49.
Level of Ed
N=369
SIHFW% ST were tra
ution of Particip
%) was educat
on of Participan
BC (n=1177)
31.90%
cipants
th 27)
11‐12(n=41
50%
11
ducation
90
W: an ISO:9001:ained during
pants
ted upto 5-10t
nts
Gen (n=1191)
32.30%
2th 14)
>12(n=4
1.20% 11.
:2008certified ins
VHSC trainin
th standard.
%
th 10)
.10%
stitution
75
ngs at
DNTTTNT
co
to
ac
pa
O
S
District: Jodhp
NGO: SURE, U
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batcheshe training a
onducted till 3
o reallocate th
ccomplish the
articipants tra
Of the total (
ahyogini’s, 9.
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pur URMUL
locks: 9
o be trained:
VHSC: 1588
s completed:at Jodhpur st
31st of Decem
he area and o
e feat. By the
ained was 88.
(10374), 8.9
.7% NGO’s, 8
PRI (n=919)
A(n
8.90%
1912
8 : 240
tarted in the
mber, 2010 wh
one more NG
e end of Marc
.4% of the inv
% were PR
8.3% MSS’s,
Figure 10
ANM =812)
AW(n=15
7.80%
1
second wee
hich left a bac
O (URMUL) w
ch, 2012, 83
vited participa
I members,
14.6% SHG’s
02: Category wis
WW 565)
AS (n=1017
5.10%
9.80
Category
N
SIHFW
ek of August,
cklog of 90.1
was barged i
.1% VHSCs w
ants (11739).
7.8% ANMs
s and 25.8% o
se divison of pa
7)NGO
(n=1002)
0% 9.70%
y of Participan
N=10374
W: an ISO:9001:
, 2010. Only
% which com
n, in Decemb
were trained
s, 15.1% AW
other membe
rticipants
MSS (n=865) (n
%8.30%
nts
:2008certified ins
26 batches
mpelled the sy
ber, 2010, to t
.Actual numb
WW’s, 9.8%
ers.
SHG n=1517)
Oth(n=2
14.60%
2
stitution
76
were
ystem
timely
ber of
Asha
hers 2677)
25.80%
65gr
T
5.1 % particiroup of >45 w
here were 75
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pants belonwhile 16.1%b
5.2% of Fema
Fi
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
<25
ged to the abelong to < 25
Figure 103
ales compared
igure 104: Sex d
(n=1674)
16.10%
Age
75.2%
N
age group 255 age group
: Age distributio
d to only 24.8
distribution of Pa
25‐45 (n=67
65.1
e group of Par
N=10374
24.8%
%
N=10374
SIHFW-45 years, 18
on of participan
8% male partic
articipants
757) >45
10%
rticipants
4
%
W: an ISO:9001:8.4% particip
ts
cipants.
5 (n=1943)
18.70%
:2008certified ins
pants were in
Male (n=2568
Female (n=78
stitution
77
n age
8)
806)
58wS
Tpa
8.8% of the was only 21.7
T category.
he educationarticipants we
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
OBC particip%, SC partic
nal level of ere illiterate.
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
ST (n
0.00%
5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
0.00%
Illite(n=2
2
pant’s attendecipation accou
Figure 1
participants
Figure 106: L
n=335) SC
3.20%
erate 2131)
1‐5(n=29
20.50%
2
ed the traininunted for 16.2
105: Caste distri
predominant
Level of educatio
C (n=1685)
16.20%
Caste of Par
N=10374
5th 990)
5‐10(n=36
8.80%
35.
Level of Ed
N=103
SIHFWn sessions G2% and 3.2 %
bution of Partic
ly was from
on of Participan
OBC (n=6104)
58.80%
rticipants
4
0th 696)
11‐12(n=84
.60%
8
ducation
374
W: an ISO:9001:General categ% participant
cipants
5-10th stand
nts
Gen (n=225
22.7
2th 44)
>12t(n=71
.10% 6.9
:2008certified ins
ory represens belonged to
dard while 3
54)
0%
h 13)
90%
stitution
78
ntation o and
35.6%
DNTTTNT
C
A
1
an
District: Jhunj
NGO: SRKPS
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batcheshe training at
Chirawa starte
Actual number
1.9% ANMs,
nd 32.4% oth
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
jhunu
locks: 8
o be trained:
VHSC: 1001
s completed:t Jhunjhunu s
ed. By March
r of participan
17.4% AWW
her members,
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
PRI (n=719)
12.30%
1001
: 131
started in the
2012, 131 ba
nts trained wa
W’s, 20.9% As
attended the
Figure 107
ANM (n=697)
A(n=
% 11.90%
last week of J
atches were c
as 91.3% of t
sha Sahyogin
e trainings.
