Bibliography

Research on Assistive Technology Tools and Supports

Bibliography | Assistive Technology Tools and Supports 1

Abell, M. M., Bauder, D. K., & Simmons, T. J. (2005). Access to the general curriculum: A curriculum and instruction perspective for educators. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(2), 82–86.

Abner, G. H., & Lahm, E. A. (2007). Implementation of assistive technology with students

who are visually impaired: Teachers' readiness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96(2), 98–106.

Ager, A., & O’May, F. (2001). Issues in the definition and implementation of “best practice”

for staff delivery of interventions for challenging behaviour. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 26(3), 243–256.

Alper, S., & Raharinirina, S. (2006). Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities: A

review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(2), 47–64.

Ayda, M., Semant, D., Scherer, M. J., Killeen, M., & Morris, M. W. (2012).

Assistive/rehabilitation technology, disability, and service delivery models. Cognitive Processing, 13(1), 75–78.

Babbit, B., & Miller, S. (1996). Using hypermedia to improve the mathematics problem-

solving skills of students with disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(4), 391–401.

Bausch, M. E., & Ault, M. J. (2008). Assistive technology implementation plan. Teaching

Exceptional Children, 41(1), 6–14. Bausch, M. E., & Hasselbring, T. S. (2004). Assistive technology: Are the necessary skills

and knowledge being developed at the preservice and inservice levels? Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(2), 97–104.

Beattie, K. (2001). The effects of intensive computer-based language intervention on

language functioning and reading achievement in language-impaired adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=931714

Behrmann, M., & Jerome, M. K. (2002). Assistive technology for students with mild

disabilities: Update 2002: ERIC Digest. Retrieved from http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/websites/eric.ed.gov/ERIC_Digests/ed463595.htm

Biggs, M. C., Homan, S. P., Dedrick, R., Minick, V., & Rasinski, T. (2008). Using an

interactive singing software program: A comparative study of struggling middle school readers. Reading Psychology, 29(3), 195–213.

Blackhurst, A. E., & Edyburn, D. L. (2000). A brief history of special education technology.

Special Education Technology Practice, 2(1), 21–35. Boone, R., & Higgins, K. (2007). The role of instructional design in assistive technology

research and development. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 135–139.

References | Virtual Learning Environments and Simulations 2

Bottge, B., & Hasselbring, T. (1993). Comparison of two approaches for teaching complex,

authentic mathematics problems to adolescents in remedial math classes. Exceptional Children, 59(6), 556–566.

Bouck, E. C. (2009). Calculating the value of graphing calculators for seventh-grade

students with and without disabilities: A pilot study. Remedial and Special Education, 30(4), 207–215.

Bouck, E. C., Shurr, J. C., Kinsey, T., Jasper, A. D., Bassette, L., Miller, B., et al. (2012). Fix it with TAPE: Repurposing technology to be assistive technology for students

with high-incidence disabilities. Preventing School Failure, 56(2), 121–128. Bryant, B. R., Seok, S., & Ok, M. (2012). Individuals with intellectual and/or developmental

disabilities use of assistive technology devices in support provision. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(2), 41–58.

Butzin, S. M. (2001). Using instructional technology in transformed learning environments:

An evaluation of Project CHILD. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 367–373.

Derer, K., Polsgrove, L., & Rieth, H. (1996). A survey of assistive technology applications

in schools and recommendations for practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(2), 63–79.

Dissinger, F. (2003). Core curriculum in assistive technology: In-service for special

educators and therapists. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(2), 35–45. Durlak, J. A. (2010). The importance of doing well in whatever you do: A commentary on

the special section, ‘‘implementation research in early childhood education.’’ Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 348–357.

Edyburn, D. (2009). Hindsight, understanding what we got wrong, and changing directions.

Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(1), 61–64. Elder-Hinshaw, R., Manset-Williamson, G., Nelson, J. M., & Dunn, M. W. (2006). Engaging

older students with reading disabilities: Multimedia inquiry projects supported by reading assistive technology. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(1), 6–11.

Elkind, K. (2004). Choosing assistive technology for teaching reading and writing. Media &

Methods, 40(6), 20–21. Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J. V., Barile, M., Fossey, M., & de Simone, C. (2000). Access to

educational and instructional computer technologies for post-secondary students with disabilities: Lessons from three empirical studies. Journal of Educational Media, 25(3), 179–201.

Flener, F. (2000). Use of interactive video technology to teach middle school mathematics

in Chicago schools: Final evaluation report. Chicago: Northeastern Illinois University, Department of Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED451055)

Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C., & Appleton, A. (2002). Explicitly teaching for transfer:

Effects on the mathematical problem-solving. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(2), 90–106.

Fuhrer, M. J., Jutai, J. W., Scherer, M. J., & Deruyter, F. (2003). A framework for the

conceptual modeling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disability & Rehabilitation, 25(22), 1243–1251.

References | Virtual Learning Environments and Simulations 3

Gillespie, A., Best, C., & O’Neill, B. (2012). Cognitive function and assistive technology for

cognition: A systematic review. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18(1), 1–19.