7: Category wise
AWW =1021)
AS (n=12
17.40%
20
Category
N=58
SIHFW
July, 2010 at
onducted, co
the invited pa
ni’s, 0.6% NG
e divison of part
21)NGO (n=36)
0.90%
0.60%
y of Participan
855
W: an ISO:9001:
2 blocks nam
ompleting 10
articipants (64
GO’s, 1.7% M
ticipants
MSS (n=99) (n
%1.70%
nts
:2008certified ins
mely jhunjhun
0% of the trai
413). 12.3% P
SS’s, 2.8% S
SHG n=164)
Othe(n=18
2.80%
32
stitution
79
u and
ining.
PRI’s,
SHG’s
ers 898)
2.40%
74be
F
4.9 % participelonged to >4
emale particip
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pants belonge45 years age
pants (85.6%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
<
ed to the agegroup.Only 1
Figure 1
%) again outwi
Figure 10
25 (n=663)
11.30%
A
e group 25-451.3 % particip
108: Age distribu
tted the male
09: Sex distributi
25‐45 (n=
7
Age group of P
N=5855
85.6%
N=5855
SIHFW5 years, followpants were fro
ution of particip
es (14.4%).
ion of Participan
=4386)
74.90%
Participants
5
14.4%
5
W: an ISO:9001:wed by 13.8%om age group
pants
nts
>45 (n=806)
13.80%
:2008certified ins
% participantsp <25 years.
Male (n=842)
Female (n=50
stitution
80
s who
)
013)
623
ofed13
2.9% of the O.7 % ST categ
f the 5855, ducation upto3.0% particip
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
Percen
tage
atten
dance
1
2
3
4
5
6
Percen
tage
atten
dance
OBC participagory participa
3.1% were o 5-10th standants qualified
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
ST (n
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Illit(n=
3
ant’s attendedants attended
Figure
illiterate, 14.4dard and anotd 12th standar
Figure 1
n=216) SC
3.70%
terate =181)
1‐(n=
3.10%
1
the training s.
e 110: Caste dist
4% were edther 16.6% pad.
111: Level of edu
C (n=1427)
24.40%
Caste of Pa
N=5
‐5th =841)
5‐1(n=3
14.40%
5
Level of
N=5
SIHFWsessions whil
tribution of Part
ucated upto articipants stu
ucation of Partic
OBC (n=3682
62.90%
articipants
5855
10th 3099)
11‐(n=
52.90%
1
Education
5855
W: an ISO:9001:e 24.4% SC,
ticipants
1-5th grade,udied till 11-1
cipants
2) Gen (n=5
%
9.1
‐12th =970)
>1(n=
16.60%1
:2008certified ins
9.1% Genera
, 52.9% had2th standard.
530)
10%
12th =764)
13.00%
stitution
81
al and
their Only
DNTTTNT
B
A
10
0
District: Jhala
NGO: IIRD
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batcheshe training at
akani, Khanp
Actual number
0.5% of the t
.5% NGO’s, 6
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
awar
locks: 6
o be trained:
VHSC: 1492
s completed:t Jhalawar st
pur and M.tha
r of participan
trained were
6.4% MSS’s,
PRI (n=1027) (n
10.50%
1492
2 : 214 tarted in June
ana.214 batchnts trained wa
PRI members
3.7% SHG’s
Figure 11
ANM n=426)
AW(n=10
4.30%
10
e, 2010 at all
hes (100%) was 93.8% of th
s, 4.3% ANM
and 51.8% w
2: Category wis
WW 034)
AS (n=1199
0.60%12.20
Category o
N=
SIHFW
the 6 blocks
were complehe invited part
Ms, 10.6% AW
were other me
e divison of par
9)NGO (n=50)
0%
0.50%
of Participants
=9797
W: an ISO:9001:
s namely J.Pa
eted till 31st ticipants (104
WW’s, 12.2%
embers.
rticipants
MSS (n=624)
S(n=
6.40%3
s
:2008certified ins
atan, Pirawa,
of October,444).
Asha Sahyo
HG =361)
Other(n=507
3.70%
51.80
stitution
82
Dug,
2010.
gini’s,
rs 76)
0%
65ye
O
5.8 % participears of age w
Once again Fe
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
Percen
tage
atten
dance
pnats belongewhile only 15.7
Figu
emale (61.1%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
<25 (n
ed to the age 7 % participan
ure 113: Percent
%) outmaneuve
Figure 11
n=1804)
18.40%
Age
61.1%
group 25-45 nts were from
tage of participa
ered the male
14: Sex distributi
25‐45 (n=645
65.80
group of Parti
N=9797
N=9797
SIHFWyears, 18.4%
m age group >
ants based on A
e’s participant
ion of Participan
50) >45
0%
icipants
38.9%
7
W: an ISO:9001:% participnats >45 years.
Age Group
ts (38.9%) in
nts
(n=1543)
15.70%
:2008certified ins
belonged to <
attendance.
Male (n=3811
Female (n=59
stitution
83
<25
1)
986)
CS
1gr10
Class specific C.
1.9% participrades, 33.9%0.2% particip
1
2
3
4
5
6
Percen
tage
atten
dance
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
distribution of
pants were ill% studied from
ants passed
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
ST (
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Illitera(n=116
11.9
f attendees w
Figure 11
literate. 34.1%m 5-10th stand
12th standard
Figure 116: L
(n=1298) SC
13.20%
ate 65)
1‐5th(n=333
90%
34.1
was 55.0% OB
15: Caste distribu
% of the parard, 10.0% w.
Level of educatio
C (n=1298) O
13.20%
Caste of Part
N=9797
h 37)
5‐10t(n=33
10% 33.
Level of Ed
N=9797
SIHFWBC, 18.5% Ge
ution of Particip
rticipants hadwere educated
on of Participan
OBC (n=5389)
55.00%
ticipants
th 18)
11‐12(n=97
.90%
10
ducation
7
W: an ISO:9001:eneral 13.2%
pants
d their educatd between 11
nts
Gen (n=1812)
18.50%
2th 78)
>12(n=99
0.00% 10
:2008certified ins
ST and 13.2
tion between-12th standar
)
th 99)
0.20%
stitution
84
%
n 1-5th rd and
DNTTTNTtitr
P
0
District: Jalore
NGO: Vaatsaly
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batcheshe training all March, 201ained was 91
RI’s accounte
.1% NGO’s, 0
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
Percen
tage
of P
articipa
nts
e ya
locks: 7
o be trained:
VHSC: 849 s completed:at Jalore sta12 completin.9% of the in
ed for 12.7%
0.8% MSS’s,
PRI (n=706) (
12.70%
840
: 121
rted in the fing 101.1 % ovited participa
% followed by
3.7% SHG’s
Figure 11
ANM (n=620)
AW(n=1
11.10%
18
irst week of of the total trants (6066).
11.1% ANM
and 42.1% ot
7: Category wis
WW 1012)
AS (n=636
8.20%
11.4
Category o
N=55
SIHFW
June, 2010. raining targe
s, 18.2% AW
ther members
e divison of par
)NGO (n=4)
0%
0.10%
of Participants
573
W: an ISO:9001:
121 batcheset. Actual num
WW’s, 11.4%
s.
rticipants
MSS (n=43)
S(n=
0.80%3
s
:2008certified ins
s were condumber of partici
Asha Sahyo
HG =208)
Other(n=234
.70%
42.10
stitution
85
ucted ipants
gini’s,
rs 44)
0%
72ye
M
2.9 % participears age grou
Male participat
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pants belongeup while but th
tion (31.8%) w
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
<2
ed to the age he youngster
Figure
was overreac
Figure 119:
25 (n=617)
11.10%
Ag
68.2
group 25-45 rs (>25 years
118: Age distrib
ched by Fema
Sex distribution
25‐45 (n=4
72
ge group of Pa
N=557
2%
N=5573
SIHFWyears, 16.1%of age) accou
bution of partici
ale participatio
n of Participants
4060) >4
.90%
articipants
73
31.8%
3
W: an ISO:9001:% participnats
unted for 11.1
ipants
on (68.2%).
s
45 (n=896)
16.10%
:2008certified ins
belonged to >1%.
Male (n=1774
Female (n=37
stitution
86
>45
4)
799)
5ca
Tgr12
1.7% OBC paategory cand
he educationrade 32.7% e2th standard.
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
articipants attidates out of t
nal distributioneducated upto
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
ST (n=
7.5
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
Illitera(n=17
31
ended the trathe total.
Figure 12
n of the partio 5-10th stand
Figure 121: L
418) SC (
50%
ate 60)
1‐5t(n=10
.60%
19
aining, only 7.