Gray, T., & Silver-Pacuilla, H. (2007). The future is now: Application and innovation of

technology in special education. Journal of Special Education, 22(3), 1–3. Greenwood, C. R., Arreaga-Mayer, C. U., Utley, C. A., Gavin, K. M., & Terry, B. J. (2001).

Classwide peer tutoring learning management system. Remedial & Special Education, 22(1), 34–48.

Hallenbeck, M. J. (1996). The cognitive strategy in writing: Welcome relief for adolescents

with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11(2), 107–119.

Harden, B., & Rosenberg, G. (2001). Bringing technology to the classroom. ASHA Leader,

6(14), 5–7. Hasselbring, T. S., & Glaser, C. H. (2000). Use of computer technology to help students

with special needs. Future of Children, 10(2), 102–122. Hecker, L., Burns, L., Katz, L., Elkind, J., & Elkind, K. (2002). Benefits of assistive reading

software for students with attention disorders. Annals of Dyslexia, 52(1), 243–272. Hersh, M. A., & Johnson, M. A. (2008). On modelling assistive technology systems—Part I:

Modelling framework. Technology & Disability, 20(3), 193–215. Hersh, M. A., & Johnson, M. A. (2008). On modelling assistive technology systems—Part 2:

Applications of the comprehensive assistive technology model. Technology & Disability, 20(4), 251–270.

Hess, K. L., Morrier, M. J., Heflin, L. J., & Ivey, M. L. (2008). Autism treatment survey:

Services received by children with autism spectrum disorders in public school classrooms. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 38(5), 961–971.

Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (2005). The compensatory effectiveness of the

Quicktionary Reading Pen II on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(1), 31–41.

Hitchcock, C. (2001). Balanced instructional support and challenge in universally designed

learning environments. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(4), 23–30. Hopkins, J. (2006). All students being EQUAL. Technology & Learning, 26(10), 26–28. Jeffs, T., & Morrison, W. F. (2005). Special education technology addressing diversity: A

synthesis of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(4), 19–25. Jones, I. (1995). The effect of a word processor on the written composition of second-

grade pupils.Computers in the Schools, 11(2), 43–54. Kankaanranta, M. (2001). Constructing digital portfolios: Teachers evolving capabilities in

the use of information and communications technology. Teacher Development, 5(2), 259–275.

Lahm, E. (2003). Assistive technology specialists: Bringing knowledge of assistive

technology to school districts. Remedial and Special Education, 24(3), 141–153.

References | Virtual Learning Environments and Simulations 4

Langone, J., Levine, B., Clees, T. J., Malone, M., & Koorland, M. A. (1996). The differential effects of a typing tutor and microcomputer-based word processing on the writing samples of elementary students with behavior disorders. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(2), 141–158.

Lankutis, T., & Kennedy, K. (2002). Assistive technology and the multiage classroom.

Technology & Learning, 22(8), 38, 40, 42, 44–45. Lenker, J. A., & Paquet, V. L. (2004). A new conceptual model for assistive technology

outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technology, 16(1), 1–10. Lesar, S. (1998). Use of assistive technology with young children with disabilities: Current

status and training needs. Journal of Early Intervention, 21(2), 146–159. Lewandowski, L., Begeny, J., & Rogers, C. (2006). Word-recognition training: Computer

versus tutor. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22(4), 395–410. Luft, P. (2008). Examining educators of the deaf as "highly qualified" teachers: Roles and

responsibilities under IDEA and NCLB. American Annals of the Deaf, 152(5), 429–440.

MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., Schwartz, S. S., & Schafer, W. D. (1995). Evaluation of a

writing instruction model that integrated a process approach, strategy instruction, and word processing. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 278–291.

Macleod, F., Macmillan, P., & Norwich, B. (2007). Listening to myself: Improving oracy and

literacy among children who fall behind. Early Child Development and Care, 177(6/7), 633–644.

Malinow, A., & Black, J. (2003). Integrating a multiple-linked representational program into

a middle-school learning disabled classroom. In Proceedings From the 2003 International Conference on Computing in Education. Hong Kong: Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

Maushak, N. J., Kelley, P., & Blodgett, T. (2001). Preparing teachers for the inclusive

classroom: A preliminary study of attitudes and knowledge of assistive technology. Journal of Technology in Teacher Education, 9(1), 419–431.

Mavrou, K. (2011). Assistive technology as an emerging policy and practice: Processes,

challenges and future directions. Technology & Disability, 23(1), 41–52. McLauren, E. M., Bausch, M. E., Jones Ault, M., & the National Assistive Technology

Research Institute Group. (2007). Collaboration strategies reported by teachers providing assistive technology services. Journal of Special Education, 22(4), 16–29.

McNear, D. (2005). Aligning braille literacy and assistive technology skills with ISTE

educational technology standards. Closing the Gap, 23(5), 1–9. Mechling, L. C., & Bishop, V. A. (2011). Assessment of computer-based preferences of

students with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 45(1), 15–27.

Messinger-Willman, J., & Marino, M. T. (2010). Universal Design for Learning and assistive

technology: Leadership considerations for promoting inclusive education in today's secondary schools. NASSP Bulletin, 94(1), 5–16.