20: Caste distribu
cipants was: dard, 8.6% st
Level of educatio
(n=1313) O
23.60%
Caste of Parti
N=5573
th 064)
5‐10(n=18
.10%
32
Level of Ed
N=5573
SIHFW5 % attendan
ution of Particip
31.6% illiteratudied till 11-
on of Participan
OBC (n=2882)
51.70%
icipants
0th 824)
11‐12(n=48
2.70%
8.6
ducation
3
W: an ISO:9001:nce was obse
pants
ate, 19.1% e12th standard
nts
Gen (n=960
17.20
2th 81)
>12(n=4
60% 8
:2008certified ins
erved for ST
ducated upto and 8.0% pa
0)
0%
th 31)
8.00%
stitution
87
o 1-5th assed
DNTTTN T
8
nu
ye
T
7
72be
District: Jaisa
NGO: URMUL
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batches
he training at
1 batches co
umber of par
et to be cover
he total train
.9% Asha Sa
2.8 % participelonged to >4
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
lmer L
locks: 3
o be trained:
VHSC: 680 s completed:
t Jaisalmer s
ompleted till
rticipants train
red.
ed participan
hyogini’s, 5.6
pants from ag45 years age
PRI (n=648) (
17.30%
680
: 81
tarted concur
March, 2012
ned was 87.3
nts can be ca
6% NGO’s, 14
Figure 122
ge group of 25and only 11.1
ANM (n=283)
AW(n=
7.60%
1
rrently in 2 b
2 completing3% of the inv
ategorized as
4.9% MSS’s, 2
2: Category wise
5-45 years att1% participan
WW =428)
AS (n=295
11.50%
7.9
Category o
N=37
SIHFW
locks namely
g 100% of th
ited strength
: 17.3% PRI’
21.6% SHG’s
e divison of part
tended the trants were from
5)NGO
(n=211)
90%
5.60%
of Participants
736
W: an ISO:9001:
y Jaisalmer a
he VHSC to
4279 leaving
s, 7.6% ANM
s and 13.6% o
ticipants
anings, 16.1%age group of
MSS (n=558) (
14.90%
:2008certified ins
nd Sam. A to
be trained. A
g a backlog o
Ms, 11.5% AW
other membe
% participantsf <25 years
SHG n=80.6)
Oth(n=
21.60%
1
stitution
88
otal of
Actual
of 543
WW’s,
rs.
hers 507)
13.60%
65
52
5.5% Female
2.4% general
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
e participants
l, 24.6% OBC
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
<25
Figure 1
were trained
Figure 124
C, 17.9% SC a
(n=415)
11.10%
Ag
65.5%
123: Age distribu
compared to
4: Sex distributi
and 5.0 % ST
25‐45 (n=27
72.8
e group of Par
N=3736
N=3736
SIHFW
ution of Particip
only 34.5% m
on of Participan
T category pa
719) >4
0%
rticipants
6
34.5%
6
W: an ISO:9001:
ants
male.
nts
rticipants wer
45 (n=602)
16.10%
:2008certified ins
re trained.
Male (n=1288
Female (n=24
stitution
89
8)
448)
Tgr
he maximumrade while 21
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00Pe
rcen
tage
Atten
dance
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
m participation.0% participa
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
ST (n=
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
Illite(n=7
21
Figure
n (31.4%) waants were illite
Figure 126
=188) S
5.00%
rate 786)
1‐5(n=1
.00%
3
125: Caste distr
as from thoserate.
6: Level of educa
SC (n=669)
17.90%
Caste of Pa
N=3736
5th 172)
5‐10(n=8
1.40%
2
Level of E
N=3736
SIHFW
ribution of Part
e who had c
ation of Particip
OBC (n=920
24.60
articipants
6
0th 883)
11‐1(n=5
23.60%
1
ducation
6
W: an ISO:9001:
icipants
completed sc
pants
0) Gen (n=
%
5
12th 569)
12t(n=3
15.20%
9
:2008certified ins
chooling upto
=1959)
52.40%
th 48)
9.30%
stitution
90
o 1-5th
DNTTTN
T
w
tr
T
14
District: Rajsa
NGO: RVHA
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batches
he training at
were conducte
ained was 78
he distributio
4.5% Asha S
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
amand
locks: 7
o be trained:
VHSC: 958 s completed:
t Rajsamand
ed completin
8.2% of the in
on of the tota
ahyogini’s, 0.
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
PRI (n=728)
14.90%
969
: 153
started in No
g 98.9% of t
vited participa
al trained par
.3% NGO’s, 1
Figure 127
ANM (n=277)
A(n
5.70%
ovember, 201
the VHSC to
ants (6240).
rticipants is:
1.9% MSS’s, 2
7: Category wise
AWW n=803)
AS(n=70
16.50%
14
Category of P
N=4
SIHFW
10. By the en
o be trained.
14.9% PRI’s
2.8% SHG’s a
e divison of part
S 05)
NGO (n=14)
4.50%
0.30%
Participants
4878
W: an ISO:9001:
nd of March, 2
Actual numb
s, 5.7% ANM
and 43.5% ot
ticipants
MSS (n=92)
% 1.90%
:2008certified ins
2012, 153 ba
ber of partici
Ms, 16.5% AW
ther members
SHG (n=138)
Ot(n=2
2.80%
4
stitution
91
atches
ipants
WW’s,
s.
hers 2121)
3.50%
69be
A
9.2 % particielonged to >4
As against 77.
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pants belong45 years age
6% Female p
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
<25
ged to age grgroup while o
Figure 128
participation th
Figure 129
(n=764)
15.70%
Ag
roup of 25-45only 15.7% pa
8: Age distributio
he male partic
9: Sex distributi
25‐45 (n=33
69.2
e group of Par
N=4878
2
77.6%
N=4878
SIHFW5 years followarticipants we
on of participan
cipation was
on of Participan
378) >4
0%
rticipants
8
22.4%
8
W: an ISO:9001:wed by 15.1%ere from age g
nts
restricted to o
nts
45 (n=736)
15.10%
:2008certified ins
% participantsgroup <25 ye
only 22.4%.
Male (n=1094
Female (n=37
stitution
92
s who ars
4)
784)
32cabe
1mst
2.4% of the pategory particelonged to SC
1.3% participmaximum of 44tandard and 8
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
0
10
20
30
40
50
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
participants acipants attendC and ST cate
pants were ill4.0% had sch8.0% participa
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
ST (n=
7
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Illite(n=5
11
attending the ded the trainegory respec
Figure
iterate. 26.3%hooling from 5ants have pas
Figure 131: L
=345) S
7.10%
erate 550)
1‐5(n=1
1.30%
26
training beloings as comptively.
130: Caste distr
% of the part5-10th standarssed 12th stan
Level of educatio
SC (n=603)
12.40%
Caste of Pa
N=4878
5th 283)
5‐10(n=21
6.30%
4
Level of E
N=4878
SIHFWnged to genepared to 12.4
ribution of Part
ticipants wererd, 10.5% parndard.
on of Participan
OBC (n=235
48.90
articipants
8
0th 147)
11‐1(n=5
44.00%
10
ducation
8
W: an ISO:9001:eral category 4% and 7.1 %
icipants
e educated urticipants had
nts
1) Gen (n=
%
3
2th 10)
12t(n=38
0.50%8
:2008certified ins
while 48.2% % participants
upto primary d studied till 1
=1579)
32.40%
th 88)
.00%
stitution
93
OBC s who
while 1-12th
DNTTTNIn
A
15
4
District: Bhara
NGO: LUPIN
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batchesn Bharatpur 1
Actual number
5.7% PRI’s, 5
.2% SHG’s an
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
atpur
locks: 9
o be trained:
VHSC: 1451
s completed:195 batches
r of participan
5.7% ANMs,
nd 43.7% oth
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
PRI (n=1468)
15.70%
1454
: 195
were conduc
nts trained wa
12.57% AWW
her members,
Figure 132
ANM (n=532)
A(n=
5.70%
cted till Marc
as 95.8% of th
W’s, 13.5% A
attended the
2: Category wise
AWW =1167)
AS (n=126
12.50% 13.
Category
N=93
SIHFW
ch, 2012 com
he invited part
Asha Sahyogin
e trainings.
e divison of part
67)NGO
(n=188)
50%
2.00%
y of Participan
353
W: an ISO:9001:
mpleting 99.8
ticipants (976
ni’s, 2.0% NG
ticipants
MSS (n=246) (n
%2.60%
nts
:2008certified ins
8% of the tra
68).
GO’s, 2.6% M
SHG n=396)
Othe(n=40
4.20%
43
stitution
94
aining.
MSS’s,
ers 089)
3.70%
70be
F
0.2 % participelonged to >4
emale particip
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pants belonge45 years age
pants (62.4%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
<2
ed to the agegroup.Only 1
Figure 1
%) again outwi
Figure 13
25 (n=1186)
12.70%
A
62.
e group 25-452.7 % particip
133: Age distribu
tted the male
34: Sex distributi
25‐45 (n=
7
Age group of P
N=9353
4%
N=9353
SIHFW5 years, followpants were fro
ution of particip
es (37.6%).
ion of Participan
=6562) >
70.20%
Participants
3
37.6%
W: an ISO:9001:wed by 17.2%om age group
pants
nts
>45 (n=1605)
17.20%
%
:2008certified ins
% participantsp <25 years.
Male (n=3521
Female (n=58
stitution
95
s who
1)
832)
60an
ofed10
0.3% of the Ond 3.5 % ST
f the 9353, ducation upto0.3% particip
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
Percen
tage
atten
dance
10
20
30
40
50
Percen
tage
atten
dance
OBC participacategory part
6.8% were o 5-10th standants qualified
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
ST (n
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Illit(n=
6
ant’s attendeticipants atten
Figure
illiterate, 21.9dard and anotd 12th standar
Figure 1
n=324) SC
3.50%
terate =638)
1‐(n=
6.80%
2
d the trainingnded.
e 135: Caste dist
9% were edther 12.2% pad.