Michaels, C., & McDermott, J. (2003). Assistive technology integration in special education

teacher preparation: Program coordinators' perceptions of current attainment and importance. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(3), 29–45.

References | Virtual Learning Environments and Simulations 5

Mitchell, M. J., & Fox, B. J. (2001). The effects of computer software for developing

phonological awareness in low-progress readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 40(4), 315–332.

Murray, B., Silver-Pacuila, H., & Helsel, F. I. (2007). Improving basic mathematics

instruction: Promising technology resources for students with special needs. Technology in Action, 2(5), 1–6.

Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R.

(2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137–148.

Okolo, C. M., & Bouck, E. C. (2007). Research about assistive technology: 2000–2006:

What have we learned? Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(3), 19–35. Paulsen, K. J. (2005). Infusing evidence-based practices into special education preparation

curriculum. Teacher Education and Special Education, 28(1), 21–28. Puckett, K. (2005). An assistive technology toolkit: Type II applications for students with

mild disabilities. Computers in the Schools, 22(3/4), 107–117. Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology (QIAT) Consortium Leadership Team. (2000).

Quality indicators for assistive technology services in school settings. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(4), 25–36.

Reimer, K., & Moyer, P. S. (2005). Third-graders learn about fractions using virtual

manipulatives: A classroom study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(1), 5–25.

Reznichenko, N. (2007, February). Learning with graphing calculator (GC): GC as a

cognitive tool. Paper presented at the Eastern Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Clearwater, FL.

Riley, G., Beard, L. A., & Strain, J. (2004). Assistive technology at use in the teacher

education programs at Jacksonville State University. TechTrends, 48(6), 47–50. Salminen, A.-L., Petrie, H., & Ryan, S. (2004). Impact of computer augmented

communication on the daily lives of speech-impaired children. Part I: Daily communication and activities. Technology & Disability, 16(3), 157–167.

Shiah, R. L., Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Mushinski Fulk, B. J. (1994). The effects

of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematical problem solving of students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 5(3), 131–161.

Soto, G., Muller, E., Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (2001). Critical issues in the inclusion of students

who use augmentative and alternative communication: An educational team perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 62–72.

Steel, E., Gelderblom, G. J., & De Witte, L. (2011). Development of an AT selection tool

using the ICF model. Technology & Disability, 23(1), 1–6. Sturm, J. M., & Rankin‐ Erickson, J. L. (2002). Effects of hand‐ drawn and computer‐

generated concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(2), 124–139.

Thompson, S., Lazarus, S., Clapper, A., & Thurlow, M. (2004). Essential knowledge and

sk ills needed by teachers to support the achievement of students with disabilities

References | Virtual Learning Environments and Simulations 6

(EPRRI Issue Brief Five). College Park, MD: Educational Policy Reform Research Institute.

Todis, B. (2001). It can’t hurt: Implementing AAC technology in the classroom for students

with severe and multiple disabilities. In J. Woodward & L. Cuban (Eds.), Technology curriculum and professional development: Adapting schools to meet the needs of students with disabilities (pp. 27–47). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Torgesen, J., Myers, D., Schirm, A., Stuart, E., Vartivarian, S., Mansfield, W., et al. (2006).

National assessment of Title I: Interim report to Congress—Volume II: Closing the reading gap: First year findings from a randomized trial of four reading interventions for striving readers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/disadv/title1interimreport/index.html

Turnbull, H. R., III, Wilcox, B. L., Stowe, M., & Turnbull, A. P. (2001). IDEA requirements

for use of PBS: Guidelines for responsible agencies. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3(1), 11–18.

Turner-Smith, A., & Devlin, A. (2005). E-learning for assistive technology professionals: A

review of the TELEMATE project. Medical Engineering & Physics, 27(7), 561–570. Utay, C., & Utay, J. (1997). Peer-assisted learning: The effects of cooperative learning and

cross-age peer tutoring with word processing on writing skills of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 8, 165–185.

Van Laarhoven, T. R., Munk, D. D., Lynch, K., Bosma, J., & Rouse, J. (2007). A model for

preparing special and general education preservice teachers for inclusive education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(5), 440–455.

Wattenberg, T. (2004). Beyond legal compliance: Communities of advocacy that support

accessible online learning. Internet & Higher Education, 7(2), 123–139. White, E. A., Wepner, S. B., & Wetzel, D. C. (2003). Accessible education through

assistive technology. Technological Horizons in Education (T.H.E.) Journal, 30(7), 24–30.

Williams, S. C. (2002). How speech-feedback and word-prediction software can help

students write. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(3), 72–78. Wisniewski, Z., & Smith, D. (2002). How effective is TouchMath for improving students with

special needs academic achievement on math addition mad minute timed tests? (Report No. EC 309 231). South Bend, IN: Indiana University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED469445)

Zhao, Y. (2007). Speech technology and its potential for special education. Journal of

Special Education Technology, 22(3), 35–41.

References | Virtual Learning Environments and Simulations 7