136: Level of edu
C (n=1574)
16.80%
Caste of Pa
N=9
‐5th 2046)
5‐(n=
21.90%
Level of
N=9
SIHFWg sessions w
tribution of Part
ucated upto articipants stu
ucation of Partic
OBC (n=5643
60.30%
articipants
9353
‐10th =4562)
11(n=
48.80%
f Education
9353
W: an ISO:9001:hile 16.8% S
ticipants
1-5th grade,udied till 11-1
cipants
3) Gen (n=1
%
19
‐12th =1139)
>1(n=
12.20%1
:2008certified ins
SC, 19.4% Ge
, 48.8% had2th standard.
812)
9.40%
12th =968)
10.30%
stitution
96
eneral
their Only
DNTTTN
T
tr
(8
T
16
District: Alwar
NGO: HPPI
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batches
he training a
ained against
8385).
he total train
6.8% Asha S
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
r
locks: 14
o be trained:
VHSC: 1114
s completed:
t Alwar starte
t the target. A
ed participan
ahyogini’s, 0.
PRI (n=805) (
11.70%
2145
4 : 160
ed November
Actual numbe
nts can be ca
.9% NGO’s, 1
Figure 137
ANM (n=470)
AW(n=1
6.80%
1
r, 2010.Till M
er of participan
ategorized as
1.3% MSS’s, 6
7: Category wise
WW 1201)
AS (n=115
17.50%
16.8
Category o
N=686
SIHFW
March, 2012, O
nts trained wa
: 11.7% PRI’
6.2% SHG’s a
e divison of part
52)NGO (n=60)
80%
0.90%
of Participants
69
W: an ISO:9001:
Only 51.9% o
as 81.9% of t
s, 6.8% ANM
and 38.9% ot
ticipants
MSS (n=88) (
1.30%
:2008certified ins
of the VHSC
the invited str
Ms, 17.5% AW
ther members
SHG (n=423)
Oth(n=2
6.20%
3
stitution
97
were
rength
WW’s,
s.
hers 2670)
38.90%
76be
79
6.9 % participelonged to >4
9.1% Female
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pants from ag45 years age
e participants
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
<25
ge group of 25and only 11.6
Figure 1
were trained
Figure 139
(n=794)
11.60%
Ag
7
5-45 years att6% participan
138: Age distribu
compared to
9: Sex distributi
25‐45 (n=52
76.9
e group of Par
N=6869
20.
79.1%
N=6869
SIHFW
tended the trants were from
ution of Particip
only 21.1% m
on of Participan
279) >4
0%
rticipants
9
9%
9
W: an ISO:9001:
anings, 11.6%age group of
ants
male.
nts
45 (n=796)
11.60%
:2008certified ins
% participantsf <25 years
Male (n=1452
Female (n=54
stitution
98
2)
417)
18
Tgr
8% general, 5
he maximumrade while 9%
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00Pe
rcen
tage
Atten
dance
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
50.4% OBC, 2
m participation% participants
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
ST (n=
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
Illite(n=6
9.
25.6% SC an
Figure
n (52.7%) was were illiterat
Figure 141
=412) SC
6.00%
rate 621)
1‐5(n=1
.00%1
nd 6% ST cate
140: Caste distr
as from thosete.
1: Level of educa
C (n=1756)
25.60%
Caste of Pa
N=6869
5th 148)
5‐10(n=36
6.70%
5
Level of E
N=6869
SIHFWegory particip
ribution of Part
e who had co
ation of Particip
OBC (n=346
50.40
articipants
9
0th 619)
11‐1(n=7
52.70%
11
ducation
9
W: an ISO:9001:pants were tra
icipants
ompleted sch
pants
2) Gen (n=
0%
1
12th 784)
12t(n=6
1.40% 10
:2008certified ins
ained.
hooling upto
=1239)
18.00%
th 697)
0.10%
stitution
99
5-10th
DNTTTN
A
pr
M
ba
64
tr
T
14
District: Udaip
NGO: JJVS
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batches
After much ad
roblems in fu
March 2012, th
atches.
4.1% particip
ainings were
he total train
4.9% Asha S
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pur
locks: 11
o be trained:
VHSC: 458
s completed:
do the training
und transfer t
he NGO was
pants of the
done.
ed participan
ahyogini’s, 1.
PRI (n=226)
12.20%
2465
: 47
g at Udaipur
to the NGO c
s able to com
total invited
nts can be ca
.2% NGO’s, 3
Figure 142
ANM (n=167)
AW(n=
9.00%
started June
concerned, th
mplete only 18
strength (289
ategorized as
3.7% MSS’s, 3
2: Category wise
WW =343)
AS (n=277
18.50%
14.9
Category o
N=18
SIHFW
in all the 11
he trainings w
8.6% of the to
93) were trai
: 12.2% PRI’
3.5% SHG’s a
e divison of part
7)NGO (n=22)
90%
1.20%
of Participants
853
W: an ISO:9001:
blocks simu
were put at h
otal target to
ined. Further
s, 6.0% ANM
and 37.0% ot
ticipants
MSS (n=69)
3.70%
:2008certified ins
ltaneously. D
halt. As a res
be achieved
r in Septemb
Ms, 18.5% AW
ther members
SHG (n=64)
Oth(n=6
3.50%
37
stitution
100
Due to
ult by
in 47
ber no
WW’s,
s.
hers 685)
7.00%
72be
70
2.6 % participelonged to >4
0.6% Female
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pants from ag45 years age
e participants
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
<25
ge group of 25and only 9.8%
Figure 1
were trained
Figure 144
(n=182)
9.80%
Ag
70.6%
5-45 years att% participants
143: Age distribu
compared to
4: Sex distributi
25‐45 (n=13
72.6
e group of Par
N=185
%
N=1853
SIHFWtended the tras were from a
ution of Particip
only 29.4% m
on of Participan
346) >4
0%
rticipants
53
29.4%
3
W: an ISO:9001:anings, 17.5%age group of <
ants
male.
nts
45 (n=325)
17.50%
:2008certified ins
% participants<25 years
Male (n=545)
Female (n=13
stitution
101
)
308)
23
Tgr
3.0% general
he maximumrade while 4.5
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00Pe
rcen
tage
Atten
dance
0
10
20
30
40
50
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
l, 19.2% OBC
m participation5% participan
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
ST (n=
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
Illite(n=
4.
C, 5.8% SC an
Figure
n (43.1%) wants were illiter
Figure 146
=964) S
52.00%
rate 74)
1‐5(n=6
.50%
3
nd 52.0% ST
145: Caste distr
as from thoserate.
6: Level of educa
SC (n=107)
5.80%
Caste of Pa
N=1853
5th 624)
5‐10(n=7
33.70%
4
Level of E
N=1853
SIHFWcategory par
ribution of Part
e who had co
ation of Particip
OBC (n=355
19.20
articipants
3
0th 798)
11‐1(n=1
43.10%
10
ducation
3
W: an ISO:9001:rticipants were
icipants
ompleted sch
pants
5) Gen (n
0% 2
12th 185)
12t(n=1
0.00% 8
:2008certified ins
e trained.
hooling upto
=427)
23.00%
th 62)
8.70%
stitution
102
5-10th
DNTTTN
A
co
st
T
12
m
District: Chitto
NGO: CUTS
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batches
After much d
oncuurrently
trength of 107
he total train
2.3% Asha S
member partic
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
orgrah
locks: 11
o be trained:
VHSC: 1541s completed:
delay the tra
in all the 11
749 participan
ed participan
Sahyogini’s, 0
cipated.
PRI (n=891) (
10.80%
1564
: 199
aining at chi
1 blocks. Till
nts.
nts can be ca
.4% NGO’s, 2
Figure 147
ANM (n=457)
AW(n=1
5.60%
1
ttorgarh dist
January, 20
ategorized as
2.1% SHG’s
7: Category wise
WW 1363)
AS (n=101
16.60%
12.3
Category o
N=82
SIHFW
trict started
012, 76.5% w
: 10.8% PRI’
and 51.5 % o
e divison of part
13)NGO (n=33)
30%
0.40%
of Participants
220
W: an ISO:9001:
in the mont
were trained
s, 5.6% ANM
other membe
ticipants
MSS (n=52) (
0.60%
:2008certified ins
th of June,
out of the in
Ms, 16.6% AW
rs.Only 0.6 %
SHG (n=176)
Oth(n=4
2.10%
5
stitution
103
2011
nvited
WW’s,
%MSS
hers 4235)
51.50%
74be
59
4.2 % participelonged to >4
9.5% Female
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
pants from ag45 years age
e participants
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
<25
ge group of 25and only 14.1
Figure 1
were trained
Figure 149
(n=1163)
14.10%
Ag
59.5
5-45 years att1% participan
148: Age distribu
compared to
9: Sex distributi
25‐45 (n=61
74.2
e group of Par
N=822
N=8220
SIHFWtended the trants were from
ution of Particip
only 40.5% m
on of Participan
100) >4
0%
rticipants
20
40.5%
0
W: an ISO:9001:anings, 11.6%age group of
ants
male.
nts
45 (n=957)
11.60%
:2008certified ins
% participantsf <25 years
Male (n=3327
Female (n=48
stitution
104
7)
893)
27
Tgr
7.0% general
he maximumrade while 9.6
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00Pe
rcen
tage
Atten
dance
0
10
20
30
40
50
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
l, 44.7% OBC
m participation6% participan
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
ST (n=
1
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
Illite(n=7
9.
C, 13.7% SC a
Figure
n (45.1%) wants were illiter
Figure 151
1205) SC
14.70%
rate 786)
1‐5(n=2
.60%
2
and 14.7% ST
150: Caste distr
as from thoserate.
1: Level of educa
C (n=1123)
13.70%
Caste of Pa
N=8220
5th 134)
5‐10(n=37
26.00%
4
Level of E
N=8220
SIHFWT category pa
ribution of Part
e who had co
ation of Particip
OBC (n=367
44.70
articipants
0
0th 705)
11‐1(n=8
45.10%
10
ducation
0
W: an ISO:9001:articipants we
icipants
ompleted sch
pants
5) Gen (n=
0%
2
12th 875)
12t(n=7
0.60%8
:2008certified ins
ere trained.
hooling upto
=2217)
27.00%
th 20)
8.80%
stitution
105
5-10th
DNTTTN
C
in
ta
be
O
S
tr
District: Prata
NGO: CUTS
otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained
No of batches
CUTS: The no
n the month o
artgeted 934 V
een successf
Out of the tota
ahyogini’s, 1
ained.
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
apgarh
locks: 5
o be trained:
VHSC: 787 s completed:
odal NGO for
of June, 2011
VHSC to be c
fully trained.
al 4838 traine
.0% NGO’s,
PRI (n=567) (
11.70%
934
: 108
VHSC trainin
and by Mar
covered in th
d participants
4.1% MSS’s
Figure 152
ANM (n=252)
AW(n=
5.20%
1
ngs at Pratap
ch 2012, the
e whole distr
s: 11.7% PRI
s, 16.0% SH
2: Category wise
WW =727)
AS (n=735
5.00% 15.2
Category o
N=48
SIHFW
garh initiated
total achieve
rict. 81.1% of
’s, 5.2% ANM
G’s and 31.7
e divison of part
5)NGO (n=48)
20%
1.00%
of Participants
838
W: an ISO:9001:
the block lev
ement amoun
the invited s
Ms, 15.0% AW
7% other me
ticipants
MSS (n=199) (
4.10%
:2008certified ins
vel VHSC trai
nts to 84.3% o
trength (5965
WW’s, 15.2%
embers have
SHG (n=775)
Oth(n=1
16.00%
3
stitution
106
inings
of the
5) has
Asha
been
hers 1535)
31.70%
70be
70
0.9% participelonged to >4
0.6% Female
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
ants from age45 years age
e participants
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
<25
e group of 25and only 16.5
Figure 1
were trained
Figure 154
(n=799)
16.50%
Ag
67.9%
-45 years atte5% participan
153: Age distribu
compared to
4: Sex distributi
25‐45 (n=34
70.9
e group of Par
N=483
N=4838
SIHFWended the trants were from
ution of Particip
only 29.4% m
on of Participan
428) >4
0%
rticipants
38
32.1%
8
W: an ISO:9001:nings, 12.6%age group of
ants
male.
nts
45 (n=611)
12.60%
:2008certified ins
% participants f <25 years
Male (n=1422
Female (n=34
stitution
107
2)
416)
13
Tgr
3.3% general
he maximumrade while 11
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00Pe
rcen
tage
Atten
dance
0
10
20
30
40
50
Percen
tage
Atten
dance
l, 17.3% OBC
m participation.1% participa
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
ST (n=
6
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
.00%
Illite(n=5
1
C, 6.9% SC an
Figure
n (43.0%) waants were illite
Figure 156
3020) S
62.40%
rate 538)
1‐5(n=15
1.10%
3
nd 62.4% ST
155: Caste distr
as from thoseerate.
6: Level of educa
SC (n=335)
6.90%
Caste of Pa
N=4838
5th 530)
5‐10(n=20
1.60%
43
Level of E
N=4838
SIHFWcategory par
ribution of Part
e who had co
ation of Particip
OBC (n=838
17.30
articipants
8
0th 082)
11‐1(n=4
3.00%
8
ducation
8
W: an ISO:9001:rticipants were
icipants
ompleted sch
pants
8) Gen (n
0%
1
12th 406)
12t(n=2
.40% 5
:2008certified ins
e trained.
hooling upto
=645)
13.30%
th 82)
.80%
stitution
108
5-10th